Recent Posts

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10
11
Yep, the Police tapes were synchronized with the Hertz clock at 12:30 and some CT's claim that somehow the Police tapes went out of sync by somewhere around 5 to 10 minutes in the next 3/4 of an hour, and the more desperate CT zealots claim that the Hertz clock which people set their own timepieces by was not accurate, but not one CT has ever proved that the Hertz clock was even a minute out, much less 5 or more!  :D



JohnM
12

#5 makes no sense. The sound of a high powered rifle at 90 yards is going to be plenty loud. It resulted in a jiggle 7-8 frames after the second shot and another 7-8 frames after the third shot. I see no reason why it would not have caused a jiggle on the first shot.

The problem is Zapruder never mentions hearing any sound for a first shot, anything to cause a jiggle. He said he heard two shots not three. Wouldn't he have heard the shot that caused the first jiggle?

So you believe he heard a shot that caused a jiggle even though he said he never heard one?

His WC testimony:
Mr. ZAPRUDER - Well, as the car came in line almost--I believe it was almost in line. I was standing up here and I was shooting through a telephoto lens, which is a zoom lens and as it reached about--I imagine it was around here--I heard the first shot and I saw the President lean over and grab himself like this (holding his left chest area).
Mr. LIEBELER - Grab himself on the front of his chest?
Mr. ZAPRUDER - Right---something like that. In other words, he was sitting like this and waving and then after the shot he just went like that.
Mr. LIEBELER - He was sitting upright in the car and you heard the shot and you saw the President slump over?
Mr. ZAPRUDER - Leaning--leaning toward the side of Jacqueline. For a moment I thought it was, you know, like you say, "Oh, he got me," when you hear a shot--you've heard these expressions and then I saw---I don't believe the President is going to make jokes like this, but before I had a chance to organize my mind, I heard a second shot and then I saw his head opened up and the blood and everything came out and I started--I can hardly talk about it [ the witness crying].

He said he heard the shot that caused JFK to "grab himself" (the first shot he heard) and then he heard the shot that killed JFK (the second shot he heard). Two shots. But nothing about any shots prior to that.




13
MTG--

But what are the links between LHO and the Mob?

David Ferrie was a Marcello operative. Oswald had relatives who were in the Mafia. There is decent evidence Oswald and Ruby knew each other, and Ruby had all kinds of Mafia ties. However, I don't think the Mafia was controlling Oswald. I think the Mafia's main role was killing Oswald and aiding in the cover-up in Dallas, New Orleans, and Miami.

Senator Schweiker was correct when he said "the fingerprints of intelligence" are all around LHO.

LHO in Atsugi, then considered an asset by the KGB chief in Minsk, then meeting with KGB'ers in MC, possibly with G-2'ers in MC, and in N.O. In N.O., LHO appeared to be under CIA surveillance.

Oswald was an intelligence operative, at the very least. He was definitely working in intelligence in the Marine Corps. I think it's obvious he was a false defector. 

On the Mob side, Lee Harvey Oswald’s uncle in New Orleans was Charles "Dutz" Murret. But there is no indication LHO became "mobbed up." There is no history of LHO running Mob errands, smuggling for the Mob, etc.

Murret, plus Ferrie and Ruby. But, yes, I agree that he was not a Mafia asset.

Blakey was a smart guy, but he was also a lifelong mob-hunter, the author of the RICO act. Do you think that biased Blakey?

But remember that Blakey completely changed his mind about possible CIA involvement in 2014, after he learned how badly the CIA had misled the HSCA. See his 2014 statement “The HSCA and the CIA: The View from the Top."

Quote
Quote from: Lance Payette:
But wait, Ruby didn't get the job done until Oswald had been in custody and under intense interrogation for hours and hours. If Ruby had shot Oswald on Friday night, when he had an opportunity, we might at least have something to talk about. But he didn't.

This is what happens when you deign to try to engage on the evidence.

Ruby started stalking Oswald on Friday night. Gee, why do you suppose he did that? He was supposed to shoot Oswald on Friday night when Oswald was talking with reporters. He was in the room and had a gun on him, but he backed out. Later, he tried to warn the DPD that Oswald would be killed, but they ignored him. The HSCA concluded that Ruby lied about his whereabouts that weekend, lied about how he entered the basement, and lied about why he killed Oswald. The HSCA's polygraph experts found indications that Ruby was lying on his polygraph when he denied aiding Oswald in the assassination:

In fact, the reactions to the preceding question--(Did you assist Oswald in the assassination?)--showed the largest valid GSR [galvanic skin response] reaction in test series No. 1. In addition, there is a constant suppression of breathing and a rise in blood pressure at the time of this crucial relevant question. From this test, it appeared to the panel that Ruby was possibly lying when answering "no" to the question, "Did you assist Oswald in the assassination?" This is contrary to Herndon's opinion that Ruby was truthful when answering that question. (8 HSCA 217-218)

Ruby was a nervous wreck before he heard that Oswald had died. He was visibly relieved when he heard the news of Oswald's death. Clearly, Ruby was worried about the consequences if Oswald lived.

Two documents released in 2017 reveal that Ruby knew about the assassination in advance and that he was in Dealey Plaza during the shooting. The documents reveal that shortly before the shooting, Ruby invited a man named Bob Vanderslice to watch JFK’s motorcade with him and to “watch the fireworks.” Ruby did not know that Vanderslice was an informant for the Intelligence Division of the Dallas office of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). When Vanderslice saw news reports in early 1977 that the HSCA was going to reinvestigate the JFK assassination, he decided he should tell his IRS contact about the incident, and he did so in February.

The following month, March 1977, the chief of the Dallas IRS Intelligence Division sent a memo about Vanderslice’s account to the Dallas FBI office. An FBI agent from the Dallas FBI office interviewed the IRS agent who had spoken with Vanderslice. The Dallas FBI office then sent a detailed report on the matter to FBI HQ. Here is part of the Dallas FBI report on the incident:

Vanderslice told him [Vanderslice’s Intelligence Division contact] that on the morning of the assassination, Jack Ruby called him on the telephone and asked him if he would like to go to the Presidential Parade with him, and if he would like to “watch the fireworks.” Vanderslice said that he was with Jack Ruby and standing at the corner of the Postal Annex Building facing the Texas School Book Depository building at the time of the shooting. Immediately after the shooting, Ruby left and headed toward the area of the Dallas Morning News building, without saying anything to him.

The Dallas FBI report noted that the IRS agent said Vanderslice was a reliable informant. The report also noted that Vanderslice’s undercover work involved gathering info on the “criminal element” in Dallas, and that he had known one of Jack Ruby’s nightclub strippers.




14
Not all of us have your psychic power to know what JBC's brain is doing in moving his arm there.  Even JBC himself didn't know. He thought it was because he was turning before he was hit by the bullet he felt. But maybe he didn't have your gift.

I don't need psychic power to figure that JBC was reacting to his right arm being struck in the wrist when his arm suddenly flipped up in the air at precisely the same instant JFK's arms suddenly flipped up in reaction to having been hit by the same bullet that struck JBC's wrist. All I need to do is apply common sense to figure out the obvious reason for this.
15
That's because you, like most Americans, don't know jack you-know-what about them.

https://archive.org/details/SpyWarsMolesMysteriesAndDeadlyGames

I'm glad I don't know the things you fantasize.
16
I already did - a forensic analysis of the Z-film

1] Oswald wasn't tracking anything as he wasn't in the SN at the time of the shooting
2] The shooter was fully aware of the tree, it didn't 'suddenly come into view'  ::)
3] The shooter had visualised the open space just beyond the tree as the 'kill zone'.  The limo would be at it's straightest from his POV, with minimal lateral movement.
4] Read through "The First Shot" thread to familiarise yourself with this issue rather than just swallow the WC Report down hook, line and sinker.
5] If the sound of the shots was so distant it would not have created any Jiggle for anyone to Analyse. That's the importance of Sitzman's observation. Jiggle Analysis is meaningless for the Z-film.

I don't even know what to make with #1. Is it your theory that Oswald brought his rifle into the TSBD in the rifle bag with his palm and fingerprint on the bottom of the bag, assembled it for someone else to use, placing his palm print on the underside of the barrel in the process, then handed it over for someone else to use to shoot JFK and before he left, he pressed the butt of the rifle against his shirt to deposit fibers from it and also planted a few of his fingerprints on top of the boxes stacked by the window. If Oswald was a patsy, he had to be the most cooperative patsy ever because he did so many things that made him look guilty.

I will never understand why CTs feel compelled to reach for the most convoluted explanations imaginable to explain the evidence rather than just accept the simplest, most straight forward explanation that the reason for the evidence being what it was, is that Oswald smuggled the rifle into work to use it to kill JFK.
Quote

As for #2, if the shooter was going to try to get off a shot before JFK ducked under the tree, he would have started tracking his target as soon as the limo made the turn onto Elm. That would have created tunnel vision. He was probably hoping to get a clear shot at JFK before the tree came into play but when the branches appeared in his scope, it's not hard to imagine he would rush the shot, possibly contributing to the bad miss.

I agree with #3 but I also believe Oswald wanted to give himself an extra chance by taking the difficult early shot. Even if that shot only had a 10% chance of landing, that's a better shot than not taking the shot at all.

As for #4, I've been familiarizing myself with all the issues regarding the JFKA for 35 years. I really don't need some CT explaining them to me.

#5 makes no sense. The sound of a high powered rifle at 90 yards is going to be plenty loud. It resulted in a jiggle 7-8 frames after the second shot and another 7-8 frames after the third shot. I see no reason why it would not have caused a jiggle on the first shot.
17
MTG--

But what are the links between LHO and the Mob?

Senator Schweiker was correct when he said "the fingerprints of intelligence" are all around LHO.

LHO in Atsugi, then considered an asset by the KGB chief in Minsk, then meeting with KGB'ers in MC, possibly with G-2'ers in MC, and in N.O. In N.O., LHO appeared to be under CIA surveillance.

On the Mob side, Lee Harvey Oswald’s uncle in New Orleans was Charles "Dutz" Murret. But there is no indication LHO became "mobbed up."

There is no history of LHO running Mob errands, smuggling for the Mob, etc.

Blakey was a smart guy, but he was also a lifelong mob-hunter, the author of the RICO act.

Do you think that biased Blakey?




18
If the motorcycle with the stuck open mike was not at the required location at the time required, the timing of impulses or cross talk is irrelevant. The photographic evidence shows no motorcycle as required by the acoustics evidence.

Not true. I would refer you to Dr. Donald Thomas's extensive research on this issue. The photographic evidence is not a complete, second-by-second record of the events in Dealey Plaza, but Dr. Thomas makes a strong case that McClain was in the right position to have been in position to record the sounds on the dictabelt.

The Dealey Plaza site test done by the BBN scientists proved that the dictabelt was recorded during the assassination. Even the NRC/NAS panel concluded there was a 93% chance that the timing-movement correlations identified by the BBN scientists between the dictabelt impulses and the test-firing impulses occurred because the dictabelt was recorded during the assassination.

Have you read the HSCA materials on the acoustical evidence? How about Dr. Josiah Thompson's extensive discussion on the new developments from new research into the acoustical evidence done at BBN in 2019-2020 in his 2021 book Last Second in Dallas? His two chapters and appendices on the acoustical evidence total 114 pages. Dr. Thompson also spends considerable time on the issue of which patrol bike's mic recorded the impulse patterns on the dictabelt--he, too, makes a strong case that McClain's mic recorded those sounds.

And if you go on to claim the photographic evidence was altered, then acoustic evidence is still meaningless because the impulses were matched to the Zapruder film.

This is an overstatement and an oversimplification. There was disagreement among the HSCA experts about matching the gunshot impulses with events in the Zapruder film. Furthermore, as I have explained in other threads, the dictabelt did not necessarily record all of the shots fired in Dealey Plaza for two possible reasons: shots could have been fired several feet away from a window and/or a silencer could have been used. The acoustical scientists noted that if a gunman fired 6-8 feet back from a window, the dictabelt probably would not have recorded the sound.

Also, we need to keep in mind that because of restrictions imposed by the committee, the BBN test firing in Dealey Plaza was limited to the sixth-floor window and the grassy knoll. If shots had been fired from one or two of the lower floors of the Dal-Tex Building or the County Records Building, more dictabelt impulse patterns may have been matched with test-firing impulse patterns.

If anyone is interested in an extensive introduction to the acoustical evidence, here's the link to my article "The HSCA's Acoustical Evidence: Proof of a Second Gunman":

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KvdvH8gTqFgMn-2vTI5ppg_egWxRKg9U/view.

19
Markham's time estimate was based on a laundromat clock. That's not a timepiece that I'd ever rely on, even for the date.

Bowley is quoted in Into the Nightmare as saying that his watch could have been 5 minutes off, which would be fairly common for that era.

I don't really care what clock Markham used. Having been a frequent user of buses when I was young, I know from first hand experience that people using the buses know exactly when they are supposed to be at the bus stop.

As for Bowley, I would love to see that quote. But beyond that, the school where he picked up his daughter most likely sounded the bell at 1:00 PM. As I have driven the distance and the route from the school to 10th street several times, some years ago, I know for a fact that the journey did not take more that 13 minutes. So, I don't need Bowley's watch to be correct or not. The evidence shows he arrived at 10th street at 1:13 or 1:14 PM.

Btw, if it was common for clocks to be off by 5 minutes and baring in mind what J.C. Bowles said about the DPD dispatcher clocks, how can you be sure that the DPD time stamps were correct?
20
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Q9
« Last post by Dan O'meara on Today at 12:45:34 AM »
Were the FBI deliberately falsifying evidence?
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10