71
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Anna Luna's JFK Conspiracy Circus
« Last post by Matt Brooks on September 10, 2026, 06:35:23 PM »We can already work with the copies we have.
MTG's long winded posts seem to follow the adage, "If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with B:"
He seems to try to bore people into not responding to him. Often, that works.
Quote from: John Corbett on Yesterday at 05:09:08 PM
I continue to insist that no shooting can be perfectly replicated and it is an unreasonable demand that such a thing is necessary. I know of no other case in which that was done. Individual elements of a shooting can be tested to show what is possible, but to expect every aspect of any shooting to be perfectly replicated is ridiculous.
Good Luck in your being seated on any jury involving a Shooting of any kind.
Are you trying to get people to take you seriously? It's not working.
Funny that you would mention the "1st down line on the screen". That "line" is also Not, "Dead on balls accurate". Just like the game clock.
And do Not get me started on the actual "spotting" of the football. That is "putzed" up very often. Sometimes on purpose. This was made obvious with this repeatedly being done in favor of the KC Chiefs during the NFL Playoffs.
Dear danny BOY o'meara,
Unfortunately, you (or some other knucklehead) have mislabeled Secret Service agent Glen Bennett as "Hickey" in this version of the Z-201 frame.
Why in the world did you do that?
-- Tom
PS George Hickey's washed-out image can be discerned behind (and slightly lower than) Clint Hill's (McIntyre is hidden behind Hill).
They are similarly situated in Z-150:
https://assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z150.jpg


BUMP - The above is about the ORIGINAL Darnell Film and ORIGINAL Wiegman Film.
they own the films and will only give them to, say, documentary directors or people in the industry wanting to license the film.