Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10
61
I'm not gonna reinvent the wheel, i'm gonna make a fake company to buy it. maybe. i don't know.
62
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: A flaw in the movie Executive Action
« Last post by Martin Weidmann on September 21, 2026, 08:33:22 PM »
"Not inaccurate"? That's a double negative. That implies I thought it was accurate.

Nothing in that movie was accurate except for JFK getting killed. The rest was make believe.

Nothing in that movie was accurate except for JFK getting killed.

It's offering an alternative scenario... like you are always asking for.

The rest was make believe.

And you know this, how?

You just believe another fairytale. right?
63
Sam Kinney driver of the follow up car heard the same as bowers Pow.........Pow...Pow

And some people heard evenly spaced shots and others who thought the first two were closer together.
64
i would want to acquire the Dale Myers 3D recreation but that isn't really free. Plus, even if you had the money, you wouldn't be able to get it, unless we form a conspiracy of our own to make a fake company and license all those films and stuff and leak them.

Why do you want to reinvent the wheel?
65
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: How Do LNers Deal With Givens?
« Last post by Martin Weidmann on September 21, 2026, 08:30:23 PM »
Why would you believe Arnold made a mental note of what time she saw Oswald? Nothing would have seemed less important at the time. She wasn't sure where or when she had seen Oswald. Why would she have been?

Which still doesn't rule out the possibility that she did in fact see Oswald.
66
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: A flaw in the movie Executive Action
« Last post by John Corbett on September 21, 2026, 08:29:59 PM »

So you are saying Trumbo's right-wing conspiracy to kill Kennedy in 'Executive Action' was not inaccurate?...

"Not inaccurate"? That's a double negative. That implies I thought it was accurate.

Nothing in that movie was accurate except for JFK getting killed. The rest was make believe.
67
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: How Do LNers Deal With Givens?
« Last post by John Corbett on September 21, 2026, 08:27:37 PM »

I tried working out a plausible solution but it requires that Oswald’s original plan was to shoot from the window at 12:15, that he transported the rifle multiple times in the bag ( yet only 2 prints on bag?) that he got spooked seeing BRW at the other SE window, that Oswald hid the rifle in bag again, went all the way down to 2nd floor lunchroom to be seen maybe at 12:17 by Carolyn Arnold , then a few minutes later , Oswald regained his nerve and went back up , took rifle in bag to NW corner , saw BRW still at the SE window. Then Oswald hid somewhere to hide until  BRW finally left 6th floor  at 12:23 using the elevator. Then Oswald has only about 2 minutes to arrange those 3 boxes , placing one on  the window ledge at that particular Angle ( he had to get the box on the window ledge before film started)  And he did all that without being heard by Harold Norman on the 5th floor room right beneath him. (Norman and Jarman were at their windows by 12:23)  And Dougherty neither saw  nor heard ANY of this activity.  ???

Why would you believe Arnold made a mental note of what time she saw Oswald? Nothing would have seemed less important at the time. She wasn't sure where or when she had seen Oswald. Why would she have been?
68
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Acoustic Evidence
« Last post by John Corbett on September 21, 2026, 08:23:57 PM »
This is not worth answering. These are just more of your inane, unserious, disingenuous arguments.

Translation: MTG has no rebuttal to the points made.
69
I think it is clear beyond any reasonable doubt that Humes was deliberately misrepresenting the back wound's location in his CE 385 SBT diagram. He surely knew this was not even close to what he had seen. If you compare the autopsy photo of the back wound with CE 385, it is obvious that Humes mislocated the wound at least 2.5 inches higher than where the photo shows it.

The evidence that the back wound was clearly below the throat wound is truly extensive and impressive. For example:

Comparing the autopsy photo of the back wound to the left profile view shows this is a false claim.
https://www.svtperformance.com/attachments/kennedyautopsy3s-jpg.1226051/
https://ochelli.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-26-at-15-08-39-The-Kennedy-Autopsy-Minute-by-Minute-The-Kennedy-Autopsy-Minute-by-Minute-1.pdf.png

The back wound is only about 3 inches below the creases on the back of JFK's neck while the left profile view shows the exit wound in the front of the throat is considerably lower than that.

Once again, MTG relies on a long ago debunked myth.
70
So presuming all the above sources posted by MTG are reasonably accurate , then there is one wound in the JFK back right where we see it in the one autopsy photo ( looks below shoulder line to me) which had no exit and then there is one entrance wound in JFK throat that also had no exit ?

Now I’m certainly open to this possibility  but I’m having trouble figuring out what type  weapons and what type projectiles cause each wound and why none of those projectiles were seen embedded in flesh or documents showing they were removed. And where each of these gunmen were located relative to the JFK limo on Elm st ?

Dissolving darts or small pellets  containing cyanide? Umbrella man and his CIA dart gun umbrella is improbable imo and more likely he and DC man were meant to distract tge SS agents to focus on them. That is IF either or both were conspirators vs simply being protestors)

Many bullets enter bodies without exiting. This is not uncommon.

The back-wound bullet clearly did not come from the sixth-floor window -- it came came at the wrong time and at the wrong angle to have come from that window. The shot may have been a misfire from a lower floor of the Dal-Tex Building (Harold Weisberg identified photographic evidence that suggests a gunman was firing from a lower floor that building), or it may have been a large fragment from the bullet that hit the pavement behind the limo early in the shooting (the small back-of-head bullet fragments could only have come from this bullet).   

The throat-wound missile ranged downward into the chest, as indicated by the damage described by Dr. Perry and Dr. Clark. This projectile may have been a fragment of glass from the bullet that made the hole in the windshield (eight witnesses saw the hole, and one of them -- a police officer -- even stuck a pencil through it).

I recommend reading Dr. David Mantik's extensive analysis of the back wound and the throat wound in his recent book The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy: The Final Analysis.
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10