Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
All commenters are working off evidence presented by researchers that present facts, a photo here a statement from evidence there. We all learn as we go along. I discovered where the head shooter was from the Z-film. Evidence from K's X-rays proves he was shot from a ground location. Like the storm drain at the corner of Elm and Houston that was later removed by Dallas as part of a coverup. K's back wound was at an upward angle as the pass-through slug went on to make the dent by the mirror. Where else could this shot have come from? Not Oswald.
2
Why does anybody care who Prayer Man was. Do we need to identify every spectator in Dealey Plaza to figure out who shot JFK?
3
This is embarrassing. This stuff qualifies as belonging in the "lunatic fringe" of the pro-conspiracy camp.

What's that old saying about the pot and the kettle?
4
They were testing a shot sequence that does not conflict with the evidence. That’s all I was saying.  They were just trying to see if three shots beginning about z208 and ending at z313 could be made. The found that it was possible. And, in at least one case, none missed.

You seem to think that I somehow invented the three shot no miss scenario.  Anyone looking at the evidence can see that there is evidence that each of the three shots struck in the limo.  If that wasn’t the case the WC would not have had a section explaining why they could not determine which shot missed.

The shot sequence they chose to test was the least plausible one of those proposed by the WC. Why CBS chose that one is a head scratcher. To make matters worse, Cronkite made a blatantly false statement when he claimed the WC said the first shot was fired at Z210 which is how the 5.6 second time limit was arrived at. It had to be a low point in Cronkite's career to make a mistake that bad. All he had to do was read the conclusions paragraph at the end of the chapter dealing with the shots Oswald fired. Instead, he relied on myths that had been created, most notably by Josiah Thompson's silly title Six Seconds in Dallas. a fictitious examination of the JFKA. The WC never concluded that the all 3 shots were fired in under 6 seconds and anyone who believes they did has either neither read the WCR or has a very serious reading comprehension problem.
5
Michael: You are correct. I was wrong to say you believed there was shooter on top of the linen truck. That was made by another poster the Edu Forum.

I apologize.

However, I stand by my other comments about how your conspiracy beliefs contradict one another. You cannot believe in the HSCA acoustic evidence analysis which concluded there were two shooters - on from the TSBD and another behind the fence - and also believe, as you do, there were multiple gunman firing from in front of JFK. And that, as you stated, it was "possible" that Babushka Lady shot JFK with a camera gun.

Your conspiracy claims are at odds with each, are inconsistent, and are illogical.
6
The JFK Assassination - Discussion & Debate / Re: The First Shot
« Last post by John Corbett on Today at 02:06:38 PM »
So you think O shooting from 90 feet in the air downward at a 60 or 70 degree angle made a wound through K at an upward angle??? REALLY? A one inch long slug penetrates skin the turns upward to exit K's throat above the entrance wound. Like to see that happen in a test.

The back wound was above the exit wound in the throat. Profile views of JFK on the autopsy table and from the re-enactment conducted by the Secret Service clearly show that to be true.
7
No bullet wounds on either men could have come from SBD window. No wounds line up with O being the shooter.
8
JC's wrist was hit by head shot fragment as he was holding his wrist in the air while leaning back. He was directly down range from head shooter. Nelly said she believed it was the third shot that hit C's wrist. It would have been right in front of her face.

Do you have any idea how laughable the things you propose are?
9
The JFK Assassination - Discussion & Debate / Re: When Was JBC Hit?
« Last post by John Corbett on Today at 02:03:06 PM »
Well JC said he wasn't hit until after he turned and was turning back in his seat. Not same time as K was hit. Shot through back while turned means a shooter elsewhere in Plaza. Do you know where it came from? I do. Location even shows in Z-film.

JFK and JBC were hit at the same time and reacted at the same time in much the same manner. Both suddenly flipped their arms upward at Z226 in perfect unison. At the time they were hit, they were in a direct line going back to the sniper's nest. The bullet Oswald fired through JFK's upper torso and exiting from his throat couldn't have missed JBC.
10
The JFK Assassination - Discussion & Debate / Re: Reasonable Doubts?
« Last post by Ted Sager on Today at 02:02:35 PM »
JC's wrist was hit by head shot fragment as he was holding his wrist in the air while leaning back. He was directly down range from head shooter. Nelly said she believed it was the third shot that hit C's wrist. It would have been right in front of her face.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10