Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10
61
The woman in the white scarf turns her head to the right.

62


This reminds me one of the arguments I had with Michael Griffith who claimed that the Zapruder film was fake because the crowd on this side of the street were "cardboard cut-outs".

The crowd here can be seen moving all about and straining to get a better look.



And here are the three ladies, with the middle lady clearly clapping and the last lady with the blue head scarf billowing in the wind!   



JohnM
63
   ALEX & ROBIN - Thanks for making this "original scan" of the Wiegman Film available to ALL of us. As the better copies of the Wiegman Film make more and more obvious, there is NO CAR parked alongside the Island in the, "NO PARKING At Any Time" zone near the corner of the Elm St Extension and Elm St. Not Yet!

So Royell, let me get this straight, your missing Wiegman car that was seen about 15 minutes later in Hughes was a getaway car that didn't getaway? Is that right?
Wouldn't a getaway car be prepared and be waiting in advance and considering the Limo was running about 15 minutes late, doesn't that disqualify your entire theory?
If indeed the car did arrive just after Wiegman filmed, couldn't that just be someone who was late to see the parade and simply hung around with the all the other people who were checking out Dealey Plaza and were investigating what happened?
Or do you just have a problem with illegal parking and want to know if the guy/girl got booked for parking in a "NO PARKING At Any Time" zone? LOL!




JohnM
65
Even more evidence.

Here's a recreation of Z222 with the Queen Mary(which was a mistake) and at first I thought this makes the SBF kind of impossible because Connally is obviously too high but thankfully they took two photos and the other was from Zapruder's position and when you compare Zapruder's view with the recreation view it's clear that in the actual Limo, the jump seat is much lower which makes the SBF a no brainer!





JohnM
66
If the WC had the benefit of modern technology and more time to look at blow ups of the Z-frames.  they might have figured out that JFK's right hand was still moving down at Z225 and didn't start upward until Z226, the same frame JBC's arm started up. Coincidence? Hardly.Another example of the WC missing clues because they lacked the technology to do a frame-by-frame study with magnified frames. What they did was create still photos of the magnified frames but that didn't allow them to see the subtle changes from frame to frame like the bulging of JBC's jacket or JFK's hand still moving downward at Z225.

 Thumb1:

The amount of intellectual dishonesty when analysing the SBF is staggering!

1. Connally's jacket is clearly bulging. I've read a lot of denial that suggests this bulge is a shadow?? or at this precise point in time it was a sudden gust of wind which by chance didn't affect anything else? Also note Connally's left shoulder is suddenly lifting as his body is pivoting as he is struck!



2, Kennedy's right hand is at first moving downwards.



3. Then in a fraction of a second, both men are reacting simultaneously and it isn't a coincidence that Connally's right hand, the one that was hit is displaying an involuntary pain reaction.



Here's Gordon Ramsey displaying a similar virtually instantaneous involuntary pain reaction.



JohnM
67
A whole lot of so-and-so-said evidence which is all you've got. It's not at all compelling.Now you have to make excuses for why one of your witnesses got it so wrong. In what universe is a 2 second difference almost simultaneous.
I find it quite a bit more compelling than a missed first shot for which there are not only zero witnesses but over 80 witnesses who say it didn't happen.  You will never find a real case where this has occurred.( And I am not even talking about the improbability of someone deciding to shoot when the target is moving across the field of view after piling boxes for a shot down the street and then missing not only the target but the entire 7 by 21 foot car at 160 feet;  and I will overlook the complete absence of a mark in whatever it was supposed to have hit.)

.
Quote
The other agents were wrong. Being a SS agent doesn't endow somebody with super powers of perception. They are as prone to error as any other witness.Suggest all you want.
On the off-chance you  might want to view the discussion of the second shot, it begins at around the 33 minute mark:


Quote
I did. There's no way for someone I was facing could shoot me in the back. That shoots down your silly theory of JBC being shot at Z271.
The bullet entered at the edge of the right scapula which is the rear border of the armpit and passed throught the fifth rib at the middle of the armpit.  Explain how that happened if he wasn't turned sharply right as Nellie, Gayle Newman and 47 earwitnesses said he was.
68
He knew that JFK had moved.  He mentioned that in his hospital bed interview.  He would also know how difficult it is to miss a target the size of the limousine from anywhere in a place as small as Dealey Plaza.

But JBC doesn’t have to provide that evidence.  There at least 21 witnesses plus another 15 witnesses along Elm St . who put the first shot striking JFK. Then there are the 47 witnesses who recalled the last two shots closer together that further nuke the first shot miss.
A whole lot of so-and-so-said evidence which is all you've got. It's not at all compelling.
Quote

Nellie was no worse a witness than any of the other 20 first shot hit witnesses that you reject.  According to the SBT adherents, all those 80+ witnesses got it completely backward.
Altens did say “almost simultaneously” “a fraction ahead of my picture” in his testimony to the WC but in his wire story written shortly after the events on 22Nov63 he said he heard a noise like fireworks popping and he snapped a picture of the motorcade “at about that time”. The reverberation may have affected his perception of the exact time of the noise.  The WC was suggesting that if he took his photo at the time of a shot that it was the second shot. 
His #5 photo was on Houston just after the turn at Main.
Now you have to make excuses for why one of your witnesses got it so wrong. In what universe is a 2 second difference almost simultaneous.
Quote

His sense of time was a bit peculiar. He thought the shots were quick but estimated the time between first and last to be “less than 30 seconds” (7 H 520).
WOW. Less than 30 seconds. He really zeroed in on it.
Quote

In his 6th Floor interview he said oither agents told him that there was a shot just after he jumped off as he was running beside the QM.
He may have been concentrating on other things when he was running.

The other agents were wrong. Being a SS agent doesn't endow somebody with super powers of perception. They are as prone to error as any other witness.
Quote
 
I suggest that the change in JFK’s head and hand beginning at z193-194 was the beginning of his reaction.
Suggest all you want. Nobody is buying it.
Quote

Because it did not strike bone, he may not have realized what happened and the reaction began with a realization that something was wrong.   It may be that it wasn’t until he tried to breathe about two seconds later that he began struggling to breathe. JBC may have taken about the same time or a bit less to process what he had heard and decide to turn around to see JFK.  So it doesn’t strike me as being unexpected that JBC’s visible reaction began about the time that JFK’s struggling to breathe reaction appeared.
Now you are trying to rationalize. Your theory of what happened isn't the least bit plausible from beginning to end.
Quote
I don’t ignore it at all.  All I am saying is that it is not a reaction to being hit in the back by a bullet. Rather it is a reaction to hearing it and preparing to turn around, which he then does.
Is that what you have convinced yourself of over all these years?
Quote


You ignore the fact that no one said that JBC turned around after the second shot and looked rearward in the 3 seconds following the second shot before laying down?  Hint: maybe it was because he didn’t.
Are you serious? Who needs to be told that is what happened. We can see it with our own eyes. Look at the damn Z271 frame. JBC is looking backward in the direction of Oswald. No way Oswald could shoot him in the back at that frame. It's no wonder you're so mixed up because you base all your beliefs on what people have said instead of looking at the evidence for yourself. The Z-film allows us all to be witnesses to the assassination but you choose to ignore what it is showing us because you want to believe your cockamamie theory instead.
Quote
?? He was trying to get a look JFK, He was sitting on a  low, cramped floor-mounted jump seat. It wasn’t easy to turn around especially since JFK had moved to the left.Without a proper model of a twisted torso the best I can do is ask you to turn around like JBCis at z271 and note the positions of the edge of the right scapula, the fifth rib and the right nipple.
I did. There's no way for someone I was facing could shoot me in the back. That shoots down your silly theory of JBC being shot at Z271.
69
How would JBC have known whether JFK was hit by the first shot or the second.
He knew that JFK had moved.  He mentioned that in his hospital bed interview.  He would also know how difficult it is to miss a target the size of the limousine from anywhere in a place as small as Dealey Plaza.

But JBC doesn’t have to provide that evidence.  There at least 21 witnesses plus another 15 witnesses along Elm St . who put the first shot striking JFK. Then there are the 47 witnesses who recalled the last two shots closer together that further nuke the first shot miss.

Quote
As for Nellie, she didn't get much of anythingu right.JFK and JBC both felt it at the same time and both reacted at the same time when both of them threw their arms upward in perfect unison at Z226. It's no wonder they had a hard time understanding how Oswald could have fired so rapidly AND so accurately if there had been a second shot miss.

Nellie was no worse a witness than any of the other 20 first shot hit witnesses that you reject.  According to the SBT adherents, all those 80+ witnesses got it completely backward.

Quote
This passage shows just how wrong witnesses can be.
" According to Altgens, he snapped the picture "almost simultaneously" with a shot which he is confident was the first one fired."
His photo has been synced to Z255 which isn't even close to the time either the first or second shot was fired. The reality is it was taken 2 seconds after the second shot was fired and hit both men. Altgens statement doesn't even fit your theory that the shots were fired at Z193 and Z271.
Altgens did say “almost simultaneously” “a fraction ahead of my picture” in his testimony to the WC but in his wire story written shortly after the events on 22Nov63 he said he heard a noise like fireworks popping and he snapped a picture of the motorcade “at about that time”. The reverberation may have affected his perception of the exact time of the noise.  The WC was suggesting that if he took his photo at the time of a shot that it was the second shot. 

Quote
I can't find the full set of Altgens photos but it would not surprise me if he actually took photo #5 simultaneously with the first shot, but that's speculation. What isn't speculation is that he got it wrong.
His #5 photo was on Houston just after the turn at Main.

His sense of time was a bit peculiar. He thought the shots were quick but estimated the time between first and last to be “less than 30 seconds” (7 H 520).

Quote
Clint Hill also got it wrong. He only remembers hearing 2 shots. He remembers the shot that hit JFK in the back thinking that was the first shot. He race forward and saw the head shot at what he estimates was 5 seconds. That's pretty close. It was actually 4.9 seconds between the two shots which struck JFK. So which shot didn't he hear.
In his 6th Floor interview he said oither agents told him that there was a shot just after he jumped off as he was running beside the QM.

Quote
An earlier first shot or an intervening shot between the two that hit JFK. It's hard for me to believe he wouldn't have heard an intervening shot between the two which hit JFK.
He may have been concentrating on other things when he was running. 

Quote
So you have JFK reacting to getting shot and JBC reacting to the sound of a shot at precisely the same time and in precisely the same manner, even though according to you that even happened 33 frames, almost 2 seconds earlier.
I suggest that the change in JFK’s head and hand beginning at z193-194 was the beginning of his reaction. Because it did not strike bone, he may not have realized what happened and the reaction began with a realization that something was wrong.   It may be that it wasn’t until he tried to breathe about two seconds later that he began struggling to breathe. JBC may have taken about the same time or a bit less to process what he had heard and decide to turn around to see JFK.  So it doesn’t strike me as being unexpected that JBC’s visible reaction began about the time that JFK’s struggling to breathe reaction appeared.

Quote
You also choose to ignore immediately after his arm flip, JBC doubled over and dipped to his right, then began twisting dramatically in his seat.
I don’t ignore it at all.  All I am saying is that it is not a reaction to being hit in the back by a bullet. Rather it is a reaction to hearing it and preparing to turn around, which he then does. 

You ignore the fact that no one said that JBC turned around after the second shot and looked rearward in the 3 seconds following the second shot before laying down?  Hint: maybe it was because he didn’t.

Quote
And you want to pretend all those gyrations are no in reaction to being shot. Was he anticipating getting shot at 271?
?? He was trying to get a look JFK, He was sitting on a  low, cramped floor-mounted jump seat. It wasn’t easy to turn around especially since JFK had moved to the left.
Quote
How about showing us an ACCURATE drawing of JBC's position at Z271 that show how a bullet could enter his back by his right armpit and exit from the right side of his torso. I know I'll be waiting a long time to see that. Like forever.
Without a proper model of a twisted torso the best I can do is ask you to turn around like JBCis at z271 and note the positions of the edge of the right scapula, the fifth rib and the right nipple.
70
TG--

Started neutral, but based on some on-the-ground facts regarding the physical JFKA, moved into CT camp.

Never bought into extravagant left-wing-Islamo-fascist-KGB narratives regarding JFKA.

James Woolsey's book is informative, but not conclusive.

My guess is small clique involved, likely freelancers with connections to G2, or possibly Alpha 66, although G2'ers had penetrated Alpha 66.

Maybe three people involved in JFKA.
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10