Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10

JFK Assassination & General Discussion & Debate / Re: Jeff Morley Goes Pro-IRGC Mouthpiece...Demented Politics? GOP?

« Last post by Tom Scully on Today at 02:00:34 AM »

Quote from: Benjamin Cole on July 10, 2026, 06:09:57 AM

TG-

Do you dislike the Donks and the Phants equally?

On any given day...

Lately, with the Mamdani-stan wing of the D-Party becoming ascendant...maybe 60/40 favor for the GOP.

But, in general it is a race to the bottom between these two parties....

I like Marco Rubio.

You post the best opinions wealthiest donors' to GOP money can buy!

The "T" is trillion. On election day, 2024, The US Gov's DOJ, FBI, IRS, the Courts, could still hold Musk and Trump accountable.
They do not eviscerate the government on behalf of the vast majority of voters who voted for Trump.
Once the billionaires arrive at the point they've purchased all the goods and services they could ever want, they buy up the government and destroy its
ability to be responsive to anyone other than them.

But here you are, railing against the comparatively powerless mayor of NYC who, on his worst day, is a vastly more ethical public servant responsive to
practical concerns of millions more US residents than Trump and his entire cabinet of billionaires. At most, the Trump regime is responsive to the concerns
and priorities of no more than 0.5% of the US population, approx. 1,700,000 people.

https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/dataviz/dfa/distribute/chart/

Distribution of Household Wealth in the U.S.

JFK Assassination & General Discussion & Debate / Audio of HSCA’s Interviews with Fidel Castro

« Last post by Denis Morissette on Today at 01:47:05 AM »

Anyone knows the name of that 1967? Maybe Clear the Air in which a British journalist claims that Fidel Castro told him that Castro would have said that Kennedy should be killed. Anyone knows about this? Also, Robert Blakey addresses the Mysterious Deaths Project. Sylvia Duran is discussed as well. Click on CC on the video. and request Translation in English. I suggest you use Speed 1.7X.

I posted 3 videos.

https://youtube.com/@denismorissettejfk?si=XZyaqgaJMeVm7xKM

JFK Assassination & General Discussion & Debate / Re: Jeff Morley the IRGC $tooge...And Key Luna Com'tee Staffer?

« Last post by Benjamin Cole on Today at 01:35:40 AM »

TC--

DJT strikes me as a loose cannon rolling around on deck, especially in his Truth Social posts.

But, no matter DJT's flaws, or America's flaws, they pale in comparison to Putin, and the IRGC.

Western liberal democracies are not perfect, but they are pretty good.

Putin and the IRGC are ugly x 100.

Why Western leftists have taken to valorizing Putin, the IRGC and terrorist proxies...staggers the imagination.

Why Morley is posting pro-IRGC tweets on "X"...raises questions about Morley's agenda, and why he dog-whistled "Mossad perped the JFKA" while on the Tucker Carlson show.

JFK Assassination & General Discussion & Debate / Re: Jeff Morley the IRGC $tooge...And Key Luna Com'tee Staffer?

« Last post by Tom Scully on Today at 12:56:48 AM »

Quote from: Benjamin Cole on July 11, 2026, 03:48:10 AM

Here Jeff Morley says the IRGC is not so bad...the real danger is in Riyadh.

How long has Morley been carrying water for the iRGC? Paid or not?

https://newrepublic.com/article/153537/growing-obsession-linking-iran-terrorism

Quote

Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump · July 10, 2026, 11:18 PM

1000 Missiles are Locked and Loaded and aimed at the Islamic Republic of Iran, with thousands of more to immediately follow, should the Iranian Government act on its threat, pronounced in many corners of the Globe, to assassinate, or attempt to assassinate, the sitting President of the United States of America, in this case, ME! Orders have already been given, and the U.S. Military is ready, willing, and able, for a one year period of time, subject to extension, to completely decimate and destroy all areas of Iran – PRAISE BE TO ALLAH! President DONALD J. TRUMP

JFK Assassination & General Discussion & Debate / Re: Jeff Morley Goes Pro-IRGC Mouthpiece...Demented Politics? GOP?

« Last post by Tom Scully on Today at 12:53:21 AM »

Quote from: John Corbett on Yesterday at 04:33:03 PM

I like Rubio too and if he's the GOP nominee for POTUS in 2028, I will gladly vote for him. I think the nomination is J. D. Vance's to lose. A lot can happen between now and the early primaries and caucuses in 2028, but I expect Vance to be the nominee. Rubio would make a great #2.

There are no Democrats who I would even consider voting for in 2028. The Democrat Party has become so toxic with their embracing of the Marxist agenda that I won't consider anybody who is willing to put a D next to their name. I like John Fetterman but he isn't going to be on the national ticket and I live in the neighboring state of Ohio so I can't vote for him anyway. If he is going to remain in the Senate, he will have to switch parties because he will be primaried by the Democrats. Arlen Specter made that move in the oppositive direction. There is one other Democrat I like because he shows some common sense and the courage to call out the far left but I can't imagine him gaining any traction even if he does choose to run. That would be Stephen A. Smith who is a long shot to run and end even longer shot to win the nomination. The Commies are now controlling the primary process in the Democrat Party and not just on the coasts. I hope the Dems nominate AOC. It might be enough to make me believe there is a God.

You like Venezuela's new viceroy. Your post is scary. If you move any further to the right of the spectrum, you risk falling over the edge!
You're so extreme, you referred to the Democratic party by using an epithet.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democrat_Party_(epithet)

Quote

https://www.usatoday.com › story › news › politics › 2026 › 01 › 04 › marco-rubio-takes-charge-venezuela › 88008997007

Marco Rubio to 'run' Venezuela with Maduro's inner circle
Jan 4, 2026 As the question of who's in charge of Venezuela looms, Marco Rubio prepares to work with Delcy Rodriguez, sworn in after Maduro's capture.

Quote

https://www.bostonherald.com/2026/06/18/us-kills-three-on-boat/
US strike on an alleged drug boat kills 3 in the eastern Pacific Ocean
July 12, 2026
The military did not provide evidence that the vessel was ferrying drugs. At least 211 have been killed in such strikes since September..

Quote

https://www.justsecurity.org/137325/us-cuba-embargo-international-law/
April 29, 2026
.....
In this article, we examine the international law dimensions of the U.S. campaign against Cuba. As we will explain, whatever one calls what the United States is doing — blockade, embargo, oil denial campaign — it is not a “blockade” in the sense of the law of naval warfare, for no international armed conflict with Cuba exists. The applicable bodies of law are instead the U.N. Charter’s prohibition on the threat or use of force and the customary international law rule of non-intervention.

Blockade Under the Law of Naval Warfare?
Quote

Remember Nuremberg?

Quote

https://www.state.gov/releases/office-of-the-spokesperson/2026/03/secretary-of-state-marco-rubio-remarks-to-press-6/
Secretary of State Marco Rubio Remarks to Press
Mar 2, 2026SECRETARY RUBIO: There absolutely was an imminent threat, and the imminent threat was that we knew that if Iran was attacked - and we believe they would be attacked - that they would immediately come after us, and we were not going to sit there and absorb a blow before we responded...

Quote

journals.law.harvard.edu

https://journals.law.harvard.edu/ilj/2017/04/continued-debate-over-the-crime-of-aggression-a-supreme-international-irony/
....
Continued Debate Over the Crime of Aggression: A Supreme International ...
The Charter defined "crimes against peace" as the "planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression, or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances, or participation in a Common Plan or Conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the foregoing."
.....
....At Nuremberg, it was the United States that pressed for including aggressive war-making as an indictable offense.[9] The Charter defined “crimes against peace” as the “planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression, or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances, or participation in a Common Plan or Conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the foregoing.”[10] It went on to specify that “[l]leaders, organizers, instigators and accomplices participating in the formulation or execution of a Common Plan or Conspiracy to commit any of the foregoing crimes are responsible for all acts performed by any persons in execution of such plan.”[11]..

Quote

https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/international-crime-and-justice/crime-of-aggression/6F12A1F54C3724553D7E2EF7DCEF68B1
The Crime of Aggression (Chapter 43) - International Crime and Justice
International Crime and Justice - November 2010 The crime of aggression, or crime against peace, has been famously labeled as the "supreme international crime" by Robert H. Jackson, the Chief American Prosecutor at the Nuremberg trials. Of the twenty-two former Nazi leaders tried in Nuremberg, twelve...

JFK Assassination & General Discussion & Debate / Re: CIA Wallets at Tenth and Patton

« Last post by Mitch Todd on Today at 12:30:20 AM »

Quote from: Martin Weidmann on June 29, 2026, 02:53:03 AM

Did Bentley say that he engraved his initials on the gun at the same time as Hill, Carroll, Walker, and McDonald? No. You're assuming that all of the officers itnitalled the weapon at the same time, but there's nothing in the record that requires, implies, or suggests that this is the case.

Moving the goalpost again? This is exactly the kind of BS that I have seen coming from you in previous conversations. Hill said he had the revolver all the time, until he handed it over to Lt Baker. Your suggestion that Bentley initialed the revolver before everybody else did is an assumption for which there is no evidence. It also doesn't make any sense!

Oh, but it does. You just won't let the sunshine into your mind. Carrol testified to the same thing:

First you claim that Hill's testimony implied it (which it didn't) and now you come up with Carroll who only believes that Bentley and Lyons had already left and doesn't even recall if Westbrook was there.

Wow, that's some solid "evidence"

The one good thing coming out of this is the fact that there also isn't a solid chain of custody for the wallet, just like there isn't one for the revolver, the gray jacket and CE 399.

Because you kept emphasizing Bentley, so that's what I responded to. Your Bentley angle has crashed and burned, so now you want to change the subject.

Nope.. the question about Rose and Walker was already asked before you joined the conversation. The fact that you ~~don't understand~~ ignored that shows exactly your strategy of talking about anything except the matter I wanted to discuss.

And my Bentley angle hasn't crashed and burned. You haven't even come close to making a coherent argument. All you are doing is cherry picking evidence and throwing it at the wall to see what sticks.

As for the original question, which directly relates to the existence of two wallets, you are still completely lost in the dark.

I said it before and I'll repeat it now; talking to you is a waste of time!

MW: Hill said he had the revolver all the time, until he handed it over to Lt Baker.

He used the word "possession" which is a little more permissive than you'd like to think. Westbrook said that it was lying on the desk in the Personnel squad room when he walked in. That would still fit "possession," as the squad room wasn't that big, while not strictly being on Hill's person. This leaves it open to Bentley putting his JH on it.

MW: Your suggestion that Bentley initialed the revolver before everybody else did is an assumption for which there is no evidence.

There is also no evidence against this happening.

MW: It also doesn't make any sense!

Hill tried to turn over the revolver to Baker when Oswald was deposited with the Homicide crew. If Bentley left early in the Personnel office report party, which everyone involved said happened, then Bentley wasn't around at 3:15 when Baker showed up to collect the revolver. It's possible that Bentley might have autographed the pistol while they were still in the homicide office thinking it was about the be transferred and didn't know when it wound up not being left in the Homicide office. Alternately, Bentley might have initialed the gun just before he left the Personnel office to go to the hospital; and ?Hill didn't mention this in his report because Bentley wasn't there at the actual time of transfer.

Also, you don't know what "moving the goalposts" means.

MW: First you claim that Hill's testimony implied it (which it didn't) and now you come up with Carroll who only believes that Bentley and Lyons had already left and doesn't even recall if Westbrook was there. Wow, that's some solid "evidence"

That's a lot more more evidence than you've provided of Bentley being present at the 3:15 handover of the revolver.

As for the wallet, Bentley said in his report that it was turned over before the arresting party left for the Personnel office. He said the same thing in the videotaped interviews that he made years later. That is, he put the wallet handover at the same time as Baker, Rose, et al. That was well before 3:15, and well before Baker came to the Personnel office to retrieve the revolver.

JFK Assassination & General Discussion & Debate / Re: The First Shot

« Last post by Andrew Mason on Yesterday at 10:38:48 PM »

Quote from: John Corbett on Yesterday at 04:21:03 PM

I will never understand why so many people look at eye and ear witness accounts as if they are empirical evidence.

Yes. You never will unless you actually work with witnesses.

Quote

Witness accounts, by themselves, do not establish anything as factual.

That is partly correct when dealing with a few witnesses who may not be independent. Without the opportunity of a party adverse in interest to cross-examine a witness it is difficult to assess a witness’ accuracy

Quote

Witnesses can be, and often are, wrong.

It depends on what you mean by “wrong”. There is a difference between seeing JFK move left after the first shot and “ducking” but a huge differnce between either of those and continuing to smile and wave for several seconds after the first shot.

Quote

The only time I will point to an eye or ear witness as evidence is if that witness can be corroborated by forensic evidence.

Most major crimes and virtually all minor ones that result in convictions are solved using witness evidence. If courts took that approach, there would be few convictions.

JFK Assassination & General Discussion & Debate / Re: How Did Bart Kamp Create The Lovelady Image?

« Last post by Tom Graves on Yesterday at 09:37:50 PM »

Quote from: Royell Storing on Yesterday at 09:16:17 PM

All I can say is you are very consistent. Consistently WRONG.

Dear Stormtrooper Storing,

You really should stop talking about yourself like that.

-- Tom

JFK Assassination & General Discussion & Debate / Re: How Did Bart Kamp Create The Lovelady Image?

« Last post by Royell Storing on Yesterday at 09:16:17 PM »

Quote from: Brian Doyle on Yesterday at 06:59:02 PM

Easily found on Google Images...

You now have a Trifecta of Mis ID's to your credit. (1) Shelley, (2) Lovelady, and (3) Molina. All I can say is you are very consistent. Consistently WRONG.

JFK Assassination & General Discussion & Debate / Re: How Did Bart Kamp Create The Lovelady Image?

« Last post by Tom Graves on Yesterday at 09:08:27 PM »

Quote from: Brian Doyle on Yesterday at 06:59:02 PM

Joe Molina is easily found on Google Images...

Just curious: As Credit Manager at the TSBD, did he wear a suit to work every day?

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10