Maybe call it the Decent Way.
Left and Right is over. Both have become the same aggressive, divisive extreme. The 'enemy' is anyone who is not partaking in the extremism.
Decent people from both 'sides' need to recognise they are actually on the same 'side'. They need to put aside the things they traditionally thought separated them and recognise they are all now the 'enemy'.

Republicrats anyone?
Democlicans seems a little clunky.

Dear danny BOY 0'meara,

The KGB-Russian Mafia IS our enemy.

That's something only Democrats seem to understand.

-- Tom

The WC Report tells us that the Sniper's Perch was mainly constructed using "Rolling Reader" boxes taken from a few aisles away from the SN. It tells us that there was a long paper bag found in the southeast corner which may have been used to carry the disassembled to that corner and that there was a box just by the Sniper's Perch which a shooter could sit on while assembling the rifle. It also tells us that it took a firearms expert around 6 minutes to assemble the rifle.
The impression we are left with is that the shooter took time to construct a Sniper's Perch using boxes from different areas on the 6th floor and assembled his rifle while hid in the Sniper's Nest.

Question - when, exactly, did all this preparation take place?

The Middle Way +

Maybe call it the Decent Way.
Left and Right is over. Both have become the same aggressive, divisive extreme. The 'enemy' is anyone who is not partaking in the extremism.
Decent people from both 'sides' need to recognise they are actually on the same 'side'. They need to put aside the things they traditionally thought separated them and recognise they are all now the 'enemy'.

Republicrats anyone?
Democlicans seems a little clunky.

I suspect LHO shot Tippit.

That does not exclude others having shot at JFK, earlier in the day.

I would have started with Dorothy Garner, questioning her to see if she could estimate her time leaving the 4th floor office, following Adams and Stiles,  in terms of seconds. If Garner was fairly certain it could not have been more than 40 seconds post shots then I would proceed to dismantle the running down stairs part of the WC theory.  If Garner further elaborated on her statement of having heard Adams and Styles going down the stairs with a more precise description such as “I heard their voices as they were going down” then I proceed to further demolish any remaining notion of Oswald having used the stairs to get down to the 2nd floor lunchroom in 75 seconds.

To  completely make it impossible that Oswald could have used either freight elevator to bypass Mrs Garner , I would to establish that if either elevator came down that Garner, Adams, and  Styles would have surely heard the elevator in operation. I would have to question  Jack Dougherty to establish a more coherent statement of his location at the time and get a statement from him that he  neither saw nor heard anyone use either elevator to go down to any lower floor except for himself. This would be difficult but perhaps I could get  a sworn statement from Eddie Piper confirming he saw Jack Dougherty arrive to 1st floor using the West elevator just after Baker and Truly had ascended to the 2nd floor Lunchroom by 90 sec post shots.

After providing this information to a judge, I would ask that the accusation of  Oswald being the 6th floor TSBD shooter be dropped from the prosecutions overall case.

The next phase would be to defend Oswald against the charge of having shot Tippit and to establish Oswald was not in any way a conspirator aiding the TSBD shooter. This would be a difficult task to explain the MC rifle with serial no. Linked to the name Alek Hidell that was sent to Oswalds P.O. Box. I would need consultant CT experts to help me to convince a jury that Oswald was not that stupid. It would probably involve the wallet and the ID , the Blue/ Gray Jacket , the inappropriate prejudicial lineup , and the 1:15 DOA document time of Tippits arrival to the emergency room. It would be an uphill battle, but if enough CT experts could testify, the jury might be confused enough to be uncertain if any of  the evidence was properly handled thus reasonable doubt enough to acquit.

If that fails. On appeal I might try the insanity defense if some reputable Psychologists/ Psychiatrists could establish Oswald was a schizophrenic and suffering from postpartum psychosis because his other personality was a female. To help the odds of finding a kooky jury willing to consider such a preposterous argument, I would seek to have the trial in a woke leftist state and select a jury of similar mental defect as displayed by 11 members of a recent jury who acquitted a woman of having slowly methodically strangling her 3 children because she was suffering from postpartum
psychosis.