JFK Assassination Forum

     After 62+ yrs, I have proven there was an impostor masquerading as a motorcycle cop inside the railroad yard immediately after the kill shot.

You've proved it to your satisfaction which is a rather low bar. But let's give you the benefit of the doubt and say that is not Officer Haygood. That's a long way from proving conspiracy. You would first need to prove who it is and that it is not a DPD officer. Then you would have to prove that this person was working with the assassin Lee Harvey Oswald. You've got some work to do.
 

And you ask, "What difference does that make"? Are you aware of anyone that on 11/22/63, had a DPD motorcycle cop uniform just laying around and decided to wear it inside Dealey Plaza?

I don't have to be aware of any such thing. The burden is on you to prove your hypothesis. You apparently have proved it to your satisfaction, but if you expect anyone to take you seriously, you'll have to do better than that.

And then, after the kill shot, for whatever reason, decided to race back deep inside the railroad yard? Getting back inside there BEFORE anyone connected to law enforcement managed to get back there? That Phony Motorcycle Cop was in costume, back inside the railroad yard before the kill shot. The proof of this Masquerading Motorcycle Cop proves a conspiracy. This is right in line with the Rob Reiner presentation.
   

Your approach is typical of what I have seen in 35 years of engaging with conspiracy hobbyists. You treat every anomaly, every unexplained event as proof of a conspiracy. It isn't enough to raise questions. You need to find answers if you want to prove your case. You don't get to say, we don't know the answer to these questions so the answer must be that there was a conspiracy. Sorry, but conspiracy is not the default answer for every unexplained question raised. You need to prove that the cop in question is not a DPD cop and that he was a co-conspirator in the assassination of JFK. But that is a step conspiracy hobbyists never take and few even bother to try. You don't prove anything simply by raising questions. You have to prove the answers to the questions you raise. You haven't even come close.

Regardless, here's a friendly reminder for you:

"Libertarians are the worst -- especially pro-Trump Libertarians."

Better a Libertarian than a Libtard

Why do you keep making strawman arguments?

Okay, try this:

"What specific problems do you see with the conclusions of the Senate Select Committee investigation and the Mueller investigation, and why do you weigh the evidence differently than they did?"

Rephrased:

"I agree committees aren’t automatically right, as the HSCA showed. But in this specific case, why do you find the Senate Intelligence Committee’s conclusions on the degree of Russian interference unpersuasive, especially given the alignment with Mueller and the intelligence agencies?"


Regardless, here's a friendly reminder for you:

"Libertarians are the worst -- especially pro-Trump Libertarians."

AFFIDAVIT IN ANY FACT
THE STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF DALLAS
BEFORE ME, Mary Rattan, a Notary Public in and for said County, State of Texas, on this day personally appeared Johnny Calvin Brewer w/m/22 of 512 N. Lancaster, Apt. 102, WH1 4793. Bus: 213 W. Jefferson, Hardy Shoe Store who, after being by me duly sworn, on oath deposes and says:

Friday November 22, 1963 I was at work at Hardy's Shoe Store, 213 West Jefferson. I had heard on the radio that the President had been shot, also that a policeman had been shot in Oak Cliff. About 1:30 pm I saw a man standing in the lobby of the shoe store. This man was wearing a brown sport shirt. He also acted as if he was scared. About this time a police car came up the street going west on Jefferson. When the police car reached Zangs it made a turn and went back east on Jefferson. After the police car passed, the man in the lobby walked up on Jefferson toward the Texas Theater. I followed the man up the street and he went into the theater. I asked the girl if she had sold the man a ticket and she replied that she did not think so, that she had been listening to the radio and did not remember. I went into the show and asked Butch, the concession man, if he had seen the man come in. Butch said that he had been busy and did not notice. Butch and I then checked the exits to see if any of them had been opened. The exits were all closed and did not appear to have been opened. I then went back to the box office and told Julie [sic] to call the police. When the police arrived the show was stopped and the lights were turned on. A man in the middle section about five or six rows of seats from the back stood up when the lights were turned on. An officer approached him and he hit the officer and knocked him back. Several other officers then joined the fight and the man was taken out of the theater. This was the same man I had seen in front of the shoe store where I work. The reason I noticed the man in front of the store was because he acted so nervous, and I thought at the time he might be the man that had shot the policeman.

/s/ Johnny C. Brewer

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN BEFORE ME THIS 6 DAY OF December A.D. 1963

/s/ Mary Rattan
Notary Public, Dallas County, Texas

Your inability to answer such a simple question says a lot about you.

     After 62+ yrs, I have proven there was an impostor masquerading as a motorcycle cop inside the railroad yard immediately after the kill shot. And you ask, "What difference does that make"? Are you aware of anyone that on 11/22/63, had a DPD motorcycle cop uniform just laying around and decided to wear it inside Dealey Plaza? And then, after the kill shot, for whatever reason, decided to race back deep inside the railroad yard? Getting back inside there BEFORE anyone connected to law enforcement managed to get back there? That Phony Motorcycle Cop was in costume, back inside the railroad yard before the kill shot. The proof of this Masquerading Motorcycle Cop proves a conspiracy. This is right in line with the Rob Reiner presentation.