Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Ben, nice job of derailing!

It appears you have become rather fixated on JBC and your G2 scenario, which have nothing to do with my original post.

I don't see that Oswald being a "dedicated Marxist" or shooting at Walker really addresses my points. Indeed, those things to some extent cut the other way. A dedicated Marxist who left no manifesto? An Oswald who left a note and arrived home in a state of agitation when he shot at Walker?

Yes, I can articulate (and have) an Oswald who was at the end of his rope for a variety of reasons and made the JFKA his last act of defiance. This STILL doesn't explain what troubles me, as set forth in my OP.

"He knew something" not accounted for by the LN narrative comes closer to an explanation - but WHAT did he know?
2
JFK Assassination Short Railroad Yard Scenes With Dallas Deputy Sheriff  Roger Dean Craig - 5 Different Speeds


         The above is NOT Motorcycle Officer Haygood.  Wiegman and Couch both filmed Officer Haygood on Elm St. The Wiegman and Couch Films show Motorcycle Officer Haygood to be wearing SUNGLASSES. Cancellare then photographed Officer Haygood as Haygood stood atop the Triple Underpass. That photograph shows Haygood wearing BOTH of his motorcycle gloves. The alleged Motorcycle Cop above is: (1) NOT wearing sunglasses, and, (2) NOT wearing BOTH motorcycle gloves. The man above is an Impostor and part of the conspiracy to assassinate JFK
3
LP--

Well, we are on different pages on this one.

LHO appeared to be a dedicated Marxist, and in something of a dead-end in his own life. LHO met with KGB'ers in MC, G2-ers in MC and possibly NO, and lived near a KGB regional HQ in Minsk.

LHO had a proclivity for shooting at major public figures, see Walker. 

Whether LHO was entirely sane 11.22 is an open question. He may not have acted rationally, by any standards. What sane person goes around shooting at major public figures?

On firmer ground--

I have reasonable doubts Gov. JBC did a 180-degree turn in his seat after being shot through his chest, and that  JBC held onto his Stetson hat in his right hand after being shot through his right wrist by a large slug that "tumbled" inside his wrist, causing a lot of damage. The WC LN theorists contend JBC was ~Z-223.

For his part, JBC said,

Connally: I was knocked over, just doubled over by the force of the bullet. It went in my back and came out my chest about 2 inches below and the left of my right nipple. The force of the bullet drove my body over almost double and when I looked, immediately I could see I was just drenched with blood. (1 HSCA 42)

JBC appears to be shoved forward ~Z-295. Less than one second before Z-313.

So the WC narrative does not hold water. There is more, but I will let it go at that.

LHO likely shot at JFK with his M-C short rifle, but that was a single-shot per bolt action rifle. LHO could not get off a shot at Z-295 and then Z-313.

There it stands.

The WC was on the LN track from the get-go, that is hardly disputed.

My guess is LHO and a couple G-2'ers perped the JFKA. 

A low-budget op, concocted in the three days after it became public the motorcade would make a hairpin turn right in front of the TSBD. Where LHO worked. That was just (bad) luck.

But an excellent location for a sniper's nest.
4
While recently watching “Hypnotic Eye”, a 1960 horror film I saw what looks like a possible fit for the Nat Geo “island” car. The 1959 Ford Fairlane Galaxy 500 has a body length of 17.5’. I’m not a car guy so more experienced car enthusiasts could have a better identification.  Anyway, I modeled my highly acclaimed “Lego Car” with a 17.5’ length and positioned it in my 3D model using a Robert Hughes frame of the doorway that shows the nose of the car. When viewing from a Wiegman position it is obvious the 17.5’ length extends about 5-6’ to the west of the black suited man. This is what Royell has stated in his postings. I had to shorten the test car to just under 12’ length to completely mask it with the black suit guy.
Edit to change model from 1958 to 1959




    As my good friend "The Nutty Professor" has proven above, the rear end of the "getaway" Car should extend close to 6 FEET beyond Fedora Man. The rear of that car should be on the Wiegman Film. NONE of the "getaway" car is present on the Wiegman Film. Why? Because it is Not there. Not Yet! Wiegman filmed the Island from many different "perspectives". Wiegman continuously filmed the Island as his Camera Car #1 turned from Houston St onto Elm St. This "getaway" car was not parked alongside the Island when Wiegman filmed the Island. That car was laying back and then began rolling down the Elm St Extension as shots were being fired at the JFK Limo. The car then pulled into the "NO PARKING At Any Time" Zone alongside the Island and back from the corner. From that parked position, it could Not be seen by law enforcement when looking Up-Down Elm St. This "getaway" car parked alongside the Island during the 20-30 second interval between Wiegman filming the Island and Couch and Darnell filming the Island as Officer Baker ran across it. The car as filmed by Couch and Darnell was parked just outside of the "wide open" Huge Gates. Those "wide open" Huge Gates permitted clandestine TSBD entry-and-exit. This was a well planned Conspiracy. 
5
As stated, I find Oswald the man the most interesting aspect of the JFKA. I’ve read everything there is about him, and my sister-in-law and her husband worked in the Minsk factory at the same time. I think I “know” him about as well as he can be known.

I’m a provisional Lone Nutter but troubled by several aspects of the narrative, including the one I’ll describe here. The standard LN response is, “The evidence says he did it. It doesn’t matter who he was, why he did it, or what was going on inside his head.” Well ...

When he took a shot at Walker (we’ll assume he did), he left behind a detailed note, and Marina said he arrived home in a state of considerable agitation. Compare the JFKA.

1. I’m puzzled by his behavior at the Paine home the evening before the JFKA. He begs Marina to join him in Dallas, makes promises, and gives absolutely no clue he is contemplating the JFKA. He leaves no note.

2. He has long been convinced he is destined for a place in history and has written fairly extensively about his views, but he leaves no explanation or manifesto concerning the JFKA. There is nothing like this in his room on Beckley.

3. He shoots JFK, stashes the rifle, scurries down the stairs, hears Baker and Truly coming up – but then is utterly calm and collected when Baker confronts him and sticks a gun in his stomach.

4. He exits the TSBD, boards a bus, leaves the bus and hails a taxi – but then offers the taxi to an older woman who approaches.

5. He is grilled by Fritz, who is a legend for wheedling confessions out of suspects – but he is so cocky and unflappable that Fritz not only fails to break him but emerges speculating that he has been trained to avoid interrogation.

6. In custody, he tells his brother Robert, “Don’t believe the so-called evidence.”

7. In custody for more than 36 hours, and despite the seemingly compelling evidence against him, he never cracks or gives anything other than flat denials of his involvement in the JFKA and Tippit shooting.

I at least find this all bizarre enough to contemplate that “something more” than the LN narrative may have been going on. It seems to me inadequate to say, "The evidence says he did it and nothing else matters." Yes, Oswald was a massive liar even when lying served no purpose, but all of the above is extremely odd and gives me pause about Oswald as a Lone Nut who just snapped. The problem is, I have no real theory as to what the “something more” might be that would explain his behavior. "He was a wholly innocent patsy" would do it, of course, but that just doesn't fit the evidence unless one postulates a conspiracy so elaborate as to be comical.

Fascinating.
6
Tennent Bagley seemed to give credence to the idea Kostikov was Dep't 13.

https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/docid-32395389.pdf
7
No, i do not agree.
Anyhow, tests on exemplars uzing AR15 hollow points & Carcano solids would show that Hickey did it.

Ridiculous. Not an ounce of evidence that is what happened.
8
And the vast majority of those who have been deeply involved with the UFO phenomenon over the past 50+ years agree with you - few think "space aliens" in saucers explains the phenomenon. Repeating the "space aliens" mantra does not make this highly mysterious phenomenon disappear.

For which there is even less evdience than "space aliens." Some of the best physicists have admitted that the "many worlds" or "multiverse" hypothesis is little more than an an entirely evidence-free effort to avoid the theistic implications of the Intelligent Design explanation for the one universe we do know exists.

As I already stated, when it comes to the origin of the cosmos, I don't rule anything in or out since we have no definitive proof of how it happened. I don't know what is more mind boggling, that there was a beginning of time or that there wasn't a beginning of time. I do believe there is life elsewhere in the universe and that some of it has evolved into intelligence equal to or greater than ours. I don't know what the odds of intelligent life forming in on any given planet but I have a hard time believing the earth is unique among the trillions of galaxies that make up the cosmos.

Somebody once asked Stephen Hawking what came before the Big Bang. He said "That's like asking what is north of the north pole.". To me, that was the equivalent of saying, "It's a mystery.". 
9
And then you look at the career of someone like Kuchar or Furyk and say, "How is this possible?"

For a tall guy,, Kuchar has one of the flattest swings on the tour. Furyk is just the opposite with a nearly vertical backswing. The guy I could never understand is Steve Stricker. He has almost no wrist cock but somehow generates enough power to be competitive. He's not one of the longest hitters but he's long enough.
Quote

One of my favorite stories is from the early says of the senior tour, when unlikely characters like Walt Zembriski were winning. There was a phenomenon of 50+ year olds who said, "I've played to a 2 handicap for years just hitting balls on Wednesday and playing on Sunday. I'll bet if I worked at it 7 days a week, I could compete out there." So they'd quit their insurance jobs and study, practice and play 7 days a week. At the end of the year, their handicap was now 5.  :D I'm going to play today at a course where I have shot par 72 once and 73 numerous times. 76 would be my age. I will be happy with 85.

Earlier on, Zembriski qualified for the US Open. He was in the locker room when Tom Weikopf saw him and thought he was the locker room attendant and handed his shoes to Zembriski to be cleaned. Zembriski told him, "I'm not the locker room attendant. I'm a player and I believe I'm a shot ahead of you."
The guy I remember from the early days of the senior tour was Charlie Owens. I think his left knee was fused so that it couldn't bend and he played cross handed but he won a tournament. He wouldn't have been able to compete if they didn't allow the seniors to ride carts. I think they still can but you don't see many of them doing it any more.
10
My Two Cents is that JFK was assassinated by Oswald alone and that we have not been visited by Alien Spacecraft. Space is just too vast. Too hard to make the journey. And there are philosophical reasons to believe that we cannot visit other starts and aliens cannot visit ours.

And the vast majority of those who have been deeply involved with the UFO phenomenon over the past 50+ years agree with you - few think "space aliens" in saucers explains the phenomenon. Repeating the "space aliens" mantra does not make this highly mysterious phenomenon disappear.

Quote
I go along with the theory that universes are being created all the time, with different properties. In most of these universes, life never forms. In a small fraction of universes, life can form and does form and sometimes develops intelligent beings that wonder how they could be so lucky.

For which there is even less evdience than "space aliens." Some of the best physicists have admitted that the "many worlds" or "multiverse" hypothesis is little more than an an entirely evidence-free effort to avoid the theistic implications of the Intelligent Design explanation for the one universe we do know exists.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10