It is a common practice by the CT community when they come across an anomaly or discrepancy to automatically assume it is evidence of a conspiracy instead asking themselves if there is a non-sinister explanation available. In just about every case there is as this incident reveals but the CTs thrive on assuming the most sinister explanation is the correct one.

it is common practice for nutters to explain these discrepancies away with lame excuses.
  they just pile up. every one. every time.

but your posting style brings out the worst in people, they might start accusing you of ‘puffery’.  ever heard that word, bird?  dang, this is turning into one of your block paragraphs so I better stop.  waiting for da ali g movie for I to see.

Perhaps I should copy your exemplary academic posting style...Meanwhile the posting style of the Prayer Man trolls goes uncriticized, which involves some of the worst organized corruption and dishonesty in internet history...Kamp then gets the endorsement of podcast idiots who are just looking to self-promote themselves with popular theories and researchers - evidence be damned (Ciphered Past, Robbie Robertson, Rob Clark, Len Osanic)...

Prayer Man is holding her purse up in front of her face and is looking down in to it...Her grand daughter Wanda sent me a photo of herself holding the purse as a child...

The internet allows dominating personalities to manipulate moderator favoritism and place friendships and clique over good evidence...They keep Mark Knight around to make sure they get away with it...Once disproven they keep their bad bans and don't apologize...It is much easier to just ban the people who out-argue you instead of admitting your were wrong...

……and I admitted my error thinking it was a dude taking pictures with a camera.  She’s holding something up to her face and it looked like a camera to me, but you and Duncan turned me around.  Imagine that?  takes a lot to change my shrinking brain.
but your posting style brings out the worst in people, they might start accusing you of ‘puffery’.  ever heard that word, bird?  dang, this is turning into one of your block paragraphs so I better stop.  waiting for da ali g movie for I to see.

and as for not posting anything of substance, all i can do for you there is quote the
Moody Blues, to wit:

“all the words you can say have been said
 it’s for you my tears I shed”
            ———————————“What Am I Doing Here?”

    When the woman's dress neckline appeared a couple of years ago John Cotter and some other members posted that it vindicated "The much maligned Brian Doyle"...There was, of course, no honest response to Cotter's remark on the forum...The Alpha Wolves on The Education Forum have hijacked the forum and are enforcing non-mention of myself or my research under any circumstances...Gordon was still in charge when that new evidence from the 6th Floor Museum 1st generation copy of Darnell emerged so the Alpha Wolves knew they would have backing for their dishonesty and not have to account for evidence that proved they were squarely wrong and therefore had persecuted and censored an innocent researcher whose evidence proved to be correct...That's how Jim DiEugenio rolls...Gordon was, at that time, wandering away from the forum and abandoning it...Perhaps out of the realization that I had won...The Education Forum almost lost their site due to them not detecting a rogue administrator and keeping him honest...Iler knows exactly what shoes he's filling and what is expected of him...The "Moderator Team" keeps members from pointing out the sheer conflict of interest Iler's association with Jim DiEugenio represents...Iler's power is purely technical and is due to Invision's proprietary rules that are written in favor of legality instead of academic honesty...Jim D ignores all this and leans entirely on censorship and shunning and his bet pays off...Sandy Larsen also knew what was expected of him and helped save the clique from losing face by declaring that the dress neckline was a CIA forgery designed to conceal Oswald's work shirt collar...Larsen did that with no evidence what so ever on a site where Iler hypocritically announces that such evidence is required of all members...Larsen was then allowed to ignore layers of other evidence that showed the neckline was Sarah Stanton's dress neckline...Though Iler sells himself as a caller for objective proof and the best evidence he ignores that Schnapf and others have worked the forum and are using the bias they enjoy to avoid calling for the 6th Floor Museum copy of Darnell...They are avoiding that copy because the favored clique members have worked their favored status and lobbied the forum to not call for the best available copy of Darnell...The simple reason for this is because they know the 6th Floor Museum copy will expose their wrongness on Prayer Man and it is not something they are going to willingly admit while they are in control of the forum...

How do you explain the upward angle of the back shot? This bullet went on to make the dent by the mirror. Above Ks head.

If you mean the shot that passed through JBC - the second shot - the bullet could have deflected off the back of his radius and fragmented. This impact could have deflected fragments up striking the windshield and frame and at least one of the fragments may have gone over the windshield striking the road near Tague.  Greer said he heard an impact sound on the second shot. Tague believed he was struck on the second shot because he heard one shot after he felt the strike on his cheek.