Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: The First Shot
« Last post by Tom Graves on Today at 07:34:10 AM »
i agree it doesn't seem likely that a fragment from the head shot could have caused the concrete to chip, but without knowing the exit velocity of the fragments from the headshot and minimum velocity needed to chip the concrete, it's just a guess. I lean toward a ricochet from the first shot miss continuing down range and striking the curb.

"Herb Huskr" posted this on 22 August 2024 at the JFK Truth Be Told FB page:


There is some active discussion on another forum where I’m not a member about James Tague being hit, a curb mark, and what happened there. This post is about some modeling and simulation results made awhile back evaluating a possibility to explain that Tague incident.

I’ve not routinely discussed these details before because there is a back story that suggests that the modeling indicated how wrong I may have been with my initial gut feeling, and who wants to embarrass themselves by admitting they may have been misled by an erroneous gut-feeling bias?

The modeling was done a few of years back to try and prove this initial assumption:

A missing fragment from the z313 head shot could not have made it to Tague and created a shallow curb divot sending mortar/sand shards up and out, with some striking Tague in the cheek while he was standing nearby.

The envisioned scenario (initial gut feeling scenario) looked something like the following:

A disfigured lead, or lead with residual copper, bullet fragment flying forward escaped the limo from the third shot, at maybe 400 ft/sec, continued on to strike the curb with a compressive strike from a mostly horizontal trajectory, hitting at a reduced velocity around 200 ft/sec or so. This possibility was expected to be proven untenable and therefore likely wouldn’t happen.

Results:

Embarrassingly enough, the modeling predicted I would be wrong on every single account!

A fragment could have made it to Tague

The initial exit velocity would be more than twice the 400 ft/sec I was thinking

The final velocity would be even less than half the 200 ft/sec I was thinking

The angle at striking would be opposite, nearly vertical, instead of more horizontal like I thought

The curb strike likely presented a shearing force rather than the head-on compression force I expected

Talk about being wrong!

A crude curb-strike simulation was subsequently conducted to look at this because the predictions seemed so unusual.

Overall, the modeling and simulation indicated the scenario looked to be a real possibility, with a limo exiting fragment able to reach the curb by Tague and cause a spray of surface mortar that could hit him.

It is still possible the model is not accurate enough, or the fresh mark was not related to a bullet at all, but the modeling came up with numbers that were largely predictive of observations that others subsequently measured on such fragments, like what Lucian Haag found for fragment exit velocities in his simulated skull test shots experiments, and Carcano fragment ballistic coefficients.

Two options for base case trajectories for the incident are depicted on the attached graphs. [I couldn't copy-paste them here. -- T.G.]

Based on the modeling and simulation, I now favor that a rogue fragment from the head shot caused the Tague incident.

I will try to make a link to a summary with more details for those interested in ballistics, etc.

edit: the study details can be found here:

https://drive.google.com/.../1CcnCy17Hwqqw3zBCK7l.../view...

2
BD--

I plan a post on the Connally slug, and the Walker slug in the future.

In both case, the official evidence and the WC narrative stretches credulity.

Every hospital employee knows that all gunshots must be reported to police, and all evidence, such as bullets, retained. A serious matter.

Yet somehow a bullet that struck the Governor of the State of Texas (and that made a clean small, round hole in his pant leg upon entry, indication quite a bit of force) ends up...where? On the floor outside of the Trauma Room 2?

Except O.P. Wright, a former police chief and then hospital administrator, said the bullet he received from Tomlinson was a pointy-head bullet?

There are equally confounding circumstances regarding the Walker bullet.

The WC and FBI were pursuing the LNT narrative, per instructions of LBJ, who did not want to nuke it out with Moscow.
3


Harris's videos impressed me 18 years ago...Especially one subject I can't remember now...Maybe the Magic Bullet...Maybe Connally's bullet that dropped on the floor and the nurse picked up...Yeah, I think that was it...The tracing of that bullet that was taken to evidence and disappeared...A whole bullet...
4
Going back to my early days on the Prodigy service we were divided into Loons and Nutters. I wasn't bothered to be called a Nutter and I don't recall any push back for the term Loon. Everyone knew what the terms meant and no one seemed to take offense.
5
I think the acronyms "CT" or "CT'er" and "LNT" or "LNT'er" are equally valid and useful, in the context of the JFKA.

The first official investigation into the JFKA, the WC, came down on the LNT-side, while the second official investigation, the HSCA-1979, came down on the CT side.

Caveat emptor, and draw your own conclusions. They will be as good as anyone else's. 
6
TN-

If Weitzman did not see an ID, I stand corrected. I will have to check his testimony.

Still, the odds of Powell being the man who flashed Secret Service credentials on the GK are rather low. Powell was carrying a camera too, in those days usually rather bulky affairs.

Powell's ID looked nothing like Secret Service ID.



7
He used to have his own forum. I wasn't on it for long before he banned me..

That doesn't surprise me at all. If I remember right, he wouldn't let anybody comment on his YouTube channel. I found his videos to be great cures for insomnia.
8
Grok is my go-to for Ai. I do like my smartphone but the vast majority of my internet time is spent on my laptops. I don't bundle anything. My internet and mobile are from the same provider but they don't offer a bundle for the two. I haven't had subscription TV for 21 years now. My TV got turned on a month ago after being off for 3 years. I have movies on thumb drives that the grandkids watch. They were watching YouTube on it before we shut it down 3 years ago. I also have Amazon Prime but I 've only watched a half dozen movies from it in the last 4 years and that is on my laptops. I watch a lot of documentaries and such on YouTube. The smartphone does make my life easier. It's convenient.

My Spectrum service includes a lot of the popular streaming services at no extra charge although they come with ads. If you want to go ad free you have to pay extra for them. I haven't crunched the numbers to determine if it would be cheaper to drop Spectrum as my TV provider and just subscribe to a streaming service for all my TV. I don't mind the ads because there aren't as many as there are with network and cable channels. I'm  comfortable having everything in one big package and the price seems reasonable to me so why change.
9
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: The First Shot
« Last post by John Corbett on Today at 04:08:16 AM »

There is still the Tague problem however. It doesn’t seem to be plausible that a  Z313 fragment could fly over the windshield and drop down if it had enough velocity to haves chipped the curb. Maybe a lead fragment traveling at 200 ft/ sec  can chip off  a small particle of concrete from the curb?   IDK.

i agree it doesn't seem likely that a fragment from the head shot could have caused the concrete to chip, but without knowing the exit velocity of the fragments from the headshot and minimum velocity needed to chip the concrete, it's just a guess. I lean toward a ricochet from the first shot miss continuing down range and striking the curb.
10
Please take your meds, log off and touch grass.

Dear Matty,

Don't you know that oodles and gobs of evil, evil, evil CIA officers/agents were involved in the planning, the "patsy-ing," the planting of evidence, the shooting, the planting of more evidence, the getting-away, the altering of all of the photos, films, and X-rays, and the . . . gasp . . . continuing "cover -up"?

LOL!

-- Tom
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10