Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Statements That Sink The WC's Conclusions -- #320  (Read 541 times)

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1243
Re: Statements That Sink The WC's Conclusions -- #320
« Reply #20 on: August 09, 2018, 08:05:00 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
It's in your sycophantic Bugliosi video as "powerful evidence".

Oops, now who's trolling?

JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Statements That Sink The WC's Conclusions -- #320
« Reply #20 on: August 09, 2018, 08:05:00 PM »


Online Dillon Rankine

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 61
Re: Statements That Sink The WC's Conclusions -- #320
« Reply #21 on: August 09, 2018, 08:28:41 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Fair enough.  Does the same apply to "facial recognition" from 6 floors down or "facial recognition" from a police mug shot months after the fact?

I think my response to Rob answer the question:

Quote from: Dillon Rankine
I don’t recall saying or believing LHO definitely did it alone. Taylor et al’s ‘memory of Oswald’ is evidence of nothing and anybody who builds their case for the WCR on eyewitness evidence is just as in error.


Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2495
Re: Statements That Sink The WC's Conclusions -- #320
« Reply #22 on: August 09, 2018, 10:38:03 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
anybody who builds their case for the WCR on eyewitness evidence is just as in error.



But then you realize that the entire WC case rests on carefully selected and curated eyewitness evidence, right?

Offline Rob Caprio

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1929
  • You only receive flak when you are over the target
Re: Statements That Sink The WC's Conclusions -- #320
« Reply #23 on: August 09, 2018, 10:46:41 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
My star witness? I don’t recall saying or believing LHO definitely did it alone. Taylor et al’s ‘memory of Oswald’ is evidence of nothing and anybody who builds their case for the WCR on eyewitness evidence is just as in error.

You're a LNer. There is no doubt about that. What particular part of this post troubles you?

Offline Rob Caprio

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1929
  • You only receive flak when you are over the target
Re: Statements That Sink The WC's Conclusions -- #320
« Reply #24 on: August 09, 2018, 10:48:04 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
It's your interpretation of the evidence that gets in the way of the truth.

Give me an example. This is the same lame thing Paul May claims.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Statements That Sink The WC's Conclusions -- #320
« Reply #24 on: August 09, 2018, 10:48:04 PM »


Offline Rob Caprio

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1929
  • You only receive flak when you are over the target
Re: Statements That Sink The WC's Conclusions -- #320
« Reply #25 on: August 09, 2018, 10:49:45 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
LN kooks hate any detailed examination of the evidence.  They want to cling to their "mountains of evidence" myth.

Of course since it doesn't support what the WC claimed. That makes it harder for them if people know the evidence.

Online Ross Lidell

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 79
  • JFK : Profile In Courage
Re: Statements That Sink The WC's Conclusions -- #320
« Reply #26 on: August 10, 2018, 02:37:04 AM »
📥 "Whether you agree with him or not, researchers such as Rob Caprio for example, took the sensible initiative and saved his own research, and he is now reposting them back on the Forum.
All other members are free to do the same.” –Duncan MacRae

I have to compliment you (too) on your diligence Rob.

I created some tremendously original "subjects"--on the original "jfkassassinationforum--which I will now have to rewrite from memory. The second versions may be better or worse... nooone will ever know. What were the subjects? I'm not saying. There are smarter people on this forum than me. I'm not giving anyone the chance to trump my insightful theories supporting ODIA.


Online Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 909
Re: Statements That Sink The WC's Conclusions -- #320
« Reply #27 on: August 10, 2018, 05:53:59 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Says the guy who interprets a wedding ring in a cup as premeditated murder.

Says the guy who interprets one tree as being the whole forest

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Statements That Sink The WC's Conclusions -- #320
« Reply #27 on: August 10, 2018, 05:53:59 AM »


Online Dillon Rankine

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 61
Re: Statements That Sink The WC's Conclusions -- #320
« Reply #28 on: August 10, 2018, 01:01:54 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login


But then you realize that the entire WC case rests on carefully selected and curated eyewitness evidence, right?

The WCR highlights everything wrong with allowing lawyers to dabble in forensic science. They had physical evidence, so it wasn’t entirely based on witnesses, though you could certainly talk about their overuse or even abuse of testimony to bolster their case.

I much preferred the HSCA’s way of doing things, with actual analyses of the evidence (where existing biases certainly appeared) by qualified persons. Witnesses are best used to tie together physical evidence, CTs frequently build their whole case off it.

Online Dillon Rankine

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 61
Re: Statements That Sink The WC's Conclusions -- #320
« Reply #29 on: August 10, 2018, 01:11:31 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You're a LNer. There is no doubt about that. What particular part of this post troubles you?

Can you provide one statement of mine where I say I believe LHO was the lone assassin?

(For eveyone else: now watch as he declares he doesn’t need to, while I still have to cite my conclusions from specfic texts he approves of.) 

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Statements That Sink The WC's Conclusions -- #320
« Reply #29 on: August 10, 2018, 01:11:31 PM »