Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Oswald's Light-Colored Jacket  (Read 74718 times)

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1057
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #560 on: February 16, 2018, 09:55:01 PM »
Nobody, including you, has shown that Day's claim was correct.

So Day's testimony that he knows the date the photo was taken is questionable... but Tague's testimony is 100% spot-on when he says he remembers a shot AFTER he was hit on the cheek.

And you call me the hypocrite.  LOL

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1595
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #561 on: February 16, 2018, 09:56:55 PM »
Nobody, including you, has shown that Day's claim was correct.  Too bad they didn't show Day this photo.



What insightful information could Day possibly offer about that photo?

Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7505
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #562 on: February 16, 2018, 09:58:02 PM »
So Day's testimony that he knows the date the photo was taken is questionable... but Tague's testimony is 100% spot-on when he says he remembers a shot AFTER he was hit on the cheek.

Except I didn't say that.  Nice try.

Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7505
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #563 on: February 16, 2018, 09:58:45 PM »
Someone ill-advisedly posted the photo as if it proves that the blanket and bag came in contact with each other

Strawman.

Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7505
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #564 on: February 16, 2018, 10:00:19 PM »
What insightful information could Day possibly offer about that photo?

I don't know.  Why did they think he could provide insightful information about CE 738?

Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7505
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #565 on: February 16, 2018, 10:00:46 PM »
No, you're not.

Day said that the photo was taken as they were turning the evidence over to the FBI for the 2nd time.  That, in Day's mind, timestamps the photo.

That's just your speculation.  Day didn't say what in his mind timestamped the photo.

Quote
You automatically reject it because he's a police officer and therefore, dishonest or wrong.

Nope.  You're automatically accepting it because he said so.  I'm asking how did he know?

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1057
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #566 on: February 16, 2018, 10:01:00 PM »
Except I didn't say that.  Nice try.

And Day was actually there, therefore he knows when that photo was taken.

Why is Day questionable but Tague is not?

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1057
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #567 on: February 16, 2018, 10:03:01 PM »
Strawman.

That's not a straw man at all.  Someone did indeed post the photo as if it proved that the two items came into contact with each other before they were examined.  It may have been you who made the mistake of posting that photo, but I don't really recall now.

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1595
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #568 on: February 16, 2018, 10:03:38 PM »
I don't know.  Why did they think he could provide insightful information about CE 738?

Because the photograph of the items was taken while they were in the possession of the DPD.

Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7505
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #569 on: February 16, 2018, 10:04:03 PM »
And Day was actually there, therefore he knows when that photo was taken.

Why is Day questionable but Tague is not?

Huh?  Are you saying that Tague was not there wen he was struck?

Anyway this is another strawman.  When did I say that Tague was not questionable?  Tim stated as a fact that Tague was hit by a fragment from the head shot.  I merely pointed out that Tague disagreed.

 

Mobile View