The other agents in the followup car heard three shots despite operating under the same disadvantages vis-a-vis the motorcycle engines, so I'm not sure if that's the answer.

Dear danny BOY o'meara,

Why did the evil, evil bad guys create such a strangely deformed bullet?

How did the evil, evil bad guys create such a strangely deformed bullet?

And how many evil, evil bad guys were involved in the assassination and or it's "ongoing cover up ," anyway?

Oodles and gobs, or just a few?

--Tom

Ermmm... I'm the one who was talking about the two unrecorded bullet fragments supposedly recovered from the limo by an unknown agent at an unknown time that had nothing to do with a legitimate examination of the limo crime scene.

I'M THE ONE TELLING YOU ABOUT IT!!

You are the one going on about another bullet that was recovered.
Clearly you are talking sh!t, as usual. You have been called out on it and are now trying to make it look as though you weren't talking complete sh!t.
Are you so ignorant as to try to pretend there was another bullet 'recovered'??
Apparently so.
Or maybe you don't understand the difference between a bullet and multiple bullet fragments.

Just to try to cut through John's utter ignorance of this case...:
There is ZERO EVIDENCE CE399 was found at Parkland.
2 bullet fragments that have ZERO PROVENANCE were, apparently, handed over to the same FBI lab that faked the appearance of CE399.
Lots of dubious ballistic shenanigans appear to have gone on at the Washington labs, including the miracuolus appearance of CE399 and Q9.

Is it possible the FBI were faking ballistic evidence?
Is it possible that Hoover had already determined the outcome of the investigation before it had even begun?
Is it possible the WC Sham was an extension of the FBI's pre-determined 'investigation'?

A reasonable observation. It was a once in a lifetime opportunity for most people in Dealey Plaza to see Jack and Jackie up close. Who is going to look at them in their peripheral vision? But Andrew is so desperate to save his silly theory that he'll come up with anything.

Completely unnecessary. The WC provided all the evidence necessary to convince any person with common sense Oswald was the assassin.

PS. I don't give a shit about the wallets. It's just another example of a CT trying to make the case for conspiracy simply by raising a question or pointing to an anomaly. If you want to make the case for conspiracy, you have to provide actual evidence that someone other than Oswald took part in the crime. That means finding answers to the question raised and explaining how that answer proves conspiracy. Going around asking, "What about this? What about that?", doesn't cut it.