What you have demonstrated with this nonsense is that you are not a person who should be taken seriously and I won't.
Only a coward would make such a statement.
If I'd really posted any nonsense you would jump all over it. The fact is that you daren't genuinely engage in the debate because you've already made a buffoon out of yourself and fear further embarrassment.
So far two Nutters have tried to tackle this issue.
Both accept that Givens returned to the 6th floor because the Warren Commission told them to think that.
This leaves them in a difficult position.
Fact - Givens was questioned by Fritz and the FBI on the day of the assassination and failed to mention this key piece of information.
Fact - the WC failed to question why Givens was suddenly introducing this brand new piece of evidence.
Fact - this fabrication was used in the WC Report to demonstrate that the last person to see Oswald saw him on the 6th floor near the crime scene.
Fact - the WC Report stated that no-one else could be found who saw Oswald after Givens did. This is a falsehood (fact)
Fact - the WC omitted the testimonies of Lovelady, Arce and Williams regarding the elevator race.
Fact - the WC Report completely alters the reality of this incident.
Fact - the WC omitted the testimony of Eddie Piper, the last TSBD employee to see Oswald.
Fact - the reality is that Oswald was on the first floor around 12 noon. The WC report narrative is that Oswald was on the 6th floor, near the southeast corner.
Childish Nutter Logic does not apply - "they wouldn't do that therefore they didn't do it" or "I don't know why they would do that therefore they didn't do it".
Pretending that eyewitness testimony placing the prime suspect at the scene of the crime is trivial is not a sustainable strategy.
PS: I see John Mytton has posted on this thread but not concerning the topic of this thread - what do you think, John? Do you accept the Givens story?