Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
21
Of course you do, because very few people understand and are able to explain the complexities of the Single Bullet Hypothesis, etc.

Let me guess, you are one of the few who do understand the Single Bullet Theory.... Pfff what a pathetic loser you truly are!
22
Should be easy to prove it then. Just ask Buell to confirm it. Beyond that, nobody cares who you claim to have eaten pizza with.

Btw; Frazier and/or the notary didn't know that Erwin was actually Irving?

And what was the notary's name exactly? The signature isn't very clear.

Surely you've heard Buell Frazier talk before, with that VERY strong accent.  The fact that the affidavit says "Erwin" instead of Irving should make it obvious to you that Frazier was talking as the transcriber was typing it out.  Use your common sense.

As for the pizza, my point was that we talked about the affidavit.  Out of respect for Dave Perry (Buell's friend and who set up the pizza night), I won't tell you what was said.  However, I had a video call with Perry last Monday and I'm trying to get Perry to agree to release the details of the conversation with Frazier.

This is what you'd call FREAL research, i.e. going straight to the horse's mouth (as opposed to doing what YOU do, which is simply call it fake and ignore it).
23
Like it or not, Frazier states, in the affidavit, that the rifle was in the bag and therefore by default he is telling you that the bag was large enough.

 :D "Frazier states..." lol
Or was it simply put in front of him to sign for additional color to the provenance of the car?
24
I do actually agree that today Oswald very likely would not be found guilty.

Of course you do, because very few people understand and are able to explain the complexities of the Single Bullet Hypothesis and realize that the HSCA's "Dictabelt Analysis" has been disproved, etc., etc.
25
Dear Martin "Useful Idiot" Weidmann,

You should have read the whole post.

GROK's saying Oswald would probably not be found guilty today will warm the cockles of your zombified heart.

-- Tom

I don't even know what or who GROK is. But even if I did, I couldn't care less. Unlike you, I am capable of thinking on my own.

And for what it is worth, I do actually agree that today Oswald very likely would not be found guilty.
26
ME: Would Lee Harvey Oswald have been convicted of assassinating JFK if his case had gone to trial?

In 1964, in Texas and with Henry Wade as prosecutor and the media proclaiming his guilt for months, the answer is: probably yes.

A far better question would be: would he get a fair trial in Texas? The answer to that is: probably not.

Dear Martin "Useful Idiot" Weidmann,

You should have read the whole post.

GROK's saying Oswald would probably not be found guilty today will warm the cockles of your zombified heart.

-- Tom

27
No one cares what or when you found anything.

Along with Frank Badalson, I had pizza with Buell Frazier and Dave Perry last November.  There's nothing fake about the affidavits.

Should be easy to prove it then. Just ask Buell to confirm it. Beyond that, nobody cares who you claim to have eaten pizza with.

Btw; Frazier and/or the notary didn't know that Erwin was actually Irving?

And what was the notary's name exactly? The signature isn't very clear.
28
ME: Would Lee Harvey Oswald have been convicted of assassinating JFK if his case had gone to trial?

ME: Would Lee Harvey Oswald have been convicted of assassinating JFK if his case had gone to trial?

In 1964, in Texas and with Henry Wade as prosecutor and the media proclaiming his guilt for months, the answer is: probably yes.

A far better question would be: would he get a fair trial in Texas? The answer to that is: probably not.
29
I found that "evidence" at the Ripley "believe or not" website years ago, but feel free to prove that the documents are authentic.

No one cares what or when you found anything.

Along with Frank Badalson, I had pizza with Buell Frazier and Dave Perry last November.  There's nothing fake about the affidavits.
30
Point being, in October of '64, Buell Frazier acknowledged that the assassination weapon was in the package and his car transported the rifle to the Depository building.  He even says that Oswald finalized his plans to carry out the assassination in that car.

Like it or not, Frazier states, in the affidavit, that the rifle was in the bag and therefore by default he is telling you that the bag was large enough.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10