11
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Larry Hancock Tips His Hat To KGB Suspects
« Last post by Benjamin Cole on Today at 12:52:15 AM »LP-
Sure, official KGB and Khruschev may not have been involved in the JFKA (although James Woolsey, a former CIA director, thinks they were. You do not. Woolsey has street cred up the wazoo.)
Setting aside Woolsey...there are always lower-level factions at work in any large organization.
I lean more to G2 involvement.
Obviously, LHO was capable of the JFKA---see LNT theorizing, much of which holds water.
So why wouldn't G2'ers graft LHO into an ad hoc, informal JFKA plan?
They got lucky. JFK was coming to Dallas, to ride in a motorcade in front of LHO's perch.
At bottom, there is no way a lone gunsel armed with a single-shot-per-bolt-action rifle got a shot off at Z-295, and then one at Z-313. Let alone the GK smoke-and-bang show.
Who were LHO's most likely confederates?
Sure, official KGB and Khruschev may not have been involved in the JFKA (although James Woolsey, a former CIA director, thinks they were. You do not. Woolsey has street cred up the wazoo.)
Setting aside Woolsey...there are always lower-level factions at work in any large organization.
I lean more to G2 involvement.
Obviously, LHO was capable of the JFKA---see LNT theorizing, much of which holds water.
So why wouldn't G2'ers graft LHO into an ad hoc, informal JFKA plan?
They got lucky. JFK was coming to Dallas, to ride in a motorcade in front of LHO's perch.
At bottom, there is no way a lone gunsel armed with a single-shot-per-bolt-action rifle got a shot off at Z-295, and then one at Z-313. Let alone the GK smoke-and-bang show.
Who were LHO's most likely confederates?
Recent Posts
but man, you abuse it all day long. I'll just leave it at that.