Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
21
It is inconceivable that JFK was shot at Z190 and showed no visible reaction until Z226, the same frame JBC showed his visible reaction. Thut is true whether the reaction was neuromuscular or cognitive. It really doesn't matter what type of reaction it was.
22

The unknown whereabouts of the Babushka image(s) is right in line with the Original Nix Film going MIA. You should want access to ALL Possible Evidence.

Why? You'd just say it's been altered to discredit your Abandoned Getaway Car / Huge Gates theory.
Modify message


The physical positions of Babushka and Nix rule out their capturing images of the Elm Street Extension and the railroad yard. Your lack of foundational knowledge is showing.

Bummer!

You mean you can't use them to "substantiate" your tinfoil-hat "Abandoned Getaway Car" / "Huge Gates" conspiracy theory?

Give it a shot (pardon the pun)!

Where there's a will, there's a way!
23
Why?

You'd just say it's been altered to discredit your Abandoned Getaway Car / Huge Gates theory.


      The physical positions of Babushka and Nix rules out their capturing images of the Elm St Ext and the railroad yard. Your lack of foundational knowledge is showing.
25
SMG-

Verily.

It's funny...the same JFKA researchers who suspect very last contrivance and purposeful foul play in the JFKA...then suddenly say about the Diem assassinations--"Oh no, the Kennedy Administration had nothing to do with that!"

Some JFKA buffs guys believe Dulles, or Harvey, or maybe Lansdale, authored the JFKA, based on suspicions...but when JFK is briefed by Amb. Lodge (in a recorded interview) that the coup against the Diems could well be lethal to Diems, and JFK OK's the coup anyway...and never organizes a way for the Diems to leave....they still sanctify JFK.

I am actually a JFK fan. But what is, is. JFK tried to have Castro assassinated too.

Back then that was statecraft.
26
The reason the HSCA didn't think JFK's reaction to being hit was neuromuscular in nature was because it mistakenly believed he had been hit at Z-190, two seconds before the much more realistic Z-222, Z-223, Z-224, or Z-225.

That is the only point I was making.

So, you concede that JFK was hit between Z-222 and Z-225.

Great!
27
I don’t have a story I want to believe apart from what the evidence establishes happened. The only reason to believe the witnesses is because they could not have been all independently wrong. If they had said JFK kept smiling and waving after the first shot, I would have accepted that too. 

Your hypothetical is lame because JFK didn't "keep on smiling and waving" after Oswald's first, missing-everything, shot at "Z-124" (half-a-second before Zapruder resumed filming at Z-133).

He stopped waving and quickly turned his head to his left in Z-144.

https://assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z144.jpg



                                                                                     D'oh! ......... D'oh! ......... D'oh!
28
I've never said witnesses should be ignored. I've said their statements should be compared to the forensic evidence to see if they are corroborated or refuted. Sometimes they get it right.  Sometimes they get it wrong. We shouldn't believe witnesses just because they tell a story we want to believe.
I don’t have a story I want to believe apart from what the evidence establishes happened. The only reason to believe the witnesses is because they could not have been all independently wrong. If they had said JFK kept smiling and waving after the first shot, I would have accepted that too.  But in that case there would have been very different witness recollections as to where the first shot occurred, the shot pattern as well as a very different zfilm. And we wouldn’t necessarily be talking about it because
Oswald may have botched his next shots as he scrambled to set up the rifle on the boxes as the car moved away.

So what is the “forensic evidence” that rebuts the recollections of 25 witnesses that JFK reacted visibly to the first shot (describing actions that are not seen in the zfilm prior to z193)?
29

The reason the HSCA didn't think JFK's reaction to being hit was neuromuscular in nature was because it mistakenly believed he had been hit at Z-190, two seconds before the much more realistic Z-222, Z-223, Z-224, or Z-225.

That is the only point I was making. 
30
How old were you when you first drank the Kool Aide?

120

I asked you how old you were, not how many cups you had.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10