I posted this on "When Was JBC Hit?".
It demonstrates what nonsense the premise of this thread is.
The observation, that JBC doesn't look injured at z248, is utter nonsense;

"I created this GiF to highlight JBC's reaction. I used z223 and z240 which represents a time gap of 1 second. A single second. Look at the difference between the two images and consider there is a single second between them:"

Oh my goodness. You are worse than a teenager. Do you really think readers won't see through this silly, dishonest dodge?

I've stated several times now that the FPP did not touch the issue of missing frontal bone in the text of their report, but that they (1) produced several wound diagrams that show no missing frontal bone, (2) ignored McDonnel's and Angel's analyses of the skull x-rays regarding missing frontal bone, (3) ignored Angel's placement of the triangular fragment in the frontal bone, and (4) ludicrously placed the triangular fragment in the parietal bone in order to avoid having to admit that substantial frontal bone was missing.

And your teenage response is to cry "but they didn't say in their text that there was no missing frontal bone!" Producing bogus, misleading wound diagrams showing no missing frontal bone is every bit as much of an act of making a false claim as falsely saying in text that there was no missing frontal bone. Producing misleading diagrams is a form of misleading communication, especially if you purposely avoided saying that the diagrams are misleading.

If you bought a house remotely based on photos that a realtor sent you and then you found out that the photos had been photoshopped to conceal damage to the house, imagine what you would think if you confronted that realtor and they said, "Oh, hey, I never said there was no damage to the house!" Yeah, I'm sure you'd be just fine and dandy with that nonsense, right?

I would just again note that you still have not acknowledged your undeniable blunder of claiming that the FPP identified one of the skull fragments as frontal bone. There were only four skull fragments, and the FPP said in writing that they constituted the entire exit wound. They did not identify any of the fragments as frontal bone, even though the triangular fragment was "clearly frontal bone," as Dr. Angel told them and as Dr. Mantik, Dr. Chesser, and others have confirmed.

Finally, if you want to read about the FPP's conflicts with Angel and McDonnel over missing frontal bone and the placement of the triangular fragment and the Harper fragment, I again suggest that you break down and read John Hunt's famous article on the subject. Here's the link again, for your convenience:

https://www.history-matters.com/essays/jfkmed/ADemonstrableImpossibility/ADemonstrableImpossibility.htm

Pretty dadgum extreme and biased. YEE-HAA!

That's because I was quoting a post from 2018. Here ya go: Walden by Henry David Thoreau. Happy now?

Not everyone, sweetie, but indeed some we could name.  I'm sure Greg is an intelligent and hardworking guy who is kind to stray dogs, but in my opinion his ideas on virtually every issue are indeed lunatic fringe stuff. YMMV, and I'll bet it does.

The fact is, as I have pointed out repeatedly, there is now a VAST body of psychological and sociological literature concerning the conspiracy-prone mindset. Your continued umbrage might seem to many as though you were protesting just a wee bit too much.

Familiarity with this literature would be exceedingly helpful to a newbie in attempting to separate the wheat (e.g., Larry Hancock) from the chaff (i.e., you) in the CT literature.

I will concede: you are as fair and balanced as FOX News. 

What you fail to grasp is that I am talking about methodology for a newbie. My suggestion would be for a newbie, BEFORE he (or she) dives into substantive JFKA materials, to (1) familiarize himself with the literature concerning the conspiracy-prone mindset, and (2) thoroughly acquaint himself with Oswald the actual man, not the fictional Most Interesting Man Who Ever Lived of much CT literature or the cardboard cutout who is plugged into many conspiracy theories only because "we gotta do something with him."