Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10
31
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: U.S. Politics
« Last post by Tom Graves on Yesterday at 03:07:01 AM »
You claimed that Trump won the 2016 election only with Putin's help.

I said Trump "won" only with Putin's help.

Regardless, why are you avoiding the fact that the HSCA and the Republican-controlled Senate Select Committee on Intelligence were both basically right in their conclusions, i.e., Lee Harvey Oswald killed JFK, and the Kremlin tried very hard to harm Clinton and help Trump in the 2016 election?


Libertarians are the worst.

Especially pro-Trump Libertarians.
32
They mention the lapel flip at 34:50. There are some good comments re what/how a slug might cause the lapel flip (but no mention of jacket bulge). Anyhow they do not mention that Lattimer wrote that the lapel flip needed a big bulge & that a bulge needed lots of outshoot debris & that that needed a yawing/tumbling slug at exit, & that that needed the slug to pass throo a jfk firstly.

The oblong entry wound on JBC's back and the flattening of the bullet at the base, not the nose of the bullet is proof positive the bullet was yawing after it exited from JFK's throat.
33
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: U.S. Politics
« Last post by John Corbett on Yesterday at 02:55:07 AM »
The HSCA was correct in concluding that Lee Harvey Oswald killed JFK.

The Republican-controlled Senate Select Committee on Intelligence was correct in concluding that the Kremlin strongly interfered in our 2016 election with the goal of harming Clinton and helping Trump.


Libertarians are the worst.

Especially pro-Trump Libertarians.

Your claim was that Trump won the 2016 election ONLY with Putin's help. I asked you for evidence that Trump won ONLY because of Putin's help. As I surmised, you have no such evidence. You simply asserted something you cannot prove. Unsupported assumptions such as yours are easy to dismiss.
34
For the sake of argument, let's say you are correct that the motorcycle cop is not Haygood. What difference does that make?

   "What difference does that make?".  Your asking that question says a lot regarding your limited foundational knowledge of the JFK Assassination. You merit your seat at the kiddie table. Put in the time and do the research.
35
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: U.S. Politics
« Last post by Tom Graves on Yesterday at 01:05:50 AM »
It should be pointed out that a congressional committee also found that there was likely a conspiracy to assassinate JFK so findings of such committees should be taken with a grain of salt.

The HSCA was correct in concluding that Lee Harvey Oswald killed JFK.

The Republican-controlled Senate Select Committee on Intelligence was correct in concluding that the Kremlin strongly interfered in our 2016 election with the goal of harming Clinton and helping Trump.


Libertarians are the worst.

Especially pro-Trump Libertarians.
36
They mention the lapel flip at 34:50. There are some good comments re what/how a slug might cause the lapel flip (but no mention of jacket bulge). Anyhow they do not mention that Lattimer wrote that the lapel flip needed a big bulge & that a bulge needed lots of outshoot debris & that that needed a yawing/tumbling slug at exit, & that that needed the slug to pass throo a jfk firstly.
37
  Officer Harkness gave WC Testimony. He details the order in which he did things after the kill shot. And YOU wanted to use the Nat Geo snippet as evidence? Unfortunately, you were unaware that the snippet shows the Harkness 3 Wheel Motorcycle double parked right next to Inspector Sawyer's car. Why? Because Harkness helped load Euins into Inspector Sawyer's car. Time? 12:37 PM. From this point, Harkness helped secure the area behind the TSBD. This is where we see him and the alleged Officer Haygood on the Darnell Film. Time? 12:38 PM. It is impossible for Officer Haygood to be inside the railroad yard at 12:38. And remember that we see this same cop earlier on the Darnell Film. It is impossible for Haygood to be back inside the railroad yard at 12:37 PM. Haygood made a documented 12:35 radio transmission from his motorcycle parked near the Triple Underpass. From 12:35 PM on, Haygood was conducting interviews near his motorcycle. Tague's testimony corroborates this. I have steadfastly been all over this issue for 2+ years now. Every single piece of evidence I continue to gather further Proves the DPD motorcycle cop on the Darnell Film can Not be Haygood.

For the sake of argument, let's say you are correct that the motorcycle cop is not Haygood. What difference does that make?
38
Great episode, Fred.  There was way too much common sense being thrown around for the conspiracy crowd to handle.
39

  Officer Harkness gave WC Testimony. He details the order in which he did things after the kill shot. And YOU wanted to use the Nat Geo snippet as evidence? Unfortunately, you were unaware that the snippet shows the Harkness 3 Wheel Motorcycle double parked right next to Inspector Sawyer's car. Why? Because Harkness helped load Euins into Inspector Sawyer's car. Time? 12:37 PM. From this point, Harkness helped secure the area behind the TSBD. This is where we see him and the alleged Officer Haygood on the Darnell Film. Time? 12:38 PM. It is impossible for Officer Haygood to be inside the railroad yard at 12:38. And remember that we see this same cop earlier on the Darnell Film. It is impossible for Haygood to be back inside the railroad yard at 12:37 PM. Haygood made a documented 12:35 radio transmission from his motorcycle parked near the Triple Underpass. From 12:35 PM on, Haygood was conducting interviews near his motorcycle. Tague's testimony corroborates this. I have steadfastly been all over this issue for 2+ years now. Every single piece of evidence I continue to gather further Proves the DPD motorcycle cop on the Darnell Film can Not be Haygood.
40
??? Pay attention, you missed my point.   

There's no mystery concerning who it is not, it is not Oswald, that is all we need to know.

The identity of the Female which would be interesting to know is not important.

In the Wiegman Willis comparison, the time taken between photographs is not relevant or necessary to submit an opinion of the mystery person's Female gender


    Your declaring there is "no mystery" does not make this so. There's plenty of males that look like Prayer Man. Plugging a male "look alike" into that same spot would Not prove that Prayer Man is a man either. Your "look alike" plug-in female is actual "proof" of nothing. I thought you were claiming the 2 images you posted were of the same female. Now THAT, would have been proof.  Prayer Man has become Kamp's flag ship issue and until he waves the white flag, that issue will remain alive and kicking contrary to your declaration. We need to keep the "Proof Bar' high and not impose a double standard depending on which side of the issue the proffer is coming from. 
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10