Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10
61

  You are going ostrich and ignoring the solid timelines of Officer Harkness and Buddy Walthers. Both of which Darnell filmed with this "Unknown Motorcycle Cop".
 The LN's understand the conspiracy ramifications of my fact based work. Hence, the totally unfounded claim of Haygood going deep into the railroad yard for a 2nd time. I have never seen anything so absurdly knee-jerk outta them. But, this is what you get with a ground breaking fact based discovery. "That Ain't Haygood" is rippling through the LN Community as we speak. And the conspiracy crowd is also now involved. Just so you ostrich's know. 
62

  Personally, I believe if Oswald had been standing back there, Buell Frazier would have seen him. Frazier does not remember seeing him back there. Also, that landing was very shallow on 11/22/63. It has been changed since then and is deeper today. Back then, the shallowness of that landing would have put a recognizable figure like Oswald in Frazier's peripheral vision at the slightest (R) turn of his head. Frazier trained Oswald, drove him home weekly, etc. He would have remembered seeing Oswald, if even at a quick glance.
  Going to Dealey Plaza today and thinking you are seeing it as it was on 11/22/63, is like viewing the movie "JFK" and thinking ALL of the film footage was shot on 11/22/63 film. You're being misled by both. 
63
 Thumb1: Still, no reason to think the rifle was ever broken down and put into that bag.
64
Every time I ring my bell, you salivate like Pavlov's dog!



JohnM

Did somebody mention delusion of grandeur?

Still desperately trying to turn this fiasco around, I see! Thanks for the laugh and keep 'm coming!
65
A sane person would have let it go, but not Johnny....

He thinks he's being nasty, but all he really is, is an easily triggered fool with a delusion of grandeur complex.

Keep responding, Johnny. I can do with a good laugh

Every time I ring my bell, you salivate like Pavlov's dog!



JohnM
66
Too bad the bag didn't go to Washington Friday night.

Jim Marrs:
"When the Dallas evidence was shipped to the FBI laboratory early on November 23, there was no mention of the paper bag.
Instead, Dallas FBI agent-in-charge J. Gordon Shanklin mentioned the blanket, which he suggested was used to carry the
rifle into the Depository.
"

https://web.archive.org/web/20120502231526im_/http://www.giljesus.com/stovall_A.JPG

Jim Marrs??

You've got to be joking? ???

Mr. EISENBERG. If there are no further questions on the shirt, I will move on to another item.
Mr. Stombaugh, I now hand you a homemade paper bag, Commission Exhibit 142, which parenthetically has also received another Exhibit No. 626, and ask you whether you are familiar with this item?
Mr. STOMBAUGH. Yes; I am.
Mr. EISENBERG. Does that have your mark on it?
Mr. STOMBAUGH. At the time I examined this, it was to be treated for latent fingerprints subsequent to my examination, and in a case like this I will not put a mark on the item itself because my mark might cover a latent fingerprint which is later brought up, and therefore obscure it.
In this particular instance, I made a drawing of this bag on my notes with the various sizes and description of it to refresh my memory at a later date.
Mr. EISENBERG. And it is--looking at those notes and as you remember now-- this is the bag?
Mr. STOMBAUGH. This is the bag.
Mr. EISENBERG. Now, this bag has an area of very light-brown color, and the greater portion of the area is a quite dark-brownish color. What was the color when you originally received it?
Mr. STOMBAUGH. When I originally received this it was a light-brown color.
Mr. EISENBERG. Which is at one end of the bag?
Mr. STOMBAUGH. One end of the bag.
Mr. EISENBERG. The tape is also two colors, one a lightish brown and the other a darkish brown. What color was the tape when you received it?
Mr. STOMBAUGH. The tape also was light brown.
Mr. EISENBERG. Could you turn the bag over? Was it the color that shows as a lighter yellowish-type of brown?
Mr. STOMBAUGH. Yes; a yellow-brown shade.
Mr. EISENBERG. When did you receive it, by the way, Mr. Stombaugh?
Mr. STOMBAUGH. This was received on November 23, 7:30 a.m, 1963.










JohnM
67
Do you think all of the evidence against Oswald in the Tippit Case was fabricated and planted, too?

Or was some of it just more "weird coincidence"?

I see you are running away as fast as you can from the white/grey jacket questions. One can only wonder why, but it's really no surprise.

What evidence in de Tippit case are you talking about?
68
:D ;D :D ;D :D ;D :D ;D :D ;D :D ;D :D ;D

A sock puppet among us?
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,4306.0.html

JohnM

A sane person would have let it go, but not Johnny....

He thinks he's being nasty, but all he really is, is an easily triggered fool with a delusion of grandeur complex.

Keep responding, Johnny. I can do with a good laugh
69
Thanks David, in researching that photo, I was just on your site earlier today and saw that you discovered that little gem and was going to post it here to further educate Capasse.
Anyway, to anyone who's reading this, CT's and LNers alike and want to investigate, research and learn some interesting JFKA facts go and enjoy DVP's excellent site!!
https://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/

JohnM



 :D too bad you just cannot prove where the bag is
70
You mean James Cadigan, the same James Cadigan that examined Oswald's rifle bag at the FBI Laboratory in WASHINGTON, you know on the other side of the Country!

JohnM

Did the bag go to Washington Friday night?
 Thumb1: I don't think it did

Jim Marrs:
"When the Dallas evidence was shipped to the FBI laboratory early on November 23, there was no mention of the paper bag.
Instead, Dallas FBI agent-in-charge J. Gordon Shanklin mentioned the blanket, which he suggested was used to carry the
rifle into the Depository.
"

https://web.archive.org/web/20120502231526im_/http://www.giljesus.com/stovall_A.JPG
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10