There is
no connection between the wounds,that the point,shooting downward,how does a bullet then travel upward to exit the throat,he noticed the shot to the throat,saying it was a entrance wound because it was round before the other doctors. widen the opening Also said there had been a shot to the president side forehead at the hairline.
But the neck was shored up by the buttoned collar. This will cause the exit wounds to be smaller than they otherwise would be. The coat and the shirt show the bullet in the back was an entrance wound and the neck wound was an exit wound.
Such evidence has to be considered decisive. You will not find a single ballistic expert in the world who thinks the neck wound was an entrance wound.
Also, the doctor?s at Parkland gave the briefest possible look at the neck wound. Because the President was barely breathing, they thought that possibly an obstruction in the upper throat was blocking the breathing and so they must
immediately cut the wound open to be much bigger and stick in a breathing tube. Most doctors did not see the neck wound until after it have been greatly modified by one of the other doctors.
Basically, to reach your conclusion, one would have to assume:
1. The coat and shirt left in Dallas were faked. This is strange because a basic premise of the CT argument was that they had to take the body of President Kennedy out of Dallas, because they could not get a fraudulent study of the evidence in Texas. But they had no problem suppressing the evidence of the clothes left in Dallas which could have been studied by the Parkland doctors or even the Dallas coroner, proving a shot from the front.
2. The shooters used bullets that only enter the body, but don?t go all the way through the body. Just like a handgun bullet. Such bullets are inherently less accurate, due to the low speed required of a bullet to only enter a body but not to exit it. And the less lethal nature of these bullets. This is hard to believe.
3. That these shooters got lucky. They didn?t end up with 2 entrance wounds in the back, which would indicate that Oswald could not have used a Carcano rifle. They didn?t end up with 2 entrance wounds in the front, which would indicate that Oswald didn?t fire these shots at all. Instead, they ended up with a frontal wound and a back wound, both of which on opposite sides of the body making it easy to say they were caused by the same bullet. Unbelievable the shooters would try this and hope things work out.
Huge question,why wasn't any doctors in the trauma room,ever called to testify?
It is normal to get the testimony of the autopsy doctors who studied the body for 3 hours, for the purpose of finding out what happened. And not the emergency room doctors who were only with the body for 10 minutes who were only concentrating on saving a life.
I have a new computer ,and honestly haven't figured it out,but there are photos Kennedy on his stomach,1 shot in his back.
Yes. This picture was taken at the autopsy, not at Parkland. The Parkland doctors never saw the wound in the back.
