Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10
61
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: U.S. And International Politics
« Last post by Royell Storing on Yesterday at 02:36:56 PM »

   California is clearly displaying that it is nothing more than "Cuba West". Fair and Free Elections do Not happen in California or Cuba. How on Earth can Calif post a "Total Votes Counted %", when they admit to Not Knowing how many voted ballots are still in the mail with election day postmarks? This is mathematically Impossible. This is like giving a MLB player a "batting average", without knowing how many Official "AT BATS" the player has accumulated. This is mathematically impossible.
    I closely followed the County-by-County Calif tabulations on election night. I did this until 54% of the ballots had been counted. In NOT 1 single County across the entire state did Hilton trail by a 2-1 margin. The same goes for Pratt in the city of LA. And Calif claims that 80% of their TOTAL VOTES cast are cast by mail. This means that 80% of the 54% counted ballots on Election Night were MAILED IN BALLOTS. Yet in Not 1 county, was Hilton being defeated by a 2-1 margin. Now, all of the sudden, they are claiming that Hilton and Pratt are Losing the mail-in-ballots by better than a 2-1 Margin? And this is AFTER 54% of the total votes had already been counted? 80% of these already counted ballots being Mail In Ballots. This is a National Election Rigging Attempt. What we are seeing unfold on a daily basis is Mathematically Impossible. There can Not be a "% Counted" number, without knowing how many voted ballots were/are "in the mail'. Mathematically Impossible.
.
.
62
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: William Niedernut and Low Follies at Education Forum-JFKA
« Last post by Mark Ulrik on Yesterday at 02:29:09 PM »
Quote from: John Corbett on Yesterday at 12:11:39 PM
9/11 truthers and moon landing deniers should be lumped together with flat earthers. None of them have the sense they were born with.

Yes, but at least they're pretty harmless compared to Trump voters.
63
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: A Car, A Garden, And A Coupla Guys
« Last post by John Corbett on Yesterday at 02:22:11 PM »
Quote from: Royell Storing on Yesterday at 01:26:56 PM
At this point in time on 11/22/63, the DPD would not be dedicating this coordinated "effort" to a 1958 run-of-the-mill auto was simply parked in a "NO PARKING At Any Time" zone. This was a now abandoned "getaway" car and the DPD knew it.

If the DPD knew that, why didn't they impound it?
64
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: What's in a pronoun?
« Last post by Mark Ulrik on Yesterday at 02:13:50 PM »
Quote from: Lance Payette on Yesterday at 01:43:04 PM
Propinquity, it's all propinquity. Or as we say when we visit Denmark, "nærhed." No, I think we'll keep saying propinquity even when we visit Denmark.

You plan on returning?

65
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: CTers: Do yourself a favor and focus on plausibility
« Last post by John Corbett on Yesterday at 02:12:52 PM »
It is absurd to think any shooting can be perfectly replicated because there are so many variables involved. For starters, you would need to shoot the same two men who were originally shot, have them in precisely the same position they were in at the time the single bullet struck, and have the shot placed precisely where the original shot struck. Good luck with that. Any deviation is going to produce different results. Elements of the SBT can be tested and have been. We know the 6.5mm round fired by Oswald's Carcano is capable of penetrating 3 feet of pine board as demonstrated for the PBS Nova program by the father/son ballistics team of Luke and Michael Haag. The also showed that a Carcano bullet passing through ballistic gel simulating human flesh will predictably tumble upon exit. This explains why the nose of the bullet was not severely damaged because it was the base of the bullet which was flattened.

You aren't focusing on plausibility when you expect a shooting to be perfectly replicated.
66
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Undeniable Proof of Fraud: The Impossible JFK Autopsy Brain Photos
« Last post by John Corbett on Yesterday at 02:03:26 PM »
Quote from: Michael T. Griffith on Yesterday at 12:20:06 PM
To follow up on these points for those who have not seen any of the JFK autopsy brain photos, we should understand that the photos show a large laceration (cut) on the right side of the brain, as if someone took a knife and made a nearly straight cut from back to front/front to back just to the right of the midline of the brain, but they show virtually no missing brain tissue.

Dr. Baden's admission that the autopsy brain photos show "less than 1-2 ounces" of missing tissue may even be something of an overstatement. When neurologist Dr. Michael Chesser examined the autopsy brain photos, he could discern virtually no missing tissue.

Crucially, Dr. Chesser also saw (1) no damage whatsoever to the cerebellum except for a “tiny sliver hanging loose” from the bottom of the cerebellum, and (2) no damage to the rear area of the right occipital lobe, yet the rear head entry wound described in the autopsy report would have required the bullet to tear through the top part of the cerebellum and through the rear part of the right occipital lobe.

If one assumes a somewhat upward trajectory for the bullet that hit slightly above the EOP, it could have barely missed the cerebellum, but it could not have missed the rear section of the right occipital lobe. The HSCA forensic experts cited this fact as "incontrovertible" evidence against the autopsy report's placement of the rear head entry wound.

Another powerful point of evidence against the autopsy brain photos, and it's a point I haven't mentioned yet, is that if the righthand temporal-parietal explosion seen in the Zapruder film is authentic, there should be a sizable defect, a sizable area of missing brain tissue, in the right side of the temporal and parietal lobes in the brain photos, but no such defect is there.

It's truly amazing how an amateur such as yourself looking at just the few autopsy photos that were leaked to the public is able to see things that were missed by a panel of some of the most highly regarded forensic medical examiners in the country who had access to all the autopsy photos and x-rays and which were of much higher quality than those that you have seen.
67
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: What's in a pronoun?
« Last post by Mark Ulrik on Yesterday at 01:57:21 PM »
To be clear, I wasn't defending Lane, just wanted to point out that the Reuters story was a bit deceptive in that it shifted perspective from third person (Garrison) to first person (Lane). Clearly, Lane and Garrison were both horrible. Maybe not as horrible as the current POTUS and his henchmen, but still pretty horrible.
68
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: U.S. And International Politics
« Last post by John Corbett on Yesterday at 01:55:26 PM »
Quote from: Tom Graves on Yesterday at 12:40:05 PM
Dear John "Zombified" Corbett,

As was your and Trump's beloved KGB (today's SVR and FSB).

-- Tom

You seem to be patient zero for a new strain of TDS, Putin Derangement Syndrome.
69
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: William Niedernut and Low Follies at Education Forum-JFKA
« Last post by John Corbett on Yesterday at 01:53:35 PM »
Quote from: Lance Payette on Yesterday at 01:39:51 PM
For those who don't know, it is rather humorous: The site is apparently owned in the name of James Gordon, who is literally MIA. Cannot be located, and they don't even know if he's alive. I really liked James and hope he's alive. The funding is through a GoFundMe started by Sandy Larsen, who is definitely not alive, but no one else knows the password. You could hardly make this stuff up. They act like they are paralyzed.

Not unlike what happened to John McAdams' google groups forum, alt.asssassination.jfk. At one time, John had a team of moderators but toward the end he was the only one left. When he died suddenly, nobody else had the keys to the car, which effectively ended new posts being made. Not long afterward, Google quit supporting google groups although the archives are still available for people to look at.
70
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: What's in a pronoun?
« Last post by Lance Payette on Yesterday at 01:43:04 PM »
Propinquity, it's all propinquity. Or as we say when we visit Denmark, "nærhed." No, I think we'll keep saying propinquity even when we visit Denmark.
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10