Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10
11
After 62 years of research, all the CTs have to show for it is a pile of loose ends.


Neither Mike Majerus or Jack Nessan seem to be CTs. Their theory that there were only two shots fired does seem to have substantial and reasonable evidence to back it up. But for me that theory would be much more credible if CE 543 did show signs of being struck more than once by the firing pin. So far I haven’t found anything to support Dr. Chapman’s claim.
12
Maybe you're a closet Fascist, and that's why you cherish "former" KGB counterintelligence officer Vladimir Putin and the traitorous orange turd he installed as our "president" on 20 January 2017 and 20 January 2025.

TDS and PDS rolled into a single sentence.

You seem to be at state 5 of both ailments.
13
It drives me nuts when I cannot nail something down. At Steve Duffy's "JFK Assassination Index" blog, the entry for Chapman refers to "Re Access to Autopsy Materials by Dr. E. Forrest Chapman" as though this is a document. The citation is to "JFK Collection List, pg. 27 (AMKW 65)." AMKW is a three-part collection of documents compiled by indefatigable researcher Anna Marie Kuhns-Walko following the 1992 document release. AMKW 65 would be document 65 in that collection. Discussions in the 1990s say the collection is "marketed commercially by such organizations as JFK/Lancer" and is "easily accessible" - but darned if I can find it.

At the MFF website, I found a reference to the Rockefeller Commission Report that quotes Chapman as saying in a telephone interview that if there were GK shooters they must have been very poor shots because they missed everything. MFF also has the AMKW 65 reference but apparently not the document.

It sounds like Chapman was closely aligned with Cyril Wecht and mostly shared his views. With that, I think I've reached a dead end.
14
:D now you're a doctor?

Does it take a doctor to know that AI is a questionable research tool?
15
Another example of PDS.

If the Epstein files had anything damaging to Trump, Biden's puppet masters would definitely have leaked them in October of 2024. The one politician most likely to have been tarred by the Epstein files was Bill Clinton and leaking that material would not have helped Kamala. Of course, she was such a loseer, I doubt anything could have helped her.

I'd love to see Kamala nominated again in 2028, with AOC as her running mate, but I doubt even the Dems are that dumb. The Dems have found a winning formula. Nominate a far left socialist and have them run as a moderate Democrat, then after they get elected they show their true colors. I don't think they could pull that off if the pick Kamala again.

Maybe you're a closet Fascist, and that's why you cherish "former" KGB counterintelligence officer Vladimir Putin and the traitorous orange turd he installed as our "president" on 20 January 2017 and 20 January 2025. 
16
Fantastic story.  This gets better and better.  There was a direct line of sight between the shooter and Trump.  So what "broken piece of something" do you think hit his right ear while he is standing?  If you want to believe that "shrapnel" from the bullet hit him, that is a distinction without any apparent difference.   The TDS mind won't allow Trump to have miraculously survived an attempt on his life and behaved heroically.  There is a firewall in the TDS programming that prohibits just acknowledging the obvious.

I'm not the first to say that if Trump found a cure for cancer, the lefties would find fault with it.

They'd probably accuse him of trying to bankrupt Social Security, which a cure for cancer would almost certainly do. It would blow all the actuarial tables out of the water.   
17
It looks like this is destined to be yet another JFKA loose end. You would think that Chapman's claim would have been a bombshell that would have generated more discussion than it did and led to further examination of CE 543. It seems like the basic issue is simply "Does CE 543 show evidence of having been struck with a firing pin more than once?"

The newspaper article I linked said Chapman was "recently interviewed" by the HSCA, but I didn't find anything relating to that. The HSCA firearms panel report deals with the "dent" issue but not really the "firing pin" issue.

After 62 years of research, all the CTs have to show for it is a pile of loose ends.
18
It looks like this is destined to be yet another JFKA loose end. You would think that Chapman's claim would have been a bombshell that would have generated more discussion than it did and led to further examination of CE 543. It seems like the basic issue is simply "Does CE 543 show evidence of having been struck with a firing pin more than once?"

The newspaper article I linked said Chapman was "recently interviewed" by the HSCA, but I didn't find anything relating to that. The HSCA firearms panel report deals with the "dent" issue but not really the "firing pin" issue.


Agreed, also there were other firearms experts that verified the FBI’s conclusions, etc. As far as I know, none of them indicated anything either.
19
It looks like this is destined to be yet another JFKA loose end. You would think that Chapman's claim would have been a bombshell that would have generated more discussion than it did and led to further examination of CE 543. It seems like the basic issue is simply "Does CE 543 show evidence of having been struck with a firing pin more than once?"

The newspaper article I linked said Chapman was "recently interviewed" by the HSCA, but I didn't find anything relating to that. The HSCA firearms panel report deals with the "dent" issue but not really the "firing pin" issue.
20
Chapman died at age 60 (nothing mysterious) in 1991. I see that much of the conspiracy literature describes him as a "forensic scientist," perhaps to disguise that his expertise was medical (he was a medical examiner and pathologist). However, I did find one newspaper article describing him as an expert in ballistics. He was not a fan of the Magic Bullet, referring to it as "utter rubbish" (https://www.archives.gov/files/research/rfk/releases/2025/0612/00419462_newspaper_articles_concer_104-10068-10053.pdf).

There seems to be remarkably little discussion of his claims regarding CE 543. Michael Kurtz, in Crime of the Century, claimed that CE 557, an FBI test shell, confirmed Chapman's claims: "The F.B.I. also reproduced the effect. Commission Exhibit 557 is a test cartridge case, fired empty from Oswald's rifle by the F.B.I. for ballistics comparison purposes. It, too, contains the dent in the lip and deep primer impression similar to Case 543." (557 can't be right. He must be referring to 559, which is what Charles has posted. https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0138b.htm.)



Here’s a snippet from Robert Frazuer’s WC testimony. CE 557 is a photograph of the only two test cartridges used for identification comparison purposes. So far, Frazier doesn’t say anything about dry-firing one of them. And I cannot imagine that they would want to dry-fire one of them. My guess is than one was intended to be a backup for the other one in case something bad happened to one of them.


Mr. EISENBERG - After receiving the cartridge cases, did you examine them to determine whether they had been fired in Commission Exhibit 139?
Mr. FRAZIER - Yes, sir.
Mr. EISENBERG - When did you make the examinations?
Mr. FRAZIER - On the dates I mentioned, that is, November 23, 1963, and November 27, 1963.
Mr. EISENBERG - And what were your conclusions, Mr. Frazier?
Mr. FRAZIER - I found all three of the cartridge cases had been fired in this particular weapon.
Mr. EISENBERG - Can you describe the examination which you conducted to reach these conclusions?
Mr. FRAZIER - The first step was to fire test cartridge cases in this rifle to pick up the microscopic marks which are left on all cartridge cases fired in this weapon by the face of the bolt. Then those, test cartridge cases were mounted on a comparison microscope, on the right-hand side, and on the left-hand side of the comparison microscope was mounted one of the three submitted cartridge cases, so that you could magnify the surfaces of the test and the evidence and compare the marks left on the cartridge cases by the belt face and the firing pin of the rifle.

(At this point, Mr. McCloy left the hearing room.)

Mr. EISENBERG - I now hand you two cartridge cases, and ask you whether you can identify these cartridge cases?
Mr. FRAZIER - Yes, sir; these are the two cartridge cases we fired for test purposes in Exhibit 139.
Mr. EISENBERG - Do they have your mark on them?
Mr. FRAZIER - Yes, they do.
Mr. EISENBERG - Commissioner Boggs, may I introduce these as 557?
Representative BOGGS - They may be admitted.


(The items referred to were marked Commission Exhibit No. 557 for identification and received in evidence.)

Mr. EISENBERG - These were the only two cartridge cases fired as tests in Exhibit 139--as tests for the purpose of identification of the cartridge cases which you examined before, 543, 544, and 545?
Mr. FRAZIER - Yes, sir; these two were used in those tests.
There were many other cartridge cases fired, but not for that purpose.


Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10