JFK Assassination Forum

That alone should tell you somethingCE399 showed how that happened.

Yes. It tells me that everyone assumed that JBC was hit by only one bullet.

Your fixation on eyewitnesses while ignoring the hard evidence continues to prevent you from knowing the truth of the assassination.

Statistical corroboration of witnesses is used by the CIA, Mossad, MI5 and every other successful intelligence agency all the time.  They gather information from various sources and determine facts.  Although each piece is individually is not reliable, when the pieces all fit together they are extremely reliable.   That is all I am doing.

If the 9 pages of witness recollections I provided, which fit with the 20+ witness recollections that JFK reacted to the first shot in ways not seen until after z193, which fit together with the motorcade witnesses, Betzner, Phil Willis, Linda Willis, Altgens, Hickey, Greer, and the witnesses along Elm who stated where JFK was in relation to where they were standing at the time of the first shot, were independent, the only rational conclusion is that the last two shots were close together, JFK reacted to the first shot and the first shot was after z186.  In fact the way the three bodies fit together with the zfilm (there is a five second time difference between JFK showing signs of being hit so that must be the first shot according to the shot spacing witnesses. And that fits all the 20+ who said that JFK reacted that way to the first shot.  And that fits with where the witnesses in the motorcade, Elm St. witnesses, photographers etc put the first shot: i.e. after z186) tells you that the witnesses are independent.

There is nothing about your theory that is the least bit compatible with the Z-film. Robin Unger's enhanced Z193 frame shows just how ridiculous your drawing is of how JBC would have to be turned for your scenario to hold water.
I would estimate there is at least a 60 degree difference in the turn of JBC's shoulder between the Z-frame and your drawing. It is preposterous.

? At z193, JBC's shoulders are turned right so that his chest is facing left the sightline from Zapruder, which is 30 degrees. For that to be 60 degrees too far right, you must think JBC is facing to the left of forward in z193.

I made this weigman composite image about 5-years ago.

it shows the bystander standing location, going from the TSBD across to the concrete island.

\  To test the location of the car either parked along the south (or north) curb of the Elm Extension, as seen in the Wiegman film, I plotted Wiegman’s position with test south curb versus north curb cars on a DP map. The plot showed the north curb car about twice the distance from the camera compared to a south curb car. Then for equal sized cars the north curb car would appear about one half the size of the south curb car to Wiegman’s camera.  I made a quick 3D view animation to demonstrate this and added a 5.5’ black suit man for comparison. It looks to me that the Wiegman car is nearer to the south curb. Note that I gave the test cars a steel-blue color (not white) for the 3D animation for modeling development use.

 

    If Wiegman filmed a parked car: (1) Alongside the Island, (2) Behind the traffic light (3) 17.5 Feet Long, (4) Almost 5 Feet High, just show it to me. Wiegman filmed this area while simultaneously turning a corner and panning his camera. He filmed this Island area from many different angles/perspectives. People want to relay on the JFK Assassination Images until they don't.
    I Challenge YOU. "Show Me The Car"

   I know you guys and Cronkite enjoy echoing the Nova "test" stuff Ad nauseam. But, how about just telling this Forum what YOU see? Do you see: (1) A Pristine Bullet/CE 399? (2) JFK's head explode on contact?  People want to rely on the JFK Assassination "images" until they don't.