Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10
61
Regarding the sniper's nest shooter, you somehow left out the parts: (1) shooter is standing straight up, (2) firing straight down, (3) firing through a 1/4 open window, (4) leaves hulls behind, and (5) leaves weapon behind. If this is not a "frame job", it has got to be a "crummy sniper".

Dear Comrade Storing,

1) Not straight up; standing and awkwardly leaning forward

2) Not straight down, but at a steep downward angle, nevertheless

3) Through a 1/3 open window

4) So what if he left the three shells behind?

5) Should he have taken the short-rifle downstairs with him, walked a quarter-of-a-mile and gotten on the bus with it?

6) He was a former Marine sharpshooter. Anyone would have had a hard time making that first shot.

D'oh!



62
Sandy Larsen didn't have a blessed clue about the Kennedy assassination.

He was a devotee of the "Harvey and Lee and Hank and Harry and the Four Marguerites" Cult.
63
Sandy Larsen didn't have a blessed clue about the Kennedy assassination.
If a neophyte wanted to quickly learn about the assassination in a sort of "JFK Assassination for Dummies" manner all he has to do is read Larsen's claims and take the opposite view. If Larsen said "A" happened then you can safely conclude that "A" didn't happen. Whether Mexico City or JFK and Vietnam, or the shots, anything; all one has to do is take the opposite and you'll get a good idea as to what happened.
64
Just say "Uncle" and I will fill in the blanks for you. You notice that Hackerott now agrees that the Wiegman Film shows NO CAR parked alongside the Island, back from the corner? YOU were using Hackerott to carry your water on this issue. Now, he agrees with my "NO CAR" Discovery. This "getaway car" scenario is Not complicated, and it does Prove a CONSPIRACY. This is ALL about simply accumulating Facts. Not solely searching for sniper's, or rifles, or gun smoke, etc. This myopic fixation explains how this "getaway car" was missed for almost 62 yrs.       

Dear Comrade Storing,

Are you going to share your Nobel Prize winnings with your hero, The Traitorous Orange Bird (rhymes with "Xxxx")?

-- Tom

65

and a claim that a doctor did not know the difference between tangential and parallel
I don’t see a difference between “tangential” and “zero degrees” when you are talking about a bullet path in relation to its target surface.  Perhaps you can tell us what you think the difference is and, if so, what angle other than zero degrees a tangential line would be to such a surface.
66
Dear Comrade Storing,

Why didn't the (crummy) sniper and spotter just stay in the car until the traffic thinned out a bit?

-- Tom

       Just say "Uncle" and I will fill in the blanks for you. You notice that Hackerott now agrees that the Wiegman Film shows NO CAR parked alongside the Island, back from the corner? YOU were using Hackerott to carry your water on this issue. Now, he agrees with my "NO CAR" Discovery.   
       This "getaway car" scenario is Not complicated, and it does Prove a CONSPIRACY. This is ALL about simply accumulating Facts. Not solely searching for sniper's, or rifles, or gun smoke, etc. This myopic fixation explains how this "getaway car" was missed for almost 62 yrs.         
67
Sandy Larsen didn't have a blessed clue about the Kennedy assassination.
68

Who else thinks he's right? Here's a partial list:

-- Dr. Greg Henkelmann, radiation oncologist.
-- Dr. Doug DeSalles, MD.
-- Dr. Michael Chesser, neurologist.
-- Dr. Arthur Haus, former chief of medical science at Kodak.
-- Dr. Gary Aguilar, board-certified ophthalmologist and one of the few doctors given permission to view the autopsy materials at the National Archives
-- Dr. Cyril Wecht, forensic pathologist and former president of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences
-- Dr. Robert Livingston, Nobel Prize-winning scientist, a former director of two NIH institutes, a former scientific director of the National Institute for Neurological Diseases, and the founder of the first-ever department of neuroscience at UCSD.
-- Dr. Charles Crenshaw, former chief of surgery at John Peter Smith Hospital in Fort Worth.
-- Dr. John Costella, a professor of physics at the University of Melbourne, and the author of four articles on physics published in the American Journal of Physics.

Just when I think Michael T. Griffith can't make me laugh any harder, he trots out John Costella to bolster David Mantik's ridiculous fake x-ray claims. Yes, the same John Costella who said he and Jack White were being followed and monitored while visiting Dealey Plaza. The same monitors that turned out to be sprinklers. These are the "experts" on whom Griffith relies.

Separately, please produce a source backing up your statement that Dr. Cyril Wecht believes the JFK autopsy x-rays are fake.
69
Have you ever considered the possibility that after 62 years of cover-up and official denial and refusal to release all assassination records... your understanding of these matters might be a product of a disinformation campaign... and photo tampering and false witnesses intended to do exactly what Hoover intended just hours after the assassination... "convince the public that Oswald is the real assassin?"

No, because that's complete nonsense. Continue having fun wildly misinterpreting every film and photo from the assassination though!
70
As I've said before, if you want to prove the backyard photos are authentic/pristine, conduct a reenactment with people who don't know what they're reenacting. Have them use an Imperial Reflex 620 camera and take three photos in the manner alleged for the backyard photos, and see if their photos contain the same tiny differences in the distances between background objects and if their photos exhibit only "slight" and "very small" horizontal and vertical camera movement between exposures.

And while you're at it, do parallax measurements to determine if there was any change in the camera's angular position between exposures. Unless the participants miraculously manage to avoid tilting the camera even in the slightest degree, you will find that the camera's angular position changed between exposures.

Uhh, no... YOU conduct the reenactment. YOU do the measurements. It's not the responsibility of other people to validate your long-debunked blathering about these photos, which have been proven authentic time and time again.
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10