31
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: JFK's Throat Wound Was an Entrance Wound: Refuting the Shored-Wound Theory
« Last post by Michael T. Griffith on Yesterday at 06:48:57 PM »What's revealing is that Michael Griffith said he believes in the HSCA acoustic evidence. That is four shots: three from the TSBD (or behind JFK) and one shot from the fence/GK (or to his right side.) That alone disproves a entrance shot to the throat. That's if, as he does, believe the acoustic analysis.
Apparently you haven't read my article on the acoustical evidence nor my posts in this forum on the subject. I've pointed out many times that the acoustical evidence does not automatically require one to believe that only four shots were fired and that three of them came from the alleged Oswald window, since the HSCA's Dealey Plaza test firing only fired shots from the sixth-floor window and from one spot behind the fence on the grassy knoll, and since, as the HSCA acoustical experts noted, a shot fired from several feet back from a window would not be recorded by the dictabelt (at least not recorded enough to detect). And, needless to say, shot fired by a gunman using a silencer would not have been recorded by the dictabelt.
Now, are you going to address the evidence that the throat wound was an entrance wound?
He also believes there was a shooter on top of the linen truck and that Babushka Lady was a CIA agent, June Cobb, and that she "possibly" shot JFK with a camera gun. That's two more shots. And he believes that Oswald conspired with Shaw and Ferrie in a triangulated assassination of JFK. That's another shooter, at least.
I'm not sure where you're getting half of this stuff. I've never said anything about a shooter on top of the linen truck, and I've never said that Oswald conspired with Shaw and Ferrie in a triangulated shooting of JFK (although I do believe there was triangulation, but not involving Oswald).
Yes, I do believe that June Cobb was a CIA agent, based on Mary Haverstick's ground-breaking research in her recent book A Woman I Know. I'm guessing you haven't read the book. And, yes, I do believe it's possible that the Babushka Lady, whether or not she was June Cobb, may have used a gun camera to fire a shot at JFK--again, based on Haverstick's research. Gun cameras were definitely a thing by 1963, and the Babushka Lady's actions seem odd and suspicious. See Haverstick's research.
Now, are you going to address the evidence that the throat wound was an entrance wound?
He has shooters all over Dealey Plaza shooting from various angles and locations. But he also believe the HSCA acoustic analysis of two shooters and two locations.
I don't have shooters "all over Dealey Plaza," and the acoustical evidence does not mean that only four shots were fired, as explained above.
Now, are you going to address the evidence that the throat wound was an entrance wound?
He believes in things that contradict other things that he believes. It's a mishmash of claims that are at odds with other claims. Day after day, week after week, month after month. For decades.
The supposed "contradictions" are in your mind and are based on your lack of knowledge of my research and of other scholarly research.
Now, are you going to address the evidence that the throat wound was an entrance wound?
It's the classic example of a disordered conspiracy obsessed mind.
Well, of course. Anyone who disagrees with your minority view of the JFK case simply must have "a disordered conspiracy obsessed mind." It just can't be that your view on the case is a decidedly minority view because your version of the assassination is implausible and untenable. No, that just can't be.
At least I'm in good company, since 2/3 to 3/4 of the Western world believes JFK was killed by a conspiracy, and since the last official federal investigation into the assassination concluded that JFK was killed by a conspiracy, that two gunmen were involved, that a shot came from the grassy knoll, that there is credible evidence that anti-Castro Cubans were trying to frame Oswald weeks before the assassination, that Jack Ruby had significant Mafia ties, that Ruby lied about how he entered the basement to shoot Oswald, that Ruby lied about why he shot Oswald, and that someone was moving boxes in the sixth-floor window within 2 minutes after the shooting when Oswald could not have been there.
Now, are you going to address the evidence that the throat wound was an entrance wound?
Recent Posts



