Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
I wonder, Jake, if you fully understand the damage you do.

 ::) Oh, the irony.  ::)
2
I wonder, Jake, if you fully understand the damage you do.
3
Nutters like Lance are non-conspiracy theorists [NCTs]
Like all true Nutters, he believes that Oswald shooting JFK is a FACT.
IT IS NOT.
It is just another theory.
He cannot accept this even though he pretends that he does.
Lance belongs to the Lunatic Fringe of Nutters. Tinfoil Nutters. Just like John Corbett and "Richard Smith"
Then there are LNers like Charles Collins and John Mytton.
Honest researchers who have worked their way to their own conclusions.
Not like the spoon-fed losers who have recently emerged on this forum.

Wipe that spittle off your screen and try reading some of my posts. I am not a "Tinfoil Nutter" by a long shot.

As I have educated you previously, your use of the phrase "just a theory" is badly misinformed. Like it or not, at this point the LN narrative is the only scenario that qualifies as a theory. At this point, there is no other narrative that has advanced beyond the stage of raw speculation - not even a hypothesis. There is no other "theory" apart from the internally coherent, evidence-based and repeatedly confirmed LN narrative. Breaking news: "I think I can play defense counsel and raise reasonable doubt about 17 aspects of the LN narrative" is not a theory.

The fact is, you are MTG Jr. - well-informed, I'm sure, and reasonably intelligent, I'm sure - but Exhibit A Jr. for what the lunatic fringe looks like. That is why you, like MTG, live on a steady diet of ad hominem attacks and straw man arguments. At some level, you know you aren't thinking clearly or making any sense, so all you can do is attack the messengers who point this out.
4

Was there any investigation of this person sitting behind the bridge whom Cancellare caught on camera seconds after the assassination?



5
Instead of engaging in debate....

I only presented what author Carpenter claimed he found in the Clay Shaw archive because I was attempting to verify that my discovery, was uninfluenced by Carpenter in any way,

My inquiry began when I noticed in the Garrison Files that atorney Monte Lemann had been approached by someone in CIA leadership to sign off on
the hiring of William P. Burke as the first head of the new NOLA CIA Domestic Contacts office.

Lemann's son, Stephen, was accused by Garrison of being the CIA paymaster in New Orleans. Mary Ferrell's file card on Stphen B Lemann described him
as head of the NOLA CIA Domestic Contacts office.

Monte Lemann's other son, Thomas Lemann, happened to be the father of Niccholas Lemann.
.
In 1947 recently widowed Burke had married Mildred Crumb Lyons.

Monte's new bride in 1947 had the same name as her daughter, Mildred Lyons.
So, Monte's second wife, Mildred, was the mother of Mildred Lyons Baldwin, mother-in-law of David Baldwin, stepmother of
Stephen and Thomas Lemann, and the step-grandmother of Thomas's son, Nicholas Lemann.







Hiya Tom, I've seen you post so much over recent years but don't have the first clue what you actually think about the assassination.
What do you think and why do you think it?
6
What new evidence? The arguments being made today are the same ones I saw 35 years ago when I first started discussing the JFKA online. I occasionally see new arguments made, but no new evidence. Just a whole lot of nothing burgers.

Instead of engaging in debate....

Quote
https://www.deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/showthread.php?tid=15982&pid=125273#pid125273
01-09-2019, 09:51 PM
Jim DiEugenio Wrote:
Tom, I like you personally and I think you usually do good work and I defended you when people were attacking your approach at EF

But I am at a loss to explain how you fell for Carpenter. This is a guy who writes for Max Holland....

I only presented what author Carpenter claimed he found in the Clay Shaw archive because I was attempting to verify that my discovery, uninfluenced by Carpenter in any way, was actually original research. 

My inquiry began when I noticed in the Garrison Files that attorney Monte Lemann had been approached by someone in CIA leadership to sign off on
the hiring of William P. Burke as the first head of the new NOLA CIA Domestic Contacts office.

Lemann's son, Stephen, was accused by Garrison of being the CIA paymaster in New Orleans. Mary Ferrell's file card on Stphen B Lemann described him
as head of the NOLA CIA Domestic Contacts office.

Monte Lemann's other son, Thomas Lemann, happened to be the father of Nicholas Lemann.
.
In 1947 recently widowed Monte Lemann had married Mildred Crumb Lyons.

Monte's new bride in 1947 had the same name as her daughter, Mildred Lyons.
So, Monte's second wife, Mildred, was the mother of Mildred Lyons Baldwin, mother-in-law of David Baldwin, stepmother of
Stephen and Thomas Lemann, and the step-grandmother of Thomas's son, Nicholas Lemann.







-snip-
PLEASE BEAR IN MIND THAT THE FACTS I'VE PRESENTED IN THIS THREAD SUPPORT TOM PURVIS'S OPINION GARRISON, TOM BETHELL, HIS FRIEND NICHOLAS LEMANN, HIS UNCLE, STEPHEN B. LEMANN, AND "THE CIA PEOPLE" AUTHOR JOAN MELLEN DESCRIBED TO REX BRADFORD IN A 2006 INTERVIEW, WERE ALL ON THE SAME SIDE, the smokescreen side.
-snip-

Quote
https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/Unredacted_-_Episode_1_-_Transcript.html
Episode_1_-_Transcript.html
Unredacted Episode 1: Transcript of Interview with Joan Mellen Joan Mellen is the author of A Farewell to Justice: Jim Garrison, JFK's Assassination, and the Case That Should Have Changed History. This interview was conducted on 22 Feb 2006.
.......JOAN: when Baldwin was present, he was a CIA asset, his brother worked for the International Trade Mart and Clay Shaw, David Baldwin, and these, these are CIA people. Malcolm O'Hara is sitting there he doesn't know what hit him and eventually Strate did not cooperate, and he went up there, and he attacked Sheridan of course, Sheridan had immunity nothing anyone could say about Sheridan whether in court, affidavits signed against Sheridan, Sheridan had immunity as a National Security Agency asset, cleared for FBI work, cleared for CIA work, working for the Department of Justice -…....
7
IS IT PLAUSIBLE OSWALD COULD HAVE COMPLETELY MISSED THE LIMO WITH HIS FIRST SHOT?

NO
8
LOL.  You start a silly topic on ghosts by writing a book and then insult the only two posters who respond.  Your posts are so long you should write a book on the topic.  You must really enjoy hearing yourself talk.  I won't make the mistake again.

1. 584 words is a "book" in your world? Alas, I suspect it is.
2. "Ghosts" is in the title of the forum Duncan started. If it's a "silly topic," perhaps take that up with Duncan.
3. You responded with two dismissive posts, the substance of which was addressed in my first post - which you clearly didn't read.
4. Across the board, you appear to have the intellectual curiosity of a fence post. You know it all without really knowing anything.
9
And then there are zombified-by-KGB-disinfo CTs like you, danny BOY o'meara.

Why are you constantly blowing the KGB's c£ck?
If it wasn't for you no-one on this forum would have any thought about Russia or the KGB or anything like that.
Your endless promotion of Russia is recorded on this thread.
You are such a Pinko loser it defies belief.
You used to mean something.
What happened to you?
10
The JFK Assassination - Discussion & Debate / Re: The First Shot
« Last post by Dan O'meara on Yesterday at 11:33:00 PM »
Good point, danny BOY o'meara!

Some of them had started consciously reacting to THAT one as early as Z-145 or so (as had Rosemary Ellis and most of the passengers in the limo).

Made up sh£t backed up by nothing.
Similar to every post you've made on this forum.
The agents reported reacting immediately to the sound of a shot.
Aren't you embarrassed by what a loser you have become regarding JFKA research?
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10