Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1

You can go to Bart Kamp's Prayer Man website and read his Hosty Notes section and see the notes passed muster with Pat Speer and Malcolm Blunt...The notes were posted in Hosty's book 'Assignment Oswald' and compare to other examples of Hosty's handwriting...I don't think anyone has ever challenged the authenticity of the notes being Hosty's...

This fraud has been assisted by individuals like Rob Clark, Robbie Robertson, Eli Frame, Tim Gardner, and Len Osanic...The aforementioned are persons, who although they have a modicum of assassination knowledge, all host Kamp in a fan-like manner and never question his offerings...They always host Kamp in an unquestioning way where there is no adversarial opposition to keep Kamp honest...They are persons who have the skill to put together a podcast but then host Kamp is a sycophantic manner where his claims are supported without any critical cross examination...I have been mocked and ridiculed by all the previously mentioned podcast hosts (Osanic put me on mute) because I refuted Kamp's Prayer Man theory...The reason for this is those podcast hosts rely on gang-like grouping up and favoritism in order to compensate for their lack of research skill that led to them backing the hoax researcher Kamp and his bogus Prayer Man theory...They operate like a pack of school yard bullies who use Kamp as a leg up in the research world...They don't care if the evidence shows Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...Again, the clique serves to [/i]prevent good research more than encourage it no matter how much they flatter themselves on censorship protected sites...

Pat Speer used the fact I can't defend myself to mock my not being allowed back on The Education Forum...He humiliated me and made me look like an idiot who didn't pass muster who was justly denied...A "sorry Charlie" kind of thing that he took pleasure in doing while defending the clique...He then lied and said I stole my Prayer Man stuff from him and falsely used it as reasoning why I wasn't fit for membership on The Education Forum...The Prayer Man people are fully aware my Prayer Man material is quite my own and many orders of magnitude better than Speer's weak offerings...In fact my material is subject-leading and quite conclusive...The Prayer Man clique is dirty and won't correct Speer on his slanderous false accusation...These are the site's preferred members and methods...

When I Private Messaged Ciphered Past to request fair air time to defend myself I was threatened with legal action for harassment and stalking...And this was for a simple fair playing field reply request on my first contact on a public podcast that always includes the invitation for the public to contact them and add information they think would be helpful on each episode...They request correcting information that would help the show and then when you reach out to them, after being unfairly slandered and ridiculed on the air, their first response is to threaten you with legal charges...Bush league hacks and clique boys running a bully club...
2
I've been reading MTG's crap for 35 years and the word "legitimate" never crossed my mind. He keeps recycling the same old debunked BS he was trying to sell way back in the early 1990s. He's still trying to polish the same old turds. His work never has and never will amount to a hill of beans. It will be forgotten soon after he goes belly up. The WC will remain the definitive account of the JFKA. It has stood the test of time and will continue to do so even as misinformed people continue to reject it. 

Just what has the CT community done collectively over the past six decades. Has it produced any credible evidence that anyone other than Oswald took part in the assassination. A big fat NO. Some have pointed the finger of suspicion at various individuals or groups but have never been able to back it up with actual evidence. All they can do is invent lame excuses for rejecting the findings of the WC. Those efforts have been about as effective as shooting spit wads at tanks. History has recorded that Oswald was the assassin and will continue to do so long after any of us have passed on. Nothing has changed and nothing ever will. It has been 62 years of futility and still counting.

History has recorded that some people believe Oswald was the assassin without being able to provide a shred of persuasive evidence for it

There, I fixed it for you.

Now, mr. know-it-all, why don't simply try to answer the question about the wallet(s)? Could it be you are clueless?
3
Does anyone else have a different theory as to why some of the occupants of either limo did not seem to hear or react to Oswald's early missed shot.

Because there wasn't one.

 Yes there was.  According to John Connally.  On the CBS news special "The Warren Report", Connally clearly states that just after the turn onto Elm Street he heard a rifle shot, and turned to his right.  This statement alone proves there was an early shot. He said he didn't hear the shot that hit him, which would be the 2nd shot, which struck both he and President Kennedy.  He heard the 3rd and final shot and felt the results of it.  So Connally heard a total of 2 shots.  Furthermore, evidence that backs up Connally's statements of the earlier shot are the quick, 1/4 of a second head turn he made.  Connally was looking to his right, turned to look to his left, and SUDDENLY snaps his head back to his right, and his head remains in that position until he changes his position for the first time since head turn to the right in 1/4 of a second in frame 224 pf the Zapruder film.  He gaze to the right is transfixed until his face becomes distorted when he's struck around frame 222.  This is all captured in the Zapruder film.
4
...and the dolling out your BS is pretty self-explanatory in itself. No A-I is needed.
 
meanwhile....Michael T Griffith fills this forum with legitimate questions and doubts about the case.
His postings are backed up by solid documents, statements, and testimony. He continues posting in the face of your blatant insults.
His work will remain here as a testament to his dedication to the truth. John Corbett; not so much

Here are just a few of your "greatest hits" in reply;

I've been reading MTG's crap for 35 years and the word "legitimate" never crossed my mind. He keeps recycling the same old debunked BS he was trying to sell way back in the early 1990s. He's still trying to polish the same old turds. His work never has and never will amount to a hill of beans. It will be forgotten soon after he goes belly up. The WC will remain the definitive account of the JFKA. It has stood the test of time and will continue to do so even as misinformed people continue to reject it. 

Just what has the CT community done collectively over the past six decades. Has it produced any credible evidence that anyone other than Oswald took part in the assassination. A big fat NO. Some have pointed the finger of suspicion at various individuals or groups but have never been able to back it up with actual evidence. All they can do is invent lame excuses for rejecting the findings of the WC. Those efforts have been about as effective as shooting spit wads at tanks. History has recorded that Oswald was the assassin and will continue to do so long after any of us have passed on. Nothing has changed and nothing ever will. It has been 62 years of futility and still counting. 
5
I am not going anywhere. Laughing at and pointing out how stupid the concept of an early missed shot really is, brightens mundane days.

My new favorite post is how reliant you are on the Zapruder Film for knowledge, but you aren't even able to determine when the early missed shot took place. It just did.

Troll
6
Go away, troll.

I am not going anywhere. Laughing at and pointing out how stupid the concept of an early missed shot really is, brightens mundane days.

My new favorite post is how reliant you are on the Zapruder Film for knowledge, but you aren't even able to determine when the early missed shot took place. It just did.
7
I figured out the JFKA a long time ago. The CTs are still grasping at straws.

The AI definition of the phrase "grasping at straws" perfectly defines the CT efforts over the past six decades:

The phrase "grasping at straws" means to make a desperate attempt to save oneself or succeed in a situation where the chances are very slim, often by resorting to unlikely or flimsy solutions

It can also refer to trying desperately to support an argument with irrelevant points

Essentially, it describes a futile effort to find a solution when all options seem ineffective

I figured out the JFKA a long time ago.

No you didn't, but you are simply too superficial to ever figure that out.

You can't even provide a plausible answer for a question that is 100% based on the available evidence.
8
Dear Jack "Ignoramus" Nissan,

Between Z-140 and Z-150, five people in the limo, three Secret Service agents in the follow-up car, and running girl Rosemary Willis turned their heads rapidly in response to Oswald's first, missing-everything, shot at "Z-124."

Dear Jack "Ignoramus" Nessan,

Jack Ready's job was to keep an eye on JFK, not to lean over and move his head around like a bobblehead doll.

To see if JFK was okay after Oswald's first shot, Glen Bennett had to look around Dave Powers in the jump seat. That's what we see Bennett doing starting around Z-150.

One would think George Hickey's job didn't entail his bending over as though he was barfing, but that's what he did (bend over like he was barfing) starting around Z-145.

Both Ready and Hickey said the first shot sounded like a firecracker.

John Connally recognized it as a high-powered rifle shot.

Dear Jack "Ignoramus" Nessan,

The important thing is that Oswald's first shot was early and it missed everything.

D'oh!


Jack Ready's job was to keep an eye on JFK, not to lean over and move his head around like a bobblehead doll.


So, while you are sitting in your chair in front of the mirror and wiping the clown makeup from your face you come up with the idea that the Secret Service was not there to surveille the crowd but to stare at JFK in case he is shot so they can write an accurate report afterwards? Who would have thought it.

Other than point out the Secret Service was not there to protect JFK, you have not supplied one scintilla of evidence of an early missed shot. Absolutely nothing, but don't let that stop you from pretending it is all true.

9
   Not that I know of...I have been telling Kamp for 10 years that he is misrepresenting the context of Hosty's notes that he is showing...Kamp dishonestly insists that the notes show that Oswald was out on the front steps during the assassination as Prayer Man and he is presenting this as conclusive proof...If you observe Fritz and Bookhout's notes Fritz's inclusion of "When Officer Came In" calibrates the notes to 90 seconds after the shots when Baker confronted Oswald in the 2nd Floor Lunch Room...Once a dubious researcher like Kamp makes such a complex false claim it is difficult to undo it because it takes so much correction...However it is easy to see that all 3 sets of notes from the 3pm Interrogation all start at 90 seconds after the shots at the Lunch Room Encounter...All 3 go downstairs to eat lunch, and all 3 then go out with Shelley on the front steps...Therefore the part of Hosty's notes quoted by Kamp occurs 4 minutes after the shots and cannot be used as evidence for Oswald being Prayer Man...Kamp is quite aware of this but he dishonestly ignores it and in doing so has tied up the entire research community in a BS theory fully endorsed by the fool Jim DiEugenio...When Hosty writes "Went out to watch Presidential Parade" he is talking about 4 minutes after the shots...Kamp is clearly committing a false reference there and refuses to listen to the correct interpretation...He has a whole internet of supporters who help him with this deliberate deception...

The true interpretation is seen in Fritz's testimony to the Commission where he told Ball that Oswald told them he was eating a cheese sandwich and apple in the 2nd Floor Lunch Room during the assassination...Obviously, Oswald told this to the 3pm Interrogation and this is why the notes were torn up and the lie was formulated that they took no notes Texas style...Oswald told the 3pm Interrogation that he was eating lunch in the 2nd Floor Lunch Room during the assassination and that caused a major problem that was solved by the present notes that conspicuously omit this admission like an obvious glaring donut hole exactly in the right place in the existing notes...Fritz, Bookhout, and Hosty solved this problem by starting their notes 90 seconds after the shots at the Lunch Room Encounter and therefore omitting Oswald being in the in the Lunch Room during the assassination right before it...When you look at the existing notes you can't unsee this...Fritz, Bookhout, and Hosty all clumsily excised this admission from their notes and it stands out like a sore thumb...It is this correct explanation that Kamp refuses to allow and in doing so, and sticking to his bogus Prayer Man theory, both he and DiEugenio, and the sycophants who support them, are holding up a final solving of the conspiracy...

All 3 sets of notes wrote about being with Shelley out front in vague terms because Oswald was covering up the fact Shelley helped him around the cop at the front door who told Oswald to step aside and stay put...Shelley saw Oswald was in trouble and helped him around the police detainment at the front door and out the back...So the 3pm Interrogation notes had two major problems they needed to bury and what you see is how they did it...They simply removed Oswald telling them he was eating lunch in the 2nd Floor Lunch Room during the shots...And they blurred Shelley helping Oswald out the rear exit after a cop told him to step aside at the front door...Kamp helps muddy all this and serves to inhibit the solving of the case because he can't break off his juvenile attachment to this Prayer Man BS...

   Why were the alleged "Hosty Notes" NOT verified? This should have been Step 1 after the Notes were allegedly discovered by Kamp. Once again, the JFK Assassination Research Community has fallen on its' Bahookie.
10
I figured out the JFKA a long time ago. The CTs are still grasping at straws.

The AI definition of the phrase "grasping at straws" perfectly defines the CT efforts over the past six decades:

The phrase "grasping at straws" means to make a desperate attempt to save oneself or succeed in a situation where the chances are very slim, often by resorting to unlikely or flimsy solutions

It can also refer to trying desperately to support an argument with irrelevant points

Essentially, it describes a futile effort to find a solution when all options seem ineffective

...and the dolling out your BS is pretty self-explanatory in itself. No A-I is needed.
 
meanwhile....Michael T Griffith fills this forum with legitimate questions and doubts about the case.
His postings are backed up by solid documents, statements, and testimony. He continues posting in the face of your blatant insults.
His work will remain here as a testament to his dedication to the truth. John Corbett; not so much

Here are just a few of your "greatest hits" in reply;

Quote
Total BS.
Quote
Because of a confused witness.
Quote
No, the error is in your FUBAR figuring. As long as you have been analyzing the evidence in this case, it's amazing how bad you are at it.
Quote
Oh, goody for you. You caught one of my typos. I bet that made your day.
Quote
I think you had already posted plenty of nonsense. You didn't need to add on.




Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10