Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
After watching a police officer be murdered in broad daylight right in front of you, would you "simply carry on walking" ???

You are missing the point.

At least a minute or so passed between Tippit passing the 10th and Patton crossing (where Markham stopped walking to let him pass by) and being shot.
Now, why would Markham stay there for at least a minute after Tippit's car had passed, when she needed to get to the bus stop.
2
I think deep down inside you know Oswald is guilty of the Tippit murder but you can't bring yourself to admit it lest your whole internal world come crashing down.

Actually, I couldn't care less if he did or didn't.

If you show me conclusive evidence of his guilt, I'll gladly consider him to be guilty.
But when evidence is misrepresented, ignored and dismissed out of hand, you have to give the suspect the benefit of the doubt.

3
So, the question now becomes, what was Markham doing standing around at the crossing to watch Tippit being killed if she had to catch her bus to work? Wouldn't one expect that she would simply carry on walking in order to get to the bus stop on time?

After watching a police officer be murdered in broad daylight right in front of you, would you "simply carry on walking" ???
4
   With respect to the Alyea photo, you guys have fallen into the trap of solely having your eyes fixed on the "getaway" car. Try widening your attention to the Long Shadows being cast by the people standing close to that "getaway" car. Then, compare that to the Short shadows being cast by people standing around the Island in the Wiegman Film Footage. Tick/Tock involved big time.

More baloney from imaginary anomaly spotter Royell Storing! Boy, I don't envy those flim alterationists who had to painstakingly edit the shadows made by people in cars in Dealey Plaza. Hope they got overtime, or at least a free lunch?
5
Regarding the parallel, nearly horizontal and approximately two-feet-apart lines on the "lower-front part" of your "single car" (which aren't visible on the other part of your "single car"), just look at the frame in Wiegman at the (click-click) "1:47" mark where the tip of the fin on the car in front of Weigman's is touching the right foot of the woman "in white" standing about ten feet to "Fedora Man's" right, will ya?

How could shadows from an oak tree create those straight-and-parallel lines?

Tom, what an awesome request. While reviewing the Hughes film frames I found close up identical shadow patterns in the same area as the “Getaway Car”. This is a DNA scale identification of the Wiegman “Gap” shadow car being in the same location within a few minutes with the Hughes car!!!

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_QAs5E8-X2Sr5Wji-MBHINvR7-o7IrkQ/view?usp=drive_lin

6
Dear Sonderführer Storing,

For how many seconds before the Z-313 shot was Witt continuously captured on film?

How do you know that he didn't misspeak when he said "simultaneously"?

-- Tom

     Have you Not watched/read the Witt HSCA Testimony? And if you want to claim the possibility of Witt "misspeaking", you might as well also diminish the sworn testimony of everyone in every courtroom ever.   
7



Great work as usual James, thank you very much. I am beginning to change my opinion and agree with your assessment and abandon my initial assessment. i can see how a shadow could have fooled me. I am wondering if you can demonstrate the shadow so we can compare it to the Weigman image, and indicate the approximate position of the tree limb that created the shadow. The value of a great 3D model shows itself again. Thanks.

   With respect to the Alyea photo, you guys have fallen into the trap of solely having your eyes fixed on the "getaway" car. Try widening your attention to the Long Shadows being cast by the people standing close to that "getaway" car. Then, compare that to the Short shadows being cast by people standing around the Island in the Wiegman Film Footage. Tick/Tock involved big time.
   And the posted Hughes image of the "getaway" car is a Still Frame. You are restricting your observation(s) to only a single piece of that FILM. Conclusions and Opinions should be based on ALL of the evidence.   
8
Note: Duncan is allowing posting Imgur images as long as I also post a link with a Google Drive for those who can't see the embedded graphics. Thanks Duncan!

The first animated GIF shows a 17.5' 1968 Pontiac Bonneville located on the Elm Extension at about 12:53. Tom Alyea's film taken from the 7th floor, basically 30' above Elsie Dorman's location, shows the front end about 2' west of the lamppost shadow. I'm displaying the views of both Alyea and Wiegman as the position of the car is moved eastward 10' in 1' increments. The car moves about 8' before the taillights are viewable in the Wiegman “Gap”. The initial position is also consistent with the Robert Hughes film of the TSBD doorway taken shortly after the assassination.

A second graphic shows the view from the Wiegman film through the open area “Gap” between the “Fedora Man” and the woman to his right. It was alleged that the 1958 Pontiac Bonneville (Getaway Car) we see in the Wiegman film is not parked on the south side of the extension (nearest to the camera) but is actually a car parked on the north side of the extension-near the Huge Gates. This graphic compares these two scenarios. The north curb car is actually parked just west of the TSBD's west corner. It is partially blocking motorized egress through the gates. I say the car is parked at the south curb nearest the “Fedora Man”. You make the call for yourself.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1swc2Q_86arxdKyaKdMOWme1ZgXqIwnjW/view?usp=drive_link

James

Great work as usual James, thank you very much. I am beginning to change my opinion and agree with your assessment and abandon my initial assessment. i can see how a shadow could have fooled me. I am wondering if you can demonstrate the shadow so we can compare it to the Weigman image, and indicate the approximate position of the tree limb that created the shadow. The value of a great 3D model shows itself again. Thanks.
9
I think deep down inside you know Oswald is guilty of the Tippit murder but you can't bring yourself to admit it lest your whole internal world come crashing down.

Correct.

Oswald murdered Tippit.
10
You may well be correct, because anybody who is truly convinced of Oswald's guilt, doesn't need to misrepresent evidence to make his case, as Bill has done on several occasions in the past.

In podcasts like this it isn't of much significance what Bill says. Far more telling is what he misrepresents, ignores and dismisses.
I think deep down inside you know Oswald is guilty of the Tippit murder but you can't bring yourself to admit it lest your whole internal world come crashing down.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10