Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
21
MTG continues to ignore the inconvenient truth of JBC's arm flip beginning at Z226. That last for 9 frames. Roughly a half a second. Are we supposed to believe that is an illusion too. What does he suppose caused that arm flip. We'll have to keep guessing what MTG things about that because he won't address it.
Not all of us have your psychic power to know what JBC's brain is doing in moving his arm there.  Even JBC himself didn't know. He thought it was because he was turning before he was hit by the bullet he felt. But maybe he didn't have your gift.
22
After Oswald was brought in from the theater, everyone gathered inside the office of Capt. Westbrook.  This office is where the officers filled out their arrest reports.

Inside this office was Westbrook, Barrett and Oswald's wallet (with Oswald and Hidell identifications inside and taken from him by Bentley during the car ride from the theater to headquarters).

Think about it.

I did think about it. In Westbrook's office (or the lunchroom nearby) the gray jacket was marked by officers who were never part of the chain of custody. Officers who actually did handle the jacket at the car park did not mark it and they remain unidentified until this day. The revolver that Hill brought into the station and allegedly carried around with him for more than one hour wasn't marked by the officer who allegedly took it from Oswald and Hill could not positively confirm the revolver came from Oswald as he was only given the weapon in the car that took Oswald to the police station and was told that it belonged to Oswald. So much for the reliability of those officers.

There is no evidence that the wallet Bentley took from Oswald contained the Hidell identification and there is also no evidence that the wallet given to Gus Rose, by yet another unidentified officer, was the same one as the one Bentley took from Oswald.

I have found no record stating that Barrett was in Westbrook's office and that a wallet was there.

You are making statements you can not support with evidence!
23
Tge time pieces that Markham and Bowley relied on were never compared with a reference or were even read/transcribed coorectly.

Neither were the clocks that DPD dispatchers worked with, despite the fact that the supervisor of the dispatchers, J.C. Bowles is on record stating that those clocks were not synchronized and "indicated the incorrect time".

Bowley picked up his daughter from school and schools usually ring there bell on time. If school was out at 1:00 PM, which seems likely to me, and Bowley was already waiting, it is fair and safe to assume he would have left the school at 1:00 PM.
Add on 13 minutes for the drive to 10th Street and he gets there at 1:13 PM, maybe a minute or so after the shooting had taken place.

Markham took the same bus to work every day and she knew she had to be at the bus stop on Jefferson at 1:15 PM, where she would either take a delayed 1:12 bus or the next one at 1:22.
The distance of two blocks she had to walk between 9th Street and Jefferson was (according to the FBI) between 5 to 6 minutes, being approx 2,5 to 3 minutes for each block.
It is highly unlikely that Markham would still be on the corner of 10th and Patton at 1:14 when the shooting allegedly happened.

A third indication that the shooting took place earlier that 1:14 or 1:15 is the fact that the ambulance carrying Tippit arrived at the hospital and attempts were made to revive Tippit until he was declared D.O.A. on 1:15 PM, which is also the time confirmed by DPD officer Davenport, who followed the ambulance to the hospital.

The irony of the LN claim is that all the clocks were wrong except of course those used by the DPD dispatchers. Never mind that the J.C. Bowles said that the DPD clocks did not give the correct time!
24
Now you know why John C. is an LN zealot. The entire world is black and white with no nuances. No wonder he and MTG go at it - they are peas in a pod. Read The Guardian article for yourself and see if it sounds open-and-shut to you.

Yes, the world is black and white. There is only one truth. It's not a multiple-choice exercise. You seem to operate under the premise that there can be alternate realities.
Quote


The article doesn't suggest Reeves had money problems. Yes, at the peak of popularity of Superman, he was making the equivalent of $400K today - not exactly Milton Berle, I guarantee you. He had ongoing salary beefs with the production company. The point was that he was limited in his ability to work on other projects and was pretty solidly typecast by playing Superman and thus was unable to leverage his popularity into serious money.

A very common practice in those days. Clint Walker walked away from the hit show Cheyene because Warner Bros. wouldn't let him make extra money by doing public appearances as his TV character. During his absence while WB negotiated with Walker, they launched two replacement series, Sugarfoot and Bronco which alternated each week. When Walker returned, the three shows became part of a trilogy titled the Cheyene Hour although only the original series lasted for long. Fess Parker negotiated a deal when working on Daniel Boone in which he worked for far less money per episode than most stars in order to receive a share of the profits. When the studio tried to screw him over with creative accounting, he took them to court. James Garner had a similar experience on the Rockford Files. The point is the studios were always in a battle with their stars over money. Reeves was no exception.
Quote

The coroner's autopsy took place only after the corpse had been thoroughly washed. It failed to test for powder traces on Reeves' hand and, even though the top of Reeves' skull was removed, no one checked the head wound for gunpowder traces, which would have been present if he'd shot himself at close range. Nothing explained the bruises on the corpse's face and chest. Reeves showed no signs of a suicidal demeanour, left no note and died naked - extremely unusual for a suicide.


Is there a rule book those who commit suicide are supposed to follow? What are the consequences if they break the rules?
Quote

Other mysterious bullet holes were found in the house. Two were in the floor, with one bullet lodged in the wall of the downstairs living room. Lemmon claimed they'd got there after she fired the gun in an argument with Reeves. Lemmon's volatile nature and Vesuvian temper tantrums have long made her a prime suspect in projected murder scenarios, but here again there is no satisfactory evidence. She did however claim, 30 years later to a young reporter when she was in her declining years in New York, that Bliss had concocted her step-by-step "predictions" of Reeves' suicide. Her subsequent flight from the law is as readily explained by what was already known of her routinely scandalous behaviour as by any imponderable motive she may have had for bumping off Superman. Still, we might plausibly picture some stupid drunken argument over the gun, and a fatal, albeit accidental discharge. The weapon, however, was too recently oiled to retain fingerprints, hers or his.

Isn't it fun to speculate when you don't have any evidence this was anything more than a suicide. Similar to JFK conspiracies. They like to point a finger of suspicion at people who might have had a motive to kill JFK but for which there is zero evidence those people acted on those motives.
Quote

Reeves also had his new girlfriend, Leonore - a piece of work, to be sure, but lots of fun - and a holiday, if not a "honeymoon", had been arranged and was eagerly anticipated. He had been drinking heavily on the night he died, but he had the constitution of an elephant: drink never seemed to affect him anyway. The shell-casing found beneath his body suggested certain realities of ballistics not reconcilable with a verdict of suicide.

This one was debunked a long time ago. It was shown that when a semi-auto is placed to the temple and fired, the casing would eject behind the shooter. Reeves simply fell on top of that shell as collapsed rearward. I'm guessing it was about 40 years ago I saw that one put to bed. I'm wondering how the shell casing under the body could be reconciled with someone else pulling the trigger.

Quote
Hmmm ... sound "just a bit" like any other case you can think of? Maybe it's just me.

It sounds a lot like CT conspiracies. All sizzle. No steak.
25
Tge time pieces that Markham and Bowley relied on were never compared with a reference or were even read/transcribed coorectly.
26
I'm not following your logic. If "they" pissed off the Buddhists of Thailand, doesn't this suggest you think there is something about "them" that pisses people off? This would be different from what I view as antisemitism, which is hatred of Jews simply because they are Jews. I believe Ben lives in Thailand, so maybe he can weigh in. From my reading, there really was nothing we would call antisemitism much before the "Jesus thing." Jews were always outsiders because they insisted on maintaining their culture and religion instead of blending in. I suppose this could be called antisemitism of a sort, but the hatred of the Jews simply because they are Jews seems mostly to flow from Christian mythology. French philosopher René Girard, who is the leading authority on scapegoating, has written extensively on how the Jewish people are the prototypical historical example of scapegoating and that this flows entirely from the "Christ killer" myth.

It’s not “my interpretation” it’s just a reasonable interpretation of what has actually happened. And not just in Thailand. Cicero, for one had criticized their behavior.
27
Humm, well, the previous supposedly definitive analysis of the timing of the Tippit shooting, i.e., Dale Myers' "stop-watch" analysis in his book With Malice, says that Oswald did not have time to walk to 10th and Patton in time to shoot Tippit and theorizes that Oswald got a ride from an unknown person. Myers says Tippit was shot at 1:14:30, but you say he was shot between 1:15 and 1:16.

Is there a reason you failed to mention that T. F. Bowley said he arrived at the Tippit scene at 1:10 and that he knew this because he checked his watch when he got there? That's an important fact to omit, wouldn't you say?

Is there a reason you failed to mention that Helen Markham said she got to the Tippit scene no later than 1:08 and that Tippit had already been shot when she arrived? This is why she was certain Tippit was shot at 1:06 or 1:07. Markham said she always left her apartment at 1:00 to catch her regular 1:12-1:15 bus. She said she glanced at the laundry room clock after she left her apartment and that it read 1:04. She said it took her about two minutes to reach 10th and Patton.

Is there a reason you failed to mention that Domingo Benavides said that he did not try to use the police car's radio until "a few minutes" after Tippit had been shot because he was (quite understandably) afraid for his life?

You guys claim that Benavides waited in his truck for only a matter of seconds and not for a few minutes. But this flies in the face of common sense and ignores what Benavides himself initially said. If you were only 25-50 feet away from a shooting and feared you could be the next target, how long would you wait until coming out into the open? Nobody in their right mind would have come out of hiding so quickly in that situation.

Benavides told the WC he waited in his truck for "a few minutes" after he heard the shots and before he tried to use the police car's radio. Moreover, according to fellow witness Ted Calloway, Benavides told him the day after the shooting that

When I heard that shooting, I fell down into the floorboard of my truck and I stayed there. It scared me to death.

Years later, Benavides changed his story and told CBS he only waited a few seconds, not a few minutes. Predictably, you guys choose to accept Benavides' belated change of story and reject his original statements.

Two witnesses at the Texas Theatre, Butch Borroughs and Jack Davis, independently said that Oswald entered the theater before 1:10, and that he remained in the theater until he was arrested.

You place great emphasis on the police dispatch transcripts, but even Dr. Paul Hoch, one of the most careful scholars in the JFKA research community, acknowledged there is evidence the police dispatch tapes were edited, which renders the transcripts useless for determining when Tippit was shot. BTW, Dr. Hoch doubted the authenticity of the transmissions that supposedly explain why Tippit was in Oak Cliff in the first place, far out of his area.

I discuss Dr. Hoch's research at length in my article "Did Oswald Shoot Tippit?," available at https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_j_022lJYli3B5Xyw8wLs-0nl6mDLo2t/view.


Quote
Is there a reason you failed to mention that T. F. Bowley said he arrived at the Tippit scene at 1:10 and that he knew this because he checked his watch when he got there? That's an important fact to omit, wouldn't you say?

Is there a reason you failed to mention that Helen Markham said she got to the Tippit scene no later than 1:08 and that Tippit had already been shot when she arrived? This is why she was certain Tippit was shot at 1:06 or 1:07. Markham said she always left her apartment at 1:00 to catch her regular 1:12-1:15 bus. She said she glanced at the laundry room clock after she left her apartment and that it read 1:04. She said it took her about two minutes to reach 10th and Patton.

First, there is no such thing as Markham's "1:12-1:15 bus".  Nice try, though.  Intellectually dishonest much?

Second, the statements of witnesses like Mary Wright and Ted Callaway combined with the verbal time stamps on the police tapes tell us that Bowley's watch was wrong and Markham was at that corner much later than 1:07.


Quote
You guys claim that Benavides waited in his truck for only a matter of seconds and not for a few minutes. But this flies in the face of common sense and ignores what Benavides himself initially said. If you were only 25-50 feet away from a shooting and feared you could be the next target, how long would you wait until coming out into the open? Nobody in their right mind would have come out of hiding so quickly in that situation.

So your "common sense" tells you that Benavides was cowering down inside his truck while little old ladies were tending to Tippit and others were gathering around the squad car?


Quote
Two witnesses at the Texas Theatre, Butch Borroughs and Jack Davis, independently said that Oswald entered the theater before 1:10, and that he remained in the theater until he was arrested.

Nonsense.  First, Jack Davis certainly does NOT state that Oswald entered the theater before 1:10.  Ooops, you're a naughty Boy.

Secondly, Burroughs testified to the Warren Commission in 1964 that he didn't see Oswald enter the theater and he also stated that, during the search of the theater, a police officer came up to him and asked him if he had seen the guy and Burroughs told the officer that he had not seen him himself.
28
After Oswald was brought in from the theater, everyone gathered inside the office of Capt. Westbrook.  This office is where the officers filled out their arrest reports.

Inside this office was Westbrook, Barrett and Oswald's wallet (with Oswald and Hidell identifications inside and taken from him by Bentley during the car ride from the theater to headquarters).

Think about it.
29
Sorry, but this story perfectly illustrates the point. People who want something other than a straight forward explanation will seize on every little anomaly to claim things aren't what they seem. Everyone in the house that night had been drinking heavily, including Reeves. He went upstairs and a short time later, the people downstairs heard the gunshot. They immediately went upstairs and found Reeves lying on the bed with a gun at his feet. There was no evidence to indicate this was anything but a suicide. Not surprisingly, the inebriated witnesses didn't recall the evening in the same way but that's hardly an indication of anything but that this was a suicide. It's people trying to make a mountain out of a mole hill.

The Guardian article made some silly claims. One was that the $2500 a week Reevers made for 13 weeks wasn't much to live on for a whole year. In 1953, you could live large on $32,500 a year. That equates to over $400K in today's money. The show ran for six seasons so Reeves should have had a good chunk of change saved up. Other than he Superman series, Reeves had not exactly been an accomplished actor. He did have minor roles in two  of the biggest movies of all time, Gone With the Wind and From Here to Eternity. He did a number of guest roles on other TV programs during the 1950s and was a semi-regular performer on the Kraft Theater, but producers weren't exactly beating down his door to offer him work. His last credited role other than Superman was a guest spot on I Love Lucy in 1957.

Nobody will know why Reeves took his own life. There are lots of reasons people resort to suicide and they aren't always about career failures or fractured relationships although either of these could have played role in Reeves decision. We'll never know.

Now you know why John C. is an LN zealot. The entire world is black and white with no nuances. No wonder he and MTG go at it - they are peas in a pod. Read The Guardian article for yourself and see if it sounds open-and-shut to you.

The article doesn't suggest Reeves had money problems. Yes, at the peak of popularity of Superman, he was making the equivalent of $400K today - not exactly Milton Berle, I guarantee you. He had ongoing salary beefs with the production company. The point was that he was limited in his ability to work on other projects and was pretty solidly typecast by playing Superman and thus was unable to leverage his popularity into serious money.

The coroner's autopsy took place only after the corpse had been thoroughly washed. It failed to test for powder traces on Reeves' hand and, even though the top of Reeves' skull was removed, no one checked the head wound for gunpowder traces, which would have been present if he'd shot himself at close range. Nothing explained the bruises on the corpse's face and chest. Reeves showed no signs of a suicidal demeanour, left no note and died naked - extremely unusual for a suicide.

Other mysterious bullet holes were found in the house. Two were in the floor, with one bullet lodged in the wall of the downstairs living room. Lemmon claimed they'd got there after she fired the gun in an argument with Reeves. Lemmon's volatile nature and Vesuvian temper tantrums have long made her a prime suspect in projected murder scenarios, but here again there is no satisfactory evidence. She did however claim, 30 years later to a young reporter when she was in her declining years in New York, that Bliss had concocted her step-by-step "predictions" of Reeves' suicide. Her subsequent flight from the law is as readily explained by what was already known of her routinely scandalous behaviour as by any imponderable motive she may have had for bumping off Superman. Still, we might plausibly picture some stupid drunken argument over the gun, and a fatal, albeit accidental discharge. The weapon, however, was too recently oiled to retain fingerprints, hers or his.

Reeves also had his new girlfriend, Leonore - a piece of work, to be sure, but lots of fun - and a holiday, if not a "honeymoon", had been arranged and was eagerly anticipated. He had been drinking heavily on the night he died, but he had the constitution of an elephant: drink never seemed to affect him anyway. The shell-casing found beneath his body suggested certain realities of ballistics not reconcilable with a verdict of suicide.


Hmmm ... sound "just a bit" like any other case you can think of? Maybe it's just me.
30
MTG continues to ignore the inconvenient truth of JBC's arm flip beginning at Z226. That last for 9 frames. Roughly a half a second. Are we supposed to believe that is an illusion too. What does he suppose caused that arm flip. We'll have to keep guessing what MTG things about that because he won't address it.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10