Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10
71
    Regarding the unidentified eyewitnesses inside Dealey Plaza, are you referring to Gordon Arnold?
   

For those following this thread who don't know who Gordon Arnold is.

72
The JFK Autopsy Back Photo speaks for itself.

Dear Sonderführer Storing,

What do the measurements speak for?

The evil, evil Deep State?

-- Tom
73


   The JFK Autopsy Back Photo speaks for itself.   
74
Where does Michael Griffith work?

Dear Bill,

It's amazing just how devious those sons of guns at the KGB I mean the CIA are!

-- Tom

PS My bad. As I'm sure you would agree, the KGB* is a world-class humanitarian organization compared to the evil, evil CIA!

*Today's SVR and FSB
75
why was Wilkinson's string deleted at the education forum?
76
Well, so much for Grok's "intelligence."

The fraudulent NIST report never explained the abrupt free fall demolition of WTC7.

Nor did they explain the visible explosive pulverization of the Twin Towers and liquefied steel.

Grok gets an "F" in 9/11 Science 101.

As for Michael Griffith, where does he work?
77
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Tippit Myth
« Last post by John Corbett on March 11, 2026, 08:13:41 PM »
Dear Mike,

Regarding the JFKA (the Tippit shooting included), how many evil, evil Deep State bad guys do you figure were involved, altogether, in the planning, the planting of evidence, the patsy-ing, the planting of evidence, the shooting, the planting of evidence, the getting away, the planting of evidence, the altering of all of the photos, films, and X-rays, the planting of evidence, and the all-important (and evidently continuing!!!) cover up?

Oodles and gobs, or just a few?

-- Tom

How about less than one.
78
"Stupidity"? There was nothing along the lines of "stupidity" with the WR written description of the JFK "BACK" wound being changed to the "base of the neck".

Dear Sonderführer Storing,

Do you think the measurements written down by Humes or Boswell (I can never remember which one) regarding the distances between the entrance wound in JFK's lower neck and the lower tip of his mastoid process and the tip of his shoulder blade were grossly inaccurate?

If so, do you think some evil, evil Deep State bad guy made them do that?

-- Tom
79

    Regarding the unidentified eyewitnesses inside Dealey Plaza, are you referring to Gordon Arnold?
    With respect to your "binary" issue, Witt testified that he was moving down the knoll, directly toward Elm St, while trying to open his umbrella when the JFK Limo approached/passed by him. This is in direct conflict with ALL of the JFK Assassination Images showing the JFK Limo approaching the Umbrella Man standing stock still near the Stemmons Sign. Either Witt is correct and the Images are Bogus, or the Images are good and Witt is a liar. And during this same HSCA testimony, Witt positively ID'd himself as the guy sitting on the Elm St curb next to The Cuban. I bring this up in order to physically position Witt moving directly toward Elm St. Nobody is seen moving down the Knoll in this specific area.
80
That's exactly what I believe. I have no reason to believe otherwise.

Hanlon's Razor
Hanlon's Razor, also known as Occam's Razor, is a philosophical razor that suggests a way of eliminating unlikely explanations for human behavior. It is a heuristic tool that encourages people to consider alternative explanations for actions rather than to assume an intent to harm. The adage states: "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."

This maxim is especially true when we are talking about government operations. I say this as a retired government employee.

The JFK assassination was naturally a very stressful event for all. It is hardly surprising that in such a circumstance, fallible human beings would be more prone to making errors. Errors in judgement, errors of omission, etc. Everyone involved would have better served had they followed the same established and proven procedures that would be used in any other murder investigation. Instead, some people chose to deviate from the norm with less than satisfactory results. The selection of the autopsy team is a glaring example of that.

   "Stupidity"? There was nothing along the lines of "stupidity" with the WR written description of the JFK "BACK" wound being changed to the "base of the neck". This written change was made knowing that the JFK Autopsy Photos were sealed. And the guy making this change then eventually gets appointed VP and politically ascends to POTUS? With respect to your claim of "stupidity" being responsible for everything, there does come a straw that breaks the camel's back.
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10