Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10
31
   SHANKS -                       " Imaginary policemen mingling freely among real policemen...."

                    The above is YOUR CLAIM. This Bogus Motorcycle Cop kept entirely to himself. He never "mingled" with anyone, whether it was a "real policemen" or a Joe 6 Pack. Where did you come up with the above claim? I am always interested in New Evidence, whether it be Image Evidence or an Eyewitness recalling whatever they claim to have seen. Or, did you make the above claim up?     

If you can't find new evidence, you just make it up.
32
OK. Just clear up what your position is.

Did the DPD take possession of the car, yes or no.

If your answer is no, why do you think it was a getaway car?

If your answer if yes, provide us with your evidence.


                                                                          "You Know Nothing, Jon Snow"

     You think that this as a dead/closed case. This is your Lame Excuse for Not doing any further JFK Assassination Research. That is sad. Very sad.
      I have laid out my various positions throughout this extremely popular thread. And I have unearthed New Evidence during its' tenure.  Get off of your duff and read through this thread. You should have done this prior to doing all of your huffing-and-puffing.
33
    Am I serious about the JFK Assassination. Sure I am. It is an Unsolved MURDER. I do serious research. This helps to prevent my having to go back and "edit" a post, like You were just forced to do. You know, "Measure twice, Cut once". Or maybe you don't?

Starting to get under Royell's 72-year-old skin, which is always a good thing. Yes, I edit most of my posts because I'm fussy about typos, and often something exceedingly witty occurs to me to add. I do find your propensity to Capitalize words Completely at random odd but Curiously endearing; it enhances the Overall weirdness of your posts.

You have failed to address my inquiry as to why Bogus Haygood looks exactly like Real Haygood, glove or no glove. This seems to me rather an obvious question that cries out for an answer. Run this past your team of serious researchers who are supposedly working behind the scenes and who agree that you are on the verge of finally solving the case. If they slap their foreheads and lament "Ya know, Bogus does kinda look like Real Haygood," this will provide you with fodder for at least another six threads before you hit upon the shape-shifting reptilian alien angle (oh, shoot - I gave it away, didn't I?).
34
I didn't think it was possible but your empty speculation gets more and more ridiculous as time goes on. Conspirators holding special "objects" so as to identify them as "friendly" to their other conspirators? Imaginary policemen mingling freely among real policemen and nobody notices or says a word? Delusional!

   SHANKS -                       " Imaginary policemen mingling freely among real policemen...."

                    The above is YOUR CLAIM. This Bogus Motorcycle Cop kept entirely to himself. He never "mingled" with anyone, whether it was a "real policemen" or a Joe 6 Pack. Where did you come up with the above claim? I am always interested in New Evidence, whether it be Image Evidence or an Eyewitness recalling whatever they claim to have seen. Or, did you make the above claim up?     
35
     When did I claim that, ".....the DPD took POSSESSION of the car in question"? I NEVER posted that. You are NOW Continually blowing off that I "claimed" this and that. Please post where I made the claim that, "the DPD took POSSESSION of the car in question". I'll wait for your response.

OK. Just clear up what your position is.

Did the DPD take possession of the car, yes or no.

If your answer is no, why do you think it was a getaway car?

If your answer if yes, provide us with your evidence.
36
    Am I serious about the JFK Assassination. Sure I am. It is an Unsolved MURDER.

Actually, it was solved during the first 12 hours.
Quote

I do serious research. This helps to prevent my having to go back and "edit" a post, like You were just forced to do. You know, "Measure twice, Cut once". Or maybe you don't?

I'm trying to imagine how goofy your theories would be if you weren't serious.

I just thought about it. They wouldn't be any goofier than they are now.
37
       There are No Facts being presented to refute the above being a Bogus Motorcycle Cop. Only insults and snide comments are ever "presented".
       This Bogus Motorcycle Cop being filmed with DPD Officer Harkness and Buddy Walthers, means he can Not be DPD Motorcycle Officer Haygood. Haygood made a documented 12:35 police radio transmission from his motorcycle parked near the Triple Underpass. Plus, this Bogus Motorcycle Cop is Missing: (1) A Motorcycle Glove, (2) Sunglasses, and, (3) A Motorcycle. Officer Haygood had ALL 3 of these items.

Just go on and keep embarrassing yourself. Do you ever wonder why NOBODY here, or on any other JFK forum or web site, believes your crap either? If you're such a sleuth, wouldn't your fellow conspiracy nuts be singing your praises left and right for finally uncovering the dastardly secret of the gloveless impostor policeman ??
38
I'm not claiming anything. There are many signed copies of this photo on eBay and auction sites in which CLYDE HAYGOOD claimed this was him. I believe Haygood is the officer still on his motorcycle.

I kind of enjoy Jake Maxwell because his posts are always good-humored and (it seems to me) slightly tongue-in-cheek. Yours are simply depressing. That there are people who actually occupy the alternate universe that you seem to occupy is simply depressing.

Here's the same photo with a better Haygood signature. It says "This photo depicts Haygood as he is bringing his Harley to a stop on Elm Street, less than 30 seconds after the shots were fired." Anyway, Clyde said one of these two was him, and I'm going with Clyde on this, particularly since I've now paid $1,027.89 for ten copies.

https://thumbs.worthpoint.com/zoom/images1/1/0716/27/clyde-haygood-dallas-police-motor_1_c10ad18cc764979c2d766cc7962a8600.jpg

    Am I serious about the JFK Assassination. Sure I am. It is an Unsolved MURDER. I do serious research. This helps to prevent my having to go back and "edit" a post, like You were just forced to do. You know, "Measure twice, Cut once". Or maybe you don't?
39
I'm not claiming anything. There are many signed copies of this photo on eBay and auction sites in which CLYDE HAYGOOD claimed this was him. I believe Haygood is the officer still on his motorcycle.

I kind of enjoy Jake Maxwell because his posts are always good-humored and (it seems to me) slightly tongue-in-cheek. Yours are simply depressing. That there are people who actually occupy the alternate universe that you seem to occupy is simply depressing.

Here's the same photo with a better Haygood signature. It says "This photo depicts Haygood as he is bringing his Harley to a stop on Elm Street, less than 30 seconds after the shots were fired." Anyway, Clyde said one of these two was him, and I'm going with Clyde on this, particularly since I've now paid $1,027.89 for ten copies.

https://thumbs.worthpoint.com/zoom/images1/1/0716/27/clyde-haygood-dallas-police-motor_1_c10ad18cc764979c2d766cc7962a8600.jpg
40
It's very simple. Either the DPD took possession of the car or they didn't. I'm not talking about immobilizing the car for which you are the only source. I'm talking about seizing it for evidence. You've never provided any evidence that happened. You seem to operate under the premise that the default explanation for every unknown factor is the one the conforms to your fantasy. That's not how it works. If you want to claim that the DPD took possession of the car in question, the onus is on you to provide evidence that is what happened. Otherwise there's no reason for anyone else to believe what you have simply assumed.

     When did I claim that, ".....the DPD took POSSESSION of the car in question"? I NEVER posted that. You are NOW Continually blowing off that I "claimed" this and that. Please post where I made the claim that, "the DPD took POSSESSION of the car in question". I'll wait for your response.   
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10