Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10
31
Given the fact that the KGB* has been zombifying our body politic for 60-plus years with disinformation and "active measures" operations (including JFKA CT scenarios), even if the Democrats had nominated a young Lou Gherig, Babe Ruth, Ted Williams, or [fill in the blank], Vladimir Putin's SVR, FSB, GRU and professional Saint Petersburg trolls (with help from polling data provided by Yanukovych's boy, Manafort, to GRU officer Kilimnik and thence to Deripaska and Putin) would have ensured that The Traitorous Orange Turd "won." 

*Today's SVR and FSB

Given that the Democrats nominated a dead guy in 2020, it's not much of a stretch to think they would nominate 3 dead Hall of Fame baseball players. Anyone of them would have been as effective a POTUS as Biden. An autopen could have replicated any of their signatures.
32
Discussion and argument requires reading what the other person wrote before responding. Pontificating is not argument.

I've read your arguments and I am not impressed.
33
Mann was appointed by LBJ in 1964 as Assistant Secretary for Inter-American (Latin America) Matters and also as head of USAID. Two important jobs. I can't see how that is punishing him for anything. In fact, it looks to me like an vertical career move, a promotion. Reportedly, Mann became quite influential on LBJ's policies towards Latin America. So, how was he punished for raising assassination questions? What was done to him? To his career?

As to Thomas: He thought Oswald perhaps met Cuban agents or pro-Castro people at a party when he was in Mexico City. This was the so-called "twist" party. That party was held on September 30, 1963 or almost two months before the assassination. How do you connect this meeting with Dallas almost two months later?

Even Thomas recognized this problem, of connecting the party to the assassination. In a memo to Secretary of State Rogers in 1969, Thomas wrote (the "Garro" was Elena Garo de Paz, a noted Mexican novelist who said she saw Oswald at this party):



Thoma's complete memo is here: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=954#relPageId=294&search=Charles_Thomas

 
34
My involvement in these ongoing discussions is because the JFKA is a fascinating story with lots of tenacles. That and I enjoy arguing whether it is the JFKA, politics, sports, etc.
Discussion and argument requires reading what the other person wrote before responding. Pontificating is not argument.
35
Why do you blame the Russians for the Democrat Party nominating losers like Gore, Kerry, Hillary, and Kamala?

Given the fact that the KGB* has been zombifying our body politic for 60-plus years with disinformation and "active measures" operations (including JFKA CT scenarios), even if the Democrats had nominated a young Lou Gherig, Babe Ruth, Ted Williams, or [fill in the blank], Vladimir Putin's SVR, FSB, GRU and professional Saint Petersburg trolls (with help from polling data provided by Yanukovych's boy, Manafort, to GRU officer Kilimnik and thence to Deripaska and Putin) would have ensured that The Traitorous Orange Turd "won." 

*Today's SVR and FSB
36
Separated at birth? Coincidence? I think not.

The bottom image, for you ufology-challenged folks, is from famous one-armed Swiss farmer and Pleiadian contactee Billy Meier. Billy endorses nothing but Banquet pot pies.

The question is, which image is cheesier?

OK, I think we're done.




37
I certainly did. A few months after I joined the Ed Forum, I was struck by the leftist-leaning sympathies of seemingly all the participants. They all seemed to have a dreamy-eyed near-worship of JFK and utopian notions of what the country would be like today if he and RFK had lived. I actually started a thread on the topic, which clearly hit a nerve because it was met with howls of umbrage. As it turns out, this was before the emergence of The Donald. The emergence of The Donald has fractured everything so badly that intelligible theories are hard to formulate. My observation would be that LNers tend to be conservative while CTers of the CIA-did-it ilk tend to be liberal, but that's probably painting with too broad a brush. Possibly it's no more complex than "Whatever The Donald finds interesting the MAGA folks ipso facto find interesting." Trump is a wacky conspiracy sort of guy; ergo, we are wacky conspiracy sorts of folks. I don't really see an ideological basis, as I saw at the Ed Forum.

It's funny that a lot of far-left JFKA buffs voted for The Traitorous Orange Turd -- because he promised to release the files on George Joaniddes or some-such thing.

The KGB's multi-decade efforts to get a "useful idiot" (or worse) person like Trump elected finally paid off in 2016, thanks in-part to the efforts of the likes of Joachim Joesten, Thomas G. Buchanan, Mark Lane, overly ambitious, scandal-plagued, and revengeful Jim Garrison, Paese Sera newspaper and Ralph Schoenman, Oliver Stone, Jim DiEugenio, and Oliver Stone (did I already mention him?).
38
What we need is funding to find a cure for TDS.

"Trump Derangement Syndrome" perfectly describes what MAGATS, who, like Trump, simply can't accept the fact that he lost the 2020 election, are suffering from.
39
Your culinary expert cannot in good conscience recommend Banquet frozen dinners. Banquet has, however, perfected the $1 pot pie. 5 minutes in the microwave, let stand in the microwave 5 minutes with a damp paper towel over the top, dump into a dish and squish around, and consume while telling yourself "Hey, it was only a dollar!"
40
I've never seen any correlation between one's political leanings and their views on the JFK assassination. People of all political stripes have come down on both sides of the conspiracy question.

I certainly did. A few months after I joined the Ed Forum, I was struck by the leftist-leaning sympathies of seemingly all the participants. They all seemed to have a dreamy-eyed near-worship of JFK and utopian notions of what the country would be like today if he and RFK had lived. I actually started a thread on the topic, which clearly hit a nerve because it was met with howls of umbrage. As it turns out, this was before the emergence of The Donald. The emergence of The Donald has fractured everything so badly that intelligible theories are hard to formulate. My observation would be that LNers tend to be conservative while CTers of the CIA-did-it ilk tend to be liberal, but that's probably painting with too broad a brush. Possibly it's no more complex than "Whatever The Donald finds interesting the MAGA folks ipso facto find interesting." Trump is a wacky conspiracy sort of guy; ergo, we are wacky conspiracy sorts of folks. I don't really see an ideological basis, as I saw at the Ed Forum.
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10