Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10
31
JC-

Thanks for your comments.

Even if we ignore Jackie K's reaction, we see JFK at Z-226, obviously struck:

https://assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z226.jpg

JBC is sitting bolt upright at Z-226. JBC's testimony is the shot that struck him in his back pushed him forward.

I will run with JBC's version of what happened to himself on this one. Witnesses can be in error, we all know that.

But JBC remembering receiving a blow in the back and getting pushed forward...that seems basic.

Hard to tell when JBC was struck, and the exact orientation of his torso. I concede all of that, which is why i say about Z-295. Might be later. The second gunsel was perhaps not in the TSBD.

JBC getting struck ~z-295 also lines up with many witnesses who heard a "bang.....bang-bang" cadence.

---

We are on different pages on this one, but that happens in JFKA discussions.

I respect your views, I just disagree.

Hi Ben, when all the individual facts are analysed, the SBF(Single Bullet Fact) is the only possible conclusion.

Dr Gregory said the wound was a linear wound and by his size description the bullet entry had to have hit at either a more obtuse angle or a tumbling bullet and since we know the bullets path through Connally this effectively rules out an obtuse angle.



Mr. SPECTER - What did the wound of entry look like, Doctor?
Dr. GREGORY - It appeared to me that the wound of entry was sort of a linear wound, perhaps three-quarters of an inch in length with a rounded central portion. Whereas, the wound of exit was rather larger than this, perhaps an inch and a half across.


And as the WC investigated, a full on bullet smashes, Connally's wrist wound was only a fracture therefore caused by a slower moving bullet.





Dr Gregory again describes a chaotically moving bullet.

Mr. SPECTER - Dr. Gregory, what was then the relative size of the wounds on the back and front side of the wrist itself?
Dr. GREGORY - As I recall them, the wound dimensions would be so far as the wound on the back of the wrist is concerned about a haft a centimeter by two and a half centimeters in length. It was rather linear in nature. The upper end of it having apparently lost some tissue was gapping more than the lower portion of it.


Dr Lattimer did a lot of practical experiments, in the following image Lattimer reproduced Kennedy's neck with a suitable substitute, and the resulting trajectory in the distance between Kennedy and Connally was a tumbling bullet, which as seen in nearly all cases caused a "linear" wound, the same type of wound as seen by Gregory on Connally. This evidence alone is powerful incontrovertible evidence but there is much more evidence, much more!



For a change, here's the Zapruder film reversed and it's easy to see Connally and Kennedy are both reacting simultaneously.



As Connally emerges from behind the sign his jacket billows as CE399 and the expulsion of matter passes through and his right shoulder thrusts forward as his left shoulder violently raises.



At the same split second both Connally and Kennedy react simultaneously



Connally's hat flip and look of immense pain happen before Z230.



JohnM
32
JC-

Thanks for your comments.

Even if we ignore Jackie K's reaction, we see JFK at Z-226, obviously struck:

https://assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z226.jpg

JBC is sitting bolt upright at Z-226. JBC's testimony is the shot that struck him in his back pushed him forward.

I will run with JBC's version of what happened to himself on this one. Witnesses can be in error, we all know that.

But JBC remembering receiving a blow in the back and getting pushed forward...that seems basic.

Hard to tell when JBC was struck, and the exact orientation of his torso. I concede all of that, which is why i say about Z-295. Might be later. The second gunsel was perhaps not in the TSBD.

JBC getting struck ~z-295 also lines up with many witnesses who heard a "bang.....bang-bang" cadence.

---

We are on different pages on this one, but that happens in JFKA discussions.

I respect your views, I just disagree.



33
Either an impostor or another cop whose name you don't know. I know which one I am betting on.

Royell is part of the old guard and has been studying this case for many decades and since he and his clan have not found even a sliver of evidence for conspiracy, they are now reduced to making outlandish claims on whatever morsel they can find.

But here, at the end of the day, having an "imposter" officer parading around nearly five minutes later while wearing a helmet which sticks out like dogs proverbials goes where exactly?
What narrative actually fits an easy to find "imposter" suddenly turning up and taking off a glove and still walking around five minutes later? It's absurd!

JohnM
34
   Not only is Witt's HSCA testimony contrary to the JFK Assassination images of Umbrella Man, if you watch Witt's HSCA testimony, he handles what looks to be a heavy water pitcher. He does this with his (L) hand. As we see above, Umbrella Man is pumping his umbrella with his (R) hand. It would have been interesting to see Witt sign his HSCA Testimony. Atticus Finch would have been all over this.

Did you even watch the entire video or will you just take a tiny slice out of context??


Louie Steven Witt throughout the entire video gestures with his right hand. And the majority of the time fidgets with his glasses while simultaneously gesturing using his right hand.



As for the water pitcher, take careful note of the position of Witt, he's centered on the sizable microphone and also observe the location of the water pitcher on Witt's left.



And as is plain to see, the ergonomics of reaching across himself through the centralized microphone would be incredibly awkward so Witt naturally pours himself a glass of water with his left hand, a simple act of co-ordination that he no doubt mastered since being a child.



BTW it's ironic that you'd allude to a fictional defence attorney, perhaps next time you'd be better off seeking assistance from a "Vincent Bugliosi" who would look at the entirety of a man's behaviour and would not attempt to build an entire case from a singular explainable action.

JohnM



35
   "Another cop"? When we 1st see him on the Darnell Film, he is deep inside the railroad yard, WALKING along the string of passenger train cars. When we last see him, he is leaving the railroad yard and WALKING toward/down the Elm St Ext. If this guy is really "another cop", where is his 2 Wheel Motorcycle? This "No Glove Cop"was Never attached to a 2 Wheel motorcycle. He is an impostor and heading toward the TSBD.

Keep telling yourself that and maybe someday it will come true. Don't forget to tap your ruby slippers together.
36
I haven’t seen the footage that shows one glove missing from Michael Jackson

 :D :D



   12:38 PM + No Glove + No 2 Wheel Motorcycle = NOT Motorcycle Officer Haygood. He is an impostor and heading directly toward the TSBD.
37
Either an impostor or another cop whose name you don't know. I know which one I am betting on.

   "Another cop"? When we 1st see him on the Darnell Film, he is deep inside the railroad yard, WALKING along the string of passenger train cars. When we last see him, he is leaving the railroad yard and WALKING toward/down the Elm St Ext. If this guy is really "another cop", where is his 2 Wheel Motorcycle? This "No Glove Cop"was Never attached to a 2 Wheel motorcycle. He is an impostor and heading toward the TSBD.
38
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: U.S. Politics
« Last post by John Corbett on April 03, 2026, 08:41:34 PM »
It's disingenuous of you and other Trump supporters to accuse Mueller, et al., of failing to prove collusion when "collusion" isn't a legal concept, crime, or theory of liability in U.S. criminal law.

So you agree that Mueller didn't prove a crime by the Trump campaign. We are making progress.
39
   The alleged motorcycle cop we see above is missing 1 glove. Motorcycle Officer Haygood was wearing both gloves that day. And just what is this alleged motorcycle cop holding in the other hand? What's the purpose of his suddenly displaying this object? He was Not holding it earlier when Darnell filmed him walking along the string of passenger train cars.
   The above Darnell still frame has a 12:34 PM timestamp. It is physically impossible for Motorcycle Officer Haygood and Officer Harkness to be filmed together at 12:34. Officer Harkness established the above security checkpoint after being ordered to do so by Inspector Sawyer. Inspector Sawyer did not arrive at the TSBD until 12:35 PM. There is NO WAY that Officer Haygood and Officer Harkness were filmed together at 12:34 PM. That is impossible. The alleged motorcycle officer above is an impostor.

Either an impostor or another cop whose name you don't know. I know which one I am betting on.
40
Does your "MacRae" reference reflect back on Kamp? I believe that you follow him closer than I do.
I don't follow Bart Kamp.

Darnell + Willis = Prayer Woman

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10