JFK Assassination Forum

The car was always there but the ladies in front are blocking most of it.
The first image below is from the above photo gallery and you can see some of the car next to the lady with the folded arms and you can see the roof a little bit to her right.
I believe the car to our left is directly in front of this car and as can be seen the perspective angle relatively shortens the length and when approximately sized, fits well within the block of obscuring ladies.



Royell's Car on the extreme left and a car directly behind, shows that the car in the above image was behind Royell's car.



In this Couch frame, the end of the car is a good match compared to the folded arm lady and the roof section as compared to the ladies in Wiegman is a similar height.



JohnM

    12:35 - DPD Motorcycle Officer Haygood makes a documented radio transmission from his motorcycle parked at the (N) Elm St curb.

    12:36 - Officer Harkness makes a documented police radio transmission that he has eyewitness Amos Euins, and they are headed for the TSBD.

    12:37 -  The middle still frame above shows Inspector Sawyer's car on the (R).  Officer Harkness has already placed Euins inside the backseat of this car.

    12:38 - Officer Harkness travels to the back of the TSBD. He "secures" this area.

    12:38 -  Officer Harkness and the "alleged" Officer Haygood are captured together on the Darnell Film. (The 12:35 Haygood radio transmission from his motorcycle on the (N) Elm St curb makes this impossible. That DPD Motorcycle Cop is Not Haygood.   

GD--

Verily, it looks like Morley is leaning on the evidence.

BTW, William Walton was not a diplomat, or military attache, or even wizened pol. He was a painter, a canvas artist.

"Walton later worked for PM, a leftist newspaper in New York City.[6]"--Wiki.

"In 1949, William Walton abandoned journalism for painting. He worked primarily in abstract expressionism,[5] although he also painted in other styles.[6] His work was collected by the Corcoran Gallery of Art and the Phillips Collection,[5] and shown at galleries in Washington and New York.[6] Several important private art collectors also purchased his work.[5]"--Wiki

"One of the more public roles Walton performed in the first few months of the Kennedy administration was redecorating the White House. Walton advised Jacqueline Kennedy on the building's decor,[10] and helped redecorate the Oval Office with sculpture and paintings.[36]"--Wiki

Certain myths about JFK became canon in left-wing circles in the decades that followed the JFKA, as ideologues grappled to control the telling of the JFK legacy.

Morley is a left-wing ideologue, and that is fine, everyone is entitled to their politics.

But when reading Morley, caveat emptor, and draw your own conclusions.

RFK may indeed have suspected a domestic conspiracy in the JFKA, although he seems to have been satisfied by CIA Director  John McCone's affirmation that there had been no CIA role (RFK was a close friend/colleague of McCone).

But after 60+ years, no one has yet provided facts as to the domestic JFKA conspiracy. We are left with speculation.

Morley even suggests Mossad was involved.

In other words, we are still guessing.

Jefferson Morley Gets it Wrong Once Again 

Morley claims that a Russian file that was recently released corroborates the claim that RFK sent a message to the Soviets after the assassination that he believed it was a domestic conspiracy. The file, however, does no such thing.;



Jefferson Morley heralded an exclusive week -- about RFK and the Soviets.

Three weeks after President John F. Kennedy was shot dead in November 1963, his grieving brother Robert F. Kennedy sent a private message to the leadership of the Soviet Union asserting that the assassination “undoubtedly was the result of a large political conspiracy.”
A Kremlin document, dated December 9, 1963, is found in the Russian government’s recently released dossier on JFK’s assassination. The two-page memo shows the messenger was William Walton, an artist friend of JFK, who travelled to Moscow after the assassination.
You can download the memo written by G. Bolshakov on December 11, 1963, from Morley's website.


There are only two paragraphs about the assassination:

The assassination of President Kennedy, Walton said, undoubtedly was the result of a large political conspiracy. Perhaps there was only one assassin, but there were certainly more accomplices to the president's murder.
Dallas, Walton continued, is the ideal place for such a crime. The murder of the President there could be blamed on racists, Birchers, anyone at all.
But was the conspiracy claim Robert Kennedy's belief or message? It sounds like it is Walton's conclusion.


Towards the end of the memo, there is indeed a message from Robert Kennedy:

I spoke with Robert Kennedy and Jacqueline Kennedy before leaving for the Soviet Union, Walton continued. Robert Kennedy asked me to convey to you his warm greetings. He said, "Go to Moscow and tell them that we, for our part, will do everything possible to ensure that the political course of the United States toward the USSR remains unchanged and that the country's leadership is in firm hands."
Morley references two books that contain the story about RFK conveying a message about conspiracy through Walton to Bolshakov.


Here is the relevant passage from "One Hell of a Gamble": Khrushchev, Castro, and Kennedy, 1958-1964, by Aleksandr Fursenko and Timothy Naftali: (page 345)

Bolshakov and Walton met at the Sovietskaya restaurant. "Dallas was the ideal location for such a crime," Walton told the Soviet intelligence officer. "Perhaps there was only one assassin, but he did not act alone." Bolshakov, who had himself been deeply moved by assassination, listened intently as Walton explains that the Kennedy's believed there was a large political conspiracy behind Oswald's rifle. Despite Oswald's connections to the communist world, the Kennedy's believed that the president was felled by domestic opponents.
The footnote for this paragraph reads as follows:

Interview with Georgi Bolshakov, Jan. 28, 1989. At this interview, Bolshakov described the effect of both Kennedy assassinations on him.
The claim that RFK was conveying a message about conspiracy came from Bolshakov in 1989. Was this his real memory from the meeting in 1963, some twenty-five years earlier? Or was this an improved memory, perhaps influenced by his own views of conspiracy?


Morley says additional information about Walton's meeting, thanks to Walton's son, is in David Talbot's book, The Devil's Chessboard. But I can't find anything in that book about the meeting.


However, Talbot's book, Brothers, contains the story:

Now, in Moscow, Bobby Kennedy's representative was reporting that the attorney general's worst fears had come true. What Walton told Bolshakov over their meal at the Sovietskaya stunned the Russian. He said that Bobby and Jackie believed that the president had been killed by a large political conspiracy. "Perhaps there was only one assassin, but he did not act alone," Walton said, continuing the message from the Kennedys. There were others behind Lee Harvey Oswald's gun. J. Edgar Hoover had told both Bobby and Jackie that Oswald was a communist agent. But despite the alleged assassin's well-publicized defection to the Soviet Union and his attention-grabbing stunts on behalf of Fidel Castro, the Kennedys made it clear that they did not believe he was acting on foreign orders. They were convinced that JFK was the victim of U. S. opponents. And, Walton told Bolshakov, "Dallas was the ideal location for such a crime."
The footnote for this passage is revealing:

He said that Bobby and Jackie believed that the president had been killed by a large political conspiracy. Fursenko and Naftali, 345. Fursenko and Naftali based their account of the Walton-Bolshakov meeting on a memo that Bolshakov prepared for the GRU. Fursenko also interviewed Bolshakov in January 1989 before he died. In an interview for this book, Naftali observed, "It's possible that Bolshakov exaggerated what Walton said to him to remind his superiors how close he was to the Kennedys. Bolshakov clearly liked the fact that he had become a player, and it's possible he exaggerated a bit to get back into the inner circle. But I'd be surprised if he invented it out of whole cloth." The authors note in their book that "the GRU material on Bolshakov has been corroborated in other cases and some of the details in this document have been corroborated."
So, the only source for Robert Kennedy conveying a message about conspiracy to the Soviets is the Fursenko interview in 1989. Fursenko and Naftali did see the actual document, according to their footnotes -- but did they notice the limited attribution to RFK when Bolshakov showed them the memo?


 Even so, Naftali believed that Bolshakov might have been exaggerating. And so while he was probably not exaggerating in the memo, he was most probably exaggerating in the interview.


The real story that Morley should have reported is that "Russian Memo Does Not Corroborate Walton-Bolshakov Story."


One last point. Robert Kennedy knew about the plots against Castro. That must have been weighing on his mind right after the assassination. And as we know, he never told the Warren Commission about the plots nor did he say a word about the CIA working withe Mafia.


In 1968, according to Bill Moyers, Robert Kennedy told him that "I have ... wondering at times if we did not pay a very great price for being more energetic than wise about a lot of things, especially Cuba."


I don't think Robert Kennedy was sharing his real opinions about the assassination back in 1963 - 1964.


Hat tip: Paul Hoch helped with the production and editing of this article.



https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/jefferson-morley-gets-it-wrong-once-again

From what i can see, this analysis seems to be spot on. The Bolshakov memo can essentially be divided into two parts:

The first part is where Walton makes the assertion that the JFKA occurred as a result of a political conspiracy.

The second part is where Walton says “I spoke with Robert Kennedy and Jacqueline Kennedy…” and they have a message with is that the Kennedys will do everything in their power (RFK was still attorney general at this point) to make sure good relations are kept with the USSR and “that the countrys leadership is in firm hands.

Therefore there is a clear divide between the first part of the memo where the conspiracy is mentioned and the second part where he is saying RFK and Jackie have asked me to send you a message. The first part is Walton giving his own opinion that there was a conspiracy, not that RFK and Jackie have sent him to tell the Russian hierarchy that there was a conspiracy.

The fact that Walton is giving his own opinion in a lot of the discussion taking place at the meeting can be seen by the fact that Bolshakov keeps using phrases like “in Waltons view” and “As I see it, Walton continued, …”. There is no mention of RFK and Jackie before the mention of conspiracy in the memo. This strongly indicates therefore that Walton is giving his own opinion about the assassination and a conspiracy. This becomes clear in the second part of the memo where Bolshakov SPECIFICALLY goes on to state what RFK and Jackie have said, which differentiates it from the proceeding stuff about a conspiracy which is Waltons own personal opinion and not part of the message he was asked by RFK and Jackie to convey.

The memo, which we’ve only seen now for the first time in early 2026, therefore shoots a big hole in this common factoid that has appeared in so many JFKA books.

BUMP...

Jefferson Morley Gets it Wrong Once Again 

Morley claims that a Russian file that was recently released corroborates the claim that RFK sent a message to the Soviets after the assassination that he believed it was a domestic conspiracy. The file, however, does no such thing.;



Jefferson Morley heralded an exclusive week -- about RFK and the Soviets.

Three weeks after President John F. Kennedy was shot dead in November 1963, his grieving brother Robert F. Kennedy sent a private message to the leadership of the Soviet Union asserting that the assassination “undoubtedly was the result of a large political conspiracy.”
A Kremlin document, dated December 9, 1963, is found in the Russian government’s recently released dossier on JFK’s assassination. The two-page memo shows the messenger was William Walton, an artist friend of JFK, who travelled to Moscow after the assassination.
You can download the memo written by G. Bolshakov on December 11, 1963, from Morley's website.


There are only two paragraphs about the assassination:

The assassination of President Kennedy, Walton said, undoubtedly was the result of a large political conspiracy. Perhaps there was only one assassin, but there were certainly more accomplices to the president's murder.
Dallas, Walton continued, is the ideal place for such a crime. The murder of the President there could be blamed on racists, Birchers, anyone at all.
But was the conspiracy claim Robert Kennedy's belief or message? It sounds like it is Walton's conclusion.


Towards the end of the memo, there is indeed a message from Robert Kennedy:

I spoke with Robert Kennedy and Jacqueline Kennedy before leaving for the Soviet Union, Walton continued. Robert Kennedy asked me to convey to you his warm greetings. He said, "Go to Moscow and tell them that we, for our part, will do everything possible to ensure that the political course of the United States toward the USSR remains unchanged and that the country's leadership is in firm hands."
Morley references two books that contain the story about RFK conveying a message about conspiracy through Walton to Bolshakov.


Here is the relevant passage from "One Hell of a Gamble": Khrushchev, Castro, and Kennedy, 1958-1964, by Aleksandr Fursenko and Timothy Naftali: (page 345)

Bolshakov and Walton met at the Sovietskaya restaurant. "Dallas was the ideal location for such a crime," Walton told the Soviet intelligence officer. "Perhaps there was only one assassin, but he did not act alone." Bolshakov, who had himself been deeply moved by assassination, listened intently as Walton explains that the Kennedy's believed there was a large political conspiracy behind Oswald's rifle. Despite Oswald's connections to the communist world, the Kennedy's believed that the president was felled by domestic opponents.
The footnote for this paragraph reads as follows:

Interview with Georgi Bolshakov, Jan. 28, 1989. At this interview, Bolshakov described the effect of both Kennedy assassinations on him.
The claim that RFK was conveying a message about conspiracy came from Bolshakov in 1989. Was this his real memory from the meeting in 1963, some twenty-five years earlier? Or was this an improved memory, perhaps influenced by his own views of conspiracy?


Morley says additional information about Walton's meeting, thanks to Walton's son, is in David Talbot's book, The Devil's Chessboard. But I can't find anything in that book about the meeting.


However, Talbot's book, Brothers, contains the story:

Now, in Moscow, Bobby Kennedy's representative was reporting that the attorney general's worst fears had come true. What Walton told Bolshakov over their meal at the Sovietskaya stunned the Russian. He said that Bobby and Jackie believed that the president had been killed by a large political conspiracy. "Perhaps there was only one assassin, but he did not act alone," Walton said, continuing the message from the Kennedys. There were others behind Lee Harvey Oswald's gun. J. Edgar Hoover had told both Bobby and Jackie that Oswald was a communist agent. But despite the alleged assassin's well-publicized defection to the Soviet Union and his attention-grabbing stunts on behalf of Fidel Castro, the Kennedys made it clear that they did not believe he was acting on foreign orders. They were convinced that JFK was the victim of U. S. opponents. And, Walton told Bolshakov, "Dallas was the ideal location for such a crime."
The footnote for this passage is revealing:

He said that Bobby and Jackie believed that the president had been killed by a large political conspiracy. Fursenko and Naftali, 345. Fursenko and Naftali based their account of the Walton-Bolshakov meeting on a memo that Bolshakov prepared for the GRU. Fursenko also interviewed Bolshakov in January 1989 before he died. In an interview for this book, Naftali observed, "It's possible that Bolshakov exaggerated what Walton said to him to remind his superiors how close he was to the Kennedys. Bolshakov clearly liked the fact that he had become a player, and it's possible he exaggerated a bit to get back into the inner circle. But I'd be surprised if he invented it out of whole cloth." The authors note in their book that "the GRU material on Bolshakov has been corroborated in other cases and some of the details in this document have been corroborated."
So, the only source for Robert Kennedy conveying a message about conspiracy to the Soviets is the Fursenko interview in 1989. Fursenko and Naftali did see the actual document, according to their footnotes -- but did they notice the limited attribution to RFK when Bolshakov showed them the memo?


 Even so, Naftali believed that Bolshakov might have been exaggerating. And so while he was probably not exaggerating in the memo, he was most probably exaggerating in the interview.


The real story that Morley should have reported is that "Russian Memo Does Not Corroborate Walton-Bolshakov Story."


One last point. Robert Kennedy knew about the plots against Castro. That must have been weighing on his mind right after the assassination. And as we know, he never told the Warren Commission about the plots nor did he say a word about the CIA working withe Mafia.


In 1968, according to Bill Moyers, Robert Kennedy told him that "I have ... wondering at times if we did not pay a very great price for being more energetic than wise about a lot of things, especially Cuba."


I don't think Robert Kennedy was sharing his real opinions about the assassination back in 1963 - 1964.


Hat tip: Paul Hoch helped with the production and editing of this article.



https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/jefferson-morley-gets-it-wrong-once-again