Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10
31
Well I looked at Norman’s WC testimony again and I have to say that imo he does NOT support a  2nd shot at Z224 because:

A. He described that at the time he heard the first shot, that he saw JFK with his right hand raised. That’s about at Z190 when JFKs right hand was FULLY raised and JFK is looking right to the max degree. I think his right arm starts to move at about Z175 but is not fully up until Z190.

B. Norman said he  then saw JFK  slump and only AFTER that slump  did Norman hear the next 2 shots which according to an earlier statement he made , were in only approx 2 seconds.

So… there are only  two 3 shot sequence proposals that Norman supports. One is Andrew’s Z190/270/313 and the other one is Dans 1st shot at Z224 theory , 2nd shot Z313 and a 3rd shot fired After Z313 in only 2 seconds which was the one which hit the curb near Tague.

Dans Z224 1st shot fits well enough with Norman  seeing JFK hand raised at Z190 and hearing a shot as it’s only about 1.5 sec after that at Z224.

The Z224 1st shot is supported by lack of any SS agents looking back from Z133 to Z207. Hickeys movement at Z 143 looking forward left ( and down) is NOT a response to a gunshot since he said he had looked BACK at TSBD when he heard the first shot.

Andrew’s is the more controversial theory. The bullets have to deflect more and fragment more and the Z190 shot is thru the tree foliage. The movements of JFK and JC from Z224-Z230 must be considered delayed reactions. Z190 however, does fit with the Willis girl reaction and Betzner not hearing a shot until after his Z186 photo taken.

Dans Z224 1st theory makes a lot of sense in explaining lack of reactions of not only the SS agents but people all along the road beside the limo such as Charles Brehm and 2 guys clapping and a woman walking calmly across the plaza green in the background.

The one questionable shot is a 3rd shot fired rapidly in just 2 secs , apparently UNaimed. It’s questionable if it’s a bolt action rifle why the shooter would have lost his target or why he would  fire a 3rd shot at all since he must have seen that he scored the hit at Z313.

What makes the least sense is the conventional WC theory that the 1st shot missed the entire limo and that it was fired at Z124, or Z140 deflecting off a light pole, or at Z150.,Z160, or Z170. None of those are in keeping with a 3/4th majority witness hearing 3 shots rapidly fired and the last 2 “back to back”.

Why do people keep relying on witnesses to figure out what happened. We have one reliable witness and that was Zapruder's camera. It trumps all the human witnesses combined. The only human witnesses who we should be relied upon are the ones who can be corroborated by hard evidence.
32
If it was a conspiracy to silence Oswald, Ruby shooting him in front of cameras was about the dumbest way to do it  since there were other stealthier ways to do it.
33
It seems to me that Ben is grossly overstating Woolsey's expertise. He was CIA Director for less than two years under Clinton some 30 years after the JFKA. The rest of his career, before and after, seems to have little or nothing to do with spy work.

Here from the CIA-affiliated (but highly respected) professional journal Studies In Intelligence is an absolutely scathing review of Woolsey's co-authored JFKA tome, Operation Dragon: Inside the Kremlin's Secret War on America: https://www.cia.gov/resources/csi/studies-in-intelligence/volume-65-no-3-september-2021-special-issue/review-operation-dragon-inside-the-kremlins-secret-war-on-america/. Woolsey's book also did not fare well on the Ed Forum, where there are several threads discussing it.

Woolsey's claim is that Oswald was a "trained assassin" (WHAT???) personally sent back to America by Khrushchev to avenge the latter's fury over being humiliated by the Cuban Missile Crisis. YA THINK??? (Actually, Khrushchev was far from humiliated. There was a behind-the-scenes agreement to remove U.S. missiles from Turkey. I actually think Khrushchev came out of the CMC seeming quite reasonable and statesmanlike.)

The review, by an unnamed officer in the CIA Directorate of Operations then assigned to the Center for the Study of Intelligence, makes the book sound like it would be right down the alley of a certain KGB-obsessed participant on this forum:

Contrary to press reports and even the book jacket’s claims, Operation Dragon is not a book especially focused on the Kennedy assassination. It is instead a near-relentless screed designed to illustrate the unsurpassed evil and treachery of Russia and the Soviet Union.

As to Ben's question, I think he probably should rely on online JFKA "hobbyists" if they've spent decades studying the JFKA, because Woolsey and his co-author (a Romanian defector) sure as hell hadn't. Are Jim DiEugenio, Larry Hancock, Pat Speer and at least 25 others I could mention even if I violently disagree with them mere "hobbyists"?
34
Well I looked at Norman’s WC testimony again and I have to say that imo he does NOT support a  2nd shot at Z224 because:

A. He described that at the time he heard the first shot, that he saw JFK with his right hand raised. That’s about at Z190 when JFKs right hand was FULLY raised and JFK is looking right to the max degree. I think his right arm starts to move at about Z175 but is not fully up until Z190.

B. Norman said he  then saw JFK  slump and only AFTER that slump  did Norman hear the next 2 shots which according to an earlier statement he made , were in only approx 2 seconds.

So… there are only  two 3 shot sequence proposals that Norman supports. One is Andrew’s Z190/270/313 and the other one is Dans 1st shot at Z224 theory , 2nd shot Z313 and a 3rd shot fired After Z313 in only 2 seconds which was the one which hit the curb near Tague.

Dans Z224 1st shot fits well enough with Norman  seeing JFK hand raised at Z190 and hearing a shot as it’s only about 1.5 sec after that at Z224.

The Z224 1st shot is supported by lack of any SS agents looking back from Z133 to Z207. Hickeys movement at Z 143 looking forward left ( and down) is NOT a response to a gunshot since he said he had looked BACK at TSBD when he heard the first shot.

Andrew’s is the more controversial theory. The bullets have to deflect more and fragment more and the Z190 shot is thru the tree foliage. The movements of JFK and JC from Z224-Z230 must be considered delayed reactions. Z190 however, does fit with the Willis girl reaction and Betzner not hearing a shot until after his Z186 photo taken.

Dans Z224 1st theory makes a lot of sense in explaining lack of reactions of not only the SS agents but people all along the road beside the limo such as Charles Brehm and 2 guys clapping and a woman walking calmly across the plaza green in the background.

The one questionable shot is a 3rd shot fired rapidly in just 2 secs , apparently UNaimed. It’s questionable if it’s a bolt action rifle why the shooter would have lost his target or why he would  fire a 3rd shot at all since he must have seen that he scored the hit at Z313.

What makes the least sense is the conventional WC theory that the 1st shot missed the entire limo and that it was fired at Z124, or Z140 deflecting off a light pole, or at Z150.,Z160, or Z170. None of those are in keeping with a 3/4th majority witness hearing 3 shots rapidly fired and the last 2 “back to back”.
35
Just quick points:

1. I don't believe Oswald cared about escaping. I think he was completely astounded to find himself on the sidewalk outside the TSBD. I think he viewed this act as the end of his life, the big opportunity Fate had finally handed him. He would either be martyred for the Cuban cause or be taken into custody and have the opportunity to spout his political philosophy at a trial. If this had been a KGB or G2 operation, they darn well would have cared about the participants escaping if they had been so doltish as to use participants whose backgrounds screamed KGB or G2.

2. TSBD6 was a good location to shoot JFK; the roof of the Dal-Tex or County Records building would have been better by all I have read. In comparison to those, the TSBD6 was fantastically risky. Getting the weapon inside and assembling it when an entire floor-laying crew would be working all morning was risky enough. Betting the floor would be empty and no one would choose to watch the motorcade from that vantage point was fantastically risky. Betting Oswald could cleanly exit the floor and building and make his way to Wherever was likewide fantastically risky. Oswald did this for the reasons set forth in #1 above. No KGB or G2 organizer in his right mind would have chosen TSBD6. Oswald could have simply gone to lunch and found a preplanted rifle at a much, much safer location. If Oswald had cared about escapting, even he wouldn't have chosen TSBD6.

3. It's not a matter of thinking the "perps think as I do." It's a matter of thinking the perps at least think rationally. A JFKA by LN Oswald shooting from inside the TSBD makes sense for the reasons set forth in #1 above and because Oswald was Oswald and the JFKA was a last-minute, flying-by-the-seat-of-his-pants decision. Having the principal gunman fire from inside a building, with absolutely no control over what the circumstances would be at the time, just makes no sense unless the conspirators were the Three Stooges. What I think is going on here is pretty much what is always going on: You're stuck with Dealey Plaza and a JFKA in which Oswald was indeed firing from TSBD6 and this all has to be rationalized even though it's irrational in the context of any conspiracy. The conspirators needed a "diversion" from the TSBD6 on the GK when THERE WAS NO REASON TO HAVE A GUNMAN IN TSBD6 IN THE FIRST PLACE.

36
If you really think you've found some game changing evidence of a conspiracy, why are you wasting your time posting it here for a few dozen people to read. Why don't you take what you've discovered to the networks, the cable news channels, and the major newspapers. Surely at least one of them will be interested in such a revelation. You could go down in history as the guy who solved the JFKA.

   I am Not about fame and/or fortune. If I can help remove the scales from the eyes of people such as yourself, my "reward" will be forthcoming.
   The fame/fortune goals are exactly why this case remains unsolved after 62+ yrs. Way too many so called JFK Assassination Researchers were/are focused on achieving those goals vs solving the case. This is why NONE of them ever discovered the car parked alongside the Island was NOT on the Wiegman Film, or that Officer Haygood did make a time stamping 12:35 radio transmission vs the Officer Harkness 12:36 radio transmission. These discoveries are extremely time consuming. And with the JFK Assassination "researchers", time is money.   
37
Are you being deliberately obtuse??

The GIF I just showed you, showed multiple flowers moving independently!



Here's ALL the frames plus a few more in your much ballyhooed 29:30 timeframe and as can be seen, you're imagining a twisted face from shadows and open spaces. Somewhere in the middle an obvious space between two flowers at the top becomes your right eyebrow and the left eyebrow appears and disappears because it's the shadow between two moving flowers. DOH!



JohnM

                                                               JOHN - Thanks for posting 29:30

              So you're claiming that what we are actually seeing in 29:30 is merely "shadows"? This is what we do actually see: (1) A LARGE SOLID BLACK DOT at the end of Lamb Chop's snout, (2) A THIN BLACK CIRCLE around Lamb Chop's Entire snout preceding the LARGE SOLID BLACK DOT, (3) BLACK EYES, and, (4) The FLOPPY EAR. "Shadows"? What we see are irrefutable Details! These are irrefutable Facts!
 
              You need to remember that there were numerous variations of Lamb Chop. There was everything from a small Lamb Chop "hand puppet", to a full body Lamb Chop "Doll". And the face of Lamb Chop also changed with these numerous Lamb Chop variations. These facial variations included the distinctive Lamb Chop "Snout" with its' THIN BLACK CIRCLE and Large BLACK DOT that we do see in 29:30.  Jean Hill said she saw a small dog in the backseat of the JFK Limo. What she actually saw was "Lamb Chop".  The Lamb Chop facial details that we see in 29:30 conclusively Proves this.
38
LP--

Verily I read the Caro books too...I am even a grad of the LBJ School of Public Affairs in Austin. Some of the Johnson Administration people made presentations while I was there, including Dean Rusk.

I doubt LBJ was involved the JFKA. I am less sure of what happened to a guy named Marshall.

The 1961 death of U.S. Department of Agriculture official Henry Marshall was initially ruled a suicide but later, in 1985, changed to homicide, following investigations linking it to Texas swindler Billie Sol Estes and claims that then-Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson (LBJ) ordered the killing to cover up fraud.

It sure looks like Marshall was murdered, and in the Texas of 1961, somehow that obvious fact was smoothed over.

Who knows?

I mean, aside from Robert Morrow.
39
Not sure I follow your reasoning on several points.

The TSBD was a perfect location, right by the hairpin turn onto Elm.

TSBD6 was not a floor with offices, but only boxes of books. Nobody went there except to place or retrieve books. By luck, the JFK motorcade passed the TSBD during the lunch hour. Again, that was luck, but made for an excellent sniper's secluded nest. The TSBD6 was deserted. Perhaps, if someone had been there, LHO would have gone up to TSBD7.

I don't know every building in Dallas, but the TSBD was about good as one could hope. 

LHO was able to secret a rifle into the TSBD without notice. That alone made the TSBD a good choice. LHO, a lithe 24, and who had mustered through Marine boot camp, knew of the back stairs out of the TSBD, that would provide a quick exit. He proved the worth of that exit route.

My suspected second gunsel indeed may have fired from another location behind the limo, such as Dal-Tex building. I don't know.

Of course, the JFKA was risky operation. The use of a diversion on the GK likely increased odds of escape.

Still, again, you are assuming the perps think as you do.

For example, the perps of the 1954 Capitol shooting cared more about the act, than escaping.

The shooting of the U.S. Capitol occurred on March 1, 1954, when four Puerto Rican nationalists—Lolita Lebrón, Rafael Cancel Miranda, Andres Figueroa Cordero, and Irvin Flores Rodríguez—fired approximately 30 shots from the House visitors' gallery to protest U.S. rule, wounding five congressmen. All assailants were captured, convicted, and imprisoned, later having their sentences commuted by President Jimmy Carter in 1978 and 1979.

In 1950, two Puerto Rican nationalists, Oscar Collazo and Griselio Torresola, attempted to force their way into the Blair House in Washington, D.C., where Truman was staying during renovations of the White House.

In both above cases, there was a conspiracy of assassins, who wanted to perp the act more than they wanted to escape. There was Latin American leftist politics being played out. There were zealots and extremists all over Cuba and Latin America during the 1950s-60s. Assassinations were common.

(AI: Political assassinations in Latin America during the 1950s and 1960s were frequent, reflecting intense Cold War tensions, the prevalence of military dictatorships, and rising revolutionary movements. These killings often aimed to eliminate political opposition, silence critics of entrenched regimes, or, in the case of CIA-backed initiatives, prevent the spread of communism.)

A couple hot-head G2'ers, seeking revenge for JFK's many assassination attempts on Castro, may have also wanted to perp the act more than they wanted to escape.

The G2'ers may have been surprised they were able to simply drive away from Dallas, and then to read in the papers that LHO was a LN.

You say there were flaws in the JFKA CT. Of course, there were---it was a simple, low-level op. But it worked, so it wasn't that flawed.

---30---

I have not done much plinking, and that long ago. I did fire a 30.06 and I saw why everyone seemed to like them. I don't know why you are so down on Winchesters. Maybe you had a lesser sample.

AI: Model 70 (Bolt-Action): Often called "The Rifleman's Rifle," the Model 70 is praised for its accuracy, classic Mauser-style controlled-feed action, and three-position safety. It is considered a top-tier hunting rifle.Model 94 (Lever-Action): Iconic for deer hunting, the Model 94 is known for being lightweight, compact, and reliable in rugged conditions.
The Winchester is also highly regarded.

40
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Rethinking LBJ
« Last post by Lance Payette on Yesterday at 03:00:39 PM »
LBJ is, of course, at the very pinnacle of likely conspiracy participants.

Cui bono? (“Who benefitted?”) is the standard criminal inquiry when looking for suspects.

Well, going from a vastly underused and ridiculed VP who was likely to be dropped from the 1964 ticket, was facing Congressional investigation and likely to be removed from office to POTUS in the blink of an eye has to be as “cui bono” as it gets.

HOWEVER, I recently finished all four of acclaimed historian Robert Caro’s massive and highly acclaimed books on LBJ, which are regarded as among the very best works of their kind. They are collectively thousands of pages – and the last one only takes us up to a few months after the JFKA as we await Caro’s final volume that he hopes to publish in his lifetime (he’s 90).

It was refreshing to read real history by a real historian instead of JFKA blather. Caro is aware of all the conspiratorial theorizing that swirls around LBJ but says he found nothing in his exhaustive research to suggest LBJ was actually involved. (For a counterpoint, and a glimpse of true conspiratorial insanity, search “Robert Morrow” at the Ed Forum and you’ll see what non-history by a foaming-at-the-mouth LBJ crank looks like.) Caro is no LBJ worshipper, so that charge can't be laid at his feet.

I lived through LBJ's Presidency but was astounded at who he really was. Yes, he was a roughhewn character who could be rude, crude, sneaky and manipulative, but he was a political genius of the first magnitude and had a preternatural talent for motivating those around him to work as unbelievably hard as he did. “Uncle Cornpone,” as he was derisively referred to by the Kennedy crowd, was actually far more politically sophisticated and savvy than all of them put together. Immediately after the JFKA, he pledged to push through JFK’s civil rights legislation that was then hopelessly bogged down. Civil rights leaders who met with him came away awed (and even crying), saying JFK and RFK were “children” in comparison to LBJ. Again and again, dating back to his days at a Podunk college in the Texas hill country, what he achieved and how he did it is difficult to believe. Simply a genius in more ways than one.

He had said repeatedly since early childhood, in circumstances where it seemed ridiculous at the time, that he would one day be President. He wasn’t kidding. He thought it was his destiny, and it was his obsession.

Just one example: He was also obsessed with becoming wealthy. Early in his Congressional career - he was in his 20s - a Texas multi-millionaire who enjoyed being a benefactor offered him a sweetheat deal on an oil operation that would have made him wealthy overnight. LBJ thought about it but decided he couldn't risk being associated with the oil industry. The benefactor was flabbergasted. No one in Texas would have cared about an association with the oil industry, even if LBJ decided to run for Governor or the Senate. He then realized that this impoverished twentysomething newbie Congressman wasn't thinking in those terms. He was thinking about the Presidency.

Everyone – and I mean everyone – urged him not to accept the Vice Presidency. He was “Master of the Senate” (the title of Caro’s third book), already fantastically more powerful than any VP could ever be. It made no sense to anyone but LBJ. He made no bones about why he was accepting the position. He expected to die early – all the Johnson men did – and this was likely his last shot at the Presidency.

He told people why he was accepting the position. On the night of JFK's inauguration, he told Clare Booth Luce. He had previously told other trusted friends and journalists. I may not have the quote exactly right, but it was very close to this: “I’m a gamblin’ man, darlin’, and this is the only chance I got. One in six Presidents dies in office. I’ve done the research.” And he actually had done the research.

As it turned out, of course, his gamble paid off. His Presidency turned into a Shakespearean tragedy as Vietnam escalated from something like 15,000 American advisers to more than 500,000 troops - but he had achieved the Presidency as he had always dreamed.

Suspicious? Sure. But on the other hand, who would have spoken this brazenly before JFK's inauguration and then actually have masterminded or even participated in the JFKA? Anyone involved, up to and including LBJ, would have been risking certain execution. LBJ was very aware of his place in history – he has a far larger place than I had realized – and there is no way in my opinion (or Caro’s, I surmise) that he would’ve risked throwing it (and the vast wealth he had achieved) all away. Just an aside, but there was far more to Ladybird than I had ever realized - and I don't believe LBJ would have done that to her, either.

He was a dutiful VP, remaining loyal through all the Uncle Cornpone stuff and the demeaning sideline role to which he was relegated. He utterly despised RFK (the feeling was mutual) but not so much JFK.

I have no doubt he regarded the JFKA as an unbelievable stroke of luck and wasn’t shedding any tears. However, the more I learn the less likely I think it is that he had any role in the JFKA or any preknowledge of it. Robet Morrow, as you will see if you care to do so, vehemently disagrees.

Here's wacky Robert, for whom a tinfoil hat simply isn't sufficient:



See https://www.wsj.com/articles/front-runner-for-texas-school-board-wants-to-teach-pole-dancing-conspiracy-theories-11583526093 ("AUSTIN, Texas—He wears a jester hat, frequently tweets photos of women’s breasts and advocates for teaching in schools that Lyndon Johnson assassinated John F. Kennedy.").
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10