Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Oswald's Light-Colored Jacket  (Read 30163 times)

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1461
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #20 on: January 18, 2018, 10:54:05 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Of course you have since your points require absolutely NO supporting evidence at all.

The jacket found was WHITE. Live with it.



It was a BRIGHT and SUNNY day and the following comparison is proof positive that the jacket appears much much lighter under BRIGHT and SUNNY conditions, so your evidence which relies on a personal interpretation of white under difficult lighting conditions is absolutely laughable!



And besides all that, the Jacket was initialed and is official evidence.





JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #20 on: January 18, 2018, 10:54:05 PM »


Offline Gary Craig

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 382
  • The human mind is our fundamental resource. JFK
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #21 on: January 18, 2018, 10:56:08 PM »
from
"VINNIE IT IS ROUND"
by Mark Lane


                     "The Commission claimed that Mrs. Markham identified Lee Harvey Oswald as the man who shot the policeman at a line up on November 22 and that in testimony before the Commission, Mrs. Markham confirmed herpositive identification of Lee Harvey Oswald as the man she saw kill Officer Tippit. Captain Fritz - who needed that identification real quickly -- testified that the lineup was hurriedly arranged at 4:30 that afternoon, less than three and a half hours after Tippit's death and less than that after Oswald's arrest. Mrs Markham was "quite hysterical"when she arrived at police headquarters. Her state and the atmosphere in the lineup room are best described by therecord of her testimony."

Q: Now when you went into the room you looked these people over, these four men?

Markham: Yes , sir.

Q: Did you recognize anyone in the lineup?

Markham: No, sir

Q: You did not? Did you see anybody-I have asked you that question before-did you recognize anybody from their face?

          "Counsel wished to remind Mrs. Markham that when he had prepared her for her testimony, before
a record of her answers was made, the matter had been discussed. To prepare a witness for testimony may
be acceptable where adversary and hostile cross-examination is expected, and it is also a legitimate way of
preventing repetition and irrelevant conjecture. The record of the Warren Commission, however, reveals no
such cross-examination and was burdened to such a degree by repetition and irrelevance that the initial
preparation seems to have been for the purpose of leading the witness to give an appropiate answer."


Markham: From their face, no.

Q: Did you identify anybody in these four people?

Markham: I didn't know nobody.

Q: I know you didn't know nobody, but did anybody in that lineup look like anybody you had seen before?

Markham: No. I had never seen none of them, none of these men.

Q: No one of the four?

Markham: No one of them.

Q: No one of the four?

Markham: No, sir.

        "At this point counsel, a teacher of criminal law and procedure at the University of Southern California anda member of the U.S. Judical Conference Advisory Committee on Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, asked arather leading question. Mrs. Markham said that she recognized no one at the lineup; counsel tried five times for amore acceptable answer. Then, departing a little from the legal procedure he teaches, he next asked his friendly but disconcerting witness, "Was there a number two man in there?" Mrs. Markham replied, "Number two is the one I picked." Counsel began another question:"I thought you just told me that you hadn't, but Mrs. Markham interrupted to answer inexplicably, "I thought you wanted me to describe their clothing."

Counsel then inquired:


Q: You recognized him from his appearance?

Markham: I asked-I looked at him. When I saw this man I wasn't sure, but I had cold chills just run all over me.

        "A mystical identification at best. However, the Commission was satisfied that its lawyer had at last
obtained the right answer: "Addressing itself solely to the probative value of Mrs. Markham's contemporaneous discription of the gunman and her identification of Oswald at a police lineup, the Commission considers her testimony reliable."
« Last Edit: January 18, 2018, 10:58:48 PM by Gary Craig »

Offline Gary Craig

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 382
  • The human mind is our fundamental resource. JFK
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #22 on: January 18, 2018, 11:00:37 PM »
Domingo Benavides description of Tippit's killer compared to a photo taken of Ozzie on 11/22/63 while in DPD custody.


Mr. Belin: Let me ask you now, I would like you to relate again the action of the man with the gun as you saw him now.

Mr. Benavides: As I saw him, I really--I mean really got a good view of the man after the bullets were fired he had just turned. He was just turning away........

~snip~

Mr. BENAVIDES - I remember the back of his head seemed like his hairline was sort of--looked like his hairline sort of went square instead of tapered off. and he looked like he needed a haircut for about 2 weeks, but his hair didn't taper off, it kind of went down and squared off and made his head look fiat in back.


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1461
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #23 on: January 18, 2018, 11:03:19 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
from
"VINNIE IT IS ROUND"
by Mark Lane


                     "The Commission claimed that Mrs. Markham identified Lee Harvey Oswald as the man who shot
the policeman at a line up on November 22 and that in testimony before the Commission, Mrs. Markham confirmed her
positive identification of Lee Harvey Oswald as the man she saw kill Officer Tippit. Captain Fritz - who needed that
identification real quickly -- testified that the lineup was hurriedly arranged at 4:30 that afternoon, less than three
and a half hours after Tippit's death and less than that after Oswald's arrest. Mrs Markham was "quite hysterical"
when she arrived at police headquarters. Her state and the atmosphere in the lineup room are best described by the
record of her testimony."


Q: Now when you went into the room you looked these people over, these four men?

Markham: Yes , sir.

Q: Did you recognize anyone in the lineup?

Markham: No, sir

Q: You did not? Did you see anybody-I have asked you that question before-did you recognize anybody from their face?

          "Counsel wished to remind Mrs. Markham that when he had prepared her for her testimony, before
a record of her answers was made, the matter had been discussed. To prepare a witness for testimony may
be acceptable where adversary and hostile cross-examination is expected, and it is also a legitimate way of
preventing repetition and irrelevant conjecture. The record of the Warren Commission, however, reveals no
such cross-examination and was burdened to such a degree by repetition and irrelevance that the initial
preparation seems to have been for the purpose of leading the witness to give an appropiate answer."


Markham: From their face, no.

Q: Did you identify anybody in these four people?

Markham: I didn't know nobody.

Q: I know you didn't know nobody, but did anybody in that lineup look like anybody you had seen before?

Markham: No. I had never seen none of them, none of these men.

Q: No one of the four?

Markham: No one of them.

Q: No one of the four?

Markham: No, sir.

        "At this point counsel, a teacher of criminal law and procedure at the University of Southern California and
a member of the U.S. Judical Conference Advisory Committee on Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, asked a
rather leading question. Mrs. Markham said that she recognized no one at the lineup; counsel tried five times for a
more acceptable answer. Then, departing a little from the legal procedure he teaches, he next asked his friendly but
disconcerting witness, "Was there a number two man in there?" Mrs. Markham replied, "Number two is the one I
picked." Counsel began another question:"I thought you just told me that you hadn't, but Mrs. Markham interrupted
to answer inexplicably, "I thought you wanted me to describe their clothing."

Counsel then inquired:


Q: You recognized him from his appearance?

Markham: I asked-I looked at him. When I saw this man I wasn't sure, but I had cold chills just run all over me.

        "A mystical identification at best. However, the Commission was satisfied that its lawyer had at last
obtained the right answer: "Addressing itself solely to the probative value of Mrs. Markham's contemporaneous
discription of the gunman and her identification of Oswald at a police lineup, the Commission considers her
testimony reliable."




So she didn't understand 1  clearly ambiguous question, WOW, is that all you got?

And as for the identification it wasn't the exact same Oswald, this future Oswald was bruised, cut and had a huge welt over his left eye, so a little trepidation is not only accepted but is welcome with open arms because her slight hesitation can only further reinforce her positive identification.

Try again!



JohnM




Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1461
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #24 on: January 18, 2018, 11:11:29 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Domingo Benavides description of Tippit's killer compared to a photo taken of Ozzie on 11/22/63 while in DPD custody.


Mr. Belin: Let me ask you now, I would like you to relate again the action of the man with the gun as you saw him now.

Mr. Benavides: As I saw him, I really--I mean really got a good view of the man after the bullets were fired he had just turned. He was just turning away........

~snip~

Mr. BENAVIDES - I remember the back of his head seemed like his hairline was sort of--looked like his hairline sort of went square instead of tapered off. and he looked like he needed a haircut for about 2 weeks, but his hair didn't taper off, it kind of went down and squared off and made his head look fiat in back.






Oswald's wind breaker type jacket was designed so the collar could be used as to protect your neck and as can be seen it's natural state was up.



So obviously Oswald's Jacket itself was creating a squared off edge. Just like in the following photo.





JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #24 on: January 18, 2018, 11:11:29 PM »


Offline Gary Craig

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 382
  • The human mind is our fundamental resource. JFK
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #25 on: January 18, 2018, 11:21:45 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login


So she didn't understand 1  clearly ambiguous question, WOW, is that all you got?

And as for the identification it wasn't the exact same Oswald, this future Oswald was bruised, cut and had a huge welt over his left eye, so a little trepidation is not only accepted but is welcome with open arms because her slight hesitation can only further reinforce her positive identification.

Try again!



JohnM

"So she didn't understand 1  clearly ambiguous question"

 ::)

You might want to look up "ambiguous" in a non LNer Dictionary.


Q: Did you recognize anyone in the lineup?

Markham: No, sir

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1461
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #26 on: January 18, 2018, 11:27:00 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
"So she didn't understand 1  clearly ambiguous question"

 ::)

You might want to look up "ambiguous" in a non LNer Dictionary.


Q: Did you recognize anyone in the lineup?

Markham: No, sir



Exactly, you do realize that Iacoletti argued for weeks, at which point someone was known and unknown and by whom, and you expect Markham to act how you want and if not you throw her under a bus for what is perfectly explainable, you Oswald fanatics are beyond reason.



JohnM

Offline Gary Craig

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 382
  • The human mind is our fundamental resource. JFK
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #27 on: January 18, 2018, 11:31:47 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Exactly, you do realize that Iacoletti argued for weeks, at which point someone was known and unknown and by whom, and you expect Markham to act how you want and if not you throw her under a bus for what is perfectly explainable, you Oswald fanatics are beyond reason.

JohnM

Could you translate your response into adult english.

I don't understand gibberish.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #27 on: January 18, 2018, 11:31:47 PM »


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1461
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #28 on: January 18, 2018, 11:37:13 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Could you translate your response into adult english.

I don't understand gibberish.





Up until now you've shown a clear lack of comprehending anything that convicts Oswald, so further clarifying a fact that you have no desire in accepting would be futile.



JohnM

Offline Gary Craig

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 382
  • The human mind is our fundamental resource. JFK
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #29 on: January 18, 2018, 11:52:34 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Up until now you've shown a clear lack of comprehending anything that convicts Oswald, so further clarifying a fact that you have no desire in accepting would be futile.

JohnM

Here's where you knuckle heads don't get it.

Oswald wasn't convicted of anything. He never went to trial. He never even got to talk to a lawyer before

being lynched.

The WCR is the uncontested prosecution case against him.

Comprehending it isn't a problem.

It's veracity is though.



JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #29 on: January 18, 2018, 11:52:34 PM »