What new evidence? The arguments being made today are the same ones I saw 35 years ago when I first started discussing the JFKA online. I occasionally see new arguments made, but no new evidence. Just a whole lot of nothing burgers.

Instead of engaging in debate....

https://www.deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/showthread.php?tid=15982&pid=125273#pid125273
01-09-2019, 09:51 PM
Jim DiEugenio Wrote:
Tom, I like you personally and I think you usually do good work and I defended you when people were attacking your approach at EF

But I am at a loss to explain how you fell for Carpenter. This is a guy who writes for Max Holland....

I only presented what author Carpenter claimed he found in the Clay Shaw archive because I was attempting to verify that my discovery, uninfluenced by Carpenter in any way, was actually original research. 

My inquiry began when I noticed in the Garrison Files that attorney Monte Lemann had been approached by someone in CIA leadership to sign off on
the hiring of William P. Burke as the first head of the new NOLA CIA Domestic Contacts office.

Lemann's son, Stephen, was accused by Garrison of being the CIA paymaster in New Orleans. Mary Ferrell's file card on Stphen B Lemann described him
as head of the NOLA CIA Domestic Contacts office.

Monte Lemann's other son, Thomas Lemann, happened to be the father of Nicholas Lemann.
.
In 1947 recently widowed Monte Lemann had married Mildred Crumb Lyons.

Monte's new bride in 1947 had the same name as her daughter, Mildred Lyons.
So, Monte's second wife, Mildred, was the mother of Mildred Lyons Baldwin, mother-in-law of David Baldwin, stepmother of
Stephen and Thomas Lemann, and the step-grandmother of Thomas's son, Nicholas Lemann.

-snip-
PLEASE BEAR IN MIND THAT THE FACTS I'VE PRESENTED IN THIS THREAD SUPPORT TOM PURVIS'S OPINION GARRISON, TOM BETHELL, HIS FRIEND NICHOLAS LEMANN, HIS UNCLE, STEPHEN B. LEMANN, AND "THE CIA PEOPLE" AUTHOR JOAN MELLEN DESCRIBED TO REX BRADFORD IN A 2006 INTERVIEW, WERE ALL ON THE SAME SIDE, the smokescreen side.
-snip-

https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/Unredacted_-_Episode_1_-_Transcript.html
Episode_1_-_Transcript.html
Unredacted Episode 1: Transcript of Interview with Joan Mellen Joan Mellen is the author of A Farewell to Justice: Jim Garrison, JFK's Assassination, and the Case That Should Have Changed History. This interview was conducted on 22 Feb 2006.
.......JOAN: when Baldwin was present, he was a CIA asset, his brother worked for the International Trade Mart and Clay Shaw, David Baldwin, and these, these are CIA people. Malcolm O'Hara is sitting there he doesn't know what hit him and eventually Strate did not cooperate, and he went up there, and he attacked Sheridan of course, Sheridan had immunity nothing anyone could say about Sheridan whether in court, affidavits signed against Sheridan, Sheridan had immunity as a National Security Agency asset, cleared for FBI work, cleared for CIA work, working for the Department of Justice -…....

LOL.  You start a silly topic on ghosts by writing a book and then insult the only two posters who respond.  Your posts are so long you should write a book on the topic.  You must really enjoy hearing yourself talk.  I won't make the mistake again.

1. 584 words is a "book" in your world? Alas, I suspect it is.
2. "Ghosts" is in the title of the forum Duncan started. If it's a "silly topic," perhaps take that up with Duncan.
3. You responded with two dismissive posts, the substance of which was addressed in my first post - which you clearly didn't read.
4. Across the board, you appear to have the intellectual curiosity of a fence post. You know it all without really knowing anything.

Good point, danny BOY o'meara!

Some of them had started consciously reacting to THAT one as early as Z-145 or so (as had Rosemary Ellis and most of the passengers in the limo).

Made up sh£t backed up by nothing.
Similar to every post you've made on this forum.
The agents reported reacting immediately to the sound of a shot.
Aren't you embarrassed by what a loser you have become regarding JFKA research?

Nutters like Lance are non-conspiracy theorists [NCTs]
Like all true Nutters, he believes that Oswald shooting JFK is a FACT.
IT IS NOT.
It is just another theory.
He cannot accept this even though he pretends that he does.
Lance belongs to the Lunatic Fringe of Nutters. Tinfoil Nutters. Just like John Corbett and "Richard Smith"
Then there are LNers like Charles Collins and John Mytton.
Honest researchers who have worked their way to their own conclusions.
Not like the spoon-fed losers who have recently emerged on this forum.

Just to expand on the incessant nonsense losers like Comrade Pinko Graves endlessly spew.
While they accept that the shots fired were really loud, they somehow convince themselves that none of the SS agents following the limo never heard the first shot.
Even though they report exactly that they did!!

What kind of know-nothing loser can't see the obvious?
Read through this thread and learn something for a change.
Learn something.