Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
21
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: The girl in blue
« Last post by John Corbett on Today at 12:17:15 AM »
   "Roar"? This is Not the Ed Forum.

I've never been a member of the Ed Forum so I guess I'll have to take your word for that.
Quote


You will be held accountable around here.

How so?
Quote

Count on it going forward, and choose your words carefully.

Oh, goody
Quote

And Elm St runs downhill. A motorcycle(s) coasting around the corner would "speed up" automatically. Again, think what you are claiming through.

I have thought about it. That's why I know that both limos are going to accelerate (or speed up if you prefer) coming out of that turn. They aren't going to just coast down a 3 degree incline. Since the motorcycle escort's job was to keep pace with the limos, they would have to get on their throttles too and 4 accelerating Harleys are going to create quite a ROAR (I carefully chose that word).
22
   If YOU are going to base your case on the Sprague Image, YOU should have already, ".....investigated the lighter box around Lovelady & Shelley". This is Not the Ed Forum.

Holding up a hoop and hurdle for others to jump through does not sound research make...

The person who lacks here the most is the one who has violated his own so-called standards and failed to show the highlight box was anything other than a highlight box...
23
Says the JFK CTer.  HA HA HA HA.  Even "funnier."  No huge conspiracy would be required.  Fauci funds research in China.  It results in a COVID outbreak.  That coincides with the upcoming election.  Fauci cover his backside.  The Dems conjure up a lot of nonsense like closing down the entire country to blame Trump.  They win the election.

Quote
The Dems conjure up a lot of nonsense like closing down the entire country to blame Trump.  They win the election.

 BS:

"Donald Trump’s social media posts during the COVID-19 pandemic routinely drew severe criticism from public health officials and tech platforms for spreading medical misinformation, downplaying the virus, and stoking xenophobic rhetoric. The backlash became so acute that it fundamentally altered moderation policies, forcing platforms like Twitter and Facebook to aggressively fact-check, label, or completely remove a sitting president's posts for the first time due to concerns over real-world physical harm."

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/27/coronavirus-twitter-trump-286716

Meanwhile - red sates opened too early:

Dr. Anthony Fauci warned in May 2020 that lifting COVID-19 lockdowns before seeing a sustained two-week decline in infections would cause "needless suffering and death". As numerous states reopened and relaxed restrictions, many subsequently experienced surges in viral transmission and rising fatalities during the summer months

Fauci's Reopening Criteria Advised a phased approach based on federal guidelines. Demanded a continuous 14-day downward path in new documented cases or positive tests before easing rules. Required local public health systems to possess robust testing, contact tracing, and isolation capabilities

Outcome of Early Reopenings Several states lifted restrictions or advanced phases without meeting the 14-day decline benchmark. Infection rates climbed sharply in multiple regions (such as the Sunbelt states) during June and July 2020.

Fauci had no control over the states opening too early while a dopey POTUS caused fatalities spreading misinformation and lies across all social media platforms
24

Which is just saying something strongly without really saying anything...


I'm sure if we rose to your bait and investigated the lighter box around Lovelady & Shelley it would just be a simple highlighting box and not change anything...

   If YOU are going to base your case on the Sprague Image, YOU should have already, ".....investigated the lighter box around Lovelady & Shelley". This is Not the Ed Forum.
25
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: The girl in blue
« Last post by Royell Storing on Yesterday at 11:12:54 PM »
Please explain the difference between "speed up" and "accelerate".

   "Roar"? This is Not the Ed Forum. You will be held accountable around here. Count on it going forward, and choose your words carefully. And Elm St runs downhill. A motorcycle(s) coasting around the corner would "speed up" automatically. Again, think what you are claiming through.
26


Which is just saying something strongly without really saying anything...


I'm sure if we rose to your bait and investigated the lighter box around Lovelady & Shelley it would just be a simple highlighting box and not change anything...
27
Rather admitted that his account of what he saw was wrong, that he had given a rushed description. He said he saw the film once - Zapruder projected it onto the back wall of his office - and rushed out with no notes to broadcast what he saw. And it wasn't a copy of the film; it was the original.

Here is Rather in his memoirs: "The lawyer [Sam Passman, Zapruder's lawyer] laid out the ground rules for us: He had set up a projector in a private room. You went in, looked at the film one time, took no notes, came out and gave him your bid. I was already saying to myself, the bid comes second. The first thing I am going to do is look at the film, then knock the hinges off the door getting back to the station and describe what I had just seen. Then, and only then, would we get into the bidding."

And this (from Alexandra Zapruder's book):  For his part, Rather defends his misrepresentation of what was on the film not by acknowledging that it was irresponsible to give an account after having seen it only once, but as follows: “At the risk of sounding too defensive, I challenge anyone to watch for the first time a twenty-two-second film [sic] of devastating impact, run several blocks, then describe what they had seen in its entirety, without notes. Perhaps someone can do so better than I did that day. I only know that I did it as well and as honestly as I could under the conditions."

Of course none of this matters. The same folks will repeat the same groundless claims and then demand their claims be proven wrong. When they are, they will ignore it and then repeat the claim. More than 60 years of this.

     Rather viewed the Zapruder Film on the Monday following the assassination. Rather then immediately began his multiple LIVE TV broadcasts describing what he saw on the Z Film that very same day/Monday.  Richard Stolley purchased the rights to the Z Film the previous Sat. How could Rather possibly be concerned about submitting a possible bid for the Z film, when the rights to the film had already been SOLD 2 days before?
     Also, in "National Nightmare"by Richard B. Trask, it is detailed that when Zapruder initially showed his film that Saturday morning inside his dress shop, the ONLY people that were present for that viewing were Richard Stolley and SS Agents. Trask goes on to detail that Zapruder immediately replayed his film several times. It was during these repeat showings that, "Representatives from AP, UPI, and several magazines, THOU NO TELEVISION PEOPLE, arrived and also viewed the macabre motorcade". Rather did Not view the Zapruder Film on Saturday. His viewing of the Zapruder Film was done on a Monday. He immediately described to the world what he saw on the Zapruder Film that very same Monday.   
28
It's the HUGE conspiracy you would need to pull this off that is so laughable.
"...inflict the maximum amount of pain huh? - let's get Fauci"  :D

"...to dupe trump" - even funnier !

Says the JFK CTer.  HA HA HA HA.  Even "funnier."  No huge conspiracy would be required.  Fauci funds research in China.  It results in a COVID outbreak.  That coincides with the upcoming election.  Fauci cover his backside.  The Dems conjure up a lot of nonsense like closing down the entire country to blame Trump.  They win the election. 
29
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: The girl in blue
« Last post by John Corbett on Yesterday at 10:35:33 PM »
    You described the motorcycles rounding of the corner as the, "ROAR of 4 motorcycles accelerating out of the sharp turn...". Now, you want to describe it as merely a "speed up". And, there is a difference between "4 Motorcycles" and "Any VEHICLE". You wanna go Drama Queen, and you will be held accountable. The Facts are important. So is the verbiage you choose to use.

Please explain the difference between "speed up" and "accelerate".
30
O'Meara wrote:

 "This is the Sprague image below.
Do you notice the light square around the two men?
What do you think that is?"



I think it is a technical lightening feature Kamp inserted to emphasize who was being looked at...It has nothing to do with the photographic quality of the Sprague copy...

I believe the plaid pattern could be replicated in either the original Couch Film or 6th Floor Museum copy of Darnell...

Larsen proved the plaid pattern in Lovelady's shirt in Sprague matched the plaid pattern on his shirt in other photos exactly...Larsen, after I told him that proved the timing of when Frazier said he was talking to Stanton on the steps, then went back and deleted his post on The Education Forum showing that match...This is a prime example of the playing field that currently exists on the JFK internet...

                                              " I THINK it is a technical lightening feature Kamp inserted to emphasize who was being looked at................."

                  If you are going to swear by that Sprague Image, YOU need to KNOW what exactly has been done to the image. Obviously you do Not. This is the problem with you Ed Forum Guys. You "blow off" without knowing what you are talking about.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10