Ooo, you seem to be getting a bit of a strop on now, Weidmann.
But you're the one issuing the challenge and with so much internet fraud in the world, surely it's up to you to provide proof that you have the means to fulfil the challenge you openly offered by providing us with sufficient proof of funds and a recognised legal representative before we take your challenge (that again you offered without provocation) seriously.
How are you going to check that we have sufficient funds? Ask us to provide you with our bank account number, sort code and mother's maiden name so you can check?
by providing us with sufficient proof of funds Who is "us"? You and "John Mytton"
surely it's up to you to provide proof that you have the means to fulfil the challenge No problem. Who do I provide the proof to?
a recognised legal representative before we take your challenge Again, who is "we". And you can accept the challenge under the proviso that with the proof of fund it is null and void. I am not going to provide any information before you accept the challenge in a legally binding manner.
How are you going to check that we have sufficient funds? Again, who is "we". A certificate from your bank will do.
Well, if I took you up on your challenge then you would have to, Weidmann. I thought that was the whole point of the challenge. No. When you claim Otto and I are the same person, it's you who need to prove that. I don't have to do anything, except take your money of course
We made the claim, yes, but you made the challenge and then threw in unreasonable rules as you went along.
There is nothing unreasonabe about the challenge, You either prove it or your don't.
I tell you what, let's forget about your challenge and allow me to offer a new challenge whereby I will give you and Otto both £50.000 if I can't provide sufficient evidence that you and Otto are the same person within the next 12 months. If I do you have to give me £50,000 each.
I don't know about Otto, but as far as I am concerned, I accept your challenge.
To get things rolling you both have to PM me the name of your solicitors along with proof that you can both pay me the £50,000 when I come up with the evidence. If you don't take me up on this challenge then it's abundantly clear that you are the same person and that you're both spombleprofglidnoctobunsting bricks at being properly exposed to everyone.
I can't speak for Otto, but give me the contact details of your solicitor, and I'll have my lawyers contact him/them within the next few days. Btw, I will still need proof from your bank that you have the funds to pay Otto and me.
