Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
21
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Experiment proves no bullet penetrated the limo windshield
« Last post by Charles Collins on Yesterday at 01:56:21 PM »
Quote from: Michael Capasse on Yesterday at 01:34:40 PM
Cite your source.

Why would any witness be expected to comment in the record on something sitting there but was not asked about?
Most witnesses in Dallas gave depositions to one attorney and stenographer at the U.S. Attorney's Office in the local Post Office Building.

“Assignment: Oswald” by James Hosty, page 193:
On the day of his testimony to the commission (May 1964 if I remember correctly):

In the middle of the room was a long conference table. At the far end was a large executive-type desk, and sitting on it was the windshield from President Kennedy’s limousine. The day before, Stern had shown this windshield to Belmont, Fain, Quigley, and me. We could see pock-marks on the inside of the windshield. Stern explained that forensic experts had determined that the pockmarks were consistent with highspeed bullet fragments hitting it.

22
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Experiment proves no bullet penetrated the limo windshield
« Last post by Michael Capasse on Yesterday at 01:34:40 PM »
Quote from: Charles Collins on Yesterday at 11:44:40 AM
The windshield was placed in the conference room where the Warren Commission held the witness testimonies. Many witnesses saw the windshield. None of the witnesses who wrote of their experience in the Warren Commission’s conference room said there was a hole through the windshield.

Cite your source.

Why would any witness be expected to comment in the record on something sitting there but was not asked about?
Most witnesses in Dallas gave depositions to one attorney and stenographer at the U.S. Attorney's Office in the local Post Office Building. 
23
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Prayer Man Revealed!
« Last post by Fred Litwin on Yesterday at 01:13:31 PM »
24
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Experiment proves no bullet penetrated the limo windshield
« Last post by Charles Collins on Yesterday at 11:44:40 AM »
The windshield was placed in the conference room where the Warren Commission held the witness testimonies. Many witnesses saw the windshield. None of the witnesses who wrote of their experience in the Warren Commission’s conference room said there was a hole through the windshield.
25
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Experiment proves no bullet penetrated the limo windshield
« Last post by Benjamin Cole on Yesterday at 08:14:50 AM »
GD--


Thanks for posting.

The "JFK was shot from the front" narrative has always been squishy.

There are zero witnesses to any gunsels in the front of JFK. Sam Holland's railroad crew was atop the Third Street overpass.

The forensics papers seem written with agendas, on all sides. 

The purported blowout in the rear of JFK's skull, on his right side, should have thrown matter onto motorcyle cops to the limo's right. But matter was thrown to JFK's left.

My take is JFK was shot from behind. The GK? Maybe.

Caveat emptor, and draw your own conclusions....
26
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: The Mafia Did It! Mark Shaw Connects the Dots!
« Last post by Benjamin Cole on Yesterday at 08:09:46 AM »
TG--

Author Mark Shaw (whose work I am reviewing) suggests the RFKA was linked to the JFKA, and Marcello was responsible for both.

I disagree with Shaw's work, but I put it up for others to read.

If thyne eyes offend thee...

Caveat emptor, and draw your won conclusions....

27
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Does Connally's wrist wound disprove the SBT?
« Last post by Tom Graves on Yesterday at 04:58:35 AM »
Quote from: Royell Storing on Yesterday at 01:06:26 AM
"Logical explanations" don't feed the bulldog.  The sudden appearance of the "getaway" car outside of the TSBD proves a conspiracy.

LOL!

Good one!
28
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Does Connally's wrist wound disprove the SBT?
« Last post by Royell Storing on Yesterday at 01:06:26 AM »
Quote from: Tom Graves on January 01, 2026, 11:46:12 PM
Dear Sonderführer Storing,

Unless one believes that oodles and gobs of Deep State bad guys were involved in the planning, the "patsy-ing," the planting of evidence, the shooting, the GETTING AWAY, and the all-important (and evidently ongoing!!!) cover up, an early missed shot and the SBT are the only logical explanations for what the witnesses heard, what the witnesses saw, what the photographers caught on film, what the police found on the 6th floor of the TSBD, the nature of the damage to the limousine, and the nature of the wounds that the doctors at Parkland and Bethesda dealt with.

D'oh

-- Tom

   "Logical Explanations" don't feed the bulldog.  The sudden appearance of the "getaway" car outside of the TSBD Proves a Conspiracy.
29
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Does Connally's wrist wound disprove the SBT?
« Last post by Tom Graves on January 01, 2026, 11:46:12 PM »
Quote from: Royell Storing on January 01, 2026, 11:33:21 PM
  You got it BACKWARD. An alleged "early missed shot" has to be PROVEN. This is why the SBT is a THEORY. Neither has been PROVEN.

Dear Sonderführer Storing,

Unless one believes that oodles and gobs of Deep State bad guys were involved in the planning, the "patsy-ing," the planting of evidence, the shooting, the GETTING AWAY, the altering of every single photo and film, and the all-important (and evidently ongoing!!!) cover up, an early missed shot and the SBT are the only logical explanations for what the witnesses heard, what the witnesses saw, what the photographers caught on film, what the police found on the 6th floor of the TSBD, the nature of the damage to the limousine, and the nature of the wounds that the doctors at Parkland and Bethesda dealt with.

D'oh

-- Tom
30
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Zapruder disproves Brugionis 2-3 frame headshot claim
« Last post by Royell Storing on January 01, 2026, 11:39:34 PM »
Quote from: Louis Earl on January 01, 2026, 07:59:23 PM
Nice red herring.  Have you seen the Zapruder film?  It shows the 2 cars almost touching when they came down Elm.   What does their spacing at the underpass have to do with it?

   The "spacing" has to do with: (1) Missing Time, (2) JFK Limo "rolling stop" or a flat-out "stop", and (3) there being even more missing from the Z Film than the JFK Limo turning onto Elm St.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10