Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
21
Considering where I came from and what I had to overcome ... well, yes, kind of proud. I think that's why I get under the skin of some folks here: I don't hate myself - quite the opposite, in fact. I have no false humilty about the abilities with which I've been blessed. I have no false humility about what I've achieved solely through my own efforts despite pretty long odds. I am by no means arrogant; I am simply content with myself and my life, which drives people like you and Dan crazy. At 76, I have no reason to humor nutcases like you or angry buffoons like Dan. I know nothing about either one of you, but my guess would be that life hasn't turned out the way you'd hoped. If someone wants to deal with me on reasonable and reasonably normal terms, that's what they'll get back from me. If they want to play silly games, they'll get their silly games shoved back up their asses because I'm really, really good at it.

You're at least borderline insane - of this I'm convinced. There is something very, very wrong with Dan; I have no idea what it is, but he's consumed by anger and bile completely out of proportion to whatever is consuming him is worth. You both need help - badly - and a JFKA forum is probably not the place to find it. This place is little more than an outlet for your insanity and anger. I wish you well, but your problems aren't my problems and I assure you I will never again respond to anything either of you says. Rant on, but shove it up your ass as far as I'm concerned.

 I will never again respond to anything either of you says.


 :D :D :D
What did I post but a couple of hours ago - "If my watch is correct it's almost time for you to run away"
Right on cue, the delusional Payette beats his hasty retreat.
And as I have posted every time he disappears - your absence will be sorely unmissed.

The trick with Nutters like Payette, Smith, Corbett etc. is to introduce the most simple facts that undermine their spoon-fed beliefs. And there are so many such facts in this case.
Goodbye Lance.  Walk:



22
Considering where I came from and what I had to overcome ... well, yes, kind of proud. I think that's why I get under the skin of some folks here: I don't hate myself - quite the opposite, in fact. I have no false humility about the abilities with which I've been blessed. I have no false humility about what I've achieved solely through my own efforts despite pretty long odds. I am by no means arrogant; I am simply content with myself and my life, which drives people like you and Dan crazy. At 76, I have no reason to humor nutcases like you or angry buffoons like Dan. I know nothing about either one of you, but my guess would be that life hasn't turned out the way you'd hoped. If someone wants to deal with me on reasonable and reasonably normal terms, that's what they'll get back from me. If they want to play silly games, they'll get their silly games shoved back up their asses because I'm really, really good at it.

You're at least borderline insane - of this I'm convinced. There is something very, very wrong with Dan; I have no idea what it is, but he's consumed by anger and bile completely out of proportion to whatever is consuming him is worth. You both need help - badly - and a JFKA forum is probably not the place to find it. This place is little more than an outlet for your insanity and anger. I wish you well, but your problems aren't my problems and I assure you I will never again respond to anything either of you says. Rant on but shove it up your ass as far as I'm concerned.

Dear MGFPP,

It's sad to see a grown man like you come across as a thirteen-year-old macho genius fancy pants prancer.

-- Tom
23
You must be very proud of yourself, Macho Genius Fancy Pants Rants!
Considering where I came from and what I had to overcome ... well, yes, kind of proud. I think that's why I get under the skin of some folks here: I don't hate myself - quite the opposite, in fact. I have no false humilty about the abilities with which I've been blessed. I have no false humility about what I've achieved solely through my own efforts despite pretty long odds. I am by no means arrogant; I am simply content with myself and my life, which drives people like you and Dan crazy. At 76, I have no reason to humor nutcases like you or angry buffoons like Dan. I know nothing about either one of you, but my guess would be that life hasn't turned out the way you'd hoped. If someone wants to deal with me on reasonable and reasonably normal terms, that's what they'll get back from me. If they want to play silly games, they'll get their silly games shoved back up their asses because I'm really, really good at it.

You're at least borderline insane - of this I'm convinced. There is something very, very wrong with Dan; I have no idea what it is, but he's consumed by anger and bile completely out of proportion to whatever is consuming him is worth. You both need help - badly - and a JFKA forum is probably not the place to find it. This place is little more than an outlet for your insanity and anger. I wish you well, but your problems aren't my problems and I assure you I will never again respond to anything either of you says. Rant on, but shove it up your ass as far as I'm concerned.
24
Your infatuation with Payette is nauseating.

Your mental flatulence is shocking.
25
You must be very proud of yourself, Macho Genius Fancy Pants Rants!

Your infatuation with Payette is nauseating.
26
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: The First Shot
« Last post by Dan O'meara on Today at 12:45:32 AM »
How and why did the evil, evil, bad guys deform it so strangely?

I asked:

"If you have a single scrap of evidence that CE399 was the bullet recovered from Parkland, do share it."

There is no evidence that CE399 was found at Parkland.
The three men involved with the discovery of a bullet at Parkland ALL refused to identify CE399 as that bullet.
O P Wright categorically denied CE399 was the bullet found at Parkland.
CE399 was entered into evidence as the bullet found at Parkland without a single witness identifying it as such.
Tomlinson, the man who discovered the bullet, wasn't asked to identify it during his closed WC interview.

There is not a single scrap of evidence that CE399 was the bullet found at Parkland and lots of evidence demonstrating it wasn't.
Prix like Graves are here to disinform and misinform.
What an unbelievable KGB-loving loser he is.
27
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: The First Shot
« Last post by Tom Graves on Today at 12:32:31 AM »
If you have a single scrap of evidence that CE399 was the bullet recovered from Parkland, do share it.

How and why did the evil, evil, bad guys deform it so strangely?
28
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: The First Shot
« Last post by Dan O'meara on Today at 12:21:47 AM »
This is such a simple case to figure out.

I've got a bad feeling this is Nutter maximum.

Quote
All the wounds were cause by shots fired from above an behind the victims.

OK...3 shots fired from the SN.
I can go for that.

Quote
Three spent shells were found at a location above and behind the victims.

OK, 3 shells found in the SN (I do wish Fritz hadn't manhandled them but...whatever)

Quote
Two bullets were recovered.

Oh dear...massively incorrect.
You were doing so well.
If you have a single scrap of evidence that CE399 was the bullet recovered from Parkland do share it.

Quote
Both the recovered bullets and all three shells were fired from a rifle found a short distance from the shells to the exclusion of all other weapons in the world.

 :D :D :D
How were the shells fired from a rifle to the exclusion of all other weapons in the world??
 ;D How stupid is that sentence.
PS: CE399 wasn't recovered from anywhere. It just magically showed up in the chain of custody when the FBI got involved.

Quote
The owner of the rifle left his fingerprints at the shooting location,

He worked there.

Quote
his palmprint on the barrel of the rifle,

clearly faked evidence

Quote
and fibers matching his shirt on the butt plate of the rifle.

Similar fibres

Quote
It doesn't take either Sherlock Holmes or Columbo to figure out who the assassin was. Even Inspector Clouseau could have cracked this case.

It's a pity at least 3 eye-witnesses described the shooter wearing clothes Oswald didn't own.
That one witness observed a distinctive "bald spot" that Oswald didn't have.
That this spot was only observable when the shooter was looking down the rifle, indicating a left-handed shooter, which Oswald was not.
That the only two witnesses to observe the rifle as it was being used didn't observe a scope.
That the shooter appeared to be a lot older than Oswald.
And lots and lots of other evidence pointing away from Oswald being the shooter.

Yeah, this is a slam dunk of a case.

29
I have a measured IQ in the 99.7th percentile, scored above the 99th percentile of the Law School Admissions Test, [and] graduated magna cum laude from both college and law school. 

You must be very proud of yourself, Macho Genius Fancy Pants Rants!
30
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: The First Shot
« Last post by Tom Graves on Yesterday at 11:55:26 PM »
This is such a simple case to figure out. All the wounds were cause by shots fired from above an behind the victims. Three spent shells were found at a location above and behind the victims. Two bullets were recovered. Both the recovered bullets and all three shells were fired from a rifle found a short distance from the shells to the exclusion of all other weapons in the world. The owner of the rifle left his fingerprints at the shooting location, his palmprint on the barrel of the rifle, and fibers matching his shirt on the butt plate of the rifle. It doesn't take either Sherlock Holmes or Columbo to figure out who the assassin was. Even Inspector Clouseau could have cracked this case.

You're wrong, wrong, wrong!

Don't you realize that oodles and gobs of evil, evil, bad people planted all of that so-called "evidence"?

You WC apologists (or CIA agents?) have been brainwashed by the evil, evil "Deep State," the evil, evil "National Security State," and/or the evil, evil "Executive State"!!!

Wake up, Neo!!!
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10