Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10
31
  So what Evidence do you have to refute my Proof that is NOT LOVELADY walking down the Elm St Extension on the Couch Film? I am waiting.

Why would anyone need to refute you?
32
   With your saying, "...I don't care...", your observations and opinions hold absolutely no standing. You have reduced yourself to being the equivalent of "flotsam and jetsam". You're merely "going with the flow". Which begs the question: Why Are You Here?

Long ago I came to realize there was no point in trying to convince the conspiracy hobbyists of the folly of their endeavor. I do this for amusement only. I know it is a silly hobby but I'm retired and have lots of time to spend on silly things.

In 35 years of engaging in online forums, I know of only one conspiracy hobbyist whose mind was changed and he gave me some credit for his conversion. That was Bob Artwohl. Perhaps some of you have heard of him. There was a service called Prodigy back around the time Oliver Stone's movie came out and we had a very active group of both Nutters and Loons as we called each other. Michael T. Griffith was one of the more ardent Loons. I see him posting occasionally on this forum as well.
33
You've conclusively proved that just like just like Flat-Earthers have conclusively proved that planet Earth is a giant Frisbee.

  So what Evidence do you have to refute my Proof that is NOT LOVELADY walking down the Elm St Extension on the Couch Film? I am waiting.
34
I don't know or care if it is Officer Haygood. I have no desire to follow conspiracy hobbyists on their never ending snipe hunts which have produced nothing of importance for the last 62 years and won't during the next 62 years. I have told this to many conspiracy hobbyists over the last few decades. Your silly theories will die with you and you will have accomplished nothing with all your efforts.

   With your saying, "...I don't care...", your observations and opinions hold absolutely no standing. You have reduced yourself to being the equivalent of "flotsam and jetsam". You're merely "going with the flow". Which begs the question: Why Are You Here?
35
I have now conclusively proven that 1 of those "2 Guys" is Not Lovelady. The advancements in technology which are producing better definition JFK Assassination images, are now exposing what amounts to JFK Assassination Urban Legends. Billy Lovelady simply can Not be in 2 different places at the very same time. Both Lovelady and Shelley gave WC testimony that they went down the Elm St Extension together. This means the other guy is Not Shelley. And it also means we have 2 unknown guys walking down the Elm St Ext only 20 seconds after the kill shot. How about vacating the Bart Kamp Camp and just admit what the Evidence clearly shows us? This is Not Lovelady walking down the Elm St Extension on the Couch Film. It does takes courage to separate yourself from the herd. You can do this. The EVIDENCE is on your side.

You've conclusively proved that just like just like Flat-Earthers have conclusively proved that planet Earth is a giant Frisbee.
36
I don't know which 2 guys you are referring to and I don't really are if either is Lovelady. It does nothing to establish that the car you are referring to is a getaway car. That's what I meant when I said you are asserting what you cannot prove.

     I have now conclusively proven that 1 of those "2 Guys" is Not Lovelady. The advancements in technology which are producing better definition JFK Assassination images, are now exposing what amounts to JFK Assassination Urban Legends. Billy Lovelady simply can Not be in 2 different places at the very same time. Both Lovelady and Shelley gave WC testimony that they went down the Elm St Extension together. This means the other guy is Not Shelley. And it also means we have 2 unknown guys walking down the Elm St Ext only 20 seconds after the kill shot. How about vacating the Bart Kamp Camp and just admit what the Evidence clearly shows us? This is Not Lovelady walking down the Elm St Extension on the Couch Film. It does takes courage to separate yourself from the herd. You can do this. The EVIDENCE is on your side.
37
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: U.S. Politics
« Last post by Tom Graves on Yesterday at 09:39:52 PM »
Nixon won in 1960. Trump won in 2020.

Dear Dana Rohrabacher I mean Royell Storing,

It's too bad that a Kremlin-loyal triple agent at the FBI's NYC field office (KGB Major Aleksey Kulak -- aka FEDORA -- sent by Gribanov to the FBI in early 1962) convinced Nixon in 1971 that the Kremlin had a complete copy of The Pentagon Papers (it didn't), and thereby duped him into setting up The Plumbers.

If Trump won in 2020 as you say, why did sixty courts say otherwise?

Because they're part of "The Deep State"?

-- Tom

PS

[Former U.S. Congressman] Rohrabacher is known for his longtime friendship with Putin and for his defense of "the Russian point of view".[73][74] On June 15, 2016, then-House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy told a group of Republicans, "'There's two people I think Putin pays: Rohrabacher and Trump. Swear to God'". Then-House Speaker Paul Ryan ended the conversation by saying "'No leaks. This is how we know we're a real family here'". The Republicans present were sworn to secrecy.[75] Brendan Buck, counselor to Paul Ryan, initially denied these reports, but was then told that The Washington Post had a recording.[76] After the recording was leaked by the Post in May 2017, McCarthy said the comment was intended as a joke.[75][36][77]

-- Wikipedia
38
   So are YOU rubber stamping that the above is DPD Motorcycle Officer Haygood? In spite of: (1) The timestamped radio calls of 12:35 Haygood and 12:36 Harkness? (2) the Cancellare Photo showing Haygood standing atop the Triple Underpass with BOTH gloves on, and (3) Haygood's WC Testimony not mentioning his doing any of what we see this alleged motorcycle officer doing on the Darnell Film.

I don't know or care if it is Officer Haygood. I have no desire to follow conspiracy hobbyists on their never ending snipe hunts which have produced nothing of importance for the last 62 years and won't during the next 62 years. I have told this to many conspiracy hobbyists over the last few decades. Your silly theories will die with you and you will have accomplished nothing with all your efforts.
39
   Do you agree that neither of these "2 Guys" is Lovelady?

I don't know which 2 guys you are referring to and I don't really are if either is Lovelady. It does nothing to establish that the car you are referring to is a getaway car. That's what I meant when I said you are asserting what you cannot prove.
40
When the closest witnesses to the event give their testimony, confirmed by the response of trained police officers - not to mention the reaction of crowds of people swarming the grassy knoll to investigate what they heard - it's not a matter of case closed - but "mind closed"... closed to all testimony and all visual evidence that might go contrary to a pre-conceived theory.

Mind closed.

And perhaps "eyes closed"...
Moorman's photo suggests the profile of a sniper from the pergola window, and it warrants further investigation.




You don't need an open mind to see a sniper in the pergola window.

You need a hole in your head.
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10