Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
21
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: That Is Not Officer Haygood = Conspiracy! Prove Me Wrong Challenge
« Last post by Royell Storing on Yesterday at 07:13:12 PM »
Quote from: Steve Barber on Yesterday at 06:50:45 PM
It's Haygood's right hand glove, which he is carrying.

   I Disagree as to that object possibly being a "glove". As you see below, whatever that object might be, it is consistently rigid. It holds its' form as the "One Glove Cop" is in motion toward/down the Elm St Extension. A "glove" would not uniformly maintain its' form while in the hand of a person in motion. From the look of its' consistent shape and size, it looks to me like a flashlight. Like a 60's Boy Scout Flashlight.   
22
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: That Is Not Officer Haygood = Conspiracy! Prove Me Wrong Challenge
« Last post by Steve Barber on Yesterday at 06:50:45 PM »
Quote from: Royell Storing on Yesterday at 03:20:53 PM
    If we could see the entire Darnell Film with the clarity of the above Darnell still frame, a lot of questions would be answered. Like, what is this alleged DPD motorcycle cop NOW holding in his (L) hand? Earlier in the Darnell Film, he has nothing in that (L) hand as he walks along the entire string of train cars. Now, as he advances toward/down the Elm St Extension he suddenly is griping something in his (L) hand. What is he holding in that (L) hand as he slips past Officer Harkness?

 It's Haygood's right hand glove, which he is carrying.
23
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Unwanted Science: Scientific Evidence Against the JFK Autopsy Materials
« Last post by Royell Storing on Yesterday at 06:41:37 PM »
Quote from: John Corbett on Yesterday at 05:15:35 PM
The fact that JFK's brain might be missing or that it was not weighed does not change the fact that it was Oswald who put a bullet through that brain.
Conspiracy theorists regard every anomaly as proof of conspiracy when at most it is proof of incompetence. Yes, the original autopsy team was not experienced in forensic pathology and were a poor choice for the autopsy. Had the assassination followed the same procedures that were used for any other homicide, we would not have had these shortcomings. Jackie should not have been given the choice as to where the autopsy should be performed. The widow of any other gunshot victim would not have been given that choice. An experienced forensic medical examiner from the DC area should have been selected to conduct the autopsy. As it was, Jackie chose Bethesda Naval Hospital and the prosectors were experienced in doing autopsies on people who died of cancer or heart ailments. A different standard is required for victims of homicides because of legal requirements. Unfortunately, we don't get a do over for that mistake and are left to make the best of what we do have. The original photos and x-rays were made available to the HSCA FPP and they unanimously agreed with the fundamental findings of the original autopsy team while recognizing the errors of omission that were made.

      It is no accident when you have 3 unqualified but military controlled Dr's doing an autopsy on an assassinated POTUS. This would Not have been the case if the JFK autopsy had been conducted in Dallas. Cue the "body snatchers".
24
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Unwanted Science: Scientific Evidence Against the JFK Autopsy Materials
« Last post by John Corbett on Yesterday at 05:19:45 PM »
Quote from: Michael T. Griffith on Yesterday at 01:32:28 PM

Here's what Dr. Greg Henkelmann, a radiation oncologist, has said about Dr. Mantik's OD research on the skull x-rays:

Unlike other evidence, optical density data are as “theory free” as possible, as this data deals only with physical measurements. To reject alteration of the JFK skull X-rays is to reject basic physics and radiology. Dr. Mantik has a PhD in physics and has practiced radiation oncology for nearly 40 years; he is thus eminently qualified in both physics and radiology. His unusual background exposes the government-sponsored cover-up that has deceived Americans into believing that Oswald was a “lone wolf.” It is now far past time to be crying wolf. (Introduction in Dr. Mantik's 2022 book JFK Assassination Paradoxes)

If anyone wants to read about Dr. Henkelmann's education and qualifications, here's a brief summary of his credentials:

https://www.womans.org/findadoctor/gregory-c-henkelmann

Explain how being a radiation oncologist qualifies one as an expert in forensic pathology.
25
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Unwanted Science: Scientific Evidence Against the JFK Autopsy Materials
« Last post by John Corbett on Yesterday at 05:15:35 PM »
Quote from: Royell Storing on Yesterday at 02:52:44 PM
      Why let the eggheads complicate the JFK Brain Issue? (1) JFK Brain Missing + (2) JFK brain weight Not documented  = Bogus Autopsy

The fact that JFK's brain might be missing or that it was not weighed does not change the fact that it was Oswald who put a bullet through that brain.
Conspiracy theorists regard every anomaly as proof of conspiracy when at most it is proof of incompetence. Yes, the original autopsy team was not experienced in forensic pathology and were a poor choice for the autopsy. Had the assassination followed the same procedures that were used for any other homicide, we would not have had these shortcomings. Jackie should not have been given the choice as to where the autopsy should be performed. The widow of any other gunshot victim would not have been given that choice. An experienced forensic medical examiner from the DC area should have been selected to conduct the autopsy. As it was, Jackie chose Bethesda Naval Hospital and the prosectors were experienced in doing autopsies on people who died of cancer or heart ailments. A different standard is required for victims of homicides because of legal requirements. Unfortunately, we don't get a do over for that mistake and are left to make the best of what we do have. The original photos and x-rays were made available to the HSCA FPP and they unanimously agreed with the fundamental findings of the original autopsy team while recognizing the errors of omission that were made.
26
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: That Is Not Officer Haygood = Conspiracy! Prove Me Wrong Challenge
« Last post by Royell Storing on Yesterday at 03:20:53 PM »
Quote from: Steve Barber on February 21, 2026, 04:01:23 PM

 I circled a three wheel motorcycle on the right side of a frame from the Darnell film, and the officer with one glove off is walking toward it.  Could it be that Haygood made the transmission he made at 12:35 from the circled 3-wheel motorcycle which he's walking towards? 



    If we could see the entire Darnell Film with the clarity of the above Darnell still frame, a lot of questions would be answered. Like, what is this alleged DPD motorcycle cop NOW holding in his (L) hand? Earlier in the Darnell Film, he has nothing in that (L) hand as he walks along the entire string of train cars. Now, as he advances toward/down the Elm St Extension he suddenly is griping something in his (L) hand. What is he holding in that (L) hand as he slips past Officer Harkness?   
27
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: A Car, A Garden, And A Coupla Guys
« Last post by Royell Storing on Yesterday at 03:08:08 PM »
Quote from: Charles Collins on February 25, 2026, 12:54:35 AM
Thanks very much James. That’s helpful. I think that we are interpreting what we see in the Wiegman film frame differently. I see two different cars in the gap between fedora man and purse lady. In the following image I have drawn yellow arrows, one pointing at the right taillight of the Pontiac and another one pointing at the front right wheel of the Pontiac. Please notice that my interpretation of the Weigman frame has the taillight lined up with the western edge of the opening for the large gates and the front right wheel to the camera right of the post. While your interpretation (image) has the taillight lined up with a point on that surface a few feet further west and the front right wheel to the camera left of the post.






   Bearing in mind that the "getaway" car was 17.5 Feet Long, you're telling me that a 12 Foot long Civil War Canon could also be sitting in this same space and Not be filmed by Wiegman? How about a 6 Man Firing Squad? This is how ridiculous this, "It's there, you just can't see it", claim is.
28
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: What do we see to the left of "Fedora Man on the Island" in the Wiegman clip?
« Last post by Royell Storing on Yesterday at 02:57:56 PM »
Quote from: Royell Storing on February 27, 2026, 08:45:26 PM
  With respect to the Hackrotte "visual aids", they were wrong on: (1) Lego Fedora Man, (2) Lego shadows on the Island, (3) Huge Gates "shadows" revealing them to be open when Euins went by them on the Harkness 3 wheel motorcycle. That is not a good track record. Like I said, "your call".
  You need to be specific. When you say "post", I do not know which specific "post" you are referencing.
  If you don't want to find a good copy of the Towner Film and check out the position of Fedora Man, that's another "your call". Failure to carefully examine that which is in plain sight is exactly why this case remains unsolved after 62+ years.   
   

   Retention and comprehension issues made obvious once again.
29
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Unwanted Science: Scientific Evidence Against the JFK Autopsy Materials
« Last post by Royell Storing on Yesterday at 02:52:44 PM »
      Why let the eggheads complicate the JFK Brain Issue? (1) JFK Brain Missing + (2) JFK brain weight Not documented  = Bogus Autopsy
30
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Unwanted Science: Scientific Evidence Against the JFK Autopsy Materials
« Last post by John Corbett on Yesterday at 02:41:39 PM »
Junk science.

I'll go with the opinion of the qualified members of the HSCA FPP that affirmed the original conclusion that JFK was hit twice from behind, once in the upper back and once in the back of the head. No qualified medical examiner who has looked at the autopsy material has ever disagreed with that finding. I find that far more compelling than the opinions of amateur sleuths who refuse to accept the fact that Oswald fired the shots that killed JFK and that no one has ever presented credible evidence he had even a single accomplice in his crime.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10