Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Larry Hancock thinks SAVAK may have been involved in the RFKA, manipulating Palestinian activists.

I'm guessing Hancock doesn't believe in the Single Bullet Hypothesis.

Pity that.

Quote
The IRGC has targeted Trump a few times.

How dare they do that to The Traitorous Orange Turd!!!
2
The IRGC has targeted Trump a few times.

How dare they!
3
TG--

Larry Hancock thinks SAVAK may have been involved in the RFKA, manipulating Palestinian activists.

So far, no Iranians in the JFKA.

The IRGC has targeted Trump a few times.
4
LP--

You ask interesting questions.

Veteran researcher Larry Hancock wrote a book recently on LHO, with David Boylan.

They contend LHO was only a wayward, antsy earnest Marxist, and they agree with you that LHO's behavior was not that of a guilty party.

I posited to Hancock (a very civil and smart fellow) that LHO had taken a potshot at Walker, and Hancock somewhat demurred. Given the evidence, I contend LHO at least took a shot in Walker's direction, and also likely had a ride that night.

Meaning LHO had confederates.

My take is LHO's immediate post-JFK behavior is that of someone complicit or thought he had been framed, or even both (he was left holding the bag). Johnny Calvin Brewer's testimony is interesting. LHO furtive behavior in the alcove of Brewer's shoe store, and then sneaking into the Texas Theater...not that of someone uninvolved in the JFKA. This, after LHO armed himself.

But human nature is not always predictable, and LHO was likely (in my layman's opinion) suffering from some forms of mental illness. He may have been cool and calm in police custody...but LHO also panicked and shot JD Tippit dead.

Caveat emptor, and draw your own conclusions.






5
Your Solie-CT has more plausibility than other CTs and LNTs.

Gee, thanks.

All other, or just a few?

Regardless, I'll try to incorporate Castro's G2 and / or the Iranians into it for you.
6
TG:

Your Solie-CT has more plausibility than other CTs, and LNT's.

7
Hey, believe it not, I’m still considering it because I just cannot dismiss a supermajority of witness on the 1… 2..3 pattern and I really don’t see the shooter misfiring the 1st shot accidentally or haphazardly aiming because he was excited.

Yours is the only alternative LN theory so no harm testing it out some more. It would be nice though if a computer AI could be used.
Always good to keep an open mind. 

If the last two shots were in quick succession as the witnesses overwhelmingly reported, and the head shot was the last then it follows that the first shot did not miss. We can see JFK already well into his reaction to his neck wound by z224:

and that is almost five full seconds before the head shot. Not many would describe shots five seconds part as rapid.

Quote
.
It appears on the Z film from Z133-Z190 that JC was maintaining a 45 degree turned right angle of his upper body and looking at the crowd to the right side of limo the whole way.
You may wish to check that again.  JBC is looking left and facing forward in the Croft photo which corresponds to z161.


Quote
Therefore i think the most comfortable position would be that JC was sitting on the jump seat with both his legs turned 45 degrees rightward so that he could maintain that 45 degree upper body position without having to twist his torso. And I doubt he would have had half his buttocks off the left side of the seat as in JohnMs diagram. Nor imo would he hold his hat upside over the left side of his left leg because he would have to keep his arm stretched diagonally across his chest to do so. I see no indication his right arm is diagonally across his chest from Z133-Z200, so JohnM diagram is improbable.

One can also conclude that JBC was not sitting with a buttock off the left side of his seat because we can see that he is not sitting like that in any of the photos. 
Quote
This alternative simplifies  the Z190 shot 1st because now the shot just goes past JC without hitting his thigh, thus apparent absence of physical reaction by JC to being hit by a bullet is no longer an issue.
That bullet exiting JFK slowed down to 1500 ff/sec likely goes  into the middle lower part of the front seat cushion and could have stopped there or if it continued thru, it gets embedded in the lower dashboard. That could be CE 399 which fell out and was found in the limo later or it’s the “lost “ bullet.
That scenario would depend on the Secret Service and FBI missing a hole in the upholstery or an impact mark in the car.

Quote
The Z270 shot could also be the CE 399 shot because that’s when JC had raised his hat up against or close to his chest and his right hand is rotated with the palm facing away from his chest as the well of the hat is visible.
The impact that JBC described can only occur with a significant and sudden change in momentum of the bullet. That had to have occurred on striking the fifth rib. A full speed bullet impacting bone like that would deform, as Larry Sturdivan testified to the HSCA. When you the factor in the irregular characteristics of the chest exit wound and the wrist wound and clothing, not to mention the evidence of Tague that he was hit on the second shot, it is highly unlikely that a full speed bullet striking JBC first could end up as CE399.

Quote
So if you are able to figure out the angle of the shot going thru JC at Z270 then maybe you can determine if it’s plausible or not that the bullet could go thru JCs wrist where he had his hand up at Z 270 , exit thru his lower palm and continue on to hit his inner left thigh.
The main reason the bullet that made the thigh does not fit with the bullet that caused the wrist wound is the striking difference in wound characteristics. The thigh wound looked like it was made by the butt end of an intact missile.  No one said that about the wrist wound.
8
TG-

The case against Bruce Solie is entirely based circumstantial evidence, and even there we hardly have a complete record.

There are no wiretaps, no confessions, no confirmed meetings between Solie and KGB'ers, etc. No records of financial inducement, or that Solie was blackmailed for being a homosexual, etc.

Solie was never put on trial, and is too dead now to mount a defense, or provide explanations or an alternative narrative.

Nor has anyone in the KGB ever said, "Yeah, Solie was one of ours."

You have CT against Solie, as does Newman.

I lean towards Solie being a KGB asset, but I recognize what I have is a suspicion, a CT, not a fact.

Lean towards?

Does "conspiracy theory" have the same connotation when applied to a CIA employee who conspired with the KGB to destroy the CIA and to further the goals of the Kremlin (but not to assassinate JFK) as it does when it's applied to someone who preaches that the Military Industrial Intelligence-Community Complex Deep State National Security State, perhaps in conjunction with your beloved MOSSAD, killed JFK?
9
TG-

The case against Bruce Solie is entirely based circumstantial evidence, and even there we hardly have a complete record.

There are no wiretaps, no confessions, no confirmed meetings between Solie and KGB'ers, etc. No records of financial inducement, or that Solie was blackmailed for being a homosexual, etc.

Solie was never put on trial, and is too dead now to mount a defense, or provide explanations or an alternative narrative.

Nor has anyone in the KGB ever said, "Yeah, Solie was one of ours."

You have CT against Solie, as does Newman.

I lean towards Solie being a KGB asset, but I recognize what I have is a suspicion, a CT, not a fact.
10
I didn't think it was possible but your empty speculation gets more and more ridiculous as time goes on. Conspirators holding special "objects" so as to identify them as "friendly" to their other conspirators? Imaginary policemen mingling freely among real policemen and nobody notices or says a word? Delusional!

   SHANKS - I am bumping this again. Above, YOU are claiming the Bogus Motorcycle Cop was "mingling freely among real policemen...". Either supply the evidence to support YOUR CLAIM or Retract It. You and another on this Forum like to throw  BS: out there. Well, I am calling You on this. If my claim is that outlandish, you should Not have to make stuff up to try and disprove it.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10