JFK Assassination Forum

What's revealing is that Michael Griffith said he believes in the HSCA acoustic evidence. That is four shots: three from the TSBD (or behind JFK) and one shot from the fence/GK (or to his right side.) That alone disproves a entrance shot to the throat. That's if, as he does, believe the acoustic analysis.

Apparently you haven't read my article on the acoustical evidence nor my posts in this forum on the subject. I've pointed out many times that the acoustical evidence does not automatically require one to believe that only four shots were fired and that three of them came from the alleged Oswald window, since the HSCA's Dealey Plaza test firing only fired shots from the sixth-floor window and from one spot behind the fence on the grassy knoll, and since, as the HSCA acoustical experts noted, a shot fired from several feet back from a window would not be recorded by the dictabelt (at least not recorded enough to detect). And, needless to say, shot fired by a gunman using a silencer would not have been recorded by the dictabelt.

Now, are you going to address the evidence that the throat wound was an entrance wound?

He also believes there was a shooter on top of the linen truck and that Babushka Lady was a CIA agent, June Cobb, and that she "possibly" shot JFK with a camera gun. That's two more shots. And he believes that Oswald conspired with Shaw and Ferrie in a triangulated assassination of JFK. That's another shooter, at least.

I'm not sure where you're getting half of this stuff. I've never said anything about a shooter on top of the linen truck, and I've never said that Oswald conspired with Shaw and Ferrie in a triangulated shooting of JFK (although I do believe there was triangulation, but not involving Oswald).

Yes, I do believe that June Cobb was a CIA agent, based on Mary Haverstick's ground-breaking research in her recent book A Woman I Know. I'm guessing you haven't read the book. And, yes, I do believe it's possible that the Babushka Lady, whether or not she was June Cobb, may have used a gun camera to fire a shot at JFK--again, based on Haverstick's research. Gun cameras were definitely a thing by 1963, and the Babushka Lady's actions seem odd and suspicious. See Haverstick's research.

Now, are you going to address the evidence that the throat wound was an entrance wound?

He has shooters all over Dealey Plaza shooting from various angles and locations. But he also believe the HSCA acoustic analysis of two shooters and two locations.

I don't have shooters "all over Dealey Plaza," and the acoustical evidence does not mean that only four shots were fired, as explained above.

Now, are you going to address the evidence that the throat wound was an entrance wound?

He believes in things that contradict other things that he believes. It's a mishmash of claims that are at odds with other claims. Day after day, week after week, month after month. For decades.

The supposed "contradictions" are in your mind and are based on your lack of knowledge of my research and of other scholarly research.

Now, are you going to address the evidence that the throat wound was an entrance wound? 

It's the classic example of a disordered conspiracy obsessed mind.

Well, of course. Anyone who disagrees with your minority view of the JFK case simply must have "a disordered conspiracy obsessed mind." It just can't be that your view on the case is a decidedly minority view because your version of the assassination is implausible and untenable. No, that just can't be. 

At least I'm in good company, since 2/3 to 3/4 of the Western world believes JFK was killed by a conspiracy, and since the last official federal investigation into the assassination concluded that JFK was killed by a conspiracy, that two gunmen were involved, that a shot came from the grassy knoll, that there is credible evidence that anti-Castro Cubans were trying to frame Oswald weeks before the assassination, that Jack Ruby had significant Mafia ties, that Ruby lied about how he entered the basement to shoot Oswald, that Ruby lied about why he shot Oswald, and that someone was moving boxes in the sixth-floor window within 2 minutes after the shooting when Oswald could not have been there.

Now, are you going to address the evidence that the throat wound was an entrance wound?

MTG should work in the legacy media. When they get caught in a lie, as MTG has been recently, they simply ignore it and move on to their next BS story.

This is one of the reasons I dismiss Nellie Connally's account of the assassination. In her version, JFK clutched his throat. I'll cut her some slack. Under the circumstances, it's perfectly understandable why she would be so bewildered about what was happening inside the car.

As Donald Trump recently said to his Energy Secretary Chris Wright, "Nobody cares".

Humm, a few weeks ago, your line was that you defer to the HSCA FPP and their "UNANIMOUS" findings. Then, confronted with some of the FPP's findings that wreak havoc on your version of the shooting, your next line was "I don't have to explain the medical evidence." Nah, of course not, because that would require you to at least know the basics about the medical evidence, which you clearly do not. And so now, your new line is "Nobody cares," i.e., that you don't care, which is perhaps your most honest line yet.

I accidentally deleted my original post so I am reposting it.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/florida-s-oldest-executed-inmate-s-last-words-revealed/ar-AA26yKl3?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=EDBBAN&cvid=6a3e6e2a27aa4507b21395079cd03e5e&ei=38

Florida just executed the oldest inmate to receive the death penalty. He was 74. Same age as me. The joke is he committed his murder in 1992. 25-30 years has become the norm for death penalty cases to exhaust appeals which is absurd. Another 74 year old man is scheduled to be executed later this year. When somebody receives the death penalty, they are more likely to die of hardening of the arteries before their sentence is carried out.

In the infamous In Cold Blood murder of the Clutter family in 1959 Dick Hickock and Perry Smith were hanged 5 1/2 years after their heinous act. It was never brought out in either the book or the movie but they were also the prime suspects in the slaughter of another family of four in Florida while they were on the lam from the Clutter murders. They were known to be in the area when the murders took place. It seems to me 5 1/2 years is a reasonable length of time to hear all appeals. Once that time period runs out, the only grounds for appeal that should be allowed is if compelling evidence is presented that the condemned person was innocent of the crime. If that can't be done, it's time to say, "Sorry about your bad luck. Adios".

I also think doing away with lethal injections would be a good step. I don't know why we ever did away with hanging. It worked quite well.