Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10
71
TG-

In your conspiracy theory, what mechanisms or carrots did Bruce Solie use to induce LHO to suddenly quit the Marines, not that long before he would have received a discharge anyway, and try to enter Russia?

Who is a likely "cut-out" between Solie and LHO? How did LHO and Solie communicate?

In your theorizing, did Solie coordinate with the KGB on allowing LHO into Russia?

If so, was the whole phony LHO wrist-slitting in the hotye bath-tub drama a staged event, to make it appear to other CIA'ers that LHO was a "earnest" defector and a nut, and not a de facto KGB asset?

In other words, Solie, LHO and the KGB surreptiuosly conspired to trick Angleton and others?

When LHO went to MC Russia embassy in Sept. 1963, did LHO know we was meeting KGB'ers? Had Solie advised him on that matter?

What is your theory on that?


72
Had I been on the jury in the Clay Shaw trial, I would have voted not guilty. I have not however read the Garrison book On the Trail of the Assassins and base this verdict on the Oliver Stone movie JFK, which is entertaining but for a large part speculation and fantasy.

Garrison lied in his 1988 book, On the Trail of the Assassins, when he said he didn't find out until after the 1969 trial that the (Communist-owned) Italian newspaper Paese Sera had published an article three days after he had arrested Clay Shaw in March 1967 (on suspicion of having masterminded a homosexual thrill-kill assassination of JFK!), which Paese Sera article claimed that Shaw was an evil, evil CIA agent and that he had tried to help reinstate Fascism in Italy in the 1950s!

Factoid: Joan Mellen's ex-husband, far-left Ralph Schoenman (who was far-left Bertran Russell's secretary in London) had provided Garrison in 1967 with a translated-into-English knockoff version of the story that was published in the far-left French newspaper, L' Humanite.

Our very own Gary "Snideness" Aguilar debated Max Holland on this issue several years ago on C-Span and tried to destroy Holland's argument by pointing out that a far-left French newspaper had published an article on the 1961 "Generals' Plot" a day or two before Paese Sera had.

LOL!

https://www.c-span.org/program/american-history-tv/warren-report-the-garrison-investigation/136882
73
Your theory depends on 8 highly improbable to impossible events. It is not even close to being plausible. There is no talking any sense into you. You will continue to delude yourself no matter how many problems with your goofball theory are pointed out to you.

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over an over again and expecting a different result. It appears no matter how many problems I point out to you, you will continue with your silly rationalizations to convince yourself the impossible occurred. There is no point in me bothering to dissuade you from your fantasy. It is a joke and the joke is on you.
If you had actually had read my reply you would realize that your items 2, 3 and 5 are patently wrong and your number would be 5 not 8.  And if you actually read and understood the other five you would have realized they required a response.

The only joke is your pretence of being serious about this discussion.   

There are objective evidentiary problems with the SBT - just the SBT not the WC conclusion.
74
There was a clear consensus of the witnesses that 3 shots were fired. With 3 recovered shells and 2 recovered bullets, all positively traced to Oswald's rifle. Does it take a genius to figure out what the caliber of that lost bullet was and which rifle fired it?

   And you also forgot the HSCA "4th shot". This is what happens when you present only hand picked portions of a story. That story is quickly dismantled piece-by-piece.
75
   Nice attempted dodge. There is a "Lost Bullet".

There was a clear consensus of the witnesses that 3 shots were fired. With 3 recovered shells and 2 recovered bullets, all positively traced to Oswald's rifle. Does it take a genius to figure out what the caliber of that lost bullet was and which rifle fired it?
76
Your theory depends on 8 highly improbable to impossible events. It is not even close to being plausible. There is no talking any sense into you. You will continue to delude yourself no matter how many problems with your goofball theory are pointed out to you.

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over an over again and expecting a different result. It appears no matter how many problems I point out to you, you will continue with your silly rationalizations to convince yourself the impossible occurred. There is no point in me bothering to dissuade you from your fantasy. It is a joke and the joke is on you.
77
Hello Everyone,

This is my first post - apologies if this topic has been broached before, I was unable to find it using the search feature.

I have followed and tracked the statements recorded by David Lifton and Doug Horne for many years.  I feel I have stitched together the - admittedly complex and at times hard to believe - timeline of events concerning the casket(s) and body from Parkland to Bethesda.

The one piece of the puzzle which I cannot fit is based on an "off the record" conversation between David Lifton and Richard Lipsey where no recording equipment was permitted or used.

Lipsey stated - and Lifton directly quoted him - that JFK's left arm was raised like a "Heil Hitler salute" when he saw the body at Bethesda.  Furthermore, Lipsey said that "Humes had to jump on the body and lower it with his knee."

Lifton has discussed this in a few online videos including this series -
Lifton proceeded to hypothesise why the left arm - and only the left arm - was raised.  He implied that this was due to storage conditions for the body aboard the luggage compartment of Air Force 1.

Irrespective of how it was raised, if we take Lipsey at his word, we assume the arm was as raised as it was, I have a major problem.

What I know to be true is that the body was delivered inside a "zipped body bag" inside a "shipping casket" by helicopter, then black cadillac hearse to the back door of the Bethesday morgue at rougly 6:35pm.

Looking at both the zipped body bag (as cofirmed by Paul O'Connor at Bethesday) and the grey shipping casket (as confirmed by Jim Jenkins at Bethesda) I can't physically see how JFK's arm could have been raised at all.  There just isn't the room inside the body bag NOR the casket.

I would warmly welcome this great community to challenge me on this and I am open to being convinced that this is simply a false statement from Lipsey - he is the only person as far as I know that stated this. Equally, I'm open to being told that the body bags have plenty of room for a raised arm - but logistically, I'm sceptical.

I'm looking forward to your comments.

Thank you.

  Welcome Darragh. Good to have you aboard.
78
Why would you do that? Their theory of postmortem surgery is among the silliest ever made about the JFKA.That's an understatement.And here I though Lifton was crazy. What was I thinking?About as silly as the rest of his theory. No more. No less.Why would anyone do that?What else do you know that isn't true?I'm not at all surprised you think Paul O'Connor is a credible witness.You're starting to sound rational now.I think I already have.Not only is Lipsey off his rocker, so are Lifton and Horne. The whole body snatcher theory of postmortem surgery is as silly as it gets. It's been about 10 years since I've seen a proponent of this goofball scenario. It is absolutely preposterous to think that postmortem surgery could have been performed on the body and that the pathologists wouldn't have instantly recoginzed it. Even a first year medical student wouldn't be fooled by something like that.

   Did you forget about the, "surgery to the head area", declaration that Lifton discovered buried inside the 26 Volumes? Your "pathologist" claim above is incorrect based on this being in the 26 volumes.
79
On that we can agree.I wouldn't call the 6.5mm Carcano routine. It wasn't a commonly used round, but there was nothing exceptional about it. It falls right between the WWII standard .30-06 (7.62mm) round and the current NATO round of 5.56mm now in use.
Simply pointing out that people think shooting victims get thrown forcefully by a gunshot like they see in the movies.

Both bullets recovered were 6.5mm Carcano bullets. So were the only three recovered shells. There is no evidence of any other bullet fired in Dealey Plaza that day.

   Nice attempted dodge. There is a "Lost Bullet".
80
So you think a witness who said "I guess" and then wasn't sure if it was the second or third shot is compelling? Why am I not surprised.

He initially said he "would guess it was either the second or third".   But when asked whether he heard any more shots after he felt the hit in the face he thought about it and said "I believe I did".  When asked "You think you did?" he replied "I believe I did" "I believe that it was the second shot. So I heard the third shot afterwards".  He has never deviated from that since.  As I say, it is not the greatest evidence but it is evidence.  So it is factually incorrect to say that there is no evidence as to which shot struck Tague.  And, for what it is worth, it fits with what Greer said about sensing an impact in the car on the second shot. (The dent in the windshield frame was within a foot of his right ear).
Quote
He even disagrees with the consensus of opinion that the Hertz clock as 12:30. Nothing he said establishes anything as a fact. He's guessing about everything.
If I had known you were going to question that I would have added the next question and answer (7 H 555):

"Mr. LIEBELER. That was about the time that you felt yourself struck?
Mr. TAGUE. I just glanced. I mean I just stopped, got out of my car, and here came the motorcade. I just happened upon the scene."

So it appears that the time 12:29 may have been when he glanced at the clock as he was getting out of the car which was just before the shots. Others looked at the clock after the shots and said it read 12:30.
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10