Oswald's Light-Colored Jacket

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Oswald's Light-Colored Jacket  (Read 460372 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #35 on: January 19, 2018, 12:44:55 AM »
Uh, you haven't actually demonstrated that CE-162 was Oswald's jacket or was even ever on Oswald.

Actually, and even worse, the entire claim that Oswald left the roominghouse wearing a jacket is based completely on the statements of one woman, who by her own admission was paying more attention to getting the TV to work and who her employer warned the WC about as she was known for "making up tales".

There is no corroboration for the claim that Oswald left the roominghouse wearing a jacket.

But the same guys will jump up and down about how Frazier was not paying attention to the bag.

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5118
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #36 on: January 19, 2018, 12:45:39 AM »
Somebody was wearing a jacket.  There's no good reason to think that it was the same guy Brewer saw.




Yeah, Brewer saw that Oswald imposter, the one who was 5'11", fatter, uglier and had a mom who was a beauty queen, or something like that, you CK's are hilarious!



JohnM

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #37 on: January 19, 2018, 12:49:57 AM »
Yet, none of them say that there were two assailants.

Acquilla Clemons did.  So did Frank Wright.

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5118
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #38 on: January 19, 2018, 12:51:41 AM »
Can you prove that those fibers came from that shirt to the exclusion of any other shirt?




Iacoletti, you've been told, the prohibitive probability is that those fibers came from the shirt Oswald was wearing.
Oswald's rifle and now in addition we have Oswald's jacket having matching fibers to Oswald's shirt, so we can exponentially increase the original prohibitive probability to the power of ten, your client is fcuked!



JohnM

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2007
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #39 on: January 19, 2018, 12:51:58 AM »
Somebody was wearing a jacket.  There's no good reason to think that it was the same guy Brewer saw.

Many witnesses positively identified Oswald in the vicinity of Tenth and Patton, running with a gun in his hands and wearing a jacket.

Brewer saw a guy, who he said was Oswald, without a jacket.

Each of us can, on our own, choose to determine how much credibility to give these witnesses.  Some can accept the obvious, that the witnesses near Tenth and Patton saw the same man that Brewer saw.  Others can jump through any hoop that they have to in order to place guilt on anyone other than the actual cop-killer.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #40 on: January 19, 2018, 12:52:06 AM »
The jacket was a size medium.  Oswald was a size small.  God forbid (with apologies to John Iacoletti) a small man should ever wear a medium sized jacket.

Is this supposed to somehow prove that CE162 was Oswald's jacket?

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #41 on: January 19, 2018, 12:53:09 AM »
But John, the jacket was a Medium, not a Small.  LOL

But Bill, none of these people witnessed a crime.  LOL.