JFK Assassination Forum

Your comments sound remarkably similar to those who thought the United States should not become involved in WWII. You are "100% supportive of Ukraine" as long as your support doesn't affect you and the price of eggs. There is no way that Zelensky would lose an election. Literally all of Europe views the Ukrainian situation far more seriously and consequentially than you apparently do. Yes, Europe has allowed itself to become militarily weak and overly dependent on the U.S., but the U.S. has cheerfully contributed to that situation for decades; writing off Ukraine at this point is not the solution to that problem. I happen to have had breakfast with a State Department official in Minsk in 2007 who cited Ukraine as the shining example of what the former Soviet republics could become. Now, in the view of Trump cultists it's "screw 'em, they're just part of Putin's sphere of influence (whatever the hell that means) anyway." In my opinion, Trump cultists are absolutely no different from the TDS cult; it's just two crazy cults screeching past each other.

Then have an election.  The situation in Ukraine is nothing like WWII.  The Russians did not bomb Pearl Harbor.  There are legitimate reasons to avoid these endless regional conflicts.  There are conflicts in Africa and other places that get no such publicity.  This is emotion driven by our media because they associate Putin with Trump.  The US is not the policeman of the world.  We have no obligation to right every wrong even if that were possible.  And it is not in many such conflicts.  Send as much money as we can print, bomb them to the stone age, and the next day nothing will be any different.  Europe has a much greater interest in this conflict than us.  Let them step up. 

Because I have no echnida in this fight and think the entire Imposter Haygood lunacy is, well, lunacy, I am compelled to point out that old Clyde Haygood apparently was wrong when he identified himself in the photo known as Bond 4. I don't know about you, but I'm demanding my money back. I might let it slide if I'd just bought one, but I bought ten at a cost of over $1000. The Robin Unger gallery itself identifies the officers as shown below. Pat Speer has an extensive discussion - nothing to do with Haygood, mind you - and agrees: https://www.patspeer.com/chapter4bsackoflies/debunking-the-dictabelt. If you're interested, the same photo can be purchased from a different seller with Beverly Oliver's autograph beside Babushka Lady! In fact, I am absolutely astonished that pretty much everyone even remotely connected to the JFKA - and I mean EVERYONE, including people you would never imagine - apparently got into the "autograph biz," and the internet is literally FLOODED with memorabilia, including autographed copies of the "stare of death" autopsy photo!

So at best you've shown evidence that the car had out of state plates. Seems you're hot on the trail, Clouseau.

   You fail to recognize you're being "played" by Columbo. But, that is in character.

   The photo was posted by You. Is there a denial anywhere above regarding your Not knowing WHO took that photo and WHEN? If you are going to post something to challenge my "That Ain't Haygood" position, it would help if you were familiar with what you were posting. So I call you on it, expose your Not Knowing, and you immediately turn into that hideous version of Bilbo Baggins when he can Not get The Ring back. A most ugly thing to see.

Thanks to the Blessed Ignore Feature, this will be our last exchange. The photo in question is all over the internet and has been for decades, primarily in connection with Babushka Lady. You can view it in context here: https://www.jfkassassinationgallery.com/Gallery/Bond%20Gallery. An entirely reputable seller of extensive JFK memorabilia assures me that he obtained numerous such signed photos directly from Clyde Haygood and that Mr. Haygood identified the officer as himself. I have no idea what point you are making, think you are making, or would be making if you were rational. If the two ostensible officers in said photo are in fact Ruth Paine and Clay Shaw dressed for Halloween, it doesn't mean diddly squat to me. The fact - which you choose to ignore - is that there are a number of photos of Clyde Haygood, and he looks exactly like your Nonsensical One Glove No Underwear Bogus Imposter Haygood Bad Guy. With that, I bid you adieu. Well, actually, I bid you Ignore.

   The purpose of a "getaway" car is to getaway. It is intended to Not attract attention and by extension Not attract attention to those riding inside the car. Especially if you believe the shooter(s) was/were "hired out" and had a different colored skin tone(s).
    If that "getaway" car had a Texas Plate, it was either a "57" "59" "61" or a "63" Plate. Texas used White Backgrounds on their plates in those years. Just so you know, if that car is indeed a 1958, Illinois had a very similar White 1958 license plate. (Possible Chicago/Maybe Ruby connection).

                                       This continues to be an extremely active investigation on numerous fronts.

                                       ................................... STAY TUNED ...................................................

So at best you've shown evidence that the car had out of state plates. Seems you're hot on the trail, Clouseau.