Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: The Brown Paper Bag
« Last post by Martin Weidmann on Today at 05:50:08 PM »
Quote from: John Mytton on Today at 11:00:07 AM
I can't blame him, you conspiracy Kooks theorists are psychotic and have badgered Frazier continually, as you say "for the next 60 years", he had no choice, otherwise you people would have made his life HELL!

JohnM

That's not the impression I got from him. Frazier is more than helpful to talk to and deal with people who do not blindly believe the WC's allegations.
Not so much with LN nuts.
2
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: The Brown Paper Bag
« Last post by Dan O'meara on Today at 05:48:24 PM »
The issue is not the length of the paper bag - it's the length of the object in the bag.
Both Randall and Frazier report Oswald carrying the package in incredibly specific ways that, if taken at face value, make it impossible for the object in the paper bag to be a rifle, disassembled or not.
Frazier has the object cupped in Oswald's hand and held under his armpit.
Randall seems to describe Oswald carrying the object down by his side, almost touching the ground.
It doesn't matter what guesses Frazier and Randall made about the length of the package.
What matters is the way they describe the object being held as this sets a limit on how long the object can be.
For a man of Oswald's physical stature, it is physically impossible for him to be carrying a 34.8 inch disassembled rifle in the ways described by Frazier and Randall.
At a guess, the object must be somewhere between 24 - 28 inches in order to be carried in the ways Frazier and Randall describe.
If not a rifle, what can this object possibly be, as it is clearly not Oswald's lunch bag?






3
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Who Were the Two Men Heading *Down* the Stairs at NLT 12:50?
« Last post by Royell Storing on Today at 05:34:39 PM »
Quote from: Mitch Todd on March 08, 2026, 01:28:01 AM
RS:  I am talking about the dirt road portion of the Elm St Extension.

So why did you bring up the limo turn and traffic signal in the Wegman film?

there are NO BOLLARDS between Officer Harkness and this alleged motorcycle cop.

Yes there are! Not only can you see many of them in the Darnell film, others are made obvious when the motorcycle cop walks behind them.

Here, bollards are outlined in red. Note that one is in Harkness' shadow:


Here, "B" marks where the line of bollards is. You can see that two of them are silhouetted by the MC as he walks behind them:


Here he is a half step later:


   We are NOW being told that the destination of this motorcycle cop is the TSBD Houston St loading dock. Why would he walk over there vs riding his motorcycle over there and securing the TSBD dock much quicker? Answer?  This alleged motorcycle cop does Not have a motorcycle. He never did.
4
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Podcast On Tippit
« Last post by Martin Weidmann on Today at 05:33:03 PM »
Duplicate
5
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Podcast On Tippit
« Last post by Martin Weidmann on Today at 05:31:26 PM »
Quote from: John Mytton on Today at 05:13:15 PM


JohnM

As I said, you don't understand what I mean with "conclusive evidence"!

I have never used the term "absolute, 100% certainty". As per usual you are jumping to a completely wrong conclusion.

But feel free to keep on google searches to find stuff like this to fit what you have misrepresented I allegedly said but never really did.

Who knows you might even find something to help you claim that the word "conclusive" is the same as "100% certainty".   Thumb1:
6
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Podcast On Tippit
« Last post by Martin Weidmann on Today at 05:28:21 PM »
Quote from: John Mytton on Today at 05:11:46 PM
Wow, another wall of text of mainly self serving guesses!

But one thing that's new is you're saying that the jacket found under the car was probably put under the car by the killer, so how do most of the witnesses, who saw the killer and say the jacket was a light coloured grey or beige suddenly becomes a white jacket? WOW!

BTW I like your story of how Oswald's jacket was the same type and style as the one seen being held by the Policeman in the video and then back at headquarters some dishonest Policeman who had access to the evidence room and was aware of all the collected evidence, somehow mysteriously swaps Oswald's jacket for the one in evidence, what are the chances that the Jackets are almost the same colour, same style and appear to be the same size. Let me tell you the chances are not good and it's just another product of a CT's wet dream. Do the math, indeed!

The more you try to create a narrative for your massive conspiracy, the more unwieldly, illogical and frankly ridiculous it becomes.

JohnM

But one thing that's new is you're saying that the jacket found under the car was probably put under the car by the killer,

It is a plausible assumption.

so how do most of the witnesses, who saw the killer and say the jacket was a light coloured grey or beige suddenly becomes a white jacket? WOW!

Well, as you always claim, sunlight can cause the color to be different because of shade and depending from where you look and how far away you are.

Btw which witnesses said the jacket was light colored grey or beige?

BTW I like your story of how Oswald's jacket was the same type and style as the one seen being held by the Policeman in the video

Was it? I didn't say it was the same type and style. That's just your imagination filling in the blanks in a biased manner as per usual.
But it certainly looked similar but I've only seen a photo of the back side and there is no way to make the determination you want to make but can not support!

what are the chances that the Jackets are almost the same colour, same style and appear to be the same size.

Were they? Did you examine both jackets or are you just making this stuff up?

The more you try to create a narrative for your massive conspiracy, the more unwieldly, illogical and frankly ridiculous it becomes.

My massive conspiracy? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
7
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: That Is Not Officer Haygood = Conspiracy! Prove Me Wrong Challenge
« Last post by Royell Storing on Today at 05:26:37 PM »
Quote from: Charles Collins on March 11, 2024, 12:39:17 PM
Bobby Hargis’ testimony indicates that he was in that area about the time that the TSBD was finally sealed. From his testimony to the WC:

… so, I came back to the Texas School Book Depository. At that time it seemed like the activity was centered around the Texas School Book Depository, so, that is when I heard someone say, one of the sergeants or lieutenants, I don't know, "Don't let any- one out of the Texas School Book Depository," and so, I went to a gap that had not been filled, which was at the southwest corner. Mr. STERN. And you remained there until you were relieved? Mr. HARGIS. Yes.

I have drawn a yellow circle around the area that is the southwest corner of the TSBD. Isn’t this the area where the motorcycle cop in question was filmed?



        The Red Outlined Officer Haygood Route has Suddenly been changed. The NEW CLAIM is that Haygood's destination was the TSBD Houston St loading dock. That dock would be on the extreme upper (L) of this photo. Why would Haygood choose to WALK All the way over to this loading dock, when he could ride his motorcycle over there and secure this area much quicker?  Answer = That Ain't Haygood. This alleged motorcycle cop does Not have a motorcycle. 
8
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Podcast On Tippit
« Last post by Martin Weidmann on Today at 05:19:28 PM »
Duplicate
9
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Podcast On Tippit
« Last post by Martin Weidmann on Today at 05:18:54 PM »
Quote from: John Corbett on Today at 04:20:59 PM
AHA!!! So you finally acknowledge that eyewitness testimony is less than reliable in establishing facts. We are making progress here.

What are you babbling about. I have always said that eyewitness testimony is the least reliable form of evidence.
But that doesn't mean that all eyewitnesses are always wrong.

10
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Podcast On Tippit
« Last post by John Mytton on Today at 05:13:15 PM »
Quote from: Martin Weidmann on Today at 04:41:09 PM
So, again, let me get this straight, without you having any legal expertise you feel that you can refute legal claims and school people on the law and legal standards?.

I just gave you an example of when you foolishly kept asking for "conclusive evidence" and claimed it was required to arrive at "Beyond all reasonable doubt"

You simply don't understand that "conclusive evidence" means that the evidence is authenticated. Once again you are in way over your head. Not surprising though, as you deny having any legal knowledge at all.  :D



JohnM
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10