How Could LHO Walk Seven Blocks Shortly After The Assassination & Not Be Seen?

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: How Could LHO Walk Seven Blocks Shortly After The Assassination & Not Be Seen?  (Read 192018 times)

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5120
Go back to my reply (message # 59 - click below) and you will see I actually quoted the entire text and then highlighted for clarity the part I wanted to ask a question about.

So, once again you lie and misrepresent the facts. But then, what else is new?

Quote
and then highlighted...

Thanks for admitting it, you took my comment, stripped it of any context and deceitfully tried to create your own narrative from this heavily abridged version. Naughty naughty.

JohnM

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178

Thanks for admitting it, you took my comment, stripped it of any context and deceitfully tried to create your own narrative from this heavily abridged version. Naughty naughty.

JohnM

He says, after doing exactly the same but with bad intentions. Oh the irony of it.

But so much for the diversions..... now let's get back to the issue. You didn't think I would let this rest, did you?

You still haven't told us where the "therefore the entire work is contaminated" part came from if it wasn't a quote from Rob Caprio.

Remember this;

Watch the weasel squirm?.

how much of my post after "How does this work Caprio?, you say" can be attributed to Caprio, the first few words or all of it?


All of it between the two komma's and prior to you asking a question!


Desperate for a way out, Johnny is now trying to spin this thing by suggesting that only the first part (about the FBI and WC altering testimony, which is something Rob did indeed say) was a quote from him and the second part ("therefor the entire work is contaminated") somehow wasn't.

The problem for Johnny is that the question he asked clearly reveals that by "any of this tainted evidence" he means "the entire work" that is contaminated. So, not some of it, but all of it. This is beyond obvious because if only parts of the material of the FBI and WC were "contaminated" his question would make no sense.  In other words, he needed to attribute the quote (including "the entire contamined work" bit) to Rob Caprio to be able to ask the question!

Besides, if the bit about the "entire contaminated work" is not an (alleged) quote from Rob Caprio, as Johnny now claims, then where does it come from, who said it and why is it included in a question directed at Rob Caprio?

Now let?s watch the weasel squirm some more?.

Well, Johnny.... did you try to put words in Rob Caprio's mouth to ask an invalid question or not?
« Last Edit: October 21, 2018, 01:27:58 PM by Martin Weidmann »

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5120
So much for the diversions..... now let's get back to the issue. You didn't think I would let this rest, did you?

You still haven't told us where the "therefore the entire work is contaminated" part came from if it wasn't a quote from Rob Caprio.

Remember this;

Well, Johnny.... did you try to put words in Rob Caprio's mouth to ask an invalid question or not?

Quote
So much for the diversions.....

Typical Weidmann, claim the evidence is a mere "diversion".

Quote
now let's get back to the issue.

I never left this issue.

Quote
You didn't think I would let this rest, did you?

Huh? Is this juvenile threat supposed scare me? LOL! I was the one who told you to "try again", so why would I expect you to rest? I'm actually enjoying exposing your lack of grammatical skills and watching you jump through my hoops is really neat.

Quote
You still haven't told us where the "therefore the entire work is contaminated" part came from if it wasn't a quote from Rob Caprio

Just how thick are you? The "therefore the entire work is contaminated" when read with the surrounding context is obviously from me and since then we have established that I was right about Rob admitting that he believes that the FBI altered evidence which means that by definition anything handled by the FBI cannot be trusted and "therefore the entire work is contaminated"

Btw I look forward to your next post. keep it up!

JohnM

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178
Typical Weidmann, claim the evidence is a mere "diversion".

I never left this issue.

Huh? Is this juvenile threat supposed scare me? LOL! I was the one who told you to "try again", so why would I expect you to rest? I'm actually enjoying exposing your lack of grammatical skills and watching you jump through my hoops is really neat.

Just how thick are you? The "therefore the entire work is contaminated" when read with the surrounding context is obviously from me and since then we have established that I was right about Rob admitting that he believes that the FBI altered evidence which means that by definition anything handled by the FBI cannot be trusted and "therefore the entire work is contaminated"

Btw I look forward to your next post. keep it up!

JohnM

The "therefore the entire work is contaminated" when read with the surrounding context is obviously from me

Thanks for admitting that you presented a pathetic conclusion of your own as an alleged quote to Rob Caprio!

That's all I wanted to hear from you. I'm glad you've finally admitted to your dishonesty.   Thumb1:

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5120
The "therefore the entire work is contaminated" when read with the surrounding context is obviously from me

Thanks for admitting that you presented a pathetic conclusion of your own as an alleged quote to Rob Caprio!

That's all I wanted to hear from you. I'm glad you've finally admitted to your dishonesty.   Thumb1:

Since I never used quotation marks and I never once said that I quoted Caprio verbatim then clearly my initial post was simply seeking clarification for Caprio's views and this innocent request was further reinforced by my asking a question so as to give Caprio a fair a chance at a response.

Quote
That's all I wanted to hear from you.

We'll see?

Quote
I'm glad you've finally admitted to your dishonesty.

The fact that you have trouble with the English language isn't my problem.

JohnM


Offline Rob Caprio

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1094
Well, he seems to be running from this one, in much the same way as he ran from the discussion about CE399 ever being at Parkland Hospital.

No credibility whatsoever!

I agree.

Offline Rob Caprio

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1094
Your quote says that the FBI altered evidence and if you truly believe that you have provided proof that they actually altered evidence then how could you possibly trust anything that was presented by the FBI therefore the entire case is contaminated and if this is not what you are trying to say then what possible incentive do you have for bringing up these tiny isolated anomalies in the first place??

Anyway look at it this way, if I find a single turd in my swimming pool then the entire pool is contaminated and needs to be emptied and disinfected but it appears that you would rather swim with your turd, fair enough!


JohnM

I think your hole is really deep. I didn't say what you attributed to me. Just admit that you once again made up something and attributed to someone else.