Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
21
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Tosh Plumlee Finds an Important Photograph
« Last post by Fred Litwin on Yesterday at 02:53:15 PM »
Tosh Plumlee Finds an Important Photograph

Wow! A photograph of Jack Ruby, Johnny Roselli, Sam Giancana, Ed McLamore, and Lee Harvey Oswald.

So, where is this supposed photograph?



If only we could find this photo!

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/tosh-plumlee-finds-an-important-photograph
22
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: U.S. Politics
« Last post by John Corbett on Yesterday at 01:18:31 PM »
Right now, things are looking good for the Democrats going into the midterms but that can change.  9 months is an eternity in politics. An impressive amount of economic data has been posted but few Americans are going to delve deeply into that data. People vote on how they perceive things are going for them. The single biggest driver of voter turnout is the pissed off factor and that is almost always directed at the party in power. If voters see significant improvement in the area of wages vs. prices, the GOP could survive the midterms. If not, the Democrats will almost certainly take back the House and have a reasonable chance of taking back the Senate, even though they need a net gain of 4 seats to do that. In politics, perception is the reality and unless voters truly believe things are getting better economically, the GOP is in trouble.
23
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Nothing seems to have changed
« Last post by John Corbett on Yesterday at 01:07:14 PM »
I was a regular contributor on John McAdams discussion group until his untimely death a few years ago. With his passing, that effectively killed that group because I believe he was the sole moderator left and there was no one who could approve new posts.

The debate of conspiracy doesn't seem to have changed much. Much of the discussion is about some of the same points that were being made when I first started debating this topic online shortly after the release of Oliver Stone's movie. If anything, the focus seems to have shifted to the minutia since no one seems to be able to point to any hard evidence that anyone except Oswald took part in the crime.

The body of evidence is like a carcass that has been picked clean. After over 62 years, two things remain the same. ALL the forensic evidence points to Lee Harvery Oswald as the assassin and there isn't a scrap of credible evidence that he had any co-conspirators. Most Americans put the assassination in their rearview mirror years ago and no longer care about it if they ever did at all. I'm sure the JFK assassination means as much to the millennials and the Gen-Zers as the McKinley assassination means to baby boomers like me. It is something that happened a long time ago that they read about in their history books. In fact, there is about as much time between the McKinley and JFK assassinations as there is between the JFK assassination and the present. Continued "investigation" of the crime has become nothing more than a niche hobby engaged in mostly by old geezers like me and nothing of significance is going to come of it. Oswald will go down in history as the sole assassin of JFK and no one will ever be identified as a co-conspirator. Attempts to prove there was a conspiracy remain a fool's errand. Nothing is going to come of it.
24
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: New Poll: Was there an exit wound in the back of JFK's head?
« Last post by John Corbett on Yesterday at 12:45:19 PM »
Quote from: Jarrett Smith on Yesterday at 02:32:19 AM
Agent Clint Hill [Secret Service]: Mrs. Kennedy was holding on to the President, his head still in her lap. “Mrs. Kennedy,” I said, “Please let us help the President…”

She would not let go.

That’s the one thing that I can’t get out of my mind– the picture of him lying in her lap– with his head exposed to me– just looking into the back of his head—into his brain– his eyes fixed—blood and brains and bone fragments all over the car.

The right rear portion of the President’s head was missing– it was lying in the rear seat of the car.



Your photo clearly shows the skull flap on the side of JFK's head. That is what exposed JFK's brain. There was a massive blowout wound to the upper right side of JFK's head. The original autopsy described it as being chiefly parietal but extending into the occipital and temporal regions. So yes, the blowout was partially toward the rear of the head. Most of the skull pieces that were blown out remained attached to the scalp and it is my belief Jackie tried to close those flaps on the way to Parkland as best she could. What she couldn't close was the hole left by the Harper fragment which was blown completely away and found later that day. That explains why the ER team got the impression the blowout was limited to the rear of the head when in fact it extended along the entire upper right side of JFK's head.
25
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: New Poll: Was there an exit wound in the back of JFK's head?
« Last post by Steve Barber on Yesterday at 03:37:01 AM »
Quote from: Tom Graves on February 06, 2026, 12:27:22 AM
New Poll:

Was there an exit wound in the back of JFK's head?


Sonderführer Storing and zombified-by-"JFK" Jarrett Smith say "Da!"


What do you say?

 No.
26
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: New Poll: Was there an exit wound in the back of JFK's head?
« Last post by Jarrett Smith on Yesterday at 02:32:19 AM »
Agent Clint Hill [Secret Service]: Mrs. Kennedy was holding on to the President, his head still in her lap. “Mrs. Kennedy,” I said, “Please let us help the President…”

She would not let go.

That’s the one thing that I can’t get out of my mind– the picture of him lying in her lap– with his head exposed to me– just looking into the back of his head—into his brain– his eyes fixed—blood and brains and bone fragments all over the car.

The right rear portion of the President’s head was missing– it was lying in the rear seat of the car.

27
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Couple of Oswald questions
« Last post by Benjamin Cole on Yesterday at 01:38:49 AM »
SK:

Yes, if I remember correctly, Marina was aware of LHO's pending trip to MC. It was part of plan he was hatching to return them both to Russia, or possibly to Cuba (although he may have wished to go to Cuba alone).
28
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Couple of Oswald questions
« Last post by Gerry Down on Yesterday at 12:35:29 AM »
She knew.

I don't think he had a key. There was a curfew at the rooming house, something like 11pm or something that people had to be back by. Not sure if he had a key to his own bedroom, the key probably stayed in the lock on the inside of the bedroom door.
29
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Couple of Oswald questions
« Last post by Sean Kneringer on Yesterday at 12:15:39 AM »
1. Did Marina know about the Mexico City trip before he went there?
2. Did Oswald have a key to the boarding house? If so, did they find it on his person or in his room after his arrest?
30
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: New Poll: Was there an exit wound in the back of JFK's head?
« Last post by John Corbett on February 08, 2026, 11:07:50 PM »
Was there an exit wound in the back of JFK's head? Not according to every qualified forensic medical examiner who has seen the autopsy photos and x-rays. Determining whether a wound is an entrance or exit is very simple for these people and the original autopsy team, the HSCA FPP, and every other medical examiner who has reviewed the material has agreed that a bullet struck JFK in the BACK of the head. Even conspiracy theorist Dr. Cyril Wecht, who believes there was also a frontal shot agrees a bullet hit JFK's head from the rear. His belief of a second head shot from the front is not based on forensic pathology, but on his interpretation of the Zapruder film. He should really stay in his lane. I doubt in all his years as a medical examiner he ever had a film of a shooting to aid him in his findings. He is basing his belief of a second head shot on something outside his area of expertise.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10