Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10
61
This reminds me of CNN's hard hitting expose on the first Trump administration. The staff was holding an office party and Trump apparently got two scoops of ice cream when everyone else only got one. I'm not making this up.

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2017/05/12/trump-white-house-two-scoops-of-ice-cream-moos-dnt-erin.cnn

CNN not getting a Peabody Award for this story has to be one of the greatest snubs in history.
62
Either the report was bigger than everyone elses, or Earl Warren and LBJ had very small hands.



It's good to be the king.
63
Thanks so much, Duncan.  I appreciate you letting me know.

Nowadays, we can never be careful enough with the going-on with these stupid bots and attacks.

Sadly, things surely aren't as simple as they were when the internet was fresh and new.

No problem, Steve.

Members who do not log out of the Forum will remain logged on to the Forum for a minimum period of 24 hours.
64
It's a Forum security issue concerning Denial of Service (DoS) attacks.

A Denial of Service (DoS) attack is a malicious attempt to disrupt normal traffic of a targeted server, service, or network by overwhelming it with a flood of Internet traffic, making it unavailable to users.

These attacks can cause system crashes, slow performance, and, in DDoS (Distributed DoS) cases, use thousands of compromised devices (botnets) to flood the target, ie this Forum.

When I require Logged out members to Login at random times of my choosing, this tactic works in combating these attacks by reducing the number of pages that the Bots etc can attack.

Thanks so much, Duncan.  I appreciate you letting me know.

Nowadays, we can never be careful enough with the going-on with these stupid bots and attacks.

Sadly, things surely aren't as simple as they were when the internet was fresh and new. 
65
Several times per day throughout the week, the Sign-In page pops up and members of the Forum
have to sign in.  Is something bad going on here?

It's a Forum security issue concerning Denial of Service (DoS) attacks.

A Denial of Service (DoS) attack is a malicious attempt to disrupt normal traffic of a targeted server, service, or network by overwhelming it with a flood of Internet traffic, making it unavailable to users.

These attacks can cause system crashes, slow performance, and, in DDoS (Distributed DoS) cases, use thousands of compromised devices (botnets) to flood the target, ie this Forum.

When I require Logged out members to Login at random times of my choosing, this tactic works in combating these attacks by reducing the number of pages that the Bots etc can attack.
66

  So far, I have remained signed-in.
67

 Several times per day throughout the week, the Sign-In page pops up and members of the Forum
have to sign in.  Is something bad going on here? 
68
Dear Comrade Storing,

I "get it" that your MYSTO "ABANDONED" GETAWAY CAR was parked a little bit behind the "Signal Light Pole" / "No Parking Pole" in Hughes and Martin clips. I'm just saying that from the perspective of the Couch-Darnell and Wiegman films, the front of the very same car is visible to us to the right of the "Signal Light Pole" / "No Parking Pole," and that the reason we can't see it in the latter is because the gaggle of spectators is hiding it from view.

(If it's the same car that's in the National Geographic video, it's a 1958 Pontiac)



Question: Do you think the way James spliced together two half-second-apart Wiegman frames in his Couch-Darnell / Wiegman overlap montage was devious or misleading?

Ya gotta scroll down to it:

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,4597.40.html

-- Tom

    The car above is 17.5 Feet Long, and close to 5 Feet Tall. When parked, this car fills an exceptionally large rectangle of space. This space is so large that it would even house a Civil War Canon. The claim is being made that on 11/22/63, a "rectangle of invisibility" disappeared this car from the Wiegman Film. Even though Wiegman was filming this massive "space" while turning a corner, panning his camera, and filming images of this "space" from many, many, different angles. This "invisibility" claim is H.G. Wells worthy. We know what we do Not see on the Wiegman Film. We do Not see this "getaway" car parked alongside the Island on the Wiegman Film. Not Yet!
69
Either the report was bigger than everyone elses, or Earl Warren and LBJ had very small hands.



Photo op for the press.
70
We aren't talking about the Towner film, "Fedora Man" or a traffic signal here. They have no import on the issues in question.

Again --for the third time-- the Darnell film shows a line of bollards that run between Harkness and the motorcycle cop. Because of this, the dirt road cannot be  between Harkness and the MC. Period.

    I am talking about the dirt road portion of the Elm St Extension. When the alleged motorcycle cop changes directions, and walks DOWNWARD onto that dirt road, there are NO BOLLARDS between Officer Harkness and this alleged motorcycle cop. If the lack of clarity on the Darnell Film you are looking at is clouding your judgement, a good overhead view of this portion of the railroad yard will help. I can direct you to such if need be. Just let me know.
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10