Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
21
   Trump won a Majority of the LEGAL VOTERS in the USA. This is despite all the  BS: that continues being drumbeat'd by CBS News, NBC News, ABC News, Kimmel, Colbert, etc day-after-day- after-day. There's a reason that FOX NEWS has more viewers than MSNBC and CNN COMBINED. There's a reason that "Gutfeld!" has more viewer's than Cobert, Kimmel, etc with these clowns being on Free TV vs Gutfeld viewers having to pay/$$ to watch him. Some people have a great desire to be liked. Based on the blanket 24/7 air coverage, they think the "views" expressed by MSNBC, CNN, Kimmel, etc is what the majority of the American voting public think. So, they just lazily fall in line behind these Pied Pipers Of  BS:. This is exactly why Trump is POTUS. Everything is relative. Who in their right mind would want Walz only a heartbeat away from becoming POTUS? Trump literally snatches a foreign drug dealing dictator outta bed in the middle of the night, vs Walz watching while rioters burn a Police HQ to the ground. The consistent contrast between Trump and these alleged Dem power brokers is stark. And good riddance to public funded "news". Why should tax $$ go toward Dem Propaganda being broadcast around the world? The $$ allocated there was nothing more than another Dem slush fund. Musk/DOGE had it right. FRAUD is just another weak knee'd way of saying THEFT.     
22
Just bumping this thread, partially for the benefit of newcomers, and partially to remind everyone that lone-gunman theorists clearly have no rational, credible explanation for the evidence that the JFK autopsy brain photos simply cannot be photos of JFK's brain.

We have hard scientific evidence from multiple optical-density (OD) measurements of the JFK autopsy skull x-rays that the x-rays show about 1/3 of the right brain missing. We have Dr. Humes' own admission to JAMA that 2/3 of the right cerebrum was blasted out. We have Dr. Fred Hodges' observation that the skull x-rays show a sizable portion of the right brain to be missing. We know that bits of JFK's brain were blown or fell onto at least 16 surfaces. We know that Jackie Kennedy handed a "large chunk of brain" to Dr. Jenkins in the Parkland ER. We now know that Tom Robinson, one of the morticians at the autopsy, said the amount of tissue missing from JFK's brain equaled the size of a human fist. We have several other accounts of witnesses who said that a substantial amount of brain tissue was missing. Yet, by Vincent Bugliosi's own admission, the brain in the autopsy brain photos has "less than" 1-2 ounces of brain tissue missing.
23
Why are so many Trump supporters tinfoil-hat JFKA conspiracy theorists?

Why do you keep ignoring the fact that 2/3 to 3/4 of the Western world rejects your JFKA lone-gunman theory? Why do you keep ignoring the fact that your lone-gunman theory has approximately the same level of support as some of the 9/11 conspiracy theories? If anyone is wearing "tinfoil hats," it is you guys, not those of us who agree with 2/3 to 3/4 of the Western world.

You reject the conclusions of the last official U.S. Government investigation into the JFK assassination, i.e., the two-year investigation done by House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) from 1977 to 1979. You reject the HSCA's conclusions but accept the Warren Commission's (WC's) conclusions, even though the HSCA did a far more thorough investigation than the WC, and even though we now know that three of the seven WC members did not accept some of the Commission's key claims (whereas only three of the 12 HSCA members dissented from the Select Committee's findings).

Just to refresh your memory: The HSCA concluded that there were two gunmen, that four shots were fired, that one of the shots came from the grassy knoll, that the Odio sisters' account was credible, that Ruby lied about how he entered the police basement to shoot Oswald, that Ruby lied about why he shot Oswald, that someone was moving boxes around in the sixth-floor window shortly after the shooting at a time when Oswald could not have been the one moving the boxes, that Oswald associated with virulent right-wing extremists David Ferrie and Guy Banister, that the first shot was fired at a time when the sixth-floor gunman's view of JFK would have been obstructed by the oak tree on Elm Street, that Howard Brennan's identification of Oswald as the sixth-floor gunman was unreliable (this was a tacit but clear HSCA conclusion), and that two of the shots were fired only 1.66 seconds apart.

Also, we now know that the HSCA staffers who investigated Oswald's activities in Mexico City concluded that someone had impersonated Oswald in Mexico City, and that the Lee Harvey Oswald who called the Soviet Embassy was not the real Oswald.

24
If it’s true, as John Newman asserts in his 2022 book, Uncovering Popov’s Mole, that the Office of Security’s Bruce Solie was a mole, and that he sent future JFK assassin Lee Harvey Oswald to Moscow as an ostensible “dangle” in a (unbeknownst to Oswald) planned-to-fail hunt for “Popov’s U-2 Mole” (Solie) in the wrong part of the CIA, Newman was ironically correct in his 1995 book, Oswald and the CIA, that the reason a 201 file wasn’t opened on Oswald until December 1960, fourteen months after he’d defected, was because he was on a top-secret mission "for the CIA" (the KGB-controlled CIA).

The only problem I have with Newman’s theory is that after CIA officer (and probable mole) George Kisevalter told the CIA in April 1958 that Lt. Col. Popov had told him in Berlin about the U-2 leak, it took Solie eighteen whole months to screen for Oswald, recruit him, teach Russian to him, and send him on his way.

But why would former Marine U-2 radar operator Oswald need to speak Russian, anyway, if all he had to do was toss his passport onto Consul (and probable CIA officer) Richard Snyder’s desk, say he wanted to renounce his citizenship, and mention to him (and to the KGB microphones in the walls) that he planned to commit espionage against the U.S., including “something of special interest”?

A better question is, How do you explain the evidence that Oswald was fluent in Russian before he went to the Soviet Union?

I recommend you read Alaric Rosman's section titled "The Enigma of Oswald and the Russian Language" in the book JFK: Echoes from Elm Street, edited by Mark Bridger and Barry Keane (pp. 318-340). After documenting that Oswald spoke fluent Russian before he went to the Soviet Union, Rosman devotes several pages to refuting Bugliosi's false claim that Oswald's Russian language proficiency was mediocre at best.

Some of the evidence that Rosman presents is discussed in James Norwood's article "Oswald's Proficiency in the Russian Language," available online at https://harveyandlee.net/Russian.html.

I am agnostic about Armstrong's "Harvey and Lee" theory, but the evidence in Norwood's article and in Rosman's segment in JFK: Echoes from Elm Street is compelling.

25
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: U.S. Politics
« Last post by Lance Payette on Yesterday at 12:47:36 PM »
You are trying to reason with someone who thinks the Soviet Union won the Cold War. The nation built on the Marxist-Leninist idea of a command economy, no private property, one party state and a dictatorship of the proletariat was victorious. And the liberal democratic capitalism - that would be us - lost. Even though the Soviet Union no longer exists. The country that won. Poof, vanished. Apparently they faked their collapse and disappearance.

Hell, even Oswald recognized that it was a failure. He told everyone about it. While he was also supposedly a KGB agent or asset. Yes, the same guy who was saying it was a slave state, a failure of true Marxism was also working for them. But he was instructed to say this. His criticism of Marxist-Leninism was really evidence that he supported it. Yes he did.
I will quickly add this: My wife lived in the USSR from her birth in 1954 until it's collapse. She then lived in the Soviet-style republic of Belarus until 2007, when she joined me. She knows just a bit more about the reality than TG. During the Obama and Biden years, she must have said at least 25 times, in these very words, "My God, this is just like the Soviet Union! This is just what they were trying to do." Despite our recognition of his many quirks and failings, she has not said this under either of Trump's administrations. TG's efforts to make Trump the inevitable consequence of a grand, 60-year KGB plot are pure TDS lunacy. Because I know a bit more about TG's circumstances than he thinks I do, I try to tread lightly and with a bit of humor - but his incessant rants and domination of this forum are such that I'm surprised he's humored by the other members and tolerated by Duncan.
26
TG--

That looks like it.

I accept your statement that Moscow disinformation went well beyond simple propaganda.

You're welcome.
27
TG--

That looks like it.

I accept your statement that Moscow disinformation went well beyond simple propaganda.
28
Or his Russian double Alek James Hidell

Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes!
29
Correct, and that missing-everything shot was fired by Lee Harvey Oswald at "Z-124," i.e., about five seconds earlier.

Or his Russian double Alek James Hidell
30
The only problem is Governor Connally heard a shot before Z-223 that missed. Connally was an avid hunter and knew it was a rifle shot.

Correct, and that missing-everything shot was fired by Lee Harvey Oswald at "Z-124," i.e., about five seconds earlier.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10