Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Oswald's Light-Colored Jacket  (Read 74762 times)

Offline Gary Craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 889
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #90 on: January 20, 2018, 02:17:12 PM »
Prove that a man who normally wears a size small jacket would appear to others to be wearing a jacket too large for his size if he was wearing a jacket sized medium.

LOL, the goofy Bill Brown diversion question - classic.

Ozzie's accusers (look in the mirror) are the ones claiming he was wearing a jacket a size too big.

Why do I need to prove it?

I'm asking for validation in the form of a affidavit, testimony or anything else from one of the dozen

witnesses who allegedly saw him wearing the jacket.

A least one of them should have noticed.

« Last Edit: January 20, 2018, 02:22:25 PM by Gary Craig »

Offline Gary Craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 889
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #91 on: January 20, 2018, 02:38:46 PM »

This is your so called American Justice, I can murder someone in broad daylight in front of eyewitnesses and then get seen running away by almost a dozen people, most of which see me with the same type of gun that killed the man, drop shells that match my revolver, whack the Police Officer that tries to search me, then I try and kill him too and all I need is Iacoletti Inc. to misrepresent the eyewitnesses and I'm magically innocent. Holy WOW Batman!

JohnM

You are innocent until proven guilty.

In American Justice when you get accused of crimes you have the right to legal representation to

protect your rights and present exculpatory evidence at trial etc.

It also requires LE to keep the defendant safe while in custody.

 etc. etc. etc.
« Last Edit: January 20, 2018, 03:08:58 PM by Gary Craig »

Offline Jerry Organ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1002
    • Plaza 3D
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #92 on: January 20, 2018, 05:01:56 PM »
Presumption of innocence applies to a jury not presuming the defendant is guilty just because he's on trial. Otherwise the judge can't claim it's a fair trial.

Jury members can presume the defendant is guilty, innocent or be neutral about it. There's no way to perceive or enforce what human beings on a jury are thinking.

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2476
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #93 on: January 20, 2018, 06:17:31 PM »
Presumption of innocence applies to a jury not presuming the defendant is guilty just because he's on trial. Otherwise the judge can't claim it's a fair trial.

Jury members can presume the defendant is guilty, innocent or be neutral about it. There's no way to perceive or enforce what human beings on a jury are thinking.

Which is why there is the process of jury selection...

Offline Jerry Organ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1002
    • Plaza 3D
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #94 on: January 20, 2018, 06:40:38 PM »
Which is why there is the process of jury selection...

One can only ask what a potential juror thinks, and hope for an honest response. One can't perceive or enforce a juror's impartiality because they can't see what's in their mind.

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2476
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #95 on: January 20, 2018, 06:58:33 PM »
One can only ask what a potential juror thinks, and hope for an honest response. One can't perceive or enforce a juror's impartiality because they can't see what's in their mind.

True.. that's why nobody can really predict what the outcome of a trial by jury is going to be.

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1057
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #96 on: January 20, 2018, 11:08:00 PM »
LOL, the goofy Bill Brown diversion question - classic.

Ozzie's accusers (look in the mirror) are the ones claiming he was wearing a jacket a size too big.

Why do I need to prove it?

I'm asking for validation in the form of a affidavit, testimony or anything else from one of the dozen

witnesses who allegedly saw him wearing the jacket.

A least one of them should have noticed.

What are you talking about?  Ted Callaway, just for quick reference, positively identified the jacket (CE-162) as being the one that Oswald had on as he ran down Patton.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3420
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #97 on: January 21, 2018, 12:54:46 AM »
LNers would be wise to refer to the 'killer' or 'prime suspect' rather than Oswald. Otherwise all these arguments go nowhere. CTers have a point-of-view as well.

'We don't see things as they are; we see things as WE are'--- Anais Nin
« Last Edit: January 21, 2018, 12:58:04 AM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1057
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #98 on: January 21, 2018, 01:01:25 AM »
LNers would be wise to refer to the 'killer' or 'prime suspect' rather than Oswald. Otherwise all these arguments go nowhere. CTers have a point-of-view as well.

'We don't see things as they are; we see things as WE are'--- Anais Nin

I do, many times.  But for Callaway's purposes, I named Oswald because Callaway knew it was Oswald.

Offline Jerry Organ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1002
    • Plaza 3D
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #99 on: January 21, 2018, 02:49:03 AM »
So CE 162 had tan in it?

Callaway testified it was: "a light tannish gray windbreaker jacket".



 

 

Mobile View