JFK Assassination Forum

I haven’t seen the footage that shows one glove missing from Michael Jackson

 

  BUMP

The important thing is that the KGB has been waging disinformation, "active measures," and strategic deception counterintelligence operations against us and our NATO allies since 1959,

And we've been doing the same to them. That's what intelligence agencies do.

the hand of the KGB can be discerned in certain aspects of the JFKA,

Unless you have evidence that shows the KGB conspired with Oswald to kill JFK, that statement is pure BS.

 and Russia won the Cold War, as evidenced by the fact that "former" KGB counterintelligence officer Vladimir Putin installed The Traitorous Orange Turd as our "President" on 20 January 2017.

That line is unequivocally BS. The American people installed Trump as President. Twice.

The rioting was done by a small percentage of the protesters and they were acting of their own volition, not on Trump's orders. Trump was not complicit in the rioting no matter how much the TDS crowd insists he was.

  Except, no one believes that.

Is it astounding unreliability "minutes apart" or is it something more mysterious or even sinister? If two eyewitnesses describe an Airbus and a Huey, is witness unreliability a plausible explanation? Lest we forget, these accounts are bookended by Truly saying a white t-shirt with nothing in his hands and Bledsoe saying a brown shirt with a hole in the elbow. "Witness unreliability" is always an easy way out, but sometimes it just isn't plausible. I don't see it as plausible here. One plausible explanation is that Reid fabricated her account, but this would not eliminate Truly. Surely, we would expect Baker to remember the encounter more clearly than Truly. Just one of them genuine Harvey and Lee mysteries, it seems to me (Lee was in the white t-shirt, in case you're keeping score).

But wait, my fellow CTers: I put on my tinfoil thinking cap while outside feeding my menagerie of feral kitties and had the following epiphany. WHAT IF Reid was not off on WHAT she saw but WHEN she saw it? What if she saw Oswald, coke in hand and clad in the white t-shirt he typically wore while working, exiting the lunchroom BEFORE the JFKA! She either conflated the time or fabricated to make the encounter after the JFKA! Pure speculation, except that it might bolster Oswald's alibi and would solve the evidential mystery as to why Baker and Reid seemingly saw two differently clad Oswalds. Nice, no? You're welcome.

If you think eyewitness unreliability is not a factor in these divergent accounts of what Oswald was wearing, then give us a scenario in which all the various witnesses could have correctly described what Oswald was wearing. In lieu of such a scenario, I will continue to chalk up these varying descriptions as evidence of eyewitness reliability. Don't forget to include what Whaley described (a dark shirt with white spots on it, according to my AI). Then there is Earlene Roberts who might have been the best witness because she said she didn't remember what color shirt Oswald was wearing or whether she had ever seen him wearing the jacket he left with. She also answered that she didn't remember to a number of questions. I wish more of these witnesses had simply said they didn't remember instead of confusing the issue by pretending they did.

PS. Oswald has no alibi. He was in the 6th floor sniper's nest at 12:30 firing the shots that killed JFK. That is a mortal lock.

called for peaceful protest? once again you're FoS:

“We’re probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them because you’ll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength, and you have to be strong.”

"We fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore."

“If the liberal Democrats take the Senate and the White House — and they’re not taking this White House — we’re going to fight like hell, I’ll tell you right now,”

Nice job of taking the quote out of context. Here's a video of what he actually said:


You seem to think that the word "fighting" always means physically. Of course that is ludicrous. You can fight through legal and peaceful means and that is what Trump was advocating for.  He did nothing more than to call on Republicans in Congress to do what the Democrats tried to do following the 2000, 2004, and 2016 elections which the Republicans won. He wanted them to refuse to certify the electoral college results and he was no more successful in his efforts than the Dems had been in their 3 previous presidential election defeats.

President 'Pedo' put his VPs life in danger then watched it like a sporting event while his staff and family begged him to stop it.
[/quote]