Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10
62
What if Lee Harvey Oswald really did smuggle his rifle into the TSBD and shoot JFK all by himself. What would the evidence look like? It would look exactly like the evidence we have available to us.
63
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Oodles and gobs, or just a few?
« Last post by John Corbett on July 31, 2026, 12:15:02 PM »
If they are able to answer the initial question, the follow up question becomes: How do you put together such a massive conspiracy without exposing the plot ahead of time. Think of all the law enforcement officers and government officials that would have to be approached and get on board. Are we supposed to believe all these people were made aware of this plot and every single one of them signed on? All it would take would be for one of these people to blow the whistle on the whole operation. Are we supposed to believe JFK was so universally despised that all these people conspired to kill him? Not one decent person spoke up to stop the assassination from being carried out. Even if one believes that is remotely possible, how would the plotters KNOW they would get 100% cooperation? If they approached even one person who refused to go all, it would have been game over.

The questions also apply if one theorizes all these people got on board the cover up AFTER the assassination. The plotters would have had to know IN ADBANCE that they were going to get 100% cooperation from the people they needed to engineer the cover up. Then they would have to get that 100% cooperation for the cover up to be successful. Not one whistle blower in the whole operation.

I can't decide which of these scenarios is the more ludicrous.
64
Great news: Yesterday I received an email from the new lead moderator of the Education Forum (JFK Assassination Debate) advising me that my ban has been lifted and inviting me to resume posting in the forum. And, William Niederhut is no longer a moderator.

If you see a decrease in the frequency of my posts and replies, it will be because I have resumed posting in the Ed Forum.

Would it make any difference if we begged you to stay?

It will be interesting to see how your Altgens bullet hole theory fares there. That one was a real doozy.
65
[Fauci's] "lifetime achievement" is to be complicit in the deaths of 15 million people. 

You're full of it.
66
If JFK was only struck from the rear, why the "back and to the left" motion of JFK's head?

Maybe due to the fact that he was sitting, wearing a tight corset/back brace, and the right side of his brain was destroyed?
67
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Oodles and gobs, or just a few?
« Last post by Tom Graves on July 31, 2026, 03:59:20 AM »
A question for all the tinfoil-hat JFKA CTs out there:

How many evil, evil, bad guys were involved, altogether, in the planning, the "patsy-ing," the planting of evidence, the shooting, the planting of more evidence, the getting-away, the film-and-photo-and-XRAY-altering, the wound altering, the casket-switching, and the all-important (and obviously ongoing!) cover up?

Oodles and gobs, or just a few?

Oh yeah, and was it Peter Dale Scott's "Deep State," Jimmy DiEugenio's "National Security State," or Steve Bannon's "Deep State" / "Administrative State"?
68
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: The First Shot
« Last post by Andrew Mason on July 31, 2026, 02:22:16 AM »
I asked:

"If you have a single scrap of evidence that CE399 was the bullet recovered from Parkland, do share it."

There is no evidence that CE399 was found at Parkland.
The three men involved with the discovery of a bullet at Parkland ALL refused to identify CE399 as that bullet.
O P Wright categorically denied CE399 was the bullet found at Parkland.
CE399 was entered into evidence as the bullet found at Parkland without a single witness identifying it as such.
Tomlinson, the man who discovered the bullet, wasn't asked to identify it during his closed WC interview.

There is not a single scrap of evidence that CE399 was the bullet found at Parkland and lots of evidence demonstrating it wasn't.
Prix like Graves are here to disinform and misinform.
What an unbelievable KGB-loving loser he is.

Each of the people who took possession of the bullet gave evidence that they retained possession until they delivered it to the next person.  That is evidence that can establish continuity of possession.  Tomlinson found the bullet when it fell from a stretcher. He gave it to Wright who delivered it to SA Johnsen who, in turn, gave it to his superior, Rowley after Johnsen flew with it to Washington on 22Nov63 with the bullet in his possession. Rowley immediately gave it to FBI agent Todd who marked his initials on it.  One cannot expect witnesses to be able to identify the bullet from its appearance. That’s why they put their initials on it. But engineers, managers are not crime scene investigators.  Secret Service agents are not, normally, either.

Besides, Wright snd Tomlinson said in 1964, months after last seeing the bullet, that CE399 resembled the bullet they had received.  But, understandably, they could not make a positive identification.  It was not until 1967 when Josiah Thompson showed him a picture of CE399, that Wright said it did not look like the same bullet.
69
Bill Shelley, face partially obscured by police officer's  is standing to the right of Danny Arce in fifth photo.

Color photo, said to be of Carol Hughes, third from left,

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,4541.msg170344.html#msg170344

More detail on Mrs. John Hughes (Carol) @ link(s) below. My recollection is that she was an older woman, age 27 in 1963, married
to a man still in his teens and was a mother of a very recently born baby, and living with her in-laws.

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,1846.msg49061.html#msg49061

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2175.msg59801.html#msg59801
....
https://www.legacy.com/amp/obituaries/tributes/193828422
Carol Ann Patterson  1936 - 2019
Carol was born on July 1, 1936 and passed away on Wednesday, September 4, 2019.
Published in Batesville on Sep. 5, 2019.
posting someone’s death is honouring their life. who shall post ours when we pass?  and we keep posting about jfk, who is in his grave, with a light on!
70
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: A question for Brian Doyle
« Last post by Mark A. Oblazney on July 31, 2026, 01:49:07 AM »
Pardon me, Mark, but this cannot be ignored. Tommy is wearing his disability on his sleeve. If TDS, vote fraud, antifa, or Biden era "lawfare" actually existed,
Tommy could be a true believer in all of them and still not be as divorced from reality as he is in his suspicion of you, quoted above!

Tommy, regardless your position on the influence of nature vs nurture,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nature_versus_nurture

....Mark has an unrivaled background, either way.
(Mark, I'll delete the text following this line, if you prefer....)

His grandma's obit, which I located, motivated by my own curiousity. In the more than the dozen years I have known Mark, I am confident I would
have had to pry out the details of what shaoed his development, if I had not established a starting point to question him.

https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/143570513/katherine-m-mcandrew

Consider who Mark's grandma's two siblings were, as well as her son, Mark's uncle Bill. A hint... who did Garrison complain to the FCC was not willing
to grant him "equal time"?

Google AI
Google AI :
Mark's first cousin, uncle Bill's daughter.:

Mark was author Leo Damore's researcher. He attempted to talk some sense into Princeton educated psychologist, Peter Janney, son of the personnel director
of the CIA. Obviously Dr. Janney "knew what he knew," and was beyond Mark's fact supported counsel.
Yeah, cousin Mary got hit on the head by a rock thrown towards one of Mayor Daley’s finest.  Gave her some ‘street cred’ lol.  But making matters worse for me was running into Peter’s mom at Hillwood, where my wife was a volunteer. We talked mostly about what was happening underneath the sea, and why we should start there instead of spending so much money in outer space.
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10