She doesn't omit the timing of the second and third shots.  She says: "There seemed to be a pause of a few seconds, and then there were two more loud noises which she suddenly realized were shots..."

By mentioning a pause after the first of a few seconds and then two shots but not mentioning a similar pause between them, she provided a description that is consistent with her DMN story although with less specific detail.  Also, those words were written by the FBI. The DMN story and her 1988 THWKK clip were all her words.

Because she was always - and adamantly - consistent that the second and third shots were right on top of each other, my conspiratorial suggestion was that she had probably said the same thing to the FBI and that it was the FBI that had "conveniently" omitted it.

Read the Zavada report.
It's tedious but by the end of it all thoughts of alteration of the Z-film will be long gone.
It is ridiculously comprehensive.

Those would be some S-L-O-W escaping assassins. Even in his FBI statement, Summers said he hung around 15-20 minutes. In his Sixth Floor Museum interview, he said he tried to go up to the railroad yard, was turned away by Mystery Guy, went to the Postal Annex through the back entrance, discussed what he had seen with the workers (whom he knew as owner of Summers Mailing Company), called his wife and told her to turn on the TV, left the Postal Annex after 20-30 minutes, got into his truck that was parked on the Commerce extension behind the Annex, saw three Spanish-looking guys get into a car parked on Houston in front of the Annex (which doesn't mesh with what Files says), and arrived at the intersection with Houston just as they drove away ahead of him at a fast clip, whereupon he turned right onto Houston behind them and headed home to Oak Cliff. Again, pretty S-L-O-W escaping assassins, it seems to me, and I'm not sure why you'd bother driving away at a high rate of speed if you'd already hung around 30+ minutes.

https://www.c-span.org/program/public-affairs-event/kennedy-assassination-malcolm-summers/210939

This place is laughable. Nell and John Connally are not credible witnesses because both their statements to the Warren commission disagreed with Specter's single bullet theory. They both stated JBC was shot two seconds after Kennedy was shot in the neck area. The forums answer: Not credible witnesses, lunatics.
Brugoni was a CIA operative who was a trained expert in image and film analysis, gave his entire working life to the CIA and had an impeccable reputation. Brugoni stated the Zapruder film we see today is not the one he saw on 24th Novemeber 1963. The forums answer: Not a credible witness, lunatic.
Meanwhile back in Dealey Plaza Howard Brennan saw Oswald through a brick wall, described his height, weight, how good looking he was and his build, passed into onto Dallas Police and that exact description was used to identify Oswald in the cinema. The forums answer: What a guy, get that man a beer.
This forum shouldn't be called the JFK assassination forum it should be called the JFK official narrative assassination forum.
Arlen Specter, a congressman. not a lawyer, not a weapons expert, not a forensic pathologist, not an investigator, not anything but a congressman. He comes up with a theory that a bullet can do all kinds of weird things even though the Connally's told him it didn't happen that way and you believed it hook line and sinker.
Very good - crack on.

       I don't support the SBT, but Specter did graduate from Yale Law School in 1956. Give the man his due.

Brugoni is not a credible witness, as people like Pat Speer have illuminated: https://www.patspeer.com/chapter-19d-stuck-in-the-middle-with-you

Another researcher named Craig Bouzarth has also done some great work on the Z-film, and I am convinced he's once and for all shown that the film couldn't have been altered.

This place is laughable. Nell and John Connally are not credible witnesses because both their statements to the Warren commission disagreed with Specter's single bullet theory. They both stated JBC was shot two seconds after Kennedy was shot in the neck area. The forums answer: Not credible witnesses, lunatics.
Brugoni was a CIA operative who was a trained expert in image and film analysis, gave his entire working life to the CIA and had an impeccable reputation. Brugoni stated the Zapruder film we see today is not the one he saw on 24th Novemeber 1963. The forums answer: Not a credible witness, lunatic.
Meanwhile back in Dealey Plaza Howard Brennan saw Oswald through a brick wall, described his height, weight, how good looking he was and his build, passed into onto Dallas Police and that exact description was used to identify Oswald in the cinema. The forums answer: What a guy, get that man a beer.
This forum shouldn't be called the JFK assassination forum it should be called the JFK official narrative assassination forum.
Arlen Specter, a congressman. not a lawyer, not a weapons expert, not a forensic pathologist, not an investigator, not anything but a congressman. He comes up with a theory that a bullet can do all kinds of weird things even though the Connally's told him it didn't happen that way and you believed it hook line and sinker.
Very good - crack on.