Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
21
Dear Sonderführer Storing,

Miguel Casas Saez and Gilberto Policarpo Lopez?

-- Tom

   Specifically, who are the 2 names you mention above?
22
A few posts ago I tried to get this thread back on track.
I'll try again.
Why not have a grown up discussion about the points I'm raising?

This is the 'Lovelady' image Bart Kamp produced from a large print obtained for him from the collection of Richard Sprague.



This image seems to include an incredible amount of detail, particularly on the shirt of 'Lovelady'.
However, the print from which Kamp got this 'Lovelady' image is of such poor quality that is very hard to understand how this amount of detail could be present when far superior pictures show no such detail.
Kamp alludes to this contradiction in his description of how he came across the Sprague print:

"This...Scan of a Couch film still at first looks very harsh and doesn’t overall have much information, but it does happen to show a lot regarding our illustrious duo. This print comes from the Richard E. Sprague Collection from the National Archives."

How can it be that the Sprague print "doesn't overall have much information", yet the part of it showing Lovelady's shirt does?

This is a copy of the Sprague print that Kamp used to get his image of Lovelady from:



Look at the poor quality of this image in general. How washed out it is and how there is a lack of fine detail. As Kamp points out, there is not much overall information in this print, as it is of such poor quality.
In contrast, here is an image from the Couch footage taken from "Four Days In November":



Look at how superior this image is in quality, look at how much more detail is present in this image, how much more information is present overall.
One would have thought that the more detailed picture of 'Lovelady' would come from this superior image.
BUT THIS IS NOT THE CASE.
The picture of 'Lovelady' that has the very fine detail (of the distinctive check pattern of his shirt) comes from the inferior image.
How can that be?

This is a crop of 'Lovelady' from the Sprague print and 4 Days.



How was Kamp able to obtain such fine detail from the inferior Sprague print when no such detail is present in the far superior copy from 4 Days?

    Who are these 2 guys that we are seeing 20 seconds after the kill shot? And why are they headed toward the RR Yard only 20 seconds after the kill shot? ...............  STAY TUNED  .................................................
23
Dear Sonderführer Storing,

It sounds to me as though your dream job back in the early 1940s would have been Gas Chamber Operator, and that you'd enjoy it so much, you'd volunteer to work for free.

Am I right?

-- Tom

https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/09/us/ice-shooting-minneapolis-renee-good-cell-phone-invs

  Guess you missed me in, "The Shawshank Redemption". I was that guard that almost threw Timmy Robbins off the roof of the prison.
24
Dear Sonderführer Storing,

I said, "'hungover' or not."

Perhaps you missed that part.

-- Tom

   Did NOT miss anything you posted. You raised the issue of the SS possibly being hung over to the point of Not being able to look back/up at the 6th Floor sniper's nest. That's ALL You. If you now want to run away from that, just say so.
25
Good posts Lance. The answer as to the number of shots plays a huge role in understanding the assassination.

You are absolutely right about the early missed shot being nothing more than a bunch of made-up crap trying to prop up a three-shot scenario. ABC Television supported that made up nonsense of Max Holland’s with a one-hour special, absolutely unbelievable. ABC should have fired everyone involved. The whole theory is totally lacking any evidence and relies on sketchy photos and suspect body movement interpretations. The amazing thing is that it completely ignores all of the witness statements. 100% of the eyewitness's state JFK reacted to the first shot, but they never let that fact get in the way of their BS storyline. Apparently, it is much better to interpret the actions of a child. As if she is aware of a shot that no one else can hear. 

The final nail in the coffin of how many shots there were fired was supplied by Josiah Thompson’s observation, as noted in his book Six Seconds In Dallas, about the indentation occurring on the sides of all of the shells except CE 543. The FBI analysis of the shells states that the indentation is from the chamber of the rifle. No indentation on the side of CE 543 proves CE 543 was never fired in the rifle. The CE 141 cartridge only had to be present in the heat expanded chamber to produce an indention on the side of the cartridge.

Pat Speer did an excellent job of compiling witness statements. Below is a list of witnesses and some of Pat’s analysis of their statements from Pat’s site. One thing to remember is that a number of the two shot witnesses would change their stories and add a shot. A number of the first statement were made to the press not a government agency.

A number of the witnesses are the second shot was the headshot followed by another shot (Marilyn Willis for one example), or a second and third shot with no time element between them or words to that effect. I believe SA Hickey is a good example of a changing statement as was SA Bennett. On the plane back to Washington there was an argument between the passengers as to the number of shots having been fired, according to Newsweek's Charles Roberts. Roberts and Merriman Smith were the only news people that were on the flight.

 

Two shot witnesses

Jackie, Nelly, Bill Newman, Gayle Newman, John Chism, Faye Chism, Jean Newman, Charles Brehm, Clint Hill, DPD Chaney, DPD Hargis, Sheriff Decker, Garland Slack, James Altgens, Malcolm Summers, Charles Roberts, BR Williams, Howard Brennan, SA Greer, A Zapruder, Marilyn Sitzman, Charles Hester, Beatrice Hester, SA Glenn Bennet, Ann Donaldson, Peggy Burney, Dolores Kounas, Dave Powers, Kenneth O’Donnell, SA Landis,  Ernest Brandt, James Powell, James Darnell, Hugh Betzner, Seth Kantor, Lupe Whitaker, F Lee Mudd, Ernest Brandt, Milton Wright, James Perry, JW foster, Clemon Johnson, Jack Franzen, Mrs Jack Franzen, Jeff Franzen, Ann Ruth Moore, Mary Hall, Toni Glover

Second shot was the headshot

James Jarmin, Harold Norman, SA Kellerman, Marilyn Willis, SA Kinney, SA Hickey, Mary Woodward, John Templin, Gov Connally, Mary Moorman, SA Emory Roberts, Hugh Aynesworth, Ruby Henderson, DPD Douglas Jackson, Jerry Kivett, Cliff Carter, Thomas Johns, June Dishong, Aurelia Alonzo, Margaret Brown, Georgia Ruth Hendrix

James Altgens was a two shot witness who stated the one thing he could guarantee was there was no shot after the headshot. Altgens was within 20 to 30 feet of the car.

James Altgens  " ......There was not another shot fired after the President was struck in the head. That was the last shot--that much I will say with a great degree of certainty."
26
"I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody, and I wouldn't lose any voters, OK? It's, like, incredible".
27
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: U.S. Politics
« Last post by Tom Graves on Yesterday at 03:36:44 PM »
The recently released Cop Cam shows the officer being directly in front of the oncoming car and then being hit. This is why the Fake News'ers have suddenly gone Silent with their "murder" claim. Joe 6 Pack's know when an officer(s) tells you to, "get out of the car", you GET OUT OF THE CAR. Parents drum this into us when we get a Learner's Permit. The Minn Gov and Mayor are hanging out to dry with their calling this cop a murderer immediately after the shooting. I am not even gonna get into the 2 women being members of a group of "agitators". The Fake News tried to make this another Floyd, but it immediately fell flat as the Truth came out. This is the kinda stuff that helps the GOP in the midterms. The Billion $$ THEFT in Minn and Calif with its' "bullet train to Nowhere" is more of the same. Musk/DOGE had it right from the get-go. And simultaniously there is also the 2 Gang Bangers that got shot up in Portland. This stuff is like gangland Chicago back during the Al Capone days. Joe Biden and his "10% for the Big Guy" has infested the USA with vermin.

Dear Sonderführer Storing,

Your using the word "vermin" makes me think your dream job back in the early 1940s would have been Gas Chamber Operator and you would have enjoyed doing it so much that you would have volunteered to work for free. Am I right?

-- Tom

https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/09/us/ice-shooting-minneapolis-renee-good-cell-phone-invs
28
Oh, dear, now we're getting desperate.

Dear FPL,

The "oh dear" from you I can understand, but I never realized that you were schizophrenic, too.

Thoughts and prayers.

-- Tom

29
SS Agents being unable to, "...look up at Oswald's sixth-floor Sniper's Nest window" ...because they were, "hung over"? 

Dear Sonderführer Storing,

I said, "'hungover' or not."

Perhaps you missed that part.

-- Tom

30
Alas, no we do not see a disconnect. I was playing on your turf, as we retired former lawyers are inclined to do when we are confident of our client's position. Many the happy motion for summary judgment have I filed that began "Assuming arguendo, for purposes of this motion only, that what the plaintiff claims is in fact true, we are nevertheless entitled to summary judgment because ... blah, blah, blah." My point was simply that since Oswald was in fact a former Marine sharpshooter, why would he not have recognized what your ChatGPT friends deem the obvious difficulty of the shot and why would he have taken it despite the obvious difficulty and greater risks of being seen, blah, blah, blah?

Dear Lance "The Gaslighting Human Pivot" Payette,

Are Marines trained during boot camp how to shoot a bolt-action short-rifle with-or-without a 4X scope at someone who's riding in a car that's accelerating diagonally away from them and at a sharp downward angle from their six-floor window?

-- Tom

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10