JFK Assassination Forum

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10

JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Education Forum Returns to Sanity, and WN Is No Longer a Moderator

« Last post by John Corbett on Yesterday at 03:45:33 PM »

Quote from: Brian Doyle on Yesterday at 03:43:40 PM

I asked Niederhut to open a review on my banning on The Education Forum...He sent me a private e-mail asking me to link my research on Prayer Man...My research was scattered amongst internet postings and not on any formal site...This was discrimination because the elephant in the room is the fact The Education Forum was precisely created for persons like myself to get good research reviewed at a peer level in order to show important evidence...No other Education Forum members were required to produce a body of work and website before their good evidence could be heard...Most Education Forum members do not have such a reference-able body of work...The Education Forum moderators gas-light people and create false demands in order to draw attention away from the fact they are operating in bad faith and keeping correct evidence that validates unfairly banned members from the site...This entire false process is referred to as "The Moderator Team" with zero accountability...

Niederhut then threw me under the bus by going out on the board and announcing that "I had trouble with the moderators"...A sneaky way of making it look like I was some kind of malcontent who caused his own trouble when the truth was I was unfairly ganged up on and falsely banned by the Prayer Man clique and my evidence was ignored...The current moderators and administrators refuse to answer my communications on this...The issue here isn't my failure to produce a website, the issue is getting The Education Forum to practice its own self-definition and allow correct evidence to be posted without gas-lighting and moderator abuse heading it off in order to protect favored members and pet theories...

Nobody cares.

JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Education Forum Returns to Sanity, and WN Is No Longer a Moderator

« Last post by Brian Doyle on Yesterday at 03:43:40 PM »

I asked Niederhut to open a review on my banning on The Education Forum...He sent me a private e-mail asking me to link my research on Prayer Man...My research was scattered amongst internet postings and not on any formal site...This was discrimination because the elephant in the room is the fact The Education Forum was precisely created for persons like myself to get good research reviewed at a peer level in order to show important evidence...No other Education Forum members were required to produce a body of work and website before their good evidence could be heard...Most Education Forum members do not have such a reference-able body of work...The Education Forum moderators gas-light people and create false demands in order to draw attention away from the fact they are operating in bad faith and keeping correct evidence that validates unfairly banned members from the site...This entire false process is referred to as "The Moderator Team" with zero accountability...Instead of correcting this wrong, The Education Forum created a no proxy posting for banned members rule...This dishonest rule was created by the rogue moderator James Gordon to prevent my correct evidence from being posted therefore proving he had wrongfully banned me...The moderation there doesn't give a damn about correct evidence - even though that is supposed to be the purpose of the site...They love grinding people with this corruption...

Niederhut then threw me under the bus by going out on the board and announcing that "I had trouble with the moderators"...A sneaky way of making it look like I was some kind of malcontent who caused his own trouble when the truth was I was unfairly ganged up on and falsely banned by the Prayer Man clique and my evidence was ignored...The current moderators and administrators refuse to answer my communications on this...The issue here isn't my failure to produce a website, the issue is getting The Education Forum to practice its own self-definition and allow correct evidence to be posted without gas-lighting and moderator abuse heading it off in order to protect favored members and pet theories...

JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / How Did Bart Kamp Create The Lovelady Image?

« Last post by Brian Doyle on Yesterday at 03:31:10 PM »

Lovelady & Shelley are shown leaving the steps 20 seconds after the shots right there in front of you in Couch/Darnell...

That is not opinion...It is visible, proven fact...

JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Chronology of the Investigators' Activities

« Last post by Benjamin Cole on Yesterday at 02:45:08 PM »

That is quite a timeline you have put together. Kudos.

JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: How Did Bart Kamp Create The Lovelady Image?

« Last post by Royell Storing on Yesterday at 02:32:21 PM »

Quote from: Brian Doyle on Yesterday at 02:09:41 PM

Rational researchers realize the Couch/Darnell clip shows Lovelady & Shelley were gotten to lie and push their departure time from the front steps back to 3 minutes after the shots in order to screw up Victoria Adams' timing on descending the NW stairs...Couch/Darnell shows the reality and shows that Lovelady & Shelley are on their way up the extension at 25 to 30 seconds after the shots...

Trying to pass your "opinion" off as being a Fact is Not cool on this Forum. Attempting to do so only gives rise to creating more JFK Assassination Urban Legends. You obviously got away with this at the Ed Forum. Your poisoning of This Well is Not going to happen.

JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Education Forum Returns to Sanity, and WN Is No Longer a Moderator

« Last post by John Corbett on Yesterday at 02:19:35 PM »

Quote from: Michael T. Griffith on August 01, 2026, 02:25:05 PM

No, I simply choose not to waste more time posting additional replies to people who've made it clear they have no intention of being credible and accurate in dealing with evidence that refutes their theory. I've provided evidence to back up my argument, and you guys just refuse to acknowledge it but issue all kinds of vacuous denials and evasions.

Wrong. We refuse to accept your FUBAR analysis of the evidence.

Quote

This is the kind of nonsense I'm talking about. The SBT was disproved long before Fetzer came along. And, Weldon, Mantik, Schaeffer, Horne, etc., broke with Fetzer years ago, after he started peddling the 9/11 Truther craziness.

A perfect example of your FUBAR analysis. You also have a fondness for citing other people as kooky as your are.

Quote

In addition, the eight witnesses in three different locations who said they saw a bullet hole in the windshield have nothing to do with any "Fetzerite buddies."

The Secret Service who were able to closely examine the windshield the night of the assassination determined the windshield had been hit by a missile (fragment}
and had not passed through the windshield.

Quote

And you wonder why I don't keep posting replies to your ilk after posting several replies in which I document the very evidence you claim doesn't exist. Does "the MPI large-format version of the Zapruder film" ring a bell? The only answer that any of your ilk gave on this point was Mitch Todd's claim that the apparent windshield damage is really just a "specular highlight."
Quote

The problems is not the evidence. It's your silly interpretation of it that show no capacity for critical thinking. You just parrot stale old CT dogma that has long been refurted.
Quote

It is just comical that you would get on a public board and pretend to have any credibility while in the same breath arguing that the SBT has not been disproven. Ever after the ARRB disclosures about the absolute, visually confirmed no-exit determination at the autopsy, and even after Knott Lab's 2023 SBT trajectory analysis, the most sophisticated and data-intensive analysis ever done, refuted the SBT, you guys still cling to it.

The SBT stands as the only plausible explanation for JFK's non-fatal wounds and all of JBC's wounds, despite futile attempts to invalidate it.

General Discussion And Debate (Any Topic) / A question for Brian Doyle

« Last post by Brian Doyle on Yesterday at 02:11:49 PM »

Mr Graves...

Any reply to my post #15?

JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / How Did Bart Kamp Create The Lovelady Image?

« Last post by Brian Doyle on Yesterday at 02:09:41 PM »

Rational researchers realize the Couch/Darnell clip shows Lovelady & Shelley were gotten to lie and push their departure time from the front steps back to 3 minutes after the shots in order to screw up Victoria Adams' timing on descending the NW stairs...Couch/Darnell shows the reality and shows that Lovelady & Shelley are on their way up the extension at 25 to 30 seconds after the shots...

JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Death by Org Chart

« Last post by Mark A. Oblazney on Yesterday at 05:16:06 AM »

Quote from: Fred Litwin on August 01, 2026, 03:37:20 PM

Death by Org Chart

Paul Bleau's recent article on Assassination Inc. examines the org charts of CIA personnel involved in various operations. From this he is able to deduce the JFK conspiracy. It's incredibly silly and unserious. But that's the current state of JFK assassination research.

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/death-by-org-chart

Thanks Fred. Harvey’s wife’s interview was something to see as well.

JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Ultra-Liberal CTers Are Outraged Over New Book on JFK and Vietnam

« Last post by Benjamin Cole on Yesterday at 02:10:22 AM »

AI version:

Historian Ken Hughes from the Miller Center has used newly unclassified historical evidence and secret White House recordings to reveal President John F. Kennedy's direct, hidden role in the 1963 coup against South Vietnamese President Ngô Đình Diệm.Key

Research Findings

The Green Light: Newly examined audio recordings show that JFK gave U.S. Ambassador Henry Cabot Lodge Jr. a functional "green light" to move forward with replacing Diệm, challenging the long-held myth that Lodge acted entirely on his own.

Outcome: The tapes and documentation indicate that while the Kennedy administration did not explicitly order an execution, Washington officials and JFK were well aware that a military coup could result in the assassination of Diệm and his brother.

Political Motives: Hughes's research highlights that Kennedy’s primary objective in backing a change in leadership was to secure a stable pro-American government and avoid losing Vietnam ahead of the 1964 presidential election.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10