Author Topic: Oswalds Rapid Fire Training Distance  (Read 45868 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online Michael Capasse

  • Super Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3962
Re: Oswalds Rapid Fire Training Distance
« Reply #735 on: January 10, 2017, 09:18:48 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I doubt Tom Sorensen will be able to grasp the simple concept of a target closer is easier to hit.

This is something most people grasp intuitively and is after all why shooting galleries at the fair don't let you climb over the barrier and get closer to the funny little ducks.

But if it makes Oswald look guilty even the most obvious is refuted.

The fact is Oswald was trained to hit targets (forget the stupid toy scope) at 300+yards and JFK was less than a third that distance closer.

Does this mean he did it?

No..

What it means is he had the training and could have...but CTs go to ANY lengths to say he could not have.


Just as Jim Hess cannot grasp the concept of proficiency needed with that rifle.
and the evidence to prove it
« Last Edit: January 10, 2017, 09:19:43 PM
by Michael Capasse
»

Offline Alan Ewald

  • Super Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1421
Re: Oswalds Rapid Fire Training Distance
« Reply #736 on: January 10, 2017, 10:58:29 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
If you were thinking you would realize, as I have pointed out, that no matter if he practiced or not your scenario is sunk.

My interpretation, which you now confirm, makes perfect sense given the context your statement appeared in which was how your "proportionate distance" theory could fail big time in the case of the shot closest to the TSBD (58 yards).


BOOM

Nicely done, Tom.

Regards,
AE

Online James Hess

  • Super Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2193
  • Why Study a "Fairy-tale"?
Re: Oswalds Rapid Fire Training Distance
« Reply #737 on: January 11, 2017, 03:01:25 AM »
No one knows why the first shot missed.

Simply because it was closest does not mean it was a guaranteed hit.

The 2nd and 3rd shots were hits.

My scenario...that all 3 shots were well with the distance Oswald was trained at works perfectly to show he was capable.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

The lengths CTs go to ...to prove LHO could not have done this are quite ridiculous.


Online James Hess

  • Super Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2193
  • Why Study a "Fairy-tale"?
Re: Oswalds Rapid Fire Training Distance
« Reply #738 on: January 11, 2017, 03:03:31 AM »
BTW... I WAS ASKED TO SPECULATE why the 1st shot could have missed.

So, I speculated.

This is an old trick used by CTs to ridicule someone for speculating.


Offline Gary Craig

  • Super Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4781
  • "The human mind is our fundamental resource." JFK
Re: Oswalds Rapid Fire Training Distance
« Reply #739 on: January 11, 2017, 03:19:00 AM »
Maggies Drawers
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Online James Hess

  • Super Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2193
  • Why Study a "Fairy-tale"?
Re: Oswalds Rapid Fire Training Distance
« Reply #740 on: January 11, 2017, 03:35:12 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Maggies Drawers
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Mark Lane???

 snigger1

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

How did he avoid the "missing witnesses list"?

Mark Lane was proven to have twisted and fabricated witness testimony.

Why anyone would believe anything he was associated with is beyond the pale.

Want to see him in action telling a bald faced lie?

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Consider your sources.

Offline Gary Craig

  • Super Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4781
  • "The human mind is our fundamental resource." JFK
Re: Oswalds Rapid Fire Training Distance
« Reply #741 on: January 11, 2017, 04:08:39 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Mark Lane???

 snigger1

url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ugr2KQosndU#]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ugr2KQosndU#[/url]

How did he avoid the "missing witnesses list"?

Mark Lane was proven to have twisted and fabricated witness testimony.

Why anyone would believe anything he was associated with is beyond the pale.

Want to see him in action telling a bald faced lie?

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Consider your sources.


"Want to see him in action telling a bald faced lie?"

Hell, even the HSCA had to admit a shot came from the Grassy Knoll.

Regardless

Mark Lane's life and record speaks for itself.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
« Last Edit: January 11, 2017, 05:39:41 AM
by Gary Craig
»