JFK Assassination Forum

RS:  I am talking about the dirt road portion of the Elm St Extension.

So why did you bring up the limo turn and traffic signal in the Wegman film?

there are NO BOLLARDS between Officer Harkness and this alleged motorcycle cop.

Yes there are! Not only can you see many of them in the Darnell film, others are made obvious when the motorcycle cop walks behind them.

Here, bollards are outlined in red. Note that one is in Harkness' shadow:


Here, "B" marks where the line of bollards is. You can see that two of them are silhouetted by the MC as he walks behind them:


Here he is a half step later:

   The image above is a "cropped" Darnell Film still frame. Buddy Walthers is actually included in this still frame. He is pictured to the extreme (L) on this same still frame. The 2 DPD Police Officers in this photo have for 62+ years been ID'd as being DPD Motorcycle Officer Haygood, (wearing the White Helmet), and Officer Harkness. Officer Haygood is the ONLY DPD MOTORCYCLE COP to have been back inside the railroad immediately after the kill shot.  At 12:35 PM, Haygood made a documented radio transmission from his motorcycle parked on the Elm St curb near the Triple Underpass. That is why this still frame has always been time stamped 12:34 PM. Officer Haygood had to be back at his motorcycle by 12:35 to make that 12:35 radio transmission. The other DPD Cop on this still frame is Officer Harkness. Harkness made a documented 12:36 police radio transmission. On that transmission, Officer Harkness said he had an eyewitness that he was bringing to the TSBD. Harkness then put this eyewitness/Amos Euins on the back of this 3 Wheel Motorcycle and took Euins to the TSBD. When Harkness arrived at the TSBD with the eyewitness/Amos Euins, he was instructed to place Euins inside Inspector Sawyer's car. Inspector Sawyer arrived at the TSBD at 12:35. The loading of Euins into Sawyer's car would be happening at 12:37. Upon finishing with the loading of Euins into the car, Officer Harkness was instructed to go and secure the area behind the TSBD. This is where we see Officer Harkness on the above Darnell still frame. Officer Harkness is securing the rear of the TSBD. The CORRECT TIME STAMP for the still frame above would therefore be 12:38. The motorcycle officer in the white helmet that we see above in this Darnell still frame can NOT BE Officer Haygood. Officer Haygood was back at his motorcycle making a documented police transmission at 12:35. After making that 12:35 radio transmission, Haygood then stayed there alongside his motorcycle and interviewed JFK Assassination Eyewitnesses. With Officer Haygood being the only known DPD Motorcycle Cop inside the railroad yard immediately following the kill shot, reveals this motorcycle cop we see in the above Darnell still frame to be an impostor. This begs the following questions:  (1) Who is this impostor? (2) Where is his motorcycle? (3) Where did he come from? (4) Where is he going?   

   12:34 PM - The above showing Motorcycle Officer Haygood is IMPOSSIBLE. Haygood and Officer Harkness could not be filmed together at 12:34. Without question impossible. This alleged motorcycle officer is an impostor. (1) Who is he? (2) Where is his motorcycle? (3) What is he holding? (4) Where is he headed?

According to Detective Buddy Walters, there were a number of officers in that particular area at that time. Why did you identify the two officers as Harkness and Haygood?

Mr. WALTHERS. And at that time I heard the shots as well as everybody else, but as we got over this fence, and a lot of officers and people were just rummaging through the train yards back in this parking area.
Mr. LIEBELER. In the parking area down there? West of the Texas School Book Depository Building between the Texas School Book Depository and the railroad tracks?
Mr. WALTHERS. Yes; and the discussion came up among several of the officers, "Were there any shots fired?" And I said, "Well, they sounded like rifle shots to me." At the time no one knew---in our crowd they were sure the shots had been fired though because of the reports---we heard the noise, and I left then and went back up here and came back onto the street.

 

And you're an impostor of someone who actually knows how to properly analyze films and photos.

  Why aren't you jumping all over that horrible "analyzing" of Willis 21/Prayer Man  in the thread above?  Why aren't you there? Go do your Chef Tony with the Ginsu Knives routine over there. It's not hard to do over there if you have a broad based JFK Assassination foundation. I just blew that "analysis" up. But maybe needing a broad based JFK Assassination Foundation immediately cancels you out? Or is it simply your suffering from SDS? 

ME: What were the specific conclusions of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence regarding whether or not Russia had interfered in the 2016 election?

GROK: The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI), in its bipartisan five-volume report on Russian Active Measures Campaigns and Interference in the 2016 U.S. Election (released across 2019–2020, with the final Volume 5 on August 18, 2020), reached the following specific conclusions regarding Russian interference:

Russia conducted an aggressive, multifaceted influence operation aimed at the 2016 presidential election. The Committee explicitly found that the Russian government engaged in an aggressive, multi-faceted effort to influence, or attempt to influence, the outcome of the 2016 presidential election.

Newsflash: The Soviets/Russians have been meddling in our elections for as long as anyone can remember and we have meddled in theirs. There isn't an iota of evidence that any of these efforts has affected the outcome of a single election. Democrats don't want to admit one of the reasons Trump beat Hillary and Kamala is because the Democrats nominated losers. Hillary is one of the worst candidates in recent memory. From the time she first sought elective office, her poll numbers have always peaked at the start of her campaign and then tumbled before the votes were cast. That was true of her run for the Senate which she won anyway. That was true in 2008 when despite having the Democrat establishment on her side, she still managed to lose the nomination to a relative newcomer by the name of Barack Obama. She would have repeated that feat in 2016 if the Democrat establishment hadn't put their thumb on the scale through the use of unelected superdelegates who ensured it would be the party establishment that would choose the nominee, not the primary voters. Otherwise Bernie Sanders would likely have won the nomination. Once handed the nomination, she managed to lose a general election almost every pundit didn't think was possible.

Kamala might have been even worse. In 2020, she was polling 4th in her home state when she dropped out of the race before the first primary or caucus. Still Sleepy Joe Biden was told to pick her as his running mate in what was obviously a DEI hire. The plan was for Joe to get elected masquerading as a moderate, then Joe was supposed to step aside, either midway through his term but at the latest, before the 2024 primary season. Joe screwed them over when he refused to step aside as he had promised. Knowing they couldn't hide Biden's severe mental decline any longer, the Democrat establishment sabotaged Joe by taking the unprecedented step of scheduling the first debate a month before the conventions knowing it was likely Joe would have a disastrous debate which would give them justification to remove him from the ticket. It worked. The Democrats took the unprecedented, undemocratic step of rejecting the person who won all the primaries and arbitrarily chose Kamala Harris to be their nominee. Over the next 107 days, Kamala made a bonfire out of $1.5 billion and turned a 3% lead in the average of the polls into a 2% defeat in the election, losing every single swing state in the process.

And of course, rather than accept any accountability for their poor choice of candidates, the party chose to blame Russian influence for their own failures. They even went so far as to burn their own post-mortem report which would have disclosed their incompetence. The ultimate irony is that this is the party that claims they are fighting for democracy. Democrats claim to love democracy until democracy kicks their asses which it frequently does. Then they do everything in their power to delegitimize the choice of the voters.

He is an impostor.

And you're an impostor of someone who actually knows how to properly analyze films and photos.