Why do you always clip your sources out of context? Why didn't you post the entire affidavit or a link to it? Inspected the limo is not the same as searched the limo. Because you left out a chunk of the affidavit, we are left to guess at the context.
You might or might not have confirmation the two NCOs searched the limo but since you only posted a portion of the affidavit, we are left to guess at that. What you don't have is any confirmation they found a bullet and took it with them to Bethesda. Why would the Secret Service have kept a fragmented bullet and let the NCOs take a whole bullet with them to Bethesda. Are we supposed to believe that the Secret Service searched the limo and missed a bullet that was later found by the NCOs? Do you ever think things through?
Do you ever stop posting such transparently dishonest, ridiculous dodges?
Quoting the most relevant portion of a four-page source is not quoting "out of context." I doubt that you even know what that term actually means. What "context" could change the obvious meaning of Agent Taylor's statement that "representatives from Dr. Burkley's office at the White House, William Martinell and Thomas Mills, inspected SS-100-X"? Huh? What? Tell us. Do you think Taylor wrote elsewhere in his report that he was only kidding when he said Mills and Martinell inspected the limo?!
It is just juvenile ignorance and silliness to imply that my quote from Taylor's affidavit is somehow suspect because I "left out a chunk of the affidavit." Every time anyone quotes a paragraph from a book, they are "leaving out a chunk of the book."
Oh, and "inspected" is "not the same" as "searched"?! Really?! Sheesh, just how silly and foolish can you get? I mean, really, this is the kind idiotic dodging you'd expect from a teenager who couldn't bring himself to acknowledge something he didn't want to admit.
FYI, the terms "inspected," "examined," and "searched" are used interchangeably in zillions of investigative documents when referring to things such as cars, rooms, areas, drawers, compartments, etc.
Indeed, Taylor said that Secret Service agents Paterni and Boring also "inspected" the limo, and he said this in the same paragraph and sentence as the one I quoted! The ellipses I inserted replaced this statement. Let's read:
At 10:10 p.m., Deputy Chief Paterni, ASAIC Boring, and representatives from Dr. Burkley's office at the White House, William Martinell and Thomas Mills, inspected SS-100-X.You can confirm this yourself by reading page 2 of Taylor's report, which you can find here:
https://www.scribd.com/document/16573650/TaylorAffAs you probably don't know,
Paterni and Boring were the ones who found the two bullet fragments in the front of the limo. They found the fragments when they "inspected" the limo! Paterni was the one who handed the fragments over to FBI agent Orrin Bartlett, who in turn took them to the FBI lab and gave them to the FBI's Robert Frazier (3 H 435).
Paterni and Boring never claimed to find skull fragments and a misshapen bullet in the limo, because they didn't. Mills and Martinell found them. Paterni turned over the items that he found, i.e., the two bullet fragments, to the FBI, while Mills and Martinell took the items that they found, i.e., the skull fragments and the deformed bullet, to the autopsy, as they were instructed to do.
Why would the Secret Service have kept a fragmented bullet and let the NCOs take a whole bullet with them to Bethesda.
LOL! Is this a serious question? Really? "Why," you ask? Umm, because the two Navy NCOs were the ones who found the bullet and the skull fragments, because they were under orders to bring to the autopsy what they found in the limo, and because they were acting on orders given by a Navy O-6 who was the chief aide to the White House doctor, the chief aide to the personal physician of the President of the United States! Gee, ya think?!
BTW, what happened to your nonsensical argument that the Secret Service never would have let Mills and Martinell search the limo? Huh?
Finally, why do you keep using the dishonest term "fragmented bullet" to describe the two bullet fragments found in the front of the limo, when those fragments constituted
less than half of the mass of a bullet?
CE 567 weighed 41.5 grains. CE 569 weighed 21 grains. The two fragments combined weighed only 62.5 grains. But, the average rifle bullet weighs between 150 and 180 grains, and a WCC 6.5 mm FMJ bullet weighs 160.8 grains.
In other words, the two bullet fragments found in the front of the limo constituted only 39% of the mass of the kind of bullet that Oswald allegedly used, and constituted no more than 42% and as little as 35% of the mass of an average rifle bullet.