Such thinking causes us to miss some of the best, most subtle evidence...

I am the researcher who discovered that Lovelady told Jarman that he saw Oswald exit the front door and leave...Lovelady did that around the HSCA because he was conscious of the fact his partner Shelley was CIA...Lovelady did that in order to cover for CIA Shelley because Shelley had assisted Oswald around the police cordon and being stopped by a cop at the front door and told to step aside...This event was the most dangerous and threatening thing to the conspiracy because it showed a conscious setting up of Oswald in the Depository and knowledge by the actors of the conspiracy...It showed motives and who everyone was in the Depository...Shelley escorting Oswald out the Loading Dock and not telling about it are two of the main things that orient the conspiracy in the Depository...They were the main focus of the cover-up...

If you have a good sense of things and detective skills like myself you'll notice that HSCA did not pounce on Jarman's admission and take Lovelady to task on why he never told this important witnessing at any of the previous inquiries by the authorities...Why he didn't tell this to the FBI or Warren Commission...The reason why HSCA had an unaccountable lack of follow-through on Jarman's admission is because they knew it was a lie and knew Lovelady was covering for Shelley and his guiding of Oswald around the police restriction at the front door...Once again, this one little claim threatened to expose the whole conspiracy and threatened to cause an inquiry in to the happenings in the Lobby that the government did not want to discuss or have any skilled investigators like myself make them answer any questions over...This non-pursuit allowed the false premise that Oswald exited through the front door have its intended effect while avoiding the necessary follow-through it required versus the rest of the evidence...To make such a crude protest about Lovelady is to miss some of the most explosive important evidence that cracks the case...It is like passing up world class exotic art pieces in order to shop the WalMart shelf...

That's the problem. You people assume there was a conspiracy and unable to find evidence of such, you go on all these snipe hunts in hopes of finding such evidence. If you would just take a straight forward look at the evidence and follow it to a logical conclusion, you would realize the reason there is no evidence of a conspiracy is because there was no conspiracy. But that's not the answer you people want so you go off on all these tangents that lead nowhere. 62 years of futility hasn't dissuaded you folks from your ill-conceived beliefs.

 

Rosemary Wills does one head turn toward the TSBD. Here it is:

Point being?

This fellow was a self-reported Stanford friend by Talbot Bielefeldt. Are you familiar with his name? It remained redacted until 2018 or 2022.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_L._Jenkins

WA Hyde invited Bielefeldt, Dr. Jenkins, and Sylvia and her husband to spend the evening with him.
https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=223891#relPageId=1&search=Bielefeldt

Do you find that suspicious that Bielefeldt notified probable KGB mole Bruce Solie that he, Hyde, and Jenkins, who had been friends at Stanford, got together for dinner in 1955?

Dear Tom "A Beautiful Mind" Skully,

Do you find it interesting that in April of 1964, probable KGB "mole" Bruce Solie (father-figure-requiring James Angleton's confidant, mentor, and mole-hunting superior) tried to talk W. David Slawson into letting Yuri "The KGB Had Nothing To Do With Oswald In The USSR" Nosenko testify to the Warren Commission even though CIA Counterintelligence and the Soviet Russia Division were convinced he'd been a false-defector-in-place in Geneva in June 1962, sent to the CIA there to protect a mole or two or three from being uncovered by recent true defector Anatoly Golitsyn's revelations?

Do you find it interesting that KGB Major Aleksey Kulak (J. Edgar Hoover's shielded-from-CIA FEDORA at the FBI's NYC field office) had to lamely retract his two specific "confirmations" of Nosenko's bonafide-ness when Nosenko admitted during interrogations to having lied about those two things (i.e., his now being a "Lieutenant Colonel" and his having received a "return to Moscow immediately" telegram in Geneva in February 1964)?

Do you find it interesting that Solie "cleared" Nosenko in October 1968 via a bogus polygraph exam and a specious report?

Do you find it interesting that Solie hid CIA documents from the Church Committee and the HSCA?

-- Tom

Yes, to all of the above.

This fellow's name was a self-reported Stanford friend by Talbot B.
Are you  famiioar with his name, it remained redacted until 2018 or 2022.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_L._Jenkins

https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=223891#relPageId=1&search=Bielefeldt
WA Hyde invited Bielefeldt, Dr. Jenkins, and Sylvia and her husband to spend the evening with him.