Did you read that on MS(now no one is watch)?  Even if it were true, then at least means he can read.  That puts him ahead of Kamala and Joe.

But it IS in the WC testimony of James Jarman estimating that he and Norman were out front of TSBD as late as 12:25. Now I think they both left about 12:22 when they heard a radio on a motorcycle parked nearby ( not sure which cop though) and they both started their return to the back of TSBD rear door and then took an elevator up to 5th floor . That would be only take maybe 1 min total time and then there is about 180 ft of floor to travel so by 12:23:30 they both are at their windows . Only THEN did BRW join them.

Then from Arnold Rowland WC there is bit more specific timing which I overlooked. Rowland actually is suggesting that he had seen the black man up to about 30 secs before the motorcade was 5 minutes away. Rowland was looking back every 30 secs approx right up till 12:23 when he looked and no longer saw anyone in the window.

So this why I was trying to work it out with all these 3 persons which if not until 12:23 the TSBD shooter only had 2 minutes max to move from whatever hiding place he was on the 6th floor to get to the SN , stack and orient the 3 boxes , if he was not to be captured in the Bronson film beginning at 12:25.

Now John C. May  think this all irrelevant but Imo if the shooter did not make a test run of placing his rifle on the boxes ,  then that could be the reason to have missed a 1st shot . The shooter basically  “slipped” a bit as he positioning the rifle and took aim, resulting in a miss farther off to right ( or even left side of limo  (that hit the manhole cover and or caused the grass uprooted)

Unfortunately those 75% witness pattern of 1….2.3 is too much % of a grouping to dismiss their recollections by saying they were simply wrong.

And as Dan has repeatedly posted on this thread the statements describing JFK reacting and slumping left when they had heard only 1 shot fired but not before they heard  a second shot , then how can this be concluded  as simply a wrong impression by these witnesses?

Well if it was not a slip fall then one has to wonder why Wiegman  would lay down like that when he could have just crouched down  bending his legs while balancing himself still on both feet if he wanted to change his camera perspective to lower ground.

     This is exactly why it is vital to view the Entire Bell Film/Wiegman Snippet. No cropping, no chopping, no giffing. On the (R) we see a Bench. Directly Below that Bench are Steps. Directly Below those Steps is the Knoll Grass. Wiegman's legs/feet are on the very same level as that Knoll Grass. He is on that Knoll Grass. He is Not sprawled across the Steps. Wiegman is Facing (W) toward the bottom of the Zapruder Perch. Wiegman is running/stumbling (W) across the Top portion of the Knoll Grass.
     At some point, Wiegman has to arrive (W) of the street light pole to then be standing next to the Newman Family. From where we see Wiegman on the Bell Film, what route does he take to arrive at the bottom of the Knoll and stand next to the Newman Family? Is the claim being made here that from the point we see Wiegman on the Bell Film, he then ran diagonally across the Knoll in order to arrive at the bottom of the Knoll and stand next to the Newman Family? That route would be contrary to the route we see him taking on the Couch Film. Wiegman had to of run (W) across the upper portion of the Knoll grass, in the direction of the bottom of the Zapruder Perch, and then turned left and ran (S) down the Knoll. This is what we see Wiegman doing on the Couch Film. Running (S) DOWN the knoll, Wiegman was then (W) of the street light pole and standing alongside the Newman Family at the bottom of the Knoll.
     The old blurry Bell Film images were responsible for this old wives tale of Wiegman being sprawled across the steps as he filmed the Hester's. Technology has improved the Bell Film definition to the point that it is now clear that Wiegman was not sprawled across the steps. To the contrary, the Bell Film now clearly shows Wiegman to Not being physically on the steps in any manner.
     Some of you are shocked to discover that what you cavalierly accepted as being a fact, is nothing but a 62+ yr old JFK Assassination Urban Legend. You need to accept that Technology is solving this case as it disproves 1 JFK Assassination Urban Legend at a time.