Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Oswald's Light-Colored Jacket  (Read 141178 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #456 on: February 09, 2018, 06:06:26 PM »
Advertisement
Lee Oswald, the man who witnesses identified as wearing a jacket.

LOL.  In unfair lineups.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #456 on: February 09, 2018, 06:06:26 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #457 on: February 09, 2018, 06:08:31 PM »
Mr. WESTBROOK. That is exactly the jacket we found.

Still haven't figured out who "we" is?

And how did Westbrook make the determination that this was exactly the jacket "we" found?

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1763
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #458 on: February 09, 2018, 06:10:29 PM »
LOL.  In unfair lineups.

Debatable.  But, even if true, is that somehow supposed to mean that Helen Markham, William Scoggins, Barbara Davis, Virginia Davis, Ted Callaway and Sam Guinyard actually saw someone other than Oswald?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #458 on: February 09, 2018, 06:10:29 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #459 on: February 09, 2018, 06:12:24 PM »
Yes.  There's no baby in that filthy bathwater.

There's no proof of an alternate shooter in CTroll wonderland
There's no proof that anyone but the killer ( 'random guy' ) knew that an attempt was to be made on Kennedy that day


Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #460 on: February 09, 2018, 06:29:11 PM »
Why was he living under an assumed name...

Spies are known to occasionally use an alias.....  Lee had been trained as a US intelligence agent ....

But your question is interesting....   When Fritz asked, Lee readily admitted that he was registered as O.H. Lee  at the rooming house.....   He told Fritz that Mrs Roberts made the error when he rented the room...

I don't know if that is true.....  So it raises an interesting question......

WHO was Lee hiding from?....   We know that FBI agent Hosty claimed that was looking for him...and Lee was aware that Hosty was looking for him.....BUT..... Hosty knew that he was working in the TSBD...and Lee tried to contact Hosty when he left the note at the FBI office......

Who was Lee trying to avoid?......

« Last Edit: February 09, 2018, 06:30:50 PM by Walt Cakebread »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #460 on: February 09, 2018, 06:29:11 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #461 on: February 09, 2018, 06:39:02 PM »
There's no proof of an alternate shooter in CTroll wonderland

...or your shooter for that matter.

Quote
There's no proof that anyone but the killer ( 'random guy' ) knew that an attempt was to be made on Kennedy that day

Who said otherwise?

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #462 on: February 09, 2018, 06:43:06 PM »
Debatable.  But, even if true, is that somehow supposed to mean that Helen Markham, William Scoggins, Barbara Davis, Virginia Davis, Ted Callaway and Sam Guinyard actually saw someone other than Oswald?

They very well could have, since invalid lineups are invalid.  But since only one of them actually witnessed a crime, I'm not sure how it matters much who the other people saw.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #462 on: February 09, 2018, 06:43:06 PM »


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4236
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #463 on: February 09, 2018, 06:58:41 PM »
Debatable.  But, even if true, is that somehow supposed to mean that Helen Markham, William Scoggins, Barbara Davis, Virginia Davis, Ted Callaway and Sam Guinyard actually saw someone other than Oswald?




Yep the chances that Markham would pick a particular random person out of four is obviously 1 in 4, then we have another 5 eyewitnesses who all had an equal chance of 1 in 4 of picking some random dude therefore when totalled means that for all the 6 eyewitnesses to choose the same random guy is close to astronomical!



JohnM