Recent Posts
Come on Andrew, let's not go through all this yet again.The location of the hole in the clothing such as a jacket that is free to move around can be misleading. You also have the jacket on a hanger. Here it is on the body:
Just be honest.
Look at the image of JBC's jacket above and how low down the bullet hole is.
Remember the bullet exits on a downward trajectory, so his wrist would have to be even lower than the bullet hole.
Now look at how high up JBC is holding his wrist in z271.The bullet struck just above the end of the jacket cuff and struck the middle of the french cuff:
All you need to do is be honest.
How the hell does a bullet fired from behind the limo exit from the right nipple during that sequence? It's preposterousI didn’t make up the notion the JBC was turned sideways when the second shot sounded. Nellie and Gayle Newman observed it and JBC’s three doctors agreed that his chest was nearly parallel to the direction of the bullet:
I've looked at a number of online dictionary definitions of "missile", some of which would apply to a bullet fragment and others which would not. It really isn't important. It is what the person who used the term "missile" meant by it. If that person considered a fragment to be a missile, then it is a missile.
Well then, it should be easy to find clarification in the official documents for such a major discrepancy.
Missile is a bullet, I'm not aware of any reference of other fragments found in this case called "missiles".
Even if "removed" Humes made no further reference to it, The document was hidden until 1972.
Find an official reference that missile means fragment would clarify it as not just another lame excuse
You are offering yourself and your shallow nay-saying as not only on parr with Armstrong but better...
I think any review or your material vs Armstrong's sleuthing shows that for what it is...
Just Armstrong's Westbrook material is near genius work and cracks the case...
Do you believe Westbrook when he says he walked from the Police Station to the Depository?
The "major discrepancy" exists only in your own head and nowhere else. "Missile" has a range of meanings, and the fragments exchanged for the receipt falls within that. For that matter, Sibert and O'Neil both talk about the fragments and the receipt exchanged therefore in their ARRB depositions.
Armstrong is one of the best in the business...He deserves better and his evidence stands up...
