So you are saying Trumbo's right-wing conspiracy to kill Kennedy in 'Executive Action' was not inaccurate?...

"Not inaccurate"? That's a double negative. That implies I thought it was accurate.

Nothing in that movie was accurate except for JFK getting killed. The rest was make believe.

This is not worth answering. These are just more of your inane, unserious, disingenuous arguments.

Translation: MTG has no rebuttal to the points made.

So presuming all the above sources posted by MTG are reasonably accurate , then there is one wound in the JFK back right where we see it in the one autopsy photo ( looks below shoulder line to me) which had no exit and then there is one entrance wound in JFK throat that also had no exit ?

Now I知 certainly open to this possibility  but I知 having trouble figuring out what type  weapons and what type projectiles cause each wound and why none of those projectiles were seen embedded in flesh or documents showing they were removed. And where each of these gunmen were located relative to the JFK limo on Elm st ?

Dissolving darts or small pellets  containing cyanide? Umbrella man and his CIA dart gun umbrella is improbable imo and more likely he and DC man were meant to distract tge SS agents to focus on them. That is IF either or both were conspirators vs simply being protestors)

Many bullets enter bodies without exiting. This is not uncommon.

The back-wound bullet clearly did not come from the sixth-floor window -- it came came at the wrong time and at the wrong angle to have come from that window. The shot may have been a misfire from a lower floor of the Dal-Tex Building (Harold Weisberg identified photographic evidence that suggests a gunman was firing from a lower floor that building), or it may have been a large fragment from the bullet that hit the pavement behind the limo early in the shooting (the small back-of-head bullet fragments could only have come from this bullet).   

The throat-wound missile ranged downward into the chest, as indicated by the damage described by Dr. Perry and Dr. Clark. This projectile may have been a fragment of glass from the bullet that made the hole in the windshield (eight witnesses saw the hole, and one of them -- a police officer -- even stuck a pencil through it).

I recommend reading Dr. David Mantik's extensive analysis of the back wound and the throat wound in his recent book The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy: The Final Analysis.

Imagine that. Two guys who Bowers had never seen before showed up at the time and place a presidential motorcade was passing by. That's a real head scratcher.
The flash of light could easily be caused by the sun reflecting off the chrome or glass of a moving vehicle.
Yeah, a POTUS getting shot would qualify as something out of the ordinary.
You are a very poor judge of what is logical or credible. You were given two possible but mundane reasons why three cars might have entered that parking lot and then left. You have given us no reason to believe those cars had anything to do with a plot to assassinate JFK. As is your custom, you simply assume what you cannot prove.
Keep clinging to your discredited acoustics evidence that flies in the face of the entire body of evidence. It's all you have going for you 62+ years after the fact.
Where would you be without "long-debunked amateurish, unscientific nonsense"?
But no shooter.
But for some strange reason she decided that wasn't worth notifying law enforcement about what she saw.
"She [Mercer] said, "A man was sitting under the wheel of the car and slouched over the wheel." (I defy any student of the English language to explain, from these words, the position the man was in.) ....

"But why presidential assassins...would deliberately draw attention to themselves by parking illegally and blocking traffic on a busy street in the presence of three Dallas police officers as well as lay witnesses like Miss Mercer is not known.

"Of course, conspiracy theorists never let common sense get in the way of their hallucinatory theories." -- Vincent Bugliosi; Pages 883-884 of "Reclaiming History: The Assassination Of President John F. Kennedy"
MTG offers us earwitness and nose-witness accounts of a shooter on the GK but no eyewitnesses and no physical evidence of a shooter on the GK, a shooter who wasn't seen, left no physical evidence, and didn't hit anything. Real compelling stuff.

CTs have been peddling this nonsense for over six decades and where has it gotten them. Are they any closer to identifying someone other than Oswald who was complicit in the assassination? If they can't figure out what happened with what is already known, what reason is there to believe they ever will? Do they think that after all these years, there is going to be some game changing discovery that is going to change the narrative that Oswald was the assassin? The snipe hunt continues without results.

Oliver Stone's movie came out in 1991 and soon after I discovered internet discussion sites and began arguing the case of the JFKA online. Some of the names have changed, but the same stale old arguments keep getting recycled. Old I could crush a Grape ooooh yummy yummy get polished up and presented as if they are new revelations. Nothing has changed and nothing ever will. The only question is whether after all of us are dead and gone whether future generations will still care about any of this nonsense. My guess is they will have more pressing concerns, like how to deal with the massive amount of debt we have saddled them with.

This is not worth answering. These are just more of your inane, unserious, disingenuous arguments.

So presuming all the above sources posted by MTG are reasonably accurate , then there is one wound in the JFK back right where we see it in the one autopsy photo ( looks below shoulder line to me) which had no exit and then there is one entrance wound in JFK throat that also had no exit ?

Now I知 certainly open to this possibility  but I知 having trouble figuring out what type  weapons and what type projectiles cause each wound and why none of those projectiles were seen embedded in flesh or documents showing they were removed. And where each of these gunmen were located relative to the JFK limo on Elm st ?

Dissolving darts or small pellets  containing cyanide? Umbrella man and his CIA dart gun umbrella is improbable imo and more likely he and DC man were meant to distract SS agents to focus on them. That is IF either or both were conspirators vs simply being protestors)