I already did - a forensic analysis of the Z-film
1] Oswald wasn't tracking anything as he wasn't in the SN at the time of the shooting
2] The shooter was fully aware of the tree, it didn't 'suddenly come into view' 
3] The shooter had visualised the open space just beyond the tree as the 'kill zone'. The limo would be at it's straightest from his POV, with minimal lateral movement.
4] Read through "The First Shot" thread to familiarise yourself with this issue rather than just swallow the WC Report down hook, line and sinker.
5] If the sound of the shots was so distant it would not have created any Jiggle for anyone to Analyse. That's the importance of Sitzman's observation. Jiggle Analysis is meaningless for the Z-film.
I don't even know what to make with #1. Is it your theory that Oswald brought his rifle into the TSBD in the rifle bag with his palm and fingerprint on the bottom of the bag, assembled it for someone else to use, placing his palm print on the underside of the barrel in the process, then handed it over for someone else to use to shoot JFK and before he left, he pressed the butt of the rifle against his shirt to deposit fibers from it and also planted a few of his fingerprints on top of the boxes stacked by the window. If Oswald was a patsy, he had to be the most cooperative patsy ever because he did so many things that made him look guilty.
I will never understand why CTs feel compelled to reach for the most convoluted explanations imaginable to explain the evidence rather than just accept the simplest, most straight forward explanation that the reason for the evidence being what it was, is that Oswald smuggled the rifle into work to use it to kill JFK.
As for #2, if the shooter was going to try to get off a shot before JFK ducked under the tree, he would have started tracking his target as soon as the limo made the turn onto Elm. That would have created tunnel vision. He was probably hoping to get a clear shot at JFK before the tree came into play but when the branches appeared in his scope, it's not hard to imagine he would rush the shot, possibly contributing to the bad miss.
I agree with #3 but I also believe Oswald wanted to give himself an extra chance by taking the difficult early shot. Even if that shot only had a 10% chance of landing, that's a better shot than not taking the shot at all.
As for #4, I've been familiarizing myself with all the issues regarding the JFKA for 35 years. I really don't need some CT explaining them to me.
#5 makes no sense. The sound of a high powered rifle at 90 yards is going to be plenty loud. It resulted in a jiggle 7-8 frames after the second shot and another 7-8 frames after the third shot. I see no reason why it would not have caused a jiggle on the first shot.
