Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10
31
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: U.S. Politics
« Last post by Tom Graves on Yesterday at 08:41:46 PM »
Groceries in my neck of the woods have really dropped since Trump took office. Gas, heating fuel, everything lower.

Sure they have.
32
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: U.S. Politics
« Last post by Jarrett Smith on Yesterday at 08:19:03 PM »
  Anyone that knows anything about the grocery industry Knows that the price of food in general does Not go down. (Other than "loss leaders" which are run in store adds for a very short term period). The absolute best outcome is the limiting of inflation/stabilizing food prices, vs wages increasing. This is what Trump accomplished in 2025. Lowering inflation vs increasing the "take home pay" of workers.   

Groceries in my neck of the woods have really dropped since Trump took office. Gas, heating fuel, everything lower.
33
What are you muttering now? 
Shouldn't you be under a bridge somewhere?

Yeah, xxxxxxx on you. 

(Rhymes with "hissing")
34
TG:

All good but why am I mentioned this paragraph?

5. He went to Moscow in July 1961, expressly noting in his diary that he did so without police permission, although he had written the American embassy in February 1961 that he could not leave Minsk without permission and he did not think it appropriate to request permission. If there is some kind of document check before boarding train or plane in the USSR, and if it was waived in his case as it would have to have Ben, he must have known that the authorities at least concurred in his travel, if they were not actually sponsoring it. When Marina joined him in Moscow it was suddenly, on little or no notice, so presumably she too circumvented the permission requirement or obtained it immediately without delay.

It was my one and only "marked card."

I did it at the request of W. Niederhut at the so-called JFK Assassination Debate - Education Forum.
35
Benjamin:  His staff erred and they erred twice in that document. Paul Hoch found the other error. We know there is an error because there is no such thing as a "contract source."

Find me one CIA document that uses that terminology.

The segregated collection is online and there are no underlying documents that support MacDonald. Just the opposite -- there are many documents
that say Shaw was NOT paid.

fred
36
No.  I didn't "claim" that Haygood used the radio on the 3-wheeler.  I asked you, "Could it be that Haygood made the transmission he made at 12:35 from the circled 3-wheel motorcycle which he's walking towards? ", because at that time I didn't have access to his testimony.  Thanks for pointing out that he made the transmission after he returned to his own motorcycle. 

 J.C. Bowles is who transcribed channels 1 and 2 of the police recordings in 1964 for the WC.
He was the communications supervisor at the time.

 Haygood's call number was 142.

     I do not see a "Bowles" listed as having been sworn in by the WC or HSCA. Do you know why the person assigning names to 11/22/63 DPD radio transmissions was not sworn in/documented?   
37
FL--

Yes, I think Paul Hoch found an error in McDonald's report.

But the McDonald 1992 report prominently identified Clay Shaw as a "highly paid contract source" on a highly inflammatory topic---in a report commissioned by the CIA.

This is not some whack-job by lefties or Jeff Morley dog-whistling "Mossad did it."

You see McDonald's record. He was no stranger to national security-foreign affairs. 

Your position, that you have not seen the underlying documents, ergo McDonald is in error---will, just doesn't hold water.

Why don't you be honest? Say something like, "I have not looked through the 64 HSCA boxes of documents, microfilm that McDonald and his staff did. I have tried to review the materials online, and have not found the underlying documents that would justify NcDonald's assertion that Shaw was a 'highly paid contract source.' There it stands."

You need not add that McDonald was a highly regarded historian deeply familiar with national defense and security issues. Maybe he erred. Or maybe you are shooting in the dark?
38
I have no idea what you are talking about.

Benjamin: What about the mistake that Paul Hoch found in the Macdonald report?

fred
39
Please don't put words in my mouth. His staff prepared that report and they made a couple of mistakes. That's all.

That's quite an assumption for an agency that doesn't write it down.
Did you find any, "...hieroglyphics that only two people knew what they meant..."?
40
Please don't put words in my mouth. His staff prepared that report and they made a couple of mistakes. That's all.
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10