Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Oswald's Light-Colored Jacket  (Read 74766 times)

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1595
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #700 on: June 03, 2018, 03:00:38 AM »
He is as close as anyone. He sent the transmission and he didn't say anyone else found it.

He didn't say that he found it either.

 
Quote
Explain why he said the jacket is white.

He said the jacket was white for the same reason that people would say the the jacket seen in the pics below is white.






Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2476
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #701 on: June 03, 2018, 03:01:55 AM »
You're right again, Johnboi.

By itself, Brewer witnessing someone acting suspiciously and taking action which led to your hero being apprehended isn't evidence of murder.

However, it does destroy your narrative that Brewer just saw 'a person' walking towards the theater. There's no doubt that the person Brewer saw, entered the theater, and that person's name was Lee Harvey Oswald, AKA Saint Oz.

The same Saint Oz who wasn't wearing a jacket when arrested but whose shirt fibers were found in the jacket ditched under a car in a lot through which JDT's assailent fled.

Poor Saint Oz was having a really, really bad day.


Next up: Hairless goofball says Oswald's shirt fibers in a jacket aren't evidence of murder.

whose shirt fibers were found in the jacket ditched under a car in a lot

So you can actually prove conclusively that the grey jacket now in evidence as CE 162 is the jacket found under a car in a lot?

Care to amaze us all?

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2476
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #702 on: June 03, 2018, 03:04:02 AM »
He didn't say that he found it either.

 
He said the jacket was white for the same reason that people would say the the jacket seen in the pics below is white.





He said the jacket was white for the same reason that people would say the the jacket seen in the pics below is white.

How in the world would you know what reason he had for saying the jacket was white?

Also, did he look at the jacket under the same lightning conditions as those when the photo was taken?

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1057
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #703 on: June 03, 2018, 03:25:17 AM »
Earlene was so blind, I'm surprised she even had a television !

Oh, and of course she had her back turned the entire time Saint Oz was leaving the boarding house.

The poor blind woman couldn't have possibly averted her attention from the TV that she was incapable of watching, not even for a moment to vainly try and see who was walking in and out of the house.

And even if she was able to actually turn her head and see Saint Oz she couldn't possibly tell if he was wearing a jacket.

Nope, at best she might have heard someone she assumed to be Saint Oz zipping a jacket.

Ain't that right, kooks ?

EARLENE WASN'T HALF AS BLIND AS THE DROOLING SAINT OZ FANBOIS ARE

It is extreme desperation to claim that Earlene Roberts was half-blind and couldn't possibly be able to see Oswald wearing a jacket (and even zipping it up).

It is nothing more than a lame (and desperate) Weidmann argument.  Pathetic really.

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1057
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #704 on: June 03, 2018, 03:41:21 AM »
Brewer didn't see the person he was watching from behind way down the street even enter the theater.

Since Julia Postal left the ticket booth to walk out towards the sidewalk to see the police cars, who do you suppose would have sold a ticket to Oswald before he entered?  I can't wait to hear this one.

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2476
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #705 on: June 03, 2018, 03:41:34 AM »
Mrs. ROBERTS. Well, you know, I can't see too good how to read. I'm completely blind in my right eye.


It is extreme desperation to claim that Buell Wesley Frazier, who had 20/20 vision and saw Oswald for much longer that Earlene Roberts was mistaken about what he saw.... Oswald carrying the package in the cup of his hand and tucked under his armpit!

It is nothing more than a lame (and desperate) Brown argument.  Pathetic really.

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1057
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #706 on: June 03, 2018, 03:42:35 AM »
So what?  Marrion Baker said he was wearing a light brown jacket and on the 3rd or 4th floor.

"About 1:30 pm I saw a man standing in the lobby of the shoe store. This man was wearing a brown sport shirt. He also acted as if he was scared." - Johnny Brewer

Mr. BELIN - So you say he was about 5'9"?
Mr. BREWER - About 5'9".
Mr. BELIN - And about 150?
Mr. BREWER - And had brown hair. He had a brown sports shirt on. His shirt tail was out.
Mr. BELIN - Any jacket?
Mr. BREWER - No.

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1057
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #707 on: June 03, 2018, 03:47:10 AM »
"Oswald".  LOL.

Mr. BALL. Does it look like, anything like, the jacket the man had on?
Mrs. MARKHAM. It is short, open down the front. but that jacket it is a darker jacket than that, I know it was.
Mr. BALL. You don't think it was as light a jacket as that?
Mrs. MARKHAM. No, it was darker than that, I know it was.....

What's your point?  Markham saw Oswald wearing a jacket, regardless of what color she believed it to be.

It doesn't matter if Markham believed the jacket was bright red.

She saw the same man seen by Ted Callaway, who said Oswald was wearing a light Eisenhower-type jacket.

Regardless of what color Markham believed the jacket to be, why wasn't Oswald wearing that jacket when seen by Brewer and when he was arrested inside the theater?

Offline Howard Gee

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #708 on: June 03, 2018, 03:48:02 AM »
whose shirt fibers were found in the jacket ditched under a car in a lot

So you can actually prove conclusively that the grey jacket now in evidence as CE 162 is the jacket found under a car in a lot?

Care to amaze us all?

You mean the pictures the esteemed Tim Nickerson just posted are of a grey jacket ?

Looks white to me.

Can you prove the jacket now in evidence was substituted for the one found and Saint Oz's shirt fibers were planted in it ?

You were doing better when you were contesting whether the half blind woman could see if Saint Oz was wearing a jacket.

BTW, Marty, got a huge kick out of you pointing out that the half blind woman might have been watching a TV that she didn't own.

That would make a world of difference !

Pathetic.

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1057
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #709 on: June 03, 2018, 03:51:52 AM »
...in biased and unfair lineups or from a single photo months later.

But is this supposed to prove who shot Tippit?


All of the witnesses saw a gun in Oswald's hands.  You made the ill-advised attempt to imply that these witnesses saw nothing more than Oswald as being "a person near or some distance away from the scene of the shooting".  You conveniently left out the part where each witness stated he was running with a gun.

 

Mobile View