Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]
91
That's what the evidence indicated. You need imagination to conclude he got hit by second bullet. To believe your nonsense, we would have to believe that JBC got hit by the first shot and didn't even feel it. He had a clear memory of hearing that first shot and no memory of a wound to his thigh.
Are you saying that bullets are always felt?

Quote
Your theory doesn't fit any of the hard evidence. Every explanation you give for that is a stretch.JBC isn't even close to being turned as far right as your drawing depicts and even then your drawing has his thigh flared in an unnatural position to the left while you have his body over rotated to the right. This is what I mean by a stretch. It's downright goofy.
I have him turned about 2 o'clock from car-forward.  Here is what it would look like with people:


JBC was sitting on a seat mounted on the floor.  Try that and see where your knees naturally go.
92
   I know you guys and Cronkite enjoy echoing the Nova "test" stuff Ad nauseam. But, how about just telling this Forum what YOU see? Do you see: (1) A Pristine Bullet/CE 399? (2) JFK's head explode on contact?  People want to rely on the JFK Assassination "images" until they don't.

I don't know where you are going with this but CE399 is not pristine and JFK's head did explode.
93
Yes. It tells me that everyone assumed that JBC was hit by only one bullet.
That's what the evidence indicated. You need imagination to conclude he got hit by second bullet. To believe your nonsense, we would have to believe that JBC got hit by the first shot and didn't even feel it. He had a clear memory of hearing that first shot and no memory of a wound to his thigh.
Quote

Statistical corroboration of witnesses is used by the CIA, Mossad, MI5 and every other successful intelligence agency all the time.  They gather information from various sources and determine facts.  Although each piece is individually is not reliable, when the pieces all fit together they are extremely reliable.   That is all I am doing.

Your theory doesn't fit any of the hard evidence. Every explanation you give for that is a stretch.
Quote

If the 9 pages of witness recollections I provided, which fit with the 20+ witness recollections that JFK reacted to the first shot in ways not seen until after z193, which fit together with the motorcade witnesses, Betzner, Phil Willis, Linda Willis, Altgens, Hickey, Greer, and the witnesses along Elm who stated where JFK was in relation to where they were standing at the time of the first shot, were independent, the only rational conclusion is that the last two shots were close together, JFK reacted to the first shot and the first shot was after z186.  In fact the way the three bodies fit together with the zfilm (there is a five second time difference between JFK showing signs of being hit so that must be the first shot according to the shot spacing witnesses. And that fits all the 20+ who said that JFK reacted that way to the first shot.  And that fits with where the witnesses in the motorcade, Elm St. witnesses, photographers etc put the first shot: i.e. after z186) tells you that the witnesses are independent.
? At z193, JBC's shoulders are turned right so that his chest is facing left the sightline from Zapruder, which is 30 degrees. For that to be 60 degrees too far right, you must think JBC is facing to the left of forward in z193.

JBC isn't even close to being turned as far right as your drawing depicts and even then your drawing has his thigh flared in an unnatural position to the left while you have his body over rotated to the right. This is what I mean by a stretch. It's downright goofy.

98
That alone should tell you somethingCE399 showed how that happened.
Yes. It tells me that everyone assumed that JBC was hit by only one bullet.
Quote
Your fixation on eyewitnesses while ignoring the hard evidence continues to prevent you from knowing the truth of the assassination.
Statistical corroboration of witnesses is used by the CIA, Mossad, MI5 and every other successful intelligence agency all the time.  They gather information from various sources and determine facts.  Although each piece is individually is not reliable, when the pieces all fit together they are extremely reliable.   That is all I am doing.

If the 9 pages of witness recollections I provided, which fit with the 20+ witness recollections that JFK reacted to the first shot in ways not seen until after z193, which fit together with the motorcade witnesses, Betzner, Phil Willis, Linda Willis, Altgens, Hickey, Greer, and the witnesses along Elm who stated where JFK was in relation to where they were standing at the time of the first shot, were independent, the only rational conclusion is that the last two shots were close together, JFK reacted to the first shot and the first shot was after z186.  In fact the way the three bodies fit together with the zfilm (there is a five second time difference between JFK showing signs of being hit so that must be the first shot according to the shot spacing witnesses. And that fits all the 20+ who said that JFK reacted that way to the first shot.  And that fits with where the witnesses in the motorcade, Elm St. witnesses, photographers etc put the first shot: i.e. after z186) tells you that the witnesses are independent.

Quote
There is nothing about your theory that is the least bit compatible with the Z-film. Robin Unger's enhanced Z193 frame shows just how ridiculous your drawing is of how JBC would have to be turned for your scenario to hold water.
I would estimate there is at least a 60 degree difference in the turn of JBC's shoulder between the Z-frame and your drawing. It is preposterous.
? At z193, JBC's shoulders are turned right so that his chest is facing left the sightline from Zapruder, which is 30 degrees. For that to be 60 degrees too far right, you must think JBC is facing to the left of forward in z193.
99
Weigman / Bell Composite i did about 5-years ago.

It showsg the real standing location of the weigman spectators.

100
I made this weigman composite image about 5-years ago.

it shows the bystander standing location, going from the TSBD across to the concrete island.

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]