JFK Assassination Forum

I rarely miss an episode of Gutfeld. I record it every night in case I fall asleep before it's over so I can watch it the next morning with my coffee. I even attended his show when he came to the small town of Loudonville, OH, about 50 minutes north of where I live. Last week, was the first time I've heard him use that line. I even attended his show when he came to the small town of Loudonville, OH, about 50 minutes north of where I live. Is it possible he has used that line before and I just didn't see it. Of course it is, but I didn't get it from him and I doubt he got it from me.

No wonder you're such a [you-know-what].

No wonder you're such a [you-know-what].

Any straight forward examination of the available evidence in the JFKA yields only one plausible explanation and that is the one the WC reached almost 62 years ago. While we have discovered somethings that have cleared up questions the WC was unable to resolve, their basic conclusion remains sound with no revisions necessary. Oswald did it and there is no evidence he had even a single accomplice..

It was Oswald's rifle found on the sixth floor. It had his palmprint on the underside of the barrel which could only have been put there with the rifle disassembled which it would have to have been in order to fit inside the bag found next to the sniper's nest. Oswald's palmprint was also on the bottom of the bag. Fibers matching the blanket he used to store the rifle were found in the bag and fibers matching the shirt he was wearing that day were found on the butt plate of the rifle. The rifle was positively matched to the shells found by the window where several people saw a shooter. The rifle was also positively matched to the only two recovered bullets. Oswald's fingerprints were found on top of the boxes that had been stacked by the window in question oriented just as they would be if Oswald was kneeling at those boxes looking down Elm St. Every qualified medical examiner who has reviewed the autopsy materials has agreed with the findings of the original autopsy team that JFK was shot twice from above and behind him. There is no medical evidence or any other forensic evidence of another shooter firing from any other location in Dealey Plaza. These are facts.

On top of all the forensic evidence of Oswald's guilt, he flees the scene of the crime, fetches his revolver from his rooming house and a short time later guns down a cop who stopped to question him. About a dozen people either witnessed the shooting or identified Oswald fleeing the scene of that crime. A short time later, Oswald was arrested with the murder weapon in the cop killing in his possession after attempting to shoot one of the arresting with the same gun.

These facts tell us unambiguously that Oswald killed two men on 11/22/1963, yet for some people, that simply isn't good enough. For some strange reason, they feel compelled to look for conspiracies. They will invent any excuse imaginable to dismiss each and every piece of evidence that Oswald was a double murderer. Then they will turn around and dream up bizarre conspiracy theories from the flimsiest evidence or no evidence at all. Just factoids. They are chasing ghosts and have been for over 62 years. Their futility in finding no credible evidence of any other person's involvement in the assassination doesn't discourage them. They continue on their never-ending snipe hunts convinced the piece of evidence that will finally prove there was a conspiracy is right around the corner. Perhaps we should use a modern term for what drives these people. Oswald Derangement Syndrome.

Of course, CTs are not alone in dreaming up alternate realities. Perhaps the most famous was Jim Moore's book Conspiracy of One which put a different twist on the LN theory. Let's not forget our own Andrew Mason who has dreamed up a theory that requires about a dozen bizarre, improbable, and impossible things to have happened.

Dale Meyers has said it best. The JFKA happened one way and we now have an even clearer picture than what the WC was able to present. Oswald fired an early first shot that missed. There is some question as to exactly when that shot was fired because the Z-film doesn't give us definitive evidence as to when that shot was fired. It does show us JBC reacting to the first shot by rotating his shoulders to his right at Z164, just as he said he did. This tells us the first shot was fired some time before that. The second shot fired at or about Z220 struck JFK high on his back to the right of his spine, exited his throat, tumbled into JBC's back near his armpit, exited below his right nipple, struck and shattered his right wrist before making a shallow wound in his thigh. A third shot was fired at Z310-311 which struck JFK in the back of the head at Z313 causing a massive, unsurvivable brain injury causing his deata a short time later. This us the one way the JFKA happened. Anybody who believes otherwise is only fooling themselves.

     Uncle Miltie - Instead of giving me credit for Discovering this "getaway" car NOT being on the Wiegman Film, you want to leap frog into our recently discovered Image Evidence regarding the DPD reaction to the car. 62+ years and nobody noticed this car Not being on the Wiegman Film? I still have "curtain calls" to take before we clue self admitted "Dead Weight" such as yourself in.
                        I have managed to arouse your curiosity. This is a step in the right direction and a feather in my cap. Now, if I can only get you "off the dime" and actively researching the JFK Assassination once again. That's a serious challenge.   

You've put so many feathers in your cap you have a warbonnet now. The only thing you've aroused in me are the chuckles I get from reading your insane theories. There was no getaway car. The fact that the car in question doesn't appear in the Wiegman film isn't evidence of anything. You have assumed the DPD reacted to the car but provided no evidence of such. I have pointed out three very basic items for which you have provided ZERO evidence. You have assumed all of these things to be true. Despite the challenge, you still can't provide evidence. What exactly should anybody give you credit for. Dreaming up a goofy theory out of thin air? If I did that, I would be obliged to do the same for all the other CTs I've engage with over the years who have also cooked up some insane theories with no evidence to support them. I will credit you for taking goofiness to a whole new level.

He realized he had been framed.  He feared that his life was in danger.

If Oswald had been in the 2nd floor lunchroom at the time of the shooting as most deniers of his guilt seem to believe, why would he think he had been framed. He wouldn't even have known JFK had been shot until Mrs. Reid told him shots had been fired but she wasn't even sure he had been hit. He had been confronted by a cop with his gun drawn but wasn't detained after Truly vouched for him. If Oswald had been innocently eating his lunch when the shots were fired, what reason would he have to believe he was being framed for the shooting? Do CTs ever bother to think things through before they dream up these wild ideas?