Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10
61
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: U.S. And International Politics
« Last post by Lance Payette on Yesterday at 01:26:35 PM »
I noticed this morning that a fairly respected poll has Kamala Harris (remember her?) leading Vance, Rubio and Desantis (remember him?) by a very significant margin in a hypothetical 2028 race. Yes, it's early, but Putin and the KGB need to get to work on this or the entire Master Plot could be upended. Can Tennent Bagley be contacted by Ouija board in the mole-hunting afterlife and give us some guidance on this?

Apparently Newsom (whoever he is) and AOC (I've heard of her!) did well too, but not as well as Kamala. I tell ya, the Master Plot is hanging on by its fingernails.
62
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Aftermath In The Railroad Yard, Same Man?
« Last post by Lance Payette on Yesterday at 01:16:58 PM »
A "bloodless bullfight" in New Orleans - oh, sure, pal, we know what THAT was code for. You and Shaw discussed a "bloodless bullfight" - I think not, sir. It appears to me that Railroad Yard Guy has a bald spot and thus may be the gunman who Euins saw. Yep, that's it. Bloodless bullfight / Shaw / PO Box / bald spot = case closed.

I actually think these are two different people, but I will concede - wait for it - PROPINQUITY!
63
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Gov. John Connally Grips His White Stetson Hat at Z-272
« Last post by Benjamin Cole on Yesterday at 01:13:03 PM »
Several witnesses saw the rifle in the SN and three men on the floor below heard the three shots from above them.--AM

Actually, one of the three fifth-floor ear-witnesses testified to the WC that he thought the shots had come from beneath them.



64
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: The Sawyer Memo and a Winchester
« Last post by Lance Payette on Yesterday at 01:07:19 PM »
Quote from: Benjamin Cole on Yesterday at 01:58:25 AM
The phrase "Occam's razor" is a bit trite, but in this case...

Inspector Sawyer, evidently a man promoted through the ranks of the DPD, a department that used civil service exams, age 47 and thus not likely senile etc., testified under oath to Belin this:



Sawyer testified the witness said a white male was seen "carrying" a rifle, post JFKA. No clothing description. Sawyer called in the description. Seems clear enough.

The witness may have been unreliable, and the witness evidently then decided to not get further involved.

The word "carrying" does not describe what witnesses saw in the TSBD6 sniper window, which was a figure pointing a rifle towards the motorcade.

If I had seen figure in the TSBD6 window shooting in the direction of the motorcade, I would not say "the figure was 'carrying' a rifle."

I am not sure why, but many witnesses in Dallas back then seemed fearful of getting involved in the JFKA in any fashion. Other people are fearful of publicity or police, and dismissive of official forms and falderal. The witness may have thought, "I have discharged my civic duty, and the rest is up to them."

The most reasonable deduction is a contemporary 11.22 witness told the DPD they saw a white man, approx. 5' 10" 165 lbs, "carrying" a rifle in the aftermath of the JFKA, near or around the TSBD. 

That is likely what happened.

Was the 11.22 witness accurate in his observations? Who knows?

My simple answer to that is: Brennan said he saw a rifle. I don't think a DPD officer is going to assume the assassin left the building unarmed. That would be an assumption that could get his fellow officers killed. So because Oswald was seen with a rifle, Sawyer added "carrying a rifle." Pretty much the equivalent of the common "the suspect may be armed."

Sawyer said he relied "mainly on one witness" - and that was clearly Brennan. If he had relied on a second witness who said he saw someone running out the rear of the TSBD with a rifle, that surely would have been the primary witness. The omission of this witness would have been inexplicable.

Sawyer was 47 when he testified to the WC and thus only 61 when he spoke to the HSCA. I couldn't find an obituary. Once again we have one of these CT "smoking guns" that Sawyer apparently never said anything about at the time or ever again and none of the legions of CT "researchers" ever bothered to follow up on.
65
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Aftermath In The Railroad Yard, Same Man?
« Last post by Duncan MacRae on Yesterday at 12:11:47 PM »
Aftermath In The Railroad Yard, Same Man?






66
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: The Sawyer Memo and a Winchester
« Last post by Tom Graves on Yesterday at 07:28:38 AM »
Quote from: Benjamin Cole on Yesterday at 06:36:45 AM
Larry Hancock thinks SAVAK may have been involved in the RFKA, manipulating Palestinian activists.

I'm guessing Hancock doesn't believe in the Single Bullet Hypothesis.

Pity that.

Quote
The IRGC has targeted Trump a few times.

How dare they do that to The Traitorous Orange Turd!!!
67
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: The Sawyer Memo and a Winchester
« Last post by Tom Graves on Yesterday at 07:23:21 AM »
Quote from: Benjamin Cole on Yesterday at 06:36:45 AM
The IRGC has targeted Trump a few times.

How dare they!
68
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: The Sawyer Memo and a Winchester
« Last post by Benjamin Cole on Yesterday at 06:36:45 AM »
TG--

Larry Hancock thinks SAVAK may have been involved in the RFKA, manipulating Palestinian activists.

So far, no Iranians in the JFKA.

The IRGC has targeted Trump a few times.
69
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: This at least gives me pause about the LN narrative
« Last post by Benjamin Cole on Yesterday at 06:34:12 AM »
LP--

You ask interesting questions.

Veteran researcher Larry Hancock wrote a book recently on LHO, with David Boylan.

They contend LHO was only a wayward, antsy earnest Marxist, and they agree with you that LHO's behavior was not that of a guilty party.

I posited to Hancock (a very civil and smart fellow) that LHO had taken a potshot at Walker, and Hancock somewhat demurred. Given the evidence, I contend LHO at least took a shot in Walker's direction, and also likely had a ride that night.

Meaning LHO had confederates.

My take is LHO's immediate post-JFK behavior is that of someone complicit or thought he had been framed, or even both (he was left holding the bag). Johnny Calvin Brewer's testimony is interesting. LHO furtive behavior in the alcove of Brewer's shoe store, and then sneaking into the Texas Theater...not that of someone uninvolved in the JFKA. This, after LHO armed himself.

But human nature is not always predictable, and LHO was likely (in my layman's opinion) suffering from some forms of mental illness. He may have been cool and calm in police custody...but LHO also panicked and shot JD Tippit dead.

Caveat emptor, and draw your own conclusions.






70
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: The Sawyer Memo and a Winchester
« Last post by Tom Graves on Yesterday at 06:11:38 AM »
Quote from: Benjamin Cole on Yesterday at 06:03:59 AM
Your Solie-CT has more plausibility than other CTs and LNTs.

Gee, thanks.

All other, or just a few?

Regardless, I'll try to incorporate Castro's G2 and / or the Iranians into it for you.
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10