Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Mark Lane and Charles Brehm
« Last post by Fred Litwin on Today at 02:10:01 PM »
I guess you didn't read my post. You should.

Lane DID ask Brehm where the shots came from and Brehm answered him. Lane cut that answer out from the film. We know
this because the uncut film interviews were retrieved from the De Antonio papers in Wisconsin.

fred
2
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: S. M. Holland's "Smoke" on the Grassy Knoll
« Last post by Marjan Rynkiewicz on Today at 01:46:41 PM »
Quote from: Royell Storing on Today at 01:13:54 PM
    There is ZERO Evidence than a shot hit the "overhead signal arm". You got Holland blowing off about this, and the Sixth Floor Museum giving him the platform to do it, but in FACT, there is literally nothing. Some guy ran into that traffic signal and knocked it down. Gary Mack called Holland about it being down and they went through that thing with a fine tooth comb. Found NOTHING.
    With respect to a possible SA Hickey AR-15 firing spree, I do believe there is evidence of this having happened. I can Not say this "spree" struck JFK, but I do believe there is evidence that those shots did cause damage inside Dealey Plaza. I believe Hickey's AR-15 firing burst went in the general direction of Gordon Arnold. If you are interested let me know. I'll direct you to what I believe is Image Evidence of the damage caused inside Dealey Plaza.
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2833.192.html
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2833.168.html

https://i.postimg.cc/TPM9r7vX/Hickey-6-shot-burst.jpg




https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/ZTraAfTO2JHfKSBQJC-M56QhbAsGc3-CMDUgTeANoK8agQZTvVt6TpuBMiqVGhoq_SMfIHtHvhfoKrr4QIwq-EpDBpey0QvMcCdawe1KKhRh73y6U3M4vg2MB0evlL9-_MuLAbDZOaPBHd5fbD4N7GUhcIY16bH2vfbqAv99vQ_-nAdYA8I7HVmw8-qQ4oUQ-f51jBeKCSB3lOi91_O4pB5p0afQgFEBIwHxcVBVZkZUQYr9xvelG-mGMzSPL2QWCPa7cy5k3geQBBYitN1Nwfs7XWSZcH0MQN-axhuokhVxWELLbhQ61ZBFSG7bS86mckMpNFFtwcqQ84tmf1PUsOcEFTTa0-uKbuFzQUnyyQ93cGS_NP5_xEAMelsuvj7SRGCCUFxOkSFe1k5XCyNK8jJaztyLcNKs_2T-Sl1czAxXZ89bttNR8-itOcO9qoQ501ahD3yG-K-UlNeaLl8QhD-a3aJiaTqnN5NwVc4KZ-cshscvt3ZWjpJiZKvGR8BWy1-LRu5dbA7nm4W5_9sXzzWQkxE_PbnwzklomEm035OkYbGHuWP-xHBTTRSUEHkLkBoA5zTE9RziNbyJqWn8WW5ZYbjRogTr2daW_TAi_uW-nseYaS06D0MseUkzqUW5-tMBcjgbh645kBa1bnyaLnTOp5kAqr_eHx2mNEjis6p7F7rH1_mNrJvQlRqtPdax6suYMPTyoH7JKgdpZeGKzVl7=w682-h372-no?authuser=0

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/2GpXdoUZ1ScB4NxbFNknmc2JQZjA6CxOGfC30x--4nznz_M1SYgSKjXVS8rEPrDADgDTnReyHMalPFBPVs5TcjibZOtHTc5MQUDZS9gIp9YZYDOjl7j8KgYESbtcl247iZIBJx1G_JVINPmN-oRKxiE3umGIEQpsDFrA8o5yW9UVxMiX9pLStBUd_oAELu8-UIt9CRfuQXyT4Nqd7oDYRVswhL-dKhW9dQo0f9UFIIhUCUSW20nkd2dW5mGXeSKgA3coloVvIXNkCUpXaUaYKI3kqw2XHrG7FLlfbkOqic-L9IxkcHzLV2RFjhZ2tOTnieRyhHANr_NK3cb38AZlM8dIbD5htbMxx98n5W41z9eAL2hnJdRhX-Tk_th8zY-KqT-wZ4UC4zhGnjDwQwOZKMESAYdAmZPbyiD-qEbjYuWR88QGNGiNB1uVzg0u_vN0r2Om-GtW2MLZkhTa44DJTMUJOWtqAZkRzUMmmxbtWRSlusv2uAwstHRgn-Qk6omHLnkrjSLMhuyy-CZMEKCextAkVcsBYEyGnfq4N7Q41BW-SeL9Gohf3NYfxuwJ1In0dDSpTmiDJt3s5XzKBmk11vGDzS-MdDbsKT_exSSmq9T9Y-tmv1mMhCghNBFk54LFmdbYcU64w0PyecBbB_6iSBoLyi0CtGP0I_bvE_bKsPxuWfmAjRTs_HS_n5Rw=w422-h372-no?authuser=0
3
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: That Is Not Officer Haygood = Conspiracy! Prove Me Wrong Challenge
« Last post by Royell Storing on Today at 01:43:49 PM »
Quote from: Tom Graves on Today at 01:16:46 AM
Dear Peon I mean Zeon,

Is English your second language?

-- Tom

  Referring to someone as a "Peon" is uncalled for. There are people posting here from all around the world. 
4
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: A Car, A Garden, And A Coupla Guys
« Last post by Royell Storing on Today at 01:38:14 PM »
Quote from: James Hackerott on October 18, 2025, 10:21:32 PM
Sorry. These graphics might help. The graphic of the tree is an anaglyph, 3D if you can find a pair of the Red/Cyan glasses. Cheap on Amazon  :)



     If you do see a pair of those Red/Cyan glasses that are required to see, "Shadow DNA", you need to immediately snap them up. Ralph Cinque consistently buys them by the bushel basket. 
5
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Mark Lane and Charles Brehm
« Last post by Marjan Rynkiewicz on Today at 01:33:31 PM »
Quote from: Fred Litwin on Today at 11:49:27 AM
You are missing my point. It is about Lane's intellectual dishonesty. He asked Brehm in the interview where the shots came from, and Brehm answered him. Lane
did not include the answer in his film. But he did infer from Brehm's other statements where the shots came from.

On the other hand, I don't believe the Dallas Times Herald, because Jay Skaggs took a few photographs of Brehm on November 22nd and in his oral history project, says that Brehm, at that time, was
saying the shots came from Houston and Elm.
fred
My careful seeing/hearing/reading of Brehm's wordage tells me that at no time did Brehm ever say that he heard shots coming from the TSBD.
Brehm did say where he thort the shots came from. But that is not the same thing.
Brehm said that he heard the shots coming from a building which was not the TSBD.
And he made no subsequent statements re where he heard the shots coming from.
All of his subsequent statements were re where he thort the shots came from.
6
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Gunman in the pergola window...
« Last post by Royell Storing on Today at 01:26:47 PM »
Quote from: Tom Graves on Today at 12:31:39 AM


      Do you have a problem comprehending what, "UNEQUIVOCALLY Match" means? This declaration leaves no room for hedging. Which is exactly what You and "The Nutty Professor" need in order to repeatedly retract his conclusions time-after-time-after-time.
7
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: S. M. Holland's "Smoke" on the Grassy Knoll
« Last post by Royell Storing on Today at 01:13:54 PM »
Quote from: Marjan Rynkiewicz on Today at 12:02:32 AM
Donahue did make a major error. This was re the ricochet re Oswald's missed first shot.
Donahue thort that this hit the road pavement & bits ended up hitting jfk & bits ended up in the limo.
This iz koz he tried to tick all of the boxes re the Xray & witnesses re a bullet hitting the pavement & re bits of bullet in the limo etc.
Hiz other error was that he ignored the evidences that Hickey fired a plurality of shots (at least 4).
And then McLaren came along with JFK the Smoking Gun. And he too failed to see that Hickey fired at least 4 shots.
And then i solved the Hickey thing in 2024.
I uzed the good work of Holland re the ricochet offa the overhead signal arm.
But Holland too had some silly ideas re the ricochet.
And then i solved the ricochet thing in 2023.

    There is ZERO Evidence than a shot hit the "overhead signal arm". You got Holland blowing off about this, and the Sixth Floor Museum giving him the platform to do it, but in FACT, there is literally nothing. Some guy ran into that traffic signal and knocked it down. Gary Mack called Holland about it being down and they went through that thing with a fine tooth comb. Found NOTHING.
    With respect to a possible SA Hickey AR-15 firing spree, I do believe there is evidence of this having happened. I can Not say this "spree" struck JFK, but I do believe there is evidence that those shots did cause damage inside Dealey Plaza. I believe Hickey's AR-15 firing burst went in the general direction of Gordon Arnold. If you are interested let me know. I'll direct you to what I believe is Image Evidence of the damage caused inside Dealey Plaza.
8
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Mark Lane and Charles Brehm
« Last post by Michael Capasse on Today at 11:56:50 AM »
Quote from: Fred Litwin on Today at 11:49:27 AM
You are missing my point. It is about Lane's intellectual dishonesty. He asked Brehm in the interview where the shots came from, and Brehm answered him. Lane
did not include the answer in his film. But he did infer from Brehm's other statements where the shots came from.

On the other hand, I don't believe the Dallas Times Herald, because Jay Skaggs took a few photographs of Brehm on November 22nd and in his oral history project, says that Brehm, at that time, was
saying the shots came from Houston and Elm.

fred

Actually, he never asked from what direction the shots came. He asked what direction the particles flew.
..and your opinion on hearsay from a reporter in an oral history project years later doesn't mean very much.

Mark Lane: Did you see any particles of the President's skull fly when the bullet struck him in the head?
Charles Brehm: I saw a piece fly over, oh, in the area of the curb where I was standing.

Mark Lane: And in which direction did that fly?
Charles Brehm: It seemed to have have come left and back.
9
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Mark Lane and Napoleon Daniels
« Last post by Fred Litwin on Today at 11:49:52 AM »
https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/mark-lane-and-napoleon-daniels

Mark Lane and Napoleon Daniels

Sylvia Meagher was outraged at the way Lane used the Daniels' story. She felt this made Rush to Judgment dishonest. Read her comments on the film.
10
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Mark Lane and Charles Brehm
« Last post by Fred Litwin on Today at 11:49:27 AM »
You are missing my point. It is about Lane's intellectual dishonesty. He asked Brehm in the interview where the shots came from, and Brehm answered him. Lane
did not include the answer in his film. But he did infer from Brehm's other statements where the shots came from.

On the other hand, I don't believe the Dallas Times Herald, because Jay Skaggs took a few photographs of Brehm on November 22nd and in his oral history project, says that Brehm, at that time, was
saying the shots came from Houston and Elm.

fred
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10