Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Oswald's Light-Colored Jacket  (Read 74199 times)

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4840
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #540 on: February 15, 2018, 11:01:21 PM »
This is Bill Brown's thought process in a nutshell:

- Thinks it's significant that fibers in the bag could have come from the blanket in the garage

- Doesn't think it's significant that the bag could have been contaminated through improper evidence handling

I believe the fibers (plural) were ON the exterior surface of the bag....there was only a single fiber found inside the sack...

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7963
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #541 on: February 15, 2018, 11:10:30 PM »
I believe the fibers (plural) were ON the exterior surface of the bag....there was only a single fiber found inside the sack...

Yes, but you never said why.

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1058
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #542 on: February 16, 2018, 12:42:14 AM »
I didn't claim that Day was wrong.  I asked you how you know Day was right.  You have no answer.

No, the photo was posted to show that there could easily have been evidence contamination.

It's not a strawman.  How do fibers allegedly found in a bag show who shot somebody?

I've already told you twice now why Day would know the date of that photo.  You ignore it, but it doesn't mean I haven't answered you.

If you can't prove that Day was wrong about the date of the photo then you're only grandstanding.  Typical.

The photo was taken three days after those items were examined by Stombaugh, so it (the photo) in no way shows that the evidence "could easily have been" contaminated before Stombaugh's analysis.
« Last Edit: February 16, 2018, 12:49:25 AM by Bill Brown »

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1058
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #543 on: February 16, 2018, 12:45:42 AM »
This is Bill Brown's thought process in a nutshell:

- Thinks it's significant that fibers in the bag could have come from the blanket in the garage

- Doesn't think it's significant that the bag could have been contaminated through improper evidence handling

When you have to lie in an attempt to prove a point, you have no credibility.

I have never said that it is insignificant that the bag could have been contaminated.  I just haven't seen anyone post anything to show that it was. 

If you wish, I can run around here attributing false statements and beliefs about you, too.  Why do you want to play that game?  Don't you think it's a bit dishonest?

Don't misrepresent my position.

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4840
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #544 on: February 16, 2018, 01:45:03 PM »
Yes, but you never said why.

This photo explains ...WHY...  There were fibers that could have come from the blanket on the exterior surface of the paper sack.   



The sack is lying on the blanket.....

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7963
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #545 on: February 16, 2018, 06:06:44 PM »
I've already told you twice now why Day would know the date of that photo.  You ignore it, but it doesn't mean I haven't answered you.

That wasn't an answer, it was a non-sequitur.  How did Day know that this photo reflected the turning over of the evidence to the FBI for the 2nd time?  What in the actual photo signifies this?

Quote
If you can't prove that Day was wrong about the date of the photo then you're only grandstanding.  Typical.

You can't prove that he was right, and so you're grandstanding.  And around we go.

Quote
The photo was taken three days after those items were examined by Stombaugh, so it (the photo) in no way shows that the evidence "could easily have been" contaminated before Stombaugh's analysis.

Another circular argument and a tautology.  The photo was taken three days after those items were examined by Stombaugh because Day said so, and Day was right because Day said so, and it doesn't show that the evidence could have been contaminated because Day was right.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7963
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #546 on: February 16, 2018, 06:16:34 PM »
When you have to lie in an attempt to prove a point, you have no credibility.

I have never said that it is insignificant that the bag could have been contaminated.  I just haven't seen anyone post anything to show that it was. 

If you wish, I can run around here attributing false statements and beliefs about you, too.  Why do you want to play that game?  Don't you think it's a bit dishonest?

Don't misrepresent my position.

I'm not misrepresenting anything -- you're special pleading.  If you thought it was significant you would acknowledge it as a possibility like you do for the fibers coming from the blanket.  I haven't seen anyone post anything to show that they did.

I also haven't seen anyone post any proof that there were 5 shots, and both a Remington bullet and a Winchester shell disappeared from the Tippit crime scene and yet not only do you put that forward as a possibility, you actually assert that this is what happened.

You're a hypocrite.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7963
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #547 on: February 16, 2018, 06:19:55 PM »
This photo explains ...WHY...  There were fibers that could have come from the blanket on the exterior surface of the paper sack.   



The sack is lying on the blanket.....

Is there anyone who examined the bag who said that there was only a single fiber found inside the sack?

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4840
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #548 on: February 16, 2018, 06:47:04 PM »
Is there anyone who examined the bag who said that there was only a single fiber found inside the sack?

Yes ....It's in an FBI report.    I made the mistake of saying that there were fibers found INSIDE of the sack  many years ago..... Someone corrected me and posted the FBI report  hat says there was only a single fiber found in the sack.

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1058
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #549 on: February 16, 2018, 07:43:51 PM »
This photo explains ...WHY...  There were fibers that could have come from the blanket on the exterior surface of the paper sack.   



The sack is lying on the blanket.....

But if that photo was taken AFTER Stombaugh analyzed the bag and found the fibers, then it means nothing.

 

Mobile View