JFK Assassination Forum

Back for a second for bit of fun;

You posted this, right;

I didn't know how to post images on this forum, but I've had some help, so here is the evidence that you said didn't exist.



 

Consider yourself schooled!

OK. I was wrong. You didn't make this up. You just lied about it. Earlier, you stated:

"The fact remains that Frazier passed the test and that was enough to cause massive panic by Lt Day"

Please point out anything in either document you posted that Day exhibited "massive panic". Sounds like Day's reaction was rather matter of fact.

It has been stated a number of times on in this thread and others that Oswald's palm print was on the middle of the paper bag found in the sniper's nest. That didn't sound right to me but because I hadn't dealt directly with this issue in at least five years, I left that claim go unchallenged. After going to the WCR to check it out, I find that my memory was correct. The palm print was on the bottom of the bag.

From page 135 of the WCR:
"Oswald's fingerprint and palmprint found on bag.--Using a standard chemical method involving silver nitrates 180 the FBI Laboratory developed a latent palmprint and latent fingerprint on the bag. (See app. X, p. 565.) Sebastian F. Latona, supervisor of the FBI's Latent Fingerprint Section, identified these prints as the left index fingerprint and right palmprint of Lee Harvey Oswald.181 The portion of the palm which was identified was the heel of the right palm, i.e., the area near the wrist, on the little finger side.182 These prints were examined independently by Ronald G. Wittmus of the FBI,183 and by Arthur Mandella, a fingerprint expert with the New York City Police Department. 184 Both concluded that the prints were the right palm and left index finger of Lee Oswald. No other identifiable prints were found on the bag.185

Oswald's palmprint on the bottom of the paper bag indicated, of course, that he had handled the bag. Furthermore, it was consistent with the bag having contained a heavy or bulky object when he handled it since a light object is usually held by the fingers.186 The palmprint was found on the closed end of the bag. It was from Oswald's right hand, in which he carried the long package as he walked from Frazier's car to the building.187"

The palm print at the bottom of the bag is consistent with the way Frazier said Oswald carried the bag, cupped in his right hand. In providing this cite, I have done something Martin Wiedmann has consistently refused to do. I have provided corroboration for a portion of Frazier's statement regarding how Oswald carried the bag. Frazier's description of how Oswald carred the bag was half right. That's more than we can say for Marty.

If you want me to reply to this mess, clean up the post.

On second thought don't even bother. I am not wasting my time in going over the same lies and assumptions every time.

All this constant BS about "logical inference" when it is in fact a mere assumption, the BS about "matching" fibers, the idiotic conclusions based on "common sense" claims and massive lies, like that the paper bag was not folded up when it was found (when the WC actually said it was) and your bogus claim that I consider the polygraph as evidence that Frazier accurately recalled the length of the package (when in fact he told to truth about how he saw Oswald carry in the cup of his hand and under his armpit) is more enough for me to conclude that you are a complete idiot who couldn't tell the truth if it saved his life. We're done.

I accept your surrender.

I was wondering when the childish crap would start. I obviously expected it as it is usually at the moment when you get stuck.

Old school LN temper tantrums are still around.... Hilarious!