Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: What?s the best evidence of a second shooter?  (Read 18906 times)

Offline Dillon Rankine

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 113
What?s the best evidence of a second shooter?
« on: August 10, 2018, 02:35:27 PM »
Advertisement
CTs: what do you consider to be the best evidence of another shooter in Dealey Plaza, and why do you feel it is proof of this?

JFK Assassination Forum

What?s the best evidence of a second shooter?
« on: August 10, 2018, 02:35:27 PM »


Offline Jake Maxwell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 383
Re: What?s the best evidence of a second shooter?
« Reply #1 on: August 10, 2018, 04:14:52 PM »
CTs: what do you consider to be the best evidence of another shooter in Dealey Plaza, and why do you feel it is proof of this?
This fellow looking through a scope from the Mary Moorman polaroid pic...

Offline Duncan MacRae

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 471
    • JFK Assassination Photographs
Re: What?s the best evidence of a second shooter?
« Reply #2 on: August 10, 2018, 04:22:36 PM »
This fellow looking through a scope from the Mary Moorman polaroid pic...

                          Amazing  It's Phil Lynott

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: What?s the best evidence of a second shooter?
« Reply #2 on: August 10, 2018, 04:22:36 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: What?s the best evidence of a second shooter?
« Reply #3 on: August 10, 2018, 04:47:08 PM »
CTs: what do you consider to be the best evidence of another shooter in Dealey Plaza, and why do you feel it is proof of this?

There was another shooter in Dealey Plaza?
Okay, sure

 ::)

Offline Dillon Rankine

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 113
Re: What?s the best evidence of a second shooter?
« Reply #4 on: August 10, 2018, 04:55:40 PM »
This fellow looking through a scope from the Mary Moorman polaroid pic...


I don?t see anything.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: What?s the best evidence of a second shooter?
« Reply #4 on: August 10, 2018, 04:55:40 PM »


Offline Jake Maxwell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 383
Re: What?s the best evidence of a second shooter?
« Reply #5 on: August 10, 2018, 08:34:20 PM »
                          Amazing  It's Phil Lynott
No... but maybe James Files?
« Last Edit: August 10, 2018, 09:32:05 PM by Jake Maxwell »

Offline Gary Craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 907
Re: What?s the best evidence of a second shooter?
« Reply #6 on: August 11, 2018, 12:39:32 AM »
 JFK is thrown forward in less than a 1/2 second from a shot to the back. An impossibility if the Carcano is

the only weapon used in the assassination





--------------------

The HSCA gave considerable weight to the conclusion another gunman fired from the grassy knoll.

House Select Committee on Assassinations Final Report
Current Section: (d) Witness testimony on the shots


"An analysis by the committee of the statements of witnesses in Dealy Plaza on November 22, 1963, moreover, showed that about 44 percent were not able to form an opinion about the origin of the shots, attesting to the ambiguity showed in the August 1978 experiment. Seventy percent of the witnesses in 1963 who had an opinion as to the origin said it was either the book depository or the grassy knoll. Those witnesses who thought the shots originated from the grassy knoll represented 30 percent of those who chose between the knoll and book depository and 21 percent of those who made a decision as to origin. Since most of the shots fired on November 22, 1963 (three out of four, the committee determined) came from the book depository, the fact that so many witnesses thought they heard shots from
the knoll lent additional weight to a conclusion that a shot came from there."


http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/viewer/showDoc.do?docId=800&relPageId=120

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: What?s the best evidence of a second shooter?
« Reply #6 on: August 11, 2018, 12:39:32 AM »


Offline Bill Charleston

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 13
Re: What?s the best evidence of a second shooter?
« Reply #7 on: August 11, 2018, 01:00:52 AM »
CTs: what do you consider to be the best evidence of another shooter in Dealey Plaza, and why do you feel it is proof of this?

DOZENS of witnesses said the last sounds they heard during the shooting were BANG-BANG.

FIRST SHOT then a pause then BAM-BAM.


DOZENS of credible witnesses say BANG-BANG for the last two shots is what they heard.

If the last TWO shots were BAM-BAM as so many witnesses say they were, then what can we see in the Zapruder film that supports BAM seconds of pause then BAM-BAM (and Patricia Ann Donaldson says one of the BAM-BAM shots hit JFK)

Not a valid vimeo URL
To add more fuel to the information that makes SOLVING the JFK assassination "mystery" possible, listen to Gov. Connally tell you during his Warren Comm testimony that the force of the blow to his back bent him over.  As can be seen in the Zapruder film, John Connally is NOT bent over at any time in the Zapruder film until a splt second AFTER JFK was shot in the head!

John Connally says he turned to look toward what he thought was a rifle shot (a slight delay after the sign)
When he was turning back, he was bent over by the force of the blow to his back.

Not a valid vimeo URL
The Connallys always talked about hearing the shot that hit JFK in the head AFTER John was shot in the back, but the Zapruder film shows that is NOT true.  In fact, the Zapruder film shows that neither Nellie nor John was looking at JFK was he was shot in the head so they did NOT know when he was shot.

SUMMARY:

1.  Dozens of witnesses say the last two sounds were BANG-BANG

2.  In the Zapruder film, we can see Gov Connally bent over very rapidly a split second AFTER JFK was shot in the head

3.  Gov. Connally said in many interviews that the blow to his back was enough force to bend him over.  Connally is not BENT over at any time in the Zapruder film until a split second after JFK is shot in the head.

4,  No blood can be seen on Connally's shirt or right sleeve even seconds after the US gov't says he was shot in the back.  WHY is there NO blood anywhere on the front of Connally's white shirt?  The answer is easy, Connally was NOT shot in the back until a split second AFTER JFK was shot in the head.

5  When you look at frame 267, as mentioned NO BLOOD can be seen on Connally's white shirt.  Look at any Zapruder frame before JFK is shot in the head and NO blood will be found on Connally's shirt.  HOW THAT POSSIBLE?  Nellie said John had a hole in his chest about the size of a baseball.  The main point for #5 is, HOW IN THE WORLD did John Connally turn around like he is seen in #267 and he (allegedly) has a serious chest exit wound?






6  It is so easy to fool Americans.  They will believe ALMOST anything the US gubermint tells them to believe.  If you want to PROVE to yourself what happened, and what I have presented so far does NOT prove the BANG-BANG premise, then you have to start thinking without the US gubermint and fools like Bugliosi telling you what to think!  IF this was easy, Americans would have known the truth decades ago!