Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Oswald's Light-Colored Jacket  (Read 74403 times)

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1057
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #450 on: February 09, 2018, 05:10:48 PM »
Only in the closed mind of a LN.

For sane rational people it is beyond obvious that this half blind, not paying much attention, woman isn't really sure of anything at all.

You and Brown can try to spin it as much as you like but with "maybe it was" you haven't got much of anything.


Quote
For sane rational people it is beyond obvious that this half blind, not paying much attention, woman isn't really sure of anything at all.

No.  This is a flat out lie.

If it's one thing Roberts was sure of, it's that whatever Oswald was wearing as he went out the door, he was zipping it up.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7483
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #451 on: February 09, 2018, 05:47:44 PM »
So all of those people saw Oswald wearing a jacket.  Regardless of what color they said that jacket was, they still saw him wearing one.  Why would he ditch the jacket?

Who's "he"?

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7483
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #452 on: February 09, 2018, 05:53:43 PM »
This is why it's so easy, on one hand you endorse Markham as a Screwball then you use her as your eyewitness?

She was a screwball.  That doesn't entitle you to misrepresent what she did say by cherry-picking "light short jacket" and ignoring everything else.

Quote
Btw show me one murder case in the history of the world where the killer was freed because of a slight clothing shade variation?

Then why are you even bothering to make a case (badly I might add) that they all saw a light-colored jacket?

Quote
She was looking directly at the jacket and positively identified it and if in her language she said it was a shirt, trousers or a concrete mixer, that's all irrelevant, she saw Oswald's jacket and identified it as belonging to Lee. Case Closed!

That doesn't make it true.  Marina said a lot of things.  On what basis did she make that determination?  Case open.

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1057
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #453 on: February 09, 2018, 05:54:42 PM »
Who's "he"?

Lee Oswald, the man who witnesses identified as wearing a jacket.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7483
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #454 on: February 09, 2018, 05:55:51 PM »
Why was he living under an assumed name...

Because he wanted to kill the president of course.  There could be no other reason.   ::)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7483
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #455 on: February 09, 2018, 06:01:55 PM »
So they weren't so professional, ok I agree. Now what? Does that mean we throw the baby out with the bath water?

Yes.  There's no baby in that filthy bathwater.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7483
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #456 on: February 09, 2018, 06:06:26 PM »
Lee Oswald, the man who witnesses identified as wearing a jacket.

LOL.  In unfair lineups.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7483
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #457 on: February 09, 2018, 06:08:31 PM »
Mr. WESTBROOK. That is exactly the jacket we found.

Still haven't figured out who "we" is?

And how did Westbrook make the determination that this was exactly the jacket "we" found?

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1057
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #458 on: February 09, 2018, 06:10:29 PM »
LOL.  In unfair lineups.

Debatable.  But, even if true, is that somehow supposed to mean that Helen Markham, William Scoggins, Barbara Davis, Virginia Davis, Ted Callaway and Sam Guinyard actually saw someone other than Oswald?

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3407
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #459 on: February 09, 2018, 06:12:24 PM »
Yes.  There's no baby in that filthy bathwater.

There's no proof of an alternate shooter in CTroll wonderland
There's no proof that anyone but the killer ( 'random guy' ) knew that an attempt was to be made on Kennedy that day


 

Mobile View