Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
21
The whole body snatcher theory of postmortem surgery is as silly as it gets. It's been about 10 years since I've seen a proponent of this goofball scenario. It is absolutely preposterous to think that postmortem surgery could have been performed on the body and that the pathologists wouldn't have instantly recoginzed it. Even a first year medical student wouldn't be fooled by something like that.

You're speaking the truth, John. I feel like Lifton took advantage of some of the Bethesda witnesses and through the power of suggestion was able to convince them that they saw or heard things that actually never happened.
22
You don't seem to read or retain my posts very well.

Why should I? It's all nonsense.

You don't even seem to know that the recoil of the rifle would move the rifle off the intended target. Oswald would have to reacquire the target in his scope, place the crosshairs on his intended target, and then squeeze the trigger in order to fire an accurate shot. If he rushed any of these, he's not going to hit his target. What reason would Oswald have to try to fire the third shot in as little time as possible.
23
You obviously haven't read Tague's testimony (7 H 555):

Mr. LIEBELER Do you have any idea which bullet might have made that mark?
Mr. TAGUE. I would guess it was either the second or third. I wouldn’t say
definitely on which one.
Mr. LIEBELER . Did you hear any more shots after you felt yourself get hit in
the face?
Mr. TAGUE. I believe I did.
Mr. LIEBELER. You think you did?
Mr. TAGUE. I believe I did.
Mr. LIEBELER. How many?
Mr. TAGUE. I believe that it was the second shot, so I heard the third shot afterwards.
Mr. LIEBELER. Did you hear three shots?
Mr. TAGUE. I heard three shots; yes sir. And I did notice the time on the Hertz clock. It was 12:29.

The WC even remarked "In Tague's opinion, it was the second shot which caused the mark, since he thinks he heard the third shot after he was hit in the face." (WR 116).
So you think a witness who said "I guess" and then wasn't sure if it was the second or third shot is compelling? Why am I not surprised.

He even disagrees with the consensus of opinion that the Hertz clock as 12:30. Nothing he said establishes anything as a fact. He's guessing about everything.
24
I'll bet that made Billy happy.


Thankfully they hadn’t yet started making this stuff yet!



25
There is no evidence as to any of the 3 shots causing Tague's injury, only speculation. The only one I would rule out would be the second one because that was CE399 was recovered intact except for small fragments of lead from the base. What you mean is taking selected witnesses' statements at face value which is a silly thing to do given how often witnesses are wrong about important details. If we take witness statements at face value, we would have to conclude the shooting happened a dozen or more ways. I can read what Hickey said but that doesn't mean I'm going to assume he got everything right. That's your game.
You obviously haven't read Tague's testimony (7 H 555):

Mr. LIEBELER Do you have any idea which bullet might have made that mark?
Mr. TAGUE. I would guess it was either the second or third. I wouldn’t say
definitely on which one.
Mr. LIEBELER . Did you hear any more shots after you felt yourself get hit in
the face?
Mr. TAGUE. I believe I did.
Mr. LIEBELER. You think you did?
Mr. TAGUE. I believe I did.
Mr. LIEBELER. How many?
Mr. TAGUE. I believe that it was the second shot, so I heard the third shot afterwards.
Mr. LIEBELER. Did you hear three shots?
Mr. TAGUE. I heard three shots; yes sir. And I did notice the time on the Hertz clock. It was 12:29.

The WC even remarked "In Tague's opinion, it was the second shot which caused the mark, since he thinks he heard the third shot after he was hit in the face." (WR 116).
26
Do you see JBC reaching his right arm to the rear. If not, your whole exercise is pointless.
I was responding to your comment that the shoulders could not turn without the chest turning. It is generally a good idea to read the quoted part to which the response is referring.
Quote
Quit trying to play doctor. Your arguments are silly enough as a layman.
You weren't playing doctor in suggesting that the bullet entrance was not in the armpit, but now I am?
Quote
In order to save this turkey of a scenario you dreamed up years ago, you keep sounding more and more foolish. In order to buy this crapola, we would have to believe:

1. Oswald fired at JFK while he was still passing under the tree when all he had to do is wait on more second to have a clear shot.
I have shown you many times that JFK was clear when he was between the lamp post and the Thornton sign and was visible and trackable from the SN at all times he was under the tree. He may have wanted to fire the first shot without further delay.  You, on the other hand, believe that he waited for the car to travel a full car length after he was completely clear before deciding to fire a shot.
Quote
2. JFK and JBC were both hit at Z193, but neither reacted immediately. JFK slowly and calmly started to lower his right arm while JBC just continued to turn to look over his right shoulder oblivious to a deep puncture wound in his thigh.
When have I ever said that?  Do you actually read what I have written?
Quote
3. Almost two seconds later at Z226, both men exhibited a delayed reaction to being shot at exactly the same instant when both men suddenly and dramatically flipped their arms upward, JFK in reaction to his throat wound and JBC to his thigh wound.
Again, where did I ever say that JBC was reacting to his thigh wound? (correct answer: Never). He turned around, as he said, because he recognized the sound as a rifle shot and realized an assassination was unfolding.
Quote

4. JBC began twisting to his right and doubled over in reaction to being shot in the thigh, even though he said he did that in reaction to having been shot in the back. Amazing how willing you are to disregard witnesses when they don't fit your BS story.
Nellie said he was turned to the right when hit. JBC wasn't sure how he was turned. Gayle Newman said he was turned sideways when hit.  Who have I missed?

Here is what JBC showed us how he thought he looked when hit:


Does that look like anything seen around z222-226?

Quote
5. JBC, continued to turn dramatically in a clockwise direction until he was facing JFK and the shooter, all in reaction to being shot in the thigh.
Again, that is not what I have ever suggested he was reacting to.  He never felt the thigh wound.
Quote
6. With JBC turned to the rear and his shoulders roughly parallel to the sides of the car and Oswald behind him and slightly right, Oswald managed to fire a shot into his back near his right armpit, even though he had no view of JBC's back, and the bullet made about a 60 degree turn to the right to exit under JBC's right nipple.
Not anything close to a 60 degree deflection. I measure it as 24 degrees:

Quote
7. After having fired his first shot, Oswald took 4.3 seconds to take aim for his second shot but completely missed JFK and hit JBC instead.
He didn't miss by much to hit JBC.  Remember that hair flutter seen by Hickey and Kinney and seen in the zfilm starting about z273?
Quote
8. After missing JFK with his second shot after taking 4.3 seconds to aim, Oswald took only 2.3 seconds, the bare minimum time needed to fire an aimed shot with the Carcano, and made a precision headshot, killing JFK.
That's right. By just missing JFK's head on the second shot and having the gun strapped to his body and resting on boxes, as the car moved a bit right as it proceeded to the underpass the target moved into position.
Quote
One of these items is hard to believe.
I agree. None of them are accurate, as I have shown.  You don't seem to read or retain my posts very well. 

27
      You have No Idea what I am looking at.
On that we can agree.
Quote

 And then you assume that JFK was struck with a routine bullet.  "No soup for you"!

I wouldn't call the 6.5mm Carcano routine. It wasn't a commonly used round, but there was nothing exceptional about it. It falls right between the WWII standard .30-06 (7.62mm) round and the current NATO round of 5.56mm now in use.
Quote

      I am extremely familiar with "Shane". "Torrey" and "Wilson" too. Howard Hughes knew what he was doing when he tried to buy that flick.

     Very telling that you would tie a Hollywood Movie into a discussion of the Current Z Film.

Simply pointing out that people think shooting victims get thrown forcefully by a gunshot like they see in the movies.

Both bullets recovered were 6.5mm Carcano bullets. So were the only three recovered shells. There is no evidence of any other bullet fired in Dealey Plaza that day.
28
LN's or CT's have nothing to do with the " Truth " .
Is there a third choice? Maybe JFK died from a self-inflicted wound.
29
Hello Everyone,

This is my first post - apologies if this topic has been broached before, I was unable to find it using the search feature.

I have followed and tracked the statements recorded by David Lifton and Doug Horne for many years.
Why would you do that? Their theory of postmortem surgery is among the silliest ever made about the JFKA.
Quote
 

I feel I have stitched together the - admittedly complex and at times hard to believe
That's an understatement.
Quote

- timeline of events concerning the casket(s) and body from Parkland to Bethesda.

The one piece of the puzzle which I cannot fit is based on an "off the record" conversation between David Lifton and Richard Lipsey where no recording equipment was permitted or used.

Lipsey stated - and Lifton directly quoted him - that JFK's left arm was raised like a "Heil Hitler salute" when he saw the body at Bethesda.  Furthermore, Lipsey said that "Humes had to jump on the body and lower it with his knee."
And here I though Lifton was crazy. What was I thinking?
Quote

Lifton has discussed this in a few online videos including this series -
Lifton proceeded to hypothesise why the left arm - and only the left arm - was raised.  He implied that this was due to storage conditions for the body aboard the luggage compartment of Air Force 1.
About as silly as the rest of his theory. No more. No less.
Quote

Irrespective of how it was raised, if we take Lipsey at his word,
Why would anyone do that?
Quote

we assume the arm was as raised as it was, I have a major problem.

What I know to be true is that the body was delivered inside a "zipped body bag" inside a "shipping casket" by helicopter, then black cadillac hearse to the back door of the Bethesday morgue at rougly 6:35pm.
What else do you know that isn't true?
Quote

Looking at both the zipped body bag (as cofirmed by Paul O'Connor at Bethesday)
I'm not at all surprised you think Paul O'Connor is a credible witness.
Quote

and the grey shipping casket (as confirmed by Jim Jenkins at Bethesda) I can't physically see how JFK's arm could have been raised at all.  There just isn't the room inside the body bag NOR the casket.
You're starting to sound rational now.
Quote

I would warmly welcome this great community to challenge me on this
I think I already have.
Quote

and I am open to being convinced that this is simply a false statement from Lipsey - he is the only person as far as I know that stated this. Equally, I'm open to being told that the body bags have plenty of room for a raised arm - but logistically, I'm sceptical.

I'm looking forward to your comments.

Thank you.
Not only is Lipsey off his rocker, so are Lifton and Horne. The whole body snatcher theory of postmortem surgery is as silly as it gets. It's been about 10 years since I've seen a proponent of this goofball scenario. It is absolutely preposterous to think that postmortem surgery could have been performed on the body and that the pathologists wouldn't have instantly recoginzed it. Even a first year medical student wouldn't be fooled by something like that.
30
LN's or CT's have nothing to do with the " Truth " .
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10