Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
21

The answer to the first question tends to agree with your idea. However, AI asks for more specific information several times and when given enough information the answers change accordingly. That’s part of what makes the lengthy dialogue interesting.
An interesting AI dialogue.  It may be using a military training manual as one of its sources.  When you provided the details there was no doubt expressed about using the ambush wait approach:

“ For this specific scenario, the optimal strategy is to wait and engage the target only after it transitions to moving directly away from your position down the 𝟑∘slope. Attempting to shoot during the initial phase creates severe tracking difficulties and geometric ballistics errors due to the extreme angular velocity right beneath your stand.

Avoid the steep phase. When the target is underneath your elevated position at a 35-degree angle of depression, the slant range distance from you to the target is quite short.”

Oswald knew what he was doing.
22

The answer to the first question tends to agree with your idea. However, AI asks for more specific information several times and when given enough information the answers change accordingly. That’s part of what makes the lengthy dialogue interesting.

CoPilot is my AI app and it's a bit lazy. I can never remember it asking follow up questions and doesn't seem to vet the information it does retrieve. Once it even cited one of my own answers on this forum as a source. It was nice to know that source agreed with the point I was trying to make.
23
The point stands that the line of sight from the Prayer Man position to the limousine is blocked by the west wall of the portal...This is evidence that Prayer Man is Stanton since she said she couldn't see the limousine at the time of the shots...

   Your LOS position is confirmed. The Stanton ID side of this issue? Not so fast!
24
Just asking some genuine questions that, I believe, point to something incredibly suspicious that happened that day.
Shelley and Lovelady lied about their movements in the immediate aftermath of the shooting. This is not difficult to demonstrate.
Why would they do that?
And why would the Warren Commission do everything in it's power to uphold these easily demonstrable lies?
It's supposed to be such a simple story - one lunatic assassin and everyone else innocently going about their business.
The endless lies and deception point to a different story.

   Shelley and Lovelady walking through the TSBD Front door and then back to the 1st Floor Freight Elevator is an extremely interesting possibility. I have never heard anyone else ever pitch that. I hope that you do more threads such as this in the future. Your wide ranging thought process and the evidence used to support it is very uncommon around here.
25

The point stands that the line of sight from the Prayer Man position to the limousine is blocked by the west wall of the portal...This is evidence that Prayer Man is Stanton since she said she couldn't see the limousine at the time of the shots...
26
   DAN - Excellent work above. As always.

Just asking some genuine questions that, I believe, point to something incredibly suspicious that happened that day.
Shelley and Lovelady lied about their movements in the immediate aftermath of the shooting. This is not difficult to demonstrate.
Why would they do that?
And why would the Warren Commission do everything in it's power to uphold these easily demonstrable lies?
It's supposed to be such a simple story - one lunatic assassin and everyone else innocently going about their business.
The endless lies and deception point to a different story.
27
Of course I remember, Pinko.
This is the lie...sorry, fabrication... I'm talking about, so obviously I remember.
I've argued all along that Shelley immediately ran from the steps and met Gloria coming the other way. He states this in his affidavit. (People such as yourself have to ignore the fact that, during his WC testimony, Shelley completely changes his story, stating that he stayed on the steps for at least 3 minutes before Gloria ran up).
The 'fabrication' I have to keep calling you out on is the part where Shelley calls Lovelady to join him. You've invented that. It's your fabrication. It is not based on any testimonial evidence whatsoever. It's a lie you have to tell because you can't find any other way of getting Lovelady and Shelley on to the Elm Street Ext. within 25 seconds.
You have swallowed down Kamp's 'Lovelady' image without question even though it has been demonstrated that this image is dubious, to say the least, and now it's been pointed out that it's physically impossible for Shelley and Lovelady to do what they attested to in their WC testimonies AND be on Elm St within 25 seconds, you've had to invent this lie. If it's any comfort, Lance "I think I've Had An Accident" Payette did exactly the same thing.

On the other hand, my own identification of Lovelady in Darnell does not require me to lie my way through an explanation and makes perfect sense with the known timings:



   DAN - Excellent work above. As always.
28
So many researchers have swallowed down the 'sharpened' image supposedly identifying Shelley and Lovelady on the Elm Street Extension approximately 20-25 seconds after the shooting.
What these researchers reach for is the WC testimonies of these men in which they state they wandered along the extension after the shooting.
However, what these same researchers are willing to ignore in the same testimonies boggles the mind:

Both men state they remained on the steps after the shooting until Gloria Calvery came up to the steps.
Both men testified that it was at least 3 minutes until Gloria came running up.
Both men testified that they only left the steps after listening to Gloria talk about the shooting.
Both men testified that they then moved out to the "little old island" after interacting with Gloria.
Both men testified that it was AFTER they left the steps that they turned around and saw Truly and Baker still outside the building.

The WC testimony of both men is a tissue of easily disprovable lies. Lies disproven by the Darnell/Couch footage. Disproven by the Truly/Baker time trials. Disproven by the testimony of Victoria Adams who saw both men on the first floor approximately 60 seconds after the shooting. Disproven by their own same-day affidavits, which make no mention of this fictitious trip along the extension.
Below is a still from the Darnell footage taken approximately 20 seconds after the shooting. This is the same moment the "fake" Shelley and Lovelady are walking along the extension. It shows the moment Gloria reaches the steps and is telling everyone about the shooting. Lovelady is directly in front of her listening to what she is saying. Shelley is near the bottom of the steps after returning from the "little old island" where he met Gloria running the other way.



It is physically impossible for Shelley and Lovelady to be walking along the extension in the Darnell/Couch footage if they have to wait for Gloria to arrive.

29
My first reaction before reading the in depth analysis is that tracking is the preferred method. The reason I say that is because aiming at a fixed point and firing as the target crosses that fixed point is going to encourage pulling the trigger rather than a steady squeeze of the trigger. I was taught not to force the gun to fire but squeeze and let it fire when the proper trigger pressure is reached. Pulling the trigger tends to cause a shot low and to the right for a right handed shooter.

I'm sure there are highly skilled shooters who can use the other methods, but for most shooters, tracking the target while putting a slow squeeze on the trigger is going to produce the best results.


The answer to the first question tends to agree with your idea. However, AI asks for more specific information several times and when given enough information the answers change accordingly. That’s part of what makes the lengthy dialogue interesting.
30
Au contraire, Mr. Completely Insane Huge Gates Getaway Car Bogus Imposter Haygood Guy, I "peeped" repeatedly. Once the thread reached the 57th time of Blustering Buffoon calling everyone else stupid, pinko, jerkoff, etc., etc., I think most sane people bowed out. I said on another thread that conspiracy theorizing makes strange bedfellows, but you and Blustering Buffoon really do deserve each other. Blustering Buffoon's contributions to this thread never advanced beyond "I know nothing about photographic enhancement, but I don't see how Bart could have done this and I don't think he did" - making my "peeps" rather relevant, it seems to me. These were all after you claimed "And Not a single peep in response! None!" - oh, the shame, Mr. Completely Insane Huge Gates Getaway Car Bogus Imposter Haygood Guy.

I bumped the last one at least twice more.

I "peeped" repeatedly.


This is a lie.
Not once have you made the slightest attempt to answer the questions raised in this thread.
But here's your big chance.
In front of the forum.
And don't bother with your usual disappearing routine.
Answer, or attempt to answer, these two very simple questions:

How did Bart Kamp come up with the extraordinarily detailed picture of 'Lovelady' from a degraded image?
Why can't this detail be recreated from a far superior image?

Rather than your constant lies and bluster, why not actually do what you constantly claim to do.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10