Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10
61
Take notice how this "No Glove Cop" keeps that car between him and Officer Harkness on the Darnell film snippet. Just like the distance he maintained between himself and Officer Roger Craig and Officer Buddy Walthers as they all walked in front of that string of passenger train cars. This alleged cop kept his distance from law enforcement.

Maybe Officer Haygood was paranoiac, as you seem to be.
62
Dear Sonderführer Storing,

Isn't "still frame" kinda redundant?

-- Tom

    How about addressing the facts I have presented? Based on the 12:35 Haygood call from his motorcycle, and the 12:36 call of Harkness as he races around with Amos Euins in tow, the Darnell still frame showing the "No Glove Cop" has to of been taken somewhere around 12:38 - 12:40. The documented times of those 2 police calls prove the "No Glove Cop" is not Officer Haygood. Haygood is supposed to be the only DPD Motorcycle cop in the RR Yard immediately following the Kill Shot. This 'No Glove Cop" proves a conspiracy.
    Take notice how this "No Glove Cop" keeps that car between him and Officer Harkness on the Darnell film snippet. Just like the distance he maintained between himself and Officer Roger Craig and Officer Buddy Walthers as they all walked in front of that string of passenger train cars. This alleged cop kept his distance from law enforcement. 
63
What do you think the level of interest was immediately before Stone's "JFK"? It only takes a "spark" to start a raging fire.

Dear Sonderführer Storing,

Correct.

It only takes a KGB* article published in a communist-owned newspaper three days after Clay Shaw is arrested, on suspicion of having organized a homosexual "thrill-kill" assassination of JFK, by overly ambitious, scandal-plagued, and revengeful Jim Garrison to spark a fire 24 years later via Comrade Stone's self-described mythological ("to counter the myth of the Warren Report") movie, "JFK."

*Today's SVR and FSB


-- Tom
64
At the Ed Forum, there are more 10,000 posts referencing Mexico City.

There are 56 threads with "Mexico City" in the title (12 here).

TG started a thread about Mexico City and the KGB that has 120 posts (about 100 by TG).

Jim DiEugenio started a thread "The KGB and the JFK Case" specifically to deal with TG's KGB stuff ("Since Tommy G has been bouncing all over the forum trying to promote his KGB did it concept, why not give him his own thread?"). It has 369 posts. Suffice it to say, TG's KGB stuff did not fare well among the sages of the Ed Forum.

I'll bet the answer is in there somewhere! Well, more like eight completely irreconcilable "answers," but that's just par for the course in JFKA-ology.

Anyone else picture a gaggle of tiny grandkids at Disneyland with snow cones in their hands tugging at their mother's skirt and pleading, "Mommy, is there some way to make Grandpa Tom stop talking about the KGB all the time everywhere we go? People are starting to stare at us."

Dear Fancy Pants Rants,

I'm sorry that, Traitorous Orange Xxxx-lover that you are, you find it so difficult to deal with anything that might suggest that the KGB* was involved in the JFK assassination -- difficult for you because it suggests that it was a lot more powerful back-in-the-day than you want to believe -- and, despite what your beautiful Byelorussian wife has probably led you to believe -- was still sufficiently powerful in November 2016 as to be able to install your hero, the aforementioned Traitorous Orange Xxxx, as our nation-rending "president" on 20 January 2017.

*Today's SVR and FSB

-- Tom
65
Of course, Tink Thompson will still be there.  :D If you think there will be a JFK Lancer conference 75 years from now, you have a vivid imagination. I'm not holding my breath for the Second Coming, but I'd give shorters odds on that than for a JFK Lancer conference in 2100. At the rate interest in the JFKA is fading, I wouldn't bet $10 on there being one in 2036.

   What do you think the level of interest was immediately before Stone's "JFK"? It only takes a "spark" to start a raging fire. I think it's DiCaprio that bought the rights to the story/book of a cellmate of one of those Mafia crime bosses. He spilled the beans. A movie such as this starring DiCaprio would be no different than Costner and "JFK". Both actors being "boffo" at differing points in time. Also, the subject matter of their movies being secondary at the time of release. The recent DiCaprio flick being a case in point. It immediately gets nominated for Best Pic, lotsa other Oscar nominations, yet the subject matter is Old Hat. This is all it takes to spur interest.   
66
At the Ed Forum, there are more 10,000 posts referencing Mexico City.

There are 56 threads with "Mexico City" in the title (12 here).

TG started a thread about Mexico City and the KGB that has 120 posts (about 100 by TG  ::) ).

Jim DiEugenio started a thread "The KGB and the JFK Case" specifically to deal with TG's KGB stuff ("Since Tommy G has been bouncing all over the forum trying to promote his KGB did it concept, why not give him his own thread?"). It has 369 posts. Suffice it to say, TG's KGB stuff did not fare well among the sages of the Ed Forum.

I'll bet the answer is in there somewhere!  :D Well, more like eight completely irreconcilable "answers," but that's just par for the course in JFKA-ology.

Anyone else picture a gaggle of tiny grandkids at Disneyland with snow cones in their hands tugging at their mother's skirt and pleading, "Mommy, is there some way to make Grandpa Tom stop talking about the KGB all the time everywhere we go? People are starting to stare at us."
67
Oh, good, another topic that has Never Been Discussed Before.

I, of course, did not see TG's posts, but I don't need to. I could write them and the predictable responses from every angle myself.

One of the reasons I mentioned Larry Hancock on Ben's MC thread is that I had just come from a 2022 Ed Forum thread about Larry's latest book that quickly shifted to the predictable debate about MC, replete with photos, varying identifications of the "mystery man," and all the rest.

It's like there is some tape loop that goes round and round and round and round inside the heads of JFKA obsessives, so the MC pops up every two days or so and simply must be discussed.

I've mentioned previously an episode of The Dick Van Dyke Show where Buddy (Morey Amsterdam) explained that Jewish comedians all tell the same jokes so many times, over and over, from the same joke file, that all that one of them needs to do is walk into a roomful of his peers and say "Number 47" - and they all laugh uproariously.

Isn't this EXACTLY what the JFKA community is like?

Dear Fancy Pants Rants,

I'm sorry that, Traitorous Orange Xxxx-lover that you are, you find it so difficult to deal with anything that might suggest that the KGB* was involved in the JFK assassination -- difficult for you because it suggests that it was a lot more powerful back-in-the-day than you want to believe -- and, despite what your beautiful Byelorussian wife has probably led you to believe -- was still sufficiently powerful and omnipresent in 2015 and 2016 as to be able to install your hero, the aforementioned Traitorous Orange Xxxx, as our nation-rending "president" on 20 January 2017.

*Today's SVR and FSB

-- Tom
68
It's crazy to think Alex could still be presenting at JFK Lancer in the year 2100, long after we're all gone. If he were, he'd still be younger than Peter Dale Scott is now.

Of course, Tink Thompson will still be there.  :D If you think there will be a JFK Lancer conference 75 years from now, you have a vivid imagination. I'm not holding my breath for the Second Coming, but I'd give shorter odds on that than for a JFK Lancer conference in 2100. At the rate interest in the JFKA is fading, I wouldn't bet $10 on there being one in 2036.
69
Oh, good, another topic that has Never Been Discussed Before.  ::) ::) ::)

I, of course, did not see TG's posts, but I don't need to. I could write them and the predictable responses from every angle myself.

One of the reasons I mentioned Larry Hancock on Ben's MC thread is that I had just come from a 2022 Ed Forum thread about Larry's latest book that quickly shifted to the predictable debate about MC, replete with photos, varying identifications of the "mystery man," and all the rest.  ::) ::) ::)

It's like there is some tape loop that goes round and round and round and round inside the heads of JFKA obsessives, so the MC pops up every two days or so and simply must be discussed.

I've mentioned previously an episode of The Dick Van Dyke Show where Buddy (Morey Amsterdam) explained that Jewish comedians all tell the same jokes so many times, over and over, from the same joke file, that all that one of them needs to do is walk into a roomful of his peers and say "Number 47" - and they all laugh uproariously.

Isn't this EXACTLY what the JFKA community is like?  ::) ::) ::)
70
It's crazy to think Alex could still be presenting at JFK Lancer in the year 2100, long after we're all gone. If he were, he'd still be younger than Peter Dale Scott is now.
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10