Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Oswald's Light-Colored Jacket  (Read 73698 times)

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2641
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #500 on: February 11, 2018, 02:35:18 PM »
So now your number isn't close after all.

You're not bluffing, are you?


What on Earth are you blathering about?
Here is my original post.




Yep the chances that Markham would pick a particular random person out of four is obviously 1 in 4, then we have another 5 eyewitnesses who all had an equal chance of 1 in 4 of picking some random dude therefore when totalled means that for all the 6 eyewitnesses to choose the same random guy is close to astronomical!



JohnM



A small number < "close to astronomical" < astronomical.



JohnM

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2641
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #501 on: February 11, 2018, 02:46:22 PM »
« Last Edit: February 11, 2018, 03:02:25 PM by John Mytton »

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2641
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #502 on: February 11, 2018, 02:52:17 PM »
I would expect them to have in a fair lineup.

Do you have photos of the lineups?




Quote
I would expect them to have in a fair lineup.

So you made a statement which you had no way of knowing is true, awesome!

Quote
Do you have photos of the lineups?

Unbelievable!



JohnM

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1059
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #503 on: February 11, 2018, 04:38:21 PM »
Hahahaha, when was the CE1054 taken?


JohnM

Mid-May of '64.

So, in an attempt to suggest evidence contamination (fibers found inside the bag being a match to the blanket fibers), we have Iacoletti posting a photo of the bag and blanket in contact with each other which was taken three days AFTER the bag was analyzed and the fibers were found inside the bag and studied by Stombaugh.

Now, we have Iacoletti posting a photo of Clark, Perry and Ables (the lineup participants along with Oswald) taken almost six months after the lineups were conducted in an attempt to show that these three men didn't have visible bruises on 11/22/63.

Nuts.
« Last Edit: February 12, 2018, 01:56:58 AM by Bill Brown »

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2641
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #504 on: February 11, 2018, 11:50:15 PM »
Why a sudden need to introduce "a small number"?




No offence but since you didn't understand the concept the first couple of times I tried to dumb it down a little.



JohnM

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2641
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #505 on: February 11, 2018, 11:59:32 PM »
Do you find my proposition unreasonable?


What, that they all picked the man with the bruises, yes I find that totally unreasonable.

These eyewitnesses were just average people like you and me, and I know for certain that I would not just pick the man with the bruises and I'm sure that 6 of my family or friends would act exactly the same, why would anybody want to send anyone to the electric chair just because they had a bruise, are you for real?
Now I ask you "an average person" would you just pick the an innocent man with a bruise and would your Best Friend, Brother, Sister, Mom or Dad just pick the innocent guy with a bruise, I sincerely hope not.

And even if Oswald was the only man with a bruise which I suspect may have been the case what's the answer? I think the Geneva convention or whatever applicable law prohibits the use of force to create matching injuries.



JohnM

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1059
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #506 on: February 12, 2018, 06:27:47 PM »
The three other participants in the lineup were Dallas Police employees.
Det. R.L. Clark testified that he was wearing a white short sleeved shirt and a red vest for both lineups
Don Ables testified that he had on a white shirt and a grey knit sweater for both lineups
William Perry got a brown sports coat from the homicide office.

Below composite photo is a good indicator of what it might have looked like viewing these line ups
it appears to be an obvious set up





It's amazing that you really believe that the composite photo is a "good indicator" of what the lineups might have looked like to the witnesses.

Do you seriously believe either Clark, Ables or Perry wore a suit and tie?

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1059
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #507 on: February 12, 2018, 06:55:16 PM »
nice distraction...Where do I say anybody wore a suit & tie?
I was clear in my first line what each man was wearing

Mr. Ball: The other three were better dressed than Oswald, would you say?
Det. Boyd: Well, yes, sir; I would say they probably were.

can you read or just not comprehend?


You're the goofball who insisted (at least three times) that I deleted a post in an attempt to hide something, yet the post is still there to this day... and you question another's ability to read and comprehend?

Anyway, you most definitely said that the "composite photo is a good indicator of what it might have looked like viewing these line ups".


Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1059
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #508 on: February 12, 2018, 08:01:54 PM »
More distractions in an obvious set up  -and of course insults when there is no proof
 and how does "good indicator" mean they wore suit & tie

No proof?  What am I trying to prove here?  I'm just pointing out your foolish statement.

Moving on.

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2641
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #509 on: February 12, 2018, 08:02:32 PM »

You're the goofball who insisted (at least three times) that I deleted a post in an attempt to hide something, yet the post is still there to this day... and you question another's ability to read and comprehend?

Anyway, you most definitely said that the "composite photo is a good indicator of what it might have looked like viewing these line ups".





Capasse has never been honest a day in his life, in the following image he posted we know Ables is 5'9" and Oswald was 5'9" but he made Oswald much shorter than Ables. Capasse's history with BS manipulative images is well known.





JohnM

 

Mobile View