21
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: When are the CTs here going to tell us who, specifically, killed JFK?
« Last post by Sean Kneringer on Yesterday at 08:11:28 PM »The old chestnut: rogue elements in the CIA.
I believe the 2+ minute gap between our seeing the Bogus Motorcycle Cop heading Down the Elm St Ext and the Military Man then coming Up/Exiting the Elm St Ext and entering the train yard connects these 2 individuals. The Elm St Extension and the Train Yard have been overlooked for 62+ yrs. They are JFK Assassination Research virgin ground along with being geographically connected.
When are the CTs here going to tell us who, specifically, killed JFK? "All we can say for sure is that it had to be the evil, evil, Deep State!" LOL!

Have you ever watched a "TUMBLING Team"? Do you believe they are facing, "BACKWARD"?
I'll type slower this time to make it easier for you to follow. In order for the bullet to strike JBC's wrist while traveling backward, it would have to tumble into that orientation. These two concepts are not mutually exclusive. One depends on the other.
Now, I ask you again. Do you deny that a Carcano bullet will tumble (or yaw if you prefer that term) upon exiting soft tissue?
I haven’t seen the footage that shows one glove missing fromMichael Jackson
![]()
This whole thread has been suspect from the get go. The true purpose has been culminating in your recent posts of the pictures of shells and your explanation for your actions and posts. No one needed one more picture with your ridiculous lines on them. It could not be more obvious how deceitful this has become.
The difference between you making a claim and expressing an opinion is you having been told how stupid it was to think the shells would have the exact same dent in the exact same place on so many shells and the unfired cartridge as a result of the rear bridge or any location for that matter. The rear bridge could never have caused the dent in CE 543, and you have not shown where it was even remotely a possibility. A picture of the dent in CE 543 needs to show the dimple in the middle of the dent or would that cast this whole bizarre nonsense in a bad light. Where is the top-down picture of the shell you were claiming was CE 543. That is OK, it doesn’t matter; it is only a few pages back in the thread. By your own statements regarding the dent, it is either flared or not a picture of CE 543.
