Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10
71
It has never been established which shot caused the injury to Tague.
The only evidence we have is that he was struck on the second shot.  The only evidence we have of an impact occurring in the car is on the second shot.  There is no evidence that Tague or anything in the car was struck on the third shot.  In fact we have evidence that the third shot was after Tague was struck.  I will admit it is not overwhelming evidence but it is all we have.

Quote
What you really mean is your interpretation of that evidence.
No. It is simply taking the evidence at face value. No interpretation at all.

Quote
Hickey was out of the frame when the second shot struck about Z222 so we don't know for sure which way he was facing. The last time we can see him prior to that shot was Z207 and he is clearly facing forward.Oh, goody. Here we go with your infatuation with witnesses again. No wonder you can't figure this thing out.
You have to read what Hickey wrote in his statement (18 H 762).  There was no turn to the rear and then a turn forward between the second and third shots. He observed what happened to JFK while looking at him when the last two rapid shots sounded:

"He was slumped forward and to his left, and was straightening up to an almost erect sitting position as I turned and looked.  At the moment he was almost sitting erect I heard two reports which I thought were shots and that appeared to me completely different in sound than the first report and were in such rapid succession that there seemed to be practically no time element between them. It looked to me as if the President was struck in the right upper rear of his head. The first shot of the second two seemed as if it missed because the hair on the right side of his head flew forward and there didn't seem to be any impact against his head. The last shot seemed to hit his head and cause a noise at the point of impact which made him fall forward and to his left again."


72
Well, at least you tried. Finally.
I have published those many times before.

Quote
You don't have JBC's shoulders turned even close to how they were at Z271. The middle sketch approximates Zapruder's perspective but in reality, Zapruder was still slightly ahead of the limo at Z271. From Zapruder's position, JBC's shoulders were rotated clockwise away from Zapruder. You have his shoulders rotated counterclockwise from square to Zapruder. You have his head rotated more than his shoulders were turned.
As I have explained, I do not have a model that duplicates a torso twist.  I am trying to get the position of his torso at the level of his fifth rib correct, so the shoulders are not turned as much as they are in z271.  But the fifth rib is about right.  You can see this yourself if you took the time to twist your torso from a forward seating position so you could see behind you.

Here is JBC at z254-255 from the front-left (Altgens No. 6):


Here is JBC as seen in the Zfilm at z254 for comparison:



And here is what he looks like in z268:



Now if you think the entry wound in his right armpit is not visible to a shooter in the SN (Oswald) you will have to explain what is blocking it. 

Keep in mind that the angle to the SN is very small at this point.  The shot from the SN looks like this:

[/quote]
73
Have you listened to his taped conversations with LBJ? Hoover was clueless."They" were the DPD. They did turn over the investigation to the FBI but that doesn't mean it made it up the ladder to Hoover. His conversations with LBJ indicated he didn't have a grasp of some of the most basic facts.The memo was from Katzenbach to Moyers. What the hell does that have to do with the conversations between Hoover and LBJ?Neither are your opinions.

How do you go from this  BS: .... 

Quote
"By the time he wrote that, there was already enough evidence gathered that there was no doubt Oswald was the assassin and the WC would come to that conclusion."

..to some phone conversation with Hoover?
74
I've seen statements like this before, but is it really up to the individual to decide whether his or her personal sense of doubt meets the threshold of legally defined reasonable doubt?

Mark,

I think my doubts are reasonable, but unsure if they meet the legal threshold. Had I been on the jury in the Clay Shaw trial, I would have voted not guilty. I have not however read the Garrison book On the trail of the Assassins and base this verdict on the Oliver Stone movie JFK, which is entertaining but for a large part speculation and fantasy.

I had an interesting exchange with John Corbett regarding Oswald's motive, and perhaps you will be able to address the following topic, an issue which has, ever so slightly, been pushing me over to the conspiracy benches across the aisle.

Immediately after the shots and the quick departure of the Presidential limousine to Parkland Memorial Hospital a great many people, both civilians and law enforcement personnel, crossed to the north of Elm Street and entered the area behind the picket fence on the infamous grassy knoll, the parking lot and the section immediately to the west of the TSBD.

A number of these people met individuals who claimed to be agents of the US Secret Service. They showed badges. At least one of them was armed with an automatic weapon. Another (or the same) one had dirty hands and wasn't dressed as expected of a federal agent on duty. Secret Service agents, plural, were located behind the TSBD. They identified themselves as such to a DPD officer, if I remember all this correctly.

The record shows that no Secret Service agents remained at Dealey Plaza after the motorcade left. They followed the limousine to Parkland, others remained at Love Field and the Trade Mart. Any agent encountered by witnesses at the location of the assassination must therefore be an impostor. With my tinfoil hat on, I can understand that some might think that these men were in fact the assassins, or covering the retreat of them. Interesting that they were located both behind the fence and the TSBD.

What is your understanding of this episode? Am I reading too much in it?
75
For what it's worth, I did find a Carcano short rifle for sale but in 7.35mm, not the 6.5mm of Oswald's rifle.

https://royaltigerimports.com/shop/c-grade-m38-carcano-short-rifle-cal-7-35x51/

There made be other differences as well. I found two listings for 6.5mm short rifles but both indicated they had been sold. I think someone is going to have to get lucky to find the same model or rifle as Oswald's because the few that come on the market seem to get bought very quickly.
76
Here is a rough 3D Sketchup drawing of the position of the two men from the front and the side showing the location of the TSBD:



Here is the model built on the Trask map of DP:



You will have to explain why you think JBC's front is facing the SN.
Well, at least you tried. Finally.

You don't have JBC's shoulders turned even close to how they were at Z271. The middle sketch approximates Zapruder's perspective but in reality, Zapruder was still slightly ahead of the limo at Z271. From Zapruder's position, JBC's shoulders were rotated clockwise away from Zapruder. You have his shoulders rotated counterclockwise from square to Zapruder. You have his head rotated more than his shoulders were turned. The only person I ever saw able to do that was Linda Blair in The Exorcist. Unpossessed people can't do that. JBC's head turn is close enough to being accurate but you aren't showing his shoulders turned nearly enough. You would need to turn his shoulders a good 30 degrees clockwise to even be in the ballpark.

At the very least, a line through JBC's shoulders was parallel to the sides of the car. Oswald was firing from a position to the right rear of the limo. He would have no angle to shoot JBC anywhere in his back, even if we give you the benefit of the doubt on all estimates of JBC's shoulder turn. Oswald would have seen the front of JBC's torso, not the back. Even with the erroneous position of JBC's shoulders, your middle drawing shows that if the line of the bullet were to continue, it would exit from the left side of JBC's chest, not the right. You can't make this work, no matter how hard you try.
77
The FRONT of JBC's torso. That is what is exposed to Oswald. He could have hit the outside of JBC's right arm with a grazing shot. No way to enter anywhere on JBC's back. Why do you keep lying to yourself by telling yourself that could have happened.
Here is a rough 3D Sketchup drawing of the position of the two men from the front and the side showing the location of the TSBD:



Here is the model built on the Trask map of DP:



You will have to explain why you think JBC's front is facing the SN.


78
You do realized that at z271 JBC's right side is "facing" toward the TSBD/Oswald.

Yes it is which makes a shot into his back impossible at that frame.
Quote
I hope you realize that the right armpit is on the right side and that with his right arm up and in front of his chest the right armpit is exposed to a shot from the direction of the TSBD/Oswald.
The front of his right armpit is exposed to Oswald. That's not where the bullet entered. The bullet entered at the rear near his right armpit. That is turned away from Oswald.
Quote
 
The right scapula is not "facing" the TSBD/Oswald although the right edge of it is exposed to a shot from that direction. It is "facing" the grassy area between Elm and Main.  In any event, he was not hit in the scapula.
When's the last time you had your eyes checked?
Quote

The back of his armpit is turned toward the grassy area between Elm and Main.
I am not sure what you mean by the direction the back of his armpit is facing.  The back of his armpit is a particular location.

So now you want to quibble about semantics. OK. I can play that game. The back of his right armpit is EXPOSED to the grassy area between Elm and Main. It is not even close to being exposed to Oswald's gun. At Z271 JFK was leaning hard left from the position he was in at the time he was shot. That would mean any shot by Oswald directed at JBC would come over JFK's right shoulder. There's no way a bullet on that trajectory is going to enter his back near his armpit.
Quote
 
It doesn't face anywhere. What matters is whether the back of his armpit was exposed to a shot from Oswald's rifle.
It doesn't. Not even close. JBC's torso would have to rotate at least 90 degrees counter clockwise to make an entry in his back near his armpit possible.
Quote
 
Not only was the back of his armpit exposed = the entire armpit was exposed.
Both sides of that equation are ludicrous.
Quote
 
If you think it wasn't, what on earth could have blocked it?
The FRONT of JBC's torso. That is what is exposed to Oswald. He could have hit the outside of JBC's right arm with a grazing shot. No way to enter anywhere on JBC's back. Why do you keep lying to yourself by telling yourself that could have happened.
Quote
I have given you the diagram showing the exit location. 
The exit location has never been in dispute. It is how an entrance wound in the BACK of JBC's could have been made by a shot from the sniper's next at Z271. That is the impossibility.
Quote
What more do you need?  It shows the bullet coming from the TSBD/Oswald direction. It shows the direction of the shoulders. It shows the location of the entrance and exit wounds. It shows the location of the forearm in relation to the exit wound.
I don't know which diagram you are referring to. The one that looks like an abstract art painting or the earlier one in which you have JBC rotated 90 degrees counter clockwise from his actual position at Z271 and even then you needed a magical deflection of the shot to have it come out the right side of JBC's chest.

79
First you claim Hoover was clueless about the details of the assassination.
Have you listened to his taped conversations with LBJ? Hoover was clueless.
Quote

Then came the excuse "they" had enough evidence gathered by 11/25.
"They" were the DPD. They did turn over the investigation to the FBI but that doesn't mean it made it up the ladder to Hoover. His conversations with LBJ indicated he didn't have a grasp of some of the most basic facts.
Quote

You went on to claim the memo is often quoted out of context by CTs (whatever that means) - then YOU quote the memo out of context.  It is Hoover to Johnson, if you can't realize that, you're either naive or simply choose to be ignorant. You're a smart guy, so I would suggest the latter.  Nobody said anything about marching orders to a WC that doesn't exist yet.
The memo was from Katzenbach to Moyers. What the hell does that have to do with the conversations between Hoover and LBJ?
Quote

 Thumb1: ...omt, statements off the top of your head, followed up with such lame excuses to cover, are not a good litmus test for your credibility.
Neither are your opinions.
80
You tell me I have an odd concept of human anatomy and then make a statement as ridiculous as that. Here is Z271.
https://assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z271.jpg
You do realize that at z271 JBC's right side is "facing" toward the TSBD/Oswald.  I hope you realize that the right armpit is on the right side and that with his right arm up and in front of his chest the right armpit is exposed to a shot from the direction of the TSBD/Oswald.  The right scapula is not "facing" the TSBD/Oswald although the right edge of it is exposed to a shot from that direction. It is "facing" the grassy area between Elm and Main.  In any event, he was not hit in the scapula.
Quote
The back of his armpit is turned toward the grassy area between Elm and Main.
I am not sure what you mean by the direction the back of his armpit is facing.  The back of his armpit is a particular location.  It doesn't face anywhere. What matters is whether the back of his armpit was exposed to a shot from Oswald's rifle.  Not only was the back of his armpit exposed = the entire armpit was exposed.  If you think it wasn't, what on earth could have blocked it?

Quote
It would require the most magical of all magic bullets for a shot fired from the sniper's nest to enter the back of his right armpit and exit under his right nipple. Your continued refusal to even attempt to diagram such a shot is tacit admission of that fact.You're bonkers.
I have given you the diagram showing the exit location.  What more do you need?  It shows the bullet coming from the TSBD/Oswald direction. It shows the direction of the shoulders. It shows the location of the entrance and exit wounds. It shows the location of the forearm in relation to the exit wound.
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10