Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1


I guess that's as articulate a response as any.
2
As I stated on another thread, when I bought my 30-06 in Phoenix in 1976 out of the classified ads in the Arizona Republic, the seller and I met in the parking lot of Park Central Mall as a mutually convenient spot. I simply gave him the cash and he gave me the rifle. Possibly we introduced ourselves as Lance and Vladimir, but I don't recall even that. People who didn't live in a state like Arizona or Texas in the 1960's and 1970's perhaps have no idea the extent to which buying and selling guns was no more complex than buying and selling golf clubs or baby strollers. Yes, the gun would be identifiable by serial number, but tracing it would be a hell of a project.

There is no federal law requiring records being kept for sales between individuals. Gun dealers have been required to keep records of gun purchases since 1938. The fact Oswald decided to purchase a rifle via mail order rather than from a private seller is evidence of nothing. Trying to read Oswald's mind an any point in time is a futile effort.
3
While I'm off in the ozone anyway, I virtually never see it discussed why Oswald would have felt he was obligated to shoot JFK from the cramped, exceedingly risky, difficult-to-escape-from 6th floor of the TSBD. OK, you've decided to shoot JFK. No one pays any attention to what you're doing anyway, and the event is during the lunch hour. Disappear a few minutes early with your curtain rods, ascend to the roof of the Dal-Tex building or wherever, do the deed, and blend back into the crowd. By all accounts, it would have been an easier shot. Ba-da-boom, ba-da-bing.
4

I don’t remember reading that, but I will take your word for it. Also, remember that he still had the Alek Hidell IDs on him when he was arrested. That seems to me to possibly point toward him wanting the rifle to be traced to himself.

Liebeler asked her about this since he had left behind so much incriminating evidence:

Mr. LIEBELER. Did it seem strange to you at the time, Marina, that Lee did make these careful plans, take pictures, and write it up in a notebook, and then when he went out to shoot at General Walker he left all that incriminating evidence fight in the house so that if he had ever been stopped and questioned and if that notebook had been found, it would have clearly indicated that he was the one that shot at General Walker?
Mrs. OSWALD. He was such a person that nothing seems peculiar to me for what he did. I had so many surprises from him that nothing surprised me. He may have wished to appear such a brave man or something.
Mr. LIEBELER. Did you ever have the feeling that he really wanted to be caught in connection with the Walker affair?
Mrs. OSWALD. I don't know how to answer that--maybe yes and maybe no. I couldn't read his mind.

The McMillan book goes over in great detail the Walker attempt. Viz., how Marina knew based on his erratic behavior that he was up so something. About a month before the attempt he ordered her to write the Soviet Embassy asking to be let back in. She didn't want to go back but he forced her to. Again, he was planning on abandoning them again. Shortly before the attempt the beatings got worse (the neighbors complained to the landlord about it). Oddly after the attempt she said he destroyed some papers - the maps he had - but kept others. Why some but not all? Maybe the more incriminating evidence but not other?
5
A more cautionary tale than NiederNut is the late David Ray Griffin. He was a longtime professor at Claremont, one of the premier theological schools in the nation. He was the  leading modern exponent of Alfred North Whitehead's "process theology," which is not for dummies. He wrote numerous books and huge numbers of scholarly articles, even the titles of which were hard for a layman to follow. He was 10,000 times more prominent in his field than NiederNut is in his. And, yet, late in life he became one of the leading voices of the 9/11 Truth movement. I was agog. At least he had the "rationality" to attribute 9/11 to Bush-Cheney and not Mossad.

Cases like these should give some pause to those at the lunatic fringe end of the CT spectrum. Some of your leading voices, notwithstanding their apparent credentials, are seriously off. One red flag with characters like NiederNut is the scope of their nuttiness. The JFKA was an elaborate conspiracy, 9/11 was an elaborate conspiracy, and God knows what else. And everyone who thnks otherwise is a "cognitive infiltrator" (disinformation agent) planted by the government. I will give NiederNut credit for making me look up Cass Sunstein, one of his household gods, which I had to do after he suggested I was one of them there cognitive infiltrators (which I am, of course, but on a strictly freelance basis for my own amusement).
6
There is also the possibility, addressed in Marina's WC testimony, that he wanted to be caught.


I don’t remember reading that, but I will take your word for it. Also, remember that he still had the Alek Hidell IDs on him when he was arrested. That seems to me to possibly point toward him wanting the rifle to be traced to himself.
7
Calling the medical board about him is kinda a genius idea Lance! But I agree that this fella seems unhinged.

And I would know, because I had a wacko on (believe it or not) the forum of the International Association for Near-Death Studies report ME to the Arizona State Bar for basically "hurting her feelings." The Bar explained that this was not really a matter within their jurisdiction, but every lawyer knows that ANY complaint to the Bar is not to be taken lightly. With NiederNut, I think he's pretty elderly and I don't think he has much of an active practice, so I decided to let it go.
8

On second thought, perhaps LHO intentionally wanted the rifle to be traced to himself. He apparently wanted to leave his Walker attempt planning records for the “historical record”. So, why not make it apparent that the revolver and rifle both belonged to himself also?

There is also the possibility, addressed in Marina's WC testimony, that he wanted to be caught.
9
As I stated on another thread, when I bought my 30-06 in Phoenix in 1976 out of the classified ads in the Arizona Republic, the seller and I met in the parking lot of Park Central Mall as a mutually convenient spot. I simply gave him the cash and he gave me the rifle. Possibly we introduced ourselves as Lance and Vladimir, but I don't recall even that. People who didn't live in a state like Arizona or Texas in the 1960's and 1970's perhaps have no idea the extent to which buying and selling guns was no more complex than buying and selling golf clubs or baby strollers. Yes, the gun would be identifiable by serial number, but tracing it would be a hell of a project.


On second thought, perhaps LHO intentionally wanted the rifle to be traced to himself. He apparently wanted to leave his Walker attempt planning records for the “historical record”. So, why not make it apparent that the revolver and rifle both belonged to himself also?
10
As someone who is just catching up with what goes on over there, my jaw is kinda on the floor. I echo the kudos to Duncan for running a forum free of the seemingly looney behavior at the other spot.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10