Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
21
For those who don't know, "how the cow eats the cabbage" (a/k/a "how the cow ate the cabbage") is a common saying among rural folk. My late wife, who grew up on a remote Arizona ranch, used to say it all the time. It usually seemed to be used in the sense of "I'm gonna have to set that fool straight on how the cow ate the cabbage" or "good grief, you'd think by now the idiot would know how the cow eats the cabbage." See, you learned something today!

Here's a similar tidbit you may not know: Many people attempted to invest the REM song "Losing My Religion" with deep meaning. Michael Stipe explained that "losing my religion" is just a Southern expression like "well, shut my mouth." As in, "When I saw Shirley's new hairdo, I dang near lost my religion." You're welcome.
22
OK, I'll let it go after this: When you think about it, the murder claim, like so much lunatic fringe CT stuff, fails the most basic "What sense would that have made?" test. Lee Bowers is whacked on a remote highway almost three years after the JFKA after saying everything he possibly could have said about it - on camera with Mark Lane, no less - but Ruth Paine lives to be 123 and Marina is still with us. Virtually none of the "mystery deaths," including Pitzer, makes any sense.

Pitzer wasn't even at the autopsy. Many who actually were lived long lives and spoke freely, some making wild CT-oriented claims. Dennis David lived until 2017. What could Pitzer possibly have said that others who weren't murdered couldn't have said? He was retiring after an impeccable 30-year Navy career to teach at a podunk junior college. "Yeah, let's eliminate him now, three years after the JFKA." WHY? What sense would that make? "And let's not just eliminate him, but let's do it in his work area at the Bethesda National Naval Medical Center on a Saturday. We'll somehow do it within minutes after he is seen buying cigarettes at the Navy Exchange Building, where he is teased by a woman about his sloppy appearance." WHY? What sense would that make?

Think, people. Don't just do what characters like MTG do - seize upon all sorts of dubious "facts" while ignoring that the entire premise of murder simply MAKES NO SENSE. Granted, my scenario is highly iffy at best, but at least it MAKES SENSE.

Oh, the "negative paraffin test" that MTG thinks is big stuff? Allan Eaglesham once thought so as well. Here is a 2006 post from the Ed Forum where he explains his mistake, which also give you some idea of the level at which he dived into the Pitzer suicide:

1. NEGATIVE PARAFFIN TEST

In discussing this aspect previously [1], I made the assumption that a dermal nitrate test was referred to in the FBI report; in the early 1960s, "paraffin test" and "dermal nitrate test" were synonymous. With closer inspection of the hand-written laboratory notes (see Figure), I realized that I was in error.

The autopsy doctors prepared paraffin casts of the palm and back of LCDR Pitzer's right hand, presumably expecting them to be used for dermal-nitrate analysis, unaware that the FBI had since replaced this test for analysis of gunshot-residue metals barium (Ba) and antimony (Sb) by flame atomic absorption spectroscopy. For the latter test, acid-moistened cotton swabs are taken directly from the skin. It appears that the laboratory technician did what he could to collect samples from the surfaces of the paraffin casts, concentrating on dark particles 1-4 from the back of the hand and dark particles 5-8 from the palm, none of which tested positively for barium or antimony. The technician was strictly truthful in saying, "Examination of (the) paraffin cast reflected no substance characteristic of, or which could be associated with, gunpowder or gunshot residue," but clearly this was not the whole story. The assay was not performed properly and there was the clear possibility of false negative results. Most significantly, however, the cast from the back of the hand revealed the presence of "large amounts of blood, skin, and hair" (see Figure). Blowback of tissues had occurred from the entry wound onto the back of the hand, some of which had been immobilized in the paraffin cast. The right hand had, indeed, been close to the right temple at the moment of discharge.
23
She was a very flighty lady from what I had seen of her in interviews. I don't understand the deal with her on TMWKK, it was nothing she hadn't said before.

   I agree with you. Woodward is ditzy. Sitzman was too. Woodward acts like she was flim-flamed by TMWKK, but by 1988, she was around 47 yrs old. By 47 she should know "how the cow eats the cabbage". I don't care if she has a college degree, speaks Spanish, etc. She's a Dingbat.
24
The truth is, absolutely no one saw anyone point a rifle and shoot Jack Kennedy in Dealey Plaza, whether they be the first, second, third or 10th shooter.
25
Thank you for that. We see that Jack Kennedy is clearly hit and JC is looking forward, in no discomfort and still holding his hat in his right hand. That ties with the testimony of Nell and John Connally quite well when they said JC was hit two seconds after Kennedy.

Ann Donaldson, Woodward's roommate, clears up Woodward's confusion. She states there were only two shots. Just like the majority of the other eyewitnesses. Brown and Alonzo must have agreed.

Another example of no Early Missed Shot having ever occurred. Like another one was needed to prove the point.

Courtesy of Pat Speer's website.

Ann Donaldson (11-22-63 first person account published in the Washington Evening Star, Second Extra Edition. Note: this article was apparently picked up from a Jackson, Mississippi paper.) "I was standing 70 feet from President Kennedy when he was assassinated today and saw him fall under the bullet that killed him. Mrs. Jacqueline Kennedy threw herself over his body as the President's car speeded up as soon as the driver realized what had happened. The crowd began to scream and wail and people standing nearby began to throw their children on the ground for safety. I heard two shots. The first shot sounded like a firecracker and the President heard it. He turned to look, as did everyone else, and then the second shot sounded. This time the President fell. Then there was only chaos.
26
Hi James,

 My  Z frames are from the MPI DVD, I just brightened them up a little. 
I hope this frame 230 is what you need.


Best regards,
 Steve

 Z-230" border="0
Thank you for that. We see that Jack Kennedy is clearly hit and JC is looking forward, in no discomfort and still holding his hat in his right hand. That ties with the testimony of Nell and John Connally quite well when they said JC was hit two seconds after Kennedy.
27
A little late in the day but here's the Woodward article:

28
For those who don't know Dangerous Dan's tale, it's basically this: He was at some sort of military-killer conference. He was walking outside with another guy when a CIA guy called them over. Speaking to Dan, he said he wanted him to assassinate someone and actually gave him the name William Pitzer (catch that - gave him the name before Dan had accepted the mission!) When Dan learned this would be an assassination within the borders of the U.S. he declined, basically telling the CIA guy "The Mafia does internal hits for you." The CIA guy then approached Dan's companion, whom Dan assumed had carried out the Pitzer hit. Alas, the other guy (Vanek) was located, by Eaglesham I believe. He was a practicing physician who had no clue what Dan was talking about. Dan then started waffling and back-pedaling and declined to confront Vanek by telephone. OK, maybe it wasn't Vanek; he thought it was, but maybe it wasn't. Well, Vanek was 40 feet away from Dan's conversation with the CIA guy, so maybe be didn't hear it and maybe the CIA guy didn't actually approach Vanek. Well, maybe, well, maybe, well, maybe - until both Eaglesham and Heiner checked Dangerous Dan off their lists. Nevertheless, MTG believes Dangerous Dan was the real deal, and if you don't agree MTG hopes you fall off the edge of the earth next time you walk your pooch.
29
A second shooter that nobody saw and apparently didn't hit anybody or anything and whose bullets were never recovered.
No one saw the first shooter. There is no witness testimony that saw ANYONE with a rifle in Dealey Plaza apart from the SS agent carrying the M16 which wasn't discharged anyway.
The truth is, absolutely no one saw anyone point a rifle and shoot Jack Kennedy in Dealey Plaza, whether they be the first, second, third or 10th shooter. Oswald was found guilty of murder with dodgy forensic and circumstantial evidence alone.
30
I hope you didn't break your arm patting yourself on the back.

When I first saw the conversation she had at the Sixth Floor Museum, I was pleasantly surprised to discover she had a fairly accurate account of the JFKA. Thanks to Andrew Mason, I had been led to believe that her account was that JFK had been hit by the first shot. Then I come to find out that she clearly remembered hearing a shot that hadn't hit anybody (with the possible exception of Tague who she was unaware of at the time).
I never said that she recalled that JFK was hit by the first shot.  You seem to have a reading comprehension problem.

Anyone who read her DMN story knows that she said "Things are a little hazy from this point" (ie. after the first shot) but she did not think the first shot hit anyone. 

My point is that the location of JFK at the time of the first shot (after the president passed by where she was standing ie after he passed the lamp post, which he passed at z190) together with the last two shots being close together MEANS that JFK was struck by the first shot.  So her recollections of specific facts demonstrate that her hazy impression from what she did not see that led her to conclude that no one was struck by the first shot was incorrect and her specific recollections of what she did see together with the zfilm (which shows JFK reacting just after he passed by where she was standing and more than 5 seconds before the last shot) provide evidence that is inconsistent with a first missed shot.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10