Why would the conspirators let Oswald have a midnight press conference?

[John Iacoletti]

Great civil discourse as usual.  Those of us who disagree with you are "idiots," "insane," and "going off the rails."  This one is pretty simple.  It would seemingly take someone of influence at the DPD to ensure the evidence was controlled and manipulated as many of your kindred have suggested over and over and over again.  In fact, many of the top DPD officials are routinely named as being involved in the plot for that very reason.  The inconsistency of your argument is that these same officials - who had the authority to control more complex tasks - couldn't call off the press conference.  They could frame Oswald, cover up the crime. and somehow recruit Ruby to kill Oswald, but they couldn't figure out how to keep Oswald from the press.  LOL.

Why do you think your fantasy conspirators would want to keep Oswald from the press?  Gee, he might say he didn't kill anybody.  That would ruin everything.

[John Iacoletti]

Congratulations, thanks for proving my point that even though you claim that the Dallas Police setup Oswald by replacing the Mauser, forged Oswald's palmprint, planted bullets, planted shells, planted a jacket, planted a revolver and host of other nefarious nastiness

When did Rob (or anyone else) claim that?

[John Iacoletti]

Hardly, the DP letting Oswald speak to the press can only lead to the Dallas Police having nothing to hide.

That's quite a glaring non-sequitur.  Even for you.

[Steve Howsley]

Why do you think your fantasy conspirators would want to keep Oswald from the press?  Gee, he might say he didn't kill anybody.  That would ruin everything.

That would ruin everything?

LOL

[John Mytton]

When did Rob (or anyone else) claim that?

Ok so you reckon that nobody claimed any of the main evidence was planted against Oswald, ok!

JohnM

[Howard Gee]

Why do you think your fantasy conspirators would want to keep Oswald from the press?  Gee, he might say he didn't kill anybody.  That would ruin everything.

Wait a minute.

I thought it was the CKs and the Saint patsy defense team that insist on the existence of conspirators.

Nice of you to acknowledge it's only a fantasy.

Try to get right whose fantasy it is.

[Jon Banks]

They are not my conspirators?.but your pathetic assumption that conspirators in general would ever be able to control every minor detail of an event and all the people involved is wacky to say the least.

Conspirators after the fact controlling the physical evidence, now that's a different ballgame all together.

But back to my question; what makes you think the people who arranged the press conferences were part of the conspiracy if there was one?

Conspirators never make mistakes.

That?s why no Conspiracy in the history of mankind has ever been exposed 

[Martin Weidmann]

Wait a minute.

I thought it was the CKs and the Saint patsy defense team that insist on the existence of conspirators.

Nice of you to acknowledge it's only a fantasy.

Try to get right whose fantasy it is.

How does the CT general belief of the existence of conspirators equate to LNs making up bogus stories about particular persons who they claim were, could or would have been, part of a conspiracy?