21
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Acoustic Evidence
« Last post by Steve Barber on Today at 01:02:08 AM »New here. Can someone please direct me to on this forum or explain the apparent contradiction that J. Thompson uses acoustic evidence in his book, The Last Second in Dallas, and the previous work that claims to debunk the Dictabelt recordings. Thanks.
Hello Mr. Sanders.
I hope to try to give you an understanding of Thompson's research for his acoustics chapter within the following. Thompson bases his conclusions of the acoustics on the careless research by Donald Thomas (R.I.P.), whom you no doubt read about in Thompson's book.
I am sure that you're now familiar with a Don Thomas after reading the acoustics chapter in "Last second in Dallas". It is his "analysis" of the acoustics and the 2 channels made by the Dallas police department 11/22/1963, channel 1, the Dictabelt recording and channel 2, the grey audograph disc. Thomas, like everyone, analyzed the recordings after they were transferred onto magnetic tape in 1964 by Dallas police communications supervisor James C. Bowles.
I am attaching a piece that I wrote in 2007-part of what was published in Vincent Bugliosi' Reclaimng History book, and also a revised edition also in 2007, on the Dale Myers website titled "Secrets of a Homicide", regarding Don Thomas' attack on Vince Bugliosi and myself , claiming that we were both "Bamboozled". Nothing could be further from the truth.
I am attaching the link to my article, below. The article will explain why Don Thomas' theory holds no water, based upon a transmission he heard on channel one 3 seconds before the so called first "gunshot" recorded on the Dictabelt, which I mentioned above
I hope this helps you in some way to get a better understanding the conclusions reached by Thompson in his book, and how they are completely wrong regarding the "gunshot evidence".
https://jfkfiles.blogspot.com/2007/07/of-crosstalk-and-bells-rebuttal-to-don.html
Recent Posts