Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)  (Read 67164 times)

Offline Nicholas Turner

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 378
Re: I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)
« Reply #24 on: October 09, 2018, 09:00:46 PM »
Advertisement
Changed my post as misunderstood your point slightly. So, what actual evidence is there for actual lies?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)
« Reply #24 on: October 09, 2018, 09:00:46 PM »


Offline Rob Caprio

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1094
Re: I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)
« Reply #25 on: October 09, 2018, 09:58:51 PM »
I am not going to simply cite a number of two. I wrote a whole book about
why I moved from believing in conspiracy to knowing that Lee Harvey Oswald
was the lone gunman. Look, don't read my book. It's not for you. That is obvious.

You are correct as it seems NOT to be based on the actual evidence because none of that, including the HSCA stuff, supports the WC's conclusion.

I rely on the evidence and not someone's opinion. Calling people who don't accept an unsupported conclusion "freaks" is offensive too.

Offline Rob Caprio

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1094
Re: I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)
« Reply #26 on: October 09, 2018, 10:06:24 PM »
Is that the article which contains a big chunk of author's speculation? Surprised it didn't mention Larry Crafard either.

But you have no problem supporting the speculation of the WC, right?

Here is what real judges think of the WCR.

Quote on

The Warren Report? All three judges in the case [Clay Shaw] agreed that it was inadmissible as evidence in judicial proceedings.

"If we are going to accept the Warren Report as factual, then we have wasted a week of time", Judge Bagert declared near the end of the hearing.

Another judge, Matthew S. Braniff, said of the Warren Report: "It is fraught with hearsay and contradictions."

"And that's putting it mildly," Bagert commented.

A few days later, Judge Edward A. Haggerty Jr., who had been appointed to preside at the trial of Clay Shaw, also said the Warren Report could not be admitted as evidence at the trial.

(Excerpted from "The Garrison Inquiry" by Joachim Joesten, 1967, p. 70)

Quote off

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)
« Reply #26 on: October 09, 2018, 10:06:24 PM »


Offline Nicholas Turner

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 378
Re: I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)
« Reply #27 on: October 09, 2018, 10:09:09 PM »
But you have no problem supporting the speculation of the WC, right?

No.

Offline Rob Caprio

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1094
Re: I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)
« Reply #28 on: October 09, 2018, 10:10:23 PM »
Well, now we can all go home. John Armstrong, the guy who thinks there were two Oswalds and two Marguerites running around has cracked the case!  :D

The issue of two Oswalds goes way back before John Armstrong. How do you explain all the discrepancies in LHO's height and eye color?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)
« Reply #28 on: October 09, 2018, 10:10:23 PM »


Offline Rob Caprio

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1094
Re: I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)
« Reply #29 on: October 09, 2018, 10:12:42 PM »

Offline Nicholas Turner

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 378
Re: I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)
« Reply #30 on: October 09, 2018, 10:15:00 PM »
Why the double standard?

What double standard?

Edit: I meant no, you aren't right, not no I have no problem supporting speculation by the WC. So no double standards.
« Last Edit: October 09, 2018, 10:19:31 PM by Nicholas Turner »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)
« Reply #30 on: October 09, 2018, 10:15:00 PM »


Online W. Tracy Parnell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 345
    • W. Tracy Parnell Debunking JFK Conspiracy Theories
Re: I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)
« Reply #31 on: October 09, 2018, 11:52:18 PM »
The issue of two Oswalds goes way back before John Armstrong. How do you explain all the discrepancies in LHO's height and eye color?

I don't explain every discrepancy. Professional investigators (police, FBI) know that in any case there will be anomalies. In a case with millions of pieces of information like the JFK case, there are probably thousands of things that are "outliers." Completely normal.