Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
21
Umm, Dr. Charles Gregory, the surgeon who operated on Connally's wrist, said that the shattering of the distal radius bone and the severing of part of the radial nerve would cause immediate and complete loss of function in the hand.---MTG

This is my recollection of what Gregory said also. Can you find reference to this in the WC?

I have reasonable doubts that Gov. JBC held onto his hat after being shot through the wrist.

Ergo, a reasonable deduction is JBC had not yet been shot by Z-275.

22
In a democracy, you can't always get what you want. Deal with it.

Under Trump it is fascism.
How about them Epstein files huh? 38,000 times
23
When Don Jeffries began posting his Zionism theories as the "connection" between 9/11, the JFKA, the USS Liberty, the RFKA and who knows what else...to plaudits...well, P.U.

The EF-JFKA won't be missed. A shallow grave is good enough.

James DiEugenio should be ashamed of himself, actually giving credence to Joan Mellen's whack-a-doodle USS Liberty crackpot-isms.

Niedernut is beneath contempt.

24
TDS is just a cheap cop-out. We are all responsible for words and actions. All of us.
I don't blindly hate Trump. I am from the NYC area, so I've known a lot about him for a long time. 

I know, I want my country back. I want an EPA. I want a Dept of Education. I want a fair and unbiased FCC. I want "Voice of America and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty" back. I want NPR. I am a former broadcaster. I want a Consumer Protection Agency and other watchdog groups. I want a CDC I trust will act in the best interest of science and of course the public. I want National Park Rangers among other things.  FGS !

I don't want a POTUS that puts 100K vets out of their homes because it was a "Biden Program". Or a WH that cuts off food to a Catholic orphanage because the Pope said some "bad things". Then suddenly, Sean Hannity has to insult the Pontiff.

It is not his White House!  There is a process for renovations, especially of that size. Going to a 20K+ seat public arena in this hated environment is proof enough he doesn't need a ballroom for security reasons. On his visit to China, Pres. XI gave him seeds for Jackie's Rose Garden. Do you really think XI didn't know he destroyed it? Put the White House back or be fined.

The whole world sees how dangerous and reckless Trump is. Long time allies Spain, Italy, Poland, and Germany have turned away from us. France will no longer report its nuclear arsenal to the US, and has taken all of its gold out of NY. Meanwhile our "Sec. of War" was sent home in disgrace from a Normandy Memorial. Now, we're stuck in another useless war in the middle east. This time of our own making. We got Hegseth coming on like its a Holy Armageddon. Israel committing genocide.

I want a closed border as much as anyone but I have a huge problem with these detention centers and kidnapping people on only a civil warrant (if that). It was supposed to be the worst of the worst. Up to 70% are confirmed with no criminal record. Yet, they build more of these camps. why? How many are incarcerated for 6 months or more than a year?  Shouldn't it be a rotating door? Where does the deportation part come in? 

Speaking of deportation, I wonder how many that went to CECOT actually belong there? It only takes one to fail the entire program. Imagine that hell?

I am 68 years old. I have voted since 1976. I have always been politically aware. POTUS come and go - sometimes we lean to the right, sometimes left. All within an acceptable margin. Not anymore.  Like a "Super Villain" this actually is the danger of a madman upon the world. His recent "Meet the Press" appearance is just a glimpse into that instability. Congress MUST act. We cannot sustain this.

In a democracy, you can't always get what you want. Deal with it.
25
A couple of snips from “Phantom Shot” by Mike Majerus and Jack Nessan:


Dr. E. Forrest Chapman was a Deputy Medical Examiner in the State of Michigan who had a background in forensic pathology. In 1973, he was allowed to examine some of the Kennedy assassination evidence in the National Archives.

The Warren Commission firearms experts who examined CE 543 failed to mention one other curious thing about the shell casing, something Dr. Chapman referred to as the "dishing effect." When the trigger is pulled and the firing pin strikes the primer at the base of the shell casing, the firing pin makes a small indentation in the soft metal of the primer. Dr. Chapman noticed that the indentation on the CE 543 primer was larger than the indentations on the other shell casings found in the sniper's nest. This indicated that the firing pin had struck CE 543 more than once. The second time the pin struck, the indentation became larger. This was another indication that the shell casing had been used for dry firing. Chapman also noticed that the primer on CE 543 was pushed inward in a concave fashion, and was curved like a bowl or a contact lens. His tests showed that this effect only occurred when the firing pin struck the primer of an empty shell casing. The absence of an explosion meant that it had much less resistance than it did when it was a live shell. As a result, the firing pin pushed deeper into the soft metal of the primer when the shell was empty, causing the concave indentation.


Here is an image from the above referenced book:




And here is an image of CE 543 that (to my eyes) doesn’t show any evidence of dishing or anything else I might associate with dry-firing:




I have been reading the expert WC testimony of FBI agent Robert Frazier and looking at the related images. I cannot imagine that Frazier and his team would have missed any dishing effect and other disfiguring to the primer caused by LHO dry firing the rifle with CE 543 in the chamber as Chapman claims.

Has anyone here researched this subject or know of any evidence that might shed more light on this claim?
26
The original Derangement Syndrome, insofar as I know, was called Bush Derangement Syndrome. There are always those so far at the political extreme that the opposition party's candidate is going to provoke some form of Derangement Syndromen in them. I can definitely recall Reagan Derangement Syndrome. Trump is an extreme personality at best, and the policy differences between him on the one hand and Hillary-Biden-Kamala on the other were so stark that a more widespread form of Derangement Syndrome than is usually the case was inevitable (Kamala Derangement Syndrome almost as much as TDS). But this isn't what we're now talking about. We're talking about someone who is pretty clearly, to me anyway, pathologically disturbed. If he was your wacky old grandfather who sometimes says or does things that embarrass the family, that would be OK. But this is someone with too much responsibility, and too much power, to allow it to continue. To recognize this has nothing to do with TDS - good grief, I VOTED FOR HIM TWICE. As Michael said, in this context the claim of TDS is just a cop-out. Refusing to see what seems so obvious to me and many others is, it seems to me, its own species of Trump Derangement Syndrome. There are probably 25 Republicans who could replace Trump, and who would move forward with much the same policies, but who would bring an immediate end to the concern and fear that Trump's Presidency generates not only in America but around the world because he is so obviously unfit to hold this kind of responsibility and power.
27
TDS is just a cheap cop-out. We are all responsible for words and actions. All of us.
I don't blindly hate Trump. I am from the NYC area, so I've known a lot about him for a long time. 

I know, I want my country back. I want an EPA. I want a Dept of Education. I want a fair and unbiased FCC. I want "Voice of America and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty" back. I want NPR. I am a former broadcaster. I want a Consumer Protection Agency and other watchdog groups. I want a CDC I trust will act in the best interest of science and of course the public. I want National Park Rangers among other things.  FGS !

I don't want a POTUS that puts 100K vets out of their homes because it was a "Biden Program". Or a WH that cuts off food to a Catholic orphanage because the Pope said some "bad things". Then suddenly, Sean Hannity has to insult the Pontiff.

It is not his White House!  There is a process for renovations, especially of that size. Going to a 20K+ seat public arena in this hated environment is proof enough he doesn't need a ballroom for security reasons. On his visit to China, Pres. XI gave him seeds for Jackie's Rose Garden. Do you really think XI didn't know he destroyed it? Put the White House back or be fined.

The whole world sees how dangerous and reckless Trump is. Long time allies Spain, Italy, Poland, and Germany have turned away from us. France will no longer report its nuclear arsenal to the US, and has taken all of its gold out of NY. Meanwhile our "Sec. of War" was sent home in disgrace from a Normandy Memorial. Now, we're stuck in another useless war in the middle east. This time of our own making. We got Hegseth coming on like its a Holy Armageddon. Israel committing genocide.

I want a closed border as much as anyone but I have a huge problem with these detention centers and kidnapping people on only a civil warrant (if that). It was supposed to be the worst of the worst. Up to 70% are confirmed with no criminal record. Yet, they build more of these camps. why? How many are incarcerated for 6 months or more than a year?  Shouldn't it be a rotating door? Where does the deportation part come in? 

Speaking of deportation, I wonder how many that went to CECOT actually belong there? It only takes one to fail the entire program. Imagine that hell?

I am 68 years old. I have voted since 1976. I have always been politically aware. POTUS come and go - sometimes we lean to the right, sometimes left. All within an acceptable margin. Not anymore.  Like a "Super Villain" this actually is the danger of a madman upon the world. His recent "Meet the Press" appearance is just a glimpse into that instability. Congress MUST act. We cannot sustain this.
28

    Trump immediately shut the border down and what happened? The economy of Calif nose dived. Calif NOW admits to being $18 Billion in debt. Calif is a modern day Tammany Hall. This explains how Kamala came outta there. That woman rose inside Calif due to her "ties" to Willie Brown. Everybody knows this but looks the other way, just as they now do with that nut-job sporting the Nazi Tattoo. The common denominator here being the Dem tie. The Dem's have gone off the rails due to TDS. 
29
You choose to ignore the hard photographic evidence that the back wound was caused by a bullet that hit at an upward angle and that the bullet's track tunneled upward. Why? Because, you say, "If that bullet had passed through JFK on an upward trajectory, it would have to have been fired from below and behind JFK. Of course that is a ludicrous proposition."

No, this just shows your severe ignorance and extreme bias. You don't even know the basics of the case. Since Elm Street slopes downward, and since JFK's head and upper torso were leaning slightly forward, a shot fired from the first or second floor of the Dal-Tex Building would have hit JFK's back at an upward angle. Incidentally, the Dal-Tex Building was the same building where Mafia man Eugene Brading was arrested for acting suspiciously right after the shooting, and the same building from which some witnesses said they heard shots fired.

Oh, so you can believe that shot could go through JFK on an upward angle if fired from above and behind him if fired from the Dal-Tex building but not if fired from the TSBD. I'd love to see your calculation that such a shot is feasible from a second floor location but not a sixth floor location.
Quote

I should add that the fact that the autopsy photo of the back wound proves the bullet hit and traveled at an upward angle is one of the findings that "the HSCA FPP UNANIMOUSLY concluded." Indeed, this was one of the few FPP findings that Wecht did not dispute. Also, the only way Baden, the FPP chairman, could explain this fact was by assuming that JFK was leaning nearly 60 degrees forward when the bullet struck.

And, oh, well, of course you claim that Connally was "off" when he insisted he was certain he was not hit before Z229, even after he studied a high-quality color print of the Zapruder film under high magnification frame by frame. Somehow he just "missed" the specious pre-Z229 "reactions" that you and other SBT defenders claim to see in the film, even though Connally was the one who actually experienced the shooting and knew himself better than anyone else.

JBC was looking specifically for the reaction he remembered making and found it post Z230. He wasn't looking for the reflexive reaction that he had no memory of making.
Quote

Obviously, Connally didn't see any significance in the movement of his right arm in Z226, certainly not as an indication that he'd been hit yet. Z226 merely shows the continuation of a movement he began several frames earlier as he was turning back from looking at JFK. You must be blind to claim that his movement resembles the sudden and dramatic jolting forward of JFK's torso and the upward flinging of his hands and elbows from Z226-232. You must be kidding.

JBC began rotating his  torso to the front a few frames earlier. His arm movement began at Z226 and was just as rapid and dramatic as JFK's arm movement. The up and down motion of JBC's right arm lasted for 9 frames, a half a second, and was immediately followed by the reaction which JBC remembered making.  I don't suppose you have any explanation for what caused JBC's rapid up and down arm flip.
Quote

BTW, I'm guessing you're unaware that at the ABA mock Oswald trial, SBT defender Dr. Robert Piziali of Failure Analysis admitted under cross-examination that JFK's Z225 reaction means the bullet must have hit him no later than Z221. Years earlier, Dr. John Lattimer, to his credit, made the same admission.

For years I have been of the belief that JFK/JBC were struck in the Z222-223 window. That's as precise as we can get given the timepiece we have to work with, which is the Z-film. With each frame covering 1/18 second of time, that is as precise as we can get.
Quote

You make the hilarious statement that "the claim that JBC could not have held onto his hat after being shot in the wrist is a bogus one based on assumptions by laymen who have no idea what they are talking about." 

Umm, Dr. Charles Gregory, the surgeon who operated on Connally's wrist, said that the shattering of the distal radius bone and the severing of part of the radial nerve would cause immediate and complete loss of function in the hand. Dr. Wecht, a former president of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences, said the same thing. Even the FPP majority could not agree on how long Connally could have gripped the hat after his wrist was hit, and they made no effort to explain how he could have still held the hat even as late as Z272.

The only layman making bogus claims here is you.

The fact that there is disagreement among the FPP is an indication it is not an established fact that JBC could not have held onto his had after being shot through the wrist. If you have proof of which of these medical examiners is right and which ones are wrong, please post it. In absence of such, it is an unproven assertion.
30
I'm an infrequent participant on this thread because it really doesn't mean squat to me. When my wife I and screwed up our mail-in ballots in the 2020 election, we said the hell with it and didn't care enough to get new ones or vote in person. We are blessed to live in a town, and to live a lifestyle, where it's mostly still 1957. If I encounter a Black guy on one of my 5 AM walks, as I sometimes do, both of us know it's going to be nothing more than "Good morning, how ya doin'?" Trump, Biden, et al., are never even mentioned in our many interactions with our neighbors; they just aren't relevant to our lives. All of the assorted paranoia-fueled "protections" that seem to characterize modern life - guns, Byrna and Mace, elaborate security systems, cameras everywhere, survivalist stockpiles, blah blah blah - are simply not part of our lives. Unless we're going to be gone overnight, we don't even lock our doors. The only "incident" I've had in 29 years of living here is that some goofballs stole some decorative rocks out of my yard at 2 AM, apparently thinking they were way more valuable than they were.

The radio stations I get most clearly in the garage, where I do most of my workouts and hobbies, are "The Big Talker" right-wing conservative talk radio (Glenn Beck, Mark Levin, etc.) and American Family right-wing Christian talk radio. I can listen to them without coming unglued, although I do a fair amount of talking back. What's incredible is how one-dimensional and cartoonish they are. "The Democrats" and "the left" and "the liberals" are spoken of with a snarl, as though all Democrats and liberals are fungible and the listeners understand that these terms are simply code for "everything we hate and everyone we wish were dead." It's just completely unnuanced and mindless. I also enjoy, in a perverse sort of way, reading the comments at FOX News for the same reason - they are simply jaw-droppingly predictable and ignorant. Sometimes I'll make an innocuous little non-Trumpian comment of my own just to stir up the natives and accumulate 187 "dislike" votes. (And, yes, I know - MSNBC and its ilk are no different.)

I am someone who is probably 75% conservative - but a rational, issue-by-issue, non-doctrinaire sorta-kinda conversative. God knows what a rational, issue-by-issue, non-doctrinaire 75% liberal must feel like in this environment. I see absolutely no hope that America will ever resemble a country again. On both sides, the inmates are running the asylum and all forms of media just ratchet up the hatred and fragmentation. Something has to give, and it eventually will. I always say I'm glad I'm 76 and not 7.6, because it isn't going to be pretty. (I've been saying this since I was 45 and saying I was glad I wasn't 4.5.) If I had to bet on America existing 100 years from now as a 50-state republic in anything like its present form, I'd bet everything I own against it.

When Trump was elected in 2016, my best friend, who lives in the Big City, was ready to move to Canada. I talked him down off the ledge by simply asking "Honestly, what difference has it ever made to your life or mine who the President was?" If Hillary or Kamala had been elected, life here in 1957 would not have missed a beat. I was fully prepared for that with Hillary - didn't stay up to watch one minute of election coverage. What mystifies me about Trump now is the number of people who are seemingly oblivious to the pretty obvious reality that, apart from any policy issue, this is a seriously disturbed and potentially very dangerous man. He is an existential threat to life here in 1957 in a way that no other President has ever been. Even though I'm glad I'm 76 and not 7.6, I'd still like to make it to 80 in my little corner of 1957. Give me Hillary any day - and I can't stand her!

I actually feel sorry for people, including some on this obscure JFKA forum, who almost seem to feel it's some sort obligation, some duty as a citizen, to be caught up in the divisiveness and hate. Very strange and self-destructive, it seems to me.

Yep, pretty much like this -

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10