Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Z-317 shows no rearward blowout  (Read 10126 times)

Offline Jerry Organ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2286
Re: Z-317 shows no rearward blowout
« Reply #24 on: August 27, 2018, 05:02:47 PM »
Advertisement
The world's greatest photographer (IHOO) says that Oswald was leaning at a greater angle the  Farid said, so by default he is disagreeing with Farid. Whether ia m correct or not is immaterial. A lone nutter has agreed  that the so called expert, Farid, was wrong, which is  what I have said all along.

Rather than check out what I said in my previous post about perspective possibly being a factor, you would rather promote a false narrative that Lamson and Craig are in disagreement.

And bask in the self-illusion that you're smarter than them all.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Z-317 shows no rearward blowout
« Reply #24 on: August 27, 2018, 05:02:47 PM »


Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994
Re: Z-317 shows no rearward blowout
« Reply #25 on: August 27, 2018, 05:20:02 PM »
Rather than check out what I said in my previous post about perspective possibly being a factor, you would rather promote a false narrative that Lamson and Craig are in disagreement.

Farid says that Oswald was leaning at an angle of 5˚. Lamson says 7˚. Only to a lone nutter would this mean that they don't disagree about the angle of lean.


Quote

And bask in the self-illusion that you're smarter than them all.

Not at all. Just pointing out that Farid was not infallible. Maybe you believe you are.

Offline Jerry Organ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2286
Re: Z-317 shows no rearward blowout
« Reply #26 on: August 27, 2018, 05:40:47 PM »
Farid says that Oswald was leaning at an angle of 5˚. Lamson says 7˚. Only to a lone nutter would this mean that they don't disagree about the angle of lean.


In other words, nothing I said about perspective being a factor sunk in? Of course not.

And they call LNers "incurious."



JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Z-317 shows no rearward blowout
« Reply #26 on: August 27, 2018, 05:40:47 PM »


Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: Z-317 shows no rearward blowout
« Reply #27 on: August 28, 2018, 12:37:53 AM »
Rather than check out what I said in my previous post about perspective possibly being a factor, you would rather promote a false narrative that Lamson and Craig are in disagreement.

Lamson and Craig are the same person.

Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994
Re: Z-317 shows no rearward blowout
« Reply #28 on: August 28, 2018, 11:49:15 AM »
Lamson and Craig are the same person.

Lamson and Craig regularly disagree with each other. They are both very disagreeable. :D

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Z-317 shows no rearward blowout
« Reply #28 on: August 28, 2018, 11:49:15 AM »


Offline Jerry Organ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2286
Re: Z-317 shows no rearward blowout
« Reply #29 on: August 28, 2018, 06:57:06 PM »
Lamson and Craig regularly disagree with each other. They are both very disagreeable. :D

Hey, Ray. How's that Mitcham fellow -- who talked something about 10˚ -- doing these days? ::)


Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994
Re: Z-317 shows no rearward blowout
« Reply #30 on: August 29, 2018, 11:41:55 AM »
Hey, Ray. How's that Mitcham fellow -- who talked something about 10˚ -- doing these days? ::)

He's fine Jerry. How's that guy, Organ, who believes in the daft single bullet theory doing?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Z-317 shows no rearward blowout
« Reply #30 on: August 29, 2018, 11:41:55 AM »


Offline Jerry Organ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2286
Re: Z-317 shows no rearward blowout
« Reply #31 on: August 29, 2018, 12:57:22 PM »
He's fine Jerry. How's that guy, Organ, who believes in the daft single bullet theory doing?

Still tooting the "physically implausible" horn. And the experts got it wrong.