JFK Assassination Forum

That is what the fibers indicate for anyone capable of adding 2 + 2 and getting the right answer. I guess that leaves you out.
You seem to lack the intellectual courage to actually tell us what you believe. You seem to be more interested in playing word games. I've seen your kind before over the last 35 years. People who troll forums just to play word games without ever saying what they believe because that would require you to support what you say.
More trolling. You add nothing to the discourse.
I don't need a jury to tell me Oswald murdered two men on 11/22/1963 and you don't need a jury to play your silly games.
The same number as I had before I started engaging with you.
You've never given any indication you know shit about the case. You're only here to play games. That's pretty obvious.
The fact the built a museum on the same floor Oswald fired his shots from and created a glassed in enclosure around the location he fired from and installed a webcam there is a better indication of who they believe killed JFK.
You don't seem to have a pair either. I respect people who will say what they believe and defend those beliefs honestly, even if I disagree with them. That doesn't include you. You get your jollies by trolling. You've made that obvious.
I've come to realize you have no beliefs. You're a troll.
I'm done playing your silly ass trolling games. When you grow the stones to tell us what you believe and are willing to support those beliefs, let me know. Until then, you aren't worth the time of day.

Yet he said he did not feel pain until he got to Parkland and got out of the car.  So the expression on his face is not pain.  Perhaps it is fear - the fear, having just heard a rifle shot, that an assassination of the President was underway. If only we had evidence that this is what he did after JFK started reacting to the shot through his neck.....

You are really rationalizing your duplicitous conduct, aren't you?

No. It's not my problem thay you don't understand what quotation marks are used for.

You wouldn't say why you don't think it was a coincidence because that would put the burden on your to show evidence for your claim. I'm going to guess you are implying the fiber evidence was planted even though we both know you have no evidence that happened. If that's not what you were implying, why don't you tell us what you were implying when you said it was no coincidence.

Nice one. Moving the goalpost away from your ridiculous claims that fibers prove who fired the rifle and/of that it was Oswald's jacket that was found under the car.

Thank you for confirming that I do not need to show evidence because I never made any claim.

It's actually a lot more fun to see you speculate, and you instantly started doing exactly that. What makes you think that I think fiber evidence was planted? If fibers similar to Oswald's shirt were found in a jacket that we know belonged to Oswald, then there is no reason to believe the fibers were planted. As for the rifle and the fibers found on that; if you claim those fibers matched the shirt Oswald was wearing on Friday morning, you need to prove that and it's pretty obvious you can't.

A jury convicted Wayne Williams primarily on fiber evidence. Apparently they didn't think it was BS. Neither do most thinking people. So tell us why fiber evidence was proof beyond a reasonable doubt in the Wayne Williams case but isn't probative in the case against Oswald. 

I know nothing about that case, but even if that case and Oswald's case were perfectly similar, that still doesn't mean you will automatically the same outcome. A jury can be swayed by the arguments of a good prosecutor or defence lawyer (remember O.J.'s "I it don't fit you must aquit) and frequently juries get it wrong. All you need to look at are all the cases the innocence project has gotten overturned. You can't compare one case to another, no matter how hard you try.

Apparently they didn't think it was BS. Neither do most thinking people.

Just how many "thinking people" have you talked to, to justify that claim?

Cite just one respected news or historical publication that doesn't identify Oswald as the assassin. I would have no problem citing plenty that do.

I don't use history books or other material written by writers with an agenda, so I'm not going to do that. The only JFKA related book I've ever read is the WC report. I stayed well clear of all the other opinions by so-called researchers on both side. What I know about the case is what I found out by doing my own research. You should try it....

But I'll throw you a bone; even the plaque fixed to the former TSBD building says "when Lee Harvey Oswald allegedly shot and killed President Kennedy. Say enough, really....

You really are an optimist if you think 500 years from now you and your CT comrades will be vindicated.

Silly remark, which only shows your "us against them" mindset. I don't have CT comrades and I don't have to be vindicated for the simple fact of rejecting the BS you're trying to sell about this entire case.

Very convenient. By remaining agnostic, you relieve yourself of the burden of providing evidence to support your beliefs.

So, now you are a mind reader? What beliefs should I be supporting? I've told you what I think and even that's not good enough for you. Stop nagging, will ya!

Every poll I remember doesn't even bother to ask people if the think Oswald was innocent. Apparently they pollsters take it as a given that Oswald was guilty. Given the amount of evidence against him, that is a very understandable POV. I have a vague memory of seeing a poll somewhere that included the option that Oswald was completely innocent and that number was in the single digits. I've searched for a poll that offers that as a choice and have come up empty. If you know of such a poll, by all means, post it.

Oh boy, you claimed that "even among CTs, the majority belief is that Oswald was one of the assassins.". No mention of polls or anything. So, why don't we start with you claim and you provide evidence for it? If you don't, I'll take that as an admission for you making it up.