If you have any investigation/detective skills what so ever you'll understand that Sarah Stanton accidentally caught Harvey hiding on the 2nd Floor staircase landing waiting for Mrs Reid to excite the ladies in the 2nd Floor Lunch Room with reports of the limousine's progress as related to her by her husband over the telephone...This ruse was designed to impart on supervisor Reid the power to organize the lady employees as a group to go down to the street/front steps to watch the motorcade - therefore leaving a safe window-less room empty in the back of the building where the patsy would not be seen...Stanton was probably one of the ladies Mrs Reid cleared out and her unexpected encounter with Harvey on the staircase landing was an unplanned mistake that exposed the whole plan to a witness...It is possible that Harvey's encounter with Stanton drove him temporarily down to the 1st Floor where he saw Jarman and Norman enter...But Harvey came back up to the 2nd Floor Lunch Room where he was seen by Carolyn Arnold carrying out his intention of going back in to the Break Room to eat his lunch...Later the 2nd Floor staircase landing would once again prove detrimental to the conspiracy when Officer Baker saw Harvey standing looking out the Lunch Room Vestibule window...

It is all pretty wrapped up now Corbett...Don't bother with shallow denials...

The Education Forum prefers not to solve the case and works against this final solution...It does so so it can keep its favorite researcher Bart Kamp from being embarrassingly refuted...

The Education Forum enforces Gordon's wrongful banning of myself with total censorship...It does that because otherwise they would have to admit their site was run by a fool who banned the guy who cracked the case...

Why are you bothering to post here or the Ed Forum? Why aren't you taking your "ground shaking" discoveries, to CBS, NBC, ABC, Fox, CNN, MSNOW or any of the other cable news outlets? How about the NY Times, WaPo, or the LA Times? Fame and fortune await you if you would just get off your keester and show some initiative. Why aren't you sharing this with the rest of the world?

If you have any investigation/detective skills what so ever you'll understand that Sarah Stanton accidentally caught Harvey hiding on the 2nd Floor staircase landing waiting for Mrs Reid to excite the ladies in the 2nd Floor Lunch Room with reports of the limousine's progress as related to her by her husband over the telephone...This ruse was designed to impart on supervisor Reid the power to organize the lady employees as a group to go down to the street/front steps to watch the motorcade - therefore leaving a safe window-less room empty in the back of the building where the patsy would not be seen...Stanton was probably one of the ladies Mrs Reid cleared out and her unexpected encounter with Harvey on the staircase landing was an unplanned mistake that exposed the whole plan to a witness...It is possible that Harvey's encounter with Stanton drove him temporarily down to the 1st Floor where he saw Jarman and Norman enter...But Harvey came back up to the 2nd Floor Lunch Room where he was seen by Carolyn Arnold carrying out his intention of going back in to the Break Room to eat his lunch...Later the 2nd Floor staircase landing would once again prove detrimental to the conspiracy when Officer Baker saw Harvey standing looking out the Lunch Room Vestibule window...

It is all pretty wrapped up now Corbett...Don't bother with shallow denials...

The Education Forum prefers not to solve the case and works against this final solution...It does so so it can keep its favorite researcher Bart Kamp from being embarrassingly refuted...

The Education Forum enforces Gordon's wrongful banning of myself with total censorship...It does that because otherwise they would have to admit their site was run by a fool who banned the guy who cracked the case...

There is manifest proof Oswald married Marina in 1961. Are you suggesting otherwise?

Not surprisingly, when a PSE polygraph analysis was done on a recording of Officer Bentley repeating his belated claim that he found a Hidell ID card in Oswald's wallet on the way to the police station, the PSE showed hard stress, a clear indication he was lying.

You do seem to have a fondness for junk science.

AI provided this assessment on the validity of PSE:

Reliability of the Psychological Stress Evaluator
The Psychological Stress Evaluator (PSE) has not been shown to be a scientifically valid or reliable tool for objectively measuring stress, and its use is generally considered unreliable in clinical and legal contexts.

What the PSE Is
The PSE is a device that claims to detect stress by analyzing vocal characteristics such as pitch, tone, and “micro tremors”
neurolaunch.com
 
It was marketed for use in law enforcement, corporate security, and some mental health settings
neurolaunch.com

Research Findings
Limited clinical validity: A 1981 Johns Hopkins University study found no correlation between PSE readings and established measures of anxiety and hostility, suggesting it has only limited value as a clinical assessment tool
pure.johnshopkins.edu

Scientific criticism: Independent research has shown that the PSE’s “micro tremor” indicator has little correlation with truthfulness or actual stress levels
John E. Reid and Associates, Inc.

The device may increase confession rates in interrogations, but this is due to psychological pressure, not accurate measurement
John E. Reid and Associates, Inc.

Legal restrictions: Several U.S. states have banned the PSE, and courts have excluded confessions obtained with it, citing lack of scientific validity and potential coercion

Corbett is obviously having trouble dealing with the subject matter which is ground shattering, breaks the case wide open, and speaks for itself...However that kind of thing is understandable from nay-saying denial trolls whose objective is to deny any evidence of conspiracy...The people with no excuse are persons like Jim DiEugenio and the main CTer's who have gone out of their way to suppress and ignore this break-through of our generation...

If your discovery is so "ground shattering", why is it that no print or electronic news organizations have picked up on it. Don't you think they would be interested if you had what you claim to have?