Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10
71
I can't dumb it down anymore.
Read Latona's testimony and if you have any questions, ask him!
https://www.jfk-assassination.net/russ/testimony/latona.htm

JohnM

I didn't think you could:

In 1963, determining the exact age or "freshness" of a latent fingerprint was not scientifically possible, as methods were limited to identifying WHO left the print rather than WHEN. Forensic techniques focused on visual enhancement, not chemical analysis of age.
72
Explain how that works

I can't dumb it down anymore.
Read Latona's testimony and if you have any questions, ask him!
https://www.jfk-assassination.net/russ/testimony/latona.htm

JohnM
73
:D
Didn't you read my post? ;D
Latona did it practically using regular readings over a twenty four hour period. ;D :D

JohnM

Explain how that works
74
By all means, feel free to demonstrate how a print was dated in 1963.
 :D Good luck with that

 :D
Didn't you read my post? ;D
Latona did it practically using regular readings over a twenty four hour period. ;D :D

JohnM
75
AI?
Hilarious.
Garbage in Garbage out.

JohnM

By all means, feel free to demonstrate how a print was dated in 1963.
 :D Good luck with that
76
AI?
Hilarious.
Garbage in Garbage out.

JohnM

Garbage in Garbage out.

If there is one person who knows just about everything about that, it's you.

Everything you post shows it
77
Steve Barber was always one of my favourites and when he became a member and started pleasantly interacting with me, was the icing on the cake!
This video was so good, the production values were excellent.
It must have taken a lot of time to add all the little snippets like magazine articles, photos, video clips and etc. and the relevant actual dictabelt recordings so we can hear for ourselves what Steve heard and deciphered was a neat touch.

JohnM
78
AI Overview
In 1963, determining the exact age or "freshness" of a latent fingerprint was not scientifically possible, as methods were limited to identifying WHO left the print rather than WHEN. Forensic techniques focused on visual enhancement, not chemical analysis of age.

He worked there. He would be expected to touch anything in the building.

AI?
Hilarious.
Garbage in Garbage out.

JohnM
79
Just how dishonest can you be. That is a jpg made by Tony Fratini and he was talking about the 20 inch bag... not the 38 inch bag.

the red stripe shows the size of a 38 inch bag. You've shot yourself in the foot, yet again!  :D

My dear boy, he wasn't carrying an Elephant gun!

I added a similar sized Oswald rifle bag and know what I did, you lose again!
Next time think before you blindly rush in because correcting your mistakes is becoming a full time job!



JohnM
80
AI Overview
In 1963, determining the exact age or "freshness" of a latent fingerprint was not scientifically possible, as methods were limited to identifying WHO left the print rather than WHEN. Forensic techniques focused on visual enhancement, not chemical analysis of age.

He worked there. He would be expected to touch anything in the building.

It's the only evidence assumptions they have. Poor souls
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10