If not now, when?

Considering historical precedent for exhuming the remains of a former US President,
and the examination of those remains comprising this precedent being much more
vague and broader in scope than the long standing, specific public interest in just
two small areas of a wrist and a thigh of the late John Connolly, how is this inquiry unreasonable
compared to precedent?

https://www.politico.com/story/2011/06/zachary-taylors-body-exhumed-june-17-1991-057126
06/16/2011 10:45
On this day in 1991, researchers exhumed the body of Zachary Taylor to deal with persistent speculation that Southern politicians had arranged to have the nation’s 12th president poisoned because he opposed extending slavery to the Western territories....

....along with strong evidence the target of the present inquiry, former Texas Governor John Connolly later behaved remarkably similarly to a traitor,
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,5128.msg183405.html#msg18340

...is it now long past time that his remains be exhumed and then scanned for metal fragments for the purpose of weighing them and adding the
resulting total weight to the weight of CE399.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1993/06/18/connally-takes-bullet-pieces-to-grave/1cab4644-c1be-4499-8d85-ed3bae858d17/
CONNALLY TAKES BULLET PIECES TO GRAVE
June 18, 1993

....FBI officials in Dallas had recommended that an attempt be made to recover the evidence and settle a long-standing controversy about whether Connally was hit by the same bullet that wounded President John F. Kennedy on Nov. 22, 1963, just before Kennedy was killed by another bullet that tore into his skull.

Dallas FBI agent Oliver B. Revell said he feared that a barrage of lawsuits would be discomfiting to the Connally family in the years ahead unless the fragments were recovered. "We hate to intrude into the family's grief," Revell said a few hours before the final graveside ceremonies, "but it's going to happen sooner or later. I'm afraid the family is going to be harassed on this until it's resolved."

The "single bullet" or "magic bullet" theory was crucial to the Warren Commission's findings that Lee Harvey Oswald, acting alone, killed the president and wounded Connally as the two men rode together in a motorcade through downtown Dallas.
......
..."It's really offensive," said George Christian, a longtime Connally friend and once his press secretary. "Nobody in the Connally family that I know of ever heard of these fragments."

Revell said there was a fragment in one of Connally's thighs and perhaps some traces in a wrist....

I asked:

"If you have a single scrap of evidence that CE399 was the bullet recovered from Parkland, do share it."

There is no evidence that CE399 was found at Parkland.
The three men involved with the discovery of a bullet at Parkland ALL refused to identify CE399 as that bullet.
O P Wright categorically denied CE399 was the bullet found at Parkland.
CE399 was entered into evidence as the bullet found at Parkland without a single witness identifying it as such.
Tomlinson, the man who discovered the bullet, wasn't asked to identify it during his closed WC interview.

There is not a single scrap of evidence that CE399 was the bullet found at Parkland and lots of evidence demonstrating it wasn't.
Prix like Graves are here to disinform and misinform.
What an unbelievable KGB-loving loser he is.

Dear danny BOY o'meara,

If CE-399 wasn't found on or near (as in on the floor) Connally's gurney in Parkland (or implausibly by Landis "above the limo's rear seat"), it must have been snuck into "evidence" by the evil, evil, bad guys, right?

If so, how, why, and when did they deform it so strangely when they fired it through Oswald's Carcano?

-- Tom

Considering where I came from and what I had to overcome ... well, yes, kind of proud. I think that's why I get under the skin of some folks here: I don't hate myself - quite the opposite, in fact. I have no false humilty about the abilities with which I've been blessed. I have no false humility about what I've achieved solely through my own efforts despite pretty long odds. I am by no means arrogant; I am simply content with myself and my life, which drives people like you and Dan crazy. At 76, I have no reason to humor nutcases like you or angry buffoons like Dan. I know nothing about either one of you, but my guess would be that life hasn't turned out the way you'd hoped. If someone wants to deal with me on reasonable and reasonably normal terms, that's what they'll get back from me. If they want to play silly games, they'll get their silly games shoved back up their asses because I'm really, really good at it.

You're at least borderline insane - of this I'm convinced. There is something very, very wrong with Dan; I have no idea what it is, but he's consumed by anger and bile completely out of proportion to whatever is consuming him is worth. You both need help - badly - and a JFKA forum is probably not the place to find it. This place is little more than an outlet for your insanity and anger. I wish you well, but your problems aren't my problems and I assure you I will never again respond to anything either of you says. Rant on, but shove it up your ass as far as I'm concerned.

 I will never again respond to anything either of you says.

 
What did I post but a couple of hours ago - "If my watch is correct it's almost time for you to run away"
Right on cue, the delusional Payette beats his hasty retreat.
And as I have posted every time he disappears - your absence will be sorely unmissed.

The trick with Nutters like Payette, Smith, Corbett etc. is to introduce the most simple facts that undermine their spoon-fed beliefs. And there are so many such facts in this case.
Goodbye Lance. 

You must be very proud of yourself, Macho Genius Fancy Pants Rants!

Considering where I came from and what I had to overcome ... well, yes, kind of proud. I think that's why I get under the skin of some folks here: I don't hate myself - quite the opposite, in fact. I have no false humilty about the abilities with which I've been blessed. I have no false humility about what I've achieved solely through my own efforts despite pretty long odds. I am by no means arrogant; I am simply content with myself and my life, which drives people like you and Dan crazy. At 76, I have no reason to humor nutcases like you or angry buffoons like Dan. I know nothing about either one of you, but my guess would be that life hasn't turned out the way you'd hoped. If someone wants to deal with me on reasonable and reasonably normal terms, that's what they'll get back from me. If they want to play silly games, they'll get their silly games shoved back up their asses because I'm really, really good at it.

You're at least borderline insane - of this I'm convinced. There is something very, very wrong with Dan; I have no idea what it is, but he's consumed by anger and bile completely out of proportion to whatever is consuming him is worth. You both need help - badly - and a JFKA forum is probably not the place to find it. This place is little more than an outlet for your insanity and anger. I wish you well, but your problems aren't my problems and I assure you I will never again respond to anything either of you says. Rant on, but shove it up your ass as far as I'm concerned.

You must be very proud of yourself, Macho Genius Fancy Pants Rants!

Your infatuation with Payette is nauseating.