Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10
31
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Another sign that interest in the JFK assassination is waning
« Last post by John Corbett on Yesterday at 04:13:22 PM »
Quote from: Royell Storing on February 24, 2026, 10:16:11 PM
   Interest wanes because alleged JFK Assassination "researchers" continue pounding on the same tired drums. I instead have gone where, "no man has gone before": (1) The Elm St Extension, and (2) The Railroad Yard. This virgin ground has led me to the 2 Newest JFK Assassination Discoveries in decades. (1) A Car rolling down the Elm St Ext while shots were being fired, and (2) An Unknown DPD Motorcycle Cop filmed by Darnell inside the railroad yard.  Each of these discoveries proves a JFK Assassination Conspiracy.

How does a photograph establish that a car was rolling down the Elm St. extension and what is your evidence the photo was taken during the shooting?

Even if we accept your premises of the car on the Elm St. extension and a motorcycle cop in the railroad yard, how would either of those prove a conspiracy?
32
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Another sign that interest in the JFK assassination is waning
« Last post by John Corbett on Yesterday at 04:09:31 PM »
Quote from: Tom Graves on Yesterday at 02:10:51 AM
The book should be titled "10.2 Seconds in Dallas," because that's how long it took Oswald to fire all three shots.

It is difficult to fix the time span of the shots without knowing when the first shot was fired and we have no definitive evidence in the Z-film for that. However, there are clues such as the visible reactions of JBC and Rosemary Willis. What we don't know is how quickly they reacted. To me, the best indication of when the first shot was fired was the jiggle of Zapruder's camera at frame 158. Since the distance from the muzzle of Oswald's rifle and Zapruder's ears is a constant, we should expect a similar time lag between when each shot was fired and when Zapruder reacted. This indicates a time lag of about 6-7 frames although we shouldn't expect that number to be an integer. A jiggle at 158 indicates to me a shot fired about 151-152. That works out to a total time frame for all three shots to be about 8.7 seconds. Granted, this is an educated guess given that it is based on the premise that the jiggle of Zapruder's camera at 158 was in reaction to the sound of the first shot, but to me that is the best evidence we have for when the first shot was fired.
33
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / George Lardner on Mark Lane
« Last post by Fred Litwin on Yesterday at 02:47:51 PM »
George Lardner on Mark Lane 

Lardner, a reporter for the Washington Post, wrote a very good profile of Mark Lane with particular emphasis on the HSCA.



https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/george-lardner-on-mark-lane
34
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Another sign that interest in the JFK assassination is waning
« Last post by Royell Storing on Yesterday at 02:11:37 PM »

 You need to get in touch with Max. He understands how to present a flim-flam. You on the other hand have somehow managed to take his "Gone With The Wind" and turn it into, "It's A Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World". You're not helping the man.
35
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: A Car, A Garden, And A Coupla Guys
« Last post by Charles Collins on Yesterday at 01:05:59 PM »
Quote from: James Hackerott on Yesterday at 03:12:58 AM


Charles, from the nose of the car to that shadow area is about right for a VW bug's tail end. That 17.5' car must be well west of that area. There is no evidence for a background car parked in front of the gates. I want to work this out with you. Tomorrow I will make an overhead graphic that might be of use.



Thanks James, you are very good at these things, so my mind is always open. One thing I would point out is that the Darnell film (as Baker runs in front of the car) shows the car with the front right wheel to the right of the posts. It is from a very similar angle to and taken only seconds after the Weigman film frame. This would mean that someone would have had to pull the car forward five and a half feet between the Weigman film frame and the Darnell footage and then they would have had to back the car up five and a half feet or so between the Darnell film and when Hughes captured his image and then pulled the car forward five and a half feet again before the William Allen photo was taken. I doubt that the car ever moved.
36
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / What do we see to the left of "Fedora Man on the Island" in the Wiegman clip?
« Last post by Tom Graves on Yesterday at 04:36:09 AM »
What do we see behind-and-to-the-immediate left of "Fedora Man on the Island" in the Wiegman clip?

1) Only Sonderführer Storing's 1958 Pontiac Bonneville "Abandoned Getaway Car" parked next to the "Island," or

2) A combination of the rear part of Sonderführer Storing's 1958 Pontiac Bonneville "Abandoned Getaway Car" parked next to the "Island" and another light-colored car behind it on the other side of Elm Street Extension, or

3) Just some rando car other than Sonderführer Storing's 1958 Pontiac Bonneville "Abandoned Getaway Car," or

4) [fill in the blank]?




 
37
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Another sign that interest in the JFK assassination is waning
« Last post by Tom Graves on Yesterday at 04:22:44 AM »
Quote from: Royell Storing on Yesterday at 03:57:58 AM
   "ESTIMATE" gunshot sound?  I ask for EVIDENCE, and this is ALL you got? Laughable.

yES yOU ARE, Sonderführer Storing, yeS yOu ARE.
38
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Another sign that interest in the JFK assassination is waning
« Last post by Royell Storing on Yesterday at 03:57:58 AM »
Quote from: Tom Graves on Yesterday at 03:23:58 AM
Dear Sonderführer Storing,

Read it and weep.

https://www.acsr.org/post/estimating-occult-timing-of-surprise-gunshot-sounds-in-silent-film-via-observed-start-of-human-vol

-- Tom

   "ESTIMATE" gunshot sound?  I ask for EVIDENCE, and this is ALL you got? Laughable.
39
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Another sign that interest in the JFK assassination is waning
« Last post by Tom Graves on Yesterday at 03:23:58 AM »
Quote from: Royell Storing on Yesterday at 03:00:40 AM
    There is both film and physical evidence proving the existence of "BIG FOOT". There is ZERO evidence proving a 10.2 second firing time for 3 shots from the sniper's nest. This shows how ridiculous this claimed extended firing time is.

Dear Sonderführer Storing,

Read it and weep.

https://www.acsr.org/post/estimating-occult-timing-of-surprise-gunshot-sounds-in-silent-film-via-observed-start-of-human-vol

-- Tom
40
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: A Car, A Garden, And A Coupla Guys
« Last post by James Hackerott on Yesterday at 03:12:58 AM »
Quote from: Charles Collins on Yesterday at 12:54:35 AM
Thanks very much James. That’s helpful. I think that we are interpreting what we see in the Wiegman film frame differently. I see two different cars in the gap between fedora man and purse lady. In the following image I have drawn yellow arrows, one pointing at the right taillight of the Pontiac and another one pointing at the front right wheel of the Pontiac. Please notice that my interpretation of the Weigman frame has the taillight lined up with the western edge of the opening for the large gates and the front right wheel to the camera right of the post. While your interpretation (image) has the taillight lined up with a point on that surface a few feet further west and the front right wheel to the camera left of the post.



Charles, from the nose of the car to that shadow area is about right for a VW bug's tail end. That 17.5' car must be well west of that area. There is no evidence for a background car parked in front of the gates. I want to work this out with you. Tomorrow I will make an overhead graphic that might be of use.



Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10