Recent Posts
That was his MO for years. He'd come to McAdams group for a while and as you said, get slapped around and then leave for months at a time. Then he'd come back. I wonder how many groups he bounced around among.
I use the AI app that came with my laptop which is CoPilot. I think that's the Microsoft AI app. I have a smartphone but i hate the thing and rarely use any apps with it. I was happy with my flip phone until Spectrum fiber optic became available in my area and I save money by bundling TV, internet, and mobile. If it weren't for that, I'd probably go back to my flip phone. The smartphone does nothing to make my life easier. CoPilot is useful but I wouldn't bet on the accuracy of its answers.
I haven't seen anything from Bob Harris in years. Before McAdams passed. He was a regular here for years. He got slapped around pretty bad and left.
I know well the problem of inaccuracy with Ai, but Grok has a good record from my experience. Not perfect mind you. But the following is worth considering
https://x.com/i/grok/share/f4b0c295a9a446d880d81dd59cb3e15e
I hadn't seen anything from Bob Harris since McAdams' forum went dark. Has he posted in other forums recently?
Conspiracy theory is not a negative term. Conspiracies do exist and sometimes they are part of high-profile crimes. Watergate was a conspiracy. So was Iran-contra gate. The Lincoln assassination was a conspiracy even though the shooting was carried out by one man.
9/11 was obviously a conspiracy.
Some crimes are conspiracies while others are the work of one individual. The important thing is to determine if there is credible evidence that a particular crime was carried out by more than one individual. In the case of the JFKA, no such credible evidence exists. It all points to Oswald alone. For the most part JFK-CTs try to make their case with excuses to dismiss all the damning evidence against Oswald, not by providing concrete evidence that others were involved. They figure out a long time ago that the latter was a dead-end street. Now, it's all about coming up with excuses to dismiss all the evidence of Oswald's guilt.
When I first read this, I thought you were being facetious but the more I thought about this, I wonder if that could have been a real problem. By allowing the Navy corpsman to assist in the search of the limo, it could be argued that the Secret Service had failed to secure the crime scene, and the limo was a crime scene. That could make any evidence collected from the limo inadmissible. Since the fragmented bullet was from the kill shot to the head, without those fragments being admitted, it could be problematic proving Oswald had caused the death of JFK. Henry Wade could have still prosecuted Oswald for Tippit's murder and that too was a capital crime, but it might not have been possible to convict Oswald for JFK's murder.
This might seem a bit farfetched but keep in mind this was before the Warren Court greatly expanding the exclusionary rule which allowed defense attorneys to get incriminating evidence dismissed on very technical grounds. I can't remember the exact case but I seem to remember a case where the police department had seized a car and taken it to a private garage to be searched for evidence. It turned out the city's contract with the private garage had expired so technically the car was no longer in possession of the police department and therefore all the evidence taken from the car was ruled inadmissible.
If there are any lawyers among our readers, I wonder if they could weigh in on this issue.
When I first read this, I thought you were being facetious but the more I thought about this, I wonder if that could have been a real problem. By allowing the Navy corpsman to assist in the search of the limo, it could be argued that the Secret Service had failed to secure the crime scene, and the limo was a crime scene. That could make any evidence collected from the limo inadmissible. Since the fragmented bullet was from the kill shot to the head, without those fragments being admitted, it could be problematic proving Oswald had caused the death of JFK. Henry Wade could have still prosecuted Oswald for Tippit's murder and that too was a capital crime, but it might not have been possible to convict Oswald for JFK's murder.
This might seem a bit farfetched but keep in mind this was before the Warren Court greatly expanding the exclusionary rule which allowed defense attorneys to get incriminating evidence dismissed on very technical grounds. I can't remember the exact case but I seem to remember a case where the police department had seized a car and taken it to a private garage to be searched for evidence. It turned out the city's contract with the private garage had expired so technically the car was no longer in possession of the police department and therefore all the evidence taken from the car was ruled inadmissible.
If there are any lawyers among our readers, I wonder if they could weigh in on this issue.