91
Worldly & Other Worldly Mysteries - UFOs/UAPs - Bigfoot - Ghosts etc / The Secret NASA Transmissions - The Raw Footage
« Last post by Duncan MacRae on June 29, 2026, 09:47:18 PM »The Secret NASA Transmissions - The Raw Footage
Your scenario is impossible.And a bullet looking anything like CE399 strikes a rib so hard it broke at the spine and felt like a sucker punch to the back, blasted out 10 cm of the rib farther along, then shattered the radius in five pieces before bending around the radius - not deflecting away from the point of contact and not going through it either - and entered the left thigh where it embeds a piece of lead in the femur - that is NOT impossible? What is your test for impossibility?
It's not the evidence that tells you JFK was struck by the first shot. That's the voices in your head telling you that.You are on to me now. I fabricated all of the "evidence" from voices in my head and then made devilishly clever moves to plant my fabrications into the public record:
Is it plausible Oswald could have completely missed the limo with his first shot?
LOL and Holy Cow! So the FPP's own head-wound diagrams don't count?!
And, umm, I already said that the FPP did not discuss the amount of missing frontal bone in their report. They "said" nothing specific about it, but in their diagrams they depicted the frontal bone as undamaged and they absurdly placed the triangular fragment in the parietal bone.
Have you STILL not looked at the FPP head-wound diagrams?
Oh my! I have danced around the issue?! You must have written this howler in juvenile-teenager-provocation mode.
You've done nothing but dance and duck and dodge to avoid admitting you severely blundered in claiming that the FPP "identified a piece missing from the posterior of the frontal bone," when their own diagrams prove they did no such thing.
People who read this silliness are going to conclude that you either have a serious reading comprehension problem or that you are incapable of being candid and credible.
You cannot be so illiterate as to not understand that I have plainly and repeatedly said that the FPP was demonstrably wrong (1) for denying that the x-rays show a substantial amount of missing frontal bone, (2) for ignoring McDonnel's and Angel's conclusions about the amount of missing frontal bone, and (3) for bogusly placing the triangular fragment in the parietal bone.

You don't know that. That's just what you want to believe. Since I know it would be a waste of time with you, I won't bother to cite all the evidence of illicit pre-autopsy surgery, of two extra bullets being found during the autopsy (one in the sheets wrapped around JFK's head and on in the limo), and of the receipt for a "missile" found during the autopsy (which missile later disappeared and was covered up with the explanation that the federal agents used the word "missile" to refer to fragments--sure, happens all the time).
For those who would like to read some of the evidence of extra bullets and missed shots, please see my article on the subject:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WRwhDQ9HMydf5pICsHwgtkoNKw0YSO8T/view?usp=sharing
BTW, why haven't any of the SBT wound ballistics tests, even some of the markedly rigged ones, been able to duplicate the SBT, i.e., produce a bullet that did the same amount of damage that CE 399 allegedly did and emerged in the same virtually pristine condition as CE 399? What's up with that?
Oh, sorry, I forgot that you reject the science of wound ballistics testing when it comes to the JFK case.
Yeah, never mind that Connally said he was certain he was not hit before Z229. Never mind that his visible reactions that start in Z238--the right shoulder drop, the puffing of cheeks, and the pained expression--were involuntary reactions that would not have taken more than four frames to occur after he was hit.
And are you ever going to explain how you can still believe in the SBT when we know there was no hole through the tie and no nick on the tie knot's left edge?
So unable to provide a quote to support your assertion you use the kitchen sink approach and dump a whole lot of documents and expect me to go through them to find the quote that you claim exists. Specifically, in which of those documents does the FPP doggedly deny there was missing frontal bone?
You have danced around the issue so much I don't even know which side you are taking.
Do you side with the FPP who you CLAIM denied there was missing frontal bone or with McDonnel and Angel who said there was?
Hey, Einstein. If the back wound had no exit and the throat wound had no exit, there should have been two bullets in the body. There were zero.
I feel confident in saying the shot struck +/- within one frame of Z222.
So are you saying a missed aimed shot followed rapidly by a shot without further aiming also has to miss? Why? Any scenario that happens is always improbable.
The evidence tells you whether it happened. The evidence says that JFK was struck by the first shot; that the last two shots were closer together and the head shot was the last shot.