JFK Assassination Forum

DM-Thanks for posting.

David Lifton did a lot of earnest work, and should be remembered for getting witnesses down on film or audio, back in an era when that was not so easy.

Like many, I have wondered how so many witnesses at Bethesda could have different views on the JFK wounds than those at Parkland.

Keep in mind, Humes and Boswell called in Finck to assist them, which would be odd if they were trying to cover something up.

"Finck was a Lieutenant Colonel in the U.S. Army Medical Corps and the Chief of the Wound Ballistics Pathology Branch of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP). He had extensive experience with approximately 400 cases involving missile wounds and was specifically requested to assist the two Navy pathologists, James Humes and Thornton Boswell, due to his expertise."

If there was a large gaping avulsive wound in the rear of JFK's skull...then all three, Humes, Boswell and Finck chose to lie about it for the rest of their lives, and then also fake evidence, x-rays and photos, were ginned up.

I do not have a compelling answer to this mis-match between Bethesda and Parkland.

My guess is the wound at Parkland was deep and ugly, but as described by Pat Speer--from back to front, removing skull.

Outside of an autopsy setting, one might think it was an exit wound.

That's my best guess.

Mr Shelley was correct in what he observed.

I've already explained why Shelley cannot have seen one of the black employees eating lunch on the 6th floor.
I posted this:

"This is impossible as Williams had his lunch on the 6th floor while Shelley was down on the first floor (or possibly outside), and Givens left his lunch in the domino room when he arrived for work and ate his lunch outside the building.
It is possible that Shelley saw Givens eating his lunch outside but definitely not on the 6th floor.
His racist comment might indicate he saw one of them eating their lunch on the 6th floor on some other day because they were "always eating chicken", apparently."


Please explain why you think Shelley was correct.

It's too bad you don't care about the evidence.
Don't you have any idea how you come across?
You've carved a very special niche for yourself. You're like a Tinfoil Lone Nutter.
A troll.
Impervious to Reason, Logic or Common Sense.
Do you have any idea how bizarre what you're saying is?
None of the witnesses should be listened to because you say so?
Why do you even bother posting?
Are you lonesome?

[...]