Do you ever stop posting such transparently dishonest, ridiculous dodges?

Quoting the most relevant portion of a four-page source is not quoting "out of context." I doubt that you even know what that term actually means. What "context" could change the obvious meaning of Agent Taylor's statement that "representatives from Dr. Burkley's office at the White House, William Martinell and Thomas Mills, inspected SS-100-X"? Huh? What? Tell us. Do you think Taylor wrote elsewhere in his report that he was only kidding when he said Mills and Martinell inspected the limo?!

It is just juvenile ignorance and silliness to imply that my quote from Taylor's statement is somehow suspect because I "left out a chunk of the affidavit." Every time anyone quotes a paragraph from a book, they are "leaving out a chunk of the book."

Oh, and "inspected" is "not the same" as "searched"?! Really?! Sheesh, just how silly and foolish can you get? I mean, really, this is the kind idiotic dodging you'd expect from a teenager who couldn't bring himself to acknowledge something he didn't want to admit.

FYI, the terms "inspected," "examined," and "searched" are used interchangeably in zillions of investigative documents when referring to things such cars, rooms, areas, drawers, compartments, etc. Indeed, Taylor said that Secret Service agents Paterni and Boring also "inspected" the limo, and he said this in the same paragraph and sentence as the one I quoted! The ellipses I inserted replaced this statement. Let's read:

At 10:10 p.m., Deputy Chief Paterni, ASAIC Boring, and representatives from Dr. Burkley's office at the White House, William Martinell and Thomas Mills, inspected SS-100-X.

You can confirm this yourself by reading page 2 of Taylor's report, which you can find here:

https://www.scribd.com/document/16573650/TaylorAff

As you probably don't know, Paterni and Boring were the ones who found the two bullet fragments in the front of the limo. They found the fragments when they "inspected" the limo! Paterni was the one who handed the fragments over to FBI agent Orrin Bartlett, who in turn took them to the FBI lab and gave them to the FBI's Robert Frazier (3 H 435).

Paterni and Boring never claimed to find skull fragments and a misshapen bullet in the limo, because they didn't. Mills and Martinell found them. Paterni turned over the items that he found, i.e., the two bullet fragments, to the FBI, while Mills and Martinell took the items that they found, i.e., the skull fragments and the deformed bullet, to the autopsy, as they were instructed to do.

LOL! Is this a serious question? Really? "Why," you ask? Umm, because the two Navy NCOs were the ones who found the bullet and the skull fragments, because they were under orders to bring to the autopsy what they found in the limo, and because they were acting on orders given by a Navy O-6 who was the chief aide to the White House doctor, the chief aide to the personal physician of the President of the United States! Gee, ya think?!

BTW, what happened to your nonsensical argument that the Secret Service never would have let Mills and Martinell search the limo? Huh?

Search and inspect are not synonyms. The latter could be done with just a casual look at the limo. The former implies a more thorough look through limo. It should be noted that Taylor's affidavit was made in 1976. He said it is based on personal observations AND discussions with the other agents. We don't know how much he personally observed and how much had been told to him. His affidavit says this happened on November 22, 1973 which is obviously a typo but let's not quibble.

CE 567 weighed 41.5 grains. CE 569 weighed 21 grains. The two fragments combined weighed only 62.5 grains. But, the average rifle bullet weighs between 150 and 180 grains, and a WCC 6.5 mm FMJ bullet weighs 160.8 grains.

In other words, the two bullet fragments found in the front of the limo constituted only 39% of the mass of the kind of bullet that Oswald allegedly used, and constituted no more than 42% and as little as 35% of the mass of an average rifle bullet.

Boring did not find one the two bullet fragments in the front of the limo. Paterni found one. Thomas Mills found the other.

https://www.maryferrell.org/xdoc/11653#relPageId=5

I have no idea. I'm not even sure that a bullet exited Kennedy's throat.
Parkland's doctors thought the throat wound was an entry wound.

What happened to the bullet that exited Kennedy's throat? Where did it go after exiting the throat?

The SBT is based on the evidence. I could present it to you but I know that you would never accept it as proof that the SBT should really be known as the Single Bullet Fact.

A lot of things can be called evidence, without it actually proving anything.

We're told by them that the wound in Kennedy's back, or back of the neck, does not line up with the wound in the throat from a shot fired from the Southeast window of the 6th floor of the TSBD

That may be, but aren't you basically saying that it does line up, without providing conclusive evidence for it?

We're told that the bullet could not have created all of the wounds that the SBT proposes it did and end up in the condition it did.

Do you have any evidence that the bullet could have created all the wounds? And what poof do you have to show that CE399 is that actual bullet?

My take is that you guys are wrong on all accounts.

You are entitled to your opinion

A strong case against the SBT does not exist.

There doesn't have to be one. It's the SBT that needs to be proven and as far as I can tell that hasn't been done - beyond presenting it as a theory and calling it a "fact" - since 1963