So what? He has no say in the matter.

You seem to have a penchant for protecting the perps....

Why?

I haven't given up on the midterms. I'm old enough to remember 2022 that was supposed to be a red wave. It turned into a red trickle. The same could happen with the Dems. The public is upset about high prices which may or may not continue to November. If it does, there could be a wipeout. If not, the GOP will probably hold the Senate and still have an outside chance to hold the House. Holding the Senate is more important because it will allow Trump to get his appointments confirmed, especially if a SCOTUS seat or two opens up. The voters are pissed at the GOP but that doesn't automatically mean they will turn to the Dems. Their approval rating is only around 20%. What worries me is there is a segment of the GOP base that doesn't show up when he's not on the ballot.

Yes, indeed, the Secretary of State and National Security Advisor, and USAID Administrator, Marco Rubio, is the finest shield from accountability
any fair minded voter could wish for to protect, until His dying day, perhaps the greatest POTUS in US history, our current one!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_National_Security_Advisor
Marco Rubio  Acting since May 1, 2025

https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/marco-rubio-takes-over-usaid-how-it-spent-millions-foreign-lgbtq-programmes-1730715
Marco Rubio Takes Over USAID: How It Spent Millions on Foreign LGBTQ Programmes

I like Rubio too and if he's the GOP nominee for POTUS in 2028, I will gladly vote for him. I think the nomination is J. D. Vance's to lose. A lot can happen between now and the early primaries and caucuses in 2028, but I expect Vance to be the nominee. Rubio would make a great #2.

There are no Democrats who I would even consider voting for in 2028. The Democrat Party has become so toxic with their embracing of the Marxist agenda that I won't consider anybody who is willing to put a D next to their name. I like John Fetterman but he isn't going to be on the national ticket and I live in the neighboring state of Ohio so I can't vote for him anyway. If he is going to remain in the Senate, he will have to switch parties because he will be primaried by the Democrats. Arlen Specter made that move in the oppositive direction. There is one other Democrat I like because he shows some common sense and the courage to call out the far left but I can't imagine him gaining any traction even if he does choose to run. That would be Stephen A. Smith who is a long shot to run and end even longer shot to win the nomination. The Commies are now controlling the primary process in the Democrat Party and not just on the coasts. I hope the Dems nominate AOC. It might be enough to make me believe there is a God.

     Within an extremely confined space, Gov Connally was beginning to "turn around" to his (R). Kinda like sitting in a armless chair, inside a phone booth, and attempting to "turn around" your upper torso in order to face the opposite direction.

And still Royell pretends the arm flip never happened.

Well……. Just couldn’t resist…..te-hee!  The three of us together at last!  Sir Graves Ghastly, Dipsy Doyle, and me, you see!  The only one missing is some dude named raff?  Don’t laugh too hard, Duncan. Don’t want to be banned from here like Tom Scully was from Simple Simkin’s place for speaking truth to the power of the lie.  How many 5 star reviews for Mary’s Mosaic?  Oh nevermind……….. have a good day.  Oh By the way Brian, sorry, it wasn’t a dude with a camera, it was Stanton.  My bad.

 

Mark, did you miss this? This POS has no shame, but that was confirmed when he presented himself as imaginary son of Mary Meyer to achieve standing
in (Orphan) Janney v Mitchell !

Morley, we hardly knew ye!

jfkfacts.substack.com
https://jfkfacts.substack.com/p/murder-on-the-towpath-soledad-obriens-podcast-on-mary-meyer
May 26, 2020
Murder on the Towpath: Soledad O'Brien's Podcast on Mary Meyer
Meyer is one, of course, and the other is Dovey Johnson Roundtree, the trailblazing civil rights attorney who successfully defended Meyer's accused killer and got him acquitted. Source: The Unsolved Murder of JFK's Mistress Mary Pinchot Meyer - Soledad O'Brien Podcast Murder … on the Towpath

https://web.archive.org/web/20200620223217/https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-jfk-mistress-mary-pinchot-meyer-was-gunned-down-in-cold-blood-why/
June, 2020
......It took years for Janney to track down Willam L. Mitchell, who changed his legal name to Bill Mitchell, and to establish that he was working at the Pentagon—perhaps with some connection to special ops—at the time he schlepped all the way over to the towpath to run at lunchtime that Monday in October.
In the first edition of Mary’s Mosaic, Janney speculated that Mitchell might be dead. By the third edition, he had found him and persuaded him to be deposed, but Mitchell said—not altogether implausibly more than 50 years after the fact—that on virtually every key point he could not remember the answers to Janney’s questions.

What would the purpose of that be? Do you think that is going to satisfy the crazies? The findings of the original autopsy didn't satisfy them? The concurrence of the FPP didn't satisfy them? Why would anyone believe another bite of the apple would satisfy them? If the body was reexamined and the same conclusion was reached, the crazies would just cry foul again and invent more excuses not to trust the process.

The FBI agent of the Dallas office, quote in the news article in the OP, at the time of Gov. Connolly's death completely disagrees with you.

How could Hickey have not heard a nearby high-powered rifle shot at either "Z-124" or your beloved Z-148?

I've always heard, "Actions speak louder than words."

Regardless of the fact that he didn't remember doing it, why do you think Hickey started leaning over to look at the pavement in Z-146, even before your beloved jiggle-proved / misinterpreted-JBC-headturn-proved Z-148?

To answer your last question first, I have no idea what Hickey was doing because he never mentioned it in his report. He said he looked to his right rear upon hearing the first shot. I don't know how you tie that to his action of looking down to his left. That seems to be quite a stretch.

As for not hearing the first shot, or at least not recognizing it for what it was, that is not at all hard to understand when you take into account he was being straddled by four motorcycles, two to each side of him, and those motorcycles would be accelerating out of a 110 degree turn in order to keep pace with the limos. All four officers would have been on their throttles which would have created a very loud racket, maybe not enough to completely drown out the sound of the shot but certainly enough to muffle the noise to the point it wouldn't have sounded like a gun shot. If you have a better explanation for why Clint Hill and Jackie only remembered hearing two shots, I'd love to hear it.

Clint Hill's report also indicated the first shot he heard was the one that hit JFK in the back:

"The motorcade made a right hand turn onto Elm Street. I was on the forward portion of the left running board of the follow-up car. The motorcade made a left hand turn from Elm Street toward an underpass. We were traveling about 12 to 15 miles per hour. On the left hand side was a grass area with a few people scattered along it observing the motorcade passing, and I was visually scanning these people when I heard a noise similar to a firecracker. The sound came from my right rear and I immediately moved my head in that direction. In so doing, my eyes had to cross the Presidential automobile and I saw the President hunch forward and then slump to his left. I jumped from the Follow-up car and ran toward the Presidential automobile. I heard a second firecracker type noise but it had a different sound-- like the sound of shooting a revolver into something hard. I saw the President slump more toward his left."

Hill apparently conflated Elm St. with Houston St. in his report. Clint Hill's WC testimony tells much the same story if you want to read it:
https://www.jfk-assassination.net/russ/testimony/hill_c.htm

If Clint Hill didn't hear the first shot, why do you find it hard to believe Hickey didn't either.