Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10
31
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: U.S. Politics
« Last post by Tom Graves on Yesterday at 12:24:47 PM »





I highlighted the only agreement I see.

I forgot to include the word "temporary" in my question to GROK.
32
ME: Is it true that the only thing Trump agreed to was a cease fire?

GROK: No, that's not accurate. President Trump agreed to a two-week ceasefire with Iran (involving the US and Israel), but it includes additional conditions and is explicitly framed as a step toward broader negotiations.

Key Details of the Agreement

Ceasefire terms: Trump announced the US would suspend bombing and attacks on Iran for two weeks. This is conditional on Iran allowing the complete, immediate, and safe reopening of the Strait of Hormuz (a critical oil shipping route that Iran had blockaded). Iran has indicated it will coordinate safe passage for vessels.

Broader context: Trump stated the US has "already met and exceeded all Military objectives" and is "very far along with a definitive Agreement concerning Longterm PEACE with Iran, and PEACE in the Middle East." Iran proposed a 10-point plan, which Trump described as a "workable basis on which to negotiate." Negotiations are set to continue (e.g., in Islamabad).

Not a standalone ceasefire: Both sides claim elements of victory. The pause buys time to finalize a longer-term deal. Israel supports the US-Iran pause for two weeks but has clarified it does not cover its separate operations (e.g., against Hezbollah in Lebanon).

This is a very recent development (announced April 7-8, 2026), following escalated conflict involving US/Israeli strikes on Iran and Iranian responses. Claims that it was "only a ceasefire" appear to oversimplify or selectively quote Trump's announcement, ignoring the Hormuz condition, the 10-point framework, and explicit references to ongoing peace talks.

The situation is fluid and described as a "fragile truce" by some officials, with potential for the ceasefire to start immediately or soon. For the absolute latest, check reliable news sources as details could evolve quickly.






I highlighted the only agreement I see.
33
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: U.S. Politics
« Last post by Tom Graves on Yesterday at 11:33:43 AM »
Trump agreed to a temporary cease fire, that’s all…

ME: Is it true that the only thing Trump agreed to was a cease fire?

GROK: No, that's not accurate. President Trump agreed to a two-week ceasefire with Iran (involving the US and Israel), but it includes additional conditions and is explicitly framed as a step toward broader negotiations.

Key Details of the Agreement

Ceasefire terms: Trump announced the US would suspend bombing and attacks on Iran for two weeks. This is conditional on Iran allowing the complete, immediate, and safe reopening of the Strait of Hormuz (a critical oil shipping route that Iran had blockaded). Iran has indicated it will coordinate safe passage for vessels.

Broader context: Trump stated the US has "already met and exceeded all Military objectives" and is "very far along with a definitive Agreement concerning Longterm PEACE with Iran, and PEACE in the Middle East." Iran proposed a 10-point plan, which Trump described as a "workable basis on which to negotiate." Negotiations are set to continue (e.g., in Islamabad).

Not a standalone ceasefire: Both sides claim elements of victory. The pause buys time to finalize a longer-term deal. Israel supports the US-Iran pause for two weeks but has clarified it does not cover its separate operations (e.g., against Hezbollah in Lebanon).

This is a very recent development (announced April 7-8, 2026), following escalated conflict involving US/Israeli strikes on Iran and Iranian responses. Claims that it was "only a ceasefire" appear to oversimplify or selectively quote Trump's announcement, ignoring the Hormuz condition, the 10-point framework, and explicit references to ongoing peace talks.

The situation is fluid and described as a "fragile truce" by some officials, with potential for the ceasefire to start immediately or soon. For the absolute latest, check reliable news sources as details could evolve quickly.

34
Donald Trump gave in to all of Iran's demands.

* Ships may use the Strait of Hormuz but must pay Iran two million dollars per ship. No freedom of the seas. And Trump agrees.

* America must withdraw our troops from our military bases in the Middle East. And Trump agrees.

* America must pay reparations for the damage our strikes caused to Iran. And Trump agrees.

We agreed to Iran's demands. Iran did not agree to America's demands.

* Iran has agreed to reopening the Strait of Hormuz. But each ship must pay two million dollars to Iran.



Trump agreed to a temporary cease fire, that’s all…
35
Video: Murray Jackson - Why J D Tippit Was Not In His District

36
Interesting tape, and check out some of those hairdos.

People sure do get ideas locked in---CT or LN---about the JFKA. 

Why Tilson regarded the man who he saw leaving the backside of Dealey Plaza as the actual JFKA perp, rather than just a suspect...well, that's just how people are.

By most accounts, Jack Ruby was in the offices of the Dallas Morning News during the JFKA, seen by witnesses who knew him.

Side note: Any Texas cop could have run the suspect's plate number by the Texas Department of Motor Vehicles, gotten a home address, etc.  Tilson was never even curious?
37
   JOHN - You got your Haygood stuff wrong.  Cancellare took a photo of Haygood standing atop the Triple Underpass. Haygood is wearing BOTH GLOVES in that photo. We next see the alleged Haygood on the Darnell film. He is near the end of the string of passenger train cars. Haygood is wearing ONLY 1 Glove in this Darnell Film footage. Somewhere between the top of the Triple Underpass and the end of the passenger train cars, the alleged Haygood removed a glove for some reason. The distance between the top of the Triple Underpass and the train cars would only be about 40 yds. Haygood used his radio AFTER he returned to his motorcycle. Haygood used the radio AFTER already having been filmed by Darnell wearing only 1 glove. Haygood did NOT Secure the rear of the TSBD. Officer Harkness secured the rear of the TSBD.
   If you look closely at the (L) hand of the alleged Haygood, he is Not carrying a glove. A glove would Not steadily maintain its' shape as this individual walks across the railroad yard. The object in the (L) hand steadily maintains a cylinder-like shape. You probably need to examine a better definition Darnell Film. Ask Barber what he thinks he is seeing. Steve is extremely helpful with respect to the Darnell Film.

Huh, you better reread ALL the testimony?
Haywood went back to his Motorcycle and as confirmed by Tague, Tague was talking to Haywood about 2-3 minutes after the assassination.

Mr. TAGUE. ..... And we walked up to the---by this time the motorcycle policeman returned back close to where his motorcycle was, and we walked up there and there was a man standing there. Seeing that he was very excited--I don't remember his name at the time I did have it on the tip of my tongue very excited saying he was watching the President and it seemed like his head just exploded. This was a couple or 3 minutes after this happened.

Then Haywood made some calls, the last being at 12:37, then Haywood said he went to the rear of the TSBD and obviously took the high road next to the railway cars when he passed Harkness.

Quote
Haygood did NOT Secure the rear of the TSBD. Officer Harkness secured the rear of the TSBD.

Irrelevant!

Mr. BELIN. What did you do then?
Mr. HAYGOOD. At that time I went to the School Building at the rear location of it, which would be
Mr. BELIN. To the back door?
Mr. HAYGOOD. North side of it, yes.
Mr. BELIN. Where that door leads out there to the dock?
Mr. HAYGOOD. Yes; on the northeast corner there.


Your insignificant evidence of a missing glove is real weak sauce because by the time Haygood is captured by Darnell is many minutes after he returned to his motorcycle.
The reason that Haywood removed his glove could have been to operate his radio or to take notes and then he rushed away to the rear of the TSBD and simply carried his glove.
The alternative of the "impostor" removing his glove or not even having one in the first place goes absolutely nowhere and so far you have not provided any sort of sensible narrative for your gloveless "imposter" whereas I just provided two very logical alternatives.

Sorry Royell but this "impostor" theory is dead in the water because the timed radio calls by both Haywood and Harkness @12:37 are precisely co-ordinated.



JohnM
38
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: U.S. Politics
« Last post by Joe Elliott on Yesterday at 05:18:44 AM »
Donald Trump has just proven the adage, "You can get more with a kind word and gun, than you can with just a kind word." Reports are that Iran has agreed to reopen the Strait of Hormuz as part of a two week cease fire agreement. If Iran fails to allow ships through the Strait, all bets are off. We will soon know if this is a ploy by the Iranian regime but if they fail to live up to the terms of the ceasefire, they can kiss their asses good-bye.

Predictably, the vile lying scum at MS NOW are portraying this as Trump backing down again. There isn't a single person on the despicable network who had an ounce of decency. Being a lying scum is a prerequisite for being employed by MS NOW. Trump has not backed down. If the Iranians honor the ceasefire, his threats will have accomplished its purpose. If they fail to do so, they will see total destruction of their country.

Donald Trump gave in to all of Iran's demands.

* Ships may use the Strait of Hormuz but must pay Iran two million dollars per ship. No freedom of the seas. And Trump agrees.

* America must withdraw our troops from our military bases in the Middle East. And Trump agrees.

* America must pay reparations for the damage our strikes caused to Iran. And Trump agrees.

We agreed to Iran's demands. Iran did not agree to America's demands.

* Iran has agreed to reopening the Strait of Hormuz. But each ship must pay two million dollars to Iran.
39


12:32 Haywood at the top of triple overpass
12:33 Haywood talks to Tague
12:34 Haywood talks to another eyewitness
12:35 Haywood talks to dispatch
12:36 - Officer Harkness makes radio transmission that he is bringing an eyewitness/Amos Euins to the TSBD
12:37 Haywood on the radio asks to secure the TSBD and then makes his way to the rear of the TSBD by way of the railway yard
12:37 - Officer Harkness helps load Amos Euins into the car of Inspector Sawyer in front of the TSBD
12:38 - Officer Harkness secures the back of the TSBD as instructed. This is where we see him above.
12:38 Haywood while walking through the railyard is filmed by Darnell and is captured on film walking past Harkness.

The reason Haywood isn't wearing his glove is because he was using his right hand to use the radio and in his haste to get to the rear of the TSBD was carrying his right glove in his left hand.

Case Closed!

JohnM

   JOHN - You got your Haygood stuff wrong.  Cancellare took a photo of Haygood standing atop the Triple Underpass. Haygood is wearing BOTH GLOVES in that photo. We next see the alleged Haygood on the Darnell film. He is near the end of the string of passenger train cars. Haygood is wearing ONLY 1 Glove in this Darnell Film footage. Somewhere between the top of the Triple Underpass and the end of the passenger train cars, the alleged Haygood removed a glove for some reason. The distance between the top of the Triple Underpass and the train cars would only be about 40 yds. Haygood used his radio AFTER he returned to his motorcycle. Haygood used the radio AFTER already having been filmed by Darnell wearing only 1 glove. Haygood did NOT Secure the rear of the TSBD. Officer Harkness secured the rear of the TSBD.
   If you look closely at the (L) hand of the alleged Haygood, he is Not carrying a glove. A glove would Not steadily maintain its' shape as this individual walks across the railroad yard. The object in the (L) hand steadily maintains a cylinder-like shape. You probably need to examine a better definition Darnell Film. Ask Barber what he thinks he is seeing. Steve is extremely helpful with respect to the Darnell Film.

 
40
     Do you see the title of this thread? It says, "PROVE Me Wrong".  I offer: (1) documented timelines, and, (2) sworn testimonies. You offer absolutely No Evidence to refute these Facts. Why? Because you can't.  Just because YOU "do not accept" it, doesn't mean squat. 
    You should be interested in just where this alleged motorcycle cop came from. But this is why this murder remains unsolved after 62+ years. People such as yourself simply do not have the JFK Assassination Foundational Knowledge to realize the other dominoes this impacts. And, it also brings back into the conversation the motorcycle(s) being testified to going up the grassy knoll. But again, YOU don't know squat about this too.   

I have no obligation to meet your demands. I am content to point out how illogical your conclusions are. While you continue to make unsupported assertions, I have hard evidence that supports my stated beliefs. Essentially, those beliefs are that Oswald fired the shots that killed JFK and wounded JBC, that there is no credible evidence that anyone else fired a shot in Dealey Plaza on that day, that less than 45 minutes after killing JFK, Oswald shot and killed DPD officer J. D. Tippit who had stopped him for questioning. There is overwhelming forensic evidence that supports all of the above.

Now if you dispute my statement that there is no credible evidence that anyone other than Oswald took part in the assassination of JFK, please list your three best pieces of evidence that someone other than Oswald was complicit in the crime.

1___________________________________
2___________________________________
3___________________________________

I have issued this challenge countless times over the past 35 years on various forums. No one has been able to meet the challenge and few have tried. Of course you can choose to decline to meet my challenge, but since you are the one claiming there was a conspiracy, the burden is on you to support your claim. If you are unable to do so, you make it easy to ignore you.
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10