Recent Posts
11
General Discussion And Debate (Any Topic) / Re: Why Vladimir Putin put Donald Trump in the White House
« Last post by Tom Graves on Yesterday at 07:23:25 PM »Graves seems to have a dual case of Trump Derangement Syndrome and Putin Derangement Syndrome. 304 electoral votes put Trump in the White House. He actually won 307 but three faithless electors chose not to vote for the man they pledged to vote for. Putin had nothing to do with electing those 304 electors. The people of the various states voted for them.
Dear Herr Corbett,
Because they were zombified, like you, by disinformation and "active measures."
By the way, I'm very grateful that I have a case or two of Trump Disinformation Sanitizer (TDS).
You should get some, too, before it's too late.
Just remember: Don't drink it -- it's not bleach.
-- Tom
P.S. "Former" KGB counterintelligence officer, Putin?
Do you worship him as much as The Traitorous Orange You-Know-What does, Herr Corbett?
12
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Andrew Iler Cannot Clean Up Education Forum
« Last post by Michael T. Griffith on Yesterday at 07:22:16 PM »And you're a far-right wingnut.
LOL! Umm, nope. Big swing and a miss. I'm a centrist with a wide range of views, depending on the issue. Here's a hint: In three of the last nine presidential elections, I did not vote for the Republican nominee. Indeed, in the 2024 presidential primaries, I supported RFK Jr. I actually worked as a volunteer on his campaign in my state. I trust you know enough about American politics to know that far-right Republicans loathe RFK Jr.
JFK assassination forums are wingnut magnets. Got it?
Yeah, wingnuts like you, who continually obsesses over the KGB, who repeatedly authors bizarre posts about the KGB's alleged role in the JFKA, and who accuses everyone who disagrees with him of being a willing KGB asset or a KGB dupe.
13
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: The Miracle On Elm Street
« Last post by Michael T. Griffith on Yesterday at 07:14:13 PM »I had to start this thread in response to something a Nutter posted on another thread insinuating that Arnold Rowland made up seeing the man with the rifle on the 6th floor of the TSBD building.
Of all the crazy things the Warren Commission has forced Nutters to believe this has to be right up there.
Barbara Rowland confirms her husband's account of seeing the man with the rifle at the southwestern end of the 6th floor of the TSBD building:
Mrs. ROWLAND. Well, my husband and I were talking about Mr. Stevenson’s visit and the way the people had acted, and we were talking about security measures, and he said he saw a man on the sixth floor of the School Book
Depository Building, and when I looked up there I didn’t see the man, because I didn’t know exactly what window he was talking about at first. And when I found out which window it was, the man had apparently stepped
back, because I didn’t see him.
Mr. BELIN. Which window was it?
Mrs. ROWLAND. It was the far left-hand window.
Mr. BELIN. As you face the building?
Mrs. ROWLAND. Yes.
Mr. BELIN. It would be the window to the south side of the building?
Mrs. ROWLAND. Yes.
Mr. BELIN. Would it be on the eastern part of the south side or the western part of the south side?
Mrs. ROWLAND. West.
Mr. BELIN. Would it be the farthermost west window?
Mrs. ROWLAND. Yes; the farthermost west pair of windows.
Mr. BELIN. The farthermost west pair of windows. What did your husband say to you?
Mrs. ROWLAND. Well, we assumed that it was a Secret Service man.
Mr. BELIN. But what did he say, if you remember?
Mrs. ROWLAND. He told me that he saw a man there who looked like he was holding a rifle, and that it must be a security man guarding the motorcade.
In the immediate aftermath of the shooting Rowland ran around telling every law enforcement officer he could find about the man with the rifle. He told three or four officials about this man before he gave his affidavit:
"...We stood there for a time talking about the security measures that were being made for the president’s visit in view of the recent trouble when Mr. Adelai Stevenson had been a recent visitor to Dallas. It must have been 5 or 10 minutes later when we were just looking at the surrounding buildings when I looked up at the Texas Book...building and noticed that the second floor from the top had two adjoining windows which were open, and upon looking I saw what I thought was a man standing back about 15 feet from the windows and was holding in his arms what appeared to be a hi powered rifle because it looked like it had a scope on it.
He appeared to be holding this at a parade rest sort of position. I mentioned this to my wife and merely made the remark that it must be the secret service men.
This man appeared to be a white man and appeared to have a light colored shirt on, open at the neck. He appeared to be of slender build and appeared to have dark hair. In about 15 minutes President Kennedy passed the spot where we were standing and the motorcade had just turned west on Elm heading down the hill when I heard a noise which I thought to be a back fire."
To imagine that Rowland invented this sighting is beyond belief as it would require the almost miraculous coincidence of him inventing a man (whose description closely matches that of other eyewitnesses) carrying a scoped, high-powered rifle on the 6th floor of the TSBD building.
What are the chances Rowland making up a white, slender male carrying a scoped, high-powered rifle on the 6th floor and it turns out that's exactly what happened?
ROLL UP, ROLL UP NUTTERS.
LET'S HEAR WHAT YOU HAVE TO SAY ABOUT THIS MATTER.
DON'T BE SHY.
DO YOU BELIEVE IN THE MIRACLE ON ELM STREET?
Yes, bullseye. Arnold Rowland was easily more credible than Howard Brennan, but the WC reached and strained for lame excuses to reject his account, yet they gobbled up Brennan's contradictory, problematic testimony.
14
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: 11.22 FBI Memo About an Secret Service Agent Finding a Bullet in the Limo
« Last post by Michael T. Griffith on Yesterday at 07:10:36 PM »https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/29948-re-paul-landis-112263-fbi-memo-confirms-for-schnapf/
Also see
https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=62266#relPageId=143&search=Rifle
I am afraid to put a copy of memo here---not sure about postimg and the new rules.
So, according to the FBI memo, there was word in the FBI that a Secret Service agent had found a bullet in the limo on 11.22.
That sounds like Landis.
I find it difficult to read this as referring to Landis. Landis said he didn't tell anyone about his finding of a bullet, and he said he took the bullet and a put it on a stretcher in Parkland. The Landis bullet would not have been reported as having been found in the limo.
However, the memo could be referring to the bullet that Chiefs Mills and Martinell found in the limo and brought to Dr. Young at the autopsy, since their search was allowed by the SS agents in the White House garage.
It makes more sense to me that the memo is referring to the bullet that Dr. Young said was found in the limo and brought to him at the autopsy.
So SS agent claimed to find a bullet in the limo. Two modest-sized bullet fragments were found in the limo after it arrived at the White House garage, but the SS said nothing about finding a bullet in the limo. The two fragments amounted to less than half the mass of a standard rifle bullet.
This is a very important memo because it definitely establishes that an extra bullet was found in the limo, a bullet that the lone-gunman theory cannot accommodate.
15
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Paul Landis And What He Said
« Last post by Royell Storing on Yesterday at 06:58:40 PM »Am I right that you think both Oswald and OJ did not kill anybody?
WRONG as usual.
16
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Alert to Duncan
« Last post by Duncan MacRae on Yesterday at 06:50:41 PM »I could be wrong but I don't think this is an AI issue. Something similar happened a few months ago when it wouldn't let met type the word "shot". It must have thought I was dotting the "o". When I alerted Duncan, he corrected the problem. I'm guessing there is a list of naughty words that are verboten and posts are checked against. Maybe Duncan can shed some light as to how this actually works.
I've posted F-i-n-c-k's name in the past with no problems but suddenly, it's getting auto-corrected.
Fixed
17
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Alert to Duncan
« Last post by John Corbett on Yesterday at 06:49:14 PM »Is it possible auto-correct though you were trying to be sneaky and spell the ‘F’ word differently? These a.i. checkers can be real prudes. Try Dr. Chink and see what happens lol
I could be wrong but I don't think this is an AI issue. Something similar happened a few months ago when it wouldn't let met type the word "shot". It must have thought I was dotting the "o". When I alerted Duncan, he corrected the problem. I'm guessing there is a list of naughty words that are verboten and posts are checked against. Maybe Duncan can shed some light as to how this actually works.
I've posted F-i-n-c-k's name in the past with no problems but suddenly, it's getting auto-corrected.
18
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Paul Landis And What He Said
« Last post by Mark A. Oblazney on Yesterday at 06:46:00 PM »Ultimate CT authority Jumbo Jim posted a piece about this on the beloved Kennedy Sand King, uh, place. Some guy named Hernandez wrote it. Big Jim actually interviewed me a few years ago for his rag about why Soledad O’Brien didn’t use me for her podcast on Mary Pinchot.
19
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: 11.22 FBI Memo About an Secret Service Agent Finding a Bullet in the Limo
« Last post by John Corbett on Yesterday at 06:43:57 PM »Far be it for me to post Facts in the face of your repeated Fiction.
Posting facts is indeed far from you.
20
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Paul Landis And What He Said
« Last post by John Corbett on Yesterday at 06:42:46 PM »I give you credit for being consistent. Consistently Wrong!
Am I right that you think both Oswald and OJ did not kill anybody?