Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
21
33:50.
Stephen Fagin….. In the chaos that followed the shooting did u see Oswald at all?
I did.  This was a long i don’t know exactly how many minutes later but the lady i was standing next to…. Some of the people Bill Shelly and Billy Lovelady they went down toward the triple underpass because before they went down there a lady come by a woman came by and she was crying she said somebody has shot the president. And so we looked bewildered.  And i turned to Sarah and she said, “Somebody shot the president”.  I said, “I thought that’s what she said”.  She said, “She did say that”.  So we stood there for a few minutes and and i walked down to the first step where Billy was standing down there at the bottom of the steps.  So i looked around and it was just total chaos there.  And then from there i started to go down to see if i could find Bill Shelly and Billy Lovelady.  And it was so much chaos down there. I said, “Well, i better go back to where? Go back to the steps”.  And i did. I walked back to to the bottom of the steps. And then i walked out to the corner of the building right there where Houston comes up beside the building and i was talking to someone. 
It was a lady and i looked to my left and come walking along the side of Texas schoolwork building was Lee Oswald.
Stephen Fagin….. Walking along this side of the building? (pointing).
Yes. Houston St. Yes. Houston Street. So he he’d come around from off the dock there. And so he walks up and i’m talking to this lady.  He didn’t say anything.  And he crosses Houston.  I watch him cross Houston as i was talking to the lady.  He gets over to the other side of Houston and  then he crosses Elm…. and somebody said something to me and i turned and he was about halfway across the street and when i turned back he was gone in the crowd.  I don’t know what happened to him but i didn’t worry too much about that because there was several places around there that you could go and eat a sandwich.  And i remember asking him that morning when he was riding in with me. I says, “Where’s your lunch?”.  He said, “Oh, i’m going to buy it off the truck today”.  I said, “Okay”.  Well, i didn’t think about what he talking about buying off the truck.  He said, “Uh, buy his lunch”.  He said, “I’ll just buy my lunch today”.  And i don’t like to use the word assume, but i thought he was talking about the catering truck.  But…..
Stephen Fagin….. There’s no doubt in your mind that this was Lee Harvey Oswald?”. 
It was.
Stephen Fagin….. Could you see the expression on his face?  Is there anything you can tell us about the way he looked?
There was nothing different about Lee.  The expression on his face was…. he looked perfectly normal.  And that’s the last time that i remember seeing him.
Stephen Fagin….. You then went down to the basement and had your own lunch that day……………
22
[...]

ME: Is the following statement true? "There were 200-plus federal agents in the crowd on Jan. 6, and the Capitol Police at one point mysteriously stood down and allowed the crowd into the Capitol."

GROK: No, the statement is not accurate as phrased. It combines elements of documented facts, exaggerations, and unproven implications into a misleading claim.

Federal Agents in the Crowd

There is no credible evidence of "200-plus federal agents" embedded in the crowd on January 6, 2021, acting as provocateurs or undercover operatives during the initial breach. A December 2024 Justice Department Inspector General (DOJ OIG) report found that the FBI had no undercover employees in the protest crowds or at the Capitol that day.

pbs.org

The same report documented 26 FBI confidential human sources (informants, not agents) in Washington, D.C., in connection with the events. Of these, only three were tasked by the FBI to report on specific domestic terrorism subjects. Four informants (across the group) entered the Capitol, and others entered restricted areas, but none were authorized by the FBI to do so, break the law, or encourage violence. Most of the 26 attended on their own initiative.

congress.gov

Claims of "274 plainclothes FBI agents" in the crowd stem from later clarifications (e.g., by then-FBI Director Kash Patel in 2025), but these refer to agents responding after the riot was declared—primarily for crowd control, pipe bomb investigations, or post-breach support—not pre-placed infiltrators inciting the crowd.

foxnews.com

Broader "federal agents" claims (including from other agencies) lack substantiation for the "200-plus" figure in the sense of orchestrated presence. Official investigations, including the DOJ OIG review, have repeatedly debunked theories of FBI or other federal orchestration of the riot.

Capitol Police "Standing Down"

Capitol Police did not "mysteriously stand down" in an orchestrated or suspicious manner to deliberately allow entry. The response involved documented security failures, poor planning, intelligence shortcomings, and being overwhelmed by the crowd size and violence—not a deliberate stand-down order.

Officers faced a large, surging crowd that breached outer perimeters around 1:00–2:00 p.m. Some videos show officers appearing to step aside, open barriers, or not aggressively resist at certain points (e.g., at specific doors or after initial breaches). In context, this often occurred because officers were outnumbered, exhausted, injured, or following de-escalation amid chaos; some rioters later claimed they believed they had implicit permission.

politifact.com

Internal reviews and Senate reports highlighted leadership failures: inadequate preparation despite warnings, restrictions on less-lethal weapons for some units, delayed requests for National Guard support, and command issues. For example, Capitol Police leadership ordered lockdowns and evacuations as breaches occurred, but resources were stretched thin (including due to pipe bomb distractions).

en.wikipedia.org

A Capitol Police internal watchdog report noted orders limiting aggressive crowd-control tools in some cases, and officers were suspended or investigated afterward. However, this reflects operational breakdowns and hesitation under pressure, not a mysterious conspiracy to invite entry. Multiple investigations (Senate, House, DOJ) described it as a "monumental security failure" due to intelligence lapses and poor coordination, not intentional facilitation.

washingtonpost.com

Videos of officers interacting with the crowd (e.g., waving people in or forming lines that later retreated) have been widely circulated and interpreted in partisan ways, but fact-checks and timelines show no evidence of a pre-planned "stand-down" to enable the breach. The initial breaches involved forced entry, broken windows, assaults on officers, and bear spray/pepper spray use against police.

Overall Context

January 6 involved real security and intelligence failures across agencies (FBI, Capitol Police, Pentagon/D.C. National Guard response delays). Thousands entered the Capitol unlawfully, leading to violence, deaths (including a rioter shot by police and officers who died later), and over 1,000+ prosecutions. Investigations found no evidence of a "fed-surrection" or federal agents orchestrating the event.

The statement overstates unproven elements ("200-plus federal agents" in the crowd as infiltrators) while framing routine chaos and documented lapses as "mysterious" stand-downs. Partial truths about informants present and police inconsistencies exist, but the claim as a whole does not hold up under scrutiny from official reports.

23
TG-

No. AFAIK, not a Deep State action.

Ray Epps is a mysterious guy, and the fact that Mr Buffalo Horns was solicitously ushered around the US Capital was odd. Great photo ops, no? 

The Oath Keepers and Proud Boys were heavily infiltrated by feds.

Evidently, there were 200+feds in the crowd on Jan. 6, and Capitol Police at one point mysteriously stood down, and allowed the crowd into the Capitol. None of that makes sense.

Maybe Jan 6 was just a scrum. Maybe just bad decisions made everywhere.

The Donk-run Jan. 6 committee was a kangaroo court show trial.

I have suspicions about Trump's relations to Putin, but nothing solid.

It should be noted Trump has kneecapped Putin in Cuba, Venezuela and Iran. Even while Putin has exhausted his military in Ukraine, with the US supporting Ukraine through Europe.

With luck, we could see the IRGC and Putin go down this year.

Let's ask Monika Wiesak what to think. She says Michael Jackson's pederasty is not important. Jackson sang songs about social justice.



24
TG--

No doubt, some do.

But James DiEugenio?

Monika Wiesak is a recent migrant from Poland, where there are few, few Jews (Poles are great people, btw). 

Jefferson Morley?

Tucker Carlson?

Michael Piper?

Laurent Guyénot (French anti-Semitic crackpot, published in Unz website).

And the most lurid, pinheaded loser of the bunch, Dr Bill "The Quack" Niederhut?

Unz is Jewish, by birth.

I heard said, "Unz may be ashamed to be Jewish, but we are even more ashamed that he is."

Dear "BC,"

Regardless, do you think January 6 was a Deep State op against Trump?

-- "TG"
25
TG

"burnt-out Army Seargent"

He was seared to a crisp!

Dear "BC",

Perhaps I should have said, "Of no value to the KGB," instead.

This is what Bagley says about Dayle W. Smith (aka ANDREY) in his 2007 book, Spy Wars: Moles, Mysteries, and Deadly Games.

(Have you read it yet? It's free-to-read, you know.)

[Vladislav] Kovshuk did not go to Washington for the cipher-machine mechanic. When Andrey was finally identified and interviewed by the FBI, his account made that clear. Leaving his wife and children in the United States, Andrey had arrived in Moscow in the fall of 1951 to serve as a cipher-machine mechanic. That work involved only repairs to and testing of exterior parts of the machines, like input and output connections. Only visiting specialists did deeper repair and maintenance. Andrey would never see the rotors, the secret parts in a sealed housing, and if they should happen to break down, the cipher clerks themselves would send them to the United States for repair. Whenever Andrey was admitted to the code room, a code room official closely accompanied him — “like a Siamese twin,” as he put it — even to the toilet. In the winter of 1953, some months before his tour of duty was to end, he accepted his good-looking maid’s invitation to visit her little apartment — where hidden KGB cameras recorded their lovemaking. The KGB called him to a meeting on the river embankment, where two operatives showed him photos, one of which had been touched up to be even more ruinous to his marriage. They would give him the photos and negatives, they said. All he had to do in return was “steal the keys to the Embassy codes.” Shocked, he agreed to meet them again, and at this second meeting one of the KGB officers gave him a special paper and flashlight, instructing him to put the paper against the list of rotor settings and shine the flashlight on the paper. But even if he’d been willing, Andrey would never have had an opportunity to do any such thing, so at the next meeting he returned the paper, blank. For months thereafter there were no more meetings. Andrey thought this might have had something to do with Stalin’s death at that time. Then the KGB called him to a last meeting just before his tour ended in the late summer of 1953. He didn’t yet know where he would next be stationed but expected to learn before he left. So, the KGB man told him to write his next assignment on a piece of paper, put it into a crushed empty cigarette package, and drop it into a trash bin at the airport on departure. Presumably under KGB surveillance, he dropped the package, but he had left the paper blank. From then on, in the United States, Andrey lived in fear that the KGB would get back in touch, especially during the first year or so when he worked in the Pentagon War Room sorting and posting clear-text messages from a teletype machine. So, when he was offered a transfer to an army recruiting station in the Washington area, where he would have no access whatever to classified information, he happily accepted. But in his new job, as in the old one, he heard nothing from the KGB — for four years. Then, one evening in October 1957 at an American Legion post, he was called to the phone where a Russian-accented voice reminded him of the Moscow maid and the pictures and proposed a meeting. The KGB must have been tailing him to know he was there, and if they knew that they presumably also knew how insignificant his job was. Andrey remembered the date of the call because it came at an unpropitious moment. Public attention had just been paid to people like himself by the revelation in the press that an American sergeant named Roy Rhodes had confessed to being recruited by the KGB while serving in Moscow. Rhodes, said the papers, would appear as a surprise witness in the forthcoming trial of the Soviet Illegal operative Rudolf Abel. Rhodes’s name was never mentioned publicly before October 1957. Andrey went to the designated restaurant in the Washington suburb of Falls Church, where a short, heavyset Russian met him. He offered to return the compromising pictures but demanded documentary information in return. Andrey agreed and for the next meeting he grabbed a handful of unclassified recruitment pamphlets from his office, the only documents kept there. At this second meeting the short man was accompanied by another Russian, older and more authoritative. Andrey had never seen either of them before these Washington meetings but recognized them from photographs the FBI showed him. The older man was "Komarov”— Vladislav Kovshuk. Kovshuk never spoke during the meeting, merely nodding whenever the other Soviet looked to him for approval. Evidently, they knew Andrey was close to retirement, for the short Soviet asked him to look for a job in a company working on government contracts. But he never heard from them again. Now, seven years later, the FBI came to him armed with — but not disclosing to him — Nosenko’s information. Andrey had retired from the army in late 1961, six months before Nosenko first reported on him. Now, as a civilian, he had no access whatever to classified information. Sacrificing him cost the KGB nothing. Evidently it considered him a worthless source, and the Americans likewise saw him as no security risk. Even before interviewing him, the FBI had determined from army records that Andrey could not have delivered sensitive information, and during hours of questioning they became convinced of his sincerity. The FBI did not charge or arrest him, and army security authorities saw no reason even to question him further. He was left to live out his retirement in peace. Many years later, by then an old man living alone in a trailer camp, Andrey told a visitor that he had been baffled by the KGB’s actions and inaction. "I’ve never stopped thinking about it,” he said, "and I finally decided that I had somehow been used as a pawn. The KGB knew I hadn’t been helpful and decided to give me away to the FBI. But why? Maybe I was used to promote a Soviet agent who came here? I just don’t know. I don’t suppose I ever will know.” It was surely not for this unnecessary and silent one-time appearance to a dormant and useless agent with whom he had had no previous contact that the Moscow section chief had been sent to Washington on ostensibly permanent [i.e., two-year] assignment nine months earlier.

The identification of Edward Ellis Smith as the near-certain target of Kovshuk’s trip posed a vexing question. Smith had left CIA five years before Golitsyn defected [in December 1961] and told the Americans about Kovshuk’s trip. By then he would presumably be of less interest to the KGB. Why then did it go to the trouble as late as [June] 1962, through Nosenko [in Geneva], to throw CIA off his track? We never found out, but one possible answer troubled us. Might [Edward Ellis] Smith have helped the KGB recruit another CIA official — one still active? [Or, as John M. Newman says in his 2022 book, Uncovering Popov's Mole (which he dedicated to Bagley), maybe Edward Ellis Smith -- who had been Pyotr Popov's incompetent and honey-trapped dead drop setter-upper in Moscow -- helped Mole Solie by reconnoitering D.C. movie houses in which Solie could safely meet with Kovshuk.]

-- "TG"
26
TG

"burnt-out Army Seargent"

He was seared to a crisp!
27
TG--

No doubt, some do.

But James DiEugenio?

Monika Wiesak is a recent migrant from Poland, where there are few, few Jews (Poles are great people, btw). 

Jefferson Morley?

Tucker Carlson?

Michael Piper?

Laurent Guyénot (French anti-Semitic crackpot, published in Unz website).

And the most lurid, pinheaded loser of the bunch, Dr Bill "The Quack" Niederhut?

Unz is Jewish, by birth.

I heard said, "Unz may be ashamed to be Jewish, but we are even more ashamed that he is."





28
TG-

I have little doubt Putin and Tehran money is active in JFKA social influencer circles, and funding book projects and the like.

The $links between Putin and Oliver Stone are no secret. 

The Hunt Letter was exposed, and as you accurately point out, elements within the CIA sure look like they were compromised by the KGB, including possibly LHO (says John Newman).

LHO leads to G2-KGB, like links to anyone, were snuffed out by the WC.

Wiesak sure looks like a pen-for-hire.

If only the US would appease dictators globally, then there were be worldwide peace.


Is it just my imagination, or do lots of Angleton-blaming / CIA-blaming tinfoil-hat JFKA conspiracy theorists have . . . gasp . . . Jewish names?
29
TG-

I have little doubt Putin and Tehran money is active in JFKA social influencer circles, and funding book projects and the like.

The $links between Putin and Oliver Stone are no secret. 

The Hunt Letter was exposed, and as you accurately point out, elements within the CIA sure look like they were compromised by the KGB, including possibly LHO (says John Newman).

LHO leads to G2-KGB, like links to anyone, were snuffed out by the WC.

Wiesak sure looks like a pen-for-hire.

If only the US would appease dictators globally, then there were be worldwide peace.

Here is Wiesak pimping for Jackson music sales, a recent post on "X."


30
Monika Wiesak has authored a couple of blah-blah books in the JFKA, echoing the earlier leftist, inaccurate, skewed tome by John Douglass.

I happen to be a JFK fan, and regard him as America's best public speaker in the postwar era. JFK was also an ardent anti-communist, and wanted the world to migrate to Western liberal democratic government, especially the former colonies.

Wiesak "adds" to Douglass' twisted JFK history by suggesting Mossad waxed JFK---that is the hip thing today in certain demented leftist JFKA circles. 


Maybe the KGB* encourages people like Wiesak to blame the JFKA on Mossad, because in so doing they are wittingly or unwittingly framing the CIA's "Israeli Account" holder, James JESUS Angleton, as the evil, evil mastermind, when in fact Angleton was duped by a probable KGB mole by the name of Bruce Leonard Solie (look him up), whom John M. Newman tells us in his 2022 book, Uncovering Popov's Mole, not only "cleared" false defector Yuri Nosenko in October 1968 but very likely sent Lee Harvey Oswald to Moscow in 1959 as an ostensible "dangle" in a planned-to-fail mole hunt in the wrong part of the CIA -- the Soviet Russia Division.

*Today's SVR and FSB
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10