JFK Assassination Forum

I really don't give a shit what you focus on. I just find it silly.
Problems. What problems would that be? Are you denying the shells recovered at the scene could only have been fired by the revolver had in his possession when he tried to shoot the arresting officer?
Are you denying Oswald had the same two makes of bullets that were recovered from Tippit's body? Are you denying Oswald's jacket was found on his escape route? Are you denying Oswald tried to shoot the arresting officer? Are you denying that numerous witnesses IDed Oswald? Just which of the items that I listed do you have problems with?
OK, you go ahead and investigate it and report back to us what you find.

I really don't give a shit what you focus on. I just find it silly.

Of course you do... just like I think you're a fanatical zealot full of BS.

Problems. What problems would that be? Are you denying the shells recovered at the scene could only have been fired by the revolver had in his possession when he tried to shoot the arresting officer?

Let's see if I can mess with your narrow minded brain for a bit! No I don't doubt that the shells recovered were matched to the revolver now in evidence. The problem is that there is no chain of custody for the revolver!

Are you denying Oswald had the same two makes of bullets that were recovered from Tippit's body?

I can't deny or confirm that. What I do know is that Tippit was shot four time by two different bullets and that the shells found at the scene did not match up with the bullets.

Are you denying Oswald's jacket was found on his escape route?

What jacket are you talking about? The jacket found by officers under a car, described as being white, or the gray jacket that Buell Wesley Frazier said Oswald was wearing during the trip to Irving on Thursday afternoon?

Are you denying Oswald tried to shoot the arresting officer?

I wasn't present when it allegedly happened. Neither were you, yet you seem to be willing to jump to conclusions without knowing the actual facts.

Are you denying that numerous witnesses IDed Oswald?

No, that's a fact. I just wonder about the way the line ups were conducted. In my experience it is just about impossible that all the witnesses at a line up identify the same person. There mere fact that none of the witnesses was even reluctant makes the whole line up questionable. This, by far, would be the most interesting part of a trial against Oswald for me. I would have loved to observe these witnesses on the stand being questioned by a defense lawyer.

Just which of the items that I listed do you have problems with?

I have just told you.

OK, you go ahead and investigate it and report back to us what you find.

There is no need to report back to you because you will never ever accept any of it. You are not in a cult for nothing.

AI-version:

Investigative journalist and assassination expert Gus Russo maintains that elements of the Cuban intelligence service (known as the G-2, or DGI) likely encouraged Lee Harvey Oswald to assassinate President Kennedy in retaliation for continuous U.S. plots to overthrow or assassinate Fidel Castro.

Is there a certification process for becoming an assassination expert?

Russo, along with other researchers, argues that Oswald—a fervent Castro supporter—traveled to Mexico City in September 1963 and made contact with Cuban diplomats and intelligence operatives. According to Russo's investigations (detailed in his book Live by the Sword), members of the Cuban regime were made aware of U.S. attempts to assassinate Castro, and they may have in turn accepted or encouraged Oswald’s offer to eliminate Kennedy.[/quote}

I guess the Cubans and Oswalds were just hoping that one day Oswald would have a job at a building overlooking a presidential motorcade route.

Quote

Russo's research builds on declassified documents and interviews with Cuban defectors. For instance, a controversial 2006 documentary co-authored by Russo (Rendezvous with Death) further alleged that Cuban intelligence contracted Oswald to carry out the assassination.

---30---

I have watched the Rendevous With Death documentary, and it is pretty good.

---30---

Due the cadence or sequence of bullet strikes on JBC-JFK, the LNT-SBT JFKA theory does not hold water.

As Trump said to his Energy Secretary yesterday when he started speaking incoherently, "Nobody cares".

Most JFKA researchers, being lefties, then fabricate elaborate tales of a Deep State JFKA.

Some righties, such as James Woolsey, blame Moscow.

Seems to me a low-level plot involving LHO and some G-2'ers, or Alpha 66'ers (who may have been G2 double agents), is more probable.

That's like saying it is more probable that I will win the Mega Millions this week than that I will win the Powerball.

---30---

Remember:

Connally: I was knocked over, just doubled over by the force of the bullet. It went in my back and came out my chest about 2 inches below and the left of my right nipple. The force of the bullet drove my body over almost double and when I looked, immediately I could see I was just drenched with blood. (1 HSCA 42)

Explain to me when this happens, in what frames of the Z-film?

JBC begins to double over and dip to the right at about Z234. It's very obvious.

JC--

The whereabouts of LHO in MC are largely unknown, after his visits to the Russian and Cuban facilities. It is known he met with G-2'ers, who encouraged him to assassinate JFK.

No one knew LHO would have a perch in the TSBD6 at that time.

I have stated many times, LHO and his confederates simply got lucky on the motorcade route, and took advantage of the situation.

LHO did prospect other locations along the parade route.

If, in a counterfactual, the motorcade had chosen a different route, LHO and confederates likely would have altered their plans.

Do you honestly think that these alleged plotters would have counted on luck to get the motorcade route to pass in front of their chosen shooter's workplace? What reason would they have had to hire Oswald before 11/18/1963. Then we are supposed to believe that after getting extremely lucky with the motorcade route, they decided to press their luck again by letting Oswald leave the TSBD and falli into police custody instead of having a car waiting for him outside the TSBD to drive him to his death.

AI-version:

Investigative journalist and assassination expert Gus Russo maintains that elements of the Cuban intelligence service (known as the G-2, or DGI) likely encouraged Lee Harvey Oswald to assassinate President Kennedy in retaliation for continuous U.S. plots to overthrow or assassinate Fidel Castro.

Russo, along with other researchers, argues that Oswald—a fervent Castro supporter—traveled to Mexico City in September 1963 and made contact with Cuban diplomats and intelligence operatives. According to Russo's investigations (detailed in his book Live by the Sword), members of the Cuban regime were made aware of U.S. attempts to assassinate Castro, and they may have in turn accepted or encouraged Oswald’s offer to eliminate Kennedy.

Russo's research builds on declassified documents and interviews with Cuban defectors. For instance, a controversial 2006 documentary co-authored by Russo (Rendezvous with Death) further alleged that Cuban intelligence contracted Oswald to carry out the assassination.

---30---

I have watched the Rendevous With Death documentary, and it is pretty good.


---30---

Due the cadence or sequence of bullet strikes on JBC-JFK, the LNT-SBT JFKA theory does not hold water.

Most JFKA researchers, being lefties, then fabricate elaborate tales of a Deep State JFKA.

Some righties, such as James Woolsey, blame Moscow.

Seems to me a low-level plot involving LHO and some G-2'ers, or Alpha 66'ers (who may have been G2 double agents), is more probable.

---30---

Remember:

Connally: I was knocked over, just doubled over by the force of the bullet. It went in my back and came out my chest about 2 inches below and the left of my right nipple. The force of the bullet drove my body over almost double and when I looked, immediately I could see I was just drenched with blood. (1 HSCA 42)

Explain to me when this happens, in what frames of the Z-film?

This focus on wallets is another fine example of CTs focusing on all the wrong things. The right thing to focus on are these.

1. When arrested, Oswald had in his possession the only revolver in the world which could have fired the shells that the shooter emptied from his revolver as he fled the scene.
2. Oswald had the same two makes of bullets, Remingtons and Winchesters, that were removed from Tippit's body.
3. Oswald's jacket was found on the route the shooter had fled after shooting Tippit.
4. When he was arrested, Oswald tried to shoot the arresting officer.
5. Numerous witnesses IDed Oswald either as the shooter or the man they saw fleeing the scene with a gun in his hand. I don't normally place much faith in UNCORROBORATED witness accounts. These witnesses are corroborated by the fact the person they IDed had the murder weapon in his possession when arrested.

Knowing all this, do we really need to focus on wallets to figure out who shot JDT?