Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10
61
Duncan better prepare for a surge in membership requests.

62
It is too bad "J. Kenneth McDonnald" (aka McDonald) is no longer alive, and we can't ask him.

McDonald was a highly regarded historian, writing in-house for the CIA, and using info the CIA, and the HSCA, provided to him.

McDonald never issued a correction to his statement on Shaw, and neither did the CIA.

I am not sure if McDonald also relied on OTR info, or info classified as "eyes only." Perhaps even information relayed only verbally.

All in all, I accept McDonald's work.





63
Am ZM--

The bullet hole in Gov. JBC's wrist bone (radius) is a biggie (see picture x-ray provided earlier).

I am a layman, but I doubt a shard from CE-399 could have done that.

64
Of course, if OSWALD HIMSELF really didn't care if he was caught or killed, then the TSBD6 and the LN narrative works fine.

Is this the Oswald that Frazier said was good with kids and who had just become a father of his second daughter?

John Wayne Gacy went one step further and voluntarily spent a lot of his personal time entertaining hospitalized children, John Wayne Gacy also raped, tortured and murdered at least thirty-three young men and boys between 1972 and 1978 in Norwood Park Township, a suburb of Chicago, Illinois.



JohnM
65
Howard Donahue was a court-certified ballistics and firearms expert. He was also a WWII veteran and a world-class rifleman. He was one of the 12 riflemen invited to fire in the 1967 CBS rifle test, and he was the only one who scored three hits in under 6 seconds (he did so on his third attempt). Donahue became interested in the JFK case and produced important research on the JFK shooting. Donahue's research is the subject of Bonar Menninger's 1992 book Mortal Error: The Shot That Killed JFK. Donahue passed away in December 1999.

Goodish wordage re Donahue.

And dont forget the goodish book by McLaren extending the goodish work of Donahue.

We now know that jfk woz hit on the back of the head by lead splatter from Oswald's shot-1 at about pseudo Z105-Z110, which ricocheted offa the overhead signal arm & left 2 halves of the jacket in the limo, & we know that the remnant main slug made a hole throo the floor of the limo.

We now know that Hickey fired an accidental auto-burst of at least 4 shots at about Z300-Z312, the first injuring Tague, the last hitting jfk in the head, the 2nd last denting the chrome trim.

We now know that Oswald fired just 2 shots, at about pseudo Z105-Z110 & at about Z218.5, & had 1 non-fired bullet remaining.
66
I have warned my wife since the beginning of the war not to become caught up in the sort of wishful thinking we see here. There is a real danger that Russia will destroy Ukraine if the situation becomes sufficiently desperate. "Military Ukraine" against "military Russia" is a dangerous and ultimately losing game if Russia goes nuclear. I say this as someone who has supported Ukraine to the tune of thousands of dollars (or at least Revived Soldiers Ukraine, https://www.rsukraine.org). Now is the time for a serious push for peace, but we don't see it from the U.S. or EU. This is from Fabian Hoffman, an acknowledged missile industry expert: "Assessments that Russia’s nuclear warheads have turned into a paper tiger appear unwarranted and unwise ... Those who argue that Russia no longer maintains a functioning deterrent are extrapolating from limited information, and such claims are not justified." https://missilematters.substack.com/p/the-state-and-viability-of-russias. I have said before that I believe The Donald actually cares precisely nothing about Ukraine, and I've seen nothing lately to change my opinion; at best, the fate of Ukraine is very low on his list of priorities.

Dear Fancy Pants Rants,

Should Ukraine let Putin keep the 20,000 kidnapped children, too?

-- Tom

67
Which is more likely:

1) Clay Shaw was, as the chief of CIA's History Staff, J. Kenneth McDonnald, wrote on 10 February 1992 after a rushed three-week examination of all of the HSCA's CIA documents on the JFKA, "a highly paid CIA contract source until 1956." 

--OR--

2) Clay Shaw was a highly valued CIA contact source until 1956?
68
I don't think anyone other than Oswald would choose TSBD6. It just has way too many risks associated with it. For that matter, I've expressed puzzlement that Oswald would choose it. It was the lunch hour, the M-C was nicely wrapped as curtain rods, no one paid any attention to Oswald anyway, and he could have easily decamped to a much more plausible location like the roof of the Dal-Tex or County Records building. Oswald and his M-C on TSBD6 makes sense if he was a dupe and was somehow (how?) induced to shoot from this unlikely location, with the conspirators (e.g., Mafia) not caring if he was caught or killed because he knew nothing anyway except that he was part of a pro-Castro plot. If he got lucky and killed JFK, that would be the end of the matter. However, because TSBD6 was highly risky and Oswald and his M-C were marginally reliable at best, a pro was stationed on the roof of the Dal-Tex or County Records building if needed (as he was). Either of those locations was essentially risk-free for a pro dressed like a businessman with a briefcase assassination rifle. In this scenario, Dealey Plaza really wasn't a bad assassination scene. I think this scenario makes near-perfect sense; the challenge is filling in the blanks with something resembling evidence, as John Orr is at least trying to do. If one doesn't like the Mafia scenario, an anti-Cuban pro works just as well.

Of course, if OSWALD HIMSELF really didn't care if he was caught or killed, then the TSBD6 and the LN narrative works fine.

Of course, if OSWALD HIMSELF really didn't care if he was caught or killed, then the TSBD6 and the LN narrative works fine.

Is this the Oswald that Frazier said was good with kids and who had just become a father of his second daughter?
69
I have warned my wife since the beginning of the war not to become caught up in the sort of wishful thinking we see here. There is a real danger that Russia will destroy Ukraine if the situation becomes sufficiently desperate. "Military Ukraine" against "military Russia" is a dangerous and ultimately losing game if Russia goes nuclear. I say this as someone who has supported Ukraine to the tune of thousands of dollars (or at least Revived Soldiers Ukraine, https://www.rsukraine.org). Now is the time for a serious push for peace, but we don't see it from the U.S. or EU. This is from Fabian Hoffman, an acknowledged missile industry expert: "Assessments that Russia’s nuclear warheads have turned into a paper tiger appear unwarranted and unwise ... Those who argue that Russia no longer maintains a functioning deterrent are extrapolating from limited information, and such claims are not justified." https://missilematters.substack.com/p/the-state-and-viability-of-russias. I have said before that I believe The Donald actually cares precisely nothing about Ukraine, and I've seen nothing lately to change my opinion; at best, the fate of Ukraine is very low on his list of priorities.

70
It's rumored 75% or more of their nuclear arsenal isn't functionable.

This is a rumor that makes sense. Corruption is rampant in Russia. Less likely to notice buying inferior tires for military vehicles than failing to maintain nuclear weapons. If you are going to cheat on anything it is on maintenance of nuclear weapons.

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10