Dr. Evalea Glanges sure seems like a credible witness. Serious medical student, became a doctor. A gun enthusiast. She says she saw a hole in the JFK limo windshield.

Did the Secret Service Agents (especially if they were part of the plot!!!) really let her get that close to the limo?

Dr. Evalea Glanges sure seems like a credible witness. Serious medical student, became a doctor. A gun enthusiast. She says she saw a hole in the JFK limo windshield.

Then, why destroy the original JFK limo windshield? Destroying crime scene evidence is not a good look.

I have reasonable doubts about the nature of cracks or bullet holes in the JFK limo windshield. I cannot fathom destroying the original windshield.

If the sound they heard was the impact of the bullet on the skull, they would not have heard that on the earlier shots. If the sound was the shock wave of the bullet, each bullet had a different trajectory so it is plausible that they could have only heard a distinct double sound for the third shot based on where they were standing. Another plausible explanation is that they heard a double sound for the earlier shots and simply did not remember it. I lean toward the third explanation. Witnesses just aren't very good at perfectly remembering every detail of the things they saw and heard. Out brains are not equipped with DVRs. We tend to remember bits and pieces of events, not the entire event.

The following article explains the auditory issues much better than I can:

https://biologyinsights.com/gunshot-audio-muzzle-blast-shock-waves-and-health-impact/

If, as is suggested by the conscious head movements between Z-140 and Z-150 of everyone inside the limo except Greer, Oswald's first, missing-everything shot was at "Z-124" (half-a-second before Zapruder resumed filming at Z-133), and if he was standing during said shot (as is suggested by the Robert Hughes film), the muzzle of his short-rifle would have been inside the building when he fired it.

If that was the case, it would explain why several witnesses said the first shot sounded muffled compared to the second and the third.

Dear DangerMan Tom:

Why are  you still stuck in the 60’s USA spy vs USSR spy world? Do you really believe that Kruschev would risk assassinating a US President who had just made concessions to the USSR to resolve the Cuban Missile Crisis?A US president who had publicly stated he wanted cooperation with the USSR to explore outer space. A US President that Kruschev said was the best US President they had ever dealt with?

In response to the question Does it really matter who killed JFK, the answer is: YES IT DOES. Because if the Marxist Leftist Kook Oswald did it then we should beware of all the other potential Marxist Leftist Kooks out there who might have a similar obsession with the current US President.

Or, if it was a conspiracy, then why did JFK have to be terminated and who profited and did their organization continue to exist or have they all died.

Dear Rare Gas,

A 1954 true defector, KGB Major Pyotr Deriabin, listed several reasons why Khruschev would have wanted to kill JFK. You can read about them in Mark Riebling's 1994 book, Wedge: The Secret War Between the FBI and the CIA. Deriabin also said that Marina had to be at least a low-level KGB informant to be allowed to marry her Handsome Prince Charming and leave The Worker's Paradise with him.

Some experts think that GRU Lt. Col. Oleg Penkovsky, whom we know due to the "Zepp Incident" was betrayed by a mole in American or British intelligence within two weeks of his April 1961 recruitment by the CIA and MI6, was secretly arrested by the KGB and told to give JFK intel about the missiles in Cuba so that he would withdraw our Jupiter missiles from Italy and Turkey and abandon The Monroe Doctrine.

Why in the world would a Marxist want to kill The Traitorous Orange Turd who's doing such a good job of tearing us apart?

-- Tom

Perhaps someone with access to more resources can determine if a trail of particles lines up...
If a sniper had a choice, however, this is likely the preferred location...

The bridge over the underpass was probably the dumbest place to shoot JFK from. Even dumber than the GK. Not only would he have been out in the open among numerous bystanders, he would have had to shoot through the windshield and had two intervening bodies between him and his target. When people dream this kind of nonsense up, do they ever give any serious thought to their theories? This question almost answers itself.