Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10
31
I don't believe anything Oswald said and nothing he said is the basis of my firm conviction that he was a double murderer.
32
Oswald placed the package on the backseat of Fraziers car. That’s not “hiding” the package

If he had put the package in the trunk , maybe, but placing it on the back seat in plain view is not hiding.

Now I could easily believe   that a self avowed Marxist whom was a traitor to his country after taking vows as a USMC soldier and defected to the USSR could be a liar.

However whatever was stated by Oswald in private interviews which were not camera recorded or voice recorded and without attorney present, is subject to reasonable doubt.

I agree with JohnMs main premise  that Oswald’s actions are “strange” but I’m not sure that constitutes a conclusion of guilt for shooting Tippit or indicative of preplanned assassination of JFK.

One example of “strange “ behavior that is counter to what one would expect of a guy carrying a rifle is that Oswald did not immediately take the package out of Fraziers car and start walking to the TSBD. According to  Fraziers WC testimony , Oswald waited  by a fence with the package in hand for several minutes while Frazier ran the engine of his car apparently because his battery was weak or his alternator wasn’t charging the battery enough.

The only other examples  which MIGHT be interpreted as evidence of lies  are the 2 the camera recordings of Oswald:

A. When asked in the hallway the specific question “Did you shoot the President”? Oswald’s answer was “I didn’t shoot anybody” which indicates possibly a subconscious presumption he’s being asked about shooting Tippit also.

B. At the midnight conference, when asked again “Did you shoot the President? Oswald’s initial answer was “Nobody has charged me with that yet”  and “ I really don’t know what this is all about”, after which statements Oswald must have recalled his  earlier hallway answer , and corrected himself by saying “The first I heard of it was when I was asked by a reporter”.

 So Oswald trying to pretend : “I don’t  know what this is  all about “ realized too late that he DID know what it’s all about because he just earlier had answered that he hadn’t shot ANYBODY. And he also had stated that “they”were taking him in because  he had lived in the USSR and that he was just a patsy.

Since many CTs , (myself included 🙄 ) were all too willing to believe FBI agent Hosty note that  Oswald had gone outside to watch the P.Parade, then it might be evidence that Oswald  lied since the “Prayerman” figure has been reasonably concluded NOT to be Oswald.

34

BTW, there is one coincidence involving CE399 that I find provocative, and have never seen discussed. Many skeptics say that CE399 was found not on Connally's stretcher, but on a different stretcher that carried a young boy named Ronnie Fuller back to minor surgery to have a nasty cut sewn up. This stretcher was piloted through the Parkland ER suite by a nurse's aide named Rosa Majors. But that's not the only role she played that day. Before Fuller needed help, Majors was in Trauma Room 2 while the medical staff was assessing Connally's wounds.  Her job there was to take possession of Connally's clothing, removing and collecting Connally's personal effects therefrom. That would have put her in prime contention of finding a bullet that had fallen from the wound in Connally's thigh. And if CE399 was indeed found on Fuller's stretcher, and was deliberately placed on it, then she becomes a prime suspect in placing there.

The confusion started with Tomlinson being unsure which stretcher CE399 was on. Recently SS Agent Paul Landis further muddied the waters with his statement that he found a bullet on the seat of the limo and put it in his pocket. He later placed it on a stretcher. It seems plausible to me that the bullet that made the shallow entry into JBC's thing before popping out could end up on his car seat. Also plausible Landis would put it in his pocket. It seems very odd to me that he would just casually put the bullet down on a stretcher. I can understand the Landis was probably not involved in many if any crime scene investigations but common sense should have told him that was a key piece of evidence that needed to be secured. I don't know if we can ever be sure exactly where  CE399 ended up but the important this is we know where it came from, Oswald's rifle.
35
Grodens an honest guy doing his best in a complex case. Cut him some slack. At least he's out there trying to make things happen all these years.
36

Someone on that other web forum has posted Lifton's "Pig on an Leash," which all but accuses Groden of being a thief and grifter. It's interesting reading if you have the time.
37
MT:

Thanks for your comments.

It could be hubris, or more gently, an informed but incorrect opinion on Cyril Wecht's part.

Wecht has credentials on this topic far exceeding mine, so I am loath to contradict Wecht. I lean to Wecht's explanation.

My layman's opinion is Gov JBC could not have held his right-hand grip on the Stetson after being shot through the dorsal side of the right wrist by the large and heavy slug, issued from an M-C.

The M-C, and related Western Cartridge ammo, is right on the borderline of what is considered a high-powered rifle (or carbine if you want to get technical).

The average muzzle velocity of the Western Cartridge Company (WCC) 6.5×52mm Carcano ammunition (CE-399) fired from the Mannlicher-Carcano rifle was approximately 2,165 feet per second (fps).

The slug might have slowed down by the time it struck JBC's wrist, if we assume it passed through JBC's chest first.

Curiously, the WC held that the Western Cartridge slug "tumbled" inside of JBC's wrist, causing even more damage than if it had tunneled through. Ouch!

Like I said, I am just a layman, but...really? JBC held onto the Stetson even after CE-399 "tumbled" through his wrist?

Another side question: After the Western Cartridge slug passed through JBC's wrist, then it burrowed into JBC left thigh, by the WC account.

After that, the slug from the thigh should have been retrieved by a nurse or attendant, and put into an envelope. All hospitals, even then, saved bullets as standard procedure, and all gunshots had to be reported to local police, for good and obvious reasons.

I would expect that in such a high-profile murder and attempted murder case, the slug from JBC's thigh would, of course, be placed into an envelope and marked by a nurse or attendant as such. This is really basic. I cannot imagine these procedures were not followed.

Yet the WC holds that CE-399 was found several floors below the JBC operating room, either on the floor, or near or underneath a gurney, near an elevator, by Parkland employee Darryl Tomlinson.

Huh?

That has always struck me as curious. I will probably post on this soon.

Caveat emptor, and draw your own conclusions.
BC: It could be hubris, or more gently, an informed but incorrect opinion on Cyril Wecht's part. Wecht has credentials on this topic far exceeding mine, so I am loath to contradict Wecht. I lean to Wecht's explanation.

Other experienced MEs (Baden, Loqvam, Spitz, et al) don't have a problem with Connaly continuing to hold his hat. Artwohl, an MD if not an ME, was also okay with it. In the realm of medical experts who pay attention to the issue, Wecht is in a small minority here. It may even be a minority of one.


Curiously, the WC held that the Western Cartridge slug "tumbled" inside of JBC's wrist, causing even more damage than if it had tunneled through. Ouch!

Something like that. The WC maintained, after Gregory, that the bullet was traveling backwards when it struck Connally's wrist. The presence of a small metallic fragment just below the surface of the thigh wound indicated to them that the bullet was still travelling backwards when it his the thigh. The bullet must have begun tumbling before it hit the wrist in order for it to impact butt-first, but it doesn't seem to have tumbled too much while travelling through the wrist and into the thigh. All of that being said, would it really have made a difference?


[BC] After that, the slug from the thigh should have been retrieved by a nurse or attendant, and put into an envelope. All hospitals, even then, saved bullets as standard procedure, and all gunshots had to be reported to local police, for good and obvious reasons. I would expect that in such a high-profile murder and attempted murder case, the slug from JBC's thigh would, of course, be placed into an envelope and marked by a nurse or attendant as such. This is really basic. I cannot imagine these procedures were not followed.

Oh boy, would that have been helpful, now wouldn't it!?

CE399 was picked up by a SS agent stationed in the hallway near the elevators after being ratted out by Tomlinson. There was then a short comedic interlude whereby the SS agent, Parkland security director OP Wright, and a couple of FBI men argued over  who should have jurisdiction over the bullet. Presumably, the SS guy though he was being clever when he chose "rock", while Wright and the FBI guys were more experienced at this and all chose "paper," Leaving the Secret Service in possession of the little copper-coated t*rducken.

BTW, there is one coincidence involving CE399 that I find provocative, and have never seen discussed. Many skeptics say that CE399 was found not on Connally's stretcher, but on a different stretcher that carried a young boy named Ronnie Fuller back to minor surgery to have a nasty cut sewn up. This stretcher was piloted through the Parkland ER suite by a nurse's aide named Rosa Majors. But that's not the only role she played that day. Before Fuller needed help, Majors was in Trauma Room 2 while the medical staff was assessing Connally's wounds.  Her job there was to take possession of Connally's clothing, removing and collecting Connally's personal effects therefrom. That would have put her in prime contention of finding a bullet that had fallen from the wound in Connally's thigh. And if CE399 was indeed found on Fuller's stretcher, and was deliberately placed on it, then she becomes a prime suspect in placing there.
38
I wonder how many of the people who don't think Oswald could get from the 6th floor lto the 2nd floor lunchroom in time for his encounter with Baker believe he moved from the front steps in time for the meeting with Baker. There's as much chance that it is Elvis in the doorway than it is Oswald.

As for Groden, I last saw him at a table next to the GK selling his self-published books because none of the publishing houses would peddle his crap anymore. I almost felt sorry for him. Almost.
39
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: U.S. Politics
« Last post by John Corbett on Yesterday at 05:55:17 PM »
   So we pay a little more for gas. So what? Some of us remember the 70's when there was literally no gas. Gas stations were closed with literally no gas on hand. People were unable to drive to work, school buses shut down, etc. Paying a little more for gas is worth the short term pain to remove these jerk wads from holding the world hostage via the straits stuff. And then there's the hanging of dissidents in their public square. "Braveheart" stuff. These savages gotta go. And Trump is the only leader with the Balls to make that happen.

I wasn't around during WWII but people on the home front were asked to sacrifice a lot more than Americans are today. Their gasoline was rationed. So were staples such as sugar, meat, and coffee. New cars weren't produced for 4 years because auto factories were converted to productions of tanks, aircraft,
jeeps, etc. I can't get too worked up for whiny people who have to pay a bit more for gas at the pump for a few months. Suck it up, buttercups.
40
    I ask this Forum to look at the above. NO Quotes + NO Sources = Total  BS:
    The above is in stark contrast to my proving "That Ain't Haygood" with:  (1) Documented Timelines + (2) Sworn Testimonies.
Again, if you were as knowledgeable about Harkness' movements as you claim to be, it should be easy for you to address specifically each point I made.

It appears that you can't do it. Which reflects on the quality and quantity of your "research"
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10