Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
The JFK Assassination - Discussion & Debate / DiEugenio Promotes Prayer Man Scam To Congress
« Last post by Brian Doyle on Today at 09:15:55 AM »
Quote from: Royell Storing on Yesterday at 09:59:51 PM
   OK, so let's go at this another way. How did Prof G. Wiliam Jones "manage" to make a, "1st generation film-to-film copy of Darnell"?

Professor Jones probably made his copy in the 1970's when it was easier to simply approach NBC and order a copy...At the time Jones made his copy the technology was film to film copying...We know Jones made his copy film to film because the 6th Floor Museum copy is probably a celluloid copy...But most importantly we know Jones made his copy film to film because that was the only way the features could get sharper in the actual images...In short, what we see from the 6th Floor Museum copy with its better detail is proof in itself that the copy is film to film...One thing we know for certain is that the Prayer Man people will never look in to any of this because they are dishonest and they avoid pursuing anything they know will disprove them...


 
Quote from: Royell Storing on Yesterday at 09:59:51 PM
And the say-so of Gary Mack carries absolutely no weight. He was Wrong on: (1) Badge Man, (2) The McKinnon/Mumford ID, and (3) The Acoustic Evidence.

Mack was there and he probably talked to Jones about his copy...Or saw it in person...Again, the Prayer Man people will do no inquiry or seeking on this because they are trying to avoid admitting that the Jones collection copy is 1st generation and therefore possesses technical reasons why the dress neckline is real and therefore refutes the bogus Greg Parker Prayer Man theory...They could approach Jones' son but won't...
2
The JFK Assassination - Discussion & Debate / Re: The Charlie Kirk conspiracy theories have officially begun
« Last post by Benjamin Cole on Today at 09:03:36 AM »
When COVID-19 emerged, I suspected its origin was a lab leak in Wuhan, China. I had a lot of reason, but that's another story.

At one point the Columbia Journalism Review, the industry flag-carrier, called the lab leak narrative a "debunked conspiracy theory." The CT'ers were small and ridiculed band.

Later, the lab leak theory became somewhat accepted as the more-likely explanation of the COVID-19 virus.

Lesson: Some CT's hold water, and some do not.

I suspect Charlie Kirk was murdered by a mentally ill lone nut.
3
The JFK Assassination - Discussion & Debate / Re: How Mrs. Connally Described Her Husband Being Shot-HSCA
« Last post by Benjamin Cole on Today at 08:58:09 AM »
AM--

I am the first to concede that identifying the exact frame JBC is shot...well, I am guessing.

JBC's mouth gapes open after Z-295, maybe toward Z-300 or later, as if he is in pain.

Humans take more than one-tenth of a second to register pain, generally, or so I have read.

Mrs. Connally's face is somewhat obscured, and, of course, this is a blurry home movie we are watching.

She seems to turn towards JBC after Z-300.

Maybe Dallas Sheriff Seymour Weitzman and SS agent Kellerman were correct: The second two audible shots were in close sequence. They were both familiar with firearms, and seemed to lack any axes to grind.

Just IMHO.

 
4
Worldly & Other Worldly Mysteries - UFOs/UAPs - Bigfoot - Ghosts etc / Re: Creepiest thing ever?
« Last post by Duncan MacRae on Today at 07:47:30 AM »
5
The JFK Assassination - Discussion & Debate / Re: How Mrs. Connally Described Her Husband Being Shot-HSCA
« Last post by Andrew Mason on Today at 05:32:22 AM »
Quote from: Benjamin Cole on Today at 04:26:02 AM
.

Well, again, my layman's view is that Gov. JBC is pushed forward ~Z-295. Maybe a few frames later, and he falls into his wife's lap about the time JFK is struck.

But when does Nellie stop looking at JFK and turn to look at her husband? That is where she put the second shot.

I am not sure what motion you are referring to at z295. Can you elaborate?

How about the motion of JBC just before he falls back on his wife?:


Quote
There is a consensus that JFK is struck at Z-313.

IMHO, the JBC-JFK strikes are less than one second apart (18 fps) and that lines up with Seymour Weitzman's testimony that the last two audible shots on 11.22 were nearly simultaneous. SS agent Kellerman described the last two audible shots as a "flurry."

Most witnesses described distinct shots and many estimated that the space between the last two was about half that between 1 and 2.
6
The JFK Assassination - Discussion & Debate / Re: How Mrs. Connally Described Her Husband Being Shot-HSCA
« Last post by Benjamin Cole on Today at 04:26:02 AM »
AM--

Thanks for your collegial inquiry.

Well, again, my layman's view is that Gov. JBC is pushed forward ~Z-295. Maybe a few frames later, and he falls into his wife's lap about the time JFK is struck.

There is a consensus that JFK is struck at Z-313.

IMHO, the JBC-JFK strikes are less than one second apart (18 fps) and that lines up with Seymour Weitzman's testimony that the last two audible shots on 11.22 were nearly simultaneous. SS agent Kellerman described the last two audible shots as a "flurry."

LHO had a single-shot-per-bolt-action rifle. LHO was a good shot, and maybe he got lucky that day. The M-L short rifle was built to solid military specs, accurate to 200 meters.

But I don't see how LHO fired rapidly enough to be a lone assassin.

7
The JFK Assassination - Discussion & Debate / Re: The Charlie Kirk conspiracy theories have officially begun
« Last post by Tom Graves on Today at 03:16:32 AM »
Quote from: John Corbett on Yesterday at 09:06:53 PM
No matter how much evidence is presented that Tyler Robinson committed the crime, there will be those who will refuse to accept that. Leftists will blame those on the right and those on the right will blame leftists, and none of them will have any evidence to support their suspicions. Just like the JFKA CTs.

And Putin's professional trolls inflame both sides.

8
The JFK Assassination - Discussion & Debate / Re: How Mrs. Connally Described Her Husband Being Shot-HSCA
« Last post by Andrew Mason on Today at 03:05:24 AM »
Quote from: Benjamin Cole on Today at 01:48:09 AM

Another bit of Mrs. Connally's testimony, again indicating JBC was pushed forward at the moment he was struck from behind by a large slug, that tunneled along a rib, meeting resistance, and pushing his body forward.



As I see it, JBC lunge or is pushed forward ~Z-295
That is helpful to have that testimony from Nellie Connally.  She provides a time for the sound of the second shot: at the moment she shopped looking at JFK and turned to look at JBC. Where do you see that occurring? She says that JBC moved or “lunged” forward.  Greer said he turned to the rear almost simultaneously with hearing the second shot and Hickey said JFK’s hair flew up on the second shot.  Where do you see those things occurring?  I may be wacko in my thinking according to some on this board, but I would suggest that if all these things can be seen within a few frames of each other that would be good evidence of when the second shot occurred.

Quote
The LNT-SBT theorizing evolved in response to President LBJ's diktat that LHO be found a LN with no leads to Havana or Moscow (no nuke war please), and the WC's subsequent necessity in making the evidence line up with that premise.

There were three loud shots heard deep inside the TSBD on 11.22, and that indicates there was in fact a TSBD6 sniper who fired three shots. Prime suspect is LHO.

The problem is the shot cadence---the shots that strike JBC and JFK are too close together to have been fired by a lone gunsel armed with a single-shot bolt action rifle. The "bang....bang-bang" cadence. Dallas Sheriff Seymour Weitzman described the last two shots as nearly "simultaneous." A man with much experience in firearms.
I agree that the evidence is very strong that the last two were closer together and in rapid succession. But that does not tell us whether they were too close to have been fired from a bolt action rifle.  That’s really the issue. Locating the time of the second shot based on the evidence, not speculation, is the way to resolve that question, in my opinion. What’s your view?
9
The JFK Assassination - Discussion & Debate / Re: The smell of gunpowder
« Last post by Ted Sager on Today at 02:25:24 AM »
A large firecracker would have produced gunpowder smell, as no shots were fired from GK.
10
The JFK Assassination - Discussion & Debate / Re: Which Six Books Would You Recommend to a Newcomer?
« Last post by David Von Pein on Today at 01:53:00 AM »
Quote from: Michael T. Griffith on July 06, 2026, 04:10:52 PM
Wow, so you wouldn't recommend a single pro-conspiracy book to a newcomer...

That's correct, I wouldn't.

But if I was being forced at gunpoint by a foaming-at-the-mouth conspiracy fantasist to recommend just one conspiracy-leaning JFKA book, it would be this one by Gus Russo:



But there are some big problems with that book too, which I talk about HERE.


Quote from: Michael T. Griffith on July 06, 2026, 04:10:52 PM
...and you'd recommend the Warren Commission's report to a newcomer but not the House Select Committee on Assassinations report.

That's correct. And that's because the HSCA's Dictabelt-based conclusion that JFK "was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy" has since been completely discredited and disproven.

But the first five conclusions that we find on THIS PAGE of the HSCA's Final Report are things that should be read by everybody. (And those 5 findings have never been proven to be wrong.)


Quote from: Michael T. Griffith on July 06, 2026, 04:10:52 PM
On a side note, did you not notice that the thread is about which six books you'd recommend to a newcomer, not which 10 books.




Quote from: Michael T. Griffith on July 06, 2026, 04:10:52 PM
FYI, the 10 books that you list contradict each other on some key issues, such as the location of the rear head entry wound, the trajectory of the back-wound bullet, the location of the back wound, the position of JFK and Connally in the limo during the alleged hit of the single-bullet theory, and the 6.5 mm object on the autopsy skull x-rays.

But each of those books does something that no pro-conspiracy book has ever done --- i.e., follow the actual evidence in the case to where it all leads—a single gunman named Lee Harvey Oswald—without resorting to conjecture, speculation, guesswork, and unsupportable claims of fake evidence.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10