Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10
71


    When the woman's dress neckline appeared a couple of years ago John Cotter and some other members posted that it vindicated "The much maligned Brian Doyle"...There was, of course, no honest response to Cotter's remark on the forum...The Alpha Wolves on The Education Forum have hijacked the forum and are enforcing non-mention of myself or my research under any circumstances...Gordon was still in charge when that new evidence from the 6th Floor Museum 1st generation copy of Darnell emerged so the Alpha Wolves knew they would have backing for their dishonesty and not have to account for evidence that proved they were squarely wrong and therefore had persecuted and censored an innocent researcher whose evidence proved to be correct...That's how Jim DiEugenio rolls...Gordon was, at that time, wandering away from the forum and abandoning it...Perhaps out of the realization that I had won...The Education Forum almost lost their site due to them not detecting a rogue administrator and keeping him honest...Iler knows exactly what shoes he's filling and what is expected of him...The "Moderator Team" keeps members from pointing out the sheer conflict of interest Iler's association with Jim DiEugenio represents...Iler's power is purely technical and is due to Invision's proprietary rules that are written in favor of legality instead of academic honesty...Jim D ignores all this and leans entirely on censorship and shunning and his bet pays off...Sandy Larsen also knew what was expected of him and helped save the clique from losing face by declaring that the dress neckline was a CIA forgery designed to conceal Oswald's work shirt collar...Larsen did that with no evidence what so ever on a site where Iler hypocritically announces that such evidence is required of all members...Larsen was then allowed to ignore layers of other evidence that showed the neckline was Sarah Stanton's dress neckline...Though Iler sells himself as a caller for objective proof and the best evidence he ignores that Schnapf and others have worked the forum and are using the bias they enjoy to avoid calling for the 6th Floor Museum copy of Darnell...They are avoiding that copy because the favored clique members have worked their favored status and lobbied the forum to not call for the best available copy of Darnell...The simple reason for this is because they know the 6th Floor Museum copy will expose their wrongness on Prayer Man and it is not something they are going to willingly admit while they are in control of the forum...
72
Here is an actual account written by Captain James Young on 11/21/2013. The only mention of any bullets was when he was writing about the bullets that had struck JFK. Nothing about a bullet being found in the limo.

https://www.med.navy.mil/Media/News/Article/2608993/what-price-a-rose-a-navy-physician-remembers-nov-22-1963/

Do you ever bother to vet the horseshit stories you post?

What price the roses indeed. Yeah, mom’s cousin Jerry O’Leary and Hugh Aynesworth
were pretty busy running around that day, trying to make sense of the madness. 
73
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: The First Shot
« Last post by Andrew Mason on Yesterday at 05:17:25 PM »
How do you explain the upward angle of the back shot? This bullet went on to make the dent by the mirror. Above Ks head.
If you mean the shot that passed through JBC - the second shot - the bullet could have deflected off the back of his radius and fragmented. This impact could have deflected fragments up striking the windshield and frame and at least one of the fragments may have gone over the windshield striking the road near Tague.  Greer said he heard an impact sound on the second shot. Tague believed he was struck on the second shot because he heard one shot after he felt the strike on his cheek.
74
Note that the "missle" was "removed by Commander James J. Humes." That is, it was removed from the body during the autopsy, rather than received in from outside. It can't be anything found in the limo and delivered to Bethesda, as Young would have it.

BTW, while "missile" can in this context refer to a bullet, it can also refer to a bullet fragment, bone fragment, tooth, button, or any other object propelled through a body by external force.

Well then, it should be easy to find clarification in the official documents for such a major discrepancy.
Missile is a bullet, I'm not aware of any reference of other fragments found in this case called "missiles".
Even if "removed" Humes made no further reference to it, The document was hidden until 1972.

Find an official reference that missile means fragment would clarify it as not just another lame excuse 
75
Lame excuses every time you post and fall flat on your face (again).
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md69/pages/md69_0001a.gif

22 November 1963

From: Francis X. O’Neill, Jr., Agent FBI
James W. Sibert, Agent, FBI
To: Captain J.H. Stover, Jr., Commanding Officer, U.S. Naval Medical School, National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.

1. We hereby acknowledge receipt of a missile [sic] removed by Commander James J. Humes, MC, USN on this date.

(signed)
Francis X. O’Neill, Jr.
(signed)
James W. Sibert


Note that the "missle" was "removed by Commander James J. Humes." That is, it was removed from the body during the autopsy, rather than received in from outside. It can't be anything found in the limo and delivered to Bethesda, as Young would have it.

BTW, while "missile" can in this context refer to a bullet, it can also refer to a bullet fragment, bone fragment, tooth, button, or any other object propelled through a body by external force.

76
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Education Forum Goes Off the Rails
« Last post by Brian Doyle on Yesterday at 04:16:49 PM »


Mark:   ROKC is a troll farm as their content should instantly make anyone aware...


If you look over on The Education Forum Jim D is ball room dancing with "Lori Spencer" who just posted that Sirhan shot RFK...And they are doing it in reference to the Luna Commission...

Your mischaracterizing my input towards ROKC is not appreciated by myself...I posted to them the correct information on Prayer Man as well as my evidence break-throughs...That doesn't deserve to be sold short like you do and especially from someone who offers so little research substance and appears to be posting non-seriously...
77
They have a pristine print of the Dallas Cinema Associates film, even has it listed on their site, but the video has not been released or scanned  :(
78
I'd like to apply for re-admission...I sent requests to Simkin in various places he posts but he didn't respond...

Right now I don't have access to my e-maill address because AOL heightened security and will only send a confirmation code to my hurricane-destroyed house that is no longer there...I am working on it...AOL takes itself way too seriously and needs a court order for me to get my own e-mail address back...

The moderator team is like a star chamber where they know what the clique wants and enforce it...

dang, Albert, Ian was 4 years ago just about.  yeah, Parker’s place really got down on their schadenfreude with you then.  they were so obsessed with you it was embarrassing, as were your words to them.  I suggest hiring a hacker to get your data back.  or agentic AI, or both.  you, like raff sink, have the resources, ahem. my
ni**az’ would say “you gots it like dat’”
79
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Education Forum Goes Off the Rails
« Last post by Brian Doyle on Yesterday at 03:38:59 PM »

I'd like to apply for re-admission...I sent requests to Simkin in various places he posts but he didn't respond...

Right now I don't have access to my e-maill address because AOL heightened security and will only send a confirmation code to my hurricane-destroyed house that is no longer there...I am working on it...AOL takes itself way too seriously and needs a court order for me to get my own e-mail address back...

The moderator team is like a star chamber where they know what the clique wants and enforce it...
80
if i had 360 dollars  + shipping plus taxes plus scanning costs i would buy that DCA print on ebay and scan it at Reel Revival but apparently i don't have money for that

why wouldn’t 6th floor museum buy this?  isn’t this what they do, bring the coals back to Newcastle? hey make an offer of 50 bucks, can you afford that?  truth bucks?
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10