Sure Mark...As if you didn't have to answer how Ruby waltzed right in to the middle of the Press Conference posing as an assistant to Israeli newspapers...The Dallas cops knew who he was...The Dallas cops knew Oswald was CIA...

Ruby was instrumental to what was probably a failed plan to kill Oswald at the Texas Theater...They had already killed Tippit...A couple of sweating phone calls and offers Ruby couldn't refuse and he was right at the Police Station making sure Oswald maintained character...

Then comes a set-up in the Police Station basement Sunday morning...

Somebody should tell Schnapf that Ruby's association with the conspiracy would be a better source for his knowledge of Fair Play than any announcements by DRE...

You are certifiable.

Completely missed this one……… wow.  Robert Turnbull Crowley? Really, Tom? dang, how one name can stick out, but this is a true zombie thread that has reared its head. It is hard to defend Oswald, if you know the facts.

My favorite story about zombie threads has to do with one that was on Google Groups. I had stumbled across this particular group and I can't even remember what the subject was but something caught my eye that I felt compelled to respond to. I know members of this forum will find that hard to believe. Anyway, I composed an in depth point-by-point reply, brimming with indisputable logic. I spent 20-30 minutes on my masterful bit of prose. I was quite proud of it. After hitting the POST button, I started looking through other threads on the group and discovered they were all at least seven years old. I had made the first post to that group in seven years. It was a cyberspace ghost town. Google Groups no longer exists so that masterful piece of writing by me is lost to the ages. 

You sound like a teenager trying to lie and insult his way through an argument that he knows he's losing, and losing badly.

Here's a bit of basic logic for you: The fact that a bullet fired from the sixth-floor window could not have hit and transited JFK's neck at an upward angle unless JFK had been leaning far forward, coupled with the fact that we know he was not leaning far forward, proves that the shot could not have come from the sixth-floor window. Thus, the SBT is impossible from the outset, which means that your demand for a non-SBT trajectory through Connally is nothing but a silly evasion.

This is not to mention the fact, again, that WC skeptics have discussed non-SBT trajectories to and through Connally's torso, that Connally himself adamantly rejected any notion that he was hit before Z229, and that Dr. Shaw refuted your ridiculous 45-degree downward angle through Connally.

Objective people will notice that you are ducking and dodging the key facts discussed in my OP and in my replies.

No, the 45 degree angle bullet track through JBC is a fact. Dr Shaw never refuted it. He never mentioned it. Dr Shaw was part of the WC testimonies not the HSCA Panel. How could he refute any of their findings?

The description of the wounds and the medical analysis by the doctors are facts. Everything else is your pretend make-believe nonsense. Your made-up hypothetical crap does not mean anything to anybody. Is this Single Bullet Theory the lynchpin of your whole ridiculous conspiracy theory? Is that why you pretend
these opinions of yours have some kind of merit, and they are just unfounded opinions.

Completely missed this one……… wow.  Robert Turnbull Crowley? Really, Tom? dang, how one name can stick out, but this is a true zombie thread that has reared its head. It is hard to defend Oswald, if you know the facts.

Gerry Spence, one of the best trial lawyers of his time, who never lost a criminal case as either a prosecutor or defense counsel. was unable to get Oswald acquitted in a mock trial. Of course, he was up against another of the best trial lawyers of his time in Vincent Bugiosi, who only lost one trial during his career as a prosecutor. Count on the CTs telling us how incompetent Spence's defense of Oswald was. It couldn't have been that he was dealt a losing hand.

Completely missed this one……… wow.  Robert Turnbull Crowley?(from previous page near bottom) Really, Tom? dang, how one name can stick out, but this is a true zombie thread that has reared its head. It is hard to defend Oswald, if you know the facts.