No, I simply choose not to waste more time posting additional replies to people who've made it clear they have no intention of being credible and accurate in dealing with evidence that refutes their theory. I've provided evidence to back up my argument, and you guys just refuse to acknowledge it but issue all kinds of vacuous denials and evasions.
Wrong. We refuse to accept your FUBAR analysis of the evidence.
This is the kind of nonsense I'm talking about. The SBT was disproved long before Fetzer came along. And, Weldon, Mantik, Schaeffer, Horne, etc., broke with Fetzer years ago, after he started peddling the 9/11 Truther craziness.
A perfect example of your FUBAR analysis. You also have a fondness for citing other people as kooky as your are.
In addition, the eight witnesses in three different locations who said they saw a bullet hole in the windshield have nothing to do with any "Fetzerite buddies."
The Secret Service who were able to closely examine the windshield the night of the assassination determined the windshield had been hit by a missile (fragment}
and had not passed through the windshield.
And you wonder why I don't keep posting replies to your ilk after posting several replies in which I document the very evidence you claim doesn't exist. Does "the MPI large-format version of the Zapruder film" ring a bell? The only answer that any of your ilk gave on this point was Mitch Todd's claim that the apparent windshield damage is really just a "specular highlight."
The problems is not the evidence. It's your silly interpretation of it that show no capacity for critical thinking. You just parrot stale old CT dogma that has long been refurted.
It is just comical that you would get on a public board and pretend to have any credibility while in the same breath arguing that the SBT has not been disproven. Ever after the ARRB disclosures about the absolute, visually confirmed no-exit determination at the autopsy, and even after Knott Lab's 2023 SBT trajectory analysis, the most sophisticated and data-intensive analysis ever done, refuted the SBT, you guys still cling to it.
The SBT stands as the only plausible explanation for JFK's non-fatal wounds and all of JBC's wounds, despite futile attempts to invalidate it.