Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Oswald's Light-Colored Jacket  (Read 74626 times)

Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2472
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #120 on: January 22, 2018, 12:52:53 AM »

DUH! Of course before Oswald came in her focus was on trying to see the television and find out about the shooting of her President but where do you get the idea that while Oswald was at the Rooming house, Earlene was paying more attention to the television because she seems to go into some detail describing Oswald's movements as he hurried in and how he was zippering up on the way out?

JohnM

where do you get the idea that while Oswald was at the Rooming house, Earlene was paying more attention to the television

Stupid question. The answer is; because she said it!

because she seems to go into some detail describing Oswald's movements as he hurried in and how he was zippering up on the way out?

What movements? Oswald's room was next to the living room. To get from the front door to the room (or viceversa) took perhaps 5 seconds. The television was placed in such a way that if Roberts was looking at it she would have her back to Oswald as he moved through the room.

Add to this that she had bad eyesight and was well known for making up stuff and you have your answer.

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2637
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #121 on: January 22, 2018, 12:57:30 AM »
You're right, why bother?





Exactly, you got nothing, Earlene held down a steady job that required her to see and she was trying to get her television working.



JohnM


Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2472
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #122 on: January 22, 2018, 12:57:57 AM »


I have produced a list of Eight eyewitnesses who all identified a light coloured jacket, give me your alternate list of eyewitnesses who identified a differently described jacket.

Here I'll give you a start;

Mr. BALL. How is it different?
Mrs. DAVIS. Well, it was dark and to me it looked like it was maybe a wool fabric, it looked sort of rough. Like more of a sporting jacket.


Now give me some more eyewitnesses so that you can support your above post????   Waiting....  Yawn!!!!.....

JohnM

She did not witness the shooting and was no Tippit eyewitness.

Also, she decribes the so-called "light coloured jacket" as dark and fails to identify CE 162 as the jacket she had seen.

Mr. BALL. I have a jacket, I would like to show you, which is Commission Exhibit No. 162. Does this look anything like the jacket that the man had on that was going across your lawn?
Mrs. DAVIS. No, sir.
Mr. BALL. How is it different?
Mrs. DAVIS. Well, it was dark and to me it looked like it was maybe a wool fabric, it looked sort of rough. Like more of a sporting jacket.

Wanna give it another try?

Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2472
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #123 on: January 22, 2018, 12:59:39 AM »

Exactly, you got nothing, Earlene held down a steady job that required her to see and she was trying to get her television working.

JohnM

Actually, she had been fired several times from that job. You kinda forgot about that, didn't you?

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2637
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #124 on: January 22, 2018, 01:05:01 AM »
Wasn't that supposed to be CE 162?

Mr. BALL. I have here an exhibit, Commission Exhibit 162, a jacket. Did you ever see this before?
Mrs. MARKHAM. No; I did not.




As usual you short change someones testimony to suit your endless quest to discover a conspiracy.

Let's read the full testimony, Markham describes the same style of jacket but she saw the jacket outside in the sunlight as opposed to seeing the jacket inside which has an obvious effect on ones perception of shading.

Mr. BALL. I have here an exhibit, Commission Exhibit 162, a jacket. Did you ever see this before?
Mrs. MARKHAM. No; I did not.
Mr. BALL. Does it look like, anything like, the jacket the man had on?
Mrs. MARKHAM. It is short, open down the front. But that jacket it is a darker jacket than that, I know it was.






JohnM

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2637
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #125 on: January 22, 2018, 01:07:22 AM »
She did not witness the shooting and was no Tippit eyewitness.

Also, she decribes the so-called "light coloured jacket" as dark and fails to identify CE 162 as the jacket she had seen.

Mr. BALL. I have a jacket, I would like to show you, which is Commission Exhibit No. 162. Does this look anything like the jacket that the man had on that was going across your lawn?
Mrs. DAVIS. No, sir.
Mr. BALL. How is it different?
Mrs. DAVIS. Well, it was dark and to me it looked like it was maybe a wool fabric, it looked sort of rough. Like more of a sporting jacket.

Wanna give it another try?



You were wrong Martin, the vast majority of eyewitnesses described a light coloured jacket.



JohnM

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2637
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #126 on: January 22, 2018, 01:10:10 AM »
Wait, you didn't actually leave?





Whaaaat? That post wasn't directed to you, next time you better check which account you are responding



JohnM

Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2472
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #127 on: January 22, 2018, 01:13:31 AM »

As usual you short change someones testimony to suit your endless quest to discover a conspiracy.

Let's read the full testimony, Markham describes the same style of jacket but she saw the jacket outside in the sunlight as opposed to seeing the jacket inside which has an obvious effect on ones perception of shading.

Mr. BALL. I have here an exhibit, Commission Exhibit 162, a jacket. Did you ever see this before?
Mrs. MARKHAM. No; I did not.
Mr. BALL. Does it look like, anything like, the jacket the man had on?
Mrs. MARKHAM. It is short, open down the front. But that jacket it is a darker jacket than that, I know it was.






JohnM

Let's read the full testimony, Markham describes the same style of jacket but she saw the jacket outside in the sunlight as opposed to seeing the jacket inside which has an obvious effect on ones perception of shading.

Now who is misrepresenting Markham's testimony?

She clearly states that she did not see CE 162 before and that the jacket she had seen was darker than that.

It is you who comes up with crappy mumbo jumbo excuses about sunlight and shades to "explain" why she did not recognize CE 162!

Pathetic!

As usual you short change someones testimony to suit your endless quest to discover a conspiracy.

Please explain how somebody shooting Tippit would automatically result in the discovery of a conspiracy to kill Kennedy?

Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2472
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #128 on: January 22, 2018, 01:14:37 AM »

You were wrong Martin, the vast majority of eyewitnesses described a light coloured jacket.

JohnM

Repeating a lie doesn't make it true.

So, no other try for you?

Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2472
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #129 on: January 22, 2018, 01:15:49 AM »

Whaaaat? That post wasn't directed to you, next time you better check which account you are responding

JohnM

It was directed at me, yet you are still here.... Go figure

 

Mobile View