Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10
31
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: U.S. Politics
« Last post by Tom Graves on Yesterday at 10:00:40 PM »
Magnificent to see England treating President Trump with all the dignity and respect that America deserves.  A stark contrast with how they were laughing at Biden's weakness.

Smith,

Are you a Russian troll?

You sound like a Russian troll.
32
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: U.S. Politics
« Last post by Richard Smith on Yesterday at 09:49:58 PM »
Magnificent to see England treating President Trump with all the dignity and respect that America deserves.  A stark contrast with how they were laughing at Biden's weakness. 
33
Because I just love it when CTers get into an internecine cat fight, I have continued to monitor the identical thread that Michael started at the Ed Forum. Cliff Varnell, who is the godfather of the Impossible Clothing Argument, says "Forget the damn necktie, willya??? We don't need it!"

I had failed to appreciate the subtlety of Cliff's argument. I thought he was positing a CIA melting ice bullet for the frontal throat wound and a dud Carcano round falling out of the shallow back wound. Cliff wisely points out that the back wound wasn't THAT shallow and a Carcano bullet wouldn't have simply fallen out.

For the back wound - and perhaps the throat wound as well - Cliff now posits a "blood soluble" bullet as developed for the CIA at the Army Biological Laboratory at Fort Detrick (MD) in connection with something called MKNAOMI, which you can read about here: https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/178-10004-10087.pdf. (Any document with "shellfish toxin" and "hand-launchers loaded with dog incapacitant" in it is worth reading, no?)

Wow, huh? Bad guys with blood-soluble bullets at both the front and rear! I had previously thought Lin Soo Mknaomi was just a South Korean professional golfer on the LPGA Tour, but now I'm starting to come around to Cliff's way of thinking on this.
34
I apologize for interrupting James' excellent work with my silliness, but opportunities to needle Tom simply cannot be resisted. His obsession with Gloria Calvery dates back something like 20 years, and it's mostly lost on me. All efforts to make Bill Shelley into the Second Most Interesting Man in the World are likewise lost on me. Since he consistently, from 11-22-63 to the WC, placed Oswald on the first floor at 11:50, I have a hard time picturing him as a conspirator - let alone a CIA operative or Oswald's FPCC leafletting buddy in New Orleans. I've never thought the two Sidewalk Guys were anyone other than Shelley and Lovelady, and Alan Ford's stuff has always just made my head hurt. Perhaps someone can explain the significance of all this to me?

Ah, I see that WC Sham Guy Dan has started Yet Another Calvery Thread that explains what a CTer thinks the significance is. Shelley was induced to dramatically change his story in order to accommodate the WC Sham but kept placing Oswald on the first floor at 11:50 when he could have just Shut the Hell Up about that? Well, perhaps ....

Oh, dear, my head is spinning. Over at Prayer Man, they are convinced (and make rather a good case with enhanced photos) that it is Shelley and Lovelady walking down the sidewalk and that they lied when they said they were on the steps. http://www.prayer-man.com/bill-shelley-and-billy-lovelady-in-the-couch-film/. Isn't this the opposite of what WC Sham Guy Dan says? Given the choice between Bart Kamp and WC Sham Guy Dan on almost anything, I must admit I'd go with Bart.
35
Not only does JFK's clothing prove that no bullet exited the throat and the shirt slits, and that no bullet nicked the tie knot, but it also proves that Dr. Carrico and Dr. Jones were truthful and correct when they said the throat wound was above the tie knot. The clothing further proves that Dr. Perry was correct when he identified the throat wound as an entrance wound, and that the nurses were the ones who nicked the tie and made the shirt slits, just as Dr. Carrico indicated and just as one of the nurses confirmed to Henry Hurt.

In addition, this all comes together to explain why the damage behind the throat wound was larger than the wound itself, why the wound was small and punched-in, and why there was more blood on the outside of the collar band than on the inside.

Furthermore, this explains the fact that, as we now know, at the autopsy the autopsy doctors absolutely, positively, and conclusively established that the back wound had no exit point, why they and others around the table could see the end of the probe pushing up against the lining of the chest cavity, and why the rear clothing holes were over 5 inches below the collar.
36
But, yes, I was referring to the professed fear of a nuclear Armageddon with the Soviet Union. Thanks to records released in 1993, we know that LBJ pressured Richard Russell and Earl Warren into serving on the WC by telling them that if the government didn't squash rumors that the Soviets and/or the Cubans were behind the JFK assassination, this could push the U.S. into a war that could “kill 40 million Americans in an hour.”

As we used to say about the General Counsel of the Mega Corp at which I worked, "Often wrong but never in doubt." Good thing you have a professional fact-checker like me to keep on your toes.

If not before, Earl Warren revealed what LBJ had said to him in the Memoirs of Chief Justice Earl Warren, published in 1977. You can read the relevant excerpt from his Memoirs here at page 7: https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol11/pdf/HSCA_Vol11_WC_1_Operations.pdf. That's HSCA Volume 11, "Creation of the Warren Commission."

The similar argument made to Russell did indeed come to light (as far as I can tell) when the fabled "LBJ tapes" were released by the National Archives in response to ARRB requests in 1993. If the theory is that LBJ made this argument to stack the deck at the WC and ensure a LN outcome, then he miscalculated rather badly in the case of Russell - eh? Russell was not only a naysayer at the WC but was practically a full-tilt CTer after LBJ's death. LBJ's pressure was apparently too subtle for Russell to get the message - eh?

When I'm not wearing my CT propellor beanie, I see no reason to think LBJ was not sincere in his concerns. Your "belief" that LBJ pressured "several senior military officers" with this argument to ensure a LN result at the autopsy has no foundation whatsoever as far as I can discern. We know that the Joint Chiefs had suggested to JFK that the loss of tens of millions of American lives in a nuclear war would be an acceptable price to pay, whereupon a dismayed JFK had said "And we call ourselves the human race." Why would we think your unnamed "senior military officers" would not have responded "Nuclear war? Cool!" to LBJ's argument?
37
Is there some reason you change avatars like they were popcorn? Why not just use an actual photo of yourself and stick with it, as I do?

Dear Lance,

A fancy-pants logo would suffice for you.

-- Tom
38
James,

Was Arce wearing a suit that day?

-- Tom
All of the TSBD order-fillers wore suits. It was an extremely formal warehouse. Oswald was a renegade, the Punk Who Wouldn't Wear a Suit (as Shelley famously called him). Arce had an orange pimp suit that was the envy of his order-filling peers, or at least that's what Weisberg reported in 1992.

More to the point, is there some reason you change avatars like they were popcorn? Why not just use an actual photo of yourself and stick with it, as I do? (Yes, that's me.) Some of these avatars are hysterical - shriveled up little old men who somehow identify with superheroes and whatnot.
39
The height analysis shows that the two men in Couch could include Billy Lovelady, but not Bill Shelley. Danny Arce is a good fit as the taller man.


James,

Was Arce wearing a suit that day, as the "Shelley" figure appears to be doing in the enlarged high-rez frame and the cropped-and-enhanced frames from Couch-Darnell that you can see by scrolling down a bit in this article at a certain website?

http://www.prayer-man.com/tsbd/billy-nolan-lovelady/

-- Tom
40
You folks didn't think I was going to allow my all-time favorite bit of persiflage to sink into oblivion, did you?

Yesterday, I happened to read two scathing reviews of Luna’s UFO (UAP) hearings by serious, longtime ufologists (yes, there are such things). Here is one: https://kevinrandle.blogspot.com/2025/09/restoring-public-trust-through-uap.html (“Well, that was a colossal waste of time.”). Both emphasized that these were clown shows in which the witnesses included some of the least-credible names in the field and nothing resembling actual evidence was presented. They also noted that the festivities played out in front of a nearly empty room.

Then I read this piece by a presidential historian and JFK biographer named Alexis Coe at MSNBC (so you know what her politics are): “I testified at a congressional hearing on the JFK files – I won’t make that mistake again,” https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/jfk-files-congress-conspiracy-theories-anna-paulina-luna-rcna210504.

She testified at the Dentist Don hearing. She, too, emphasizes what a non-serious effort these hearing are and how her perspective as an actual historian was distinctly unwelcome. She also notes that the room was almost empty. Some of her comments about the other guests are quite humorous, to wit: “They understood archives the way toddlers understand taxes: not at all, and mostly through tantrum.”

Here, my fellow Luna enthusiasts and CT hopefuls, is what the dais actually looks like during one of these bombshell hearings. In his heyday, Dentist Don had more people in his waiting room.


Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10