JFK Assassination Forum

There is zero evidence the car in question was impounded by the DPD. Do you have such evidence? I didn't think so.

JFK Assassination Short Railroad Yard Scenes With Dallas Deputy Sheriff  Roger Dean Craig - 5 Different Speeds

   Thanks for your reluctant acceptance of my observations regarding the above Bogus DPD Motorcycle Cop.
   As the Darnell Film Images become clearer and clearer, it becomes obvious that this is Not DPD Motorcycle Officer Haygood. This is an impostor. This alleged DPD Motorcycle Cop being filmed with Officer Harkness and Buddy Walthers clashes with Officer Haygood's documented 12:35 police radio transmission. What we see above is nothing more than a, "Walking $3 Bill". BOGUS!

So you believe witnesses can accurately say where the limo was when they heard the first shot but can't count to three. Amazing.

Your stating the eyewitnesses heard just two shots and they are supposed to state they heard three?  Good point, that would indicate your proposing “medias influence.”

The three shot scenario conforms perfectly with the Z-film, the consensus of the witnesses in Dealy Plaza, the 3 spent shells in the sniper's nest, and JBC's recollection that he heard a shot before the one which hit him in the back. If you want to believe JBC just imagined he heard an early shot before the one which struck him, that's your privilege. Just don't expect the rest of us to believe that nonsense.

Actually, it doesn't. This is not just a three shot scenario. You have been proposing a three shot scenario with an early missed shot at Z160. You have not provided a single witness to this fantasy shot.

So much for evidence supporting what only you see in the Zapruder Film.

JBC is not twisting and turning and straining to see behind him at that point in time. JBC continues to engage the crowd the same as JFK.

Holland and Meyers understood there was no evidence of a shot. Unless you are thinking a small child running on the side walk and reacting to an imaginary shot that no adult heard is all the evidence you need.

The consensus of the “earwitnesses” was stating there were three shots but that is not what the eyewitnesses stated. The consensus of the eyewitnesses was there was only two shots. The belief that JBC heard an earlier shot is your fantasy. He never stated that. He saw JFK slumped after the first shot. 

There is other three shot narratives, maybe try one of those out and see if it makes more sense. A theory without a single witness to support it is not much of a theory. Ask Andrew maybe he has a spare one he has not used in a while.

There is abundant evidence of JBC being shot in the early Z220s (jacket bulge, arm flip, twisting and doubling over to his right) but you ignore all of that because you prefer to believe in a fantasy.
Do you think witnesses can see bullets in flight? I guess that's no nuttier than some of the other goofy things you have convinced yourself of.
I refuse to keep an open mind about nonsense such as a flat earth or your goofy scenario.


You said the reaction was at Z224. What reaction do you see in Z224. At Z225, JFK's right arm is still moving downward from where it was at Z225. David Von Pein has pointed out that JFK's facial expression seems to be a reaction to being shot and he might be right but the frame when enlarged is too blurry to say conclusively. In any event, there is no visible reaction at Z224 which is what you claimed.
Tell me where JBC said he reacted to the first shot by flipping his arm upward, doubling over and twisting to his right. He said he looked over his right shoulder and when he could not see JFK he started to turn back to the front when he felt the shot strike him in the back. Tell me where you see JBC start turning back to the front post Z230. You have him doing just the opposite. You have him turned around and facing the rear when he was shot in the back, an impossibility for a shot from the rear.

You think JBC's reaction to being shot in the thigh is to calmly turn to his right to see JFK. Then you believe his obvious arm flip and dramatic gyrations at Z226 and immediately after are NOT reactions to being shot through the chest and wrist. These are just examples of the nutty things you have to believe to convince yourself of your nonsensical scenario.
I refuse to keep an open mind to nonsense.

You continue to treat witness accounts as if they are established facts. There is no conclusive evidence as to when Tague was hit. It could have been a first shot ricochet or a fragment from the headshot. We can say with certainty that it did not come from CE399 which is the bullet from the second shot.
You expect us to believe the second shot struck JBC's wrist, ricocheted up over the front seat, over the windshield, and flew all the way down to where Tague was standing and somehow still had enough velocity to strike the curb in front of Tague and cause his facial wound. Should we label this MMFT (Mason's Magic Fragment Theory)?

You also seem to have an arithmetic problem. If the bullet from the second shot hit Tague and the headshot was the third shot, how did the CE399 and up at Parkland. You have also tried to tell us the first bullet imbedded in the upholstery after exiting JFK's throat and striking JBC's thigh and went undetected by the SS and FBI. That's four shots. OMG!!! After 62 years you have uncovered empirical evidence of a fourth shot, a second shooter, and a conspiracy. WTG!!