Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10
11
Both CT'ers and LNT'ers are vulnerable to bias confirmation.

I am wary of anyone who says they saw files...but there is no way for the rest of us to confirm that.
12


   This is Not Euins. (1) Look at this person's height vs those around him. This person is just about the same height as those standing around him. Euins was Extremely SHORT. (2) If the person STANDING on Houston St as the JFK motorcade passes by is supposed to be Euins, how is this same person also then seated on the pedestal facing Elm St as the JFK Motorcade passes by? (3) The alleged "strap" across this person's shoulder is running at a 45 Degree Angle across his back. The "line" across the kid's back that is seated on the pedestal is running STRAIGHT DOWN his back and into his crotch.  The person above is Not Euins. It is Not Euins on many levels.
13
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: The First Shot
« Last post by John Corbett on Today at 02:24:27 PM »
Your LN 3 shot, 3 hits, theory at least makes more sense than one where the TSBD shooter (whomever  he was ) would in a sudden panic , stand up and attempt an early unaimed shot FAR off enough to miss the entire right SIDE of the limo( as per the photo of the LOS perspective from the 6th floor SN window that you previously posted).

At Z190, I do see that JFKs back and neck angle may be more vertical relative to the horizontal line of the limo, as he might have moved his upper back forward thus not leaning so much back in the seat as he was at Z224. But I’d like to see an experiment with dummies to test out the shot and see if it aligns better than the Z224 shot (2003) which by the FAILED, as the bullet exited well below the throat wound level.

That Z190 approx frame coincides (imo) with Harold Norman’s description seeing the president with his right hand up trying to brush his hair when Norman heard the 1st shot. Then the president slumps as Norman describes. jFK slump leftward is maybe enough to theoretically have allowed a Z270 shot that only hit JC.

I have criticized your theory because of the lack of reactions by SS agents and only the Willis girl slowing down. But since I’ve  given some logical reasons why Clint Hill may have missed hearing a 1st shot then I suppose it’s possible that Willis could be more sensitive to a 170 db rifle shot due to not having been desensitized to sudden loud noise of continuous motorcycle backfires as weed the SS agents.

Why would you assume Oswald fired the first shot in a sudden panic? He had ample time to study the layout. Why couldn't he have decided ahead of time, that he could probably get off a shot after the limo turned onto Elm and maybe 2 or 3 more after the limo cleared the tree. That first shot was the most difficult one but he had a better chance of scoring a hit than if he didn't take that shot.

He could have had the same mindset of hockey or soccer players. They know that the more shots on goal you take, the greater your chances of getting one past the goalie. Even if he missed that first shot, he would still have the chance to take the later shots. I wouldn't second guess his choices given that he succeeded in what he was trying to do.
14
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: The First Shot
« Last post by John Corbett on Today at 02:15:14 PM »
After reading from Jacket Kennedy’s WC testimony, she states she was looking LEFT and then after hearing noises  , she turned RIGHT and that’s when she saw JFK with a “quizzical look”  and his LEFT hand was up

Which means, like Clint Hill, she didn't hear the first shot.

Damn, those motorcycles must have been loud.
15
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: The First Shot
« Last post by Andrew Mason on Today at 02:11:47 PM »
It would be quite odd if the limo didn't slow down when making a 110-degree turn, even from the speed they were traveling at through the downtown area.
There are other films showing the turn: the Towner, Hughes and Dorman films. They show a fairly steady speed.  There is also the Secret Service reenactment.
16
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Why did Oswald kill JFK?
« Last post by Tom Graves on Today at 01:16:02 PM »
yeah, that baader-meinhoffen gang, along with black flag and huskier du, they be my kinda music, OG. rock on+

Funny, I thought you were more into The Plastic People of the Universe.
17


That's very convincing, Duncan.

Thanks for posting it!
19
https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/a-response-to-my-post-on-professor-pearcy

A Response to my Post on Professor Pearcy

My post on Professor Pearcy about his speech last week in Indiana was tweeted out by Mark Zaid and Gerald Posner. Their tweets got an interesting reaction from a chief writer at JFK Facts, which is Jefferson Morley's Substack.

It would be ironic if he was mad at probable KGB mole Bruce Solie and didn't realize it.
20
https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/a-response-to-my-post-on-professor-pearcy

A Response to my Post on Professor Pearcy

My post on Professor Pearcy about his speech last week in Indiana was tweeted out by Mark Zaid and Gerald Posner. Their tweets got an interesting reaction from a chief writer at JFK Facts, which is Jefferson Morley's Substack.
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10