Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1

This Niederhut guy is something else, eh? Apparently believes all the World Trade Center buildings were leveled by "controlled demolition" ? He should hash out his issues with members of his own forum over there, not here.
2
It couldn't have been rifle smoke on the GK because there was no rifle on the GK.

    "Rifle" Smoke?  Who specifically attached this alleged smoke to a "Rifle"?
3
It can look like anything you want it to be. Use your imagination.

Oh, wait. You already did.
4
It couldn't have been rifle smoke on the GK because there was no rifle on the GK.
5
Exactly. Almost nothing Oswald did during the roughly 45 minutes between the time he shot JFK and the time he shot Tippit was time stamped. That includes his encounter with Officer Baker in the lunchroom. We know he shot JFK at 12:30 because that is the time showing on the Hertz clock above the TSBD. The next accurate time stamp was when a citizen used Tippit's radio to report the shooting of Tippit. Everything else is an estimate and many of those estimates were not even made at the time of the event. They were made when people were asked about it later. For example, Earlene Roberts was asked what time Oswald showed up at the rooming house. Her answer was ABOUT 1:00. People aren't in the habit of time stamping mundane events and when they make estimates, they usually round the time. Who would ever say "about 12:57"? Without accurate time records, no one can say what was or was not possible.

Prediction: Conspiracy theorists will largely ignore this post. They don't like to deal with issues that challenge their preferred narrative.
6
Bobby Hargis’ testimony indicates that he was in that area about the time that the TSBD was finally sealed. From his testimony to the WC:

… so, I came back to the Texas School Book Depository. At that time it seemed like the activity was centered around the Texas School Book Depository, so, that is when I heard someone say, one of the sergeants or lieutenants, I don't know, "Don't let any- one out of the Texas School Book Depository," and so, I went to a gap that had not been filled, which was at the southwest corner. Mr. STERN. And you remained there until you were relieved? Mr. HARGIS. Yes.

I have drawn a yellow circle around the area that is the southwest corner of the TSBD. Isn’t this the area where the motorcycle cop in question was filmed?



   This overhead view makes it clear how close the Officer Harkness Check Point was to the railroad spur closest to the Elm St Extension. Just use the cars pictured to measure the distance between the Harkness Check Point and that railroad spur. Figure 17.5 feet per car. And this is made clear on that newly discovered Darnell Fim footage that pans from the Elm St Extension to that Harkness Check Point. And this Darnell Film snippet also shows the Elm St Extension to now be jammed with people. The time of this snippet being 12:38 PM. That "No Glove Cop" is not Officer Haygood. Haygood was already back at his motorcycle making his documented police radio transmission at 12:35 PM.
7
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Tippit Myth
« Last post by Bill Brown on Today at 12:45:49 PM »
"If you read the explanation of why there was not enough time for Oswald to have done all the things that the Warren Commission credited him with doing between the time he entered the bus near the Depository and shooting Tippit, you would conclude that all the witnesses in the case had assembled on the morning of November 22 to synchronize their watches and take a pledge to check them at crucial moments as the day's events unfolded.

The reality is that, like the spring-driven clocks in most people's houses in 1963, what would have been the crucial clocks and watches probably varied in the time they showed by several minutes."

Larry Sturdivan
(The JFK Myths, 2005, pg. 179)
8
Did James Simmons See Smoke from a Rifle on the Grassy Knoll?



Another one of Mark Lane's witnesses to support his theory that a gunman was firing from the grassy knoll was James Simmons: (page 40 of Rush to Judgment)

In filmed interviews, both James L. Simmons and Richard C. Dodd told me that they had seen smoke near the bushes and trees at the corner of the wooden fence. Simmons said the sound of the shots 'came from the left and in front of us, toward the wooden fence, and there was puff of smoke that came underneath the trees on the embankment.'

Here is what Simmons said in 1964 to the FBI:



Simmons said that "he thought he saw exhaust fumes of smoke near the embankment in front of the Texas School Book Depository," and that "it was his opinion the shots came from the direction of the Texas School Book Depository."


Now, here is what Simmons told Mark Lane in 1966:


LANE. What did you see and what did you hear?


SIMMONS. As the presidential limousine was rounding the curve on Elm Street, there was a loud explosion. At the time I didn't know what it was, but it sounded like a loud firecracker or a gun shot. Ann it sounded like it came form the left and in front of us towards the wooden fence. And there was a puff of smoke that came underneath of the trees on the embankment.


LANE. Where was the puff of smoke Mr. Simmons in relation to the wooden fence?


SIMMONS. It was right directly in front of the wooden fence....


LANE. After you heard the shots and saw the smoke, what did you do?


SIMMONS. I was talkin with Patrolman Foster at the time. And as soon as we heard the shots we ran around to the wooden fence. And when we got there there was no one there. But there was footprints in the mud around the fence, and there was footprints on the wooden two by four railing on the fence.


LANE. Were you questioned by Dallas Police that day?


SIMMONS. Yes, I was.


LANE. Did you give your name to the Dallas Police?


SIMMONS. Yes, I did.


LANE. Did you tell them what you just told me?


SIMMONS. Yes, I did.


LANE. Were you subsequently questioned by agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.


SIMMONS. About a month later I was questioned by the FBI.


LANE. Did you tell them what you told me and what you told the Dallas Police?


SIMMONS. Yes, I did.


So, Simmons changes the location of the smoke from "near the embankment in front of the depository" to "underneath the trees on the embankment." Lane doesn't ask him about the change in the location of the smoke, nor does he ask him about whether the smoke was "exhaust fumes."


And Lane doesn't dare tell his readers that Simmons initially thought the shots came from the Texas School Book Depository. In fact, Lane doesn't tell his readers anything about what Simmons said in 1964, although he does provide a footnote to Simmons' statement -- so we know that Lane knew about it.

9
George Kisevalter and Igor Danchenko

Yuri Nosenko was a false defector-in-place in Geneva in June 1962 — sent there to discredit what recent true defector Anatoliy Golitsyn was known by the KGB to be telling the CIA, and he was a false (or perhaps rogue) physical defector to the U.S. in 1964 — two months after the assassination of President Kennedy by Lee Harvey Oswald, a self-described Marxist who had lived in the USSR for two-and-a-half years. (Nosenko claimed that he’d read the KGB file on Oswald four times — twice before and twice after the assassination — and therefore knew for a fact that the KGB had absolutely nothing to do with the former Marine sharpshooter and U-2 radar operator in The Worker’s Paradise.)

When, in June 1962, English-speaking Major Lt. Col. Captain Nosenko, who was ostensibly in Geneva to provide security to a Soviet arms control delegation and “desperately needed $250 worth of Swiss francs,” defected-in-place to CIA’s Tennent H. Bagley, Russian-speaking George Kisevalter — already legendary within the Agency for having handled destined-to-be-uncovered-and-executed Pyotr Popov and Oleg Penkovsky — was brought in from Washington to help the Russian-understanding Bagley interview him.

When Nosenko returned to Moscow a couple of weeks later with the Soviet negotiators, it was Kisevalter’s task to transcribe the tapes from the four meetings that he and Bagley had had with Nosenko plus the first one that Bagley had with him one-on-one.

In 1965, Bagley asked a trusted defector, KGB Major Pyotr Deriabin, to listen to the tapes and correct any errors in Kisevalter’s transcriptions.

Deriabin found one-hundred-and-fifty of ‘em.


Fast-forward thirteen years:

Nosenko-defending John L. Hart told the HSCA in 1978 that these 150 mistakes proved that Nosenko had been grossly misunderstood by his debriefers.

Which somehow reminds me of how probable KGB agent Igor Danchenko fed Christopher Steele unfalsifiable “intel” for his opposition research dossier on Donald Trump.
10
Your horrid photo analysis continues unabated, I see?
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10