Whose Target was General Edwin Walker?

[Rob Caprio]

Here is CE2113:



In it, The entrance/exit ramps on Stemmons are as wide as the through carriageways, and the Stemmons carriageways are significantly narrower than Elm, Main and Commerce. BTW, the Stemmons carriageways were originally built to be 5 lanes wide, see the following:



For that matter Austin and Market are significantly narrower than Houston and Lamar, not that CE2113 knows that.

CE2113 is just not a to-scale representation of the West End. It's simply foolish to rely on it as if it were.

You just keep changing the focus. Anything to avoid discussing the unnecessary two turns.

[Rob Caprio]

What does that  have to do with Walker?

They couldn't deal with the EAW subject so they changed the topic, but of course they can't deal with that topic either. No surprise really since they have no supporting evidence on their side.

[Mitch Todd]

You just keep changing the focus. Anything to avoid discussing the unnecessary two turns.

You're the guy who used CE2113 to argue that Elm was as wide as Main, therefore there was no reason to use Main rather than Elm. I just pointed out that your key piece of evidence isn't what you think it is or present it to be, and therefore your argument falls on its face. Your only response is to pretend I changed the subject, then repeat your now-baseless assertion in hopes no one notices you're standing buck-naked in the middle of the royal procession.

[Mitch Todd]

Actually, I was thinking of the letter he wrote where he goes into more detail. However, just based on the telegram, how did Walker know the "bullet before your committee" wasn't the one he remembered seeing in 1963?

So, John, afraid to answer my question?

[Jerry Freeman]

  how did Walker know the "bullet before your committee" wasn't the one he remembered seeing in 1963? So, John, afraid to answer my question?

Could it be a stupid question?..The general saw a picture of the bullet the Commission vermin produced as the one police found at his house and he knew it wasn't because he had like eyes and a memory

 
 

[Mitch Todd]

Could it be a stupid question?..The general saw a picture of the bullet the Commission vermin produced as the one police found at his house and he knew it wasn't because he had like eyes and a memory

Commission or Committee? We're talking about the HSCA. When would he have seen such a photo? For that matter, where does he say it was a photo?

[Jerry Freeman]

Commission or Committee? We're talking about the HSCA. When would he have seen such a photo? For that matter, where does he say it was a photo?

Entered as CE 573 I don't know what you are talking about...do you?
From the DVP pages...
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/18625-ce-573-walker-bullet-not-the-real-bullet/
From the Warren Report..
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/pdf/WH17_CE_573.pdf

[Mitch Todd]

Entered as CE 573 I don't know what you are talking about...do you?
From the DVP pages...
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/18625-ce-573-walker-bullet-not-the-real-bullet/
From the Warren Report..
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/pdf/WH17_CE_573.pdf

I'm talking about the bullet Walker wrote to the Attorney General about in 1979:

"The bullet used and pictured on the TV by US Senate G.Robert Blakey Committee on Assassinations is a ridiculous substitute for a bullet completely mutilated by such obstruction, baring no resemblance to any unfired bullet in shape or form"

As far as I know, the HSCA never showed CE573 or a photo of it during the HSCA Hearings. Its not listed in the HSCA exhibits, either. So what was Walker talking about? BTW, notice the phrase "US Senate G.Robert Blakey Committee on Assassinations" (that's really how it appears in the letter), and think about what that would mean as to the functionality of Walker's mind at the time.  Also, notice the reference to "any unfired bullet in shape or form." Why would he bring that up, unless he saw CE399 and thought it was supposed to be CE573?

[Rob Caprio]

You're the guy who used CE2113 to argue that Elm was as wide as Main, therefore there was no reason to use Main rather than Elm. I just pointed out that your key piece of evidence isn't what you think it is or present it to be, and therefore your argument falls on its face. Your only response is to pretend I changed the subject, then repeat your now-baseless assertion in hopes no one notices you're standing buck-naked in the middle of the royal procession.

You haven't "proven" anything.  The map and events speak for themselves. Elm Street should have been used.

It is quite laughable that you think that you have proven otherwise.

[Rob Caprio]

Commission or Committee? We're talking about the HSCA. When would he have seen such a photo? For that matter, where does he say it was a photo?

I believe he said that he saw it on television.