Essay: The Mystery of Marina Oswald

[John Iacoletti]

Yawn, for the gazillionth time the "wedding ring" yet again.

Oswald's wedding ring is only one half of one of Bugliosi's 53 pieces of evidence so the "wedding ring" is not even 1% of Bugliosi's evidence.

JohnM

But Bugliosi claimed that each of his 53 pieces individually pointed to Oswald's guilt.  Why is that even on the list?  Just to make a longer list?  If that was the only one that wasn't actually evidence of anything then you might have a point.

- Leaving his wedding ring behind at the Paine house is evidence that points toward Oswald's guilt.
- Not reading the newspaper in the domino room that morning is evidence that points toward Oswald's guilt.
- Going to the second floor to get a Coke when he preferred Dr. Pepper is evidence that points toward Oswald's guilt.
- Not being chatty with the cab driver is evidence that points toward Oswald's guilt.
- Showing reporters his handcuffed hands is evidence that points toward Oswald's guilt.
- Marina thinking his eyes looked guilty is evidence that points toward Oswald's guilt.
- Leaving his blue jacket in the domino room is evidence that points toward Oswald's guilt.
- Leaving a clipboard on the sixth floor is evidence that points toward Oswald's guilt.

[Bill Chapman]

Nope, your hero Bugliosi said that.  We've been over this before...

You're the only poster constantly claiming that LNers say each of Bug53 would convict.

You are gaslighting

[John Iacoletti]

You're the only poster constantly claiming that LNers say each of Bug53 would convict.

I never even once claimed that "LNers say each of Bug53 would convict", much less "constantly".

Gaslighter.

[Bill Chapman]

I never even once claimed that "LNers say each of Bug53 would convict", much less "constantly".

Gaslighter.

LOL

You always squeal 'how does that prove murder' every time mention of any bug53 pops up.

Trolling gaslighter.

[Patrick Jackson]

The most important thing about Marina is language and I think that we must not take for granted her statements that were translated from Russian to English.
We know that she knew English quite OK but we will never know what exactly she stated in Russian during interrogations and testimonies.
I believe that her statements and testimonies (when given in Russian) were not translated correctly and even she knew English, she was too scared and stressed to pay attention if the translators were translating her words correctly.
Later, over the years, she most probably realized this but it was too late to change anything, Oswald was dead and she was receiving government help so she accepted WC conclusions.
DPD, FBI, CIA, WC done everything to frame Oswald so it is very easy to believe that translations were false.

[John Iacoletti]

LOL

You always squeal 'how does that prove murder' every time mention of any bug53 pops up.

Trolling gaslighter.

Is this your way of admitting that you attributed words to me that I never said?  Quote me ever "constantly claiming that LNers say each of Bug53 would convict", or STFU.

[Bill Chapman]

Is this your way of admitting that you attributed words to me that I never said?  Quote me ever "constantly claiming that LNers say each of Bug53 would convict", or STFU.

What exactly do I need to 'admit'? You are the one who automatically, like a broken record, accuses LNers of declaring Oswald guilty based solely on even one single action taken by Oswald.

Do you accuse us of claiming that we point to separate claims (in and of themselves) by Bug as proof of Oswald's guilt, or don't you?