No, DPD Baker is just another witness in a large group of witnesses confirming that there never was an early missed shot. The eyewitnesses correlate where the first shot occurred by relating the limousines position to where they were standing. Motorcade 63 relates the first shot to Westbrook/ Calvery statements placing it between Z204 and Z212. The Chisms, Jean Newman, and Mary Woodward also place it in the same time frame.

Willis puts the first shot before z202.  You have to be careful in trying to use a witness to pinpoint a shot.  Calvery/Westbrook used the same language to describe the location - not of JFK but of the President’s car. They both said that the President’s car was almost directly in front of where they were standing.



(Westbrook: 22H679) Given the uncertainty of the word “almost” as well as the uncertainty of which part of the car would have to be directly in front of them for them to consider the car to be in front of them, it is not possible to use their testimony to pinpoint the position of JFK to within a range smaller than about a car length, which is 21 feet or 21 frames.

Willis did not pinpoint the shot but set a precise after-bracket for it that is made precise by his photo.

Given the approximate nature of that kind of estimate and correlation to the zfilm it does not exclude the possibility of a shot fitting with Phil Willis’ evidence of a first shot just before z202.

No, DPD Baker is just another witness in a large group of witnesses confirming that there never was an early missed shot. The eyewitnesses correlate where the first shot occurred by relating the limousines position to where they were standing. Motorcade 63 relates the first shot to Westbrook/ Calvery statements placing it between Z204 and Z212. The Chisms, Jean Newman, and Mary Woodward also place it in the same time frame.

TS-

You are entitled to your views.

But I am trying to stay on topic: Morley.

Even if the US is a plutocracy, does that excuse Morley dog-whistling "Mossad perped the JFKA" on the Tucker Carlson show, and posting pro-IRGC propaganda on "X"?

Or, in your view (and possibly Morley's), the fact that the US is plutocracy means we must support left-wing and Islamist (or Moscow and IRGC) narratives on the JFKA?

Either a tangential entry or a yawing bullet could produce an elongated entry wound. Since the medical team AT THE TIME would have had no reason to believe the bullet and struck someone or something before entering JBC's back, it is understandable why they would conclude the bullet made a tangential entry wound into JBC's back. That would indicate the bullet was traveling almost parallel to his back.

No. The wound showed that the bullet entered on a downward trajectory.  It was 1.5 cm in the longest dimension (the bullet is 3.0 cm long) and was drawn as an ellipse with its long axis in the vertical direction:

The problem with that is a bullet entering at that angle would have continued on and exited from the left side of his torso. The other possibility would be if the bullet made a tangential entry going in the opposite direction which would require the shot to have been fired from the south side of Elm St. In any case, the ER doctors were simply wrong in concluding that the elongated wound was caused by a tangential strike. It was caused by a yawing bullet. No other explanation fits the available evidence.

You are assuming that the bullet did not deflect.  But it must have imparted significant momentum to JBC in order for the bullet to have made such an impact sensation in JBC's back.  The only way that happens is if it changes direction suddenly.

Donald Trump is, at the very least, a KGB* asset.

*Today's SVR and FSB

Toxic narcissist Trump was first "spotted" for possible future development in 1980 by KGB agent Semyon Kislin at his "Joy-Lund" electronics store in Manhattan.

A few years later he was dropped-in-on at Trump Tower by the new Soviet Ambassador to the U.N., Yuri Dubinin. Dubinin and his daughter flattered the-you-know-what out of him. A year later he was seated next to Dubinin at an Estee Lauder luncheon, and a few months after that he was in Moscow, all-expenses-paid, "scouting for sites for Trump Tower Moscow."

Then he comes home and places a full-page anti-NATO ad in major newspapers.

Go figure.