When the woman's dress neckline appeared a couple of years ago John Cotter and some other members posted that it vindicated "The much maligned Brian Doyle"...There was, of course, no honest response to Cotter's remark on the forum...The Alpha Wolves on The Education Forum have hijacked the forum and are enforcing non-mention of myself or my research under any circumstances...Gordon was still in charge when that new evidence from the 6th Floor Museum 1st generation copy of Darnell emerged so the Alpha Wolves knew they would have backing for their dishonesty and not have to account for evidence that proved they were squarely wrong and therefore had persecuted and censored an innocent researcher whose evidence proved to be correct...That's how Jim DiEugenio rolls...Gordon was, at that time, wandering away from the forum and abandoning it...Perhaps out of the realization that I had won...The Education Forum almost lost their site due to them not detecting a rogue administrator and keeping him honest...Iler knows exactly what shoes he's filling and what is expected of him...The "Moderator Team" keeps members from pointing out the sheer conflict of interest Iler's association with Jim DiEugenio represents...Iler's power is purely technical and is due to Invision's proprietary rules that are written in favor of legality instead of academic honesty...Jim D ignores all this and leans entirely on censorship and shunning and his bet pays off...Sandy Larsen also knew what was expected of him and helped save the clique from losing face by declaring that the dress neckline was a CIA forgery designed to conceal Oswald's work shirt collar...Larsen did that with no evidence what so ever on a site where Iler hypocritically announces that such evidence is required of all members...Larsen was then allowed to ignore layers of other evidence that showed the neckline was Sarah Stanton's dress neckline...Though Iler sells himself as a caller for objective proof and the best evidence he ignores that Schnapf and others have worked the forum and are using the bias they enjoy to avoid calling for the 6th Floor Museum copy of Darnell...They are avoiding that copy because the favored clique members have worked their favored status and lobbied the forum to not call for the best available copy of Darnell...The simple reason for this is because they know the 6th Floor Museum copy will expose their wrongness on Prayer Man and it is not something they are going to willingly admit while they are in control of the forum...

How do you explain the upward angle of the back shot? This bullet went on to make the dent by the mirror. Above Ks head.

If you mean the shot that passed through JBC - the second shot - the bullet could have deflected off the back of his radius and fragmented. This impact could have deflected fragments up striking the windshield and frame and at least one of the fragments may have gone over the windshield striking the road near Tague.  Greer said he heard an impact sound on the second shot. Tague believed he was struck on the second shot because he heard one shot after he felt the strike on his cheek.

Lame excuses every time you post and fall flat on your face (again).
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md69/pages/md69_0001a.gif

22 November 1963

From: Francis X. O’Neill, Jr., Agent FBI
James W. Sibert, Agent, FBI
To: Captain J.H. Stover, Jr., Commanding Officer, U.S. Naval Medical School, National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.

1. We hereby acknowledge receipt of a missile [sic] removed by Commander James J. Humes, MC, USN on this date.

(signed)
Francis X. O’Neill, Jr.
(signed)
James W. Sibert

Note that the "missle" was "removed by Commander James J. Humes." That is, it was removed from the body during the autopsy, rather than received in from outside. It can't be anything found in the limo and delivered to Bethesda, as Young would have it.

BTW, while "missile" can in this context refer to a bullet, it can also refer to a bullet fragment, bone fragment, tooth, button, or any other object propelled through a body by external force.

They have a pristine print of the Dallas Cinema Associates film, even has it listed on their site, but the video has not been released or scanned 

I'd like to apply for re-admission...I sent requests to Simkin in various places he posts but he didn't respond...

Right now I don't have access to my e-maill address because AOL heightened security and will only send a confirmation code to my hurricane-destroyed house that is no longer there...I am working on it...AOL takes itself way too seriously and needs a court order for me to get my own e-mail address back...

The moderator team is like a star chamber where they know what the clique wants and enforce it...