Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
21
...and you can pick and choose the ones you like.
 Thumb1: that's what you do.

Yes one can pick and choose which ones they like which is what most conspiracy theories are based on. I choose to let the forensic evidence tell me which ones to like. It gives me a much clearer picture of what happened.

If this were a game of Clue, the winning answer would be Oswald did it with the Carcano from the TSBD.
22
The HSCA saw the file and they realized that Nagell was mentally unstable.

I don't know why people are interested in Nagell. There is nothing there, at all. Even the East
Germans realized he was insane.

All of this is on my blog. I have debunked just about everything Russell wrote about Nagell.

And I have a whole chapter on Nagell in my book, A Heritage of Nonsense.

And you can read the entire STASI file on Nagell on my blog.

fred
23
If I remember correctly, Groden once said that some woman stole all his material. I think her name was Diane or something. Did Groden ever mention this to you as I'm surprised he still has so much stuff if someone once stole all of his material.

It was one of Groden's ex-wives that stole some things. It's hard to tell exactly what she took, but she did take some stuff. It would be nearly impossible to take everything he has. Groden has 4 storage units and a house full of stuff. At one point he owned the house next door to him and used it exclusively for storage, but had to sell the house when he became short on money and had to move everything into his house he lives in.

For example, he has about 4 or 5 big tote boxes of photos he took on the set of "JFK" in 1991. He probably has around 5,000 photos just from the JFK movie.
24
"Who is John Galt?"
I had never heard of him so I googled him. I come to find out he is a character in Atlas Shrugged and the question "Who is John Galt?" was repeated several times during the last part of then novel. That is the extent of my knowledge about John Galt.

How did you become a Libertarian?
25

If every witness is accurate in their recollections of how the shooting happened, then it happened a dozen or more different ways

...and you can pick and choose the ones you like.
 Thumb1: that's what you do.
26
All pretext by you. Disputed and corroborated as false by Phil Willis, Hugh Betzner, Sam Holland and Rosemary Willis.

Who appointed those people as arbiters of truth?

If every witness is accurate in their recollections of how the shooting happened, then it happened a dozen or more different ways. For everything any witness has said, you can find another witness who disputes that. That's why I rely on forensic evidence to tell me what happened. It tells us which witnesses got which parts right.
27
Maybe you should put your jammies on, have your cookie and your glass of milk, and go beddy-bye now, Corbett, so you can dream of John Galt, again.

"Who is John Galt?"
I had never heard of him so I googled him. I come to find out he is a character in Atlas Shrugged and the question "Who is John Galt?" was repeated several times during the last part of then novel. That is the extent of my knowledge about John Galt.
28
I've said UNCORROBORATED witnesses can't be relied upon.
JBC said he turned when he heard the shot. I can see when he turned It was Z164.
JBC disputed the SBT because he had been led to believe JFK was hit by the first shot and he KNEW he had been hit by the second shot. When asked if the single bullet could have occurred on the second shot, he said that's possible.A whole lot of "so-and-say said" arguments with nothing to support that so-and-so accurately remembered exactly what happened when.

How do you know when Rosemary Willis stopped and why? She ran ahead of the limo - how do you know she
wasn't looking back for the car. Her father told Shaw Trial he called her name - How do you know she didn't turn for that ?
She stopped for a shot. - When was the shot? You don't know. Witnesses are often wrong (but only when you want).


I can see when Rosemary Willis stopped. She started to slow down in the late Z160s. It took her about 3 steps to come to a complete stop and as soon as she did, she turned back toward the TSBD. Once again the Z-film shows it is the best witness available to us.
I've never claimed to have proof positive of when the first shot was fired. I have argued the best evidence is it was fired in the 147-148 time frame based on the camera jiggle at Z155. Others may disagree which is fine. Nobody else has definitive proof of when the first shot was fired either. It is all based on how we weigh the clues the Z-film provides us. I can say for fact that there was no shot at Z204 because I know Oswald fired all three shots and he couldn't have fired a shot at Z204 and another at Z219-200. In addition, the tree would have still blocked Oswald's view of JFK at Z204 making it unlikely Oswald would fire a shot then when his target was about to come into the clear in less than half a second.

All pretext by you. Disputed and corroborated as false by Phil Willis, Hugh Betzner, Sam Holland and Rosemary Willis.
29
Once again, you talk out of two sides of your mouth.

There is no sound on any film. You are backing into your a preset conclusion with no basis of fact.
You said witnesses cannot be relied on and are often times wrong. How do you know JBC was correct about when he turned?
He disputed the SBT directly. You cherry pick what you want.

I've said UNCORROBORATED witnesses can't be relied upon.
JBC said he turned when he heard the shot. I can see when he turned It was Z164.
JBC disputed the SBT because he had been led to believe JFK was hit by the first shot and he KNEW he had been hit by the second shot. When asked if the single bullet could have occurred on the second shot, he said that's possible.
Quote

Phil Willis took his number 5 picture when he heard a shot. That was about Z-frame 202.
Hugh Betzner took his number 3 picture and was winding his camera when he heard the same shot.
Sam Holland, was on the bridge. He heard the same shot when JFK reached for his brow. That occurs about Z-204.

Look at Betzner 3 and Willis 5 - see where the car is between two shots. WC didn't. Look at "Black Dog Man" in both pictures.
A human figure taken with 2 different cameras - both oddly without any flesh tone or distinct characteristics. (a black man huh?)
Rosemary told the HSCA: Ms. Willis stated that she was present with her father and a sister in the area of the grass section of the plaza at
the time of the Presidential motorcade on November 22, 1963. The other was a person who was standing just behind the
concrete wall near the triple underpass. "That person appeared to "disappear the next instant."

A whole lot of "so-and-say said" arguments with nothing to support that so-and-so accurately remembered exactly what happened when.

How do you know when Rosemary Willis stopped and why? She ran ahead of the limo - how do you know she
wasn't looking back for the car. Her father told Shaw Trial he called her name - How do you know she didn't turn for that ?
She stopped for a shot. - When was the shot? You don't know. Witnesses are often wrong (but only when you want).
[/quote]

I can see when Rosemary Willis stopped. She started to slow down in the late Z160s. It took her about 3 steps to come to a complete stop and as soon as she did, she turned back toward the TSBD. Once again the Z-film shows it is the best witness available to us.
Quote

 :) Your time line isn't proof of anything
Interesting, she actually stops short right around z- frame 200.

I've never claimed to have proof positive of when the first shot was fired. I have argued the best evidence is it was fired in the 147-148 time frame based on the camera jiggle at Z155. Others may disagree which is fine. Nobody else has definitive proof of when the first shot was fired either. It is all based on how we weigh the clues the Z-film provides us. I can say for fact that there was no shot at Z204 because I know Oswald fired all three shots and he couldn't have fired a shot at Z204 and another at Z219-200. In addition, the tree would have still blocked Oswald's view of JFK at Z204 making it unlikely Oswald would fire a shot then when his target was about to come into the clear in less than half a second.
30
The Z-film alone gives us clues as to when the first shot was fired without using any witnesses. We see JBC turn to look over his right shoulder at Z164. Here's where a CORROBORARED witness can come into play. He said he turned in response to hearing the first shot which he recognized as the sound of a high powered rifle. The film and JBC's statement jibe. Without JBC's statement it would be hard to determine that his turn to look over his right shoulder was a reaction to the first shot. The fact the film and his statement jibe strengthens the probative value of both. In addition we have Rosemary Willis running alongside the limo. She begins to slowdown during the Z160s and when she comes to a stop, she turns and looks back to the TSBD. She later said she did that upon hearing a gunshot. She didn't testify before the WC but was called by the HSCA. None of this is proof positive as to when the first shot was fired but taken as a whole, it is probative of a shot prior to Z164. If we add to that the blurring and frame jump in Z155, it is a strong indication of a shot around Z147-148.

If we don't read the reactions of JBC and Willis as evidence of a gunshot, there is nothing in the Z-film that would tell us when Oswald's missed shot was fired.  That is why the WC never determined which shot missed. They allowed that it could be the first, second, or third shot.

Once again, you talk out of two sides of your mouth.

There is no sound on any film. You are backing into your a preset conclusion with no basis of fact.
You said witnesses cannot be relied on and are often times wrong. How do you know JBC was correct about when he turned?
He disputed the SBT directly. You cherry pick what you want.

Phil Willis took his number 5 picture when he heard a shot. That was about Z-frame 202.
Hugh Betzner took his number 3 picture and was winding his camera when he heard the same shot.
Sam Holland, was on the bridge. He heard the same shot when JFK reached for his brow. That occurs about Z-204.

Look at Betzner 3 and Willis 5 - see where the car is between two pictures. WC wouldn't. Look at "Black Dog Man" in both pictures.
A human figure taken with 2 different cameras - both oddly without any flesh tone or distinct characteristics. (a black man huh?)
Rosemary told the HSCA: Ms. Willis stated that she was present with her father and a sister in the area of the grass section of the plaza at
the time of the Presidential motorcade on November 22, 1963. The other was a person who was standing just behind the
concrete wall near the triple underpass. "That person appeared to "disappear the next instant."


How do you know when Rosemary Willis stopped and why? - She ran ahead of the limo - how do you know she
wasn't looking back for the car. Her father told Shaw Trial he called her name - How do you know she didn't turn for that ?
She stopped for a shot. - When was the shot? You don't know. Witnesses are often wrong (but only when you want).

 :) Your time line isn't proof of anything
Interesting, she actually stops short right around z- frame 200.
 
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10