Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10
61
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: The best evidence Ferrie and Clay Shaw were close acquaintences
« Last post by Gerry Down on March 26, 2026, 05:41:39 PM »
Quote from: John Corbett on March 26, 2026, 03:22:18 PM
Even if what Pena said is true, it is not evidence that either was involved in the assassination. Not at all. It's a big SO WHAT.

If what Pena said is true, wouldn't that mean Shaw lied the Garrison trial regarding knowing Ferrie?
62
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: The best evidence Ferrie and Clay Shaw were close acquaintences
« Last post by Gerry Down on March 26, 2026, 05:39:58 PM »
Quote from: Tommy Shanks on March 26, 2026, 01:52:41 PM
Gerry, no, it's isn't. Like Fred said earlier, the HSCA found that Pena was not a reliable witness. See page 193 of the HSCA final report. Why are you opting not to believe them?

The hsca reasoning in this regard was weak. Nothing Pena said was demonstrated to be untrue.
63
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Education Forum Moderated by Anti-Semitic Crackpot---John Simkin is Aware
« Last post by Dr. William Niederhut on March 26, 2026, 05:22:00 PM »
Pay careful attention, Anti-Truthers.   Listen and learn.

This will be my final post here.

The mainstream U.S. media and internet have been inundated with pseudo-scientific falsehoods about 9/11 for 25 years.

Here's the incontrovertible evidence of liquefied steel at Ground Zero.   

The Twin Towers were not demolished by Magic Jet Fuel. 

Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to liquefy steel.

Nor could it explosively pulverize hundreds of thousands of tons of concrete, furniture, and human bodies into pyroclastic ash flows.


64
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: The best evidence Ferrie and Clay Shaw were close acquaintences
« Last post by John Corbett on March 26, 2026, 03:22:18 PM »
Quote from: Gerry Down on March 26, 2026, 12:48:26 PM
The document has Orent Pena stating that Ferrie and Shaw knew each other.

Even if what Pena said is true, it is not evidence that either was involved in the assassination. Not at all. It's a big SO WHAT.
65
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: The best evidence Ferrie and Clay Shaw were close acquaintences
« Last post by Tommy Shanks on March 26, 2026, 01:52:41 PM »
Quote from: Gerry Down on March 26, 2026, 12:48:26 PM
Biggest discovery of 2026 so far?


Gerry, no, it's isn't. Like Fred said earlier, the HSCA found that Pena was not a reliable witness. See page 193 of the HSCA final report. Why are you opting not to believe them?
66
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: The best evidence Ferrie and Clay Shaw were close acquaintences
« Last post by Gerry Down on March 26, 2026, 12:48:26 PM »
Here are sections of the document Rob Clark was reading from the episode of The Lone Gunman podcast as referenced in my opening post. The RIF number does not seem to be available on Mary Ferrell so it seems Mr. Clark has managed to get his hands on a document that might not be very well known. The document has Orent Pena stating that Ferrie and Shaw knew each other.

Biggest discovery of 2026 so far?





67
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: A Car, A Garden, And A Coupla Guys
« Last post by Tom Graves on March 26, 2026, 11:22:46 AM »
Quote from: John Corbett on March 26, 2026, 10:19:05 AM
That's what you consider proof?

That speaks volumes about the way your mind works. Off al* the possible explanations, you gravitate to the most fantastic one possible.

*Offal, i.e., the parts that fall off during the butchering process
68
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: When the LN Narrative Ruled--And Snuffed Out Leads Into Cuba?
« Last post by John Corbett on March 26, 2026, 10:43:33 AM »
Quote from: Lance Payette on January 25, 2026, 01:58:42 PM
My problems with this are more philosophical. Given Oswald's purpose for going to MC and the state he was in after that purpose was frustrated, I find it exceedingly unlikely that anyone in any official capacity would have thought he was a likely candidate to assassinate JFK - or even a candidate for a discussion of the topic.

At the time of the MC trip, no one, not even Oswald, could possibly have known the golden opportunity chance circumstances were going to give Oswald to assassinate the POTUS. No one knew he was going to get a job at the TSBD. No one knew there was even going to be a motorcade through Dallas or that it would be routed down Elm St., right by the TSBD that Oswald would later be working at.

The assassination was a crime of opportunity. Had Oswald not been working in a building overlooking the motorcade route, I doubt any of us would even know who he was, even if he committed some other screwball act that might have given him some brief notoriety, such as assassination someone like General Walker.
69
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: How Did Bart Kamp Create The Lovelady Image?
« Last post by John Corbett on March 26, 2026, 10:32:57 AM »
Quote from: Royell Storing on March 25, 2026, 11:07:29 PM
   The "NO PARKING...." zone was close to the corner. No vehicle could have gotten in front of this car without hanging out onto Elm St. This ensured the "getaway" car could immediately turning onto Elm St when traffic was flowing again. They knew nobody would take this "NO PARKING...." spot, and they could pull into it at the very last moment. This spot alongside the Island was close to the corner, and close to the "wide open" Huge Gates. The Huge Gates provided clandestine entrance and exit to the TSBD.
     The "getaway" car was picking up a shooting team. Shooter + Spotter. Shooter + Spotter exited the TSBD via the Huge Gates, and then intended to get into the "getaway" car that was mere feet outside the Huge Gates.

All you have done is point out one POSSILBLE explanation for the circumstances and ignored all other possible explanations. That doesn't constitute proof. It's been my experience in the 3+ decades I have engaged with conspiracy hobbyists that is typically the way their minds work. They assume that everything they observe has a sinister explanation. People park in NO PARKING zones all the time. That doesn't mean they are part of an assassination team. Why would you think this one is evidence of a getaway car, especially since the car didn't getaway for 3 hours.
70
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: A Car, A Garden, And A Coupla Guys
« Last post by John Corbett on March 26, 2026, 10:19:05 AM »
Quote from: Royell Storing on March 26, 2026, 12:13:42 AM
                                                                         - DESERTED GETAWAY CAR -

    (1) Car rolled down the Elm St Extension while shots were being fired, (2) Car then parked in a clearly posted, "NO PARKING At Any Time" Zone, (3) Car remained in that same spot for 3+ Hrs after the kill shot.

That's what you consider proof?

That speaks volumes about the way your mind works. Off al the possible explanations, you gravitate to the most fantastic one possible.
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10