Recent Posts
1
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: I almost forgot. Yesterday was a big anniversary for Lee Harvey Oswald.
« Last post by Tom Graves on Yesterday at 11:32:33 PM »I almost forgot that yesterday was the sixty-seventh anniversary of former Marine sharpshooter and U-2 radar operator Lee Harvey Oswald’s arrival in Moscow.
Oswald had gotten out of active duty via a sketchy hardship deferment (his mother had hurt her nose when a box fell on it at work), and he entered the USSR from Helsinki as a tourist, but on 30 October 1959, he walked into the Embassy and told Consul Richard Snyder, Consular Officer John McVickar, and the KGB microphones in the walls that he had applied for Soviet citizenship, that he wanted to renounce his U.S. citizenship, and that he planned on telling the Soviets everything he had learned as a Marine radar operator. (After the JFK assassination, the KGB claimed that it hadn’t realized that Oswald had been stationed at a U-2 base in Japan).
Snyder and McVicker later reported that Oswald seemed amazingly well-prepared for a twenty-year-old high school dropout.
Author John M. Newman believes Bruce Solie (about whom Tennent H. Bagley wrote scathingly in his 2007 book, Spy Wars: Moles, Mysteries, and Deadly Games) in the CIA’s mole-hunting Office of Security was a KGB mole, himself, and that when (probable mole, imho) George Kisevalter sent a cable to CIA headquarters in April 1958 telling it that its spy, GRU Lt. Col. Pyotr Popov, had just told him in West Berlin that the Kremlin had all of the top-secret details of the U-2 spy plane, Solie sent Oswald to Moscow as an ostensible “dangle” in a (unbeknownst to Angleton and Oswald) planned-to-fail hunt for “Popov’s U-2 Mole” (Solie) in the wrong part of the CIA — the Soviet Russia Division.
If true, Kisevalter's and Solie’s doing so caused a mole hunt that not only lasted nine years, tore the Soviet Russia Division apart and drove CIA Counterintelligence chief Angleton nuts, but prevented Solie from being uncovered.
P.S. 16 October 1959 was also, ironically(?), the same day that Popov was publicly arrested in Moscow after having been secretly arrested there in early December 1958. (In other words — contrary to what Cherepanov and Nosenko, et al., said and the zombified CIA now says — Popov wasn’t uncovered due to "superior KGB surveillance and sloppy CIA tradecraft" in early 1959, but was betrayed by a mole significantly earlier than that.)
According to the "intel" on this forum, KGB vs. CIA expert Steve M. Galbraith is posting in this thread.
For like an hour, now.
Question:
Will he decide, as he almost always does, not to post whatever it is he's writing?
A fevered defense of Yuri Nosenko, perhaps?
A refutation of "brainwashed-by-Golitsyn-and-Angleton" Bagley?
Whatcha got, Steve M.?
LOL!
2
General Discussion And Debate (Any Topic) / Re: Am I the only one...
« Last post by Tom Scully on Yesterday at 11:28:06 PM »Hey, Tim, no, not out of bounds. I understand your point, I'm comparing apples and oranges to a possibly unreasonable extrent. OTOH, ChatGPT informs us the average net worth of Boston black households is $8,000 compared to $247,500 for white households.
My point is to show how extreme Richard's POV is.
Total population figures are both genders combined.
Another angle.....females incarcerated in Idaho, 1,470, total population, 2 million. Wallethub safety ranking #19
Males incarcerated in Idaho, 9200, total population, 2 million.
Arkansas population 3,000,000 State and local combined imprisoned 23,850, including 1,650 females, safety ranking #46
females incarcerated in Massachusetts, 700, total population, 7 million. Wallethub states safety ranking #2
Males incarcerated in Massachusetts, 5300, total population, 7 million.
Only Floridas, Arkansas and Georgia actively execute :
Illinois population 12,700,000 Total incarcerated, 30,000 including federal prisoners State Wallethub safety ranking #38
New York population 20,200,000 Total incarcerated, 41,000 does not include federal prisoners safety ranking #20
Florida population 23,400,000 Total incarcerated 143,500 does not include federal prisoners safety ranking #47
Georgia population 10,700,000 Total incarcerated state prisons 50,400, total local state and federal 105,000 safety ranking #41
People are fleeing the liberal hellscapes for red states. All the deflections in the world don't change the obvious conclusion that they are doing so due to the failed leftist policies that have made those places unlivable for law abiding American citizens. The only people who are staying are the homeless, illegal aliens, and criminals.
IOW, the "beatings" (other worldly incarceration rate and counter productive executions) will continue as far as states with Republican controlled state governments are concerned until they run out of money building each ding new prison beds at $300,000, or until the morale improves!
Quote
https://alabamaappleseed.org/news/alabama-department-of-corrections-5-billion-in-spending-in-five-years/
Alabama Department of Corrections: $5 billion in spending in five years
Aug 25, 2025$85 million from the General Fund in FY25 and FY26 for debt service on prison construction bonds issued to build the 4000-bed prison in Elmore County. By way of comparison, each bed in the Governor Kay Ivey megaprison, comes at a cost of $300,000, significantly more than the...
Two states with similar populations but almost nothing in common, other than that,
https://www.prisonpolicy.org/
Massachusetts, Democratic Party controlled state government, Ranked 2nd safest state
Population 7.2 million. No executions, 241 per 100,000 population incarcerated.
Tennessee, Republican Party controlled state government, Ranked 37th safest state
Population 7.3 million. Executions, 817 per 100,000 population incarcerated.
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/release/tables?eid=391444&rid=330
Massachusetts, 48.3% earned at least Bachelor's degree
Tennessee, 32.4% earned at least Bachelor's degree
Disability, percent ages 18 to 64 with a disability, reply to question by ChatGPT,
Massachusetts 9.0 %
Tennessee 15.4 %
https://wallethub.com/edu/safest-states-to-live-in/4566
3
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Anyone can fact check what this Ebay seller is saying?
« Last post by Denis Morissette on Yesterday at 11:26:00 PM »I've just sent a message to the seller asking him for sources.
4
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Anyone can fact check what this Ebay seller is saying?
« Last post by Tom Graves on Yesterday at 11:17:47 PM »5
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Anyone can fact check what this Ebay seller is saying?
« Last post by Denis Morissette on Yesterday at 11:05:28 PM »6
General Discussion And Debate (Any Topic) / Len McCoy's problematic reason for believing Yuri Nosenko was a true defector.
« Last post by Tom Graves on Yesterday at 09:46:09 PM »Putative KGB staff officer Yuri Nosenko, the ostensible deputy chief of the Second Chief Directorate’s British and American Tourists section who had implausibly been chosen to serve as the security officer of a Soviet Arms Negotiation Delegation in Geneva in 1962 and 1964, “walked in” to the CIA there in June 1962, offering to trade two or three bits of KGB intelligence for $250 worth of “desperately needed” Swiss francs. He ended up telling his two case officers, Tennent H. Bagley and probable mole George Kisevalter, lots more than just two secrets during the five meetings they had in a Geneva safe house.
One of the things he told them was that his drinking buddy, KGB officer Yuri Guk, (one of “The Three Musketeers” the FBI saw acting suspiciously so often around D.C. movie houses in early 1957) was able to get him admitted to the KGB’s top-secret Rezidency in Geneva where a garrulous officer inexplicably told him that CIA’s spy, Boris Belitsky, a famous radio personality in Russia, was actually a Kremlin-loyal triple agent.
Probable mole Leonard V. McCoy (R.I.P.) of the CIA’s Soviet Russia Division Reports & Requirements department, tells us in an article on his website, “Ironbark, Inc.” that the reason he decided Nosenko was a true defector was because Kisevalter told him the above story and thereby “confirmed his suspicions” that Belitsky was fake despite his having passed a polygraph exam with flying colors.
Bagley, on the other hand, tells us in his book, Spy Wars, that true defector Anatoly Golitsyn, who had defected to the U.S. six months earlier, knew about Belitsky and that KGB headquarters “knew that he knew.”
To “dot the I” on the last point, Bagley’s friend, former KGB General Sergey Kondrashev, told him a few years after the Cold War that the committee that was set up to determine the extent of damage caused by Golitsyn’s December 1961 defection told him that it definitely knew that Golitsyn had told the CIA about him
In other words, there was a high-level mole in the CIA.
Background:
Golitsyn quickly and furtively (because he wasn’t supposed to have it) read the file on the KGB’s mole in Germany, SASHA, at KGB headquarters around 1951. About all he could remember about SASHA when he defected in December 1961 was that he was based in West Germany, that he was married to a foreigner, and that his name started with a “K” and ended with a “-ski” or “-sky.” Golitsyn mistakenly believed that the KGB agent's codename was SASHA when in fact it was his nickname.
We know that Golitsyn met with the Office of Security’s Bruce Solie four days after he arrived in the U.S. in late December 1961 — when Solie may have tricked him into choosing Serge Klibansky’s name rather than Alexander Kopatzky’s from a list of SASHA suspects — and we also know that Solie was James Angleton’s mole hunting superior and confidant — the last point is evidenced by the fact that Angleton, trying in vain to get Golitsyn to resume working with Solie, told Golitsyn, David E. Murphy, and Raymond Rocca on 29 June 1978 that Solie’s office was the only one that he didn’t fear was penetrated by the KGB.
Ironically, in October 1968 Angleton’s confidant cleared his and Bagley’s bugbear, Nosenko, via a bogus polygraph exam — one of the worst that polygraph expert Richard O. Arther had ever seen in 1978 — and a specious report.
Point being:
If Counterintelligence Chief Angleton was Golitsyn’s primary contact at CIA headquarters soon after he arrived from Helsinki (as is very probable), Golitsyn probably told him about Belitsky and Kondrashev. Angleton may have shared that intel with his trusted Philby-like confidant, Solie, and Solie, in turn, probably shared it with KGB headquarters.
P.S. The birthname of Peter Karlow (who was already suspected in the Easy Chair case) was Serge Klibansky, and one of Igor Orlov’s many former names was Alexander "Sasha" Kopatsky.
P.P.S. Angleton described Orlov/Kopatzky as a long-running master Soviet spy in his 1978 HSCA testimony.
One of the things he told them was that his drinking buddy, KGB officer Yuri Guk, (one of “The Three Musketeers” the FBI saw acting suspiciously so often around D.C. movie houses in early 1957) was able to get him admitted to the KGB’s top-secret Rezidency in Geneva where a garrulous officer inexplicably told him that CIA’s spy, Boris Belitsky, a famous radio personality in Russia, was actually a Kremlin-loyal triple agent.
Probable mole Leonard V. McCoy (R.I.P.) of the CIA’s Soviet Russia Division Reports & Requirements department, tells us in an article on his website, “Ironbark, Inc.” that the reason he decided Nosenko was a true defector was because Kisevalter told him the above story and thereby “confirmed his suspicions” that Belitsky was fake despite his having passed a polygraph exam with flying colors.
Bagley, on the other hand, tells us in his book, Spy Wars, that true defector Anatoly Golitsyn, who had defected to the U.S. six months earlier, knew about Belitsky and that KGB headquarters “knew that he knew.”
To “dot the I” on the last point, Bagley’s friend, former KGB General Sergey Kondrashev, told him a few years after the Cold War that the committee that was set up to determine the extent of damage caused by Golitsyn’s December 1961 defection told him that it definitely knew that Golitsyn had told the CIA about him
In other words, there was a high-level mole in the CIA.
Background:
Golitsyn quickly and furtively (because he wasn’t supposed to have it) read the file on the KGB’s mole in Germany, SASHA, at KGB headquarters around 1951. About all he could remember about SASHA when he defected in December 1961 was that he was based in West Germany, that he was married to a foreigner, and that his name started with a “K” and ended with a “-ski” or “-sky.” Golitsyn mistakenly believed that the KGB agent's codename was SASHA when in fact it was his nickname.
We know that Golitsyn met with the Office of Security’s Bruce Solie four days after he arrived in the U.S. in late December 1961 — when Solie may have tricked him into choosing Serge Klibansky’s name rather than Alexander Kopatzky’s from a list of SASHA suspects — and we also know that Solie was James Angleton’s mole hunting superior and confidant — the last point is evidenced by the fact that Angleton, trying in vain to get Golitsyn to resume working with Solie, told Golitsyn, David E. Murphy, and Raymond Rocca on 29 June 1978 that Solie’s office was the only one that he didn’t fear was penetrated by the KGB.
Ironically, in October 1968 Angleton’s confidant cleared his and Bagley’s bugbear, Nosenko, via a bogus polygraph exam — one of the worst that polygraph expert Richard O. Arther had ever seen in 1978 — and a specious report.
Point being:
If Counterintelligence Chief Angleton was Golitsyn’s primary contact at CIA headquarters soon after he arrived from Helsinki (as is very probable), Golitsyn probably told him about Belitsky and Kondrashev. Angleton may have shared that intel with his trusted Philby-like confidant, Solie, and Solie, in turn, probably shared it with KGB headquarters.
P.S. The birthname of Peter Karlow (who was already suspected in the Easy Chair case) was Serge Klibansky, and one of Igor Orlov’s many former names was Alexander "Sasha" Kopatsky.
P.P.S. Angleton described Orlov/Kopatzky as a long-running master Soviet spy in his 1978 HSCA testimony.
7
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Brian Doyle: Audio Interview With Witness Sarah Stanton's Granddaughter
« Last post by John Corbett on Yesterday at 09:38:25 PM »Corbett is just an internet nay-sayer...
Wanda Daniel is the grand daughter of a now serious new witness...
I am a naysayer of horsexxxx which is pretty much all you ever post.
8
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / I almost forgot. Yesterday was a big anniversary for Lee Harvey Oswald.
« Last post by Tom Graves on Yesterday at 08:13:19 PM »I almost forgot that yesterday was the sixty-seventh anniversary of former Marine sharpshooter and U-2 radar operator Lee Harvey Oswald’s arrival in Moscow.
Oswald had gotten out of active duty via a sketchy hardship deferment (his mother had hurt her nose when a box fell on it at work), and he entered the USSR from Helsinki as a tourist, but on 30 October 1959, he walked into the Embassy and told Consul Richard Snyder, Consular Officer John McVickar, and the KGB microphones in the walls that he had applied for Soviet citizenship, that he wanted to renounce his U.S. citizenship, and that he planned on telling the Soviets everything he had learned as a Marine radar operator. (After the JFK assassination, the KGB claimed that it hadn’t realized that Oswald had been stationed at a U-2 base in Japan).
Snyder and McVicker later reported that Oswald seemed amazingly well-prepared for a twenty-year-old high school dropout.
Author John M. Newman believes Bruce Solie (about whom Tennent H. Bagley wrote scathingly in his 2007 book, Spy Wars: Moles, Mysteries, and Deadly Games) in the CIA’s mole-hunting Office of Security was a KGB mole, himself, and that when (probable mole, imho) George Kisevalter sent a cable to CIA headquarters in April 1958 telling it that its spy, GRU Lt. Col. Pyotr Popov, had just told him in West Berlin that the Kremlin had all of the top-secret details of the U-2 spy plane, Solie sent Oswald to Moscow as an ostensible “dangle” in a (unbeknownst to Angleton and Oswald) planned-to-fail hunt for “Popov’s U-2 Mole” (Solie) in the wrong part of the CIA — the Soviet Russia Division.
If true, Kisevalter's and Solie’s doing so caused a mole hunt that not only lasted nine years, tore the Soviet Russia Division apart and drove CIA Counterintelligence chief Angleton nuts, but prevented Solie from being uncovered.
P.S. 16 October 1959 was also, ironically(?), the same day that Popov was publicly arrested in Moscow after having been secretly arrested there in early December 1958. (In other words — contrary to what Cherepanov and Nosenko, et al., said and the zombified CIA now says — Popov wasn’t uncovered due to "superior KGB surveillance and sloppy CIA tradecraft" in early 1959, but was betrayed by a mole significantly earlier than that.)
Oswald had gotten out of active duty via a sketchy hardship deferment (his mother had hurt her nose when a box fell on it at work), and he entered the USSR from Helsinki as a tourist, but on 30 October 1959, he walked into the Embassy and told Consul Richard Snyder, Consular Officer John McVickar, and the KGB microphones in the walls that he had applied for Soviet citizenship, that he wanted to renounce his U.S. citizenship, and that he planned on telling the Soviets everything he had learned as a Marine radar operator. (After the JFK assassination, the KGB claimed that it hadn’t realized that Oswald had been stationed at a U-2 base in Japan).
Snyder and McVicker later reported that Oswald seemed amazingly well-prepared for a twenty-year-old high school dropout.
Author John M. Newman believes Bruce Solie (about whom Tennent H. Bagley wrote scathingly in his 2007 book, Spy Wars: Moles, Mysteries, and Deadly Games) in the CIA’s mole-hunting Office of Security was a KGB mole, himself, and that when (probable mole, imho) George Kisevalter sent a cable to CIA headquarters in April 1958 telling it that its spy, GRU Lt. Col. Pyotr Popov, had just told him in West Berlin that the Kremlin had all of the top-secret details of the U-2 spy plane, Solie sent Oswald to Moscow as an ostensible “dangle” in a (unbeknownst to Angleton and Oswald) planned-to-fail hunt for “Popov’s U-2 Mole” (Solie) in the wrong part of the CIA — the Soviet Russia Division.
If true, Kisevalter's and Solie’s doing so caused a mole hunt that not only lasted nine years, tore the Soviet Russia Division apart and drove CIA Counterintelligence chief Angleton nuts, but prevented Solie from being uncovered.
P.S. 16 October 1959 was also, ironically(?), the same day that Popov was publicly arrested in Moscow after having been secretly arrested there in early December 1958. (In other words — contrary to what Cherepanov and Nosenko, et al., said and the zombified CIA now says — Popov wasn’t uncovered due to "superior KGB surveillance and sloppy CIA tradecraft" in early 1959, but was betrayed by a mole significantly earlier than that.)
9
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: The Miracle On Elm Street
« Last post by Jack Nessan on Yesterday at 04:31:04 PM »I'm going to crack on with this supposed debate with Jack and assume he's going to join in at some point.
Firstly I'm going to assume that Jack does, indeed, believe that Arnold Rowland invented the man on the 6th floor. I've asked him for a Yes/No on this issue at least six times and he has been typically evasive about this most basic question. I don't know why and I'm not sure I care but let's assume his evasiveness is to hide the fact he believes something so fundamentally ridiculous as the Miracle on Elm Street.
Secondly, I'm going to choose the most coherent thing I can find that he has posted on this subject which, with Jack, is no easy task. I'm going to pick what I believe is a valid point that needs explanation. Unfortunately most of Jack's 'evidence' is just his wobbly opinion of things but here goes.
This is from REPLY#2021, "The First Shot" thread.
Jack doesn't seem to believe that Rowland could have seen the man with the rifle through the open set of windows in the way he describes in his testimony (I think):
The window is 29 inches tall and it starts 14 inches off the floor. He doesn’t know that because they finally ask him if he had ever been inside the TSBD. No
But his description of the person in no way reflects the correct window dimensions.
Mr. SPECTER - And how much, if any, of his body was obscured by the window frame from that point down to the floor?
Mr. ROWLAND - From where I was standing I could see from his head to about 6 inches below his waist, below his belt.
Mr. SPECTER - Could you see as far as his knees?
Mr. ROWLAND - No.
Mr. SPECTER - And what is your best recollection as to how close to the window he was standing?
Mr. ROWLAND - He wasn't next to the window, but he wasn't very far back. I would say 3 to 5 feet back from the window.
Mr. SPECTER - How much of the rifle was separated from your line of vision by the window?
Mr. ROWLAND - The entire rifle was in my view.
But he is not done yet. He is unstoppable with his description of what is impossible to see through a 29 inch window. Specter realizes he is making it all up as he talks.
Mr. SPECTER - And how much of his body, if any, was in the open view where there was no window between your eyes and the object of his body?
Mr. ROWLAND - Approximately two-thirds of his body just below his waist.
Mr. SPECTER - Up to what point?
Mr. ROWLAND - Mid point between the waist and the knees, this is again in my proportion to his height that I make that judgment.
Mr. SPECTER - So from the waist, some point between his knees and his waist, you started to see hi clear in the window?
Mr. ROWLAND - Yes.
Mr. SPECTER - And from that point how far up his body were you able to see without any obstruction of a window between you and him?
Mr. ROWLAND - To the top of his head. There was some space on top of that where I could see the wall behind him.
Mr. SPECTER - What is your best estimate of the space between the top of his head and the open window at the perspective you were observing?
Mr. ROWLAND - Two and a half, three feet, something on that--that is something very hard to ascertain. That would just be an estimation on my part.
Clearly Jack does not believe Rowland could see as much of the man with the rifle as he said he could, because the gap of 29 inches was not big enough. He describes it as "impossible". I hope this is a fair summary of Jack's position and I'm sure he'll correct me if it's not.
As far as I'm concerned, the only way to accurately test this claim is through computer graphics. It would require an accurate model of Dealey Plaza and the TSBD building, with the ability to have a POV from Rowland's known position.
And this is exactly what Charles Collins did in "The Floor-Laying Crew" thread (Reply#138)
Okay, here's what ~4.5' looks like in my 3D model. BRW sitting on the cart is the camera position and is represented by the virtual visitor icon. I don't think it is quite that far, but giving you the benefit of the doubt, the stack of boxes is approximately 4.5' from the inside of the south wall. I have made one box invisible so that part of the rifleman character can be seen behind the boxes from BRW's position. The rifleman character is about 5' from the inside of the south wall, within the revised range that Rowland estimated.
Here is the view from Arnold Rowland's position. It fits reasonably well with his description.
Charles was actually trying to ascertain what BRW would have seen from his stated position on the trolley at the end of the third aisle while having his lunch. He established that boxes down by the east end of the 6th floor would have obscured the man with the rifle from the view of anyone sat on the trolley, if the man was stood about 5 feet from the southwest window.
He also showed what someone stood at Arnold Rowland's position would have seen through the fully open southwest window.
IT IS A PERFECT MATCH FOR WHAT ARNOLD ROWLAND DESCRIBED.
Could there be clearer confirmation of the accuracy of Rowland's testimony on this matter?
IT IS A PERFECT MATCH FOR WHAT ARNOLD ROWLAND DESCRIBED.
Could there be clearer confirmation of the accuracy of Rowland's testimony on this matter?
First No to the match
Second,
It is not confirmation at all. He got the program wrong and additionally failed to apply all of Rowland's description.
------------------
Maybe this subject is too complex and lengthy for you to understand.
There was never any doubt this misguided program of Charles is where you were headed with this whole thread the whole time and here you are with it.
You do not need a computer program to understand what Specter understood just standing in front of Rowland and asking him questions. Simple math skills would work. I would think you would want to shy away from any subject where Specter is involved because it is obvious how much smarter he is than you. When you see his name, you should just move onto your next bizarre theory.
Charles was told his computer program was wrong when he did it the first time. Now here you with it and you are stumbling around with your usual lack of knowledge.
Where is your analysis? You posted Arnold’s replies to Mr. Specter. You can’t read? You cannot explain how it fits the window frame? It appears you are hiding in the weeds while you are throwing Charles under the bus.
--------------------
Maybe we should establish how big a goof you really are. Here is an example of your research and opinion.
Here is the culmination of one of your other debates on the thread called “Palmprint.” You were making a misinformed point about the palmprint on the wrong carcano rifle.
Dan O’Meara
"Here's another little mystery i came across while going through Day's WC testimony.
Maybe you could help me out with it Jack, you're unique outlook might come in useful.
Day is testifying about when he first discovered the magical palmprint:"
"I could also see a trace of a print on the side of the barrel that extended under the woodstock. I started to take the woodstock off and noted traces of a palmprint near the firing end of the barrel about 3 inches under the wood-stock when I took the woodstock loose...On the bottom side of the barrel which was covered by the wood, I found traces of a palmprint. I dusted these and tried lifting them, the prints, with scotch tape in the usual manner. A faint palmprint came off."
Now, my interpretation of this is that Day saw traces of the palmprint sticking out from under the wooden stock. When he takes the wood off he sees the palmprint on the underside of the barrel. In the pic below I've put a red arrow to point out where Day is referring to when he says the print "extended under the woodstock" and was on "the bottom side of the barrel".
What do you reckon Jack?
Is this a fair interpretation of what Day testified to?
J Nessan: “You have posted the wrong Carcano rifle. That looks like the M91 TS and has a shorter barrel. You want the 91/38 rifle. I would think the WC located it exactly where it was found on the barrel. Can you make your point anyway with the wrong rifle?”
This was the end of the thread as you tucked tail and ran for the hills.
--------------
The Styles-- Adams story is just as bizarre. No concept at all those other people were there. Once again then you tucked tail and ran.
-----------------
Now here you are again with an opinion that is equally as lame, on a subject you have demonstrated you have no skill in interpreting what was asked by Specter or stated by Rowland.
It is apparent what is wrong with Charles's computer program. With even just a little math and the basic knowledge of the 6th floor, I thought even the stupidest of people could see it, but apparently you want to prove I was wrong about the lengths stupid people will go.
I will not break it down for you. Either figure it out for yourself or remain ignorant, or both.
10
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Brian Doyle: Audio Interview With Witness Sarah Stanton's Granddaughter
« Last post by Brian Doyle on Yesterday at 03:22:13 PM »Corbett is just an internet nay-sayer...
Wanda Daniel is the grand daughter of a now serious new witness...