Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10
71
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: The First Shot
« Last post by Andrew Mason on August 30, 2026, 09:15:55 PM »
Quote from: Dan O'meara on August 30, 2026, 03:23:51 PM
Come on Andrew, let's not go through all this yet again.


The location of the hole in the clothing such as a jacket that is free to move around can be misleading. You also have the jacket on a hanger. Here it is on the body:

 
Quote
Just be honest.
Look at the image of JBC's jacket above and how low down the bullet hole is.
Remember the bullet exits on a downward trajectory, so his wrist would have to be even lower than the bullet hole.
Quote
Now look at how high up JBC is holding his wrist in z271.

All you need to do is be honest.
The bullet struck just above the end of the jacket cuff and struck the middle of the french cuff:



To suggest that one has to be dishonest to argue that JBC was struck on the second shot at z271 is to demonstrate a lack of understanding of all the evidence.
72
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: The First Shot
« Last post by Andrew Mason on August 30, 2026, 08:18:01 PM »
Quote from: John Corbett on August 30, 2026, 03:14:58 PM
How the hell does a bullet fired from behind the limo exit from the right nipple during that sequence? It's preposterous
I didn’t make up the notion the JBC was turned sideways when the second shot sounded. Nellie and Gayle Newman observed it and JBC’s three doctors agreed that his chest was nearly parallel to the direction of the bullet:
73
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Yet Another Bullet That the Lone-Gunman Theory Cannot Explain
« Last post by Michael Capasse on August 30, 2026, 07:42:20 PM »
Quote from: John Corbett on August 30, 2026, 07:38:55 PM
I've looked at a number of online dictionary definitions of "missile", some of which would apply to a bullet fragment and others which would not. It really isn't important. It is what the person who used the term "missile" meant by it. If that person considered a fragment to be a missile, then it is a missile.

Does nothing to clarify the receipt dated 11/22/63
lame with a bit of mumbo-jumbo on the side

74
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Yet Another Bullet That the Lone-Gunman Theory Cannot Explain
« Last post by John Corbett on August 30, 2026, 07:38:55 PM »
Quote from: Michael Capasse on August 30, 2026, 07:29:31 PM
Well then, it should be easy to find clarification in the official documents for such a major discrepancy.
Missile is a bullet, I'm not aware of any reference of other fragments found in this case called "missiles".
Even if "removed" Humes made no further reference to it, The document was hidden until 1972.

Find an official reference that missile means fragment would clarify it as not just another lame excuse

I've looked at a number of online dictionary definitions of "missile", some of which would apply to a bullet fragment and others which would not. It really isn't important. It is what the person who used the term "missile" meant by it. If that person considered a fragment to be a missile, then it is a missile.
75
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: EF-JFKA... Better, but Still Some P.U.
« Last post by John Corbett on August 30, 2026, 07:30:03 PM »
Quote from: Brian Doyle on August 30, 2026, 06:48:20 PM
You are offering yourself and your shallow nay-saying as not only on parr with Armstrong but better...

I think any review or your material vs Armstrong's sleuthing shows that for what it is...

Just Armstrong's Westbrook material is near genius work and cracks the case...

Do you believe Westbrook when he says he walked from the Police Station to the Depository?

The case was "cracked" 12 hours after Oswald killed JFK. That's when the DPD formally charged him with JFK's murder. They had already charged him with killing Tippit a few hours earlier.

Everything that has been learned since and all the advances in the forensic sciences has only served to make that case stronger. There is no rational explanation of the JFKA that doesn't have Oswald as the man who fired the shots at JFK and who later killed Tippit.
76
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Yet Another Bullet That the Lone-Gunman Theory Cannot Explain
« Last post by Michael Capasse on August 30, 2026, 07:29:31 PM »
Quote from: Mitch Todd on August 30, 2026, 06:50:36 PM
The "major discrepancy" exists only in your own head and nowhere else. "Missile" has a range of meanings, and the fragments exchanged for the receipt falls within that. For that matter, Sibert and O'Neil both talk about the fragments and the receipt exchanged therefore in their ARRB depositions.

Well then, it should be easy to find clarification in the official documents for such a major discrepancy.
Missile is a bullet, I'm not aware of any reference of other fragments found in this case called "missiles".
Even if "removed" Humes made no further reference to it, The document was hidden until 1972.

Find an official reference that missile means fragment would clarify it as not just another lame excuse
77
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: EF-JFKA... Better, but Still Some P.U.
« Last post by Duncan MacRae on August 30, 2026, 06:53:44 PM »
Quote from: Brian Doyle on August 30, 2026, 03:11:25 PM
Armstrong is one of the best in the business...He deserves better and his evidence stands up...

78
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Yet Another Bullet That the Lone-Gunman Theory Cannot Explain
« Last post by Mitch Todd on August 30, 2026, 06:50:36 PM »
Quote from: Michael Capasse on August 29, 2026, 04:29:16 PM
Well then, it should be easy to find clarification in the official documents for such a major discrepancy.
Missile is a bullet, I'm not aware of any reference of other fragments found in this case called "missiles".
Even if "removed" Humes made no further reference to it, The document was hidden until 1972.

Find an official reference that missile means fragment would clarify it as not just another lame excuse 
The "major discrepancy" exists only in your own head and nowhere else. "Missile" has a range of meanings, and the fragments exchanged for the receipt falls within that. For that matter, Sibert and O'Neil both talk about the fragments and the receipt exchanged therefore in their ARRB depositions.
79
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / EF-JFKA... Better, but Still Some P.U.
« Last post by Brian Doyle on August 30, 2026, 06:48:20 PM »

You are offering yourself and your shallow nay-saying as not only on parr with Armstrong but better...

I think any review or your material vs Armstrong's sleuthing shows that for what it is...

Just Armstrong's Westbrook material is near genius work and cracks the case...

Do you believe Westbrook when he says he walked from the Police Station to the Depository?
80
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: EF-JFKA... Better, but Still Some P.U.
« Last post by Tommy Shanks on August 30, 2026, 06:35:37 PM »
Quote from: Brian Doyle on August 30, 2026, 03:11:25 PM
Armstrong is one of the best in the business...He deserves better and his evidence stands up...

You really have to be kidding. His interpretations of the evidence make no sense and some of them are so silly as to almost be a joke. Not sure why you don't realize this...
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10