JFK Assassination Forum

Trump didn't lose the 2020 election democrats forged more than enough "ballots" to win. Look how bad things got in those four years $7.00 for a dozen eggs. My local store has them on sale for $.79 this week.

Of you last two posts I sort of agree with the first but not the second. Yes, I did think the Democrats cheated in 2020. They always do. I don't think there cheating made the difference in any of the five states the Democrats flipped from the 2016 election. For the Democrats to have stolen the election, they would have stolen at least three of those five states. I have a hard time believing they stole even one. I did go to bed on election night in 2020 believing Trump had won. Arizona had flipped to the Democrats but Trump seemed to be leading in the three blue wall states and Georgia. What I didn't realize is that the early votes had not been counted yet. That is my one gripe. I think people would have had more confidence in the results had the early votes been the first ones counted and made public and there was no reason they couldn't have been. They could have been counted in advance and the totals released the minute the polls closed. Back in the day when the only early voting that was done was absentee ballots. When the news organizations released those counts, they would usually tell their views that those tended to be Republican votes because they were the ones who would me more likely to be out of town on election day. Once early voting became widely available, those tend to be heavily Democrat votes. Had those votes been thrown into the mix from the start, it never would have appeared Trump was winning the key toss up states. Instead it gave the appearance that the Democrats were waiting to see how many votes they needed before those votes were added in.

As for Trump being the best president in my lifetime, I'm taking a wait and see approach. Right now, I would give that honor to Reagan but that could change depending on what Trump accomplishes in the next 3 years.

 Good Grief, Tom!
 
  There's no escape from you haters of President Trump!  Not even in a place like this forum.
 I think your post here is both rude and uncalled for.

 

Here is a fine example two witnesses heard the frontal shot and were convinced to change their story.

Both Ken O'Donnell and Dave Powers said that O'Neil's claims that they were convinced to change their account were not true.

O'Donnell: "The story [that he changed his story] is an absolute lie…whoever gave that story is lying. It’s an absolute, outright lie." – Kenneth O’Donnell, Chicago Tribune, June 15, 1975.



And here: https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=lQhIAAAAIBAJ&sjid=TQANAAAAIBAJ&pg=1934%2C3948488&hl=en

It's remarkable how candid the WC was about the possibility of only two shots:

"The consensus among the witnesses at the scene was that three shots were fired. However, some heard only two shots, while others testified that they heard four and perhaps as many as five or six shots. ... The physical and other evidence examined by the Commission compels the conclusion that at least two shots were fired. ... It is possible that the assassin carried an empty shell in the rifle and fired only two shots, with the witnesses hearing multiple noises made by the same shot. ... The eyewitness testimony may be subconsciously colored by the extensive publicity given the conclusion that three shots were fired."

Of course, as previously stated this was not the WC going out on any limb because, if anything, the two-shot scenario makes the LN narrative even less problematical.

Here is a fine example two witnesses heard the frontal shot and were convinced to change their story.

There is zero forensic, medical, or eyewitness evidence of a gunman on the GK. Nothing but a bunch of people who thought the shots sounded like they came from that direction. Another bunch of people said the shots sounded like they came from the direction of the TSBD. There is forensic evidence and eyewitnesses who corroborate the latter group. There is zero corroboration to support the former.

John, you are once again absolutely correct. Cute that people here are still using Lee Bowers to support the notion of a shot from the front..