Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
21
You have now claimed "NOBODY cares" to 2 different people. Try buying a vowel.

Dear Stormtrooper Storing,

Buy a bowel.

-- Tom
22
To be sure, there are plenty of farfetched JFKA CT's out there, mostly on the backdrop to the sordid event, and the subsequent cover-up. So, CT'ers often look nutty.

Furthermore, many JFKA CTs have become a platform for people to promote their ideological agendas.

OTOH, the second official investigation into the JFKA, the HSCA-1979, concluded there was a probability of JFKAC, and that likely there had been a gunshot at the GK, as the limo passed.

There were a lot of smart and skeptical guys on the HSCA, and plenty of professional staffers.

In this forum, we have JFKA buffs, hobbyists, rank amateurs and laymen insisting they know better than the HSCA. Well, maybe so, but I would put low odds on that.

Add on: It is a matter of public record that President LBJ told Earl Warren and Richard Russell that the WC could come to no conclusions that might trigger a nuke war with Russia---and that instruction did a snuff job on links from LHO back to Havana and Moscow. The whole Katzenbach memo idea.

Very early, the WC-FBI settled on the LNT, as directed by LBJ. The WC was not an investigation, but a fancy posthumous show trial or kangaroo court.

The CT'ers or LNT'ers are today still arguing theories---neither can prove their argument beyond reasonable doubt.

I concede I cannot prove my case for a small JFKA CT.

But, the weight of the last official investigation, the HSCA, leans towards the CT side of the fence.

That is the less-nutty view, as it stands now.

It's a real tragedy, because LNT'ers and CT'ers have different perps and gunsels . . . but, hey, at least the CT'ers all pretty much agree that some evil, evil, evil CIA'ers must have been involved!

23
[Royell Storing], remind me again why you believe all the footage has been altered.

Because Dan Rather, who got to watch the confusing Zapruder film on 11/25/63 only one time (and who, understandingly, didn't take notes while doing so), ran back to the broadcasting studio as fast as he could and proceeded to tell the whole nation that it showed (among other mistakes) "the limousine turning onto Elm Street."

LOL!
24
To be sure, there are plenty of farfetched JFKA CT's out there, mostly on the backdrop to the sordid event, and the subsequent cover-up. So, CT'ers often look nutty.

Furthermore, many JFKA CTs have become a platform for people to promote their ideological agendas.

OTOH, the second official investigation into the JFKA, the HSCA-1979, concluded there was a probability of JFKAC, and that likely there had been a gunshot at the GK, as the limo passed.

There were a lot of smart and skeptical guys on the HSCA, and plenty of professional staffers.

In this forum, we have JFKA buffs, hobbyists, rank amateurs and laymen insisting they know better than the HSCA. Well, maybe so, but I would put low odds on that.

Add on: It is a matter of public record that President LBJ told Earl Warren and Richard Russell that the WC could come to no conclusions that might trigger a nuke war with Russia---and that instruction did a snuff job on links from LHO back to Havana and Moscow. The whole Katzenbach memo idea.

Very early, the WC-FBI settled on the LNT, as directed by LBJ. The WC was not an investigation, but a fancy posthumous show trial or kangaroo court.

The CT'ers or LNT'ers are today still arguing theories---neither can prove their argument beyond reasonable doubt.

I concede I cannot prove my case for a small JFKA CT.

But, the weight of the last official investigation, the HSCA, leans towards the CT side of the fence.

That is the less-nutty view, as it stands now.



25
You obviously did Not hear what Trump actually said about the $5,000. Do NOT rely on, "The View", "Morning Joe" and the other Fake News Sources that spew the garbage that you are now repeating.  This $5,000, is Not a "handout". Trump described it as a "Dividend". Trump promised a "dividend" way back when he 1st imposed taxes on Canadian Goods.

LOL!
26
John Manchester...Deputy Sheriff...Clinton, Louisiana...

My point, exactly.
27
I don't understand the government handing out money. If the government could make people richer by handing out money, why stop at $5000. Why not give everybody a million dollars? Yes, people will have more dollars to spend but the dollars they have will be worth a lot less. We should have learned that from the Covid stimulus checks. That triggered the sky high inflation during the Biden years. The same thing will happen if Trump goes through with this. I can almost understand the first round of stimulus checks because the economy needed a jump start but the next two rounds were overkill. I didn't get excited about the Covid stimulus checks because I knew they wouldn't increase my buying power. Neither will this if they go through with it. Government handouts are just a way of making people feel better without doing a thing to improve their lives. The only way handing out $5000 to everyone makes sense would be if they offset it by cutting government spending in other areas and we know they aren't going to do that, no matter which party is in power.

    You obviously did Not hear what Trump actually said about the $5,000. Do NOT rely on, "The View", "Morning Joe" and the other Fake News Sources that spew the garbage that you are now repeating.  This $5,000, is Not a "handout". Trump described it as a "Dividend". Trump promised a "dividend" way back when he 1st imposed taxes on Canadian Goods.
28
From even the best copy of Weigman I can find and the best frame I can find, it's impossible to say whether or not Zapruder and Sitzman are on top of the pedestal. Zapruder is a black smudge against a black background and the footage is blurred and grainy.
To assert that all the film/photograph has been altered because you can't make out Zapruder in such poor quality footage is unrealistic.
If I come across better quality footage that shows, without question, that Zapruder is not on the pedestal during the Weigman footage I will concede something is seriously wrong. But I'm not anywhere near that.

Remind me again why you believe all the footage has been altered.

     I am challenging the Wiegman Film "TIME LINE". You immediately have knee jerked to alleging that I have claimed, ".... all the footage has been altered". This is simply Not  True.
     I am using the Wiegman Film copy on the Discovery Channel DVD, "Unsolved History JFK, Death in Dealey Plaza". Specifically, what Wiegman Film copy are you examining?   
29
   On a good copy of the Wiegman Film, (good being relative to the early Wiegman Film Copies), you can see the Pedestal, the Top of the Pedestal, and the concrete that we see Zapruder and Sitzman walking atop on Altgens 8. There is No Zapruder & No Sitzman in any of these areas on the Wiegman Film. Same goes for the Empty Shelter behind the pedestal. Zapruder and Sitzman are not on these Wiegman Film frames that show these areas. There's a couple of these frames when Wiegman was still physically on Elm St, and 2-3 good frames when Wiegman had physically moved onto the Knoll. This is before Wiegman filmed the Hesters. One of the guys that was wearing a shirt/jacket with the white trim that encircled the shoulder, is also filmed on the knoll. I believe this is 1 of the 2 guys we see on the Bell Film near/inside the shelter behind the Bench. (Time Stamp). The absence of Zapruder and Sitzman on these Wiegman Frames calls the current timeline assigned to the Wiegman Film into question. The same goes for the Bell Film timeline being Wrong. The Bell Film shows 2 guys wearing shirts with the shoulder trim inside the shelter behind the Bench.
   During the Josiah Thompson interview of Sitzman for "Six Seconds In Dallas", Sitzman said that the 1st thing she did after getting down from the Pedestal was to go down to the bottom of the Knoll to see what was going on. (paraphrasing). She said she talked with who she thought was a SS Agent down there. She then returned to the top of the knoll. Maybe Sitzman being at the bottom, or in the process of reaching the bottom of the Knoll, explains her absence from the Wiegman Film? Zapruder's absence? I don't know.

From even the best copy of Weigman I can find and the best frame I can find, it's impossible to say whether or not Zapruder and Sitzman are on top of the pedestal. Zapruder is a black smudge against a black background and the footage is blurred and grainy.
To assert that all the film/photograph has been altered because you can't make out Zapruder in such poor quality footage is unrealistic.
If I come across better quality footage that shows, without question, that Zapruder is not on the pedestal during the Weigman footage I will concede something is seriously wrong. But I'm not anywhere near that.

Remind me again why you believe all the footage has been altered.
30
Nobody cares.

   You have now claimed "NOBODY cares" to 2 different people. Try buying a vowel.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10