JFK Assassination Forum

Got it.  You can't explain why the investigators would act in the way you suggest.  It doesn't concern you that there is no narrative that explains this.  in fact, it is entirely contrary to your nonsense that there is doubt of Oswald's guilt in the Tippit murder and someone involved in the investigation was framing him.  Instead in this instance you insist that his wallet was found at the crime scene and the same investigators covered up this highly incriminatory piece of evidence linking him to the crime.   I thought folks in "Europe" were busy watching the US dominate the World Cup.  U-S-A, U-S-A.

Aren't you sometimes ashamed to peddle that nonsense.

It's you who is peddling nonsense. Stop making up things that you claim I said, but never did.

I thought folks in "Europe" were busy watching the US dominate the World Cup.  U-S-A, U-S-A.

Perhaps you should stop thinking. We would all be better off.

Btw, I am not in the least interested in the World Cup.

In his WFAA interview with Jay Watson just after the events, Zapruder said he heard the first shot and saw JFK reacting. He then heard one or two more shots after JFK started reacting:


It makes no sense that he would fail to hear the first shot.  Everyone heard it. Zapruder was not counting the shots after that first shot and wasn’t sure if there were one or two more after that.

Sitzman described the shots as a noise off in the distance. Nothing compared to the sirens or the coke bottle smashing.
This rules out Jiggle Analysis as a valid approach to the Z-film. The noise of the shots wasn't enough to startle Zapruder.

What conspiracy theory would that be?  If some TDS nut job cuts the Reflecting Pool liner and dumps some chemicals into it, there is no conspiracy.  Of course, there are some conspiracies that have merit.  There was a conspiracy to kill Lincoln.  It's interesting that in the JFK context that a "conspiracy" conflates to a false story.

So you’re saying the people (darned leftist domestic terrorists!) who allegedly defaced the Reflecting Pool (and openly rejoiced afterward) weren’t working together?

Instead of playing the endless contrarian give us a narrative that explains Oswald's wallet being left at the Tippit murder scene and the investigators covering that up.

Why would I give you a narrative for something I have never said.

You have already been told that nobody claims that investigators covered up a wallet found at the Tippit murder scene, yet you keep on repeating it. it is not my problem if you can't understand what is written.

Got it.  You can't explain why the investigators would act in the way you suggest.  It doesn't concern you that there is no narrative that explains this.  in fact, it is entirely contrary to your nonsense that there is doubt of Oswald's guilt in the Tippit murder and someone involved in the investigation was framing him.  Instead in this instance you insist that his wallet was found at the crime scene and the same investigators covered up this highly incriminatory piece of evidence linking him to the crime.   Aren't you sometimes ashamed to peddle that nonsense.  I thought folks in "Europe" were busy watching the US dominate the World Cup.  U-S-A, U-S-A.

Instead of playing the endless contrarian give us a narrative that explains Oswald's wallet being left at the Tippit murder scene and the investigators covering that up.  Particularly if you think they are involved in framing Oswald.  Explain it.  Don't deflect to some contrarian nonsense.

Instead of playing the endless contrarian give us a narrative that explains Oswald's wallet being left at the Tippit murder scene and the investigators covering that up.

Why would I give you a narrative for something I have never said.

You have already been told that nobody claims that investigators covered up a wallet found at the Tippit murder scene, yet you keep on repeating it. it is not my problem if you can't understand what is written.