31
JFK Assassination & General Discussion & Debate / Re: How Did Bart Kamp Create The Lovelady Image?
« Last post by Royell Storing on Yesterday at 06:51:16 PM »DOYLE - You must have no idea what Molina looks like.
Recent Posts
You guys say this about every item of evidence that you can't explain.The lack of damage to the windshield in Altgens 6 has already been pretty thoroughly explained. Yourf OP fails completely at that point, and can't be resuscitated by anything Weldon presented.
I'm guessing you haven't bothered to read any of the articles and videos that I've linked in previous replies.
Would you care to offer an explanation for the evidence that Weldon presents, for starters? No, of course not. When at least eight witnesses in three different locations independently confirm something, such corroboration is usually considered to be very strong evidence.
What makes you think your musings are worth reading. The stuff you post is silly enough. We don't need to go on a scavenger hunt to find further evidence of your silliness.Look how Barb Junkkarinen researched this question vs. how Michael Griffith looked into it (Junkkarinen was a conspiracist not a lone assassin believer). She didn't uncritically accept any claims about seeing a hole, she looked into them, tried to re-create where they were, what they could see. Were they credible? She sifted through the evidence pro and con, weighed them, and came to a conclusion. Whether it was right or not is second to the question of *how* she studied the issue.
Not nearly as strong as forensic evidence.
You guys say this about every item of evidence that you can't explain.
I'm guessing you haven't bothered to read any of the articles and videos that I've linked in previous replies.
Would you care to offer an explanation for the evidence that Weldon presents, for starters? No, of course not. When at least eight witnesses in three different locations independently confirm something, such corroboration is usually considered to be very strong evidence.
Same cherry pickeddoesn't make it so.
Why do you even bother?
TG-
Do you dislike the Donks and the Phants equally?
On any given day...
Lately, with the Mamdani-stan wing of the D-Party becoming ascendant...maybe 60/40 favor for the GOP.
But, in general it is a race to the bottom between these two parties....
I like Marco Rubio.
I will never understand why so many people look at eye and ear witness accounts as if they are empirical evidence. Witness accounts, by themselves, do not establish anything as factual. Witnesses can be, and often are, wrong. Yet when somebody comes across a witness that fits their preferred narrative, they latch onto it as "proof" of what they choose to believe. They act as if "So and so said........" establishes a fact without ever offering any supporting evidence that indicates what so-and-so said is correct. It might be correct and it might very well be wrong. All eye and ear witness accounts should be looked at as a big MAYBE unless and until it can be corroborated. While multiple witnesses saying the same thing is a bit more compelling than a single witness, it still doesn't establish what they said is correct. Multiple people can make the same mistake. Case in point. A large group of witnesses said all the shots came from the direction of the GK and another large group of witnesses said the shots all came from the direction of the TSBD. Obviously, both groups cannot be right. There is a large group of witnesses who all said the same wrong thing. They all made the same mistake. So while multiple witnesses saying the same thing is a bit more compelling than a single witness, it still does not establish a fact. The only time I will point to an eye or ear witness as evidence is if that witness can be corroborated by forensic evidence.
doesn't make it so.I have seen some really stupid posts by Griffith, but this one takes the cake!
I usually don't read his tripe, but this one caught my eye because of its special type of absurdity.
In Motorcade 63, DPD Baker was located on Houston Street when he saw the pigeons fly up from the top of the TSBD. Mr Belin measured his position as being 60 to 80 feet North of the Main Street curb. According to Motorcade 63, that places the limousine at Z205 to Z225.Given the approximate nature of that kind of estimate and correlation to the zfilm it does not exclude the possibility of a shot fitting with Phil Willis’ evidence of a first shot just before z202.
Mr. BAKER - We appreoximated it was 60 to 80 feet there, north of the north curbline of Main on Houston.
Mr. BELIN - All right. Did you see or hear or do anything else after you heard the first noise?
Mr. BAKER - Yes, sir. As I was looking up, all these pigeons began to fly up to the top of the buildings here and I saw those come up and start flying around.