Jarman said:


"And, after we was inside the building after that, I heard that Oswald had came [sic] down through the office and came down the front stairs and he was stopped by the officer that had stopped us and sent us back in the building and Mr. Truddy [sic] told them that that was alright, that he worked here, so then, he proceeded own [sic] out the building and we wondered why he stopped us."


Corbett is having visible trouble answering...

When Jarman details that Oswald had "came down through the office" and "was stopped by the officer that has stopped us" he gives information that is backed by Mrs Reid witnessing Oswald walking through the 2nd Floor Offices before going down the SE staircase...

Corbett has a real dilemma here because the only place the cop who stopped Jarman and the other negro employees could be is in the Lobby by the front door because Truly & Baker never stopped those workers on the 2nd Floor...

The wording also connotes that after Oswald was stopped by that officer that Oswald then walked out the front door and down the front steps and out of the building...There's no doubt that is what Jarman means and he even adds that it made him wonder why the cop stopped him if he had allowed Oswald to leave...The context is clearly referencing being told all this by Lovelady...

So you have a problem here because Jarman makes clear all this happened with a un-named cop at the front door...A cop that had stopped him and his black co-workers...And a cop that then also stopped Oswald but then (allegedly) let him leave...

Not only did the FBI and Warren Commission do zero investigation in to this but the HSCA also unaccountably showed no interest in Lovelady with-holding evidence and committing perjury...

I would agree.  That is why it is inconceivable that this was not part of that visible reaction:

In which frame did JFK start to visibility react?

Delusional as usual.

You called for the references...Were given them...And then name-called instead of answering what they showed...

Lovelady committed perjury, by your own evidence, when he said he did not see Oswald after the elevator and then told Jarman he saw Oswald leave through the front door...HSCA showed no interest in Lovelady changing his story and basically admitting he with-held evidence...They showed no interest because they knew it was a powder keg they didn't want to touch...

What you are avoiding answering here, Mr Corbett, is that Lovelady saw Harvey try to leave through the front door and getting stopped by the un-named cop at the front door, and being forced to come back inside to the Lobby...This makes sense because the Martin Film shows Lovelady has separated from Shelley at this point and was on the outside steps...

We know Lovelady was lying and covering for CIA Shelley because Mr Truly was not back down to the Lobby from the upper floors when this occurred...It was actually Shelley who intervened as Oswald's "Superintendent" and OK-ed him, but "Oswald" was then told to step aside and wait by the un-named cop...Shelley then assisted "Oswald" out the rear Loading Dock exit...Lovelady's whole purpose in telling this lie to Jarman is to cover-up Shelley OK-ing Oswald in the Lobby and replace him with Truly...

Jarman then proceeds to do exactly what Holmes did and conflates the "OK-ed by Truly and walked on down the stairs", that happened in the 2nd Floor Lunch Room, with walking out the front door and down the front stairs...This mixing and muddling of the two stops by cops is being done intentionally so they can be conflated in to one stop by a cop during the Lunch Room Encounter in order to lose this dangerous stopping of Oswald by a cop in the Lobby and Shelley's bailing him out...

If you read Bojczuk's final summation at the bottom of the quote he realizes this was a second stop by a second cop in the Lobby...

The Education Forum is trying its hardest to keep this explosive break-through from the board...

The only disagreement is to when the shot was fired that JBC and Willis reacted to. Thut's not surprising given the missed shot provided no definitive proof as to when it was fired. There is agreement that JBC is seen reacting to a gunshot. There is also agreement between Tom and myself that you are totally clueless. Holland would probably agree too if he even knew who you were.

You think I am clueless, but you don't speak for Tom.  Tom thinks I am a jerk.  I think that both of you have little experience examining evidence in real cases.

Jeremy Bojczuk - Education Forum 2019:


" Jarman's remarks were in an interview, unpublished as far as I can tell, given on 25 September 1977 to William Brown and Albert Maxwell. There is a transcript online at https://www.thenewdisease.space/james-jarman-hsca . This is the relevant portion:

  Quote
 

And, after we was inside the building after that, I heard that Oswald had came [sic] down through the office and came down the front stairs and he was stopped by the officer that had stopped us and sent us back in the building and Mr. Truddy [sic] told them that that was alright, that he worked here, so then, he proceeded own [sic] out the building and we wondered why he stopped us.

...

Well, there was a billy love lady [sic] standing out there, he was on the steps, see.

...

And, Oswald was coming out the door and he [Lovelady] said the police had stopped Oswald and sent him back in the building, billy love lady [sic] said that Mr. Trudy [sic] told the policeman that Oswald was alright, that he worked there, so Oswald walked on down the stairs.

 

It looks as though Oswald's encounter with a policeman by the front doors took place some time after Marrion Baker's encounter on the third or fourth floor with someone who did not match Oswald's description. As Vanessa points out, the fact that Jarman was quoting Lovelady, who was certainly on the steps during the shooting, adds credence to his account. "

Delusional as usual.