61
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: How Do LNers Deal With Givens?
« Last post by John Corbett on September 30, 2026, 05:37:44 PM »Rolland said he saw 12:15 on the digital clock on the TSBD roof as he was watching the black man hanging out the SE 6th floor window (thus the SN window higher than the 15.5 in height?) Now there may be some wiggle room here with whatever clock or watch Mrs Reid was using since she’s the one in charge of the group of female employees who began leaving the 2nd floor lunchroom possibly as early as 12:10 according to some other clock which may have been off +/- 3 minutes relative to the rooftop digital clock.
Presuming Mrs Reid and Roy Truly were managers whom kept clocks in the building in sync as much as practical with the TSBD rooftop clock and if they were off the sort that prefer “on time” work performance then it’s doubtful they would not check those clocks routinely and not let them be lagging behind by as much as 5 minutes relative to the digital clock.
Problem is, I just don’t know for certain. Some managers can be obsessed with being “on time”, while others might not. Mrs Reid the supervisor and Roy Truly the building manager , come across in their WC testimonies as being the more time conscious type of manager.
So if we attempt another sequence of estimations of the various people going up and down the stairs and locations of where they were between 11:45-12:31 then I would start with a variance of clocks being not more than 3 minutes slower or faster than the TSBD roof top clock.
I find it hard to believe that anyone would bother making note of the time that they observed something that would have seemed completely inconsequential at the time. I can believe that someone would look up and see Oswald on the sixth floor and either a little before or a little after look up and notice the time on the Hertz clock. I can see how someone could connect those two observations later on from memory but that doesn't establish that the two happened at the same time. I continue to be amazed at how much faith people have in other people's ability to remember fine details when those details would not have seemed the least bit important at the time. People do not have DVDs in their brains. Memories are nothing more than bits and pieces which we try to reconstruct later when asked to do so. We tend to remember important things but few people remember things clearly that wouldn't have seemed the least bit important at the time.
The least compelling arguments I see posted on this and other forums are the ones that begin "so-and-so said", as if that is proof of anything.
Recent Posts


