When I first read this, I thought you were being facetious but the more I thought about this, I wonder if that could have been a real problem. By allowing the Navy corpsman to assist in the search of the limo, it could be argued that the Secret Service had failed to secure the crime scene, and the limo was a crime scene. That could make any evidence collected from the limo inadmissible. Since the fragmented bullet was from the kill shot to the head, without those fragments being admitted, it could be problematic proving Oswald had caused the death of JFK. Henry Wade could have still prosecuted Oswald for Tippit's murder and that too was a capital crime, but it might not have been possible to convict Oswald for JFK's murder.

This might seem a bit farfetched but keep in mind this was before the Warren Court greatly expanding the exclusionary rule which allowed defense attorneys to get incriminating evidence dismissed on very technical grounds. I can't remember the exact case but I seem to remember a case where the police department had seized a car and taken it to a private garage to be searched for evidence. It turned out the city's contract with the private garage had expired so technically the car was no longer in possession of the police department and therefore all the evidence taken from the car was ruled inadmissible.

If there are any lawyers among our readers, I wonder if they could weigh in on this issue.

I know well the problem of inaccuracy with Ai, but Grok has a good record from my experience. Not perfect mind you. But the following is worth considering

https://x.com/i/grok/share/f4b0c295a9a446d880d81dd59cb3e15e

At the time of his post May 24, 1964 testimony, he was assuming that they were bullet holes. And rightly so. The questions that he was being asked in the testimony about trajectory alignment seemed rather pointless after he pointed out to Specter that he hadn't made a very thorough study of the Zapruder film.

JBC had a hole in his back and another in his chest. His clothes had holes in the same location. Who in their right mind would argue that the holes in his body and the holes in his clothes were not caused by the same bullet?

A guess implies the absence of a memory. But people recalling a distinct tempo of the shots were not guessing.

  Everybody was guessing. Some just guessed better than others.

A guess implies the absence of a memory. But people recalling a distinct tempo of the shots were not guessing. Here is Harold Norman relating the tempo of the shots (at the 0:24 sec mark)

His recreation is 5 seconds. If it had been 10 seconds, it would be noticeably slower. You don’t think Norman would have known the difference?

Norman also recalled that when he heard the 1st shot it was when JFKs right hand was up to his head
As though he was brushing his Hair. That’s remarkably coincidental with JFK at the Z190 frame.

The reason I have not dismissed a Z190 1st shot is because it seems about how long it would take for the shooter to have leaned over , position the rifle on the boxes, adjust rifle to align his scope reticle and start adjusting as for the moving JFK. If the shooter had arranged those boxes to use as a rifle rest , then he most likely had envisioned the 1st  vertical angle that he would  attempt  the 1st shot just as he envisioned the horizontal plane angle by how he positioned the boxes at the angle they were relative to the window ledge.

The Z190 1st shot fits well enough with the 1….2..3 pattern and it’s closer  to Norman’s 5 sec sequence.

As far as the tree foliage , it could be that the shooter was able to have positioned his rifle as early  as Z140-Z170 but he took longer than he had anticipated for tracking JFK in using the scope sight picture.  Because of that more narrowly focused area , the shooters peripheral vision was lessened such that perhaps  tree foliage appeared in his sight picture suddenly just AS he squeezed the trigger.

There is still the Tague problem however. It doesn’t seem to be plausible that a  Z313 fragment could fly over the windshield and drop down if it had enough velocity to haves chipped the curb. Maybe a lead fragment traveling at 200 ft/ sec  can chip off  a small particle of concrete from the curb?   IDK.

So you are saying the sign-in at the airport lounge and arrest record alias were just wild coincidences and that accusation just arose out of nowhere?...