21
JFK Assassination & General Discussion & Debate / Re: Why Altgens 6 Refutes the Lone-Gunman Theory
« Last post by John Corbett on Today at 10:48:46 AM »DPD officer Stavis Ellis.
Seriously? Well, this is a first. You're the first person I've ever encountered who has disputed the windshield damage visible in Altgens 6.
You're the first person I've come across that proposed Altgens 6 shows damage to the windshield.
Quote
Folks, again, the link for Weldon's chapter on the hole in the limo's windshield has been fixed. I had the wrong link in the first version of the OP. Here it is again:
"The Kennedy Limousine: Dallas 1963"
But I repeat that this thread is not intended to debate the evidence of a hole in the windshield but to show that the lone-gunman theory cannot explain the windshield damage seen in Altgens 6 and in the Zapruder film.
No windshield damage is seen in the Altgens 6 photo. Altgens 6 has been widely available for the 35 years I have debated the JFKA online. You are the first person I've come across who has made this claim. If the windshield was already cracked, whether the missile went through it or not, it would indeed refute the lone gunman theory but since this is something you just made up, it does no such thing. If Altgens 6 showed windshield damage, somebody would have brought it up before now. It shows how desperate you are to make a point that you would simply make something like this up when it is so obvious there is no windshield damage showing in Altgens 6.
Recent Posts
