How Could LHO Walk Seven Blocks Shortly After The Assassination & Not Be Seen?

[John Mytton]

I didn't give a timeline. Slick move on your part. The point is there are witnesses for the car ride, but no witness for him doing what the WC claimed. 🚾

I didn't give a timeline. Slick move on your part.

The time according to Craig when Oswald jumped in the car was 12:40 which was 10 minutes after the President was killed and 5 minutes before he had to go back to work, which has to mean that this car was a getaway car.

The point is there are witnesses for the car ride, but no witness for him doing what the WC claimed. 🚾

The car stopping suddenly out the front of the Depository 10 minutes after the assassination is terrific evidence for Oswald escaping the crime scene, why would they cover this up? 

JohnM

[Rob Caprio]

The time according to Craig when Oswald jumped in the car was 12:40 which was 10 minutes after the President was killed and 5 minutes before he had to go back to work, which has to mean that this car was a getaway car.

The car stopping suddenly out the front of the Depository 10 minutes after the assassination is terrific evidence for Oswald escaping the crime scene, why would they cover this up? 

JohnM

Because a getaway car signified an accomplice and they were set on the lone nut angle.

[Bill Chapman]

Somebody is not keeping track of things very well...Quote from: John Iacoletti on October 24, 2018, 11:18:32 PM
    When did Frazier say that he saw Oswald head up Elm?
   Iocolleti Reply #20...Comment about seeing Oswald come out the back dock area and cross Houston street is at about 13:00.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?287933-101/kennedy-assassination-buell-wesley-frazier-part-2
  Frazier stated in that video that he saw Oswald cross over Houston St.. and then he lost him in the crowd. He said nothing about Elm.
OK Chapman ...2002? Prove it.
 

He said nothing about Elm
>>> That was around 13:22

At 14:12 Buell mentions Oswald as 'starting to cross Elm'...

Iocolleti Reply #20...Comment about seeing Oswald come out the back dock area and cross Houston street is at about 13:00.

Buell said Oswald came out about 5-10 minutes after the shooting

[Nicholas Turner]

He said nothing about Elm
>>> That was around 13:22

At 14:12 Buell mentions Oswald as 'starting to cross Elm'...

Iocolleti Reply #20...Comment about seeing Oswald come out the back dock area and cross Houston street is at about 13:00.

Buell said Oswald came out about 5-10 minutes after the shooting

Think the 13.00 is a reference to the point in the interview where that is said rather than the time on 23rd when it was said to have occurred.

[Bill Chapman]

I watched an interview with Buell Frazier recently where he said he saw LHO walk from the TSBD after the shooting and walk away along Elm. I hadn't heard this before, and he didn't say it in other interviews I've watched, so is this accepted or known?

Buell did say Oswald was starting to cross Elm, but these characters need proof that he actually walked along Elm. Maybe they beamed him up. Any excuse goes to keep CT mancrush Oswald off Elm haha

https://www.c-span.org/video/?287933-101/kennedy-assassination-buell-wesley-frazier-part-2

Here's part one of the same interview. It's interesting as well.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?287933-1/kennedy-assassination-buell-wesley-frazier-part-1

[Jerry Freeman]

Additionally ....Frazier [in his interviews] states that Oswald was calm and appeared not to be nervous when he saw him after the shooting.
This agrees with the cab driver in his statement concerning his passenger [be it Oswald or not]
In their zeal to hang it on Lee, the cops found a willing Bledsoe who expressed an apparent distaste for him. A calm Oswald was not suspicious enough. So what then if he did hop a bus?...it doesn't prove that Oswald shot JFK.

Buell said Oswald came out about 5-10 minutes after the shooting

Yeah out the back door. The Report said 3 minutes out the front door. Every minute counted in order to get Oswald over in time to shoot that cop.

[Martin Weidmann]

The bag contained Oswald's prints and a fiber that matched Oswald's blanket, the same blanket that was empty on the floor of the Paine garage.



JohnM

a fiber that matched Oswald's blanket


You keep claiming this, but show us where an expert actually used the word "matched"?

[Richard Smith]

Smith keeps claiming that I am putting forth a theory, "a fantasy theory" to boot, when I am actually pointing out what the  evidence actually shows. Why does he keep ignoring the actual evidence?

Why does he support theories with NO supporting evidence? You'll notice that he hasn't cited one piece of evidence in all his replies.

Translation:  although Rob has repeatedly claimed that Oswald was not on the bus and any evidence of such is the product of fakery or lies, he cannot come up with any explanation whatsoever for why his conspirators would fake Oswald's appearance on a bus that takes him nowhere.  If the purpose of Oswald's "fake" bus ride was to cover up for getting a ride from someone else, it does not do that because the bus takes him nowhere and the cab ride would suffice for that purpose.  There is no rational explanation in a conspiracy scenario for placing Oswald both on this bus and a cab, necessitating that a random group of bus passengers be convinced not to say otherwise, when the cab ride alone would have served that purpose.  Thus, the bus ride makes no sense as part of any fabricated event.