What you call my scenario is the WCR and it remains the only complete scenario ever presented. You've never presented one nor has any other CT. All you can do is present lame excuses for not accepting any of the evidence that clearly indicates Oswald was the assassin. The WCR wins by default.

Only in your poorly educated mind. For starters, the WC's scenario is hardly "complete." Good grief, the HSCA blew that myth out of the water.

Second, you're in no position to be saying whether a plausible alternative scenario has been presented (in fact, several such scenarios have been presented), because you've done so little reading on the JFK case that you don't even know what the WC said about key issues, nor do you know what leading WC defenders have said on key issues, much less what WC critics have documented.

Those same FBI interview statements as Robin shows here were what was shown to Carolyn Arnold who, upon seeing what FBI quoted her as saying, emphatically rejected it and told Earl Golz that FBI had altered her statement...We have to assume that if Sarah Stanton was speaking up at family gatherings, and repeating her witnessing of Oswald on the 2nd Floor staircase landing, that FBI committed another alteration in the case of Stanton's statement just like they did with Carolyn Arnold and many other witnesses...Sarah Stanton was very lucky to be alive considering what other witnesses were murdered for...No one ever went to Stanton and showed her her FBI statement like Golz did with Carolyn Arnold...But you can be sure that what drove Stanton to repeat her witnessing at family gatherings was her consternation over her witnessing never surfacing in coverage of the assassination...

If one were to accurately translate what Stanton said in this statement (instead of the distorted garbage Bart Kamp has flooded the internet with) you can see she told FBI in this statement that she was up behind Lovelady in the Prayer Man position...She confirmed this when she said she could not see the limousine at the time of the shots...If you look at Darnell, Prayer Man cannot see the limo at the time of the shots due to the west wall of the portal...The 6th Floor Museum 1st generation copy finally confirmed this by showing Stanton's dress neckline on Prayer Man...In 2016 Chris Davidson's enhancement of the clear Wiegman frame also proved Prayer Man was Stanton...Davidson admitted he was friends with the Prayer Man people so he never supported his discovery...Stanton is faintly seen up behind Lovelady in Hughes...No effort was ever made to obtain and scan Hughes because the Prayer Man people knew what they would find...

Discussion of this evidence squarely belongs on The Education Forum according to its merit...It is being kept off the forum by a group of insiders who dominate the forum and control the administrator, moderators, and members...These people disallow discussion of the evidence that disproves Prayer Man by means of banning and defamation of those who can prove it - as well as false claims of rules violations...My discovery of Stanton's witnessing of Oswald waiting for Mrs Reid to clear out the Lunch Room is one of the most important discoveries in conspiracy research yet it is purposely kept from The Education Forum where it belongs without accountability by those who are censoring it...

Sarah Stanton.

The clique protects Prayer Man and corrupts JFK research...

Even Morley is afraid to elaborate...

Not one word about obtaining and scanning the 6th Floor Museum 1st generation copy...Instead we get Larry Schnapf pandering to the Prayer Man people and explaining why the Task Force is never going to try to get the 6th Floor copy...That is a direct serving of the Prayer Man groups' (Greg Parker) corruption of JFK research...The reason there is no discussion of the 6th Floor Museum Jones copy showing Sarah Stanton's dress neckline is because the hijacking clique on The Education Forum is completely aware that it proves Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...The Luna Task Force could obtain the 6th Floor Museum 1st generation copy any time it desired only the Prayer Man people have reached their slimy octopus arm of corruption all they way to Congress via DiEugenio...Ask Andrew Iler how he defines that via the site rules...It isn't what you know it is who you know via the buddy buddy system that fraudulent forum operates under...

How honest is it for Mr Unger to bring the film that finally settled the Prayer Man issue to The Education Forum and not discuss or show its most important aspect?...

The reason there is no participation in Robin's thread over there on the EF is because they know it shows Stanton's dress neckline and they are intentionally de-populating the subject in order to avoid the Prayer Man head-hunters...

Your entire article is nothing more than a litany of excuses for dismissing all that damning evidence against Oswald. If your excuses carried any weight, you should be able to put together a plausible alternative narrative that takes into account all that evidence including your pathetic excuses. We both know that no such plausible alternative narrative is possible or somebody would have come up with one by now. It's been almost 63 years since the assassination and no one has come close to developing a scenario that explains the entire body of evidence. CTs are in the business of explaining away the evidence as your article demonstrates.

Uh-huh. You bet. IOW, your scenario has been debunked by physical evidence, by scientific evidence, by rifle tests, by reenactments, and by numerous released documents, but it must still be true because no one has presented an alternative scenario that you are willing to accept. That's what you're saying.

How about if you write an article that responds to the points and evidence presented in my article? Hey? Oh, but in order to do that, you'd have to actually read my article.