Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10
31


   There are two main reasons why Ruby did this...

   First was to accent the sheep-dipping of patsy Oswald in order to make him look like a true communist/Castro sympathizer...

   Second was to look Oswald in the eye and remind him to maintain character in his his role playing as a crazed communist...And that one of the plotters could get right next to him to remind him...
32
It is worth noting that in their various and conflicting SBT trajectory illustrations, lone-gunman theorists have failed to include one or more of these three key facts: (1) the HSCA FPP's placement of the back wound at T1, i.e., below the throat wound, (2) the HSCA FPP's acknowledgment that the autopsy photo of the back wound shows the bullet hit at an upward angle and then tunneled at an upward angle (a fact that Dr. Werner Spitz had already confirmed for the Rockefeller Commission in 1975), and (3) Dr. Baden's demonstration of how far forward JFK would have had to be leaning to make the T1 entry wound and the upward trajectory through the neck line up with a shot from the sixth-floor window.

One myth that is common in pro-SBT trajectory presentations is the WC's fiction that the back wound was above the throat wound and that the bullet traveled downward through JFK's neck. This is the case even in pro-SBT presentations that show JFK sitting upright with his head leaning only slightly forward.

Some examples:

The Single Bullet Theory

While showing JFK sitting straight up with his head held upright, this video shows the bullet hitting above the throat wound and then traveling downward through the neck. The narration even specifies that the bullet "traveled downward, exiting through his throat."

JFK Assassination: Father, Son Probe Single-Bullet Theory

This shows the SBT trajectory depiction used in NOVA's 2013 Cold Case JFK documentary. It has JFK sitting straight up with his head held upright, and yet it has the bullet hitting at the base of the neck, above the throat wound, and even going through the top of the shirt collar to hit above the throat wound, ignoring the fact that the hole in the back of JFK's shirt was over 5 inches below the collar. And, of course, it has the bullet traveling downward through JFK's neck.

The Kennedy Assassination: Beyond Conspiracy

This is Dale Myers' SBT trajectory animation.

It is a particularly curious, confused, and misleading animation. To his credit, Myers has JFK sitting upright with his head tilted only slightly forward, and he actually places the back wound about 5 inches below the coat collar, but things go badly downhill from there.

For starters, when Myers shows the back wound's location, he doesn't show the shirt collar. A number of photos/footage show that part of JFK's shirt collar was visible above the coat collar.

Then, when he shows a frontal view of JFK to illustrate the alleged exit point in the throat, he has the coat collar riding up so high on JFK's back that it's about an inch above JFK's hairline, which markedly contradicts his depiction of the coat collar in his portrayal of the back wound's entry point. With the coat collar so high on the back, it gives the visual impression that the back wound was above the throat wound. Even worse, he leaves the coat collar in this fictional position from that point onward in the video.

When Myers first shows a trajectory line from JFK's throat, he shows the bullet traveling downward toward Connally and apparently on a downward trajectory from the back wound. I say "apparently" because Myers initially provides no trajectory line into JFK's back and no line through the neck. He only shows a trajectory line exiting the throat. 

But, 41 seconds later in the video, when Myers does show a trajectory line from the back wound through the throat wound, he has the bullet entering the back at a point above the throat wound and traveling downward through the neck, even though he still has JFK sitting upright with his head only slightly tilted forward.

Has Myers never read what the HSCA FPP's report says about the trajectory through the neck, i.e., that the bullet entered and tunneled at an upward angle, not a downward angle? Has Myers never seen the HSCA FPP's diagram of their SBT trajectory, which shows Kennedy's head and torso tilted substantially forward? Has Myers never seen Dr. Baden's demonstration of how far forward JFK would have had to be leaning to make the FPP's SBT trajectory align with the sixth-floor window?

In an amazing statement of falsehood, Myers says that JFK and Connally "react at the same time"! Do the media outlets that have aired Myers' animation not have any fact checkers? Not even the WC made this demonstrably false claim.

Also, Myers has the alleged SBT bullet hitting JFK and Connally in Z224, even though Connally himself -- you know, the guy who actually experienced the wounding -- said he was certain he was not hit before Z229.

To read about more of the problems with Myers' SBT trajectory animation, see veteran JFKA researcher Robert Harris's demolition of it:

Dale Myers' Single-Bullet Presentation Destroyed

Dr. John Lattimer's various SBT trajectory illustrations showed the entry point at C3/C4, visibly above the throat wound, and showed the bullet traveling downward through the neck (e.g., "Two of Dr. John Lattimer’s Single-Bullet Theory Trajectory Illustrations"). WC apologists in this very forum have posted Lattimer's fictional SBT trajectory diagrams to defend the SBT. Matt Douthit presents two of Lattimer's SBT diagrams in this excellent video with Pat Speer:

Lattimer Revisited

Speer and Douthit not only debunk Lattimer's SBT claims but also address other issues related to the shooting, such as the bunched-clothing theory and the Thorburn-position myth. They also point out that the T1 location destroys the SBT.

Of course, Lattimer did his diagrams to support CE 385, the WC's diagram of the SBT's supposed trajectory through JFK's neck, which puts the back wound above the throat wound and shows the bullet traveling downward through the neck. The diagram was drawn under Dr. Humes's direction for the WC. The diagram is cited three times in the Warren Report and was published as one of the WC's exhibits (16 H 977). You can view it here:

https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh16/html/WH_Vol16_0501a.htm

Just another load of crap. If you cannot explain the trajectory through Gov Connally and the medical analysis of his wounds in the context of a separate shot, then this is what it appears to be, just another failed crapped out Michael Griffith theory. Before you make a complete fool of yourself maybe read up on what is in involved in the Lattimer, Posner, Meyers theory. A better suggestion would be to go back to your headwound theory. At least it was always good for a laugh.
33
It is worth noting that in their various and conflicting SBT trajectory illustrations, lone-gunman theorists have failed to include one or more of these three key facts: (1) the HSCA FPP's placement of the back wound at T1, i.e., below the throat wound, (2) the HSCA FPP's acknowledgment that the autopsy photo of the back wound shows the bullet hit at an upward angle and then tunneled at an upward angle (a fact that Dr. Werner Spitz had already confirmed for the Rockefeller Commission in 1975), and (3) Dr. Baden's demonstration of how far forward JFK would have had to be leaning to make the T1 entry wound and the upward trajectory through the neck line up with a shot from the sixth-floor window.

One myth that is common in pro-SBT trajectory presentations is the WC's fiction that the back wound was above the throat wound and that the bullet traveled downward through JFK's neck. This is the case even in pro-SBT presentations that show JFK sitting upright with his head leaning only slightly forward.

Some examples:

The Single Bullet Theory

While showing JFK sitting straight up with his head held upright, this video shows the bullet hitting above the throat wound and then traveling downward through the neck. The narration even specifies that the bullet "traveled downward, exiting through his throat."

JFK Assassination: Father, Son Probe Single-Bullet Theory

This shows the SBT trajectory depiction used in NOVA's 2013 Cold Case JFK documentary. It has JFK sitting straight up with his head held upright, and yet it has the bullet hitting at the base of the neck, above the throat wound, and even going through the top of the shirt collar to hit above the throat wound, ignoring the fact that the hole in the back of JFK's shirt was over 5 inches below the collar. And, of course, it has the bullet traveling downward through JFK's neck.

The Kennedy Assassination: Beyond Conspiracy

This is Dale Myers' SBT trajectory animation.

It is a particularly curious, confused, and misleading animation. To his credit, Myers has JFK sitting upright with his head tilted only slightly forward, and he actually places the back wound about 5 inches below the coat collar, but things go badly downhill from there.

For starters, when Myers shows the back wound's location, he doesn't show the shirt collar. A number of photos/footage show that part of JFK's shirt collar was visible above the coat collar.

Then, when he shows a frontal view of JFK to illustrate the alleged exit point in the throat, he has the coat collar riding up so high on JFK's back that it's about an inch above JFK's hairline, which markedly contradicts his depiction of the coat collar in his portrayal of the back wound's entry point. With the coat collar so high on the back, it gives the visual impression that the back wound was above the throat wound. Even worse, he leaves the coat collar in this fictional position from that point onward in the video.

When Myers first shows a trajectory line from JFK's throat, he shows the bullet traveling downward toward Connally and apparently on a downward trajectory from the back wound. I say "apparently" because Myers initially provides no trajectory line into JFK's back and no line through the neck. He only shows a trajectory line exiting the throat. 

But, 41 seconds later in the video, when Myers does show a trajectory line from the back wound through the throat wound, he has the bullet entering the back at a point above the throat wound and traveling downward through the neck, even though he still has JFK sitting upright with his head only slightly tilted forward.

Has Myers never read what the HSCA FPP's report says about the trajectory through the neck, i.e., that the bullet entered and tunneled at an upward angle, not a downward angle? Has Myers never seen the HSCA FPP's diagram of their SBT trajectory, which shows Kennedy's head and torso tilted substantially forward? Has Myers never seen Dr. Baden's demonstration of how far forward JFK would have had to be leaning to make the FPP's SBT trajectory align with the sixth-floor window?

In an amazing statement of falsehood, Myers says that JFK and Connally "react at the same time"! Do the media outlets that have aired Myers' animation not have any fact checkers? Not even the WC made this demonstrably false claim.

Also, Myers has the alleged SBT bullet hitting JFK and Connally in Z224, even though Connally himself -- you know, the guy who actually experienced the wounding -- said he was certain he was not hit before Z229.

To read about more of the problems with Myers' SBT trajectory animation, see veteran JFKA researcher Robert Harris's demolition of it:

Dale Myers' Single-Bullet Presentation Destroyed

Dr. John Lattimer's various SBT trajectory illustrations showed the entry point at C3/C4, visibly above the throat wound, and showed the bullet traveling downward through the neck (e.g., "Two of Dr. John Lattimer’s Single-Bullet Theory Trajectory Illustrations"). WC apologists in this very forum have posted Lattimer's fictional SBT trajectory diagrams to defend the SBT. Matt Douthit presents two of Lattimer's SBT diagrams in this excellent video with Pat Speer:

Lattimer Revisited

Speer and Douthit not only debunk Lattimer's SBT claims but also address other issues related to the shooting, such as the bunched-clothing theory and the Thorburn-position myth. They also point out that the T1 location destroys the SBT.

Of course, Lattimer did his diagrams to support CE 385, the WC's diagram of the SBT's supposed trajectory through JFK's neck, which puts the back wound above the throat wound and shows the bullet traveling downward through the neck. The diagram was drawn under Dr. Humes's direction for the WC. The diagram is cited three times in the Warren Report and was published as one of the WC's exhibits (16 H 977). You can view it here:

https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh16/html/WH_Vol16_0501a.htm
34
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: The First Shot
« Last post by Dan O'meara on Today at 12:22:28 PM »
Dear danny BOY o'meara,

Those Secret Service guys in the follow-up car were so mixed up (from the chaos of the moment, lack of sleep and possible "Salty Dick" hangovers) that they confused the "firecracker"-sound at "Z-124" (which they didn't turn around after) with Oswald's second shot at approximately Z-222 (which they did turn around after).

LOL!

-- Tom

I'm glad you put a "LOL" at the end of your post. Your opinions are a joke and it's good you recognise that.
That Landis, Ready and Hickey describe turning to their right and rear as a result of the first shot and that Altgens6 actually shows them doing exactly that...
....what's the point?
z207 shows no such reaction. They are all facing forward.
I'm glad you now accept you were completely wrong about Bennett in z207. When you grow up you might gain the courage to acknowledge such things.

Your campaign of disinformation regarding this issue is funny considering how its you whose always crying about others spreading disinformation.
Keep up the good work Comrade Jerkov  Thumb1:
35
   I am going to stop you at your very 1st point. Sitzman was needed to steady Zapruder on the pedestal. She would have needed to help him down from that same pedestal. She is also supposed to have then gone inside the shelter with Zapruder. Based on Sitzman telling Josiah Thompson that after she got down from the pedestal, she then went DOWN to the BOTTOM of the Knoll, makes this age old stuff of Sitzman sticking to Zapruder another JFK Urban Legend. Like the bucket sitting next to the JFK Limo being stored inside the JFK Limo trunk, and Barber's thread dismantling JFK clutching at his chest/throat. If YOU are going to establish timelines, you need to stick to the FACTS. Not JFK Assassination Urban Legends that mirror the clap trap connected to the Lost Dutchman's Mine. And "snychronisations" are Not Facts. The Wiegman Film is a FACT. Sitzman and Zapruder are Not on the Pedestal or near the Pedestal on the Wiegman Film. The frames showing they are Not There are shot from Elm St and from the Knoll. 2 different views at 2 different points in time.
    On "Unsolved History JFK Death In Dealey Plaza" (2003) Discovery Channel, Gary Mack takes Wiegman on a walk-through there on the Knoll. Wiegman then describes what he did on the Knoll. At NO POINT does Wiegman mention running across the knoll like that figure we see on the Bell Film. You need to establish what is FACT and what is JFK Assassination Urban Legend/Clap Trap. To this day, NOBODY including Wiegman himself has EVER verified the figure we see running across the Knoll on the Bell Film is Wiegman.   

At NO POINT does Wiegman mention running across the knoll like that figure we see on the Bell Film.

Point out this figure running across the knoll in the Bell film.
Weigman never moves from his position.
What person are you talking about?
Give me a version of the Bell film and give me the timestamp of that film where we can see this figure you say is running across the knoll.

Have you done an analysis of the Weigman film?
Have you worked out where Weigman was when he filmed the Hesters?
36
ZM-

There are enigmas a-plenty in the JFKA.

I suspect a shot passed through JFK's throat from the rear.

Another, separate shot passed through Gov. JBC.

A third shot struck JFK in the head.

The Tague shot does not seem to have its origin in any of the three aforementioned shots.

Bullets do not always follow a straight line through bodies. It may be the first shot, that struck JFK in the upper back, then turned upwards slightly inside JFK's body and exited through his throat-Adam's apple area, and then left the cab. It was never recovered.

The first shot is not likely the Tague shot, as only lead was found on the curb-strike by the FBI. If a FMJ had passed only through JFK's neck, it would retain its copper (technically bronze) FMJ.

The second shot, passing through JBC, stayed in the cab. There is clean and small round hole in JBC's pant eg, when the bullet passed into his thigh. That is that.

The third shot hit JFK in the lower right-rear section of his skull. Evidently, it entered his skull, and blew out the right temple area.

Seems like a long shot that some lead squirted out of the FMJ hitting JFK's head, went 270-290 feet to the left, and then struck the curb with enough force to cause concrete or matter to spray upwards and cut Tague's face.

My best guess is the Tague shot did not come from the TSBD-6 sniper's nest.

Most witnesses heard three shots, although some did hear four. Inside the TSBD, three shots were heard, loud as a  "cannon."

This does not rule out the use of weapons with silencers, or simultaneous shots heard as one shot.

In fact, the Tague shot seems to have flummoxed two official investigations.

The HSCA concluded the Tague shot was a missed shot from LHO---but that does not explain the lead-only deposit on the curb near Tague. The distance from Tague to the limo--270-290 feet or so---makes one wonder where the missed shot struck, so that it could subsequently squirt its lead core at Tague.

For reference that is nearly the length of a football field, goal-line to goal-line.

The HSCA did conclude there had been a second gunsel in the DP that day, and that he fired. They did not link the Tague to the second gunsel. I don't know why.





37
Neil must’ve dated Venus once, huh ?  lol
38
The CT will suggest that CE 399 is questionable  due to Wrights description of the bullet being grey colored and pointed and the slight deformation of CE 399 improbable, and that the trajectory thru JFK to JC has not been proved by shooting experiment and that Myers computer model is flawed , therefore the SBT must be wrong.

So if not the SBT then where did all the bullets that were fired into JFK and JC  (preceding the Z313)go?

If the Doctors were not colluding, then none of them saw or removed any whole  intact bullets from JFKs back or throat or from any part of JCs body.

How do you explain no bullets found in JFKs upper torso and his neck if there is no exit for a frontal shot To the throat and no exit point for a bullet that hit JFK in his back?
39
Billy Graham
Pope Paul VI
Mother Teresa (aka Anjezë Gonxhe Bojaxhiu)
The Mormon Tabernacle Choir

These were just the ringleaders.

anyone else know of a ringleader?  Lord Buckley led them all, along with the Nazz’, the Hip Einie et. alia……… missing heroes like Bruce Wayne and Green Lantern+


* note EF post on Priscilla, p.3
40
The HSCA panel of photographic analysis experts were split on what the Zapruder film shows. Two dimensional imagery. The belief of the several members of the HSCA FPP was based on interpretation of the abrasion margin of the wound. I recall that there are two different descriptions of the abrasion margins found in the HSCA volumes. I could be wrong though.

The Zapruder film is another example of the FPP operating outside their element. I wonder if any member of it had a film of a murder on which they rendered a professional judgement. It's not something they would have much if any experience. As film analysts, they were all amateurs.
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10