I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)

[W. Tracy Parnell]

A decent, if not impartial, synopsis of the Garrison case against Clay Shaw.

Still conspicuously absent:  any of this "overwhelming evidence" that incriminates Oswald.

P.S. McAdams.  LOL.

The evidence is very well known. Get Reclaiming History or try this site:


http://oswald-is-guilty.blogspot.com/

[Bill Chapman]

A decent, if not impartial, synopsis of the Garrison case against Clay Shaw.

Still conspicuously absent:  any of this "overwhelming evidence" that incriminates Oswald.

P.S. McAdams.  LOL.

Iacoletti. LOL.

P.S.  Gaslighter.

[John Iacoletti]

The evidence is very well known. Get Reclaiming History or try this site:


http://oswald-is-guilty.blogspot.com/

I have read both.  But where is the "overwhelming evidence" that incriminates Oswald?  Not in those places.  Mr. Litwin was convinced by something specific after all, wasn't he?  What was it?

[John Iacoletti]

Iacoletti. LOL.

P.S.  Gaslighter.

Gorillas playing basketball.  LOL.

[Steve Logan]

I have read both.  But where is the "overwhelming evidence" that incriminates Oswald?  Not in those places.  Mr. Litwin was convinced by something specific after all, wasn't he?  What was it?

The treasure on Oak Island.

[Ray Mitcham]

After reading Chapter two, I'm glad I didn't purchase the whole book.

[W. Tracy Parnell]

Mr. Litwin was convinced by something specific after all, wasn't he?  What was it?

Asked and answered in the other thread (which you participated in). The answer is the HSCA volumes. Not sure why you keep asking this.

[John Iacoletti]

Asked and answered in the other thread (which you participated in). The answer is the HSCA volumes. Not sure why you keep asking this.

Because it was a non-answer.  Fred mentioned how the HSCA concluded (by looking at photographs) that the shots came from behind, but never explained how that implicates Oswald.