Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: If a bullet didn't go through JFK, then exactly how did Connally get hit?  (Read 50891 times)

Offline Gary Craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 907
Re: If a bullet didn't go through JFK, then exactly how did Connally get hit?
« Reply #48 on: September 21, 2018, 02:34:10 PM »
Advertisement
John F Kennedy - The Autopsy

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: If a bullet didn't go through JFK, then exactly how did Connally get hit?
« Reply #48 on: September 21, 2018, 02:34:10 PM »


Offline Jack Nessan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 921
Re: If a bullet didn't go through JFK, then exactly how did Connally get hit?
« Reply #49 on: September 21, 2018, 02:39:00 PM »
Let me guess Jack, your "two shot hypothesis" is absolutely reliant on the SBT and everyone (majority of witnesses) who heard three distinct shots were "mistaken"?

So those researchers looking for the "lost bullet" were just wasting their time  because only two shots were ever fired.  ;D

You always seem to be particularly fascinated about the number of shots. Must be something about there only having been two shots fired that makes sense to you. Maybe because most of the early eyewitness reports stated it. If you can prove there was a third shot by all means do so. Neither the WC or the HSCA definitely believed there was three shots fired.

The question in front of you, that you seem unable to answer, is how was JBC wounded if the bullet does not first pass through JFK. You could not answer this question two years ago and apparently you still can't answer it now.

Funny about Kent Bifle writing the story about Brennan seeing the rifle fired. Isn't he one of the witnesses who first saw CE 142 in the SN and ended the whole Studebaker-Day making the bag storyline?

Offline Howard Gee

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343
Re: If a bullet didn't go through JFK, then exactly how did Connally get hit?
« Reply #50 on: September 21, 2018, 02:57:15 PM »
No one has said that CE 399 was planted.

What you have to prove was that CE 399 went through anyone on 22/11/1963.

List your evidence:

Note - speculation is not evidence.

The evidence is JFK's and JBC's wounds.

That's not speculation, that's fact.

What ? You think they weren't wounded by gunfire ?

Are you proposing that a bullet or bullets fired on a downward angle and wounding both men just vanished into thin air ?

The bullet(s) would either be found in the men, or in the limo, or in the case of Connally's barely subcutaneous thigh wound, in Parkland after it was dislodged from the extremely minor wound or his pants.

It's a common sense, no-brainer.

The only other possibility that deserves consideration is TWO shooters from the rear, and even that wouldn't explain the absence of a bullet in either man or in the limo.

Add in the fact no witness has ever reported seeing an additional gunman in the TSBD or DalTex building firing a rifle at 12:30 PM, and that only three shells were found, only one rifle was found, and the rifle that was found fired CE399 to the exclusion of any other rifle on the planet and you've got the SINGLE BULLET FACT.

Here's another newsflash; the theory that JFK's throat wound was an entry wound can be dispelled just as easily if you just apply a little common sense to that problem.

Common sense ain't so common, at least not when it comes to CKs.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: If a bullet didn't go through JFK, then exactly how did Connally get hit?
« Reply #50 on: September 21, 2018, 02:57:15 PM »


Offline John Agee

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 26
Re: If a bullet didn't go through JFK, then exactly how did Connally get hit?
« Reply #51 on: September 21, 2018, 04:32:04 PM »
If JFK was hit before he goes behind the sign, then so is JC with 5 wounds. How then was JC able to turn around and look at JFK with shattered ribs and a cracked wrist?

That is an excellent question, and as a LN I have always wondered about that. Delayed reaction? Seems unlikely but i am no wound ballistic expert. JFK and JC hit by separate bullets within a 1/4 or a second or so? That seems impossible given the evidence. But good question Tony, and I admit, that has me puzzled.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: If a bullet didn't go through JFK, then exactly how did Connally get hit?
« Reply #52 on: September 21, 2018, 05:52:46 PM »
You ARE the biggest Troll on the forum. You set up a thread with a pre determined and loaded question, don't like the responses and then call me a troll?


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: If a bullet didn't go through JFK, then exactly how did Connally get hit?
« Reply #52 on: September 21, 2018, 05:52:46 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: If CE399 didn't go through JFK, then exactly how did Connally get hit?
« Reply #53 on: September 21, 2018, 05:54:26 PM »
And not one person saw anyone anywhere else in Dealey Plaza with a rifle! and besides the President of the USA was driving by and you reckon that people should be looking for Oswald up on the 6th floor, wow, get a grip!

But you somehow know it was Oswald, because . . . reasons.

Get a grip, indeed.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: If CE399 didn't go through JFK, then exactly how did Connally get hit?
« Reply #54 on: September 21, 2018, 05:58:26 PM »
Well maybe if the shells and rifle were found in the DAL tex building then you may have something but till then please stop embarrassing yourself.

"the shells and rifle".  Like you know what shells and rifle caused Connally's wounds.

Who searched the Dal-Tex building?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: If CE399 didn't go through JFK, then exactly how did Connally get hit?
« Reply #54 on: September 21, 2018, 05:58:26 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: If CE399 didn't go through JFK, then exactly how did Connally get hit?
« Reply #55 on: September 21, 2018, 06:03:16 PM »
No they used measurements based on tailor fitted clothing and on height. Do you think Meyers had better measurements?

This hunchbacked monstrosity is supposed to be accurate?