Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10
11
What made me mad was we were told to trust the experts. There were no experts. Everyone was guessing and mostly guessing badly. In the early days of the pandemic, Trump wanted to shut down travel from China and his critics accused him of being xenophobic and overreacting. Months later, those same critics were saying he didn't do enough soon enough. Then we had Fauci pretending he was some kind of guru when most of what he told us turned out to be dead wrong.

Go to hell, Fauci. You won't be missed.

I agree.  They not only bungled the response but then they allowed the Dems to hijack the pandemic for their political purposes under the guise of quack science.  The Dems did everything possible to maximize the pain.  Their TDS hatred made them want the country to suffer because it allowed them to blame Trump.  Fauci should have been an expert.  His entire job was to prepare for a pandemic.  When it finally came, he was making it up as he went along.  As though no possible lessons could have been learned from the many past pandemics.   He was not only incompetent but his desire for attention and wealth made it all the worse.   He catered to the media and celebrity forces that were all on the TDS train to make COVID Trump's fault.  Fauci took that ride instead of standing up to them.
12
In their very first paragraph in their report, the third sentence, the HSCA concluded that Lee Harvey Oswald killed JFK. And that he - and he alone - fired all of the shots that killed JFK and wounded JC. There were no other shots from any other gunman that hit JFK or JC.



Link: https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/report/html/HSCA_Report_0005a.htm
13
    You're dodging. And for a very good reason. You know where Wiegman was standing when he filmed the Newman Family. There is image evidence to validate this physical position. Wiegman was standing well (W) of where we see this hatted figure on the Bell Film. If you believe this hatted figure on the Bell Film is Wiegman, how do you think he got down there next to the Newman Family? Magic Carpet? If you think that hatted figure is Wiegman, that figure had to move (W) and (S) to arrive alongside the Newman Family.

No Royell, I'm not dodging anything.
I'm trying my hardest to work with you but you keep inventing things that aren't happening, which makes it impossible to move forward. The vast majority of my time on this thread has been trying to unravel nonsense you are making up out of thin air. Near the beginning of this thread you were insisting the Bell film showed Weigman running towards Zapruder. This turned out to be made up nonsense. Now you are again insisting there is a man running across the knoll in the Bell footage who someone has claimed is Weigman. This is complete nonsense. I'm challenging you to produce proof of the claims you have made about this person running in the Bell film. I'm starting to believe you are either lying, for some inexplicable reason, or something worse.
I'm not wasting another second on this until you clarify why you have been making these claims about Weigman running in the Bell footage when no such thing happens.
14
Comprehensive statistical analyses and state-level audits have confirmed that Joe Biden's 2020 vote totals were not a statistical outlier and showed no evidence of systemic fraud from ballot harvesting . https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2419633122

Isn't it the least bit disturbing that after 6 years Trump still thinks he won the 2020 election?
It's either total delusion or a con.

LOL.  That one is a keeper.  Audits run by who?  The Dems.  This is real, real simple.  It just takes common sense when you look at the numbers.  Trump won in 2016 having received approximately 62 million votes.  He lost in 2020 having received 72 million votes (10 million more than when he won).  That is because Biden got 82 million votes.  Approximately 20 million more votes than anyone is US history including Obama.  Nothing to see there?  Do you think an aging, lifelong politician like Biden with the charisma of a door knob is the most popular politician in US history? Tens of millions more than Reagan, JFK, Clinton, Kamala, or Obama.   So what explains this outlier?  Only one thing was going on at that time to explain it.  The voting laws in nearly every state were changed using COVID as the pretext.  That allowed unverified voting by mail. 
15
LOL! This is just hilarious. This confirms my theory that you are stuck in a time warp and are living in the mid-1960s.

If any newcomers would like some online sources on the mountain of problems with the case against Oswald, I offer the following:

Impossible: The Case Against Lee Harvey Oswald
This is the free online version of all three volumes of Barry Krusch's famous work on the problems with the evidence against Oswald in the JFK shooting. The three volumes are combined into one downloadable PDF.

"Forensic Science and President Kennedy's Head Wounds"
This article presents abundant wound-ballistics evidence that the ammo that hit JFK's head was not the kind of ammo that Oswald allegedly used.

"Lee Harvey Oswald’s Two Jackets and Why the Tippit Killer’s Jacket Was Not One of Them"
A detailed study by highly respected researcher Greg Doudna. Although this study focuses on the descriptions of the killer’s jacket, it also discusses several other items of evidence that indicate that Oswald did not shoot Officer J. D. Tippit.

"Did Oswald Shoot Tippit? A Review of Dale Myers’ Book With Malice"
A detailed rebuttal to the case against Oswald in the Tippit shooting.

"Faulty Evidence: Problems with the Case Against Lee Harvey Oswald"
This 42-page article includes a long section on the backyard rifle photos. The article also discusses Oswald's marksmanship and the alleged lone-gunman's shooting performance, the palmprint that was allegedly found on the barrel of the supposed murder weapon, Oswald's whereabouts at the time of the shooting, and the dubious testimony of Howard Brennan (the one and only man who claimed he saw Oswald shooting from the sixth-floor window).

This reminds me of that ridiculous essay you used to post to newcomers on the old Prodigy service. You have been trying to mislead the newbies for 35 years now. The ones who took you seriously never had a chance.
16
I guess you're unaware that the HSCA's photographic experts determined that JFK begins to react at Z200 and that Jackie starts to react to JFK's reaction just before Z207. Don Olson and Ralph Turner noted the same Z200-207 JFK reactions in their article "Photographic Evidence and the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy" published in the October 1971 edition of the Journal of Forensic Sciences (pp. pp. 399–419). You are once again years behind the information curve.

Actually I've been aware for a long time that the HSCA believed a lot of crapola, not just the acoustic evidence, their photo expert being one such example.
Quote

Umm, no, the acoustical evidence indicated no such thing. You're referring to Blakey's forced, arbitrary matching of the gunshot impulses to certain Zapruder frames.

If the acoustic pattern can't be matched to the Z-film, that is further repudiation of it.
Quote

Furthermore, as I have explained several times, the HSCA's Dealey Plaza test firing did not fire any shots from a lower or upper window of the Dal-Tex Building, which was right next to the TSBD, even though researchers had long identified the Dal-Tex Building as a source of gunfire. The test firing also did not fire any shots from the south knoll area, even though researchers had identified that location as another source of gunfire. Even in its current edited state, the Zapruder film shows reactions to six shots ("Reactions to Six Shots in the Zapruder Film").

Why would they test for shots from the Dal-Tex. There is zero evidence of a shooter in that location. At least the GK had earwitnesses who thought they heard shots from that location.
Quote

The acoustical evidence is solid with regard to the number and location of identified gunshot impulse patterns, but the limitations imposed on the Dealey Plaza test firing make any matching of the impulse patterns with Zapruder frames questionable from the outset.



I guess that's your excuse for why your precious acoustics evidence doesn't jibe with your other goofy ideas.
Quote

Additionally, given the scientific evidence that the Zapruder film has been altered, there is no way to confidently correlate dictabelt impulse patterns with Zapruder frames.

I'm not at all surprised that someone who thinks the acoustic evidence is compelling would reject the Z-film, the single best witness we have of the JFKA. You have the same litmus test most CTs use for weighing evidence. If it supports your goofy beliefs, it must be authentic and if it conflicts with your goofy beliefs, it must be fraudulent.
Quote

For those who might be interested, here are some sources on the evidence that the Zapruder film has been altered: Physicist Dr. John Costella's multi-part study "A Simple Introduction to the JFK Assassination Film Hoax"; Dr. David Mantik's 42-page article "The Zapruder Film Controversy" and his video presentation A Closer Look at the Zapruder Film: The Case for Alteration; and my article "Evidence of Alteration in the Zapruder Film". Dr. Mantik points out that dozens of Hollywood film experts have found indications of alteration in the Zapruder film.

You and Mantik seem to share a trait. You both think you are experts in all fields related to the JFKA.
Quote

And did you forget that the HSCA FPP's findings about the back wound's location and upward trajectory prove that the back-wound bullet could not have come from the sixth-floor window, unless JFK had been leaning markedly forward when the bullet hit? Have you found a photo or frame that shows JFK leaning markedly forward between Z185 and Z224? If so, please share it. If not, just admit the shot could not have come from the sixth-floor window.

By that reasoning, it couldn't have come from the Dal-Tex building either. So where do you place that shooter?
17
Moreover, Albert, Ralph Sink proved that it was Bookhout and not Ruby that shot Ozzie in his warm sweater.  So, there’s that, right ?  He still blogs about it, you should try that, maybe join forces with him and get to the bottom of things.
18
That finding alone invalidates the HSCA analysis since JFK showed no reaction to having been shot until after he reappeared from behind the sign about 2 seconds later when both he and JBC suddenly flipped their arms upward.

I guess you're unaware that the HSCA's photographic experts determined that JFK begins to react at Z200 and that Jackie starts to react to JFK's reaction just before Z207. Don Olson and Ralph Turner noted the same Z200-207 JFK reactions in their article "Photographic Evidence and the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy" published in the October 1971 edition of the Journal of Forensic Sciences (pp. pp. 399–419). You are once again years behind the information curve.

The acoustic "evidence" indicated that shot came from the sniper's nest so we are expected to believe Oswald fired at JFK through the foliage of the tree. Ridiculous.

Umm, no, the acoustical evidence indicated no such thing. You're referring to Blakey's forced, arbitrary matching of the gunshot impulses to certain Zapruder frames.

Furthermore, as I have explained several times, the HSCA's Dealey Plaza test firing did not fire any shots from a lower or upper window of the Dal-Tex Building, which was right next to the TSBD, even though researchers had long identified the Dal-Tex Building as a source of gunfire. The test firing also did not fire any shots from the south knoll area, even though researchers had identified that location as another source of gunfire. Even in its current edited state, the Zapruder film shows reactions to six shots ("Reactions to Six Shots in the Zapruder Film").

The acoustical evidence is solid with regard to the number and location of gunshot impulse patterns identified on the dictabelt in relation to the shots fired during the Dealey Plaza test firing, but the limitations imposed on the test firing and the possibility that one or two of the gunmen used a silencer or fired from a position that prevented the shot from being recorded by the patrolman's microphone mean (1) that the dictabelt cannot be assumed to contain all the gunshots that were fired, (2) that certain impulse patterns on the tape that were not identified as gunfire may have been gunfire that came from shooting locations that were not tested, and (3) make any matching of the dictabelt's impulse patterns with Zapruder frames questionable from the outset.

Additionally, given the scientific evidence that the Zapruder film has been altered, there is no way to confidently correlate the dictabelt's impulse patterns with Zapruder frames.

For those who might be interested, here are some sources on the evidence that the Zapruder film has been altered: Physicist Dr. John Costella's multi-part study "A Simple Introduction to the JFK Assassination Film Hoax"; Dr. David Mantik's 42-page article "The Zapruder Film Controversy" and his video presentation A Closer Look at the Zapruder Film: The Case for Alteration; and my article "Evidence of Alteration in the Zapruder Film". Dr. Mantik points out that dozens of Hollywood film experts have found indications of alteration in the Zapruder film.

And did you forget that the HSCA FPP's findings about the back wound's location and upward trajectory prove that the back-wound bullet could not have come from the sixth-floor window, unless JFK had been leaning markedly forward when the bullet hit? Have you found a photo or frame that shows JFK leaning markedly forward between Z185 and Z224? If so, please share it. If not, just admit the shot could not have come from the sixth-floor window.
19
Yes, it’s quite an echo chamber when they’re all fawning over their ‘how it really went down’ scenarios.  I mean……….. they’re really serious !
20
Hey, did you see a Russian oligarch help pay for junior's wedding?
Maybe that's why dad had better not sit in on this one, huh?

https://newrepublic.com/post/215371/donald-trump-jr-wedding-bankrolled-vladimir-putin-ally
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10