Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
21
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: The First Shot
« Last post by John Corbett on Yesterday at 11:45:18 PM »
Does anyone besides Tom Graves and John Corbett believe that 75% witnesses hearing the 1…..2.3 pattern were simply wrong and that the 3 shot pattern was really more like 1…2…….3 and spread out over a longer time like 8-10 seconds?

Mary Woodward has been examined by Lance whom seems to think she’s a dingbat at the least. Since Lance has demonstrated intelligent thought in previous threads , there’s no reason to conclude that he also is a dingbat thus casting doubt on  his judgement of Woodward. ( I could be mistaken though  ;) Others wish to cherry pick which parts of Woodwards statements support their preferred 3 shot theory  similar to how CTs and LNs use the potentially dingbat statements of  Markam and Bledsoe to support or refute Oswald shooting Tippit.

Perhaps at least there  has been agreement among we few old timers still hanging around at the JFK bar that there were 3 shots that were fired from that 6th floor TSBD SE window and no other shots  that came from the front of the limo. (Exception being Jake the Outer Limits CT with the policeman on the overpass theory)  :D

Royell maybe is the Lone Ranger CT still thinking there were 2 gunman and there were 2 other guys driving a car and parking it in the no parking zone right there near the TSBD and then jumping out because ( see Royell threads to explain it)  :D

I thought I had it figured out back in the day but there are too many old timers remembering things that I did not remember ( since the Mandela effect started in 2015 and Reverend Billy Graham had 3 funerals from 2005 to 2018)

This is such a simple case to figure out. All the wounds were cause by shots fired from above an behind the victims. Three spent shells were found at a location above and behind the victims. Two bullets were recovered. Both the recovered bullets and all three shells were fired from a rifle found a short distance from the shells to the exclusion of all other weapons in the world. The owner of the rifle left his fingerprints at the shooting location, his palmprint on the barrel of the rifle, and fibers matching his shirt on the butt plate of the rifle. It doesn't take either Sherlock Holmes or Columbo to figure out who the assassin was. Even Inspector Clouseau could have cracked this case.
22
I don't wish to intrude but would you do me a favor?
When you say "just a couple of seconds before CE-399 wounded both JFK and JBC" can you add "according to Specter's single bullet theory" to the end of those sentences please.
It's just that its confusing to assassination newcomers because in 1988 JBC actually stated "I heard the first shot, I reacted to it and I was in the process of turning around when I was hit with the second shot, it is totally impossible for the first shot that hit Kennedy to hit me in the back"
You see what I mean? It's confusing for newcomers to the assassination.

Yes, it was impossible for the first shot to have hit both men. It is a certainty the second shot (CE399) hit both of them.
23
The two people above that You are labeling "dingbats" were actually Victims.  Please bear this in mind.

It's too bad they contributed to the explosive growth of tinfoil-hat JFK conspiracy theorists like you, Stormtrooper Storing.
24

I didn't delete anything. Whether the moderation team deleted it I'm not sure. I can assure you I've not deleted any of my posts.

   BUMP.
25
You've called two of the most important assassination witnesses dingbats for the sole reason they don't fit into the official or your own personal narrative.
That's how much respect you have for the assassination. Anyone that gets in the way is either a liar or a lunatic.

This is not research, its a witch hunt. A witch hunt for witnesses who don't fall in with the official narrative and a witch hunt for members who don't believe the official narrative. I've made a mistake, I'm in the wrong place for research. Place is just nuts. Deleting my posts, changed my avatar this morning.

Sorry, not for me.

JBC was a dingbat for projecting so much charismatic-politician-confidence that he'd remembered everything correctly.

Nellie was a dingbat for either planting mistaken "facts" in his mind and/or "confirming" his trauma-induced fantasies.

Adios!

They'll probably welcome you at the Ed Forum or on the Luna Committee.
26
Someone has just called the Connally's dingbats. They were victims in an assassination where a man was killed and another had life threatening injuries.
The reason for calling them dingbats is because their testimony didn't fit into his own personal narrative.
Sorry but I can't be here, it's not what I thought it would be, there's no respect for the victims and their families and I can't be among it.
I would like to wish you all well in your research and take care now - all of you.
27
I don't wish to intrude but would you do me a favor?

When you say "just a couple of seconds before CE-399 wounded both JFK and JBC" can you add "according to Specter's single bullet theory" to the end of those sentences please.

It's just that its confusing to assassination newcomers because in 1988 JBC actually stated "I heard the first shot, I reacted to it and I was in the process of turning around when I was hit with the second shot, it is totally impossible for the first shot that hit Kennedy to hit me in the back"

You see what I mean? It's confusing for newcomers to the assassination.

Okay.

" . . . according to Arlen Specter's (correct) Single Bullet Hypothesis."
28
Talk about a couple of dingbats!

The only things Connally got right was his remembering that the first shot sounded as though it was from a high-powered rifle behind him, that he "immediately" (after turning quickly to his left) turned to his right to try to get a glimpse of JFK over his right shoulder, and that he, himself, was hit while he was turning back to his left to try to catch a glimpse of JFK over his left shoulder.

Nellie?

Don't make me laugh.
You've called two of the most important assassination witnesses dingbats for the sole reason they don't fit into the official or your own personal narrative.
That's how much respect you have for the assassination. Anyone that gets in the way is either a liar or a lunatic.
This is not research, its a witch hunt. A witch hunt for witnesses who don't fall in with the official narrative and a witch hunt for members who don't believe the official narrative. I've made a mistake, I'm in the wrong place for research. Place is just nuts. Deleting my posts, changed my avatar this morning.
Sorry not for me.
29
Talk about a couple of dingbats!

The only things Connally got right was his remembering that the first shot sounded as though it was from a high-powered rifle behind him, that he "immediately" (after turning quickly to his left) turned to his right to try to get a glimpse of JFK over his right shoulder, and that he, himself, was hit while he was turning back to his left to try to catch a glimpse of JFK over his left shoulder.

Nellie?

Don't make me laugh.

   The 2 people above that You are labeling "dingbats" were actually Victims.  Please bear this in mind.
30
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: The First Shot
« Last post by Tom Graves on Yesterday at 11:08:00 PM »
Does anyone besides Tom Graves and John Corbett believe that 75% witnesses hearing the 1…..2.3 pattern were simply wrong and that the 3 shot pattern was really more like 1…2…….3 and spread out over a longer time like 8-10 seconds?

Mary Woodward has been examined by Lance, who seems to think she’s a dingbat at the least. Since Lance has demonstrated intelligent thought in previous threads , there’s no reason to conclude that he also is a dingbat thus casting doubt on his judgement of Woodward. (I could be mistaken, though.  ;) Others wish to cherry pick which parts of Woodwards statements support their preferred 3 shot theory similar to how CTs and LNs use the potentially dingbat statements of Markam and Bledsoe to support or refute Oswald shooting Tippit.

Perhaps at least there has been agreement among we few old timers still hanging around at the JFK bar that there were 3 shots that were fired from that 6th floor TSBD SE window and no other shots that came from the front of the limo. (Exception being Jake the Outer Limits CT with the policeman on the overpass theory)  :D

Royell maybe is the Lone Ranger CT still thinking there were 2 gunman and there were 2 other guys driving a car and parking it in the no parking zone right there near the TSBD and then jumping out because (see Royell threads to explain it)  :D

I thought I had it figured out back in the day but there are too many old timers remembering things that I did not remember ( since the Mandela effect started in 2015 and Reverend Billy Graham had 3 funerals from 2005 to 2018)

More like 1..........2..........3
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10