JFK Assassination Forum

James Gordon was the owner, and just told us a couple of years ago he wasn't going to have any more dealings with it,and was going to let it go. he did not care what would happen to it.Sandy was head of funding but has passed. Simkin was back, but since James refused to sign it over to anyone, the Forum was unable to remain.

While I see that Dr. Niederhut was a problem to many of you, the sad part of the Forum's absence was that for years, many JFK authors etc, had posted there. Whether LN or CT, that Forum was a great resource.

I have been gone for quite awhile, and just received an email from one of the Admins that it was gone.  I wish it would have been archived, at least. 

They say the internet is forever, but I don't know how to retrieve it. Invision will not let anyone but Gordon make decisions on it, and God only knows where he is.

Kathy, W Niederhut is a pox on that forum based on the catch up reading I have been doing. Hard to believe someone let him run amok for so long like that. Do you believe James Gordon could have passed away ?

Oh boy more lectures about logic from Michael T Griffith, who believes all the evidence is fake. Absurd!

I thought this thread was supposed to be about applying logic and critical thinking? It appears that a more apt title would have been Rehashing the Same Old Crap.

It's a 62  year old murder case. If we didn't rehash old crap, what else would there be to talk about?

Given the circumstances of the JFKA, a logical supposition would be that Oswald did not expect to survive (and perhaps didn't care if he did).

That's something I beleive but not something I know. Nobody knows what Oswald was thinking.

He was clearly thinking in this vein with the Walker attempt, which was vastly less risky.  If this were true, his failure to leave some sort of manifesto or at least a note is puzzling to me as I have previously stated.

Why do people think that there was a rule book Oswald was supposed to follow. He had his reasons for doing what he did and didn't do. He was under no obligation to tell anybody what those reasons were.

Extremely puzzling, in fact. Once he survived and was in custody, bragging about his deed would not have been in his legal or ideological interests.

I see no point n wondering why Oswald didn't do what I think I would have done if I was in his shoes.

It appears to me that the wheels started turning immediately, which is why he wanted Communist Party showman Abt to represent him. My guess is that he was thinking in terms of a grand show trial that would cement his place in history as a hero of the Cuban people and a deep Marxist thinker.

You are certainly entitled to guess. Your guess might even be right. In fact, I hope it is. I hope he was looking forward to his trial. It means Oswald got robbed of the infamy he thought he would gain. At least, he didn't get to live to enjoy it, thanks to Jack Ruby. I wonder if Oswald's last conscious thought was, "Life is so damn unfair". I chuckle just thinking about it.

Having now read all three of Fred's pieces, that is indeed an amazing 180-degree transformation. I still have to believe it is a combination of the seeds having been there long before the transformation and of religious influences of which we may not be fully aware. There is no way the events in Gaza triggered this sort of wholesale about-face.

It is called a fictional story. Maybe your rifle has a point on the bridge, but none of the others do.

Where two circles meet [collide] is a single point. Below is a better image of CE 543. The mouth definitely isn’t flared out. And the dent appears to fit the blue arc of a circle roughly the diameter of the outside of the bridge.