Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1


   Sure Mark...As if you didn't have to answer how Ruby waltzed right in to the middle of the Press Conference posing as an assistant to Israeli newspapers...The Dallas cops knew who he was...The Dallas cops knew Oswald was CIA...

Ruby was instrumental to what was probably a failed plan to kill Oswald at the Texas Theater...They had already killed Tippit...A couple of sweating phone calls and offers Ruby couldn't refuse and he was right at the Police Station making sure Oswald maintained character...

Then comes a set-up in the Police Station basement Sunday morning...
2
Completely missed this one……… wow.  Robert Turnbull Crowley? Really, Tom? dang, how one name can stick out, but this is a true zombie thread that has reared its head. It is hard to defend Oswald, if you know the facts.

Gerry Spence, one of the best trial lawyers of his time, who never lost a criminal case as either a prosecutor or defense counsel. was unable to get Oswald acquitted in a mock trial. Of course, he was up against another of the best trial lawyers of his time in Vincent Bugiosi, who only lost one trial during his career as a prosecutor. Count on the CTs telling us how incompetent Spence's defense of Oswald was. It couldn't have been that he was dealt a losing hand.
3
You sound like a teenager trying to lie and insult his way through an argument that he knows he's losing, and losing badly.

Here's a bit of basic logic for you: The fact that a bullet fired from the sixth-floor window could not have hit and transited JFK's neck at an upward angle unless JFK had been leaning far forward, coupled with the fact that we know he was not leaning far forward, proves that the shot could not have come from the sixth-floor window. Thus, the SBT is impossible from the outset, which means that your demand for a non-SBT trajectory through Connally is nothing but a silly evasion.

This is not to mention the fact, again, that WC skeptics have discussed non-SBT trajectories to and through Connally's torso, that Connally himself adamantly rejected any notion that he was hit before Z229, and that Dr. Shaw refuted your ridiculous 45-degree downward angle through Connally.

Objective people will notice that you are ducking and dodging the key facts discussed in my OP and in my replies.

The photos I posted of Arlen Specter demonstrating the single bullet trajectory shows a bullet path on a downward trajectory entering high on JFK's back, exiting at the level of the knot in his tie, and going on to strike JBC. Would you care to address those photos.
4
Completely missed this one……… wow.  Robert Turnbull Crowley? Really, Tom? dang, how one name can stick out, but this is a true zombie thread that has reared its head. It is hard to defend Oswald, if you know the facts.
5
Over the years, I've posed this question to countless CTs on this and other forums and they seem to want to avoid it the way Dracula avoids sunlight. Perhaps if I ask it in its own thread, I might get a CT to respond.

The question is based on a very simple premise. JFK's right hand was still moving downward at Z225 when he first reappears from behind the sign. We know this because we can see his right hand at Z224. It wasn't until frame Z226 that both of JFK's arms start upward in reaction to the bullet that passed through his throat. At that same frame, JBC's right hand which was holding his Stetson suddenly started moving upward. He made a rapid up and down movement of his right arm which lasted for 9 frames or roughly a half second. That was followed immediately by him doubling over and twisting to his right, which is the reaction he remembered making.

My question is simple. If you don't believe JBC's sudden up and down movement of his right arm is in reaction to it being struck by the same bullet that had just passed through JFK's throat, what do you think could have caused that sudden up an down motion of his right arm.
6
Just another load of crap. If you cannot explain the trajectory through Gov Connally and the medical analysis of his wounds in the context of a separate shot, then this is what it appears to be, just another failed crapped out Michael Griffith theory. Before you make a complete fool of yourself maybe read up on what is in involved in the Lattimer, Posner, Meyers theory. A better suggestion would be to go back to your headwound theory. At least it was always good for a laugh.

You sound like a teenager trying to lie and insult his way through an argument that he knows he's losing, and losing badly.

Here's a bit of basic logic for you: The fact that a bullet fired from the sixth-floor window could not have hit and transited JFK's neck at an upward angle unless JFK had been leaning far forward, coupled with the fact that we know he was not leaning far forward, proves that the shot could not have come from the sixth-floor window. Thus, the SBT is impossible from the outset, which means that your demand for a non-SBT trajectory through Connally is nothing but a silly evasion.

This is not to mention the fact, again, that WC skeptics have discussed non-SBT trajectories to and through Connally's torso, that Connally himself adamantly rejected any notion that he was hit before Z229, and that Dr. Shaw refuted your ridiculous 45-degree downward angle through Connally.

Objective people will notice that you are ducking and dodging the key facts discussed in my OP and in my replies.

7

   There are two main reasons why Ruby did this...

   First was to accent the sheep-dipping of patsy Oswald in order to make him look like a true communist/Castro sympathizer...

   Second was to look Oswald in the eye and remind him to maintain character in his his role playing as a crazed communist...And that one of the plotters could get right next to him to remind him...

which plotter was it? there was more than one?  please post your evidence, as well as a video of the press conference, Albert.  You need to zoom debate this, like Scott Kaiser and Hemming’s kid on Rob Clark’s video show.  It was epic, i recommend it highly.
I wonder who you could find to debate, Albert?  how about me?  you could ask me all the questions you’d like about Crump and Mary Pinchot.

8
The photo of Arlen Specter holding a rod with two Secret Service agents sitting in for JFK and JBC shows a shot entering JFK's back 5 1/4 inches below the top of his jacket, exiting at the level of the knot in his tie, and striking JBC where it did was on downward trajectory all the way. The back entrance was NOT below the throat exit.

https://allthatsinteresting.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/arlen-specter-reproducing-the-magic-bullet-trajectory-300x211.jpg

https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-RoucRB2pM-c/TvWYueE8I2I/AAAAAAAABUg/s1jtdpPrX-E/s1600/Specter-02.png

The second image shows the right-to-left diagonal of the bullet, holding the rod above the entry point. He couldn't show both the horizontal and vertical planes of the shot at the same time without skewering the agent.
9
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: The First Shot
« Last post by Andrew Mason on Today at 03:48:53 PM »

To anyone with a grain of intelligence this is really strong evidence that the first shot is after z207 and before z255.
On what basis do you determine that the evidence of Phil Willis (that his z202 photo was just after the first shot) and of Linda Willis (that JFK was between her and the Stemmons sign when the first shot occurred) is wrong?

(and surely you meant before z225 rather than z255).
10
It's amazing the things BD will imagine without the slightest bit of evidence.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10