Recent Posts91
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Zapruder film "fakery" and the ED Forum Kooks!
« Last post by Lance Payette on Yesterday at 02:53:23 AM »I realize common sense is no fun at all, but what is the logic here?
We have conspirators who are sophisticated enough to immediately leap into action and alter the Z film – so pretty sophisticated, yes?
How do these sophisticated folks have a conspiracy so clumsy that they need to alter the Z film? If the plan is to sell Oswald as a lone gunman in TSBD6, why do any shots come from anywhere other than a location and trajectory plausibly attributable to TSBD6?
How did they know the shot(s) from the front would even be amenable to alteration? What if the frontal gunman had hit JFK squarely in the nose – what then?
How did they know there wouldn’t be three, six or ten other people filming in Dealey Plaza? How did they know on the evening of 11-22 there weren’t? How did they know their alterations wouldn’t be immediately exposed by a different film that surfaced a week later?
Why wasn't the film immediately confiscated from Zapruder? Instead of an elaborate plot to alter the Z film, why not just say it was destroyed during processing or whatever? Sorry, it’s gone. Why go through this elaborate hoax?
Once again, it seems to me, CTers bog down in minutiae – all the supposed “evidence” of alteration – and simply ignore that …
Does it? If someone thinks it does, take me through how it worked. Take me plausibly through - just plausibly, that's all I ask - why there was a shot from the front, what the contingency plan was “just in case someone captures it on film,” and all the rest. I’ll bet you can’t!
We have conspirators who are sophisticated enough to immediately leap into action and alter the Z film – so pretty sophisticated, yes?
How do these sophisticated folks have a conspiracy so clumsy that they need to alter the Z film? If the plan is to sell Oswald as a lone gunman in TSBD6, why do any shots come from anywhere other than a location and trajectory plausibly attributable to TSBD6?
How did they know the shot(s) from the front would even be amenable to alteration? What if the frontal gunman had hit JFK squarely in the nose – what then?
How did they know there wouldn’t be three, six or ten other people filming in Dealey Plaza? How did they know on the evening of 11-22 there weren’t? How did they know their alterations wouldn’t be immediately exposed by a different film that surfaced a week later?
Why wasn't the film immediately confiscated from Zapruder? Instead of an elaborate plot to alter the Z film, why not just say it was destroyed during processing or whatever? Sorry, it’s gone. Why go through this elaborate hoax?
Once again, it seems to me, CTers bog down in minutiae – all the supposed “evidence” of alteration – and simply ignore that …
THIS MAKES NO SENSE AT ALL
Does it? If someone thinks it does, take me through how it worked. Take me plausibly through - just plausibly, that's all I ask - why there was a shot from the front, what the contingency plan was “just in case someone captures it on film,” and all the rest. I’ll bet you can’t!
A premature emphasis on the lone nut scenario excluding other areas of inquiry.