Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
21
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Yet Another Bullet That the Lone-Gunman Theory Cannot Explain
« Last post by Michael Capasse on Yesterday at 07:42:20 PM »
Quote from: John Corbett on Yesterday at 07:38:55 PM
I've looked at a number of online dictionary definitions of "missile", some of which would apply to a bullet fragment and others which would not. It really isn't important. It is what the person who used the term "missile" meant by it. If that person considered a fragment to be a missile, then it is a missile.

Does nothing to clarify the receipt dated 11/22/63
lame with a bit of mumbo-jumbo on the side

22
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Yet Another Bullet That the Lone-Gunman Theory Cannot Explain
« Last post by John Corbett on Yesterday at 07:38:55 PM »
Quote from: Michael Capasse on Yesterday at 07:29:31 PM
Well then, it should be easy to find clarification in the official documents for such a major discrepancy.
Missile is a bullet, I'm not aware of any reference of other fragments found in this case called "missiles".
Even if "removed" Humes made no further reference to it, The document was hidden until 1972.

Find an official reference that missile means fragment would clarify it as not just another lame excuse

I've looked at a number of online dictionary definitions of "missile", some of which would apply to a bullet fragment and others which would not. It really isn't important. It is what the person who used the term "missile" meant by it. If that person considered a fragment to be a missile, then it is a missile.
23
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: EF-JFKA... Better, but Still Some P.U.
« Last post by John Corbett on Yesterday at 07:30:03 PM »
Quote from: Brian Doyle on Yesterday at 06:48:20 PM
You are offering yourself and your shallow nay-saying as not only on parr with Armstrong but better...

I think any review or your material vs Armstrong's sleuthing shows that for what it is...

Just Armstrong's Westbrook material is near genius work and cracks the case...

Do you believe Westbrook when he says he walked from the Police Station to the Depository?

The case was "cracked" 12 hours after Oswald killed JFK. That's when the DPD formally charged him with JFK's murder. They had already charged him with killing Tippit a few hours earlier.

Everything that has been learned since and all the advances in the forensic sciences has only served to make that case stronger. There is no rational explanation of the JFKA that doesn't have Oswald as the man who fired the shots at JFK and who later killed Tippit.
24
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Yet Another Bullet That the Lone-Gunman Theory Cannot Explain
« Last post by Michael Capasse on Yesterday at 07:29:31 PM »
Quote from: Mitch Todd on Yesterday at 06:50:36 PM
The "major discrepancy" exists only in your own head and nowhere else. "Missile" has a range of meanings, and the fragments exchanged for the receipt falls within that. For that matter, Sibert and O'Neil both talk about the fragments and the receipt exchanged therefore in their ARRB depositions.

Well then, it should be easy to find clarification in the official documents for such a major discrepancy.
Missile is a bullet, I'm not aware of any reference of other fragments found in this case called "missiles".
Even if "removed" Humes made no further reference to it, The document was hidden until 1972.

Find an official reference that missile means fragment would clarify it as not just another lame excuse
25
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: EF-JFKA... Better, but Still Some P.U.
« Last post by Duncan MacRae on Yesterday at 06:53:44 PM »
Quote from: Brian Doyle on Yesterday at 03:11:25 PM
Armstrong is one of the best in the business...He deserves better and his evidence stands up...

26
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Yet Another Bullet That the Lone-Gunman Theory Cannot Explain
« Last post by Mitch Todd on Yesterday at 06:50:36 PM »
Quote from: Michael Capasse on August 29, 2026, 04:29:16 PM
Well then, it should be easy to find clarification in the official documents for such a major discrepancy.
Missile is a bullet, I'm not aware of any reference of other fragments found in this case called "missiles".
Even if "removed" Humes made no further reference to it, The document was hidden until 1972.

Find an official reference that missile means fragment would clarify it as not just another lame excuse 
The "major discrepancy" exists only in your own head and nowhere else. "Missile" has a range of meanings, and the fragments exchanged for the receipt falls within that. For that matter, Sibert and O'Neil both talk about the fragments and the receipt exchanged therefore in their ARRB depositions.
27
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / EF-JFKA... Better, but Still Some P.U.
« Last post by Brian Doyle on Yesterday at 06:48:20 PM »

You are offering yourself and your shallow nay-saying as not only on parr with Armstrong but better...

I think any review or your material vs Armstrong's sleuthing shows that for what it is...

Just Armstrong's Westbrook material is near genius work and cracks the case...

Do you believe Westbrook when he says he walked from the Police Station to the Depository?
28
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: EF-JFKA... Better, but Still Some P.U.
« Last post by Tommy Shanks on Yesterday at 06:35:37 PM »
Quote from: Brian Doyle on Yesterday at 03:11:25 PM
Armstrong is one of the best in the business...He deserves better and his evidence stands up...

You really have to be kidding. His interpretations of the evidence make no sense and some of them are so silly as to almost be a joke. Not sure why you don't realize this...
29
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Explain the logic of Prayer Man please
« Last post by John Corbett on Yesterday at 06:16:55 PM »
Quote from: Brian Doyle on Yesterday at 05:51:16 PM

I forgot to mention I also put the correct interpretation of the Lunch Room Encounter together...

I'll bet you have.  :D
30
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Explain the logic of Prayer Man please
« Last post by Brian Doyle on Yesterday at 05:51:16 PM »


I forgot to mention I also put the correct interpretation of the Lunch Room Encounter together...
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10