JFK Assassination Forum

TG-

The case against Bruce Solie is entirely based circumstantial evidence, and even there we hardly have a complete record.

There are no wiretaps, no confessions, no confirmed meetings between Solie and KGB'ers, etc. No records of financial inducement, or that Solie was blackmailed for being a homosexual, etc.

Solie was never put on trial, and is too dead now to mount a defense, or provide explanations or an alternative narrative.

Nor has anyone in the KGB ever said, "Yeah, Solie was one of ours."

You have CT against Solie, as does Newman.

I lean towards Solie being a KGB asset, but I recognize what I have is a suspicion, a CT, not a fact.

If the DPD thought the car had any relevance, why did they release it?

   BUMP.  Either provide the Evidence to support YOUR CLAIM ABOVE, or Retract It.  The above is not merely an opinion. You are claiming this car was "Released".

TG

You are correct, both CT'ers and LNT'ers bridle at the thought that Sawyer called in the "white man 5' 10" 165 lbs" JFKA suspect description.

CT'ers, as it has became canon that the CIA somehow planted that description.

LNT'ers, as it has become canon that only LHO was involved in the JFKA.

I think a witness told Inspector Sawyer that is what he (the witness saw), and Sawyer called it in. Simple.

---30---

In addition to your Bruce Solie CT's, are you now formulating a CT that Sawyer was part of DPD conspiracy to fabricate a witness, who gave them the "5'10" white male, 165, carrying a rifle" description? 

CT'ers of the world, unite!


 

The phrase "Occam's razor" is a bit trite, but in this case...

Inspector Sawyer, evidently a man promoted through the ranks of the DPD, a department that used civil service exams, age 47 and thus not likely senile etc., testified under oath to Belin this:



Sawyer testified the witness said a white male was seen "carrying" a rifle, post JFKA. No clothing description. Sawyer called in the description. Seems clear enough.

The witness may have been unreliable, and the witness evidently then decided to not get further involved.

The word "carrying" does not describe what witnesses saw in the TSBD6 sniper window, which was a figure pointing a rifle towards the motorcade.

If I had seen figure in the TSBD6 window shooting in the direction of the motorcade, I would not say "the figure was 'carrying' a rifle."

I am not sure why, but many witnesses in Dallas back then seemed fearful of getting involved in the JFKA in any fashion. Other people are fearful of publicity or police, and dismissive of official forms and falderal. The witness may have thought, "I have discharged my civic duty, and the rest is up to them."

The most reasonable deduction is a contemporary 11.22 witness told the DPD they saw a white man, approx. 5' 10" 165 lbs, "carrying" a rifle in the aftermath of the JFKA, near or around the TSBD. 

That is likely what happened.

Was the 11.22 witness accurate in his observations? Who knows?

Herr Corbett,

Do you think concentration camp denizens during WW II suffered from Hitler Derangement Syndrome?

(You do believe in the Holocaust, don't you? Or do you think it was overblown, and maybe even a deception op by the Libtard Dems?)

-- Tom

I'm not anti-Semitic like so many on the political left.