Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10
31
<chuckle>

How big is the truck you move your overinflated ego in? It must be massive....
32
Thank you for showing why you are not a credible person to talk to.

You have been warned. Try to mess with me from now on and be crushed as the weasel you are.

<chuckle>
33
 
   Was just reviewing some Dealey Plaza film shot the day after the assassination.  Looks like the filming was done from atop the Triple Underpass. And what do you know? There is a car coming down the Elm St Ext from the Railroad Yard. It's virtually impossible to see that car unless you are seriously looking for it. Those large trees and shrubs that are on the Knoll side of the Elm St Ext provide a natural "blind".
   The car was then parked in the, "NO PARKING At Any Time" zone, back from the corner, and almost directly across from the "wide open" Huge Gates. ALL of this just does not innocently "happen". This was an extremely well planned conspiracy.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
34
You've been exposed as a liar. The letter that you claimed showed Day had shown a "massive panic" doesn't say anything the remotely indicates anything of the sort. You simply fabricated the part about Day panicking about Frazier's polygraph. Why don't you just admit your deceit and move on.

Thank you for showing why you are not a credible person to talk to.

You have been warned. Try to mess with me from now on and be crushed as the weasel you are.
35
Good lord nobody is "masquerading" as a motorcycle cop. NOBODY believes this nonsense.

Roy thinks he's discovered something that armies of conspiracy hacks overlooked for 6+ decades. He probably thinks this is his ticket to fame and fortune. I hope he doesn't quit his day job.
36
The honest way of dealing with it was to admit you made a mistake and leave it at that. I would have accepted and respected that and moved on.

The crappy LN way is to try to weasel out of it by making up some bogus issue.

You got schooled and even if your arrogant ego has a problem with it, take your loss and I won't embarrass you further.

You're a little man who thinks he knows everything better than everybody else, but you walked straight into this one which shows you really know nothing at all.

So far, I've been kind to you. You tried to test me once and failed miserably. Care to test me again?
The honest way of dealing with it was to admit you made a mistake and leave it at that. I would have accepted and respected that and moved on.

The crappy LN way is to try to weasel out of it by making up some bogus issue.

You got schooled and even if your arrogant ego has a problem with it, take your loss and I won't embarrass you further.

You're a little man who thinks he knows everything better than everybody else, but you walked straight into this one which shows you really know nothing at all.

So far, I've been kind to you. You tried to test me once and failed miserably. Care to test me again?

You've been exposed as a liar. The letter that you claimed showed Day had shown a "massive panic" doesn't say anything the remotely indicates anything of the sort. You simply fabricated the part about Day panicking about Frazier's polygraph. Why don't you just admit your deceit and move on.
37

Duplicate
38
OK. I was wrong. You didn't make this up. You just lied about it. Earlier, you stated:

"The fact remains that Frazier passed the test and that was enough to cause massive panic by Lt Day"

Please point out anything in either document you posted that Day exhibited "massive panic". Sounds like Day's reaction was rather matter of fact.

The honest way of dealing with it was to admit you made a mistake and leave it at that. I would have accepted and respected that and moved on.

The crappy LN way is to try to weasel out of it by making up some bogus issue.

You got schooled and even if your arrogant ego has a problem with it, take your loss and I won't embarrass you further.

You're a little man who thinks he knows everything better than everybody else, but you walked straight into this one which shows you really know nothing at all.

So far, I've been kind to you. You tried to test me once and failed miserably. Care to test me again?
39
An honest forensic officer follows the evidence where it leads him.

A corrupt forensic officer, who thinks he has a "gun sack" but is then confronted with a credible witness, who is being polygraphed, who not only denies the "gun sack" was the one Oswald carried but also described the actual bag as flimsy, would desperately look for a way to explain the "gun sack" by claiming it's possible that Oswald placed the heavy duty "gun sack" in the flimsy bag Frazier described despite the fact that the heavy duty sack is far bigger than the flimsy bag.

That's not following the evidence, it's desperately trying to keep in play the heavy duty bag. So, much for an honest investigation. Of course, Day panicked, but they are not going to write that in a official report, are they now? Frazier said that Captain Fritz wanted to hit him for not identifying the heavy duty bag. That's the corrupt DPD for you!

Btw, this Lt Day is the same guy who days after the facts, when Oswald was dead and buried, produced a palmprint he claimed he had found on the rifle. The FBI found no trace of such a print and Latona said it was nearly impossible to take a print of a surface and leave no trace at all.
40
Back for a second for bit of fun;

You posted this, right;

I didn't know how to post images on this forum, but I've had some help, so here is the evidence that you said didn't exist.



 

Consider yourself schooled!

OK. I was wrong. You didn't make this up. You just lied about it. Earlier, you stated:

"The fact remains that Frazier passed the test and that was enough to cause massive panic by Lt Day"

Please point out anything in either document you posted that Day exhibited "massive panic". Sounds like Day's reaction was rather matter of fact.
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10