Paul Landis passed the rather high hurdle to becoming a Secret Service agent, left with an unblemished record, and has never even been accused of sensationalism, publicity-seeking, ideological extremism, or delusions in the years after he left the Secret Service.

So how is Paul Landis not a solid guy?

     Humes was Not informed of this BULLET, (not a Fragment or a slug), being found. This is why he frantically had JFK X-Rayed from head to toe. You're popping off and revealing how shallow your JFK Assassination knowledge is. Getaway from the keyboard and do some serious research.   

    Back wound was from a sub sonic round used by sniper to reduce noise, and making the through and through back shot to leave a small exit hole as slug hit nothing hard to distort slug making a big exit hole.

Now that voice stress analysis (VSA) technology has become widely used by intelligence and law enforcement agencies all over the world, George O'Toole's PSE analysis of Oswald's declaration of innocence poses a serious challenge to the lone-gunman theory. The PSE, i.e., the Psychological Stress Evaluator, was the first patented VSA device. Most of what follows is an abbreviated version of my section on O'Toole's Oswald PSE analysis in my article "Faulty Evidence: Problems with the Case Against Lee Harvey Oswald."

When O'Toole became aware of the PSE and the evidence of its reliability, he decided to analyze Oswald's declaration of innocence with the PSE. Much to his surprise, the PSE charts on Oswald's statement showed an almost complete lack of stress, a very strong indicator he was telling the truth when he said he didn't shoot anyone.

Realizing the historic significance of his finding, O'Toole decided to have two leading PSE experts, Mike Kradz and Lloyd Hitchcock, review his Oswald PSE charts. Significantly, O'Toole did not tell Kradz whose PSE charts he was analyzing. He simply told him the charts were of a person who had been accused of murder and who had denied it. O'Toole told Hitchcock up front whose PSE charts he was analyzing. 

Both Kradz and Hitchcock concluded the PSE charts showed Oswald was telling the truth when he said he didn't shoot anyone. Hitchcock even did his own PSE analysis of Oswald's innocence declaration to confirm this finding.

But O'Toole didn't stop there. He next asked an unlikely source, Dr. Gordon Barland of the University of Utah, to assess the Oswald PSE charts. Dr. Barland was a well-known and respected polygraph examiner. He conducted lie-detection research at the University of Utah. His research was often published in the Journal of the American Polygraph Association. Before he became a professor at the University of Utah, Dr. Barland was a polygraph examiner in Army intelligence and worked on the Department of Defense’s Joint Working Group on Lie Detection. Unlike many other polygraph examiners, Dr. Barland did not summarily dismiss VSA technology but was willing to test it; after doing so, he concluded it was reliable. 

Dr. Barland conducted his own PSE analysis of the recording of Oswald’s assertion of innocence. He found “a complete lack of stress in Oswald’s statement that he had not shot anyone,” and concluded that “Oswald appeared to be telling the truth when he proclaimed his innocence” (O’Toole, The Assassination Tapes, 1975, pp. 137-138).

When the first VSA machine, the Dektor company's PSE, was patented and began to gain acceptance, the polygraph industry, led by the American Polygraph Association, launched a frontal assault on the PSE and on VSA technology in general. Of course, VSA technology posed a threat to the polygraph industry's profits and threatened to put some polygraphers out of work.

Long story short, the polygraph industry eventually lost the debate because enough honest scientists and law enforcement experts tested and analyzed VSA technology and found it to be reliable. Of course, like any lie-detection machine, poorly trained or dishonest technicians may misuse it and produce invalid results, but this is relatively rare. Invalid VSA results are less frequent than invalid traditional polygraph results.

Today, literally thousands of law enforcement departments/agencies around the world use VSA devices for lie detection. The most commonly used VSA machine is the Computer Voice Stress Analyzer (CVSA), and there are over 5,000 certified CVSA analysts in the U.S. alone. More than 200 non-police security, intelligence, and military units around the world use VSA devices, including units in the U.S., England, New Zealand, and South Korea. It is no secret that the CIA makes extensive use of VSA technology for lie detection.

So we’re supposed to believe that just ONE SS agent all by himself, no others around him, made a search of the limo ( and no one else saw him doing so) and found a bullet on the backseat which had been missed by dozens of other people surrounding the limo and guarding the limo at time it was at the Bethesda hospital?