Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
21
I still see people using the misnomer Mannlicher-Carcano to refer to Oswald's Carcano rifle. Carcano is a family of bolt action rifles designed by Italian gunmaker Salvatore Carcano in the late 19th century. Mannlicher refers to the feeding system that used an en bloc clip to load into the fixed magazine.
The following paragraph explains the various names used for these Carcano rifles.

"Although this rifle is often called "Mannlicher−Carcano", especially in American parlance, it was officially the Fucile Modello 1891 (Model 1891 rifle).[5] The "Mannlicher" title came from the en bloc loading clips system, having nothing to do with the action itself, which was a modified Gewehr 88 action (which itself was a combination of the action from the Mauser Model 1871 with the Mannlicher en bloc loading);[6] in Italy the rifle was commonly reported by army and civilian sources as "Carcano−Mannlicher" since the action engineer is usually named before the magazine designer's in Italian nomenclatures (like with Vetterli-Vitali and others)."
22
The predicament for people like me is that there is no neutral ground to dwell on; one either qualifies as a LN or a CT, an objective, open minded approach is very hard to maintain. Yes, I am critical of the Report but also of many of the conspiracy books.

The 'overwhelming evidence' you say convinced you that Oswald assassinated the President hasn't convinced me. At least not completely. The unfortunate fact that the Dallas police allowed the suspect to get lynched prevented a trial, during which many of the questions I have could have been cleared up.--JVDW

---30--

Verily.

Stand your ground. Ignore the contentious types who soon move to ridicule or make derogatory comments in JFKA discussions (LN'ers and CT'ers). 

You are entitled to your observations. Indeed, there is room for reasonable doubt regarding official and various CT accounts of the JFKA. And yes, some CT versions are real laughers, or inspired by ideology or ethnic biases. 

My read on the Z-film is that Gov. JBC was struck ~Z-295, which is less than one second from the strike on JFK at Z-313.

That's a really, really bad read.
Quote

Connally: I was knocked over, just doubled over by the force of the bullet. It went in my back and came out my chest about 2 inches below and the left of my right nipple. The force of the bullet drove my body over almost double and when I looked, immediately I could see I was just drenched with blood. (1 HSCA 42)[/b][/b][/i]

The above happens ~Z-295.
It happened long before Z295. What do you think caused all the gyrations JBC was going through between Z225 and Z295?
Quote

There is the additional curiosity of the entry wound on the dorsal (wristwatch) side on JBC's right wrist---from a bullet that first passed through JBC's chest? His surgeon, Dr. Shaw, thought that was inexplicable. Try touching the face of a wristwatch to your chest. I advise all readers herein to do this.
Shaw was not a forensic medical examiner. Why would you expect him to figure that out?
Quote

Then...we see JBC holding his Stetson hat at Z-272, in his right hand. The WC says he had been shot though the right wrist by a large tumbling slug (the Western Cartridge slug is 1 1/4 inches long)---but that JBC maintained his grip on the hat even after being shot through the wrist.
He held onto his hat after Z295 too. How do you explain that?
Quote

I have reasonable doubts about the above scenario. How can anyone not have doubts?

The WC version also contends, after being shot through the chest, JBC did a 180-degree-turn in his seat to look for JFK.
Is there a specific way a person is supposed to act after being shot through the chest?
Quote

I have reasonable doubts about that too.

In short, there are grounds to suspect two gunsels in the JFKA, given that it appears one gunsel (likely LHO) was armed with the M-C.

One gunsel is supported by evidence. The other gunsel is supported by speculation and imagination.
23
In general, the HSCA was skeptical and reasonable in their JFKA findings.

While the WC/FBI may have leaned on evidence, I think the HSCA mostly played it down the middle.

I accept the HSCA conclusions regarding the dent.

The WC/FBI leaned on evidence to reach its conclusions? What a novel idea. What did the HSCA use. A Ouija Board?
24
AI Overview             

Yes, President Lyndon B. Johnson (LBJ) strongly persuaded Chief Justice Earl Warren to head the commission investigating President John F. Kennedy's assassination by arguing that a thorough, trusted report was necessary to prevent a potential nuclear war with the Soviet Union or Cuba.

LBJ used this fear to overcome Warren's initial reluctance to serve, arguing it was a matter of national security and patriotism.

Key Details of the Conversation:The Fear of War: Newly released White House phone transcripts and accounts from Warren show that LBJ was deeply concerned that wild conspiracy theories or rumors suggesting Soviet or Cuban involvement in the assassination could escalate into a conflict."40 Million Americans":

In a telephone conversation with Senator Richard B. Russell, who was also reluctant to serve, LBJ stated that such a war could "kill 40 million Americans in an hour".

The Pressure on Warren: According to a 1972 interview with Earl Warren, LBJ invited him to the White House and argued that "conditions around the world were so bad at the moment that he thought it might even get us into a war — a nuclear war".

LBJ mentioned to Warren that he had received estimates from Defense Secretary Robert McNamara suggesting 60 million Americans could be killed in a nuclear attack.

The Goal: LBJ wanted to avoid a "three-ring circus" of multiple investigations and ensure that the public believed Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone, thereby mitigating tensions with foreign powers.Earl Warren ultimately agreed to chair the commission, putting his concerns about the separation of powers aside to serve in what he saw as a moment of national crisis.

You're using AI as I source? AI just collects its information from other websites and regurgitates them without vetting them. In another thread I wrote about trying to use AI to support a claim I had made earlier. AI confirmed what I had written. Then I looked a little closer and saw its source was www.jfkassassinationforum.com. IOW, it used my own words to confirm what I had written. Talk about circular logic.
25
In general, the HSCA was skeptical and reasonable in their JFKA findings.

While the WC/FBI may have leaned on evidence, I think the HSCA mostly played it down the middle.

I accept the HSCA conclusions regarding the dent.

Do you agree with its analysis of the Dictabelt sounds or "sounds"?
26
I have tried to find a cross section of the human torso with the hips facing forward and the shoulders turned 90 degrees.  This should give you the general idea:



I ask for an illustration and you give me abstract art.

How about just a basic drawing using simple ovals to represent JBC's head and shoulders. Use a long oval for his shoulders and a short oval for his head and show us how you think his head and shoulders were turned in relation to the path of the bullet. Then we can compare that to Z271 to see if it is even close to JBC's position at that frame. Your last illustrations was only off about 90 degrees for both his head and shoulders.
27
Less than two bullets, were recovered.  There were more than one and a half bullets missing and it was not possible to say whether the pieces recovered were from the same or separate bullets. So parts of two bullets were missing.

There was CE399 which weighed 157.7 grains which is a few grains less than a full bullet. There was CE567, the nose portion of a copper jacket, which weighed 41.5 grains or about 1/4 of a bullet. There was CE569, the base portion of a copper jacket that weighed 20.6 grains, or about 1/8th of a bullet. (6 HSCA 369)

The Firearms Panel of the HSCA tried to see if CE567 and CE569 were from the same bullet but could not find any matching points :



Here is where common sense has to enter the picture. The FBI doesn't speculate on probabilities when forensic evidence is not 100% conclusive. That doesn't stop reasonable people from making such judgements. Do you really think the two large pieces found by the SS in the limo came from anything except the headshot. What else could have caused a full metal jacket bullet to break apart like that?
28
Only because JBC insisted he was hit by the second shot. By process of elimination, they would have concluded JFK was hit by the first and third shots. However, they still would have had to wonder why only two bullets were recovered. They would have had to at least offer possible answers for that. The SS recreations would have revealed that JBC was directly in line with a bullet exiting JBC's throat and that might have been enough for them to develop the SBT which would explain why only two bullets were recovered.
Less than two bullets, were recovered.  There were more than one and a half bullets missing and it was not possible to say whether the pieces recovered were from the same or separate bullets. So parts of two bullets were missing.

There was CE399 which weighed 157.7 grains which is a few grains less than a full bullet. There was CE567, the nose portion of a copper jacket, which weighed 41.5 grains or about 1/4 of a bullet. There was CE569, the base portion of a copper jacket that weighed 20.6 grains, or about 1/8th of a bullet. (6 HSCA 369)

The Firearms Panel of the HSCA tried to see if CE567 and CE569 were from the same bullet but could not find any matching points :

29
In general, the HSCA was skeptical and reasonable in their JFKA findings.

While the WC/FBI may have leaned on evidence, I think the HSCA mostly played it down the middle.

I accept the HSCA conclusions regarding the dent.
30
Why don't you illustrate? Oh, wait. You can't. Never mind.
I have tried to find a cross section of the human torso with the hips facing forward and the shoulders turned 90 degrees.  This should give you the general idea:

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10