JFK Assassination Forum

While an accidental AR-15 discharge that fired a wild shot with the bullet going in some indeterminate direction is theoretically possible, I find it hard to believe. The shot would have been earsplitting to anyone in the limo as well as any nearby spectators on Elm St. such as the Newmans.  Maybe I could believe the other agents would cover for one of their own, but David Powers and Kenny O'Donnell were in the car too. What reason would they have to provide cover. Anyone who has been trained in firearms knows one of the cardinal rules of gun safety is you don't put your finger on the trigger until you have identified a target and are ready to shoot, just to guard against such an accidental discharge.

This is now getting ridiculous, the most practical way to carry the glove would be to do it as I have shown and the fact that your best comeback is to doubt my honesty, isn't very nice.
The following end on photo shows that my glove was simply doubled over, which just makes carrying the glove more comfortable, whereas your scenario seems to be a glove should be held in any specific way that distracts from your "theory". 



This perfectly sums up your conspiracy, you have taken an event which I have explained to you in intricate detail and given a logical plausible sequence of events and now you are just splitting the already split hairs. Your "imposter" theory as you have just repeatedly said has no reasonable explanation, like you said "you have no idea" and for that matter everyone, besides you, who has looked into this keeps telling you that it makes no sense and goes nowhere. Any potential assassins and their equipment would have been long gone, they would have jumped in a car and sped off and your latest theory of these "Boogey men" hiding in a stationary train car is just another desperate attempt to keep this silliness alive.
But in closing just let me repeat this very important fact, and repeat after me, "When your lone patsy is high and behind having ANY frontal shooter is real stoopid"!

JohnM

   It is NOT Costing the US Taxpayers 1 dime to build the ballroom. The Ballroom reaction we see above and elsewhere is simply TDS. And this includes those Hack Judges that continually display that they also have TDS. There is No rational reason to oppose the construction of this ballroom. None.

You go with your interpretation of cherry picked witnesses' accounts and ignore all the hard evidence that proves your interpretations are dead wrong. Frame Z271 alone disproves your theory. Oswald could not have shot JBC in the back at that frame because JBC was facing Oswald and JBC's shoulders were turned roughly 45 degrees off perpendicular to the bullet flight. That makes a back entry wound impossible. You ignore hard evidence because that doesn't support your fairy tale version of the assassination.

Using a similar logic, if the wind as seen in the following GIF was blowing up Elm street, no doubt being funnelled through the triple underpass, so how would the gunpowder smoke drift onto the road right next to the grassy knoll, if indeed your frontal sniper was behind the fence of the grassy knoll?



Taking this concept to its logical conclusion, the following diagram is my estimate of smoke dispersion from the theoretical position of the grassy knoll gunman who allegedly, according to flawed analysis by the HSCA audio "experts", fired one shot that missed. It would be interesting to know how dissipated the gun smoke from a single shot would be in the strong breeze, by the time it reached the sniffwitnesses?



The amount of smoke from a Carcano isn't very much and a modern firearm produces not much either.







Perhaps the Grassy Knoll assassin was using a Musket?



JohnM