Tucker Carlson, who has gone bananas in recent months, and has involuntary arm spasms and loses his bowels when he hears the words/acronym "CIA" or "Mossad," has upgraded Morley's dog-whistle into giving Israel the leading role in the JFKA. 

The CIA merely acquiesced.

Indeed, across the political left, the compulsive obsession now is not the CIA or "US military industrial complex" or white supremacy, but rather the nation across a big ocean, and with 8 million Jews, Israel.

However, historically, in general I assent to your view on the political left's monomania with US intel agencies and their possible role in the JFKA.

But, as of now, the CIA has been supplanted by Mossad, in the most-repeated JFKA narratives.

Which goes to show, the ideology writes the agenda, and the agenda writes the narrative.

The KGB (today's SVR and FSB) is a world-class humanitarian organization!!!

Just ask Kash Patel and The Traitorous Orange Turd!!!

When I say "pro-IRGC influencers are active in the JFKA research space"--are there any doubters?

Note how Morley's narrative on the JFKA has mutated from "the CIA did it," to his "Mossad did it with Angleton," dog-whistle on the Tucker Carlson show.

Wasn't Angleton CIA?

Who perped the CIAers?

You are using your conclusion that an early shot occurred to explain what you think is a subtle "startle reaction" of JFK and Jackie's very slight head turn farther to the left and then using those reactions to bolster your argument that there was an early missed shot.

We don't know how subtle or gross JFK's (or anyone else's) startle reaction was to Oswald's first, missing-everything, shot, half-a-second before Zapruder resumed filming at Z-133 because . . . well . . . Zapruder wasn't filming at the time.

Typically, however, a startle reaction to an unexpected loud noise is a not-very-noticeable hunching of the shoulders.

It is therefore understandable that no one noticed JFK's "startle reaction" to that early shot.

Thank God that Mary Woodward noticed and wrote down JFK's quickly turning and Jackie's accelerated turning of their heads, consciously and in a quizzical manner, about a second after said "backfire-like" first shot.

It's a pity, though, that she conflated other things that happened before and after said shot with what happened before and after the second shot, as indicated by her reporting that the limo "nearly came to a halt" after the first shot.

Did you happen to notice the car is turning the corner? As such, the perspective of Zapruder's camera to the car is constantly changing as the car makes the turn. Bennett is not leaning right. The backseat is moving right in relation to Zapruder's sight line. This isn't exactly rocket science.

Is that what's causing George Hickey to lean over the other side of the car in Z-150?

Centripetal (or is it centrifugal?) force?

How may Gs do you figure they're pulling?

https://assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z150.jpg


By the way, regarding your beloved "jiggle analysis" approach, the HSCA's scientific panel concluded that, based on its "blur analysis" of the Zapruder frames, JFK and Connally were struck by one bullet at approximately Z-190.

Do you agree with the panel's conclusion, timing wise?


PS How about Z-153, Werner Von Braun?

Can you detect Bennett's lean, yet?

https://assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z153.jpg

Absolutely not.

You're beyond hope, then.

Especially if you compare said tilt with the way he looked in frame Z-138.

https://assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z138.jpg