Will we ever know what really happened?

[Howard Gee]

The debate will go on forever because people like you deny what the evidence actually shows.

What year did Benavides die ?

[Steve Howsley]

None that give insight as LHO was normal.

When did you last speak with him?

[Nicholas Turner]

None that give insight as LHO was normal.

So none that match with what you think is true. How do you know LHO was normal ( as you put it)?

[Dillon Rankine]

Sadly for you the majority of people read the evidence the way I do.

Appeal to the majority. Who cares if the majority read it as you do; that doesn?t make them right. Number isn?t a substitute for knowledge, expertise or qualification. ?The majority of people? believe some of the most laughable things, while less believe the facts of reality (more people believe in angels than in evolution).

Sadly for you the majority of actually educated people don?t read the evidence as you do?and nor could they. They?re either LNers or rational CTs.

I knew that you were a LNer. I was right again.

 

Define ?LNer? and how I meet the criterion.

[Dillon Rankine]

None that give insight as LHO was normal.

Despite all the studies showing that?s unlikely  .

Specially all those behavioural neurology papers I cited and you ignored. 

[John Iacoletti]

-an unrealistic expectancy of perfection in the evidence (in your world, people never make mistakes)

I think in your world, anything that doesn't comport with the official narrative is by definition a mistake.

[Dillon Rankine]

I think in your world, anything that doesn't comport with the official narrative is by definition a mistake.

No, I?m just not prepared to make mountains out of molehills because somebody got a date wrong, or had the audacity to not have a photographic memory.