Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10
71


Hi James, excellent work as always. Here’s a crop from a very clear photo by William Allen taken on 11/22/63 during the three tramps walk through Dealey Plaza. Royell claims the car in question didn’t move at all before the Allen photo was taken. I have drawn yellow arrows pointing at the rear bumper and taillight. You can line that up with the opening for the large gates and the pole for the highway numbers sign. I believe that Allen’s position was a few feet ENE of Tina Towner’s filming position on the SW corner of Elm & Houston streets. I hope this might help clarify the position of the car.



    The 3 Tramps were marched down the Elm St Extension about 2 hrs AFTER the kill shot. What this Allen Photo makes clear is that the DPD are NOW ALL OVER this abandoned "getaway" car.(1) A DPD Motorcycle is parked behind it and preventing it from backing up, (2) there is a DPD Cop Car facing it bumper-to-bumper from the front, and (3) a uniformed DPD Officer is standing directly in front of it with a shotgun pointed skyward. ALL of this law enforcement "attention" being mere feet from the recovered carcano rifle, the sniper's nest, and the "wide open" Huge Gates. At this point in time on 11/22/63, the DPD would not be dedicating this coordinated "effort" to a 1958 run-of-the-mill auto was simply parked in a "NO PARKING At Any Time" zone. This was a now abandoned "getaway" car and the DPD knew it.
72
LP:

OK, I guess Niedernut has been removed.

How the most abrasive crackpot, an anti-Semitic crank, became a "moderator" still defines the imagination.

My guess is John Simkin, proud self-righteous Brit leftie, is part of the Islamist-leftist alliance in that nation, a sordid mating that, like anal sex, produce not new life but only turds.

So Simkin liked having Niedernut play the heavy, while Simkin opined on the deeper meaning of it all.

The EF-JFKA certainly became a sink for bilious screwballs in the past year.

They say the EF-JFKA may cease ops when funding runs out. Many participants, even dozens, are alarmed. 
73
Mark Lane approached the JFKA the same way the WC did: As a biased lawyer, arguing a case.

Mark Lane played the role of defense lawyer, and the WC (with larger resources) played the role of prosecuting attorney.

For example, the WC argued that a Western Cartridge 6.5×52mm bullet (a large slug, 1+1/4 inch long and more than a quarter-inch in diameter), after ramming through Gov. JBC's chest, then ripped through JBC's right wrist, "tumbling" as it went through.

The impact and entry by the large slug caused a compound comminuted fracture (shattering) of the distal portion of his right radius, a major forearm bone, leaving bone fragments in his wrist.

But the WC claims that JBC maintained his grip on his Stetson hat, in his right hand, after receiving that wound. The sole affirmation for this tale is an account by Nellie Connally, JBC's wife.

So, we see JBC gripping the hat at Z-272, despite the purported serious wrist wound. The WC holds that JBC was shot somewhere back around Z-222. Really?

I have reasonable doubts about the above scenario drafted by WC lawyer, Arlen Specter. Specter's job was to present the LNT-SBT narrative. So he did.

Was the Stetson hat merely near JBC's hand after he was shot? Was his badly injured wrist merely, by chance, resting atop the Stetson hat? Who knows? Did Nellie fabricate "Texas lore"? I lived in Texas i the 1970s, and the Stetson hat and being Texan are synonymous.

Lawyer Mark Lane took equal latitudes to the WC in his JFKA narratives, and Garrison in his.

A lawyer's job is to present a case, not to present a fair review of the case. In fact, I suspect Mark Lane sometimes breached the public trust, knowingly. Garrison may have believed in what he was doing.

In the JFKA, initially we had the WC---the prosecutor's case---but no defense counsel narrative, no cross-examination of witnesses, no presentation of other evidence dug up by the defense counsel.

In fact, I suspect LHO was central to the JFKA.

But the WC (and President LBJ) wanted LHO to be a LN'er. So that is what the WC found.



74
This old recreation of the Discovery Channel's "Beyond the Magic Bullet," which ended up with the bullet going Where It's Not Supposed to Go (i.e., JFK's sternum), recently received some discussion at the Ed Forum.

I also noticed that Larry Schnapf, who works closely with John Orr, says Orr's latest work shows the Mafia bullet being fired from the County Records building. You may recall that Orr sponsored the Knott Lab study of the bullet trajectories but then rejected the results (not because they confirmed the SBT, because they didn't).

Mafia! Mafia! Mafia!  :D :D :D

75
Because I am your semi-official correspondent on all things NiederNuttian, let the record reflect that NiederNut states that he resigned as a moderator effective May 31.
76
I was completely elated by the outcome of the 2016 election.

Dear John "Zombified" Corbett,

As was your and Trump's beloved KGB (today's SVR and FSB).

-- Tom
77
Thank you, Captain Obvious.
78
Since we have some new participants in the forum, I'm bumping this thread. I think objective readers will see that the evidence proves that the JFK autopsy brain photos are fraudulent and cannot be photos of JFK's brain. I think objective readers will also see that lone-gunman theorists have no rational, credible explanation for this crucial evidence.

Here is a summary of the evidence:

-- Former HSCA FPP chairman Dr. Michael Baden acknowledged to famous WC defender Vincent Bugliosi that the autopsy brain photos show "less than" 1-2 ounces of brain tissue missing. Bugliosi did not realize that Baden's disclosure was devastating evidence against the autopsy brain photos. Indeed, Bugliosi trumpeted Baden's disclosure to "refute" the eyewitnesses who said a large amount of JFK's brain was gone.

-- But those eyewitnesses were surely correct. Why? Because we know that bits of JFK's brain were blown or fell onto 16 surfaces. Significantly, several witnesses said the tissue was gray or white. About 40% of brain tissue is gray and about 60% is white. Those 16 bits of brain tissue alone certainly added up to more than 2 ounces, not to mention that it exceeded "less than 1-2 ounces."

We also know that Jackie Kennedy brought a "large chunk of brain" into the Parkland ER and handed it to Dr. Jenkins, who then handed it to a Secret Service agent. That chunk of brain surely weighed at least 2 ounces. 2 ounces of brain tissue is about the size of a golf ball.

-- The autopsy report impossibly says JFK's brain weighed 1,500 grams. The average male brain weighs about 1,350 grams. 1,500 grams equals 53 ounces. 1,350 grams equals 47 ounces.

There is no way that JFK's brain weighed anything close to 1,500, not only because so much brain matter was blown from his skull but because the autopsy skull x-rays show at least 2/3 of the right brain to be missing, and multiple optical-density (OD) measurements of the skull x-rays confirm that only about 30% of the right brain is present in the x-rays.

This is hard scientific evidence that the brain photos are fraudulent.

In addition, it should be noted that in 1992, before any OD measurements had been done on the skull x-rays, none other than Dr. James Humes, the chief JFK autopsy doctor, admitted to JAMA that "two thirds of the right cerebrum had been blown away" (Journal of the American Medical Association [JAMA], May 27, 1992, p. 2798).

When Humes revealed this, he was unaware that in 1975, Dr. Fred Hodges, the then-chief of neuro-radiology at the John Hopkins medical school, examined the skull x-rays and found they showed a "goodly portion" of the right brain to be "missing."

BTW, the term "goodly portion" is a common and recognized idiom that means "substantial," "considerable," "sizeable." One can find the term "goodly portion" used in medical journals, including JAMA. Google AI says, "The phrase 'goodly portion' is used throughout the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) and its network journals as an idiom representing a large or substantial amount."

-- A number of eyewitnesses who got good looks at the damage to JFK's head said that a substantial part of the brain was blown away. These witnesses included mortician Tom Robinson, assistant autopsy photographer Floyd Riebe, Secret Service agent Clint Hill (who stared into the large hole in JFK's head for several minutes from 3-4 feet away), and FBI agent Francis O'Neill (one of the two FBI agents who observed the autopsy, and observed it from close range most of the time).

-- The autopsy photographer, John Stringer, told the ARRB he was certain he did not take the extant autopsy brain photos.

My posts in this thread present a detailed review of this evidence, including sources. The above is just a summary. To gain a better understanding of this crucial evidence, and to see the vacuous attempts of WC apologists to explain it, I recommend going back and reading the rest of the thread.

To follow up on these points for those who have not seen any of the JFK autopsy brain photos, we should understand that the photos show a large laceration (cut) on the right side of the brain, as if someone took a knife and made a nearly straight cut from back to front/front to back just to the right of the midline of the brain, but they show virtually no missing brain tissue.

Dr. Baden's admission that the autopsy brain photos show "less than 1-2 ounces" of missing tissue may even be something of an overstatement. When neurologist Dr. Michael Chesser examined the autopsy brain photos, he could discern virtually no missing tissue.

Crucially, Dr. Chesser also saw (1) no damage whatsoever to the cerebellum except for a “tiny sliver hanging loose” from the bottom of the cerebellum, and (2) no damage to the rear area of the right occipital lobe, yet the rear head entry wound described in the autopsy report would have required the bullet to tear through the top part of the cerebellum and through the rear part of the right occipital lobe.

If one assumes a somewhat upward trajectory for the bullet that hit slightly above the EOP, it could have barely missed the cerebellum, but it could not have missed the rear section of the right occipital lobe. The HSCA forensic experts cited this fact as "incontrovertible" evidence against the autopsy report's placement of the rear head entry wound.

Another powerful point of evidence against the autopsy brain photos, and it's a point I haven't mentioned yet, is that if the righthand temporal-parietal explosion seen in the Zapruder film is authentic, there should be a sizable defect, a sizable area of missing brain tissue, in the right side of the temporal and parietal lobes in the brain photos, but no such defect is there.

79
Dented neck was to hold wadding for a blank round.

How do you know this?
80
Mark Lane was a charlatan. Nothing more. Nothing less.
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10