Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Anthony Marsh Claims *He* Proved The Zapruder Film Is Authentic  (Read 6038 times)

Offline Steve Barber

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 199
Anthony Marsh Claims *He* Proved The Zapruder Film Is Authentic
« on: January 18, 2018, 03:42:34 PM »


 True or false?  I've looked the internet over and cannot find any confirmation the *He* proved the film to be authentic.

Marsh's home is the alt.assassination.jfk newsgroup where he is constantly claiming this.

 Where can I find the truth about it?  Anyone?  I thought that it was Roland Zavada who proved the film authentic, not Marsh.

Online Sean Kneringer

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 48
Re: Anthony Marsh Claims *He* Proved The Zapruder Film Is Authentic
« Reply #1 on: January 18, 2018, 03:49:47 PM »
Did you know that he called Bugliosi a liar right to his face? It's true! Just ask him.

The man feels compelled to weigh in on every topic at a.a.jfk whether he knows anything about it or not. In short, he's a spammer.

Offline Steve Barber

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 199
Re: Anthony Marsh Claims *He* Proved The Zapruder Film Is Authentic
« Reply #2 on: January 18, 2018, 04:19:42 PM »
Did you know that he called Bugliosi a liar right to his face? It's true! Just ask him.

The man feels compelled to weigh in on every topic at a.a.jfk whether he knows anything about it or not. In short, he's a spammer.

 Yes I did. I found this out when he was bragging about having called Vince a liar to his face at aajfk and.  I think he bragged about it here at this forum.  The man has no class, no respect for others, full of himself and as arrogant as they get.  He actually posted a comment at aajfk  saying "talk down to people with a lesser education. So easy to do here."  He's the most unscrupulous person in that newsgroup.  Yup. He's a spammer and king of the Trolls.  He's proud of it.

Offline Steve Barber

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 199
Re: Anthony Marsh Claims *He* Proved The Zapruder Film Is Authentic
« Reply #3 on: January 18, 2018, 04:21:22 PM »
Marsh's real home is 10 minutes down the road from me. Here's his website    http://the-puzzle-palace.com/files/   . His website is just like him. A stagnant pond.

 Oh, I feel sorry for you having to live 10 minutes from him. Have you ever met him? I have. VERY unscrupulous human being--if he can even be called that. His name should be listed next to the word loathsome within the dictionary.  I have a feeling that on Judgment day, he will argue with the LORD when God says "Depart from me..."
« Last Edit: January 18, 2018, 04:24:04 PM by Steve Barber »

Online Sean Kneringer

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 48
Re: Anthony Marsh Claims *He* Proved The Zapruder Film Is Authentic
« Reply #4 on: January 18, 2018, 04:33:36 PM »
Yes I did. I found this out when he was bragging about having called Vince a liar to his face at aajfk and.  I think he bragged about it here at this forum.  The man has no class, no respect for others, full of himself and as arrogant as they get.  He actually posted a comment at aajfk  saying "talk down to people with a lesser education. So easy to do here."  He's the most unscrupulous person in that newsgroup.  Yup. He's a spammer and king of the Trolls.  He's proud of it.

don't forget smearing his opponents as "Nazis." no class at all.

Offline Steve Barber

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 199
Re: Anthony Marsh Claims *He* Proved The Zapruder Film Is Authentic
« Reply #5 on: January 18, 2018, 04:37:43 PM »
http://the-puzzle-palace.com/zapruder.htm

Thanks, Steve.  I read that awhile back.  Very interesting, but I don't understand why he claims that he proved the Z film is authentic.  He didn't, but he gets some sort of gratification out of saying that he did. 

Offline Steve Barber

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 199
Re: Anthony Marsh Claims *He* Proved The Zapruder Film Is Authentic
« Reply #6 on: January 18, 2018, 04:46:51 PM »
don't forget smearing his opponents as "Nazis." no class at all.

Exactly.  He just did that to me earlier this week, but .John McAdams rejected the post.  Marsh was so proud of his response to me that he actually emailed the thread to me, comparing me to the Nazi's for bawling him out.  When I asked him about it in the thread he denied having sent me the email.  Typical.  Here's the link to the thread and his rejected post that came to me via email:

  https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.assassination.jfk/GiECgv6b_wE

 
 
Inbox
x

Anthony Marsh <anthony.marsh@comcast.net>
Jan 11 (7 days ago)

to me
On 1/10/2018 11:03 PM, Steve Barber wrote:
On Wednesday, January 10, 2018 at 10:38:14 AM UTC-5, Anthony Marsh wrote:
On 1/9/2018 1:21 PM, Bud wrote:
On Monday, January 8, 2018 at 12:41:09 PM UTC-5, Anthony Marsh wrote:
On 1/6/2018 7:47 PM, Bud wrote:
On Friday, January 5, 2018 at 9:04:06 PM UTC-5, Anthony Marsh wrote:
On 1/4/2018 10:11 PM, Steve Barber wrote:
On Wednesday, January 3, 2018 at 9:42:04 AM UTC-5, Anthony Marsh wrote:

This year can you just stop lying about the evidence and being
hypocritical about what the evidence means?
For example.
The bullet wounds.
The autopsy photos show that the wound from behind JFK was in his back,
but WC defenders keep saying neck. Or is it possible that the WC
defenders don't know the difference between the back and the neck.

WC defenders lie about the elongation of Connally's back wound and claim
that their elongated version proves that their Single Bullet was tumbling.
They also claim that There was no way for Connally to be hit by a
separate bullet, but the Dale Myers diagram shows that there was plenty
of room for a bullet to go over JFK's right shoulder and hit Connally's
right armpit. WC defenders lie and claim that their bullet hit the
middle of Connally's back.
We have one kook who claims that a bullet hit JFK in the back and just
stopped only an inch or so into the back. The WC defenders rightly claim
that was physically impossible, but then they have CE 399 penetrate only
an inch into Connally's thigh and then magically just fall out when they
removed Connally's cloths   in the ER. It's like a hypocrisy contest to
see which WC defender can be more dishonest.

     I think that it's interesting that you call "WC defenders" "liars". You
claim that the Dale Myers "diagram" shows that "there was plenty of room
for a bullet to go over JFK's right shoulder and hit Connally's right
armpit. WC defenders lie and claim that their bullet hit the middle of
Connally's back."  That is an absolute false statement on your part. There

False. I SHOW you that there was plenty of room:

http://www.the-puzzle-palace.com/Toaster94.jpg

See the white dot?

     Where are the people? And why are they both bald? And who is driving?


Well, usually anatomical figures are depicted as bald.
Don't blame me or Myers.

     And how does that white dot in any way show what was visible from the
SN?


Similar angle from above and to the right.
That was why he drew it. To show the relative positions.

    Perhaps it was drawn to bait conspiracy hobbyists into taking silly
positions.
   
That's where Connally's entrance wound was.

     I see the TSBD ahead. If Oswald shot then we might have had a reverse
SBT, with Connally struck first.
   

I didn't say it was at the time of the shot.
It only shows the relative positions.

    If the shooting occurred on Houston Street.
   
The HSCA drawing shows the top of JFK shoulder.

     This is a HSCA drawing?


Yes, silly.

    Why does it look like the cover of a magazine?

Don't try to flatter me and claim that I drew it.
You can see where I taped it over the Mysers drawing.

Plenty of room to go
above his right shoulder and hit Connally.

     This is not Myers`s work. I produced Myers`s work. I doesn`t show the
room you claimed was there.


You did not produce Myer's work.

    Yes, I did.


No, you are not listed as having any association with Video Toaster.

The file name says it: Toaster Magazine.
Anyone can see that there is plenty of room for a bullet to go over
Kennedy's right shoulder and hit Connally.

    Nobody cares about your cartoons.


I did not draw that cartoon.

Any HONEST person.

    No true Scotsman fallacy.
   
You of all people have absolutely no standing to call anyone a liar.

     I allowed that you were merely ignorant.


So McAdams allows you to call me ignorant, but he won't allow me to call
you stupid. Hard to debate anything when he holds my arms behind my back
to allow you to punch me.

    You are ignorant to the fact that "stupid" is an insult and "ignorant"
is not.
 

You are ignorant of the fact that McAams censors my messages to protect
his minions and yet allows his minions to insult me.

    Whaaaaaaaaa-uh-haaaaaa--haaaaaaaa! Stop whining, Marsh, you poor,
mistreated, thing.  You are ignorant of the fact that you talk down to
everyone in here, dishing out insult after insult to people constantly and
none of those posts are "censored". You dish plenty of it out, but you
can't take it when some of it's dished out to you!


That's the type of thing the Nazis said to the Jews as they pushed them into the gas chambers. Stop whining and take your punishment.
Please dish out more to prove to everyone what kind of person you are. Never debate honestly. Always insult.



You are a slave to the greatest lie of all, the Warren Commission Report.

     They did what conspiracy hobbyists cannot. Put a reasonable and
supportable explanation for this event on the table for consideration.


Silly.

    Yet there it is.
   
You can't even think for yourself with a grade school education.

     In which case he should be easy to sway with your persuasive arguments.
Except you don`t have any.


Sway? A closed mind can not be swayed.
He can't admit any facts.

    You are blaming other people for your lack of persuasive arguments.
   
Worse than Trump.

     Trump`s thinking seems very much on a par with the thinking I see
exhibited by conspiracy folk.
   

Trump IS a conspiracy folk!

    That explains it then.
   
is no "room" and there is no way any bullet flew over President Kennedy's
right shoulder and struck the governor's armpit! If you actually believe
that, then post the Dale Myers diagram to which you refer, immediately.



I never said that is what actually happened. I just pointed out that it
is possible, to show the hypocrisy of the WC defenders. Stop trying to
put words in my mouth after you've lost the argument.

Pretend that you have never seen the file I just posted for the
thousandth time.
Go ahead.







« Last Edit: January 18, 2018, 05:17:42 PM by Steve Barber »

Offline Steve Barber

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 199
Re: Anthony Marsh Claims *He* Proved The Zapruder Film Is Authentic
« Reply #7 on: January 18, 2018, 05:07:21 PM »
He's one of those Old School Nutjobs that's very bitter about the fact that he's nearing the expiration date of his carbon footprint so he's come to the realization that all that he's about has amounted to a tiny blip on a very large radar. We have one on here now. He fabricates like there's no tomorrow and in his case very few tomorrows. The sands of time are running out on these old wackos.

  I can vouch for what you just said.  He seldom, if ever, would start threads at aajfk. Now, he is posting several a week all of a sudden.  I wondered why that was, and now that you mention what you just did in your comment, therein lies the answer.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7962
Re: Anthony Marsh Claims *He* Proved The Zapruder Film Is Authentic
« Reply #8 on: January 18, 2018, 06:55:23 PM »
Marsh also claims credit for the entire Drommer and Associates Dealey Plaza survey because he once corrected a 1 foot error in one of the measurements.

Online Sean Kneringer

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 48
Re: Anthony Marsh Claims *He* Proved The Zapruder Film Is Authentic
« Reply #9 on: January 18, 2018, 07:38:03 PM »
If I'm not mistaken, he's an old retired guy living on a very fixed income. I guess aajfk, not shuffleboard, is how he intends to spend his golden years.

 

Mobile View