Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10
31
To my knowledge no expert has even considered a scenario in which the bullet through JFK then struck just the thigh.

That alone should tell you something
Quote
 

The trajectory was along the femur so it struck at a shallow angle to the femur bone. The femur is the strongest bone in the body so I don’t know on what basis one could say that a partially spent bullet, tumbling end over end then striking the thigh butt first on a shallow angle striking the femur and making a dent in the base on one side would result in a shattering of the femur.
The better question might be: how does a bullet strike the back of the radius with enough force to break pieces of the radius (but not put a hole through the radius) and not deflect away from the point of contact?
CE399 showed how that happened.
Quote

The evidence is that Greer sensed an impact in the car on the second shot and Tague was struck on the second shot. 
 My only contention is that the large bodies of mutually consistent witness evidence all fits together and cannot be rejected. I wouldn’t call that a theory. It is what the witnesses independently recalled happened: JFK was struck by the first shot; the first shot was after z186: the last two shots were closer together and in fairly rapid succession. There is no conflict between that evidence and one person firing all shots with Oswald’s rifle.  There is no conflict between that evidence and the zfilm.  There is no conflict between that evidence and the physical evidence

Your fixation on eyewitnesses while ignoring the hard evidence continues to prevent you from knowing the truth of the assassination. There is nothing about your theory that is the least bit compatible with the Z-film. Robin Unger's enhanced Z193 frame shows just how ridiculous your drawing is of how JBC would have to be turned for your scenario to hold water. I would estimate there is at lease a 60 degree difference in the turn of JBC's shoulder between the Z-frame and your drawing. It is preposterous.
32
Hickey did not fire the headshot. Caraco bullets will deform when striking something hard, like the dense bone of a human skull. We know that because there was a shattered bullet found on the floor of the limo and two of those fragments had sufficient markings to positively match them to Oswald's Carcano. Why would you need to see the deformed test bullets when we have the evidence of the deformed Carcano bullet taken from the actual shooting.
The 2 half jackets found in the jfk limo were from Oswald's first shot which ricocheted offa the signal arm at pseudo Z105-110.
When i watched the Nova footage i woz hoping to see Haag's tests for ricochet offa a 2 inch pipe, which i had uzed a few years ago to develop my theory. But i woz disappointed to find that Nova did not include Haag's ricochet tests.
Haag's witness board showed three kinds of ricochet. (1) the remnant lead slug (which made a hole in the floor of the limo). (2) the copper jacket, in 2 pieces, koz Carcano slug jackets were made in 2 pieces, hence they fragmented into 2 pieces (found in limo). (3) A lead spray splatter (which was seen in xrays of jfk skull.
My analysis showed that Oswald's shot-1 ricochet must hav included one of the steel side struts. And my analysis showed that Oswald was not aiming for Connally.
I think that i hav lost Haag's ricochet test info.
I feel sure that no-one will ever show me/u/us a badly deformed Carcano slug that has been deformed by a skull, or a badly fragmented Carcano slug that has been fragmented by a skull.
I seem to recall that there are lots of youtubes showing similar slugs passing throo windshield glass & suffering near zero damage.
And footage of slugs passing throo windshields & then test jelly & suffering no bad damage.
33
Pure nonsense. CE399 is that bullet that caused the thigh wound but only after passing through JFK's torso AND JBC's torso AND shattering his rib AND shattering his wrist. Had it gone directly from JFK's throat to JBC's thigh it would have done one of two things. If it hit his femur, it would have shattered it.
To my knowledge no expert has even considered a scenario in which the bullet through JFK then struck just the thigh.  The trajectory was along the femur so it struck at a shallow angle to the femur bone. The femur is the strongest bone in the body so I don’t know on what basis one could say that a partially spent bullet, tumbling end over end then striking the thigh butt first on a shallow angle striking the femur and making a dent in the base on one side would result in a shattering of the femur.

Quote
Gregory should have stayed in his lane. He was neither a ballistics expert nor a forensic medical examiner.
I guess no one could look at this and say that the bullet that made it was irregularly shaped:

Quote
The second shot hit a lot of somethings in the car like JFK's back, his throat, his necktie, JBC's back, his rib, his wrist, and his thigh. The damage to the windshield was caused by a fragment from the head shot. How does a bullet go from JBCs wrist through the car seat in front of him, through Kellerman in order to hit the windshield.
The better question might be: how does a bullet strike the back of the radius with enough force to break pieces of the radius (but not put a hole through the radius) and not deflect away from the point of contact?

The evidence is that Greer sensed an impact in the car on the second shot and Tague was struck on the second shot. 

Quote
The questions Zeon and I have presented you with are questions you should have been asking yourself about your silly theory which I think I first saw about 18 years ago on McAdams' forum. If you had, you would have realized it doesn't hold water and you would have abandoned it. Instead you try to bend and twist the evidence to make it work. By trying to drive this square peg into a round hole, you show you are not interested in knowing the truth. You are a person who wants your theory to be true.
My only contention is that the large bodies of mutually consistent witness evidence all fits together and cannot be rejected. I wouldn’t call that a theory. It is what the witnesses independently recalled happened: JFK was struck by the first shot; the first shot was after z186: the last two shots were closer together and in fairly rapid succession. There is no conflict between that evidence and one person firing all shots with Oswald’s rifle.  There is no conflict between that evidence and the zfilm.  There is no conflict between that evidence and the physical evidence
34
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: U.S. Politics
« Last post by John Corbett on Yesterday at 01:59:43 PM »
Is The Traitorous Orange Bird (rhymes with Xxxx") giving you and Storing tips on when to go short and when to go long?

Neither Trump nor I gives a crap about the short term effects on the stock market of our actions against Iran. Neither should anyone who is in the market for the long term. Day traders worry about short term moves but they are essentially gamblers, not investors. To them the market is a casino. Risk goes with the territory for those people and I'm not the least bit concerned about them. After rallying on Friday's news of the the Strait being opened, the market shrugged off the closing of it the following day. I think investors realize this is coming to a resolution whether through negotiations or forced capitulation by Iran. Heads we win, tails Iran loses. This is going to end one way or another and it won't be on Iran's terms. 

Trump is doing what he knows is right for the long-term security of the US. He could have easily ignored the rising risk of Iran obtaining nuclear weapons to put on ICBMs that would threaten the US and just about every other country in the world. That's what his predecessors did while Iran was allowed to get closer and closer to having weapons grade enriched uranium. He risked political capital for the midterms in order to keep the US safe. History will judge Trump far more kindly than present day pundits.
s
35
Get real TG, no one has ever proved Royell wrong about anything whatsoever. (At least not if you ask Royell himself….)   ;)
36
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: U.S. Politics
« Last post by Tom Graves on Yesterday at 01:17:17 PM »
It appears likely that hostilities will resume when the ceasefire expires on Wednesday. There might be one more  round of negotiations but one would have to be an incurable optimist to think anything will come of it. Friday, the Iranians announced the Strait of Hormuz would reopen only to be rescinded the next day. Whether it was just a ploy to get the US to lift the blockade of Iranian ports or the IRG overruling the deal made by negotiators, it's clear those negotiators do not speak for the regime.

As soon as the ceasefire expires, we should unload on them. Destroy their bridges. Destroy their powerplants. Whatever it takes to bring them to their knees. Best case scenario is we have intelligence that tells us where their military leaders are and decapitate their leadership. Keep killing their military leaders until we get down to a level where we get someone calling the shots who thinks martyrdom is overrated. Let's give the current leaders their 72 virgins ASAP.

One thing that has always puzzled me about the promise of 72 virgins is that they have to last an eternity and they are only going to be virgins once.

Is The Traitorous Orange Bird (rhymes with Xxxx") giving you and Storing tips on when to go short and when to go long?
37
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: U.S. Politics
« Last post by John Corbett on Yesterday at 12:47:10 PM »
It appears likely that hostilities will resume when the ceasefire expires on Wednesday. There might be one more  round of negotiations but one would have to be an incurable optimist to think anything will come of it. Friday, the Iranians announced the Strait of Hormuz would reopen only to be rescinded the next day. Whether it was just a ploy to get the US to lift the blockade of Iranian ports or the IRG overruling the deal made by negotiators, it's clear those negotiators do not speak for the regime.

As soon as the ceasefire expires, we should unload on them. Destroy their bridges. Destroy their powerplants. Whatever it takes to bring them to their knees. Best case scenario is we have intelligence that tells us where their military leaders are and decapitate their leadership. Keep killing their military leaders until we get down to a level where we get someone calling the shots who thinks martyrdom is overrated. Let's give the current leaders their 72 virgins ASAP.

One thing that has always puzzled me about the promise of 72 virgins is that they have to last an eternity and they are only going to be virgins once.
38
At 23:47 we see SSA Hickey sitting in the rear of a limo to help with the SBT alignment tests. Hickey fired the shot at Z312.
Sturdivan reckoned that the head entry woz actually very low, ie where originally claimed, not high up.
Ok, the big lie that i see. At 49:57 they say that Carcano bullets deformed in skulls in tests. Bullshit.
They of course did not show us the deformed or fragmented test bullets.

Hickey did not fire the headshot. Caraco bullets will deform when striking something hard, like the dense bone of a human skull. We know that because there was a shattered bullet found on the floor of the limo and two of those fragments had sufficient markings to positively match them to Oswald's Carcano. Why would you need to see the deformed test bullets when we have the evidence of the deformed Carcano bullet taken from the actual shooting.
40
As you and Newman lay out, Solie routed the Popov compromise into a phony hunt focused on the Soviet Russia Division. Oswald—the low-level former Marine radar operator from the Atsugi U-2 base who had publicly offered to tell the Soviets “what he knew” about radar operations—was sent to Moscow in October 1959 as the visible, deniable “source” of any U-2-related intelligence. The KGB could debrief him, extract whatever minor corroborative details he actually possessed (call signs, authentication codes, MPS-16 height-finder familiarity, general squadron logistics), and then quietly attribute the real breakthrough to him. This protected Solie’s deeper, earlier penetration. Grok on TG

---30---

Interesting.

In your view, how did Solie interact with LHO...in person or through a cut out?

What inducements were offered to get LHO to agree to this plan?

Did LHO agree to the Solie defector plan as a patriot thinking he (LHO) was on a mission for the CIA, or as a KGB asset working with Solie?

Was LHO converted to communism in Russia, or was he always a true-blue Marxist?

---30---

Also, if LHO became the Solie's U2 "patsy"---that is, Solie manipulated the CIA, officialdom and the media into believing it was LHO who leaked vital U2 secrets to Russia---why was LHO allowed back into the US without prosecution?

Why no prosecution of LHO for giving vital secrets to Moscow?

As far as WHY, WHY, WHY Oswald allowed himself to become Solie's "patsy," I assume he didn't know he was a KGB mole, and let himself be recruited so could play a Philbrick on the evil, evil, evil CIA.


Caveat emptor. Buyer beware.
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10