What?s the MINIMUM number of people required for your CT to work?

[Bill Chapman]

Says the guy who's never presented any evidence whatsoever.

So I have to prove Bugliosi's claim is wrong?  Gee, where have we heard that before?

The burden of proof is yours since you are the one making the claim that the WC is wrong.

[Martin Weidmann]

The burden of proof is yours since you are the one making the claim that the WC is wrong.

Thanks for the laugh?.. I needed that. Better than comedy central

[Bill Chapman]

Says the guy who's never presented any evidence whatsoever.

So I have to prove Bugliosi's claim is wrong?  Gee, where have we heard that before?

Don't trust Bug? So read the conspiracy-monger books, like Bugliosi did, to get his count.

[John Iacoletti]

Thanks for the laugh?.. I needed that. Better than comedy central

Logic has never been Chapman's forte.

[Bill Chapman]

Logic has never been Chapman's forte.

Your twisted interpretation of the evidence and rabid insistence on trying the case piecemeal either disqualifies you outright, or shifts the burden

[John Iacoletti]

Your twisted interpretation of the evidence and rabid insistence on trying the case piecemeal either disqualifies you outright, or shifts the burden

Let's talk about shifting the burden:

"Name your shooter" -- Bill Chapman about a zillion times.

[Bill Chapman]

Let's talk about shifting the burden:

"Name your shooter" -- Bill Chapman about a zillion times.

No. lets see why you avoided the fact that cases are not tried piecemeal
They are tried on the accumulated evidence, no matter how much all y'all want to shuck & jive.
 
Anyway I took pity on you lot last time, letting you off the hook by asking only for a probable shooter
After all, the WC said probably, the HSCA said likely