JFK Assassination Forum

Surely, these are not all original observations by the author(?) The one above, for example, seems to be from an Itek report.

So who found the bag in its alleged position laying folded on the floor of the SN as the reconstruction photo outline indicates?
So who found the jacket alleged to be laying under a car?
So why does  a jacket that’s carried by an officer in the photo appear as white as the white car in the background? Was the car light gray also?
So why was CE 163 , the blue gray jacket found in the TSBD Domino room?
So why did Whaley the taxi driver indicate that Oswald was wearing at least one jacket?
So why did McWatters  the bus driver say that the man he gave the ticket to was wearing a jacket? 
So where on CE 142 or CE 626 (the 2 WC photos of the bag after processed for prints by Latona  is the palm print? Please SHOW ME WHERE in those photos ,where  the  2 prints found are indicated by some mark or outline?

RS:  I am talking about the dirt road portion of the Elm St Extension.

So why did you bring up the limo turn and traffic signal in the Wegman film?

there are NO BOLLARDS between Officer Harkness and this alleged motorcycle cop.

Yes there are! Not only can you see many of them in the Darnell film, others are made obvious when the motorcycle cop walks behind them.

Here, bollards are outlined in red. Note that one is in Harkness' shadow:


Here, "B" marks where the line of bollards is. You can see that two of them are silhouetted by the MC as he walks behind them:


Here he is a half step later:

Bob Harris is a JFK researcher and author that can be seen on You Tube and various websites.

I wonder about John Corbett, came out of nowhere in discussions like he's always been here. 

The dream team had a lot of events go there way, like as you say moving the trial out of Brentwood, the incompetence of the prosecution, letting OJ try on the glove was a disaster and the omitting of major evidence like the suicide note, the bronco chase and a large amount of the domestic violence, did them no favours. I also remember they let the jury have an excursion out to OJ's house and they changed the many photos of OJ with white celebrities/politicians and exchanged them for ones more racially accommodating. And all this was in the shadow of Rodney King and having a predominantly black jury who was played to, all made a guilty plea virtually impossible.
I think if OJ was found guilty, the riots and property damage that happened afterwards would have made the Rodney King riots seem like an afternoon picnic, which makes me believe that perhaps the trial being moved and the general incompetence of the prosecution was maybe Planned? I know it makes me a conspiracy theorist, heaven forbid, but avoiding a billion dollars worth of damage and countless deaths perhaps wasn't a bad idea. And they probably knew OJ would somehow get himself into trouble and face jail and funnily enough that's what happened!

I believe this was Cochran's painting that was planted in OJ's house for the Jury to see.



JohnM