Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
For the whole year?

https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=55003#relPageId=2

Dear Detective Fweddie,

Look at the "From" line on page 1 of your precious 11 April 1967 document.

Who the heck was B. Frank Young?

Oh yeah, he was the Director or Assistant Director of the Domestic Contact Service at that time.

What's really interesting is that he was in that position in May 1969, as well, as you can see by looking at the below document.

https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/FERRE%2C%20NELS%20F.%20S.%20-%20PROMI%5B16505849%5D.pdf


Your buddy,

-- Tom
2
 
                                            Why not just nicely ask me for the source that shows Euins being loaded into Sawyer's car?
 
 (1) Go to "YOU TUBE".  (2) SEARCH - "Amos Euins?"  by- NoTrueFlags Here  (3) 7:21 -7:30 shows Euins being loaded into Inspector Sawyer's car and the Huge Gates being closed/ajar.

 - BUMP -
3
There's CBS footage of Amos Euins being loaded into Inspector Sawyer's car in front of the TSBD

I have never seen this footage. I don't believe such footage exists.
I believe you are referring to footage of Brennan being loaded into Sawyer's car.
If I am mistaken, please point me towards this footage.

Officer Harkness made a documented 12:36 PM police radio call that he was bringing an eyewitness, (Euins), to the TSBD.

Harkness makes two documented transmissions at 12:36PM

"I have a witness that says that it came from the 5th floor of the Texas Book Depository Store."

"Witness says shots came from fifth floor, Texas Book Depository Store and Houston and Elm. I have him with me now and we are sealing off the building."

Neither of these transmissions states that Harkness was "bringing an eyewitness, (Euins), to the TSBD."


I believe you are wrong about the Euin's footage and the Harkness transmission. To my mind this negates your assertion that Mooney entered the TSBD at 12:38PM.
The Allen picture below shows the gates wide open and the time as 12:40PM.
Mooney had not yet entered the TSBD at 12:40PM



   BUMP
5
TG--

Perhaps we can address this on a new thread.

This thread is supposed to be about Joan Mellen defecating on herself with her book on the USS Liberty.

IMHO, her book on USS Liberty seriously undermines her credibility in general.
6
TG-

I will stand by the CIA historian's description of Clay Shaw, unless you can present evidence to back up your description of Shaw.

"BC,"

Documents proving that Clay Shaw was a highly valued contact source for the CIA are on the Internet.

I'm sure you can find them if you look for them.

Regardless, J. Kenneth did get one thing right in his error-filled, cobbled-together 23-years-after-the-fact report:

Shaw was a highly valued I mean highly paid CIA contact source I mean CIA contract source until 1956, seven years before he allegedly masterminded the homosexual "thrill kill" I mean allegedly organized the evil, evil, evil CIA's assassination of JFK.

-- "TG"
7
TG-

I will stand by the CIA historian's description of Clay Shaw, unless you can present evidence to back up your description of Shaw.

8
Clay Shaw perjured himself in the Garrison trial.

Shaw was asked under oath by his own attorney if he had ever "worked for" the CIA.

Shaw said, "No," which was technically correct since he wasn't paid for what he did.

So, you're mistaken when you say Shaw "perjured himself."

Quote
The CIA historian wrote that Shaw had been a "highly paid" CIA asset.
 

J. Kenneth McDonald wrote in the cobbled-together, 23-years-after-the-fact report that Shaw had been a "highly paid CIA contract source [from 1948] until 1956."

Unless he was misled by probable KGB "mole" Bruce Solie or probable KGB "mole" Leonard V. McCoy, McDonald made two big mistakes -- mistakes which the likes of James DiEugenio, Oliver Stone, and Vladimir Putin absolutely treasure -- he said "highly paid" when he should have said "highly valued," and he said "contract source" when he should have said "contact source."

What the heck is a "contract source," anyway?

LOL!
9
FL-

That was not the way Blunt put it. He described Solie as being "all over" Garrison.

John Newman has posited Solie, a KGB asset, was running LHO.

If true, that might explain Solie's intense interest in what LHO had been doing in N.O.

If not true, Solie might have legitimately been interested in finding out if LHO was a G2 asset.

Gus Russo has said LHO interacted with G2 assets in N.O.

The CIA historian in writing referred to Clay Shaw, who perjured himself in the Garrison trial, as a "highly paid" CIA asset. This is rather explicit.

Shaw was a domestic asset, but of course had international connections and information, and traveled as well.
10
TG-

Nothing. I can't even get in touch with him.

Bummer.

Don't they have a postal service in Thailand?

If so, maybe you can do some "detective work" and figure out where Malcolm J. J. Blunt lives in England and send him a L-E-T-T-E-R.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10