Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10
61
And the correct solution does not have to explain every aspect of the Tague wounding. One fact is crystal clear: the lone-gunman theory has no rational, credible way to explain the Tague incident. The least-absurd theory that you can offer is patently ridiculous and utterly unscientific.

This from a guy who has offered no alternative explanation for how the Tague injury occurred. Why don't you give us an alternative theory wo we can compare it to the possibilities that it was caused by one of Oswald's shots. As is the custom for most CTs, you set the bar very high for the LNs and very low for yourself. We are expected to prove every last detail with 100% certainty while you are allowed to speculate while providing no evidence.
Quote

In contrast, I can offer at least two plausible shooting locations from which a bullet could have barely missed JFK's head and then hit the Tague curb. Your only shooting location is the sixth-floor window, from which no bullet could have been fired that had even a remote chance of hitting the Tague curb and causing Tague's wound.

If you can, why don't you.

A number of plausible explanations have been offered for how a shot from Oswald's rifle could have continues down range and struck the curb near Tague. Posner has theorized the bullet hit a tree branch. I don't necessarily believe that but I can't logically refute it either. Others have suggested the bullet struck the traffic arm that the limo passed under. Again, not my theory but possible. I lean toward the first shot missing to the right of the limo, ricocheting off the pavement and continuing down range to toward Tague. I used a Google Earth view of Dealey Plaza and it shows a line from the sniper's nest to where Tague was standing passes through the right lane of Elm St. Still others believe that a lead fragment from the headshot passed over the windshield and continued down range toward Tague. Without knowing the exit velocity of those fragments, it's impossible to say whether or not that was possible.

Now let's see your explanations.
62
I don't need to explain it. You do. You are the one who has postulated that the hole in the turf is a bullet hole. The burden is on you to provide the evidence to support that. You have failed miserably.
All hearsay. Not one of these people is on record as saying they saw a bullet.

And I guess we're supposed to believe that it means nothing that photos show that the man in the suit leaned down, put his hand in the hole, brought his hand upward with the hand cupped, and then put his hand in his pocket.


Tell us who that man was and what he said he found? Cite a source for these alleged photos so we can judge for ourselves what they show.

Garbage - Take it up with the Fort Worth Star Telegram, the picture and caption was in their paper and on their website.
Three witness confirm a bullet in the grass. You just don't like what they said.
63
Yes, exactly.

Notice he still has not explained what else could have hit the grass in such a way as to make Officer Foster feel certain that a bullet had hit the grass.

I don't need to explain it. You do. You are the one who has postulated that the hole in the turf is a bullet hole. The burden is on you to provide the evidence to support that. You have failed miserably.
Quote

Of course, to believe his lme denial, we'd have to believe that Lt. Day merely repeated what he'd heard, that the police inspector who talked with Dudman merely repeated what he'd heard, and that Walters' wife was lying when she said her husband told her they found a bullet in the grass.

All hearsay. Not one of these people is on record as saying they saw a bullet. [/quote]

And I guess we're supposed to believe that it means nothing that photos show that the man in the suit leaned down, put his hand in the hole, brought his hand upward with the hand cupped, and then put his hand in his pocket.
[/quote]

Tell us who that man was and what he said he found? Cite a source for these alleged photos so we can judge for ourselves what they show.
64
I don’t believe there were any bullet fragments in the chest, as per Dr Shaw’s WC testimony.  But he did have fragments in the wrist and leg.  The wrist wound is troublesome when you analyze the holes in the suit and shirt sleeves, and the pants.  Using both mannequins and a live stand in, I’ve run string through pre cut holes in a suit and shirt with French cuffs in the exact locations documented in the official record.  For the string to align, the French cuff had to be completely out of the suit sleeve and the forearm pronated (thumb down) to the near extreme end of its range.  Also the exit hole in the French cuff was jagged and highly irregular—almost a zig zag shape.  And yet the entry hole in the pants was round and the flesh wound in the leg described as “punctate” by Dr Shires.  The odds of a completely unstable bullet making the irregular exit hole in the cuff and within a few inches landing presumably base first to make a round hole has to be astronomical.

Why would you expect you reenactment of the shooting to produce exactly the same result as the actual shootiing?
65

In contrast, the non-fatal bullet that hit Governor Connally left fragments in his chest, wrist, and thigh, and it also veered leftward and downward


I don’t believe there were any bullet fragments in the chest, as per Dr Shaw’s WC testimony.  But he did have fragments in the wrist and leg.  The wrist wound is troublesome when you analyze the holes in the suit and shirt sleeves, and the pants.  Using both mannequins and a live stand in, I’ve run string through pre cut holes in a suit and shirt with French cuffs in the exact locations documented in the official record.  For the string to align, the French cuff had to be completely out of the suit sleeve and the forearm pronated (thumb down) to the near extreme end of its range.  Also the exit hole in the French cuff was jagged and highly irregular—almost a zig zag shape.  And yet the entry hole in the pants was round and the flesh wound in the leg described as “punctate” by Dr Shires.  The odds of a completely unstable bullet making the irregular exit hole in the cuff and within a few inches landing presumably base first to make a round hole has to be astronomical. 
68
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Kennedy and Nixon
« Last post by Benjamin Cole on Yesterday at 02:26:13 AM »
Read some of JFK's speeches and letters on South Vietnam.

JFK was an ardent anti-communist, and even tried to have Castro assassinated.

Back in the day, some people would take a segment from a Nixon speech and a JFK speech, for comparisons. Often, the segments read about the same.

Only later, did people like James Douglass re-frame JFK as singing kumbaya.

70
It could mean; removed, received or recovered
 ::) It does not say "removed"
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10