Is the mystery of throat and back wounds a draw?

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Is the mystery of throat and back wounds a draw?  (Read 15563 times)

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Is the mystery of throat and back wounds a draw?
« Reply #14 on: March 10, 2022, 06:15:00 PM »
That the top of JFK's head is blown off is evidenced in a number of ways.
Why do you change the subject?
Dr. Marion Thomas Jenkins...Parkland Doctor.
Arlen Specter-- prepped with a bunch of technical mumbo jumbo, consistently tells the Parkland doctors and nurses how the throat wound happened and then tries to get them to confirm it.
Quote
Mr. SPECTER - Dr. Jenkins, would your observation of the wound and your characterization of it as an exit hole be consistent with a set of facts which I will ask you to assume for purposes of giving me your view or opinion.
Assume, first of all, if you will, that President Kennedy had a wound on the upper right posterior thorax just above the upper border of the scapula, measuring 14 cm. from the tip of the right acromion process and 14 cm. below the tip of the right mastoid process, and that the missile was a 6.5 mm. jacketed bullet fired from a weapon having a muzzle velocity of approximately 2,000 feet per second and approximately 160 to 250 feet from the President, and that after entering the President's body at the point indicated, the missile traveled between two strap muscles and through a fascia plane without violating the pleura cavity, and then struck the right side of the trachea and exited through the throat, would the throat wound which you observed be consistent with such a wound inflicted in the manner I have just described?
Dr. JENKINS - As far as I know, it wouldn't be inconsistent with it, Mr. Specter.

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5118
Re: Is the mystery of throat and back wounds a draw?
« Reply #15 on: March 10, 2022, 10:16:22 PM »
Strange how some people believe possibly altered frames of a film are gospel.

Well Ray, the CGI tools we have now half a century later are infinitely better at recreating photorealistic images so how about you or your expert mate David Healey re-alter some film frames and then reinsert those frames back into the original and then we can judge if it's actually possible.

JohnM

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Is the mystery of throat and back wounds a draw?
« Reply #16 on: March 11, 2022, 11:22:32 PM »
Quote
Several retired Dallas policemen have files and evidence relating to this case. So far there have been two books from Dallas policemen, Jesse Curry's assassination file, recently there is a book by Gary Savage, I believe, a nephew of Rusty Livingston who worked in the crime lab. This book is called, First Day Evidence. Rusty Livingston would have a lot of evidence and files relating to the case that would be worth looking at.

Specifically in that book, he worked in the crime lab, he mentions a camera which was used to take photographs of photographs, and he mentions that they were of such good quality that the photographs of the photographs could pass for originals. I find that very interesting, and I would ask the review panel if somehow they could acquire that camera. I would like people with more scientific and photographic technical expertise than I have to examine that camera. I would like to look at documents of the Dallas police crime lab, how many photographs of photographs they took, who saw them, where they went, were any used as an original photograph, did that get into the official record, and such.

I would also like to know if the review panel has been in contact with organizations that have photographic evidence like local television stations here in Dallas, the Sixth Floor Museum has a lot of photographs, Southern Methodist University, Dallas Times Herald although no longer in existence as a newspaper must have their archives somewhere, the Dallas Morning News, Fort Worth Star Telegram, and things like that. How would you guys go about getting material from that, or would you need more specific information from someone like me asking them a question?
https://www.jfk-assassination.net/arrb/index78.htm

Revealing that some of the photographic evidence just may have been faked redone altered.
However.... there was nothing further about it.