Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10
61
To me these accounts are in the same category as crop circles which for a while confounded people including some in the scientific community until somebody showed how easy it was to create these circles with boards tether to a rope attached to a center point. I don't hear much about crop circles any more. Once the trick was revealed, the explanation was far more mundane than what had been speculated.

But yet you can embrace the idea that there was shot at Z152 with zero evidence there ever was one. An early missed shot is nothing but a fantasy. If that is how you feel about UFO sightings then I understand.

63
There were two themes that I hammered on at the Ed Forum to howls of protest: (1) the large body of psychological and sociological studies and literature that has accumulated over the past 20 years concerning the distinct conspiracy-prone mindset, and (2) the near-exact parallels between the UFO phenomenon and the JFKA and their respective communities of researchers, hobbyists and cultists.

No less a legend in his own mind than Jim DiEugenio said that my UFO analogy was the single most irritating thing about me for him. UFO believers are all wackos, you see, while he is a serious historian (albeit one who exemplifies the conspiracy-prone mindset to the nth degree).

I happen to think the UFO phenomenon is far, far more significant than the JFKA. It has the potential to alter our understanding of our place in the universe and even of the very nature of reality. If the LN narrative is correct, the JFKA is no more significant than the McKinley assassination. If certain conspiracy theories are correct, the JFKA might tell us something about the subsequent history and current state of the country – but not much, and pretty much nothing we couldn’t have figured out without worrying about the JFKA.

Like it or not, a truly vast body evidence, scientific studies and serious theorizing concerning the UFO phenomenon has accumulated over the past 75 or so years. Much of it has little or nothing to do with “space aliens,” and serious theories are all over the map. Even versions of the ET hypothesis are far more sophisticated and plausible than "space aliens" in nuts-and-bolts craft.

As with the JFKA, most people have no awareness whatsoever of this vast body of material. They glean their minimal understanding from the mainstream media and perhaps the occasional program on the Discovery Channel or video on YouTube. They either think the UFO phenomenon, like JFKA conspiracy theorizing, is all nonsense or they have some vague notion that “there must be something to it” but they don’t really know or care what this might be.

This near-complete lack of awareness is evident on this thread. For many, the term UFO conjures up nothing but images of wacky folks who think “space aliens” are visiting the planet in motherships and saucers from Zeta Reticuli and the Pleiades.

When the vast body of UFO material is viewed in the context of the latest thinking in the areas of physics, cosmology and consciousness, it becomes fascinating. Some of the more sophisticated UFO theories no longer seem nearly as far “out there” as they once did. As we see on this thread, however, most people have no clue. It’s all just “space aliens.”

As with the JFKA and every other area of weirdness and religion, the UFO community is absolutely plagued with hoaxsters, fraudsters, fast-buck artists, nutcase cultists, and folks deep in the grip of the conspiracy-prone mindset or even genuine mental illness. Indeed, in my opinion based on long experience and observation both the UFO and JFKA communities are dominated by these characters. (Don't come unglued, CTers. I'm talking about the LN side as well.) One has to work to find the serious and worthy-of-consideration aspect of either subject and separate the wheat from the chaff.


With the CTs, its all chaff and no wheat. None of them can provide any evidence to support the proposition that anyone other than Oswald were complicit in the crime.

Since I have studied the UFO phenomenon far less than the JFK assassination, I'm willing to be a bit more open minded but I remain unconvinced that there isn't a very mundane explanation for them. For the UFO buffs, I remain unconvinced there is any wheat and that it too isn't all chaff.
64
There were two themes that I hammered on at the Ed Forum to howls of protest: (1) the large body of psychological and sociological studies and literature that has accumulated over the past 20 years concerning the distinct conspiracy-prone mindset, and (2) the near-exact parallels between the UFO phenomenon and the JFKA and their respective communities of researchers, hobbyists and cultists.

No less a legend in his own mind than Jim DiEugenio said that my UFO analogy was the single most irritating thing about me for him. UFO believers are all wackos, you see, while he is a serious historian (albeit one who exemplifies the conspiracy-prone mindset to the nth degree).

I happen to think the UFO phenomenon is far, far more significant than the JFKA. It has the potential to alter our understanding of our place in the universe and even of the very nature of reality. If the LN narrative is correct, the JFKA is no more significant than the McKinley assassination. If certain conspiracy theories are correct, the JFKA might tell us something about the subsequent history and current state of the country – but not much, and pretty much nothing we couldn’t have figured out without worrying about the JFKA.

Like it or not, a truly vast body evidence, scientific studies and serious theorizing concerning the UFO phenomenon has accumulated over the past 75 or so years. Much of it has little or nothing to do with “space aliens,” and serious theories are all over the map. Even versions of the ET hypothesis are far more sophisticated and plausible than "space aliens" in nuts-and-bolts craft.

As with the JFKA, most people have no awareness whatsoever of this vast body of material. They glean their minimal understanding from the mainstream media and perhaps the occasional program on the Discovery Channel or video on YouTube. They either think the UFO phenomenon, like JFKA conspiracy theorizing, is all nonsense or they have some vague notion that “there must be something to it” but they don’t really know or care what this might be.

This near-complete lack of awareness is evident on this thread. For many, the term UFO conjures up nothing but images of wacky folks who think “space aliens” are visiting the planet in motherships and saucers from Zeta Reticuli and the Pleiades.

When the vast body of UFO material is viewed in the context of the latest thinking in the areas of physics, cosmology and consciousness, it becomes fascinating. Some of the more sophisticated UFO theories no longer seem nearly as far “out there” as they once did. As we see on this thread, however, most people have no clue. It’s all just “space aliens.”

As with the JFKA and every other area of weirdness and religion, the UFO community is absolutely plagued with hoaxsters, fraudsters, fast-buck artists, nutcase cultists, and folks deep in the grip of the conspiracy-prone mindset or even genuine mental illness. Indeed, in my opinion based on long experience and observation both the UFO and JFKA communities are dominated by these characters. (Don't come unglued, CTers. I'm talking about the LN side as well.) One has to work to find the serious and worthy-of-consideration aspect of either subject and separate the wheat from the chaff.

I find it slightly humorous that folks who think the JFKA is worth vast amounts of their time are so utterly clueless and cavalierly dismissive of a phenomenon that is potentially vastly more significant. We can’t all be equally informed about (or even interested in) everything, of course, but the knee-jerk dismissiveness by JFKA folks who obviously have no clue what they are talking about insofar as the UFO phenomenon is concerned is really kind of astonishing and vaguely humorous (or perhaps pathetic).

But on it goes, and always will.

I'll make the same challenge to you that I have made numerous times to the CT community over the past several decades. I have challenged them to provide an alternative explanation of the assassination and their supporting evidence. Few even tried and the few who did were easily shot down. If you think these UFO sightings have a "non-mundane" explanation, tell us what you think that explanation is and what your supporting evidence is. Until somebody can do that, I will continue to believe these sightings have a mundane explanation even if we don't yet know what that explanation is.
65
You are spot on with this. This is legit but what exactly is it.

I grew up around Malmstrom AFB and UFO's were a constant subject with all the ICBM's in the area. One UFO was seen over a legion Baseball game in mid-day by a large group of people.

A AF security detail recently testified to Congress about one encounter and can be read online.

In the same sentence with UFO's were cattle mutilations. Both are very real and seem to go hand in hand with no explanation.

To me these accounts are in the same category as crop circles which for a while confounded people including some in the scientific community until somebody showed how easy it was to create these circles with boards tether to a rope attached to a center point. I don't hear much about crop circles any more. Once the trick was revealed, the explanation was far more mundane than what had been speculated.
66
There were two themes that I hammered on at the Ed Forum to howls of protest: (1) the large body of psychological and sociological studies and literature that has accumulated over the past 20 years concerning the distinct conspiracy-prone mindset, and (2) the near-exact parallels between the UFO phenomenon and the JFKA and their respective communities of researchers, hobbyists and cultists.

No less a legend in his own mind than Jim DiEugenio said that my UFO analogy was the single most irritating thing about me for him. UFO believers are all wackos, you see, while he is a serious historian (albeit one who exemplifies the conspiracy-prone mindset to the nth degree).

I happen to think the UFO phenomenon is far, far more significant than the JFKA. It has the potential to alter our understanding of our place in the universe and even of the very nature of reality. If the LN narrative is correct, the JFKA is no more significant than the McKinley assassination. If certain conspiracy theories are correct, the JFKA might tell us something about the subsequent history and current state of the country – but not much, and pretty much nothing we couldn’t have figured out without worrying about the JFKA.

Like it or not, a truly vast body evidence, scientific studies and serious theorizing concerning the UFO phenomenon has accumulated over the past 75 or so years. Much of it has little or nothing to do with “space aliens,” and serious theories are all over the map. Even versions of the ET hypothesis are far more sophisticated and plausible than "space aliens" in nuts-and-bolts craft.

As with the JFKA, most people have no awareness whatsoever of this vast body of material. They glean their minimal understanding from the mainstream media and perhaps the occasional program on the Discovery Channel or video on YouTube. They either think the UFO phenomenon, like JFKA conspiracy theorizing, is all nonsense or they have some vague notion that “there must be something to it” but they don’t really know or care what this might be.

This near-complete lack of awareness is evident on this thread. For many, the term UFO conjures up nothing but images of wacky folks who think “space aliens” are visiting the planet in motherships and saucers from Zeta Reticuli and the Pleiades.

When the vast body of UFO material is viewed in the context of the latest thinking in the areas of physics, cosmology and consciousness, it becomes fascinating. Some of the more sophisticated UFO theories no longer seem nearly as far “out there” as they once did. As we see on this thread, however, most people have no clue. It’s all just “space aliens.”

As with the JFKA and every other area of weirdness and religion, the UFO community is absolutely plagued with hoaxsters, fraudsters, fast-buck artists, nutcase cultists, and folks deep in the grip of the conspiracy-prone mindset or even genuine mental illness. Indeed, in my opinion based on long experience and observation both the UFO and JFKA communities are dominated by these characters. (Don't come unglued, CTers. I'm talking about the LN side as well.) One has to work to find the serious and worthy-of-consideration aspect of either subject and separate the wheat from the chaff.

I find it slightly humorous that folks who think the JFKA is worth vast amounts of their time are so utterly clueless and cavalierly dismissive of a phenomenon that is potentially vastly more significant. We can’t all be equally informed about (or even interested in) everything, of course, but the knee-jerk dismissiveness by JFKA folks who obviously have no clue what they are talking about insofar as the UFO phenomenon is concerned is really kind of astonishing and vaguely humorous (or perhaps pathetic).

But on it goes, and always will.

I find it far more probable that the various UFO witnesses have simply misinterpreted what they thought they saw than that these sightings are a game changer for our understanding of astrophysics.
67
There were two themes that I hammered on at the Ed Forum to howls of protest: (1) the large body of psychological and sociological studies and literature that has accumulated over the past 20 years concerning the distinct conspiracy-prone mindset, and (2) the near-exact parallels between the UFO phenomenon and the JFKA and their respective communities of researchers, hobbyists and cultists.

No less a legend in his own mind than Jim DiEugenio said that my UFO analogy was the single most irritating thing about me for him. UFO believers are all wackos, you see, while he is a serious historian (albeit one who exemplifies the conspiracy-prone mindset to the nth degree).

I happen to think the UFO phenomenon is far, far more significant than the JFKA. It has the potential to alter our understanding of our place in the universe and even of the very nature of reality. If the LN narrative is correct, the JFKA is no more significant than the McKinley assassination. If certain conspiracy theories are correct, the JFKA might tell us something about the subsequent history and current state of the country – but not much, and pretty much nothing we couldn’t have figured out without worrying about the JFKA.

Like it or not, a truly vast body evidence, scientific studies and serious theorizing concerning the UFO phenomenon has accumulated over the past 75 or so years. Much of it has little or nothing to do with “space aliens,” and serious theories are all over the map. Even versions of the ET hypothesis are far more sophisticated and plausible than "space aliens" in nuts-and-bolts craft.

As with the JFKA, most people have no awareness whatsoever of this vast body of material. They glean their minimal understanding from the mainstream media and perhaps the occasional program on the Discovery Channel or video on YouTube. They either think the UFO phenomenon, like JFKA conspiracy theorizing, is all nonsense or they have some vague notion that “there must be something to it” but they don’t really know or care what this might be.

This near-complete lack of awareness is evident on this thread. For many, the term UFO conjures up nothing but images of wacky folks who think “space aliens” are visiting the planet in motherships and saucers from Zeta Reticuli and the Pleiades.

When the vast body of UFO material is viewed in the context of the latest thinking in the areas of physics, cosmology and consciousness, it becomes fascinating. Some of the more sophisticated UFO theories no longer seem nearly as far “out there” as they once did. As we see on this thread, however, most people have no clue. It’s all just “space aliens.”

As with the JFKA and every other area of weirdness and religion, the UFO community is absolutely plagued with hoaxsters, fraudsters, fast-buck artists, nutcase cultists, and folks deep in the grip of the conspiracy-prone mindset or even genuine mental illness. Indeed, in my opinion based on long experience and observation both the UFO and JFKA communities are dominated by these characters. (Don't come unglued, CTers. I'm talking about the LN side as well.) One has to work to find the serious and worthy-of-consideration aspect of either subject and separate the wheat from the chaff.

I find it slightly humorous that folks who think the JFKA is worth vast amounts of their time are so utterly clueless and cavalierly dismissive of a phenomenon that is potentially vastly more significant. We can’t all be equally informed about (or even interested in) everything, of course, but the knee-jerk dismissiveness by JFKA folks who obviously have no clue what they are talking about insofar as the UFO phenomenon is concerned is really kind of astonishing and vaguely humorous (or perhaps pathetic).

But on it goes, and always will.

You are spot on with this. This is legit but what exactly is it.

I grew up around Malmstrom AFB and UFO's were a constant subject with all the ICBM's in the area. One UFO was seen over a legion Baseball game in mid-day by a large group of people.

A AF security detail recently testified to Congress about one encounter and can be read online.

In the same sentence with UFO's were cattle mutilations. Both are very real and seem to go hand in hand with no explanation.
68
Why did your comment exclude Jean Hill?


Jean Hill actually witnessed the shooting even though not everything she said was spot on. Hoffman and Oliver were frauds.
69
The day after the assassination, about 24 hours later, LBJ calls Hoover for an update on the investigation. Hoover is confused and provides LBJ, even about a day later, with astonishingly incorrect information.

Like this (he tells LBJ that Oswald killed a police officer during a gun battle in the theater):



Transcript is here: https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/lbjlib/phone_calls/Nov_1963/html/LBJ-Nov-1963_0029a.htm

There clearly was a lot of confusion and speculation in those first 24 hours, because all sorts of people in law enforcement were making statements that simply did not match the actual facts and/or each other. Hoover was clearly misinformed. What is surprising and highly irresponsible is that he just passed on this unverified and incorrect information to Johnson. He should have known better or, alternatively, he had an agenda of his own.

70
Good Posting Steve !

  I have never read this conversation with Hoover and LBJ before about the handgun and the rifle . Could you point me toward the conversation between Hoover and LBJ about this exchange the two had on the phone about the two guns . With the files that have not been released , I think we will never find out the scenario that took place involving the assassination . Between JFK , MLK , RFK , Malcolm X ,OKC Murrah Bldg. and 911 we are in an area that we might not ever know what really happened .
 Thanks Steve
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10