Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10
71
The JFK brain matter that contained this trail of fine small particles was not preserved nor were those tiny particles ever removed and examined to see if they could be matched to 6.5 mm MC ammo.  Just coincidence?

Actually, fragments from the brain were compared to the fragments found inside the limo and fragments from JBC's wrist were compared to CE399, both by the FBI in 1964 and by Dr. Vincent Guinn for the HSCA in 1977. Ken Rahn wrote an excellent article about it. Rather than put my own spin on what those tests did or didn't prove, I'll post the article and everyone can decide for themselves.

https://kenrahn.com/JFK/Scientific_topics/NAA/NAA_and_JFK_assassination.html
72
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: When Was JBC Hit?
« Last post by Tom Graves on Yesterday at 12:24:19 AM »
There are at least 25 witnesses who reported seeing JFK's reacting to the first shot.

Those 25 witnesses evidently mistook the "backfire-like" sound of Oswald's first shot at "Z-124" as a backfire, a firecracker, or maybe even a blowout.

That, coupled with the fact that JFK's "startle reaction" was undoubtedly too subtle to be observable, the fact that his and Jackie's conscious head turning around Z-139 evoked their inquisitiveness, if anything, and the fact that the first shot missed everything, led them to mistakenly believe that Oswald's second shot around Z-222 was his first one -- for the simple reason that JFK's and JBC's reactions were quite noticeable only after they were both wounded by CE-399.
73
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: When Was JBC Hit?
« Last post by Tom Graves on Yesterday at 12:11:58 AM »
Why don’t you describe the changes you see between frame z139, z144 and z150 and give us your sense of where [the limo's passengers] are all facing?

In Z-139, JFK, who has been waving to spectators on his right (but not yet to Mary Woodward and Co. who are further down the street towards Zapruder), has begun quickly turning his head to his left in Jackie's direction. He looks in that direction for about a second and then, by Z-160, starts turning his head back to his right. By Z-175, he has turned his head far to his right and has started waving to Woodward and Co.

In Z-139, Jackie is already looking somewhat to her left. By Z-144 she starts turning her head farther to her left and "maxes out" in that direction by Z-161 when Robert Croft "captures" her with a concerned look on her face.

Around Z-139, Connally, who has been looking to his right and who heard Oswald's first shot less than a second earlier, turns his head even farther to his right and then, at Z-150, starts turning it quickly to his left and is "captured" looking "straight ahead" in the Croft photo. Then, around Z-165, he starts turning his head to his far right in a vain attempt to catch a glimpse of JFK over his right shoulder. 

Nellie, who has been looking more or less straight ahead, begins turning her head far to her right by Z-144.

Kellerman, who has been looking more or less straight ahead, begins looking to his right/down by Z-148.


What else would you like to know?
74
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: When Was JBC Hit?
« Last post by Andrew Mason on July 22, 2026, 11:11:44 PM »
It’s telling that you left out Woodward’s reporting that the limo came “nearly to a halt” after the “backfire-like” missing-everything first shot.

As you and I both know, the limo didn’t slow down nearly to a halt until after JFK (and JBC) had been wounded (by CE-399) around Z-222.

The fact that she said that is an indication that she confused what occurred after Z-222 with what happened after Oswald’s “backfire-like” missing-everything shot at “Z-124.”

That, plus the fact that JFK didn’t start waving to Woodward and Co. until Z-175, is confirmation that my analysis is correct: Woodward jumbled the events surrounding the first and second shots.

But at least she was correct in saying there were three shots and that the first shot missed everything.
The problem you have with Woodward’s hazy sense that JFK was not hit on the first shot is that there are at least 25 witnesses who reported seeing him react to the first shot.  We don’t even know what she was watching and even she says that things were a little hazy.  Finally, her insistence that the second and third shots were rapid eliminates the possibility that the first shot missed.
75
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: When Was JBC Hit?
« Last post by Andrew Mason on July 22, 2026, 11:05:31 PM »
In that case, you're either blind or a prevaricator.

Which is it?
I could say the same thing about you but I believe in observing civility norms.

Besides I explained in detail what I see and why I disagree. It is readily apparent that JFK turns from about an 11 o’clock direction to 10 o’clock. Jackie turns from about 10 o’clock to 9:30. Those don’t appear to be unusual at all. Nellie and JBC turn from sharp left to about forward.  A bit quicker and larger turn, but still nothing really unusual.


So why don’t you describe the changes you see between frame z139, z144 and z150 and give us your sense of where they are all facing.
76
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: When Was JBC Hit?
« Last post by Tom Graves on July 22, 2026, 11:00:15 PM »
[...]

It’s telling that you left out Woodward’s reporting that the limo came “nearly to a halt” after the “backfire-like” missing-everything first shot.

As you and I both know, the limo didn’t slow down nearly to a halt until after JFK (and JBC) had been wounded (by CE-399) around Z-222.

The fact that she said that is an indication that she confused what occurred after Z-222 with what happened before and after Oswald’s “backfire-like” missing-everything shot at “Z-124.”

That, plus the fact that JFK didn’t start waving to Woodward and Co. until Z-175, is confirmation that my analysis is correct: Woodward jumbled the events surrounding the first and second shots.

But, hey, at least she was correct in saying there were three shots and that the first shot missed everything!
77
So many researchers have swallowed down the 'sharpened' image supposedly identifying Shelley and Lovelady on the Elm Street Extension approximately 20-25 seconds after the shooting.
What these researchers reach for is the WC testimonies of these men in which they state they wandered along the extension after the shooting.
However, what these same researchers are willing to ignore in the same testimonies boggles the mind:

Both men state they remained on the steps after the shooting until Gloria Calvery came up to the steps.
Both men testified that it was at least 3 minutes until Gloria came running up.
Both men testified that they only left the steps after listening to Gloria talk about the shooting.
Both men testified that they then moved out to the "little old island" after interacting with Gloria.
Both men testified that it was AFTER they left the steps that they turned around and saw Truly and Baker still outside the building.

The WC testimony of both men is a tissue of easily disprovable lies. Lies disproven by the Darnell/Couch footage. Disproven by the Truly/Baker time trials. Disproven by the testimony of Victoria Adams who saw both men on the first floor approximately 60 seconds after the shooting. Disproven by their own same-day affidavits, which make no mention of this fictitious trip along the extension.
Below is a still from the Darnell footage taken approximately 20 seconds after the shooting. This is the same moment the "fake" Shelley and Lovelady are walking along the extension. It shows the moment Gloria reaches the steps and is telling everyone about the shooting. Lovelady is directly in front of her listening to what she is saying. Shelley is near the bottom of the steps after returning from the "little old island" where he met Gloria running the other way.



It is physically impossible for Shelley and Lovelady to be walking along the extension in the Darnell/Couch footage if they have to wait for Gloria to arrive.

   BUMP
78
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: When Was JBC Hit?
« Last post by Tom Graves on July 22, 2026, 10:30:28 PM »

ME: Do you deny that JFK, Jackie, Connally, Nellie, and Kellerman all quicky turned their heads during the half-second between Z-140 and Z-150, and that the first three turned their heads to the left, whereas the last two turned their heads to the right?

YOU: Yes I do.


In that case, you're either blind or a prevaricator.

Which is it?
79
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: When Was JBC Hit?
« Last post by Andrew Mason on July 22, 2026, 10:16:48 PM »
You must think quite hard to come up with all of the lame rationalizations and scenarios that you do.

Poor thing, you must be exhausted!
Just following what is seen in the zfilm.  He lifts his right arm and turns around to the right.  Why would he not lift his arm before turning?
80
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: When Was JBC Hit?
« Last post by Andrew Mason on July 22, 2026, 10:10:35 PM »
Do you deny that JFK, Jackie, Connally, Nellie, and Kellerman all quicky turned their heads during the half-second between Z-140 and Z-150, and that the first three turned their heads to the left, whereas the last two turned their heads to the right?
Yes I do.

At z139 I see JBC looking to his right at about 3 o'clock and JFK looking to his left at about 11 o'clock. Jackie is looking to her left at about 10 o'clock. I can't see where Nellie or Kellerman are looking although it looks like Nellie's shoulders are turned to about a 2:30 o'clock position.

By z144 JFK is turned a bit farther left facing a 10 o'clock position.  Jackie is facing the same position she was in at z139, looking to her left at 10 o'clock. JBC has turned and appears to be facing forward.  I still can't see Kellerman. Nellie seems to have moved slightly to a 2 o'clock shoulder position and may be facing her husband.

At z150 there is no change to JFK - still looking at about a about a 10:00 o'clock direction. Jackie is still facing left, but a bit more than in z139 - maybe facing in a 9:30 o'clock direction. I still can't see Kellerman.  Nellie has turned a bit more forward and her shoulders are facing a 1 o'clock direction.  If the light part above her neck (blocked parially by the rearview mirror) is her face, then she is facing the same direction as well.

So, yes, I do not agree "that JFK, Jackie, Connally, Nellie, and Kellerman all quicky turned their heads during the half-second between Z-140 and Z-150, and that the first three turned their heads to the left, whereas the last two turned their heads to the right".

Quote
Do you deny that JFK and Jackie quicky turned their heads to their left at Z-143, two seconds before JFK waved to Mary Woodward and Co. on his right?
I have said what I see. I don't see any quick turn by JFK or Jackie there.  At least you are now acknowledging that the turn to the right at about z172 by both JFK and JBC and a bit later by Jackie was in response to Mary Woodward's shouts.   Now you just have to accept that she was right that they turned and waved before the first "horrible ear-shattering noise".

Quote
Didn't Woodward say in her 11/23 DMN article that after the "backfire-like" missing-everything first shot, JFK and Jackie looked around as if to say, "What the heck was that?"

Mary Woodward:

"The President and Mrs. Kennedy turned and looked around, as if they, too, didn’t believe the noise was really coming from a gun. Then after a moment’s pause there was another shot and I saw the President start slumping in the car."
She did not refer to the first shot as a "missing-everything first shot".  She said "After acknowledging our cheers, he faced forward again and suddenly there was a horrible, ear-shattering noise coming from behind us and a little to the right".  "Things are a little hazy from this point, but I don't believe anyone was hit with the first bullet.  The President and Mrs. Kennedy turned and looked around, as if they, too, didn't believe the noise was really coming from a gun.  Then after a moment's pause there was another shot and I saw the President start slumping in the car. This was followed rapidly by another shot (she does not describe the effect but describes Jackie standing up and falling on top of her husband's body.)

She elaborated more on the rapidity of the last two shots in 1988. In a 1988 interview by Nigel Turner for the film "The Men Who Killed Kennedy", Mary Woodward stated: “The second two shots were immediate --- it was almost as if one were an echo of the other -- they came so quickly. The sound of one did not cease until the second shot.” … “and then the third shot came very, very quickly, on top of the second one”


So I conclude that her "a little hazy" sense that JFK was not hit by the first shot has to be looked at in connection with other things she observed: 1. that the first shot occurred as JFK turned forward after acknowledging their cheers. JFK is not turned forward prior to z193. 2.  that she may not have been looking at JFK closely after the first shot.  She may have looked up at the overpass. In her December 7, 1963 FBI statement: "She stated that her first reaction was that the shots had been fired from above her head and from possibly behind her.  Her next reaction was that the shots might have come from the overpass which was to her right... She stated that she had seen about five or six persons attending on top of the overpass and possibly this is why her first reaction was to look at the top of this overpass." 3. that the last two shots were rapid - much less than five seconds apart. That observation excludes the possibility that JFK was not hit until the second shot since he is reacting at least 5 seconds before the last shot.
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10