JFK Assassination Forum

  People do Not realize that the TSBD Landing where Prayer Man was standing has been changed. That landing was Not as deep back on 11/22/63. The narrowness of that landing makes it difficult to believe that Frazier would Not have seen Oswald standing there at some point. Also, there was only 1 glass door that permitted TSBD entry/exit. And Frazier was standing in front of that 1 glass door. If Prayer Man/Oswald had entered the TSBD via that front glass door in order to get himself a soda pop, Frazier would have seen Oswald at that point.

So it was Hosty and his testimony drew no questions from it.
So not many.  A few FBI agents informally not expected to comment on it

Google AI says:

“Yes, the windshield from the JFK assassination limousine was brought into the Warren Commission's hearing room and accepted as evidence on March 9, 1964.
The item, designated Commission Exhibit (CE) 351, was carried into the room wrapped in a blanket for examination by the commission members. Secret Service agents, including Roy H. Kellerman, who was in the front seat of the limousine during the shooting, were present to testify.
The windshield was a key piece of physical evidence in the investigation, particularly regarding the path of the bullets. FBI experts determined that an abrasion on the inner surface of the glass was caused by a bullet fragment impacting it from the inside of the car, corroborating the conclusion that all shots came from behind the limousine.
Today, the windshield is preserved as evidence and held by the National Archives. You can view images of the windshield through the National Archives catalog.”

https://www.google.com/search?q=was+the+windshield+from+the+JFK+assassination+limo+displayed+in+the+hearing+room+of+the+Warren+Commission+during+the+hearings&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en-us&client=safari

So, it was brought into the room on March 9, 1964 and was still there in May when Hosty testified. I would assume that many other witnesses saw the windshield in that room.

Cite your source.

Why would any witness be expected to comment in the record on something sitting there but was not asked about?
Most witnesses in Dallas gave depositions to one attorney and stenographer at the U.S. Attorney's Office in the local Post Office Building.

“Assignment: Oswald” by James Hosty, page 193:
On the day of his testimony to the commission (May 1964 if I remember correctly):

In the middle of the room was a long conference table. At the far end was a large executive-type desk, and sitting on it was the windshield from President Kennedy’s limousine. The day before, Stern had shown this windshield to Belmont, Fain, Quigley, and me. We could see pock-marks on the inside of the windshield. Stern explained that forensic experts had determined that the pockmarks were consistent with highspeed bullet fragments hitting it.

GD--


Thanks for posting.

The "JFK was shot from the front" narrative has always been squishy.

There are zero witnesses to any gunsels in the front of JFK. Sam Holland's railroad crew was atop the Third Street overpass.

The forensics papers seem written with agendas, on all sides. 

The purported blowout in the rear of JFK's skull, on his right side, should have thrown matter onto motorcyle cops to the limo's right. But matter was thrown to JFK's left.

My take is JFK was shot from behind. The GK? Maybe.

Caveat emptor, and draw your own conclusions....