The Real Face Of The Real Babushka Lady

Original B/W

Colourised

The Face - Enlarged And Colourised

The Babushka Lady Is Not The Late Beverley Oliver

    Whatever her ID might be, whatever happened to the image(s) this lady snapped off? That should be the center of the discussion surrounding this lady. The other stuff has always been pure misdirection.

[...]

Dear Comrade Stormtrooper Storing,

You're just trolling out of desperation, as usual.

ME: Describe the difference between a "startle" reaction to the sounds of an unexpected and nearby gunshot and the typical conscious/voluntary response to said sounds. Are they equally noticeable to an outside observer? Is it plausible that it would take someone 1.0 seconds to exhibit the latter? Provide sources.

Perplexity AI: A startle reaction is an immediate, brief, involuntary flinch — blink, shoulder hunch, or downward head dip — and may be subtle to an outside observer. The later conscious/voluntary reaction is usually more noticeable because it often involves turning the head horizontally to locate or assess the sound, rather than merely ducking. It is plausible that a person would take 1.0 seconds to show that conscious, voluntary head-turning response to an unexpected nearby gunshot. Although it does not prove that an unexpected nearby gunshot normally produces a one-second voluntary head turn, a peer-reviewed Vehicle System Dynamics article reports estimated mean reaction times of 0.7 seconds for expected events and 1.0 second for unexpected events in a driving/human-factors context. That supports the general proposition that a one-second perception-and-response interval is plausible when a person must respond to an unanticipated event rather than execute a prepared response. The gunshot-specific evidence remains lacking, but it provides a defensible analogy: surprise adds perception and decision time, and a one-second voluntary response is within a peer-reviewed estimate for unexpected-event reaction time.

Startle Reaction Versus Conscious/Voluntary Response to an Unexpected Nearby Gunshot

A sudden, unexpected, nearby gunshot is capable of eliciting an acoustic startle response: a rapid, involuntary defensive reaction distinct from a later conscious, voluntary, or directionally selected action. The two may overlap in time, but they should not be treated as the same event.

The startle reflex is a largely automatic, brainstem-mediated response to an abrupt, intense stimulus. In humans, its physical manifestations may include an eyeblink; contraction of facial, neck, and other skeletal muscles; flexion or withdrawal of the limbs; shoulder/trunk shrugging; head/neck movement; and autonomic changes such as increased heart rate or sweating. These elements are often broadly distributed rather than precisely directed toward determining the source of the sound. Startle is variable: it may be subtle, may consist only of a blink or brief neck-muscle activity, or may be a conspicuous defensive movement involving the head, shoulders, arms, or trunk.

In contrast, a conscious or voluntary reaction is a selected, goal-directed action. For example, a person may turn his head or body toward a sound to localize it, look toward an apparent threat, duck, seek cover, or begin another chosen response. Its form depends on what the person perceives, what response he selects, his posture and readiness, and the circumstances. It is therefore not accurate to assume that all voluntary reactions will be conspicuous or that they will always be more conspicuous than startle. A small, partial head turn may be less visible than a pronounced defensive startle; conversely, a blink or minor neck movement may be much less visible than a clear head or torso turn.

Peer-reviewed experiments distinguish these phenomena. In a study of human head rotations, Oude Nijhuis et al. found that a startling acoustic stimulus produced neck-muscle activity at about 60–64 milliseconds. In “startle-only” trials, observable head movements occurred in only 27 percent of trials; when present, those movements were small and began at a mean of approximately 166 milliseconds. In non-startle choice-reaction trials requiring a directionally selected head rotation, average head-movement onset was about 403 milliseconds. Thus, the study distinguishes rapid startle-linked muscle activity, sometimes accompanied by small head movement, from a later task-directed and directionally specified head turn.

Similarly, Siegmund, Inglis, and Sanderson studied prepared voluntary head flexion and rotation under startling and non-startling conditions. In relaxed startle-control trials, head-acceleration onset averaged approximately 58 milliseconds. In contrast, ordinary voluntary reaction-time head movements to a non-startling signal began later; in their head-rotation experiment, acceleration onset was approximately 129 milliseconds for the normal reaction-time tone and about 64 milliseconds when a startling stimulus was used. The researchers concluded that a startling sound can produce an early startle response while also accelerating a movement that was already prepared to be made. This study supports a distinction between reflexive startle activity and voluntary movement, but it does not model an unprepared bystander deciding how to respond to an actual gunshot.

The available research does not support a categorical assertion that a conscious or voluntary head turn normally begins one full second after a nearby unexpected gunshot. The principal head-rotation experiments involved instructed and, importantly, prepared laboratory movements; their movement onsets were substantially below one second. Nonetheless, a one-second interval is plausible for a more complex, unprepared perception-and-response sequence in which a person must register an unexpected event, interpret it, select a response, and then visibly execute that response. In a peer-reviewed vehicle human-factors study, Wanner et al. reported estimated mean reaction times of 0.7 seconds for expected events and 1.0 second for unexpected events. That finding is an analogy, not gunshot-specific evidence: it supports the proposition that an unexpected event can produce an approximately one-second mean response interval in a complex real-world task, but it does not establish a typical one-second latency for voluntary head turning after gunfire.

A gunfire-related law-enforcement simulation also shows why timing terminology must be precise. Kantor et al. reported that 20 of 22 officers exhibited visible startle reactions during an unexpected lethal-force scenario, including neck flexion and arm-shielding movements. The study reported a mean startle-response duration of 0.78 ± 0.41 seconds. That figure does not mean that startle began 0.78 seconds after the stimulus; it means that the visible startle movement, once initiated, lasted about that long on average. The same study reported an average firearm-draw time of 1.27 ± 0.47 seconds during the surprise-threat trial, compared with 0.91 ± 0.11 seconds in a control trial.

Accordingly, the most supportable conclusion is that a startle reaction and a voluntary reaction differ principally in timing, automaticity, and movement pattern. Startle is generally rapid, involuntary, defensive, and often broadly distributed across facial, neck, shoulder, arm, and trunk musculature. A voluntary reaction is selected and goal-directed, such as orienting toward the sound, looking at a perceived threat, or taking cover. Whether either reaction is more visible to an outside observer depends on its particular physical expression, the observer’s viewing angle, the subject’s posture, clothing, image quality, and the timing and framing of the recording. The research supports the plausibility of a one-second interval for some complex unanticipated responses, but does not establish one second as a typical or necessary delay before a voluntary head turn toward gunfire.

Sources

Oude Nijhuis, L. B., et al. (2007). “Choice reaction times for human head rotations are shortened by startling acoustic stimuli, irrespective of stimulus direction.” The Journal of Physiology, 584(Pt. 1), 97–109. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.136291.

Siegmund, G. P., Inglis, J. T., & Sanderson, D. J. (2001). “Startle response of human neck muscles sculpted by readiness to perform ballistic head movements.” The Journal of Physiology, 535(Pt. 1), 289–300. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.00289.x.

Wanner, D., et al. (2014). “Fault classification method for the driving safety of intelligent vehicles.” Vehicle System Dynamics, 52(sup1). DOI: 10.1080/00423114.2014.889317.

Kantor, M., Bartz, D. E., Lewinski, W. J., & Pettitt, R. W. (2023). “Startle Response and Firearm Draw Performance in Law Enforcement Officers during a Lethal Force Simulated Domestic Assault.” Journal of Forensic Biomechanics, 14, 430. DOI: 10.35248/2090-2697.23.14.430.

Zhang, Y., et al. (2022). “Research Progress in the Study of Startle Reflex to Disease States.” Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 18, 401–413. DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S351667. This review is useful for the general physical manifestations of human startle: eye blinking, limb flexion, trunk shrugging, and autonomic symptoms.