Sarah Stanton.

The clique protects Prayer Man and corrupts JFK research...

Even Morley is afraid to elaborate...

Not one word about obtaining and scanning the 6th Floor Museum 1st generation copy...Instead we get Larry Schnapf pandering to the Prayer Man people and explaining why the Task Force is never going to try to get the 6th Floor copy...That is a direct serving of the Prayer Man groups' (Greg Parker) corruption of JFK research...The reason there is no discussion of the 6th Floor Museum Jones copy showing Sarah Stanton's dress neckline is because the hijacking clique on The Education Forum is completely aware that it proves Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...The Luna Task Force could obtain the 6th Floor Museum 1st generation copy any time it desired only the Prayer Man people have reached their slimy octopus arm of corruption all they way to Congress via DiEugenio...Ask Andrew Iler how he defines that via the site rules...It isn't what you know it is who you know via the buddy buddy system that fraudulent forum operates under...

How honest is it for Mr Unger to bring the film that finally settled the Prayer Man issue to The Education Forum and not discuss or show its most important aspect?...

The reason there is no participation in Robin's thread over there on the EF is because they know it shows Stanton's dress neckline and they are intentionally de-populating the subject in order to avoid the Prayer Man head-hunters...

Your entire article is nothing more than a litany of excuses for dismissing all that damning evidence against Oswald. If your excuses carried any weight, you should be able to put together a plausible alternative narrative that takes into account all that evidence including your pathetic excuses. We both know that no such plausible alternative narrative is possible or somebody would have come up with one by now. It's been almost 63 years since the assassination and no one has come close to developing a scenario that explains the entire body of evidence. CTs are in the business of explaining away the evidence as your article demonstrates.

Uh-huh. You bet. IOW, your scenario has been debunked by physical evidence, by scientific evidence, by rifle tests, by reenactments, and by numerous released documents, but it must still be true because no one has presented an alternative scenario that you are willing to accept. That's what you're saying.

How about if you write an article that responds to the points and evidence presented in my article? Hey? Oh, but in order to do that, you'd have to actually read my article.

I made a typo error. I meant Z223. We agree that JFK and JC are reacting to same bullet. Yes I like the Z223 as a 1st shot hit followed  4.8 sec later for 2nd shot at Z312, then a 2.5 sec 3rd shot that was not aimed but just a final “exclamation” shot which a kook like Oswald might have done. ( he kept the rifle sticking out several seconds after Z313 such that Bob Jackson and Malcolm Couch spotted it and saw it “slowly withdrawn” as though the gunman was enjoying watching the pandemonium reactions of the crowd.

Oswald apparently was considering a fourth shot because he chambered his last round. Just as apparent is he decided it wasn't necessary. The evidence for a shot following the headshot is as thin as gruel.

The only way that Givens story would make any sense at all is if Arnold Rowland made up his pre event sighting of a man at the SE window 6th floor TSBD.

Because if Oswald was originally planning to shoot from SW window , he would not have been at the SE preparing the SE window 3 stacked boxes when Givens saw him at about 11:55.

So the 3 boxes would have to been placed only after Oswald had gone to SW window at 12:15 and saw Bonnie Ray Williams which prompted Oswald to quickly retreat from the SW window.

I have a viable scenario  for Oswald as the 6th floor shooter only if I can have some variation of timing allowed for Mrs Garner, Carolyn Arnold, and allowance for the 2nd half of Arnold Rowlands story of sighting the “elderly black man” at SW window at 12:15 as being a post event mistaken memory of seeing Harold Norman with dust in his hair.

Also I need a minute or more for the Bronson film starting at 12:26 or 12:27 rather than 12:25. I think is possible because it’s not CERTAIN that the Bronson film begins at 12:25.

Then the shooting sequence I use is Dans Z223 1st shot hit , Z313 2nd shot hit and 3rd shot 2.5 secs after Z313 as a “celebration” or “exclamation” shot fired unaimed because Oswald was a Kook. This fits with the 1….2.3 pattern , is about only 6.5 sec for all 3 shots with fits close enough to Harold Norman’s 4-5 sec recall as well as the general witness perception of 3 shots fired rapidly.

There is no evidence Oswald ever planned to shoot from the SW window. He might have scouted different locations and considered his options. He settled on the the SE window and it is clear that was the best choice because it allowed him to fire directly down Elm St. A shot from the SW window would have given him a difficult cross shot. He might have considered the SW window to see if shooting at the limo as it approached was a viable choice. The results vindicated his choice of the SE window.