Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Oswald's Light-Colored Jacket  (Read 73492 times)

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1059
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #490 on: February 10, 2018, 02:38:34 AM »
Oh brother.  How many "moments" are in a minute?  When did Callaway ever say "moments" anyway?

Correction:

Markham saw a man shoot Tippit who she identified as Oswald in an unfair lineup.
Scoggins saw a man going south on Patton who he identified as Oswald in an unfair lineup.
The Davis sisters-in-law saw a man going across their lawn who they identified as Oswald in an unfair lineup.
Callaway saw a man running south on Patton who he identified as Oswald in an unfair lineup.

That doesn't necessarily mean that they all saw Oswald or that they even saw the same man.

Well then feel free to prove that these witnesses saw different men.

Claim the lineups were unfair.  Okay.

Claim the witness identification was wrong and it was not Oswald who they saw.  Okay.

But, to claim that these witnesses saw different men is dangerously close to taking up residence in Kookville.

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2637
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #491 on: February 10, 2018, 03:10:33 AM »
So people impersonating SS agents gives you no pause? Of course not as you have your patsy already picked out.



Quote
So people impersonating SS agents gives you no pause?

Sure if you had some corroboration and your SS agents were somewhere closer to Elm street but alas all you have is the word of one person seeing SS agents somewhere in the suburbs, so what?

Quote
Of course not as you have your patsy already picked out.

You say Oswald was a lousy shot and liked Kennedy, who in their right mind would pick Oswald to be a Patsy?



JohnM

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2637
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #492 on: February 10, 2018, 03:16:01 AM »
Btw, how much is "astronomical"?




A lot more than "close to astronomical"!



JohnM

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2637
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #493 on: February 10, 2018, 03:17:59 AM »
They picked the guy with the bruised face.

That was easy.



Quote
They picked the guy with the bruised face.

That was easy.

So none of the other guys had any bruises? cite?



JohnM

Offline Gary Craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 909
« Last Edit: February 10, 2018, 03:06:43 PM by Gary Craig »

Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8579
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #495 on: February 10, 2018, 07:42:07 PM »
The report was posted in my series already. Unfortunately this site was hacked and it is gone. I will repost it sometime in the future, but the evidence is still there.

Detective Marvin Buhk's report to Curry.

Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8579
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #496 on: February 10, 2018, 07:45:26 PM »
Well then feel free to prove that these witnesses saw different men.

Claim the lineups were unfair.  Okay.

Claim the witness identification was wrong and it was not Oswald who they saw.  Okay.

But, to claim that these witnesses saw different men is dangerously close to taking up residence in Kookville.

You only think so because your entire argument rests on that, since almost none of your "witnesses" actually witnessed a crime.

Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8579
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #497 on: February 10, 2018, 07:48:20 PM »
No bruises or gashes on any of these guys' eyes, either.


Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1059
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #498 on: February 11, 2018, 12:34:17 PM »
You only think so because your entire argument rests on that, since almost none of your "witnesses" actually witnessed a crime.


I rest my case.

But, to claim that these witnesses saw different men is dangerously close to taking up residence in Kookville.

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1059
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #499 on: February 11, 2018, 12:49:43 PM »
They picked the guy with the bruised face.

That was easy.

So none of the other guys had any bruises? cite?

JohnM

No bruises or gashes on any of these guys' eyes, either.



Exactly how long do you feel that a bruise should linger?

That photo you posted of the lineup participants was taken over five and a half months after the lineups.

I'm not arguing that any of the lineup participants actually had a bruise on their face, even though it can't be ruled out.  But, what does posting a photo of the participants taken almost six months later do to prove how these men looked on 11/22/63?  Please explain. 



« Last Edit: February 11, 2018, 12:56:45 PM by Bill Brown »

 

Mobile View