President Johnson was deeply concerned with information regarding alarming and threatening remarks made by Fidel Castro against JFK; and the mounting evidence of Cuba’s Minint officers’ connection in the assassination. The profound dislike between Castro and the Kennedys was mutual. On September 8, 1963, ten weeks before Lee Harvey Oswald murdered President Kennedy in Dallas, Fidel Castro spoke at a reception in the Brazilian Embassy in Havana. He raised his voice and said: “The United States’ leaders must realize that if they assist in the terrorist plans to eliminate Cuban leaders, they themselves will be in danger.”  [Haynes Johnson, “The Bay of Pigs” New York: Norton Company, 1964] p. 354

There are various accounts of Castro threatening, on Sept. 8 1963, retaliation for the many times the Kennedys tried to have him assassinated.

This article goes into LBJ's snuff job on investigations into Havana leads.

https://cubastrategicstudies.com/the-jfk-assasination-full-story-2/

I will post article also.

Interesting topic.

 

No, DPD Baker is just another witness in a large group of witnesses confirming that there never was an early missed shot. The eyewitnesses correlate where the first shot occurred by relating the limousines position to where they were standing. Motorcade 63 relates the first shot to Westbrook/ Calvery statements placing it between Z204 and Z212. The Chisms, Jean Newman, and Mary Woodward also place it in the same time frame.

The first shot was fired around Z157. Look at the photos below within a second both Connally and Jack Ready quickly turn their heads to the right.

No, DPD Baker is just another witness in a large group of witnesses confirming that there never was an early missed shot. The eyewitnesses correlate where the first shot occurred by relating the limousines position to where they were standing. Motorcade 63 relates the first shot to Westbrook/ Calvery statements placing it between Z204 and Z212. The Chisms, Jean Newman, and Mary Woodward also place it in the same time frame.

Willis puts the first shot before z202.  You have to be careful in trying to use a witness to pinpoint a shot.  Calvery/Westbrook used the same language to describe the location - not of JFK but of the President’s car. They both said that the President’s car was almost directly in front of where they were standing.



(Westbrook: 22H679) Given the uncertainty of the word “almost” as well as the uncertainty of which part of the car would have to be directly in front of them for them to consider the car to be in front of them, it is not possible to use their testimony to pinpoint the position of JFK to within a range smaller than about a car length, which is 21 feet or 21 frames.

Willis did not pinpoint the shot but set a precise after-bracket for it that is made precise by his photo.

Given the approximate nature of that kind of estimate and correlation to the zfilm it does not exclude the possibility of a shot fitting with Phil Willis’ evidence of a first shot just before z202.

No, DPD Baker is just another witness in a large group of witnesses confirming that there never was an early missed shot. The eyewitnesses correlate where the first shot occurred by relating the limousines position to where they were standing. Motorcade 63 relates the first shot to Westbrook/ Calvery statements placing it between Z204 and Z212. The Chisms, Jean Newman, and Mary Woodward also place it in the same time frame.

TS-

You are entitled to your views.

But I am trying to stay on topic: Morley.

Even if the US is a plutocracy, does that excuse Morley dog-whistling "Mossad perped the JFKA" on the Tucker Carlson show, and posting pro-IRGC propaganda on "X"?

Or, in your view (and possibly Morley's), the fact that the US is plutocracy means we must support left-wing and Islamist (or Moscow and IRGC) narratives on the JFKA?