The manhole did have a gouge in it did it not? Is not there a photo of the manhole cover showing there is a mark? ( or am I experiencing the Mandela effect?)

If there is no photo then it’s just a witness having seen something but no actual physical evidence
on the manhole cover, and the bullet (or partial bullet with missing lead ) that caused the uprooted grass,   not in the archives or in WC documented items, means either it was not found or that there was  a post event conspiracy of avoiding introducing that bullet.

Why does it always wind up there being a possibility of conspiracy? The photo with the man reaching into that uprooted grass, where is his WC testimony?

Dans Z224 1st shot sequence fits better than any other of the LN 1st shot miss sequences with a 3rd shot that could possibly have hit  the manhole cover. It’s an unaimed shot 2 secs after Z313. If it’s possible a lead fragment separated from the copper jacket and flew across the green to strike the curb near Tague, then that fragment was probably traveling at least 1500ft/ sec which would have been enough to cause some concrete debris from the curb causing Tagues cheek wound. It fits closer with Norman’s shot spacing and with Tagues recollection ( he said it was the 2nd OR the 3rd shot). And 4.8 secs then 2 secs is lot closer to the 75%witness heard  shot pattern of 1… 2.3 than any LN Z140 thru Z170 1st shot missed sequence that is 9-10secs in duration.

Andrew’s Z190-Z270-Z313 sequence is the only other LN proposal but where in there could the manhole cover have been hit?

Come on Andrew, let's not go through all this yet again.

The location of the hole in the clothing such as a jacket that is free to move around can be misleading. You also have the jacket on a hanger. Here it is on the body:

 

Just be honest.
Look at the image of JBC's jacket above and how low down the bullet hole is.
Remember the bullet exits on a downward trajectory, so his wrist would have to be even lower than the bullet hole.

Now look at how high up JBC is holding his wrist in z271.

All you need to do is be honest.

The bullet struck just above the end of the jacket cuff and struck the middle of the french cuff:



To suggest that one has to be dishonest to argue that JBC was struck on the second shot at z271 is to demonstrate a lack of understanding of all the evidence.

I've looked at a number of online dictionary definitions of "missile", some of which would apply to a bullet fragment and others which would not. It really isn't important. It is what the person who used the term "missile" meant by it. If that person considered a fragment to be a missile, then it is a missile.

Does nothing to clarify the receipt dated 11/22/63
lame with a bit of mumbo-jumbo on the side

You are offering yourself and your shallow nay-saying as not only on parr with Armstrong but better...

I think any review or your material vs Armstrong's sleuthing shows that for what it is...

Just Armstrong's Westbrook material is near genius work and cracks the case...

Do you believe Westbrook when he says he walked from the Police Station to the Depository?

The case was "cracked" 12 hours after Oswald killed JFK. That's when the DPD formally charged him with JFK's murder. They had already charged him with killing Tippit a few hours earlier.

Everything that has been learned since and all the advances in the forensic sciences has only served to make that case stronger. There is no rational explanation of the JFKA that doesn't have Oswald as the man who fired the shots at JFK and who later killed Tippit.