Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Oswald's Light-Colored Jacket  (Read 73697 times)

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2641
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #60 on: January 19, 2018, 02:05:19 AM »
I was referring to real witnesses, people who actually saw something.

How did real witnesses like Benavides, Markham and Scoggins manage to not notice this second assailant?

In October of 1964, Wright told George and Patricia Nash that he saw the assailant get into his car and drive away, heading west on Tenth Street.  Acquilla Clemmons told Mark Lane that the two men both left on foot.  Which one of them do you want to rely on?

This doesn't even take into account the fact that Wright changed his story later.  He told reporter Earl Golz that the assailant didn't get into his car after all, saying that the man ran alongside the car yelling at the driver as the driver sped off (supposedly straight towards Clemmons, by the way).




Quote
In October of 1964, Wright told George and Patricia Nash that he saw the assailant get into his car and drive away, heading west on Tenth Street.  Acquilla Clemmons told Mark Lane that the two men both left on foot.  Which one of them do you want to rely on?



Ouch!
That's the difference, this happens time and time again, our eyewitnesses are all corroborated because their recollections are based on reality whereas the conspiracy eyewitnesses are totally inconsistent because they don't have a foundation in truth. That's why Iacoletti never supports his claims with evidence because upon scrutiny they all fall apart.


JohnM

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2641
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #61 on: January 19, 2018, 02:35:46 AM »
The actual (something that you ignore) shows that the jacket found was WHITE. Live with it.







Stop trying to change the law of physics, it's scientifically demonstrable that Oswald's jacket under strong sunlight looks white. Cmon Caprio, if this is all you got then you got zilch!





JohnM

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2641
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #62 on: January 19, 2018, 02:41:00 AM »
Duh, chain of custody.





The chain of custody is clear, what's your problem this time?



JohnM

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2641
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #63 on: January 19, 2018, 02:42:31 AM »
So was it a shirt or "sort of a jacket?"




Oswald's garment was in front of Marina and she knew it as Oswald's.



JohnM

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1059
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #64 on: January 19, 2018, 04:08:40 AM »
I was referring to real witnesses, people who actually saw something.

How did real witnesses like Benavides, Markham and Scoggins manage to not notice this second assailant?

In October of 1964, Wright told George and Patricia Nash that he saw the assailant get into his car and drive away, heading west on Tenth Street.  Acquilla Clemmons told Mark Lane that the two men both left on foot.  Which one of them do you want to rely on?

This doesn't even take into account the fact that Wright changed his story later.  He told reporter Earl Golz that the assailant didn't get into his car after all, saying that the man ran alongside the car yelling at the driver as the driver sped off (supposedly straight towards Clemmons, by the way).

Ouch!
That's the difference, this happens time and time again, our eyewitnesses are all corroborated because their recollections are based on reality whereas the conspiracy eyewitnesses are totally inconsistent because they don't have a foundation in truth. That's why Iacoletti never supports his claims with evidence because upon scrutiny they all fall apart.


JohnM

Indeed.

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1059
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #65 on: January 19, 2018, 04:10:43 AM »

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3360
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #66 on: January 19, 2018, 07:22:42 AM »




The chain of custody is clear, what's your problem this time?

JohnM

If the chain of custody is clear, then provide it for us.....

Who found the jacket, who handled it, who took it to the police station and who handed it into the evidence room and when?

Who initialed the jacket and when?

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3360
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #67 on: January 19, 2018, 07:31:07 AM »

Oswald's garment was in front of Marina and she knew it as Oswald's.

JohnM

Yeah, according to her testimony, she thought it was a shirt.  ;D

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1059
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #68 on: January 19, 2018, 05:04:00 PM »
Why would I believe that when Markham said he ran west on 10th across Patton taking the alley going west?

An obvious mistake, right?  From Tenth Street the killer couldn't have entered any alley going west.  Are you not aware of that?

However, from Tippit's patrol car, one could run west on Tenth Street to Patton, run a half block down Patton and then enter the alley "going west".

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1059
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #69 on: January 19, 2018, 05:05:50 PM »
Notice board on dash...

Mr. BARNES. That is a board, a clipboard that is installed on the dash of all squad cars for the officers to take notes on and to keep their wanted persons.

Should be interesting reading...

Mr. BELIN. It appears to be there is a picture of some man on the clipboard. Did you notice whether or not there was any handwriting or any memorandum paper on the board?
Mr. BARNES. I couldn't tell you what was on the clipboard.

Could BARNES be lying?

Belin was wrong.  There was no picture of a man on the clipboard.

What would Barnes be lying about?  Do tell.
« Last Edit: January 20, 2018, 12:08:23 AM by Bill Brown »

 

Mobile View