Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10
31
I haven’t seen the footage that shows one glove missing from Michael Jackson

 :D :D



      It is physically impossible for Motorcycle Officer Haygood and Officer Harkness to be filmed together in the Darnell still frame above. That is Not Officer Haygood. The man wearing a DPD Motorcycle Officer's Uniform/White Helmet is an impostor. (1) Where did this impostor come from? (2) Who is he? (3) Where is his motorcycle? (4) Where is he going?
32
After leaving the RR yard Murray stood on the grassy knoll and photographed the crowd gathered on N Elm, including the area near the parked motorcycle of Clyde Haygood. His helmet is visible in the photo near his bike. Murray also caught the north peristyle wall with an advancing shadow moving southward about 3-4” per minute. Modeling this wall shadow allows an estimation of the time as 12:36.


My original posting on this technique can be found in this forum here.
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2013.msg54679.html#google_vignette

    The above further proves that the motorcycle cop on the Darnell Film still frame is NOT Officer Haygood. We see Officer Haygood above at 12:36 near his motorcycle at the Elm St curb. How can Officer Haygood be on that Darnell Still Frame with Officer Harkness? Harkness made a documented 12:36 radio transmission that he was bringing an eyewitness/Amos Euins to the TSBD. After doing this, Harkness then secured the rear of the TSBD. This is where we see Harkness above. Officer Harkness is securing the rear of the TSBD as the alleged Motorcycle Officer Haygood walks passed him. The above further proves Haygood can NOT be on the Darnell still frame. This is a Slam Dunk. That DPD Motorcycle Officer on the Darnell Film is an impostor.
33
According to Detective Buddy Walters, there were a number of officers in that particular area at that time. Why did you identify the two officers as Harkness and Haygood?

Mr. WALTHERS. And at that time I heard the shots as well as everybody else, but as we got over this fence, and a lot of officers and people were just rummaging through the train yards back in this parking area.
Mr. LIEBELER. In the parking area down there? West of the Texas School Book Depository Building between the Texas School Book Depository and the railroad tracks?
Mr. WALTHERS. Yes; and the discussion came up among several of the officers, "Were there any shots fired?" And I said, "Well, they sounded like rifle shots to me." At the time no one knew---in our crowd they were sure the shots had been fired though because of the reports---we heard the noise, and I left then and went back up here and came back onto the street.

    There is a difference between a DPD "Officer" and a DPD Motorcycle Officer. A DPD motorcycle officer always wears a DPD UNIFORM and wears a White Helmet. DPD  Officer Buddy Walthers and DPD Officer Roger Craig were wearing dress suits that day. DPD Officer Luke Mooney was also wearing a dress suit. All 3 of these DPD Officers were wearing suits and were back inside the railroad yard immediately after the kill shot. There were other DPD Officers back inside the railroad yard that were wearing suits. This is what Buddy Walthers was referring to. DPD Officers that were wearing suits.   
34
RS:  I am talking about the dirt road portion of the Elm St Extension.

So why did you bring up the limo turn and traffic signal in the Wegman film?

there are NO BOLLARDS between Officer Harkness and this alleged motorcycle cop.

Yes there are! Not only can you see many of them in the Darnell film, others are made obvious when the motorcycle cop walks behind them.

Here, bollards are outlined in red. Note that one is in Harkness' shadow:


Here, "B" marks where the line of bollards is. You can see that two of them are silhouetted by the MC as he walks behind them:


Here he is a half step later:


   The image above is a "cropped" Darnell Film still frame. Buddy Walthers is actually included in this still frame. He is pictured to the extreme (L) on this same still frame. The 2 DPD Police Officers in this photo have for 62+ years been ID'd as being DPD Motorcycle Officer Haygood, (wearing the White Helmet), and Officer Harkness. Officer Haygood is the ONLY DPD MOTORCYCLE COP to have been back inside the railroad immediately after the kill shot.  At 12:35 PM, Haygood made a documented radio transmission from his motorcycle parked on the Elm St curb near the Triple Underpass. That is why this still frame has always been time stamped 12:34 PM. Officer Haygood had to be back at his motorcycle by 12:35 to make that 12:35 radio transmission. The other DPD Cop on this still frame is Officer Harkness. Harkness made a documented 12:36 police radio transmission. On that transmission, Officer Harkness said he had an eyewitness that he was bringing to the TSBD. Harkness then put this eyewitness/Amos Euins on the back of this 3 Wheel Motorcycle and took Euins to the TSBD. When Harkness arrived at the TSBD with the eyewitness/Amos Euins, he was instructed to place Euins inside Inspector Sawyer's car. Inspector Sawyer arrived at the TSBD at 12:35. The loading of Euins into Sawyer's car would be happening at 12:37. Upon finishing with the loading of Euins into the car, Officer Harkness was instructed to go and secure the area behind the TSBD. This is where we see Officer Harkness on the above Darnell still frame. Officer Harkness is securing the rear of the TSBD. The CORRECT TIME STAMP for the still frame above would therefore be 12:38. The motorcycle officer in the white helmet that we see above in this Darnell still frame can NOT BE Officer Haygood. Officer Haygood was back at his motorcycle making a documented police transmission at 12:35. After making that 12:35 radio transmission, Haygood then stayed there alongside his motorcycle and interviewed JFK Assassination Eyewitnesses. With Officer Haygood being the only known DPD Motorcycle Cop inside the railroad yard immediately following the kill shot, reveals this motorcycle cop we see in the above Darnell still frame to be an impostor. This begs the following questions:  (1) Who is this impostor? (2) Where is his motorcycle? (3) Where did he come from? (4) Where is he going?   
35

This overlay might help some recognize the very profile of a sniper in the pergola window...


36
   12:34 PM - The above showing Motorcycle Officer Haygood is IMPOSSIBLE. Haygood and Officer Harkness could not be filmed together at 12:34. Without question impossible. This alleged motorcycle officer is an impostor. (1) Who is he? (2) Where is his motorcycle? (3) What is he holding? (4) Where is he headed?

According to Detective Buddy Walters, there were a number of officers in that particular area at that time. Why did you identify the two officers as Harkness and Haygood?

Mr. WALTHERS. And at that time I heard the shots as well as everybody else, but as we got over this fence, and a lot of officers and people were just rummaging through the train yards back in this parking area.
Mr. LIEBELER. In the parking area down there? West of the Texas School Book Depository Building between the Texas School Book Depository and the railroad tracks?
Mr. WALTHERS. Yes; and the discussion came up among several of the officers, "Were there any shots fired?" And I said, "Well, they sounded like rifle shots to me." At the time no one knew---in our crowd they were sure the shots had been fired though because of the reports---we heard the noise, and I left then and went back up here and came back onto the street.

 
37
RS:  I am talking about the dirt road portion of the Elm St Extension.

So why did you bring up the limo turn and traffic signal in the Wegman film?

there are NO BOLLARDS between Officer Harkness and this alleged motorcycle cop.

Yes there are! Not only can you see many of them in the Darnell film, others are made obvious when the motorcycle cop walks behind them.

Here, bollards are outlined in red. Note that one is in Harkness' shadow:


Here, "B" marks where the line of bollards is. You can see that two of them are silhouetted by the MC as he walks behind them:


Here he is a half step later:


   12:34 PM - The above showing Motorcycle Officer Haygood is IMPOSSIBLE. Haygood and Officer Harkness could not be filmed together at 12:34. Without question impossible. This alleged motorcycle officer is an impostor. (1) Who is he? (2) Where is his motorcycle? (3) What is he holding? (4) Where is he headed?
38
And you're an impostor of someone who actually knows how to properly analyze films and photos.

  Why aren't you jumping all over that horrible "analyzing" of Willis 21/Prayer Man  BS: in the thread above?  Why aren't you there? Go do your Chef Tony with the Ginsu Knives routine over there. It's not hard to do over there if you have a broad based JFK Assassination foundation. I just blew that "analysis" up. But maybe needing a broad based JFK Assassination Foundation immediately cancels you out? Or is it simply your suffering from SDS? 
39
We don't need Groden or the Wiegman film to confirm to the crazies that it isn't Oswald in the Doorway.
A simple comparison with Photograph Willis 21 clearly shows that Prayerman is really Prayerwoman.




We don't need Groden or the Wiegman film to confirm to the crazies that it isn't Oswald in the Doorway.
A simple comparison with Photograph Willis 21 clearly shows that Prayerman is really Prayerwoman.





We don't need Groden or the Wiegman film to confirm to the crazies that it isn't Oswald in the Doorway.
A simple comparison with Photograph Willis 21 clearly shows that Prayerman is really Prayerwoman.




   Seriously? Where's the, "JFK Evidence Police" when you need them?  I intentionally have waited 24hrs for these Don Quixote's to come charging outta the woodwork and challenge the above "evidence". These are the same people that climb my tree when I: (1) Cut down their worshiped Kamp, (2) Proved "That Ain't Haygood", and, (3) Proved " The car is not in the Wiegman Film". Where are they Now? They are now content to simply stand around with their thumb up their caboose. You know who you are!
   I have never bought into the Prayer Man being Oswald stuff. Never! Never seen any evidence to validate that claim. Prayer Man could be anybody, male or female. But to try to disprove it was Oswald by submitting Willis 21? Really? Willis 21 was snapped around 30 minutes after the Kill Shot. And now you wanna compare a figure on Willis 21, to a figure from 30 Seconds after the Kill Shot? This is laughable. Yet, the "JFK Evidence Police" have suddenly disappeared? I guarantee you that if the name Storing was attached to this, we would being seeing WW 3. "Storing Derangement Syndrome" (SDS) is real. 
   I don't mind being held to a higher standard than anyone else around here. I am used to that. I feed off of that. It is why I have made the 2 biggest discoveries around here in years. (1)That Ain't Haygood, and (2) The car is NOT on the Wiegman Film. Groundbreaking! All I ask is that you also demand a modicum of "evidence" from others. Your failure to do so is reducing this place to "Face Book" status. 
40
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: U.S. Politics
« Last post by John Corbett on Yesterday at 03:51:55 PM »
ME: What were the specific conclusions of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence regarding whether or not Russia had interfered in the 2016 election?

GROK: The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI), in its bipartisan five-volume report on Russian Active Measures Campaigns and Interference in the 2016 U.S. Election (released across 2019–2020, with the final Volume 5 on August 18, 2020), reached the following specific conclusions regarding Russian interference:

Russia conducted an aggressive, multifaceted influence operation aimed at the 2016 presidential election. The Committee explicitly found that the Russian government engaged in an aggressive, multi-faceted effort to influence, or attempt to influence, the outcome of the 2016 presidential election.


Newsflash: The Soviets/Russians have been meddling in our elections for as long as anyone can remember and we have meddled in theirs. There isn't an iota of evidence that any of these efforts has affected the outcome of a single election. Democrats don't want to admit one of the reasons Trump beat Hillary and Kamala is because the Democrats nominated losers. Hillary is one of the worst candidates in recent memory. From the time she first sought elective office, her poll numbers have always peaked at the start of her campaign and then tumbled before the votes were cast. That was true of her run for the Senate which she won anyway. That was true in 2008 when despite having the Democrat establishment on her side, she still managed to lose the nomination to a relative newcomer by the name of Barack Obama. She would have repeated that feat in 2016 if the Democrat establishment hadn't put their thumb on the scale through the use of unelected superdelegates who ensured it would be the party establishment that would choose the nominee, not the primary voters. Otherwise Bernie Sanders would likely have won the nomination. Once handed the nomination, she managed to lose a general election almost every pundit didn't think was possible.

Kamala might have been even worse. In 2020, she was polling 4th in her home state when she dropped out of the race before the first primary or caucus. Still Sleepy Joe Biden was told to pick her as his running mate in what was obviously a DEI hire. The plan was for Joe to get elected masquerading as a moderate, then Joe was supposed to step aside, either midway through his term but at the latest, before the 2024 primary season. Joe screwed them over when he refused to step aside as he had promised. Knowing they couldn't hide Biden's severe mental decline any longer, the Democrat establishment sabotaged Joe by taking the unprecedented step of scheduling the first debate a month before the conventions knowing it was likely Joe would have a disastrous debate which would give them justification to remove him from the ticket. It worked. The Democrats took the unprecedented, undemocratic step of rejecting the person who won all the primaries and arbitrarily chose Kamala Harris to be their nominee. Over the next 107 days, Kamala made a bonfire out of $1.5 billion and turned a 3% lead in the average of the polls into a 2% defeat in the election, losing every single swing state in the process.

And of course, rather than accept any accountability for their poor choice of candidates, the party chose to blame Russian influence for their own failures. They even went so far as to burn their own post-mortem report which would have disclosed their incompetence. The ultimate irony is that this is the party that claims they are fighting for democracy. Democrats claim to love democracy until democracy kicks their asses which it frequently does. Then they do everything in their power to delegitimize the choice of the voters.
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10