Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Conspiracy of the Three Stooges  (Read 52509 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: Conspiracy of the Three Stooges
« Reply #216 on: September 17, 2018, 06:38:56 PM »
Advertisement
You missed the point and have taken your quotes out of context, much like Oswald finally admitting that he came down from the 6th floor,

More blatant dishonesty from "Mytton".  Oswald never admitted that he came down from the 6th floor.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Conspiracy of the Three Stooges
« Reply #216 on: September 17, 2018, 06:38:56 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: Conspiracy of the Three Stooges
« Reply #217 on: September 17, 2018, 06:40:22 PM »
I did know, actually. I'm not a robot that remembers levery detail, especially a detail that doesn't change the fact that Marina laughed at his getup in the photos.

That doesn't stop you from being arrogant about the things you don't remember correctly.

Offline Howard Gee

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343
Re: Conspiracy of the Three Stooges
« Reply #218 on: September 17, 2018, 06:41:05 PM »
Well, astrology experts said that it was not Oswald, because his moon was in Virgo. 

Well, that settles it then. Those astrology experts have provided the best exculpatory evidence yet.

Forget about the expert testimony and the physical and circumstantial evidence pointing to Saint Patsy's guilt. That's all meaningless and worthless.

Plus I just opened a fortune cookie that said it wasn't Oswald.


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Conspiracy of the Three Stooges
« Reply #218 on: September 17, 2018, 06:41:05 PM »


Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Conspiracy of the Three Stooges
« Reply #219 on: September 17, 2018, 06:43:59 PM »
Yes, Walt, we all know the story that you have fabricated around this.  Too bad your evidence list is undated, and you don't actually know when the FBI received it.

The evidence inventory list does not have to have a date and time stamped on it if the examiner of the list is reasonably intelligent and can see that the original list does not identify the rifle as a "carcano carbine" because at midnight 11 /22/63 they did not know that the rifle was a Mannlicher Carcano.....  (but on Saturday 11/23/63 they learned the rifle was called a Carcano)

And the original EI sheet listed item number six as....quote...." .38 cal pistol  2 inch barrel    That's all nothing more ....

Whereas the "updated sheet" adds additional information which says that the pistol was released to FBI  on 11 /22/63 and again on 11/26/63.

So the original sheet corroborates the "updated sheet of 11/26/63 by saying the gun was released to the FBI on 11/ 22/ 63 ...and sure enough that pistol IS listed on the evidence list on which the police did not yet know that the rifle was a Carcano.

Item number 14 on that original evidence inventory list is the... Quote..." 1 Partial palm " Off underside gun barrel near end of foregrip" on rifle #C, 2766 

The words ..."Off underside gun barrel near end of foregrip"  are in quotaion marks because they are being quoted from the 3 X 5 indwx card on which Lt Day had placed the cellophane tape that held the smudge that he imagined to be a print which he lifted from the foregrip of the carcano while examining it in the TSBD at about 1:45 that afternoon.  Tom Alyea was right ther watching as Day lifted that smuge and placed it on that index card.

 

Offline Nicholas Turner

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 378
Re: Conspiracy of the Three Stooges
« Reply #220 on: September 17, 2018, 06:44:51 PM »
Well, astrology experts said that it was not Oswald, because his moon was in Virgo.  The dowsing experts and the I-Ching experts were divided.

Do you consider hand writing analysis to be no more accurate than dowsing or astrology then?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Conspiracy of the Three Stooges
« Reply #220 on: September 17, 2018, 06:44:51 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: Conspiracy of the Three Stooges
« Reply #221 on: September 17, 2018, 07:02:30 PM »
Well, that settles it then. Those astrology experts have provided the best exculpatory evidence yet.

Forget about the expert testimony and the physical and circumstantial evidence pointing to Saint Patsy's guilt. That's all meaningless and worthless.

Plus I just opened a fortune cookie that said it wasn't Oswald.

Exactly.  That's about as useful as your "expert" handwriting "analysis".

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: Conspiracy of the Three Stooges
« Reply #222 on: September 17, 2018, 07:04:08 PM »
Do you consider hand writing analysis to be no more accurate than dowsing or astrology then?

Correct.  They are all unscientific and subjective.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Conspiracy of the Three Stooges
« Reply #222 on: September 17, 2018, 07:04:08 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: Conspiracy of the Three Stooges
« Reply #223 on: September 17, 2018, 07:08:04 PM »
Option 2.
Williams saw Oswald before he left. He says nothing about this to the DPD even though Oswald has been arrested and is the prime suspect. Williams is questioned about Oswald and the sixth floor.

If BRW had seen Oswald there, why would he have not just said so?