Those 25 witnesses evidently mistook the "backfire-like" sound of Oswald's first shot at "Z-124" as a backfire, a firecracker, or maybe even a blowout.

That, coupled with the fact that JFK's "startle reaction" was undoubtedly too subtle to be observable, the fact that his and Jackie's conscious head turning around Z-139 evoked their inquisitiveness, if anything, and the fact that the first shot missed everything, led them to mistakenly believe that Oswald's second shot around Z-222 was his first one -- for the simple reason that JFK's and JBC's reactions were quite noticeable only after they were both wounded by CE-399.

You're beyond hope, then.

Especially if you compare said tilt with the way he looked in frame Z-138.

https://assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z138.jpg

You can't tell that Bennet's flesh-colored face and his white shirt are leaning to his right in Z-150?

https://assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z150.jpg

There are at least 25 witnesses who reported seeing JFK's reacting to the first shot.

It’s telling that you left out Woodward’s reporting that the limo came “nearly to a halt” after the “backfire-like” missing-everything first shot.

As you and I both know, the limo didn’t slow down nearly to a halt until after JFK (and JBC) had been wounded (by CE-399) around Z-222.

The fact that she said that is an indication that she confused what occurred after Z-222 with what happened after Oswald’s “backfire-like” missing-everything shot at “Z-124.”

That, plus the fact that JFK didn’t start waving to Woodward and Co. until Z-175, is confirmation that my analysis is correct: Woodward jumbled the events surrounding the first and second shots.

But at least she was correct in saying there were three shots and that the first shot missed everything.