Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10
61
The Dems on TV yesterday looked miserable at the announcement of the potential end of the Iran war.  They so badly wanted the US to become mired in another Vietnam hoping that it harmed Trump regardless of the consequences to the US and world.  The stock market is soaring.  The gas prices will drop like a rock.  Inflation is already much lower than under Biden but still too high but that will be coming down.  Dems hate it.  Only one thing concerns them.  Staying in power.

   The gas prices are like the egg prices were. The Press harps on it, and then Trump makes it go away, and they then move onto something else. The gas price issue is ridiculous as there are still a lot of us that remember back in the 70's, when you could Not even find a gas station with gas at Any price. The Press is rigged just like the Calif Elections. And again, WHO green lighted the AP "calling" elections or candidates that qualify for runoffs? The AP has been just another propaganda arm for the Dem party for a while now. Like NPR was before Trump cut their huevos off. 
62
Try to focus.   You seem to be under the influence of some type of TDS propaganda.  The shooter had a direct line of sight.  There was nothing between him and Trump.  So what hit Trump if not the bullet?  Why don't you believe a bullet can graze someone's ear instead of going through it?  Good grief.

I don't know what hit him.

A bullet from an Ar-15 travels at 3200 ft per sec
A bullet that close, of that high velocity, slices cleanly through cartilage and skin
The shockwave  produces intense sound levels (up to 190 dB) - that fracture an eardrum

These are facts
 :D try to focus

63
Scraped or struck by a bullet at 3,200 feet per second?
 :D Perhaps you're the deranged one.

I asked AI:

A bullet traveling at ~ 3200 ft/s (supersonic) that grazes your ear acts like a high-speed scalpel. The physical impact, massive transfer of kinetic energy, and the severe acoustic shockwave create three distinct types of trauma:

Cartilage and Tissue Damage: The high velocity slices cleanly through cartilage and skin rather than taking the whole ear off, leaving a trough or an incised hole similar to a hole punch. Because the ear has a dense network of blood vessels, the wound will bleed profusely.

Acoustic Trauma: The bullet breaks the sound barrier, generating a miniature sonic boom (a ballistic N-wave). This shockwave, combined with the muzzle blast, produces intense sound levels (up to 190 dB). A miss this close to the head is virtually guaranteed to rupture the eardrum and cause permanent, acute sensorineural hearing loss.

Temporary Cavitation: Though the ear has low density, the rapid transfer of kinetic energy displaces surrounding fluids and tissue, forcing surrounding tissue to stretch and snap back, which can cause lingering bruising and localized necrosis.

Try to focus.   You seem to be under the influence of some type of TDS propaganda.  The shooter had a direct line of sight.  There was nothing between him and Trump.  So what hit Trump if not the bullet?  Why don't you believe a bullet can graze someone's ear instead of going through it?  Good grief. 
64
What Lutz's demonstration showed is that a spent shell could be dented when rapidly ejected from the rifle. It's a little unreasonable to expect Lutz to replicate the exact amount of force Oswald did and produce the same dent.
65
The Dems on TV yesterday looked miserable at the announcement of the potential end of the Iran war.  They so badly wanted the US to become mired in another Vietnam hoping that it harmed Trump regardless of the consequences to the US and world.  The stock market is soaring.  The gas prices will drop like a rock.  Inflation is already much lower than under Biden but still too high but that will be coming down.  Dems hate it.  Only one thing concerns them.  Staying in power.
66
The second sentence was an overstatement on my part. Fred Litwin and Gerry Down are willing to read any and all pro-conspiracy research. Mitch Todd is willing to read some pro-conspiracy research--in fact, he has twice caught me making substantial errors. Gerry Down is the most credible lone-gunman theorist I've encountered, followed at something of a distance by Fred Litwin. Fred has presented a number of valid criticisms of the Jim Garrison investigation and the defenses of Garrison written by DiEugenio, Davy, and Mellen.

The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

Anyone who has not caught MTG making substantial errors needs to make an appointment with Dr. William Niederhut, Harvard-trained psychiatrist, for in-depth counseling.
67
One wonders why Veronica doesn't post some of her "real" research and show us what it looks like? I don't know if someone named Veronica can have a hard-on (these days, quite possibly I suppose), but Veronica certainly seems to have a hard-on for certain folks. I would scarcely put Ben and He Who Shall Not Be Named Because He's On Ignore in the same boat. Besides, if "real" research were the criterion at any forum, let alone this one, the internet would go dark. Veronica appears not to grasp that internet forums, and especially JFKA forums, are Monty Python Skits.
68
I've noticed in the few days since the announcement that the Ed Forum was posted, there have been a number of names posting here that I hadn't seen before. I'm guessing these are people who have migrated from the Ed Forum.
Yes, but the Ed Forum is back up until at least June 20, so now they have a few more days to feed their JFKA addiction at that vastly superior site. I certainly hope no Serious Wackos migrate and alter the folksy charm of this place.
69
Just to state the obvious: The dent and the firing pin impression are two different issues. The dent is WHY CE 543 would have been used as a dry-firing round. It couldn't be reloaded and had no value.
70
You are absolutely correct, but no lone-gunman theorist here will admit it, no matter how much evidence you present that proves it. As far as I can tell, they can't even bring themselves to read the evidence.

The second sentence was an overstatement on my part. Fred Litwin and Gerry Down are willing to read any and all pro-conspiracy research. Mitch Todd is willing to read some pro-conspiracy research--in fact, he has twice caught me making substantial errors. Gerry Down is the most credible lone-gunman theorist I've encountered, followed at something of a distance by Fred Litwin. Fred has presented a number of valid criticisms of the Jim Garrison investigation and the defenses of Garrison written by DiEugenio, Davy, and Mellen.
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10