Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Oswald's Light-Colored Jacket  (Read 74740 times)

Offline Mike Orr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 334
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #630 on: May 29, 2018, 11:19:09 PM »
Maybe the White jacket belonged to the person who killed J.D. Tippit . Once again , that was a hell of a shot by Oswald to shoot Tippit from the Texas Theater and of course they would tie him in to the assassination of JFK, which of course was another hell of a shot since Oswald was in the breakroom at the TSBD . LNers , give it up ! You didn't have a case back then and you don't have a case now ! Give it up ! I would hate to get your take on 9/11 and the first 3 concrete and steel buildings to collapse , Ever , and building 7 was not ever hit by a plane as it fell into it's own footprints as did both of the "Twin Towers" as in just like a Controlled Demolition !!!!!

Offline Howard Gee

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #631 on: May 29, 2018, 11:27:55 PM »
I knew the significance of the jacket being found before Saint Oz was arrested would be lost on his fanboi cult.

The fanboi droolers are so predictable.

Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7505
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #632 on: May 29, 2018, 11:35:08 PM »
I knew the significance of the jacket being found before Saint Oz was arrested would be lost on his fanboi cult.

The fanboi droolers are so predictable.

LOL.  Something isn't "significant" just because the cowardly troll boy wants it to be.  Answer the question, Howard:

Do you have any good reasons to believe that CE 162

a) was the jacket found in the parking lot?
b) belonged to Oswald?
c) demonstrates anything at all about who killed Tippit?

Here's your chance to show that you have something other than schoolboy insults.

Offline Howard Gee

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #633 on: May 29, 2018, 11:55:49 PM »
LOL.  Something isn't "significant" just because the cowardly troll boy wants it to be.  Answer the question, Howard:

Do you have any good reasons to believe that CE 162

a) was the jacket found in the parking lot?
b) belonged to Oswald?
c) demonstrates anything at all about who killed Tippit?

Here's your chance to show that you have something other than schoolboy insults.

Cowardly troll boy ???

Another bad hair day, I guess.

Sorry Johnny, I've already explained why the jacket being found before Saint Oz was arrested is significant.

Can't make you understand something above your intelligence and pay level.
« Last Edit: May 29, 2018, 11:58:24 PM by Howard Gee »

Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7505
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #634 on: May 30, 2018, 12:01:37 AM »
Sorry Johnny, I've already explained why the bag being found before Saint Oz was arrested is significant.

You didn't explain anything.  You just declared that it was significant because of something you imagined your strawman "conspirators" wouldn't do.

And you have the nerve to call what others write "comedy".

Still waiting on the answers...


Offline Howard Gee

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #635 on: May 30, 2018, 12:31:55 AM »
I clearly explained why the jacket being found BEFORE Saint Oz was arrested is significant.

It's still there for you to see and for anyone else that wants to read it.

No strawman.

Can't help you anymore than that Johnny.

CAN'T FIX STUPID

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2505
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #636 on: May 30, 2018, 04:20:37 AM »

And in this matter, the fanbois would be right. It would be exculpatory evidence. It would be hard to imagine Saint Oz wearing two jackets. 

 

2nd Testimony of Oswald's 'cab driver' Wm Whaley..

Quote
The CHAIRMAN. Mr. Whaley, the purpose of our meeting today is to take some further testimony concerning the events surrounding the assassination of President Kennedy, and we understand you have some facts that will bear on it in a way and we would like to ask you questions concerning it.
*******************************************************
Mr. BALL. Did you notice how he was dressed?
Mr. WHALEY. Yes, sir. I didn't pay much attention to it right then. But it all came back when I really found out who I had. He was dressed in just ordinary work clothes. It wasn't khaki pants but they were khaki material, blue faded blue color, like a blue uniform made in khaki. Then he had on a brown shirt with a little silverlike stripe on it and he had on some kind of jacket, I didn't notice very close but I think it was a work jacket that almost matched the pants.
He, his shirt was open three buttons down here. He had on a T-shirt. You know, the shirt was open three buttons down there.

 The cab driver had Oswald wearing a jacket before he ever [supposedly] put one on.
"It all came back to him" after some apparent persuasion [from somebody]
 

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1595
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #637 on: May 30, 2018, 06:55:28 AM »
Then show us how smart you are: Who found that jacket?

It doesn't matter who first saw the jacket. It's of no importance.

Offline Howard Gee

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #638 on: May 30, 2018, 07:40:09 AM »
2nd Testimony of Oswald's 'cab driver' Wm Whaley..

 The cab driver had Oswald wearing a jacket before he ever [supposedly] put one on.
"It all came back to him" after some apparent persuasion [from somebody]
 

Whether Saint Oz was wearing a jacket or not when he was in the cab has no importance. Just like who found the jacket doesn't matter.

What does matter is if Saint Oz was wearing a jacket when he left his room.

If he was, then it's hard to understand why he no longer has a jacket when he's arrested.

The implication that the jacket that was found wasn't his, or was planted is pretty much destroyed by the fibers that matched his arrest shirt in the jacket and the fact that the conspirators would have had to known that Saint Oz wouldn't have had a jacket when he was arrested. The cops woud look pretty dumb arresting someone with a jacket when the suspect they were looking for discarded his after murdering JDT.

I know this is too much common sense for the Ozzie fanbois, but don't let common sense get in the way of your Oz worshipping.

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1595
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #639 on: May 30, 2018, 07:51:50 AM »
The cab driver had Oswald wearing a jacket before he ever [supposedly] put one on.

And Bardwell Odum had Oswald wearing a jacket in the Texas Theatre. So what?

 

Mobile View