Recent Posts
You are just adding confusion...
That man and his plaid shirt have nothing to do with anything...
Sandy Larsen matched the plaid bars on Lovelady's shirt to those on the shirt of the man going up the extension beyond any reasonable doubt..
I find this very difficult to believe.
If this were true you would have pointed us to this evidence.
It would not surprise me if this turned out to be another of your fantasies but I'm open to being proven wrong.
If you can really provide another clear piece of analysis that shows Lovelady's shirt and that is nothing to do with the Sprague print I will concede that it is Lovelady and Shelley on the Elm Street extension, even though it flies in the face of all other available evidence and appears to be a physical impossibility.
Where can I find Larsen's analysis?
Although I am completely new on the forum, I am not new to the internet. I am not new to childish sarcastic attacks on the truth such as the one that was made above me. Quite the contrary. I have experienced them everywhere on the internet. I have come to expect that whenever I go anywhere and tell the truth about anything, I will be subject to such immature childish attacks, which are actually very revealing about the people making the attacks. For example, the person who attacked me above did not address any of the points I made very eloquently to state why that I believe Jackie is the assassin of her own husband. He just mocked and ridiculed and dissmissed the entire concept of what I was saying without addressing it as a factual possibility at all. I am well accustomed to such tactics. This is not just happening on this forum. It is happening everywhere across the internet. Why is it that truth is hated and mocked and ridiculed in this world and lies and deception and ignorance are promoted so strongly, especially inside America? This topic goes far beyond the JFK assassination. It goes to the heart of what American society is. America is supposed to be the most technically advanced country in the world, and perhaps we are that, but spirtually (which another way of saying truthfully) it is my experience that the American people are the most ignorant and deceived people on earth, who are so brainwashed that they no longer care about truth. Truth to them is what the mass herd of people believe it to be. They do not think for themselves. They do not question. Their minds are like closed boxes and they are unable to think. All they can do is jump on the bandwagon of what someone else has given them to believe. As someone who cares about truth, I am greatly dismayed at what I see in the vast majority of American people. I consider myself a truth sayer who is trying to wake people up, but its almost impossible to wake up most Americans in this day and age. We live in an age of deception, where deception is truth and actual truth is attacked and degraded as "Fake News" and "Conspiracy Theories" to be mocked and ridiculed by such fine people as Jerry Freeman. I find this extremely sad. I do not expect anything I say here to make one bit of a difference in the big scheme of things, but I think it is important to state what I believe to be the truth. Here is the truth about the JFK assassination that goes far beyond the assassination itself: America in 2018 is a very heavily deceived society, where lies are promoted as truth, and actual truth has become lies. American society itself is a lie. It can only continue to exist if the American people believe all the lies they have been told. So the liars and deceivers and mockers and ridiculers are king in American society and people who only want the truth to be known are mocked and belittled and put down. This is the truth and yet I will certainly be mocked and ridiculed even for saying these words by those who hate and despise the truth. As I said before, I am fully willing to back up what I said about the JFK assassination with actual evidence, the Zapruder film itself. I consider it a great and worthy caused to spread truth and back it up with evidence, and let the mockers and ridiculers do what they do best. Of course Jerry Freeman is a Hero Member of this forum. I would expect nothing less.
The man is Weigman and, as you say, he is sprawled across the steps from where he filmed the Hesters. He is just about to get up and race down the knoll to film the Newman's.
The problem is Royell.
I am trying to synchronise various films and photographs to get as good an estimate as possible for how long after the headshot the Darnell footage begins.
Royell has constantly tried to derail these attempts and one of his tactics is to make up nonsense off the top of his head that I then have to prove wrong.
Royell believes that the figure in question is not sprawling across the steps, as is obvious to anyone with half a brain, but that he is running across the knoll towards Zapruder. It is utterly bizarre but he just keeps on insisting this is the case even though the man is not moving and is clearly sprawled across the steps.
I find this very difficult to believe.
If this were true you would have pointed us to this evidence.
It would not surprise me if this turned out to be another of your fantasies but I'm open to being proven wrong.
If you can really provide another clear piece of analysis that shows Lovelady's shirt and that is nothing to do with the Sprague print I will concede that it is Lovelady and Shelley on the Elm Street extension, even though it flies in the face of all other available evidence and appears to be a physical impossibility.
Where can I find Larsen's analysis?
He is sprawled across the steps with just his feet extending beyond onto the grass is the way it looks to me. What’s the problem with thaf?
He is sprawled across the steps with just his feet extending beyond onto the grass is the way it looks to me. What’s the problem with thaf?
Sandy Larsen matched the plaid bars on Lovelady's shirt to those on the shirt of the man going up the extension beyond any reasonable doubt...When I explained to Larsen that he himself had just proven the timing of when Frazier said he was standing and staring in shock at Sarah Stanton Larsen responded by going back to his photo analysis of the plaid bars and deleting it...When I confronted Larsen for that in an e-mail he responded by saying "You and I will never agree"...But that wasn't what I asked him...I didn't ask him if we would ever agree, I asked him if he had proven the timing of when Frazier was facing Sarah Stanton by proving when Lovelady was fast-walking up the extension...The membership of The Education Forum not only allowed Larsen to get away with that rank dishonesty but they also didn't even notice or care when told...That means Sandy was the kind of person who, like DiEugenio, knowingly, with intent, allows an innocent researcher to be unfairly banned for good evidence and doesn't care as long as he prevails...They have Mark Knight always on reserve to make sure the victim is punished and the real issue is ignored...Andrew Iler then role plays being a strict enforcer of highly principled standards - but all he really is is a DiEugenio shill...The Education Forum is a dirty board where the Prayer Man people are always going to be assisted out of their malicious misconduct by dirty moderation...Commit rogue moral violations against good research and good researchers and the clique will praise you right on cue...