What fighting is going on in this "war"?  Do you think Iran should be allowed to create a nuclear weapon that they have indicated that they will use on the US or Israel?  And that short term gas price increases are too much of a burden to keep them from doing so?

Do you think Iran should be allowed to create a nuclear weapon...

Was already stopped 10+ years ago. Trump foolishly tore it up. Here we are.
Iran is sure going to want one now - it could be 5-10 years. You cannot kill ambition.
Trump has taught them the strait has very powerful leverage.

There was no 2 week threat of a nuclear weapon.
Even if they had one, they wouldn't preempt use in their own backyard. That's just stupid.
There is plenty of chemical and bio warfare they could/would use first. They don't.

Question really is; Are they going to be allowed conventional defenses?
Rubio is talking like they can't even have that. What a disaster the US has unnecessarily created.

Trump has dragged us into a war with Iran without Congressional approval.
It is paused right now but STILL going on

What fighting is going on in this "war"?  Do you think Iran should be allowed to create a nuclear weapon that they have indicated that they will use on the US or Israel?  And that short term gas price increases are too much of a burden to keep them from doing so?

Did Congress declare war?  I must have missed that.  What fighting is going on?  I must be missing something.  This is yet another leftist effort to put their own political interest over those of the country.  Iran cannot be allowed to get a nuclear weapon that they have already indicated that they will use against the US or Israel.  The consequences of that outweigh short term gas prices.  To advocate against that outcome is another example why our political process is broken.

Trump has dragged us into a war with Iran without Congressional approval.
It is paused right now but STILL going on

"Trump's War on Iran"   
the only American President or world leader stupid enough to fall for Bibi Netanyahu 

Did Congress declare war?  I must have missed that.  What fighting is going on?  I must be missing something.  This is yet another leftist effort to put their own political interest over those of the country.  Iran cannot be allowed to get a nuclear weapon that they have already indicated that they will use against the US or Israel.  The consequences of that outweigh short term gas prices.  To advocate against that outcome is another example why our political process is broken.

https://i.postimg.cc/SKygH7hR/CE-858.jpg
https://i.postimg.cc/MHj519yb/Lattimer-two.jpg

Humm, I wonder why you didn't show any photos of the two limo fragments, CE 567 and CE 569. Perhaps because you knew people would see that none of the fragments you pictured were deformed in the way the two limo fragments were deformed? Not one of the fragments you've pictured has a substantial part of its body peeled back by virtually 180 degrees.

Here is a link to some high-quality color photos of CE 567 and CE 569:

https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2019/12/kennedy-assassination-bullets-preserved-digital-form

You'll notice that both fragments have a part of the body peeled back by virtually 180 degrees.

I see that David Von Pein has posted a photo of a Carcano rifle with a scope mounted to the left of the barrel that shows an unobstructed, clear view of the iron sights.

I have changed my mind on this issue. After viewing DVP's photo, I examined more photos of the alleged murder weapon that provided a top or top-side view. These photos show that the Ordnance Optics 4x18 scope was mounted to the left of center of the rifle's barrel, which would have enabled the gunman to use the iron sights if he had wanted to do so. My previous position was based on two sources on rifles that said you cannot use the iron sights of a Carcano rifle if a scope is mounted on it, but in rechecking those sources I realized they were assuming the scope was center-mounted. 

So, this explains why the WC's rifle test included one series of shots fired with the iron sights and why the HSCA's rifle test used the iron sights for all shot series.

Of course, this is really a moot point because using the iron sights would have made the shooting feat even more difficult, as Marine Corps weapons expert MSG James Zahm explained to the WC.