71
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Here's Someone Everyone Should Listen To: Dr. James Carrico
« Last post by Steve Barber on Yesterday at 10:31:27 PM »Wrong...
You are just digging your hole deeper...
JFK's "side of the head" that Carrico gestures towards is facing the Knoll at the time Carrico said it was avulsive and ejecting in that direction...
You are misquoting Hargis who said the splatter hit him so hard he thought he had been shot by the bullet...That statement matches the splatter seen in that direction on the seat back cushion...You can't get around that and it is hard blood splatter forensic evidence in a direction that seriously conflicts with what Carrico is saying...
Hill went from saying too much and exactly describing the front to back Occipital wound and plug of gore to adjusting his story to resemble the official story wound just like Carrico...
The hole that you've dug yourself into is so deep you'll never see the surface, so don't talk to me about digging holes, Brian.
I have corrected so many mistakes you've made, then completely ignore.
Of course Dr. Carrico is talking about the right side of the head! Avulsed means a body part that has been completely torn or pulled away by force. Look up the word. And Dr. Carrico is describing what he saw in that area after the bullet exited the top of the head. So you're going to tell us that the mess I surrounded in red doesn't look avulsed to you? Why of course not! To you! You see only what you want to see, and what you "see" is fantasy. Where Dr. Carrico has his fingers placed on his head isn't where the wound is, and I am definitely not saying that it is, either. Where he has his fingers is where the large skull flap/piece is hanging by scalp, a portion of which connects to the top of the skull. Funny thing. Almost everyone who describes JFK's head wound thinks that that massive skull fragment is the head wound, when it isn't. It's a flap of skull hanging upside down and inside out, facing the camera.
I am not misquoting Hargis! Hargis never, at any time, said that he was hit by a "force"! Get with the program, Brian. Tink Thompson started that crap in "Six Seconds in Dallas" about Hargis being hit with such "force...", and then he inserted something Hargis said to the New York Daily News the day after the assassination to try to make his point. Nowhere at any time during any of the interviews Hargis gave to individuals or groups that have been made public about being struck by head matter with any "force".
Recent Posts
