Not that I know of...I have been telling Kamp for 10 years that he is misrepresenting the context of Hosty's notes that he is showing...Kamp dishonestly insists that the notes show that Oswald was out on the front steps during the assassination as Prayer Man and he is presenting this as conclusive proof...If you observe Fritz and Bookhout's notes Fritz's inclusion of "When Officer Came In" calibrates the notes to 90 seconds after the shots when Baker confronted Oswald in the 2nd Floor Lunch Room...Once a dubious researcher like Kamp makes such a complex false claim it is difficult to undo it because it takes so much correction...However it is easy to see that all 3 sets of notes from the 3pm Interrogation all start at 90 seconds after the shots at the Lunch Room Encounter...All 3 go downstairs to eat lunch, and all 3 then go out with Shelley on the front steps...Therefore the part of Hosty's notes quoted by Kamp occurs 4 minutes after the shots and cannot be used as evidence for Oswald being Prayer Man...Kamp is quite aware of this but he dishonestly ignores it and in doing so has tied up the entire research community in a BS theory fully endorsed by the fool Jim DiEugenio...When Hosty writes "Went out to watch Presidential Parade" he is talking about 4 minutes after the shots...Kamp is clearly committing a false reference there and refuses to listen to the correct interpretation...He has a whole internet of supporters who help him with this deliberate deception...

The true interpretation is seen in Fritz's testimony to the Commission where he told Ball that Oswald told them he was eating a cheese sandwich and apple in the 2nd Floor Lunch Room during the assassination...Obviously, Oswald told this to the 3pm Interrogation and this is why the notes were torn up and the lie was formulated that they took no notes Texas style...Oswald told the 3pm Interrogation that he was eating lunch in the 2nd Floor Lunch Room during the assassination and that caused a major problem that was solved by the present notes that conspicuously omit this admission like an obvious glaring donut hole exactly in the right place in the existing notes...Fritz, Bookhout, and Hosty solved this problem by starting their notes 90 seconds after the shots at the Lunch Room Encounter and therefore omitting Oswald being in the in the Lunch Room during the assassination right before it...When you look at the existing notes you can't unsee this...Fritz, Bookhout, and Hosty all clumsily excised this admission from their notes and it stands out like a sore thumb...It is this correct explanation that Kamp refuses to allow and in doing so, and sticking to his bogus Prayer Man theory, both he and DiEugenio, and the sycophants who support them, are holding up a final solving of the conspiracy...

All 3 sets of notes wrote about being with Shelley out front in vague terms because Oswald was covering up the fact Shelley helped him around the cop at the front door who told Oswald to step aside and stay put...Shelley saw Oswald was in trouble and helped him around the police detainment at the front door and out the back...So the 3pm Interrogation notes had two major problems they needed to bury and what you see is how they did it...They simply removed Oswald telling them he was eating lunch in the 2nd Floor Lunch Room during the shots...And they blurred Shelley helping Oswald out the rear exit after a cop told him to step aside at the front door...Kamp helps muddy all this and serves to inhibit the solving of the case because he can't break off his juvenile attachment to this Prayer Man BS...

   Why were the alleged "Hosty Notes" NOT verified? This should have been Step 1 after the Notes were allegedly discovered by Kamp. Once again, the JFK Assassination Research Community has fallen on its' Bahookie.

such is the empty you pass out here every day.

I figured out the JFKA a long time ago. The CTs are still grasping at straws.

The AI definition of the phrase "grasping at straws" perfectly defines the CT efforts over the past six decades:

The phrase "grasping at straws" means to make a desperate attempt to save oneself or succeed in a situation where the chances are very slim, often by resorting to unlikely or flimsy solutions

It can also refer to trying desperately to support an argument with irrelevant points

Essentially, it describes a futile effort to find a solution when all options seem ineffective

This whole discussion is a perfect example of CTs trying to find significance in the most insignificant things. They have no real evidence that anybody except Oswald took part in the crime so they think if they can come up with some unexplained event, that proves conspiracy. It is a completely illogical approach, but this is all the CTs have after 62 years.

Contradictions in the evidence are not insignificant, but I fully understand why you would like them to be.

Perhaps you should stop complaining about "CTs" and (for once) try to answer a question. Your constant lack of answers shows just how weak your superficial case really is.

When people are looking at a famous person in a parade, they don't look at the person sideways, the turn their face directly towards them.

A reasonable observation. It was a once in a lifetime opportunity for most people in Dealey Plaza to see Jack and Jackie up close. Who is going to look at them in their peripheral vision? But Andrew is so desperate to save his silly theory that he'll come up with anything.

Geesh, that's quite a fantasy you've manufactured there, Brian. Has anybody purchased the movie rights yet? After all, make-believe wild fantasies like the one you've spun in your above post are sometimes big box-office hits. Good luck.

An AI movie?  Great suggestion, David!  Would be cheaper than what a one raff sink sunk into his movie about the towpath murder of Mary Pinchot may she rest in peace. Ever seen it? omg…