Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10
71
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Alert to Duncan
« Last post by Mark A. Oblazney on October 19, 2026, 06:16:27 PM »
Is it possible auto-correct thought you were trying to be sneaky and spell the ‘F’ word differently? These a.i. checkers can be real prudes.  Try Dr. Chink and see what happens lol
72
Graves seems to have a dual case of Trump Derangement Syndrome and Putin Derangement Syndrome. 304 electoral votes put Trump in the White House. He actually won 307 but three faithless electors chose not to vote for the man they pledged to vote for. Putin had nothing to do with electing those 304 electors. The people of the various states voted for them.
73
Dale Myers emailed me. He says the Tippit-Volkland story was published in Ramparts in 1966. Myers mentions the story in his book With Malice, 1988, p.46 and 2013, p.94, 450 and a lengthy endnote, No. 270 on pp. 704-706.
74
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Alert to Duncan
« Last post by John Corbett on October 19, 2026, 05:39:29 PM »
In another thread, when I typed in the name of Dr. F-i-n-c-k it got auto-corrected to xxxx. This happened twice and the second time, I made sure I had not made a typo so there appears to be glitch.
75
    Perry did Not provide confirmation of what you are claiming was already the theory of the autopsy Drs. I am getting tired of having to correct the Baloney you continue throwing out there. Either stop or save this stuff for the Ed Forum where you can get away with it.
You don't get to tell me what I can or cannot post on this forum any more than I get to tell you that. I wouldn't try even if I could because you expose your poor analytical skills with every post you make.

76
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Paul Landis And What He Said
« Last post by John Corbett on October 19, 2026, 05:31:13 PM »
   People pass and then nobody living can be hurt physically or professionally when information is revealed. This is especially true when organized crime is involved. We see this now unfolding with the OJ Simpson case. Which also remains Unsolved.

The OJ Simpson case was solved, just not to the satisfaction of a gullible and sympathetic jury who got hoodwinked by a crafty and highly skilled legal team. The jury in the civil case got it right.

Oswald and OJ had two things in common. Both murdered two people and neither was ever convicted for it.
77
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Paul Landis And What He Said
« Last post by Royell Storing on October 19, 2026, 05:20:51 PM »
Landis probably was a solid guy when he left the Secret Service. That's why it is not credible that he would have handled such an important piece of evidence as a bullet in such an incompetent manner as he claims to have done with CE399. He clearly didn't have all his marbles when he told his fantastic story in 2023, 60 years after the fact. Time affects all of us, both physically and mentally. His story makes no sense and doesn't jibe with other known facts.

   People pass and then nobody living can be hurt physically or professionally when information is revealed. This is especially true when organized crime is involved. We see this now unfolding with the OJ Simpson case. Which also remains Unsolved.
78
I've yet to see you post anything that seemed to be the result of serious research. Humes, Boswell, and xxxx were initially confused by the fact they had an entrance wound, no apparent exit, and no bullet in the body. Once they traced the path of the bullet, it led them to the damaged trachea rings making it apparent it had exited the throat, a finding the confirmed when the talked to Perry and learned he had performed the tracheostomy over the exit wound.

    Perry did Not provide confirmation of what you are claiming was already the theory of the autopsy Drs. I am getting tired of having to correct the Baloney you continue throwing out there. Either stop or save this stuff for the Ed Forum where you can get away with it.
79
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Paul Landis And What He Said
« Last post by John Corbett on October 19, 2026, 05:07:00 PM »
Paul Landis passed the rather high hurdle to becoming a Secret Service agent, left with an unblemished record, and has never even been accused of sensationalism, publicity-seeking, ideological extremism, or delusions in the years after he left the Secret Service.

So how is Paul Landis not a solid guy?

Landis probably was a solid guy when he left the Secret Service. That's why it is not credible that he would have handled such an important piece of evidence as a bullet in such an incompetent manner as he claims to have done with CE399. He clearly didn't have all his marbles when he told his fantastic story in 2023, 60 years after the fact. Time affects all of us, both physically and mentally. His story makes no sense and doesn't jibe with other known facts.
80

This is where people who should back you and strike down a nutty claim don't...

That's why the current internet JFK research community is more interested in NOT solving the conspiracy than solving it...

No credible researcher would deny that is Lovelady & Shelley going up extension in Couch/Darnell...

    The above shows you have NOTHING to Prove those "2 Guys" on the Couch/Darnell Films are Lovelady/Shelley. The WC testimonies of Lovelady and Shelley are Proof. I supply Proof, you supply only huff-n-puff.
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10