Recent Posts
Either a tangential entry or a yawing bullet could produce an elongated entry wound. Since the medical team AT THE TIME would have had no reason to believe the bullet and struck someone or something before entering JBC's back, it is understandable why they would conclude the bullet made a tangential entry wound into JBC's back. That would indicate the bullet was traveling almost parallel to his back.No. The wound showed that the bullet entered on a downward trajectory. It was 1.5 cm in the longest dimension (the bullet is 3.0 cm long) and was drawn as an ellipse with its long axis in the vertical direction:
The problem with that is a bullet entering at that angle would have continued on and exited from the left side of his torso. The other possibility would be if the bullet made a tangential entry going in the opposite direction which would require the shot to have been fired from the south side of Elm St. In any case, the ER doctors were simply wrong in concluding that the elongated wound was caused by a tangential strike. It was caused by a yawing bullet. No other explanation fits the available evidence.You are assuming that the bullet did not deflect. But it must have imparted significant momentum to JBC in order for the bullet to have made such an impact sensation in JBC's back. The only way that happens is if it changes direction suddenly.
TG-
Do you dislike the Donks and the Phants equally?
On any given day...
Lately, with the Mamdani-stan wing of the D-Party becoming ascendant...maybe 60/40 favor for the GOP.
But, in general it is a race to the bottom between these two parties....
I like Marco Rubio.
Here Jeff Morley says the IRGC is not so bad...the real danger is in Riyadh.
How long has Morley been carrying water for the iRGC? Paid or not?
https://newrepublic.com/article/153537/growing-obsession-linking-iran-terrorism
Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump · July 10, 2026, 11:18 PM
1000 Missiles are Locked and Loaded and aimed at the Islamic Republic of Iran, with thousands of more to immediately follow, should the Iranian Government act on its threat, pronounced in many corners of the Globe, to assassinate, or attempt to assassinate, the sitting President of the United States of America, in this case, ME! Orders have already been given, and the U.S. Military is ready, willing, and able, for a one year period of time, subject to extension, to completely decimate and destroy all areas of Iran – PRAISE BE TO ALLAH! President DONALD J. TRUMP
I like Rubio too and if he's the GOP nominee for POTUS in 2028, I will gladly vote for him. I think the nomination is J. D. Vance's to lose. A lot can happen between now and the early primaries and caucuses in 2028, but I expect Vance to be the nominee. Rubio would make a great #2.
There are no Democrats who I would even consider voting for in 2028. The Democrat Party has become so toxic with their embracing of the Marxist agenda that I won't consider anybody who is willing to put a D next to their name. I like John Fetterman but he isn't going to be on the national ticket and I live in the neighboring state of Ohio so I can't vote for him anyway. If he is going to remain in the Senate, he will have to switch parties because he will be primaried by the Democrats. Arlen Specter made that move in the oppositive direction. There is one other Democrat I like because he shows some common sense and the courage to call out the far left but I can't imagine him gaining any traction even if he does choose to run. That would be Stephen A. Smith who is a long shot to run and end even longer shot to win the nomination. The Commies are now controlling the primary process in the Democrat Party and not just on the coasts. I hope the Dems nominate AOC. It might be enough to make me believe there is a God.
https://www.usatoday.com › story › news › politics › 2026 › 01 › 04 › marco-rubio-takes-charge-venezuela › 88008997007
Marco Rubio to 'run' Venezuela with Maduro's inner circle
Jan 4, 2026 As the question of who's in charge of Venezuela looms, Marco Rubio prepares to work with Delcy Rodriguez, sworn in after Maduro's capture.
https://www.bostonherald.com/2026/06/18/us-kills-three-on-boat/
US strike on an alleged drug boat kills 3 in the eastern Pacific Ocean
July 12, 2026
The military did not provide evidence that the vessel was ferrying drugs. At least 211 have been killed in such strikes since September..
https://www.justsecurity.org/137325/us-cuba-embargo-international-law/
April 29, 2026
.....
In this article, we examine the international law dimensions of the U.S. campaign against Cuba. As we will explain, whatever one calls what the United States is doing — blockade, embargo, oil denial campaign — it is not a “blockade” in the sense of the law of naval warfare, for no international armed conflict with Cuba exists. The applicable bodies of law are instead the U.N. Charter’s prohibition on the threat or use of force and the customary international law rule of non-intervention.
Blockade Under the Law of Naval Warfare?Quote
https://www.state.gov/releases/office-of-the-spokesperson/2026/03/secretary-of-state-marco-rubio-remarks-to-press-6/
Secretary of State Marco Rubio Remarks to Press
Mar 2, 2026SECRETARY RUBIO: There absolutely was an imminent threat, and the imminent threat was that we knew that if Iran was attacked - and we believe they would be attacked - that they would immediately come after us, and we were not going to sit there and absorb a blow before we responded...
journals.law.harvard.edu
https://journals.law.harvard.edu/ilj/2017/04/continued-debate-over-the-crime-of-aggression-a-supreme-international-irony/
....
Continued Debate Over the Crime of Aggression: A Supreme International ...
The Charter defined "crimes against peace" as the "planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression, or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances, or participation in a Common Plan or Conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the foregoing."
.....
....At Nuremberg, it was the United States that pressed for including aggressive war-making as an indictable offense.[9] The Charter defined “crimes against peace” as the “planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression, or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances, or participation in a Common Plan or Conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the foregoing.”[10] It went on to specify that “[l]leaders, organizers, instigators and accomplices participating in the formulation or execution of a Common Plan or Conspiracy to commit any of the foregoing crimes are responsible for all acts performed by any persons in execution of such plan.”[11]..
https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/international-crime-and-justice/crime-of-aggression/6F12A1F54C3724553D7E2EF7DCEF68B1
The Crime of Aggression (Chapter 43) - International Crime and Justice
International Crime and Justice - November 2010 The crime of aggression, or crime against peace, has been famously labeled as the "supreme international crime" by Robert H. Jackson, the Chief American Prosecutor at the Nuremberg trials. Of the twenty-two former Nazi leaders tried in Nuremberg, twelve...
Did Bentley say that he engraved his initials on the gun at the same time as Hill, Carroll, Walker, and McDonald? No. You're assuming that all of the officers itnitalled the weapon at the same time, but there's nothing in the record that requires, implies, or suggests that this is the case.
Moving the goalpost again? This is exactly the kind of BS that I have seen coming from you in previous conversations. Hill said he had the revolver all the time, until he handed it over to Lt Baker. Your suggestion that Bentley initialed the revolver before everybody else did is an assumption for which there is no evidence. It also doesn't make any sense!
Oh, but it does. You just won't let the sunshine into your mind. Carrol testified to the same thing:
First you claim that Hill's testimony implied it (which it didn't) and now you come up with Carroll who only believes that Bentley and Lyons had already left and doesn't even recall if Westbrook was there.
Wow, that's some solid "evidence"
The one good thing coming out of this is the fact that there also isn't a solid chain of custody for the wallet, just like there isn't one for the revolver, the gray jacket and CE 399.
Because you kept emphasizing Bentley, so that's what I responded to. Your Bentley angle has crashed and burned, so now you want to change the subject.
Nope.. the question about Rose and Walker was already asked before you joined the conversation. The fact that youdon't understandignored that shows exactly your strategy of talking about anything except the matter I wanted to discuss.
And my Bentley angle hasn't crashed and burned. You haven't even come close to making a coherent argument. All you are doing is cherry picking evidence and throwing it at the wall to see what sticks.
As for the original question, which directly relates to the existence of two wallets, you are still completely lost in the dark.
I said it before and I'll repeat it now; talking to you is a waste of time!
