21
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Darnell Gifs "Credit: 6th Floor Museum" Jones Collection NBC 5 Archive
« Last post by Brian Doyle on Yesterday at 04:31:36 PM »"SUGGESTED" leaving right away?? Witness is dismissed.
You seem to be having reality problems with the Couch/Darnell film confirming that 20 second leaving time...
22
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Darnell Gifs "Credit: 6th Floor Museum" Jones Collection NBC 5 Archive
« Last post by Royell Storing on Yesterday at 04:28:51 PM »
Their first day statements suggested leaving right away...Lovelady & Shelley knew they left the front steps 20 seconds after the shots...The films show it and therefore explain themselves...
You are making excuses...
"SUGGESTED" leaving right away?? Witness is dismissed.
23
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Anyone can fact check what this Ebay seller is saying?
« Last post by John Corbett on Yesterday at 02:54:11 PM »What i deciphered by looking at the listing is that he is probably selling two photos by Al Volkland, one of some car crash, and one copy of the famous photo of the motorcade speeding away from dealey plaza (Wish we had more film of that).
The master photo as far as i know belongs to the 6FM
For the latter, I might give him 75 cents for it, but only if it came with free shipping.
24
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Paul Landis And What He Said
« Last post by John Corbett on Yesterday at 02:52:45 PM »I think it would be accurate to say the hardcore JFK conspiracy crowd constitutes a cult. They cling to their beliefs with a religious fervor and demonize those who disagree with them. I'm not referring to the majority of people who believe in conspiracy because most of them are simply uninformed about the facts in the case and have had mostly the myths spewed at them for 6 decades. The ones who have studied the case in great detail and still maintain Oswald was innocent are the ones who comprise a cult. Even some of those who think Oswald was a participant in a grand conspiracy fall into that category.
25
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Anyone can fact check what this Ebay seller is saying?
« Last post by Matt Brooks on Yesterday at 02:48:00 PM »I don't know what it is but I wouldn't give him 75 cents for it.What i deciphered by looking at the listing is that he is probably selling two photos by Al Volkland, one of some car crash, and one copy of the famous photo of the motorcade speeding away from dealey plaza (Wish we had more film of that).
The master photo as far as i know belongs to the 6FM
26
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Paul Landis And What He Said
« Last post by Steve M. Galbraith on Yesterday at 02:43:11 PM »But this is what the Trine Day and Skyhorse publishing houses do. And use each others’ books as sources. Illegal !Conspiracy author "A" cites conspiracy author "B" for a claim. "B" cites conspiracy author "C" for his, i.e., "B's", claim.
“False in part, false in whole”
When challenged, conspiracy author "A" says he has two sources for his claim: source "B" and source "C". But he only has one, "C", and not two. And neither "A" or "B" check if the claim by "C" is accurate.
Multiply this by 60+ years and hundreds of conspiracy books and it's no wonder that people believe conspiracy nonsense.
Meanwhile, Fred Litwin repeatedly cites primary sources. He goes around the world finding them. He doesn't cite lone assassin books. He has the original documents. And the conspiracy crowd (not all but the most vocal) responds with temper tantrums and calls him names and wants him banned.
27
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Anyone can fact check what this Ebay seller is saying?
« Last post by John Corbett on Yesterday at 02:35:48 PM »I don't know what it is but I wouldn't give him 75 cents for it.
28
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Paul Landis And What He Said
« Last post by John Corbett on Yesterday at 02:34:12 PM »What would be even worse is if he was manipulated by a CT ambulance chaser who took advantage of his enfeebled state of mind.
There's probably a good deal of truth to that statement.
CTs have searched for almost 63 years to find credible evidence that someone other than Oswald was responsible for the JFKA and have come up empty. It's not surprising they have to resort to manufactured evidence to make their case.
29
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Paul Landis And What He Said
« Last post by Mark A. Oblazney on Yesterday at 02:04:28 PM »What would be even worse is if he was manipulated by a CT ambulance chaser who took advantage of his enfeebled state of mind.
30
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: 11.22 FBI Memo About an Secret Service Agent Finding a Bullet in the Limo
« Last post by John Corbett on Yesterday at 01:25:29 PM »Landis's report, dated on 11/30, of his 11/22 activities. On page 7 he describes no opportunity, back at Andrews, after disembarking and escorting Mrs. Kennedy, to be near the limousine again on 11/22.
Landis' story was that he found the bullet at Parkland and put it on JFK's stretcher which makes no sense. Of course he wouldn't have been one of the agents who searched the limo. He was assigned to Jackie who went to Bethesda and the limo was sent to the White House garage to be searched for evidence. It's amazing how anyone could believe what Landis said in 2023.
Recent Posts