Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1

Here's what Dr. Greg Henkelmann, a radiation oncologist, has said about Dr. Mantik's OD research on the skull x-rays:

Unlike other evidence, optical density data are as “theory free” as possible, as this data deals only with physical measurements. To reject alteration of the JFK skull X-rays is to reject basic physics and radiology. Dr. Mantik has a PhD in physics and has practiced radiation oncology for nearly 40 years; he is thus eminently qualified in both physics and radiology. His unusual background exposes the government-sponsored cover-up that has deceived Americans into believing that Oswald was a “lone wolf.” It is now far past time to be crying wolf. (Introduction in Dr. Mantik's 2022 book JFK Assassination Paradoxes)

If anyone wants to read about Dr. Henkelmann's education and qualifications, here's a brief summary of his credentials:

https://www.womans.org/findadoctor/gregory-c-henkelmann

Explain how being a radiation oncologist qualifies one as an expert in forensic pathology.
2
      Why let the eggheads complicate the JFK Brain Issue? (1) JFK Brain Missing + (2) JFK brain weight Not documented  = Bogus Autopsy

The fact that JFK's brain might be missing or that it was not weighed does not change the fact that it was Oswald who put a bullet through that brain.
Conspiracy theorists regard every anomaly as proof of conspiracy when at most it is proof of incompetence. Yes, the original autopsy team was not experienced in forensic pathology and were a poor choice for the autopsy. Had the assassination followed the same procedures that were used for any other homicide, we would not have had these shortcomings. Jackie should not have been given the choice as to where the autopsy should be performed. The widow of any other gunshot victim would not have been given that choice. An experienced forensic medical examiner from the DC area should have been selected to conduct the autopsy. As it was, Jackie chose Bethesda Naval Hospital and the prosectors were experienced in doing autopsies on people who died of cancer or heart ailments. A different standard is required for victims of homicides because of legal requirements. Unfortunately, we don't get a do over for that mistake and are left to make the best of what we do have. The original photos and x-rays were made available to the HSCA FPP and they unanimously agreed with the fundamental findings of the original autopsy team while recognizing the errors of omission that were made.
3

 I circled a three wheel motorcycle on the right side of a frame from the Darnell film, and the officer with one glove off is walking toward it.  Could it be that Haygood made the transmission he made at 12:35 from the circled 3-wheel motorcycle which he's walking towards? 



    If we could see the entire Darnell Film with the clarity of the above Darnell still frame, a lot of questions would be answered. Like, what is this alleged DPD motorcycle cop NOW holding in his (L) hand? Earlier in the Darnell Film, he has nothing in that (L) hand as he walks along the entire string of train cars. Now, as he advances toward/down the Elm St Extension he suddenly is griping something in his (L) hand. What is he holding in that (L) hand as he slips past Officer Harkness?   
4
Thanks very much James. That’s helpful. I think that we are interpreting what we see in the Wiegman film frame differently. I see two different cars in the gap between fedora man and purse lady. In the following image I have drawn yellow arrows, one pointing at the right taillight of the Pontiac and another one pointing at the front right wheel of the Pontiac. Please notice that my interpretation of the Weigman frame has the taillight lined up with the western edge of the opening for the large gates and the front right wheel to the camera right of the post. While your interpretation (image) has the taillight lined up with a point on that surface a few feet further west and the front right wheel to the camera left of the post.






   Bearing in mind that the "getaway" car was 17.5 Feet Long, you're telling me that a 12 Foot long Civil War Canon could also be sitting in this same space and Not be filmed by Wiegman? How about a 6 Man Firing Squad? This is how ridiculous this, "It's there, you just can't see it", claim is.
5
  With respect to the Hackrotte "visual aids", they were wrong on: (1) Lego Fedora Man, (2) Lego shadows on the Island, (3) Huge Gates "shadows" revealing them to be open when Euins went by them on the Harkness 3 wheel motorcycle. That is not a good track record. Like I said, "your call".
  You need to be specific. When you say "post", I do not know which specific "post" you are referencing.
  If you don't want to find a good copy of the Towner Film and check out the position of Fedora Man, that's another "your call". Failure to carefully examine that which is in plain sight is exactly why this case remains unsolved after 62+ years.   
   

   Retention and compression issues made obvious once again.
6
      Why let the eggheads complicate the JFK Brain Issue? (1) JFK Brain Missing + (2) JFK brain weight Not documented  = Bogus Autopsy
7
Junk science.

I'll go with the opinion of the qualified members of the HSCA FPP that affirmed the original conclusion that JFK was hit twice from behind, once in the upper back and once in the back of the head. No qualified medical examiner who has looked at the autopsy material has ever disagreed with that finding. I find that far more compelling than the opinions of amateur sleuths who refuse to accept the fact that Oswald fired the shots that killed JFK and that no one has ever presented credible evidence he had even a single accomplice in his crime.
8
Those who are determined to believe the JFK autopsy materials have not been altered reject the hard scientific evidence of optical-density (OD) measurements that prove the autopsy skull x-rays have been altered. The OD measurements of the skull x-rays also prove that the autopsy brain photos are fraudulent, that they cannot be photos of JFK's brain.

Those who reject this historic scientific evidence fall into two groups. One group consists of lone-gunman theorists, all of whom claim that not a single item of evidence in the JFK case has been faked or altered. The other group consists of conspiracy theorists who believe that only a few items of evidence have been faked or altered, and whose theory of the case does not allow for alteration of any photographic evidence, including the autopsy x-rays and photos.

One such conspiracy theorist has argued that OD measurements are only valid when they are done on bone, not on metal, that OD measurements cannot determine the thickness of metal. This is incorrect. OD measurements can measure the thickness of metal by calculating the amount of light absorbed (\(OD=\log _{10}(1/T)\)). As the metal becomes thicker, it becomes more opaque, allowing for a direct, non-contact measurement of thickness based on its light-shielding ability. Similarly, OD measurements can also measure the thickness of wood. They can even measure the thickness of clear glass via optical reflection (triangulation) or interferometry.

Multiple OD measurements of JFK's skull x-rays have found that the x-rays show about 70% of the right side of the brain to be missing. Impressively, these measurements has been confirmed by independent analyses of the skull x-rays. In 1975, Dr. Fred Hodges, then the chief of neuroradiology at the John Hopkins medical school, was asked to examine the JFK autopsy materials for the Rockefeller Commission. Among other things, he noted in his report that a "goodly portion" of the right brain was missing:         

AP and two lateral views show. . . . A goodly portion of the right brain is apparently missing and the anterior part of the right cranial cavity contains air. ("Kennedy-Connally Shooting," report prepared for the Rockefeller Commission, April 1975, p. 2, available at https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=32027#relPageId=3)

Other private experts, including Dr. Gary Aguilar, have likewise concluded the skull x-rays show a large amount of the right brain to be missing.

In 1992, none other than Dr. James Humes, the chief JFK autopsy doctor, admitted to JAMA that "two thirds of the right cerebrum had been blown away" (Journal of the American Medical Association [JAMA], May 27, 1992, p. 2798). The right cerebrum is the right-hand side of the brain.

The JFK autopsy brain photos are among the most powerful, undeniable evidences of fraud in the JFK autopsy materials. Not realizing the enormous implications of his admission, Dr. Michael Baden, the chairman of the HSCA's Forensic Pathology Panel, revealed to WC apologist Vincent Bugliosi that the autopsy brain photos show only 1-2 ounces of brain matter missing. However, in addition to the fact that the skull x-rays show 2/3 of the right brain to be missing, we know that bits of JFK's brain were blown onto 16 surfaces, and that numerous witnesses said a substantial portion of JFK's brain was missing.

Multiple OD measurements have also proved that the 6.5 mm object is not metallic. For years everyone assumed the 6.5 mm object was a bullet fragment, but OD measurements have disproved that assumption. Dr. David Mantik has even been able to duplicate the method that was used to add the 6.5 mm object to the AP x-ray. The three innocent explanations offered for the 6.5 mm object are vacuous and impossible. Even before the OD measurements were done, many researchers noted that the 6.5 mm object could not have come from an FMJ bullet, that no FMJ bullet would have deposited such a fragment on the outer table of the skull.

Here's what Dr. Greg Henkelmann, a radiation oncologist, has said about Dr. Mantik's OD research on the skull x-rays:

Unlike other evidence, optical density data are as “theory free” as possible, as this data deals only with physical measurements. To reject alteration of the JFK skull X-rays is to reject basic physics and radiology. Dr. Mantik has a PhD in physics and has practiced radiation oncology for nearly 40 years; he is thus eminently qualified in both physics and radiology. His unusual background exposes the government-sponsored cover-up that has deceived Americans into believing that Oswald was a “lone wolf.” It is now far past time to be crying wolf. (Introduction in Dr. Mantik's 2022 book JFK Assassination Paradoxes)

If anyone wants to read about Dr. Henkelmann's education and qualifications, here's a brief summary of his credentials:

https://www.womans.org/findadoctor/gregory-c-henkelmann
9
Just like I said.

Dear Sonderführer Storing,

You said something was off by eleven inches?

-- Tom
10
Correction. This is never easy. While attempting to make a 3D version of my 2D texture map version of the Bonneville i found that I accidentally used a car length of about 18.5' rather than the true 17.5' value. When corrected that will compress the previous model by about 5%. Keeping the nose of the car at the same location the tail will appear shortened about 11". Sorry friends :-X

James

    Just like I said.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10