Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Lame LN excuses  (Read 45836 times)

Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2693
Re: Lame LN excuses
« Reply #48 on: January 05, 2020, 04:07:40 AM »
Advertisement
Too bad there isn't a straight-line path entering JFK's back at the T1 vertebrae and exiting the throat at C7. If there is then there isn't a LNer with guts to show us the trajectory using my 2 laser challenge. LNers is cheap, lazy bastages who are not interested in the truth. Prove me wrong, I DARE YOU!  ;D



Trojan,

What's a bastage?

--  MWT  ;)

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Lame LN excuses
« Reply #48 on: January 05, 2020, 04:07:40 AM »


Online Mitch Todd

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 907
Re: Lame LN excuses
« Reply #49 on: January 05, 2020, 04:58:35 AM »
Too bad there isn't a straight-line path entering JFK's back at the T1 vertebrae and exiting the throat at C7. If there is then there isn't a LNer with guts to show us the trajectory using my 2 laser challenge. LNers is cheap, lazy bastages who are not interested in the truth. Prove me wrong, I DARE YOU!  ;D



It's quite well known that bullets often do not travel in a straight line once they've hit something, and measurements have some amount of uncertainty built in, so I'm not sure what you're trying to prove with your straight line shtick. Other than the rest of us shouldn't take you seriously.

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7395
Re: Lame LN excuses
« Reply #50 on: January 05, 2020, 06:27:11 AM »
It's quite well known that bullets often do not travel in a straight line once they've hit something, and measurements have some amount of uncertainty built in, so I'm not sure what you're trying to prove with your straight line shtick. Other than the rest of us shouldn't take you seriously.

bullets often do not travel in a straight line once they've hit something

What does that mean.... "hit something"?

Are you saying that a bullet going through a body without hitting anything other than soft tissue will not travel in a straight line?


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Lame LN excuses
« Reply #50 on: January 05, 2020, 06:27:11 AM »


Offline Jerry Organ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2277
Re: Lame LN excuses
« Reply #51 on: January 05, 2020, 05:42:11 PM »


This is a 3D model from Render People. They claim their models are photorealistic by virtue of a 250-camera scan system. I added a high-poly skeleton scaled to the figure's height.

I had to articulate the skeleton's neck bones above T1 to match the figure's neck posture and orient the skull. All bones are connected to articulation points fixed on the original skeleton model. The SBT missile track entered at the model's C7 level and exited T1 level. It passed the spine without striking it or the first rib, but encountered the T1 vertebra's external process. So on a model that isn't replicating Kennedy's neck posture, the neck transit did come close in some regards to the proposed SBT transit.

BTW, it is possible for the SBT missile track to pass by the skeleton model at C7/T1 without striking any bone; I have seen this on the skeleton model alone.

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1744
Re: Lame LN excuses
« Reply #52 on: January 05, 2020, 06:47:30 PM »
Lame John I. excuses:

1) Everyone lied or planted evidence if it implicates Oswald (repeat in every instance but then deny this is what you are doing).
2) Suggest that every explanation that addresses an insane CTer claim is a "strawman" argument (demonstrating either a traumatic childhood experience with The Wizard of Oz or a way to avoid acknowledging the lunacy of these claims without having to address the substance)
3)  Suggest all evidence is the product of an "opinion, "assumption," or "speculation." Fingerprints, hand writing, document, pictures - any inference drawn from this evidence is merely an opinion.  This limitation does not, however, apparently apply to any nutty counter-alternative to Oswald's guilt no matter how improbable or baseless.  If it is possible, then it can be entertained or implied so long as it lends itself to doubt about Oswald's guilt.

 Thumb1: Thumb1:

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Lame LN excuses
« Reply #52 on: January 05, 2020, 06:47:30 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: Lame LN excuses
« Reply #53 on: January 05, 2020, 08:48:28 PM »
It's quite well known that bullets often do not travel in a straight line once they've hit something,

Then how do you know where the bullet(s) that wounded Connally originated from?

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: Lame LN excuses
« Reply #54 on: January 05, 2020, 08:50:18 PM »
Thumb1: Thumb1:

Way to chime in on a 2-year-old post, Brown!

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Lame LN excuses
« Reply #54 on: January 05, 2020, 08:50:18 PM »


Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7395
Re: Lame LN excuses
« Reply #55 on: January 05, 2020, 10:13:38 PM »
Way to chime in on a 2-year-old post, Brown!

Give him a break. He's a bit slow.