JFK Assassination Forum

While I'm sure Hickey Howard (as those of us who knew him best always called him) was a talented gunsmith who adopted stray puppies and never beat his wife, the fact is that he pretty well destroyed George Hickey's life with his insane theory. Mortal Error is based 100% on Donahue. Hickey sued him and everyone involved in multiple forums but lost on purely technical (statute of limitation) grounds. Hickey probably belongs with Ruth Paine and Clay Shaw on the Mt. Rushmore of those defamed by CT wackos. There is a woman at the Ed Forum (but of course!) named Denise Hazelwood who is doing her fanatical best to keep the defamation alive: https://www.a-benign-conspiracy.com/.

This is Episode 1 of a new feature, "Weird thread of the week." All suggestions are welcome.

When I was heavily involved in Christian theology and apologetics, it occurred to me that I had NEVER had a dream that was even vaguely biblical, let alone a visitation by Jesus or Mary or anything like that. NOTHING. I posted the question on several evangelical forums and people were in near-unanimous agreement that, by God, they too had never had a dream relating to this central theme of their waking lives.

Golf, I have to admit, is probably the central theme of my waking life since the age of 12. Only in recent years, however, have I started having some pretty vivid golf dreams. When Carl Jung, the famed Swiss psychologist, was ill with a terminal illness, he was amazed that he had absolutely no dreams relating to death or his own mortality; it was one of the things that convinced him bodily death was "no big deal" to his core self.

So, JFKA fanatics, enquiring minds wonder if you have ever had any sort of JFKA-related dreams? (Dreams in which Jedgar and Clyde Tolson are doing weird things with inflatable dolls do not count; we would like something a little more directly related if possible.) If you have had no such dreams, don't you find this a bit odd? Bonus points for JFKA-related dreams in which Jesus appeared.

 
Many, many times I have had dreams about the assassination.  I've lost count.
The ones that were really weird stick out more than others. 

I don't know how many researchers I have asked over the years if they've ever had a dream about it, and not one ever said yes.

 One of the weirdest was when I was when I dreamt I worked at the TSBD and Oswald worked there. We never spoke to each other or anything like that. He was just there.
Somehow, the motorcade was coming, and I was in a position inside the depository where I was looking up from below Oswald as he was at the 6th floor window waiting for the motorcade to come by, and I'm sitting or standing there watching him with the rifle pointed out the window.  The motorcade drives by, he fired shots, but I didn't see the limousine in the dream, so I didn't know if he struck JFK or not.  The focus in the dream was watching Oswald fire the rifle.  Then I woke up.

They follow Stalins Marxist creed in California: it does not matter how many voters there are or who they are , whether they are legal citizens or illegal aliens, or dead people or dogs and cats. The only important thing is to make sure that the votes are being counted by Marxist Democrats.

   Yes, you have the Stalin philosophy correct. And Calif reflects this. The only Joe 6 Packs still living inside Calif, are those that can Not afford to relocate. These people are trapped inside a modern day plantation.

Why would other shooter than Oswald choose TSBD and Dealey Plaza as the place to shoot at JFK limo?

I’ve long since given up on the idea that there was more than one shooter , because one shooter , especially a well trained one is good enough at ranges less than 100 yds.

I don't think anyone other than Oswald would choose TSBD6. It just has way too many risks associated with it. For that matter, I've expressed puzzlement that Oswald would choose it. It was the lunch hour, the M-C was nicely wrapped as curtain rods, no one paid any attention to Oswald anyway, and he could have easily decamped to a much more plausible location like the roof of the Dal-Tex or County Records building. Oswald and his M-C on TSBD6 makes sense if he was a dupe and was somehow (how?) induced to shoot from this unlikely location, with the conspirators (e.g., Mafia) not caring if he was caught or killed because he knew nothing anyway except that he was part of a pro-Castro plot. If he got lucky and killed JFK, that would be the end of the matter. However, because TSBD6 was highly risky and Oswald and his M-C were marginally reliable at best, a pro was stationed on the roof of the Dal-Tex or County Records building if needed (as he was). Either of those locations was essentially risk-free for a pro dressed like a businessman with a briefcase assassination rifle. In this scenario, Dealey Plaza really wasn't a bad assassination scene. I think this scenario makes near-perfect sense; the challenge is filling in the blanks with something resembling evidence, as John Orr is at least trying to do. If one doesn't like the Mafia scenario, an anti-Cuban pro works just as well.

Of course, if OSWALD HIMSELF really didn't care if he was caught or killed, then the TSBD6 and the LN narrative works fine.

So is it your belief that JBC suddenly flipped his right arm upward at Z226 in anticipation of it being struck by a bullet 3.6 seconds later?

This is beyond silly.

The people who claim the SBT is preposterous rarely want to tell us why it is preposterous.

You have no clue what you're talking about. If you would ever dare yourself to read just some of the scholarly refutations of the SBT, you would quickly discover that they have explained in great detail why the theory is preposterous.

When they attempt to do that, their arguments get shot down like clay pigeons.

Perhaps in your dreams. BTW, which SBT do you accept? The one that has the bullet entering at C7 or the one that has the bullet entering at T1? The one that has the bullet traveling at a downward angle or the one that has the bullet traveling at a slightly upward angle? The one that has the bullet hitting JFK above the alleged exit point or the one that has the bullet hitting JFK slightly below the exit point? The one that has Connally rotated to the right by 10-15 degrees or the one that has him rotated to the right by 20-30 degrees? The one that has the magic bullet as the first shot or the one that has it as the second shot? The one that has the bullet hitting JFK at Z188-190, or the one that has the bullet hitting JFK at Z221, or the one that has the bullet hitting JFK at Z224? The one that says JFK shows no signs of reacting to the wound until Z226, or the one that says he is already reacting in Z225, or the one that says he begins to react at Z200?

Just for once, do a modicum of balanced research and educate yourself:

The Shifting Sands of the Single-Bullet Theory
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MOKXTpq1hC5UHrF-JanDjQvzk2q0HvRF/view

JFK's Clothing Proves the Single-Bullet Theory Is Impossible
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MAgWA0frOLVeWY6ok9nzdrgpRN4Wv1AL/view?usp=sharing

Ten Reasons I Reject the Single-Bullet Theory
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-7AW56BXCumXFsOwyN6lE0WTBltOzeYI/view