Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
It's remarkable how candid the WC was about the possibility of only two shots:

"The consensus among the witnesses at the scene was that three shots were fired. However, some heard only two shots, while others testified that they heard four and perhaps as many as five or six shots. ... The physical and other evidence examined by the Commission compels the conclusion that at least two shots were fired. ... It is possible that the assassin carried an empty shell in the rifle and fired only two shots, with the witnesses hearing multiple noises made by the same shot. ... The eyewitness testimony may be subconsciously colored by the extensive publicity given the conclusion that three shots were fired."

Of course, as previously stated this was not the WC going out on any limb because, if anything, the two-shot scenario makes the LN narrative even less problematical.

Here is a fine example two witnesses heard the frontal shot and were convinced to change their story.

2
It's remarkable how candid the WC was about the possibility of only two shots:

"The consensus among the witnesses at the scene was that three shots were fired. However, some heard only two shots, while others testified that they heard four and perhaps as many as five or six shots. ... The physical and other evidence examined by the Commission compels the conclusion that at least two shots were fired. ... It is possible that the assassin carried an empty shell in the rifle and fired only two shots, with the witnesses hearing multiple noises made by the same shot. ... The eyewitness testimony may be subconsciously colored by the extensive publicity given the conclusion that three shots were fired."

Of course, as previously stated this was not the WC going out on any limb because, if anything, the two-shot scenario makes the LN narrative even less problematical.
3
There is zero forensic, medical, or eyewitness evidence of a gunman on the GK. Nothing but a bunch of people who thought the shots sounded like they came from that direction. Another bunch of people said the shots sounded like they came from the direction of the TSBD. There is forensic evidence and eyewitnesses who corroborate the latter group. There is zero corroboration to support the former.

John, you are once again absolutely correct. Cute that people here are still using Lee Bowers to support the notion of a shot from the front..
4
Norman was correct there were 3 shots from the TSBD, but also one from the GK. For whatever reason many did not hear the first, but Connally did.

Brehm missed hearing the first shot that missed, but heard three shots with the first being Z-223. See how frustrating this case is.

To reiterate:

1. Norman testified the first shot was when JFK got past the window, and JFK "slumped or something." So the shot that missed caused JFK to "slump or something?" Does this not sound more like the supposed second shot?

2. Williams testified he "really didn't pay any attention" to the first shot (from right above his head?) but the second shot "sounded like it was right in the building" (meaning the first didn't?).

3. Jarman testified he thought the first shot was a backfire or a policeman saluting JFK and "didn't think too much about it" (even though it was actually a high-powered rifle being fired from inside the building right above his head?).

Consistent with the two-shot scenario, this sounds to me like the folks directly below Oswald may have been descrbing a sound that many earwitnesses seem to have heard that was in fact not Oswald firing an early missed shot.
5
Does that really make sense to you?

Not really. However, since Royell notices things like the Lamb Chops puppet, I wanted to contribute to see how far the rabbit hole goes😬
6
Why does the JFK Assassination attract so many MAGATs?
What is the  problem TG? Did that other forum ridicule your Z124 1st shot theory too? Are you not leftist MAGA ( Make America Go Away ) enough for them?
7
    Above, this Bogus Motorcycle Cop is WEARING 1 GLOVE. We have no idea what happened to his missing glove. The object we see him holding in his (L) hand is rigid. That object maintains a consistent form/shape as he walks past Officer Harkness.  A "glove" would Not do this. A glove would flop around with each step he takes. We do Not see this object doing that.
    Also, when this Bogus Motorcycle Cop was previously filmed wearing 1 glove while walking along the string of passenger train cars, he was Not holding this object in his (L) hand. He produced the object we see in his (L) hand, AFTER the train car sequence on the Darnell Film. You mentioned, "...so that his fellow conspirators could identify him". I believe that the object we NOW see in his (L) hand, as he approaches the TSBD and the "getaway" Car, is going to do just that. The object he is holding in his (L) hand will ID him as a FRIENDLY to, ".........his fellow conspirators".

I didn't think it was possible but your empty speculation gets more and more ridiculous as time goes on. Conspirators holding special "objects" so as to identify them as "friendly" to their other conspirators? Imaginary policemen mingling freely among real policemen and nobody notices or says a word? Delusional!
8
You have absolutely NO IDEA what you are talking about.

This phrase should be Royell Storing's middle name. Surely it's fitting for someone who makes up a "getaway car" and has absolutely zero evidence that connects it to the JFK assassination. Active imagination you have!
9
"Trump Derangement Syndrome" perfectly describes what MAGATS, who, like Trump, simply can't accept the fact that he lost the 2020 election, are suffering from.

Trump didn't lose the 2020 election democrats forged more than enough "ballots" to win. Look how bad things got in those four years $7.00 for a dozen eggs. My local store has them on sale for $.79 this week.
10
What we need is funding to find a cure for TDS.

Absolutely. Trump is the best President we had in my lifetime.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10