Dear Stormtrooper Storing,

I love it when two tinfoil-hat CTs like you and Doyle argue with each other!

-- Tom

   What is obvious is the much higher "Burden Of Proof" required on this Forum. 

Here's the unsolvable problem that Altgens 6 poses for the lone-gunman theory: It shows damage to the windshield of JFK's limousine. Nobody disputes this fact.

Someone should compile a list of the ridiculous claims that you have made over the years. You are a sad strange little man. No damage to the windshield can be seen in Atgens 6. There isn't a single Lone Nutter who believes that the windshield was damaged before the head shot. And only very few conspiracy theorists maintain that damage is visible in Altgens 6. They are a fringe element.

Just to take one example from your litany of lame rationalizations, you say "Jackie moved [turned, to be more precise] her head [to her left starting at Z-145] to acknowledge the crowd."

Rhetorical question: Is that why she had a concerned look on her face as she was looking directly at Robert Croft in his well-known Z-161 photograph?

Seems like a strange way to "acknowledge the crowd."

(Was Secret Service Agent Roy Kellerman turned so far to his right in the Croft photo to "acknowledge the crowd," or to "keep an eye on them xxxxxxx"?)


By the way, you never gave a rational answer to my question:

Why did Secret Service Agent George Hickey lean so far over the side of the car, and when did he begin that motion?


Answers:

Hickey began his conscious response to Oswald's first missing-everything "Z-124" shot by Z-146.

https://assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z146.jpg


He maxed out in Z-157

https://assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z157.jpg

Very compelling evidence of an early shot, however I still maintain there is no definitive proof of how early. We have clues but it comes down to how we weigh those clues as to when that first shot was fired. The clearest reaction is JBC's head turn at Z164. We just don't know how quickly he reacted. A shot at theoretical Z124 would have been heard by JBC at theoretical Z126. That's 38 frames or just over two seconds. It's possible but certainly not definitive. If you are going to postulate a shot before Zapruder resumed filming, I don't know how you can pinpoint it to a theoretical frame.

Hickey did not testify before the WC but he did file a report.
https://www.jfk-assassination.net/russ/m_j_russ/Sa-hicke.htm

The report is a bit vague. He describes the first sound as a disturbance but clearly states the next two were gunshots. I can't find it any reference to this in his report but somebody had stated years ago on McAdams website that Hickey had looked over the side of the car because he thought a tire might have blown out. I don't know where they got that from so I don't know how reliable that claim is. What is interesting to me is that he described the last two shots as sounding different from the first. The question is why did it sound different. You have suggested it was because the first shot was fired with the muzzle inside the building. I have suggested the roar of the accelerating motorcycles could have muffled the sound of the first shot. There is no definitive proof for either explanation.

You can NOT: (1) Put Shelley and Lovelady alongside that car only :20 seconds after the kill shot, and (2) Show Calvery & Reed on the Wiegman Film, "bolting on Adrenaline", as they run down the Elm St sidewalk. You are unable to do this which completely destroys your theory.

Dear Stormtrooper Storing,

I love it when two tinfoil-hat CTs like you and Doyle argue with each other!

-- Tom

Who are you going to believe?...

Lovelady & CIA Shelley or your own lying eyes?...

You're both brainwashed-by-KGB-disinfo kooks in my book.