Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Donald Trump is, at the very least, a KGB* asset.

*Today's SVR and FSB

He was first "spotted" for possible future development in 1980 by KGB agent Semyon Kislin at his "Joy-Lund" electronics store in Manhattan.

A few years later he was dropped-in-on at Trump Tower by the new Soviet Ambassador to the U.N., Yuri Dubinin. Dubinin and his daughter flattered the-you-know-what out of him. A year later he was seated next to Dubinin at an Estee Lauder luncheon, and a few months after that he was in Moscow, all-expenses-paid, "scouting for sites for Trump Tower Moscow."

Then he comes home and places a full-page anti-NATO ad in major newspapers.

Go figure.

Yup, He threw China under the bus, to hear Him tell it, Russia's involvement was merely a footnote.

Quote
https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-goes-on-absolutely-bonkers-rant-about-burn-bags-demands-criminal-probe/
Trump Goes On Absolutely Bonkers Rant About ‘Burn Bags,’ Demands Criminal Probe
Kathryn Wilkens
Jul 16th, 2026,

....Focusing on China’s alleged interference in the 2020 election, Trump said on Thursday, “Recently, we found significant numbers of burn bags, information, and this is a group of bags that were used to destroy information given by President Barack Hussein Obama to be burned.”

He continued:

It was supposed to be burned. These bags were supposed to be, at a different level by different people, incinerated and checked, but it never happened. Maybe we got lucky. We believe this was not done on purpose, but rather through gross incompetence of the people that were supposed to burn the bags. But the findings are stunning. Today, I’m asking the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Department of Justice, the FBI, and the CIA to investigate how and why such crucial information was hidden, to fire those involved in the cover-up, and to file criminal charges, if appropiate, against these people.
2
Did the HSCA determine the hole in the windshield resulted from a strike on the interior side of the windshield?

There was no through-and-through hole in the windshield.
3
President Trump is likely best a discussion for the General Discussion And Debate (Any Topic) section of this forum.

In general, I do not admire criminals, but I do admire successful people and groups in positive endeavors.

WTF ?:

Quote
https://www.politifact.com/article/2020/sep/30/context-donald-trumps-stand-back-and-stand-debate-/
PolitiFact | In context: Donald Trump's 'stand back and stand by ...
On the debate stage for the first time with Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden, President Donald Trump stopped short of condemning white supremacists, telling the far-right Proud Boys...

Quote
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enrique_Tarrio
.... he was the chairman of the Proud Boys, a neo-fascist organization that promotes and engages in political violence in the United States. Along with three other Proud Boys leaders, Tarrio was convicted in May 2023 of seditious conspiracy for his role in the 2021 United States Capitol attack. In September 2023, Tarrio was sentenced to 22 years in prison, before being pardoned by U.S. president Donald Trump following his return to office on January 20, 2025....

Quote
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stewart_Rhodes
.... a convicted seditionist, and the founder of the Oath Keepers, an American far-right anti-government militia.[1][2] In November 2022, he was convicted of seditious conspiracy and evidence tampering related to his participation in the January 6 United States Capitol attack culminating at the main campus of the United States Capitol complex. On May 23, 2023, he was sentenced to 18 years in prison before having his sentence commuted to time served by President Donald Trump following his return to office on January 20, 2025.[3][4] ...


4
President Trump is likely best a discussion for the General Discussion And Debate (Any Topic) section of this forum.

In general, I do not admire criminals, but I do admire successful people and groups in positive endeavors.

You and John posted your preference for Rubio to succeed Trump in 2028, days ago, in this very forum. From then on, you've attempted the bait and switch
to avoid having to defend the following absurdities.

Quote
https://intelligencecommunitynews.com/senate-intel-committee-releases-final-volume-of-russian-election-interference-report/
On August 18, U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Acting Chairman Marco Rubio (R-FL) and Vice Chairman Mark Warner (D-VA) released the fifth and final volume of the Committee’s bipartisan Russia investigation titled, “Volume 5: Counterintelligence Threats and Vulnerabilities,” which examines Russia’s attempts to gain influence in the American political system during the 2016 elections.

The Committee’s investigation totaled more than three years of investigative activity, more than 200 witness interviews, and more than a million pages of reviewed documents. All five volumes total more than 1300 pages.

You can read “Volume 5: Counterintelligence Threats and Vulnerabilities” here.

Read the Senate Intelligence Committee’s previous reports:...

IOW, "TG", there is little chance of anything reasonable or coherent coming from either of them.

TG-

Do you dislike the Donks and the Phants equally?

On any given day...

Lately, with the Mamdani-stan wing of the D-Party becoming ascendant...maybe 60/40 favor for the GOP.

But, in general it is a race to the bottom between these two parties....

I like Marco Rubio.

I like Rubio too and if he's the GOP nominee for POTUS in 2028, I will gladly vote for him. I think the nomination is J. D. Vance's to lose. A lot can happen between now and the early primaries and caucuses in 2028, but I expect Vance to be the nominee. Rubio would make a great #2.

There are no Democrats who I would even consider voting for in 2028. The Democrat Party has become so toxic with their embracing of the Marxist agenda that I won't consider anybody who is willing to put a D next to their name. I like John Fetterman but he isn't going to be on the national ticket and I live in the neighboring state of Ohio so I can't vote for him anyway. If he is going to remain in the Senate, he will have to switch parties because he will be primaried by the Democrats. Arlen Specter made that move in the oppositive direction. There is one other Democrat I like because he shows some common sense and the courage to call out the far left but I can't imagine him gaining any traction even if he does choose to run. That would be Stephen A. Smith who is a long shot to run and end even longer shot to win the nomination. The Commies are now controlling the primary process in the Democrat Party and not just on the coasts. I hope the Dems nominate AOC. It might be enough to make me believe there is a God.
5
MTG--

I think you misunderstood my comment.

I have reasonable doubts about narratives of the JFKA that assert there was/is no hole in the limo windshield.

Did you see my other post?

Was the windshield destroyed or not? Or is it in the National Archives?

And did the HSCA determine the hole in the windshield resulted from a strike on the interior side of the windshield?
6
President Trump is likely best a discussion for the General Discussion And Debate (Any Topic) section of this forum.

In general, I do not admire criminals, but I do admire successful people and groups in positive endeavors.
7
TG-

I do not know the answer why some ethnic groups seem to excel in various endeavors. The Jews have been successful wherever they go, for millennia.

Today, in the US, Indian-Americans and Han Chinese seem to be supplanting Jews in much of the sciences.

Of course, Northern Europeans were so successful they ruled the world, and only voluntarily gave up control of much of the planet. Northern Europeans made themselves excellent places to live (perhaps endangered now by in-migration).

The Japanese have created on their islands likely the best place to live, of any large nation.

Han Chinese were successful everywhere they migrated to, often arousing local resentments, as in Indonesia, and to a much lesser extent, in Thailand.

I read that the Jains, a tiny sliver of the Indian population, are much over-represented by the usual measures of income, wealth, professional and business success. They are a fascinating people.

Israel's economy is booming now, even as they have to devote large resources to national security.

On the other hand, Nigeria can literally strike oil, hit the jackpot, have peaceful neighbors, and then become mired in endless torpor and violence.

I do not know why this happens. Even to discuss this is politically incorrect.

I do not expect equal results from different groups.

Do you admire people who, regardless of ethnicity and/or religion, excel at criminality?

Do you admire, for example, The Traitorous Orange Turd?
8
TG-

I do not know the answer why some ethnic groups seem to excel in various endeavors. The Jews have been successful wherever they go, for millennia.

Today, in the US, Indian-Americans and Han Chinese seem to be supplanting Jews in much of the sciences.

Of course, Northern Europeans were so successful they ruled the world, and only voluntarily gave up control of much of the planet. Northern Europeans made themselves excellent places to live (perhaps endangered now by in-migration).

The Japanese have created on their islands likely the best place to live, of any large nation.

Han Chinese were successful everywhere they migrated to, often arousing local resentments, as in Indonesia, and to a much lesser extent, in Thailand.

I read that the Jains, a tiny sliver of the Indian population, are much over-represented by the usual measures of income, wealth, professional and business success. They are a fascinating people.

Israel's economy is booming now, even as they have to devote large resources to national security.

On the other hand, Nigeria can literally strike oil, hit the jackpot, have peaceful neighbors, and then become mired in endless torpor and violence.

I do not know why this happens. Even to discuss this is politically incorrect.

I do not expect equal results from different groups.




9
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: The First Shot
« Last post by Tom Graves on Today at 02:01:16 AM »
I agree Oswald is moving in the window in the Hughes film. The image is too blurry to draw any conclusion as to how he is moving and it gives us no indication as to when he fired the first shot.

Why do you prefer, as an indication of when the first shot occurred, Zapruder's jiggling of his camera to Elsie Dorman's finger's slipping off the "filming now" button at approximately "Z-124" and around Z-222, too?

In 2008, Dale Myers wrote:

"Elsie Dorman told Sixth Floor Museum curator Gary Mack in the early 1980’s that she remembered that the first shot was very loud, sounded like it came from behind her (i.e., from inside the building), and that she stopped filming just after the first shot. Elsie Dorman, who died in 1983, had filmed the motorcade from a fourth-floor window of the Depository. [Max] Holland and [Kenneth] Scearce cite my work on the synchronization of amateur films of the Kennedy motorcade (Epipolar Geometric Analysis of Amateur Films Related to Acoustics Evidence in the John F. Kennedy Assassination) as supportive of their theory [that Oswald's first, missing-everything, shot was fired just before Zapruder resumed filming], noting that Dorman stopped her camera three times – first at a point 0.12 seconds before Zapruder began [sic; resumed] filming the limousine (i.e., Z133); a second time at the equivalent of Z228, just after the second shot; and a third and final time at the equivalent of Z411, about five seconds after the last shot."
10
[...]

Dear Tom "A Beautiful Mind" Skully,

Do you find it interesting that in April of 1964, probable KGB "mole" Bruce Solie (father-figure-requiring James Angleton's confidant, mentor, and mole-hunting superior) tried to talk W. David Slawson into letting Yuri "The KGB Had Nothing To Do With Oswald In The USSR" Nosenko testify to the Warren Commission even though CIA Counterintelligence and the Soviet Russia Division were convinced he'd been a false-defector-in-place in Geneva in June 1962, sent to the CIA there to protect a mole or two or three from being uncovered by recent true defector Anatoly Golitsyn's revelations?

Do you find it interesting that KGB Major Aleksey Kulak (J. Edgar Hoover's shielded-from-CIA FEDORA at the FBI's NYC field office) had to lamely retract his two specific "confirmations" of Nosenko's bonafide-ness when Nosenko admitted during interrogations to having lied about those two things (i.e., his now being a "Lieutenant Colonel" and his having received a "return to Moscow immediately" telegram in Geneva in February 1964)?

Do you find it interesting that Solie "cleared" Nosenko in October 1968 via a bogus polygraph exam and a specious report?

Do you find it interesting that Solie hid CIA documents from the Church Committee and the HSCA?

-- Tom
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10