Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10
71
The distances being travelled were not very far, you make out like they were trying to climb Everest!

By taking the following path from Haywood's bike to the first time he's seen in Darnell, is at the most about 60-70 yards.



And the distance for Walthers to basically walk down and cross the road was about the same. If the time stamp was less than 12:37 then we might have trouble but every established event happened in chronological order and with enough time between to account for travelling!



Mr. WALTHERS. And at that time I heard the shots as well as everybody else, but as we got over this fence, and a lot of officers and people were just rummaging through the train yards back in this parking area.
Mr. LIEBELER. In the parking area down there? West of the Texas School Book Depository Building between the Texas School Book Depository and the railroad tracks?
Mr. WALTHERS. Yes; and the discussion came up among several of the officers, "Were there any shots fired?" And I said, "Well, they sounded like rifle shots to me." At the time no one knew---in our crowd they were sure the shots had been fired though because of the reports---we heard the noise, and I left then and went back up here and came back onto the street.
Mr. LIEBELER. Up on Elm Street?
Mr. WALTHERS. And went over on this grassy area right in here [indicating].
Mr. LIEBELER. Between Elm Street and Main Street?
Mr. WALTHERS. Between Elm and Main and starting to looking at the grass to see if some shots had been fired and some of them might have chugged into this turf here and it would give an indication if some had really been, if they were really shots and not just blanks or something, and a man, and I couldn't tell you his name if my life depended on it---he had a car parked right here in Main Street---in the Main Street lane headed east, just under this underpass.


And as seen everyone was walking with some pace, it wasn't a Mother's meeting, they all were trying to find something, anything! But alas there was nothing to be found because all the action happened on the 6th floor of the TSBD and this is supported by ALL the evidence from the ballistic evidence through to the medical evidence.



JohnM

   Based on the path we see above, why would Officer Haygood walk to the FAR SIDE of the Elm St Extension, and then have to cut back across it if he intended to return to his motorcycle? This Bogus Motorcycle Cop was on the Far Side of the Elm St Extension in order to AVOID DPD Officer Harkness. This Impostor wanted absolutely nothing to do with Officer Harkness. He even avoided making eye contact with Harkness as he slipped past him. And what is dead ahead of this Bogus Motorcycle Cop? The TSBD, the "wide open" Huge Gates, and the intended "getaway" car.   
72
RS:  I am talking about the dirt road portion of the Elm St Extension.

So why did you bring up the limo turn and traffic signal in the Wegman film?

there are NO BOLLARDS between Officer Harkness and this alleged motorcycle cop.

Yes there are! Not only can you see many of them in the Darnell film, others are made obvious when the motorcycle cop walks behind them.

Here, bollards are outlined in red. Note that one is in Harkness' shadow:


Here, "B" marks where the line of bollards is. You can see that two of them are silhouetted by the MC as he walks behind them:


Here he is a half step later:


                                                                           THAT AIN'T HAYGOOD!

                                                                          (1) NO Motorcycle Glove

                                                                          (2) NO Sunglasses

                                                                          (3) NO Motorcycle
73
LP-

Verily, there was a lack up of investigative follow-up on many credible witnesses who described the last two shots as nearly "simultaneous," such Dallas Sheriff Seymour Weitzman, or Secret Service agent Kellerman, and several others.

Same, why did no one ever ask Gov JBC, "What do you mean, you were shot at by 'automatic' weapons? That is entirely inconsistent with what we theorize what happened, that a lone gunsel with a single-shot-per-bolt-action rifle perped the JFKA."

I suspect JBC meant that the assassin(s) were armed with an automatic rifle, but toggled to one shot per trigger squeeze mode. But no one at either the WC or HSCA clarified that. By all accounts, JBC was a smart guy, head screwed on tight. Seems odd JBC would use the expression "automatic" rifle. Connally served in WWII on the flight deck of aircraft carriers, so I assume he had some sort of working knowledge of firearms. JBC is reported to have been an avid sport game hunter as well.

It requires a large suspension of disbelief to accept the LNT-SBT with a single-shot-per-bolt-action rifle narrative.

   This is exactly why the LN's Now claim 10+ seconds for the 3 shots to be fired. They know that WW 2 Bolt Action rifle just don't cut it. There's also the WC Testimony of ASAIC Kellerman claiming a "Flurry" of shells came into the car. That carcano rifle is incapable of sending a "flurry" of shells into the JFK Limo.
74
LP-

Verily, there was a lack up of investigative follow-up on many credible witnesses who described the last two shots as nearly "simultaneous," such Dallas Sheriff Seymour Weitzman, or Secret Service agent Kellerman, and several others.

Same, why did no one ever ask Gov JBC, "What do you mean, you were shot at by 'automatic' weapons? That is entirely inconsistent with what we theorize what happened, that a lone gunsel with a single-shot-per-bolt-action rifle perped the JFKA."

I suspect JBC meant that the assassin(s) were armed with an automatic rifle, but toggled to one shot per trigger squeeze mode. But no one at either the WC or HSCA clarified that. By all accounts, JBC was a smart guy, head screwed on tight. Seems odd JBC would use the expression "automatic" rifle. Connally served in WWII on the flight deck of aircraft carriers, so I assume he had some sort of working knowledge of firearms. JBC is reported to have been an avid sport game hunter as well.

It requires a large suspension of disbelief to accept the LNT-SBT with a single-shot-per-bolt-action rifle narrative.


75
Yes, almost every aspect of the JFKA seems to have come from the pen of some crazed whodunnit author who was cackling "They'll NEVER figure this out!" Literally nothing is neat and clean. It just isn't.

A classic disinformation strategy; keep them guessing.....

But why? When this is a cut and dried killing?

Even the PEOPLE. Oswald couldn't just be an everyday angry punk. Ruth Paine couldn't just be an ordinary housewife. Jack Ruby couldn't just be an ordinary businessman. And right up and down the line - almost EVERYBODY is quirky and invites speculation. And the weird connections are seemingly endless.

I have mentioned before my friend who is internationally known in UFO circles and who thinks we live in a virtual reality. He believes that certain events are "programmed" and have a significance far beyond the event itself. He has no interest at all in the JFKA, but it is one of those events he thinks has a deeper significance. Pretty far out, but sometimes it almost seems to make sense: the JFKA actually is a cosmically programmed whodunnit!
76
I was always kind of a free-floating CTer (i.e., no specific theory) because all I read was gee-whiz CT literature for decades. With deeper - much deeper - study, I gravitated to the LN position. After extensive study of Oswald, I will admit that I have a certain degree of sympathy or empathy for him; I really don't see him at all the way most LNers seem to do - more the "goofy mixed-up kid from a badly broken home" than the "murderous sociopath." I cannot explain his role in the JFKA in a way that is entirely satisfactory to me, based on all I know about him (which I think is about as much as can be known). It almost seems that there HAS to be more to the story than the LN narrative provides; the LN narrative could well be correct in its bottom-line conclusion, but my sense is that "something is missing." Many hardcore LNers seem to me to try too hard to insist there are no mysteries and nothing to talk about. As far as CT theories go, the one that makes by far the most sense to me is the Mafia. Not the Mafia++++, but just the Mafia or even a single Mafioso like Marcello. The Mafia had an incredibly strong, multi-faceted motive, the JFKA would have been little more than business as usual for them, and Oswald would have been an absolutely perfect patsy. A tight, tightly controlled, no-cover-up-necessary JFKA. Connecting Oswald and the Mafia is, however, a challenge. John Orr's Mafia theory strikes me as weak in this respect.
77
Yes, almost every aspect of the JFKA seems to have come from the pen of some crazed whodunnit author who was cackling "They'll NEVER figure this out!" Literally nothing is neat and clean. It just isn't.

Up to the Tippit killing, everything has gone unbelievably smoothly for Oswald. He survives the Baker encounter - near miracle. He exits the TSBD and walks away - near miracle. He gets to Beckley without incident and pockets his revolver - perfect. AND THEN HE STARTS WALKING DOWN THE SIDEWALK in full view of the world (perhaps even pausing to pee into the bushes!) - WHY? And then he encounters Tippit in full view of umpteen witnesses and PROCEEDS TO BLOW HIM AWAY, including a close-up kill shot to the head, thereby destroying in an instant any hope of a clean escape - WHY? Why did Oswald the previously cool cucumber morph so quickly into Oswald the crazed murderer? And, then, for whatever they are worth, we have the accounts of Tippit's morning activities that suggest he was up to "something" before the Oswald encounter. Anyone is certainly entitled to conclude "I'm 100% confident the LN narrative is fundamentally correct" - but the mysteries don't just go away. Hence my sleep-inducing exercise of trying to picture exactly, in detail, what the key players were doing and why.

"OK, Oswald sneaks into the Paine garage before 9 AM and wraps the rifle ... Ruth finds the light on at 9 ... Oswald goes back into the garage at 4 AM ... no, wait, that won't work because ..."



Yes, almost every aspect of the JFKA seems to have come from the pen of some crazed whodunnit author who was cackling "They'll NEVER figure this out!" Literally nothing is neat and clean. It just isn't.

A classic disinformation strategy; keep them guessing.....

But why? When this is a cut and dried killing?

78
If Tippit had seen that Oswald had a revolver, he IMO wouldn't have gotten out of his car without first having taken his revolver out of it's holster.

The entire encounter is strange.

Oswald had no obvious reason for being at a suburban area like 10th street if he was on the run after killing Kennedy. Unless of course (and here comes the tin foil hat) in case he was told to go there, if whatever he was involved in went wrong. I somehow find that highly speculative possibility more plausible than the theory that a killer on the run takes a taxi (after offering one to a lady) to his rooming house, getting his revolver and then stand at the bus stop in front of the building, before deciding that he would go, of all places, to 10th street instead of walking to Jefferson and get on the first bus.

On the other hand, Tippit had no obvious reason to stop a civilian walking on the sidewalk, but he nevertheless initiated contact (without telling the operator) by calling Oswald to the side of the car to have a conversation with him. They didn't talk long, so what would have caused the massive escalation?

And if we assume that Oswald was the assassin on the run, why would he be so stupid to draw instant attention to himself and his location by killing a cop in front of witnesses? It seems to me this can't be explained by simply claiming he just panicked.

Does this mean Oswald didn't kill Tippit? No, of course not. It just means that none of it makes a great deal of sense, if you really think about it.

Yes, almost every aspect of the JFKA seems to have come from the pen of some crazed whodunnit author who was cackling "They'll NEVER figure this out!" Literally nothing is neat and clean. It just isn't.

Up to the Tippit killing, everything has gone unbelievably smoothly for Oswald. He survives the Baker encounter - near miracle. He exits the TSBD and walks away - near miracle. He gets to Beckley without incident and pockets his revolver - perfect. AND THEN HE STARTS WALKING DOWN THE SIDEWALK in full view of the world (perhaps even pausing to pee into the bushes!) - WHY? And then he encounters Tippit in full view of umpteen witnesses and PROCEEDS TO BLOW HIM AWAY, including a close-up kill shot to the head, thereby destroying in an instant any hope of a clean escape - WHY? Why did Oswald the previously cool cucumber morph so quickly into Oswald the crazed murderer? And, then, for whatever they are worth, we have the accounts of Tippit's morning activities that suggest he was up to "something" before the Oswald encounter. Anyone is certainly entitled to conclude "I'm 100% confident the LN narrative is fundamentally correct" - but the mysteries don't just go away. Hence my sleep-inducing exercise of trying to picture exactly, in detail, what the key players were doing and why.

"OK, Oswald sneaks into the Paine garage before 9 AM and wraps the rifle ... Ruth finds the light on at 9 ... Oswald goes back into the garage at 4 AM ... no, wait, that won't work because ..."

79
Isn't it strange that we have these hearsay accounts of what Bowers supposedly said, but never told the WC about it when he had the chance.

Mr. BALL - I believe you have talked this over with me before your deposition was taken, haven't we?
Mr. BOWERS - Yes.
Mr. BALL - Is there anything that you told me that I haven't asked you about that you think of?
Mr. BOWERS - Nothing that I can recall.
Mr. BALL - You have told me all that you know about this, haven't you?
Mr. BOWERS - Yes; I believe that I have related everything which I have told the city police, and also told to the FBI.
Mr. BALL - And everything you told me before we started taking the deposition?
Mr. BOWERS - To my knowledge I can remember nothing else.

80
In a fit of near-terminal boredom, I reviewed a number of the many "Bowers" posts at the Ed Forum.

1. The entire transcript of Lane's interview with Bowers is available for a small fee from the Wisconsin Historical Society. Bowers specifically told Lane that he saw no accomplices on his side of the fence. Lane conveniently omitted this.

2. Ed Forum members expressed surprising skepticism about Bowers' credibility. Not that he was lying, but that he was conflating what he had actually seen and what he had later heard. One pretty careful analysis of what he could actually see from his tower makes clear that he could not have seen some of what he described (nothing about the cars, which he clearly could have seen).

3. There was, of course, speculation that Bowers himself was part of the conspiracy - a "lookout" of some sort.

4. Steve Thomas identified that the two cars with black-on-white out of state plates and Goldwater stickers had to be from Virginia. Langley, the CIA headquarters, is in Virginia. Case closed.

5. The following compilation was attributed to Matt Douthit:

* Researcher David Murph interviewed Reverend Wilfred Bailey, Bowers’s minister. "Lee did discuss that day with me. He said he saw movement behind the fence. He believed something was going on, but he never got more specific than that. He did not share with me any more than he shared with the Warren Commission."

* New Orleans district attorney Jim Garrison was approached by James R. Sterling, a friend and fellow employee of Bowers. Sterling said Bowers “...observed two men running from behind the fence. They ran up to a car parked behind the Pergola, opened the trunk and placed something in it and then closed the trunk. The two men then drove the car away in somewhat of a peculiar method.”

* Another friend of Bowers, Walter Rischel, came forward and revealed to reporter Morey Terry: “He said he saw a car pull up. Two men got out of the car, and they were carrying what appeared to be rifles. He said that one gunman apparently positioned himself either on their car or on a car. The other one I don’t recall where he said he was. He said he saw both men fire shots. He could tell by the puffs of smoke that it came from the rifles.” Terry: “You’re saying that Lee Bowers told you that he saw both men fire?” Rischel: “Yes, he did.”

* In addition, legendary Texas journalist Penn Jones Jr. said he also heard the complete Bowers story: “He said he saw gunmen firing at the President from their hidden position. He didn’t see all of them, but he saw two of them that were firing. At the President.”

* And finally, there is Olan Degaugh, Bowers’s boss. Researcher Debra Conway wrote: “I interviewed the supervisor for the railroad yard and Bowers’ boss's superior. He told us that Bowers told him and his direct boss that he did see the two men BEHIND THE FENCE and he thought at least one of them was shooting. He said he didn't go further with it because he was afraid. He didn't want his life threatened or ruined being the main witness against Lee Oswald being the lone shooter.” From Conway’s notes: “Degaugh felt Bowers never told the authorities about the men, the car, or what he saw these men doing immediately after the shooting because he did not want to be more involved in the assassination controversy.” A few years later, Conway re-interviewed Degaugh. “Degaugh said that Bowers told him that he saw someone running away. This person put something inside a car, get into the car and drive away. Degaugh said that Bowers told him it looked like a rifle.”

And on it goes.
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10