Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10
11
"Talking points" don't make it untrue.   An endless open check from US taxpayers to Zelensky is not the solution.  There is no reason that Ukraine could not hold an election.  People can vote by mail or text if necessary.  I see many people going about their normal daily business in many areas.  I bet Putin might even agree to a short ceasefire to let them vote.  If Zelensky felt he could win an election, it would happen.   I'm 100% supportive of Ukraine but the US should be expected to solve their issue.  They will also be in Russia's sphere of influence.  Nothing can change that.  Putin and his KGB generation will soon be gone.  Any hope lies with a different generation of leaders.

Your comments sound remarkably similar to those who thought the United States should not become involved in WWII. You are "100% supportive of Ukraine" as long as your support doesn't affect you and the price of eggs. There is no way that Zelensky would lose an election. Literally all of Europe views the Ukrainian situation far more seriously and consequentially than you apparently do. Yes, Europe has allowed itself to become militarily weak and overly dependent on the U.S., but the U.S. has cheerfully contributed to that situation for decades; writing off Ukraine at this point is not the solution to that problem. I happen to have had breakfast with a State Department official in Minsk in 2007 who cited Ukraine as the shining example of what the former Soviet republics could become. Now, in the view of Trump cultists it's "screw 'em, they're just part of Putin's sphere of influence (whatever the hell that means) anyway." In my opinion, Trump cultists are absolutely no different from the TDS cult; it's just two crazy cults screeching past each other.
12
If the DPD thought the car had any relevance, why did they release it?

     In order for your claimed DPD "release" of this car, the car had to of been "claimed". And of course, "paperwork" would then be involved. I would be interested in seeing your evidence that any of this happened.
     Continuing to research the JFK Assassination is mandatory. That is of course unless you enjoy continually having to take "back water".   
13
      Your ignorance is obviously Not restricted to the JFK Assassination. Just because you see what you Think is Haygood's signature, does Not mean he actually did sign the article. The autograph market in all fields of interest is loaded with "reproductions". Next time, just ask me if the image has Haygood in it. This will save your present standing around here from falling even further.
      "Dead Ringer"? Where did his sunglasses go? Where did his motorcycle glove go?   

I feel sure you will be pleased to know that I have forwarded your concerns about the provenance of this photo and signature to the seemingly highly reputable seller of much Haygood merchandise. Perhaps his attorney will be in touch with you.
14
No offense, but these are just Trump-speak talking points. A "slightly" more nuanced perspective from the Journal of Democracy, written by two experts on Ukrainian politics:

A year ago, some in government thought that it might be possible to hold the presidential election despite the war, not least because the president would have won easily: According to data collected by MOBILISE (led by Olga Onuch) in partnership with the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology (KIIS), Zelensky’s approval was sky-high at 85 percent in July 2023, even with few gains on the battlefield. That number has since dipped — to 77 percent in late 2023. More recent data from February suggest that trust in Zelensky also declined from 77 to 64 percent in February 2024, likely because of Zelensky’s unpopular decision to reshuffle the army leadership. Nonetheless, the president remains the most popular and trusted politician in Ukraine by a wide margin. Only military figures such as former army commander-in-chief Valerii Zaluzhnyi and army-intelligence chief Kyrylo Budanov are more popular than Zelensky.

Ultimately the government chose not to hold elections — a decision that was in line with both the recommendations of local elections-focused NGOs and Ukrainian public opinion: According to a December 2023 survey, 84 percent of Ukrainians opposed holding a presidential election. When asked in February 2024 what should happen in lieu of elections, 69 percent preferred that Zelensky stay in office until the end of martial law. Even among those who dislike the president, it is hard to find anyone in Ukraine who supports holding a vote now. Opposition leaders such as former prime minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk have publicly recognized that, despite their disagreements with the president on most things, now is not the time to go to the polls and Zelensky’s legitimacy is not in question.

The most fundamental reason for not holding elections is that approximately a third of the country’s population would face enormous challenges participating — including around 6.5 million Ukrainians living abroad (over a million of whom reside in Russia) and five million living in Russian-occupied Ukrainian territories, as well as nearly four million internally displaced people and a million active military personnel. Finding and registering these displaced Ukrainians would be an enormous undertaking, one that would effectively be impossible in Russia or areas under Russian control, which include Crimea and five Ukrainian provinces. Locating Ukrainian military personnel would not be hard, but arranging a free and fair vote on the frontlines would be. How does one ensure a secret ballot in the trenches? In addition, active warfare in significant parts of Ukrainian-controlled territory creates obvious difficulties: Missile and other attacks occur almost daily in various parts of Ukraine, including large cities such as Kharkiv.

All this means that voter turnout would not only be low, but would systematically underrepresent those Ukrainians most directly affected by the war. Chosen by a rump of the population, winners of such elections might be considered illegitimate by at least some of the population. And Russia would likely make its own accusations of illegitimacy in an effort to polarize Ukrainian voters and cast international doubt on Ukraine’s democracy.

Very few democracies have held elections with an active military conflict on their territory. Among European democracies directly affected by World War II, only Denmark (under German occupation) held elections during the war. Great Britain did not hold elections between 1935 and the war’s end in July 1945. The United States did hold elections in 1864 during the American Civil War, but without the participation of nine Confederate states. This does not seem to be a good model to follow: The systematic exclusion of Southern states almost certainly exacerbated polarization in the country.

...

Thus, while it is certainly possible to hold some kind of elections in Ukraine, it would be nearly impossible to hold ones that are free, fair, and inclusive. Some Ukrainians fear that election campaigning would sow divisions in society at a moment when the country needs to remain united. Moreover, organizing elections now would divert scarce resources and attention away from defending Ukraine against the existential threat from Russia.


"Talking points" don't make it untrue.   An endless open check from US taxpayers to Zelensky is not the solution.  There is no reason that Ukraine could not hold an election.  People can vote by mail or text if necessary.  I see many people going about their normal daily business in many areas.  I bet Putin might even agree to a short ceasefire to let them vote.  If Zelensky felt he could win an election, it would happen.   I'm 100% supportive of Ukraine but the US should be expected to solve their issue.  They will also be in Russia's sphere of influence.  Nothing can change that.  Putin and his KGB generation will soon be gone.  Any hope lies with a different generation of leaders.
15
It's almost tragic how "weak and uninformed" almost everyone who disagrees with you seems to be, even if they've spent 40 or more years deeply involved in JFKA lore. One would think there would be SOMEONE out there who could match wits with your devilishly clever insights and CurIoUs sPelliNG (or, rather, CAPitAlizaTion).

All I know is, Clyde Haygood signed about 50 copies of that photo over a period of years, ostensibly on the basis that it depicts him. Ditto for about 50 photos of him on the overpass. If you have conclusive evidence it is not Clyde, you will have to take this up with the Administrators of the Estate of Clyde A. Haygood, Deceased. Perhaps you can file a class action on behalf of all those who have been defrauded.

My point is simply that there are multiple photos that are unquestionably Clyde Haygood, and that the Real Haygood is, remarkably enough, a dead ringer for your One Glove Bogus Imposter Haygood With a Mystery Device in His Hand Guy.

      Your ignorance is obviously Not restricted to the JFK Assassination. Just because you see what you Think is Haygood's signature, does Not mean he actually did sign the article. The autograph market in all fields of interest is loaded with "reproductions". Next time, just ask me if the image has Haygood in it. This will save your present standing around here from falling even further.
      "Dead Ringer"? Where did his sunglasses go? Where did his motorcycle glove go?     
16
Free your mind, dude! There WAS a car waiting. But when Oswald saw Vinny and Guido the Knife, instead of Shirley and Babs as he'd been promised, he smelled a rat. He realized no one would whack him on public transportation, so he hopped a bus and hailed a taxi. After making sure Big Louie wasn't parked in front of Beckley, he grabbed his revolver and started down the sidewalk. Yes, it falls apart just a bit at that "started down the sidewalk" part, but other than that it's rock-solid.

It's fun seeing what one can come up with when one frees himself from what the evidence allows.
17
Cool! No one will believe this, but I had an epiphany of sorts when I was only about 5 years old. I was fascinated by death, or perhaps "What is life?" I would hold little funerals for dead birds and lizards and whatnot and wonder "So what's the difference between this and what it was an hour ago?" Standing in my parents' gravel driveway, I had an epiphany out of nowhere: "Electricity! Life is fundamentally electrical, and what survives is electrical." 71 years later, and far more sophisticated in my thinking, I still think somewhat along those lines.

When I was maybe 55, I had a dream in which the name "Lynne McTaggert" kept appearing. I had no clue who LM was - she could have been an obscure WNBA basketball player for all I knew. So I Googled her name and discovered she is the author of The Field: The Quest for the Secret Force of the Universe, which is very much along the lines of my epiphany as a toddler!
Me myself i looked more closely into the jfk saga say 4 years ago, koz i needed a holiday from silly Einsteinian faux science.
I am glad that i did senior education. Koz nowadays it givs me much satisfaction being able to cross swords with ignorant Einsteinists.
I did my fair share of trout fishing, tennis, billiards, hang gliding, gliding, golf, etc.
Instead of applying for a newly created senior position made just for me, i resigned, & i mooved to a junior position in a different field.
Jobs should not dictate your life. Other things are more important in the long run. Life iz short.
Today i hav kangaroos & wallabies & echidnas & blue tongued lizards & a dozen kinds of birds around my house.
A few years ago there were 2 sightings of a Tasmanian Tiger in the bush behind my place.
8 years ago i had 3 horses 3 dogs & my wife, now all gone.
Nowadays every day iz a gift.





18
If Oswald was a patsy, there would have been a car waiting for him near the TSBD that would have driven him to his death. I doubt they would have found his body.

Free your mind, dude! There WAS a car waiting. But when Oswald saw Vinny and Guido the Knife, instead of Shirley and Babs as he'd been promised, he smelled a rat. He realized no one would whack him on public transportation, so he hopped a bus and hailed a taxi. After making sure Big Louie wasn't parked in front of Beckley, he grabbed his revolver and started down the sidewalk. Yes, it falls apart just a bit at that "started down the sidewalk" part, but other than that it's rock-solid.
19
I’ve looked at some more of the Z-film frame by frame using the Costella edit which includes the area between the sprockets, and I’ve discovered that at Z212 2 SS agents beside and across from Clint Hill are still visible and they are looking forward.
You cannot see the agents on the right running board (i.e. across from Clint Hill) in z212.  Those agents are Jack Ready (right front) and Paul Landis (right rear).  The last frame in which they are visible is z207.  Ready said that he turned to his right upon hearing the first shot.  In order to do that he had to remove his right hand from the front hand-hold.  He did that between z198 and z200 and turned to his right:


Quote
Up to Z230, the SS agent behind Clint Hill is visible and at Z230 this agent is still looking forward.
That is SA McIntyre and he is looking much more to the left at z230 than he was in z193. In fact he is looking left before z206. 

Quote
Should there not have been some Clint Hill reaction from Z190-Z230 even if he was tasked with keeping his eyes focused on JFK?
He was watching events happening in the car.  He may have been thinking about whether he could make it to the President's car if he jumped off. 

Quote
So it seems to be a discrepancy in reaction time  by the SS agents up to at least Z230 versus the more immediate reaction of the Willis girl stopping running by Z200.
Rosemary Willis said she turned to look back at the TSBD and saw pigeons flying from the roof.  She turns suddenly from z202-206:

20
It's almost tragic how "weak and uninformed" almost everyone who disagrees with you seems to be, even if they've spent 40 or more years deeply involved in JFKA lore. One would think there would be SOMEONE out there who could match wits with your devilishly clever insights and CurIoUs sPelliNG (or, rather, CAPitAlizaTion).

All I know is, Clyde Haygood signed about 50 copies of that photo over a period of years, ostensibly on the basis that it depicts him. Ditto for about 50 photos of him on the overpass. If you have conclusive evidence it is not Clyde, you will have to take this up with the Administrators of the Estate of Clyde A. Haygood, Deceased. Perhaps you can file a class action on behalf of all those who have been defrauded.

My point is simply that there are multiple photos that are unquestionably Clyde Haygood, and that the Real Haygood is, remarkably enough, a dead ringer for your One Glove Bogus Imposter Haygood With a Mystery Device in His Hand Guy.
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10