Oh! Okay! Ah-ha! So in a tightly controlled work environment where everyone in the main work area in each section worked in view of others, no one noticed that Oswald skipped out for least 25-minutes, even though Oswald was a trainee, huh?

The post office where the money order was bought was 11 blocks from Jaggers-Chiles-Stovall. Assuming that Oswald speed-walked to the post office, that he didn't have to wait in line, and that it took him no more than 2-3 minutes to fill out the money order and have it processed and given to him -- assuming all these things, he would have been gone from his work table at least 25 minutes.

 

2 to 3 minutes at Dallas Post Office, conservatively.
7.5 to 8.5 minutes to briskly walk half a mile.

So yeah, 10 to 12 minutes late. BFD!





JohnM

Dude, he says he's only 14, so his brain is still in development.  Hey, Matt, do you like, use A.I. and stuff like à lot of users here use ?           Thou art all wise, Duncan (all genuflect here lol)

From the following film footage recorded at the Ervay Street post office in November 1962;

"we'll handle about 160,000 packages here today when as a matter of fact the largest day of the season will be twice that almost."

That's just packages. The total number of items of mail handled in a year back then was in the hundreds of millions. Houston handled 878 million pieces in 1961.

https://www.congress.gov/87/crecb/1962/01/23/GPO-CRECB-1962-pt1-8-2.pdf

We've always known that Griffith isn't the sharpest tool in the shed but now his deductive reasoning skills have reached a new low! As shown in your video, it's a simple fact that every day, Post Offices handle a huge amount of mail/packages, heck, every time I visit my local suburban Post Office there's always a queue almost out the door.
And expecting a random postal worker to specifically remember one transaction from eight months previous, and considering that the postal worker has potentially had thousands of interactions in the interim is total insanity. And then thinking that this lack of memory of some unimportant obscure event from hundreds of days ago somehow advances your paranoid delusions of a conspiracy is, well, beyond desperate.

Oswald ordered, purchased, was sent and possessed C2766! 



And get this, Griffith completely misrepresents the HSCA's photographic findings by insisting that microscopic differences in tiny backyard photos somehow correlates to microscopic movements of Oswald's camera!? What a Goofball.



JohnM

On some counts, Trump is unfairly accused.

LOL!

MG: Another problem with the connection between Oswald and the Carcano is that nobody at Oswald's post office reported giving him a hefty package such as the kind in which a rifle would be shipped (Summers, p. 59; Meagher, p. 50). In fact, none of those postal workers reported ever giving Oswald any kind of a package.

I think this revealing statement is worth some additional comments. It is part of Exhibit A of your discrediting extreme bias and lack of critical thinking. You didn't even bother to see if I provided any evidence to support my statement.

It was pretty much a given that you had not.

You accusing someone of extreme bias and lack of critical thinking is like Hitler accusing someone of antisemitism.

When I read a lone-gunman article or book, I don't stop as soon as I encounter a claim that I consider to be invalid, even absurdly invalid. I keep reading so as to ensure I understand why the author believes the claim.

Now, would it not have been a basic, crucial investigative procedure to at least attempt to see if anyone at the post office recalled giving a large package to Oswald, or even if any postal worker merely recalled receiving a package from Klein's? Right? Isn't this a no-brainer? I mean, Crime Investigation 101 would include at least trying to establish these things, wouldn't you think? Of course it would, but it was never done.

How many packages do you suppose your typical postal employee would handle in the course of even one month? Do you really think any of them would have remembered giving Oswald a package 8 months earlier? This is typical of the red herring issues CTs raise because they have no real evidence to support their beliefs.

The above response is an example of what critical thinking looks like.