Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Here is a rough 3D Sketchup drawing of the position of the two men from the front and the side showing the location of the TSBD:



Here is the model built on the Trask map of DP:



You will have to explain why you think JBC's front is facing the SN.



Here is a rough 3D Sketchup drawing of the position of the two men from the front and the side showing the location of the TSBD:



Here is the model built on the Trask map of DP:



You will have to explain why you think JBC's front is facing the SN.
Well, at least you tried. Finally.

You don't have JBC's shoulders turned even close to how they were at Z271. The middle sketch approximates Zapruder's perspective but in reality, Zapruder was still slightly ahead of the limo at Z271. From Zapruder's position, JBC's shoulders were rotated clockwise away from Zapruder. You have his shoulders rotated counterclockwise from square to Zapruder. You have his head rotated more than his shoulders were turned. The only person I ever saw able to do that was Linda Blair in The Exorcist. Unpossessed people can't do that. JBC's head turn is close enough to being accurate but you aren't showing his shoulders turned nearly enough. You would need to turn his shoulders a good 30 degrees clockwise to even be in the ballpark.

At the very least, a line through JBC's shoulders were parallel to the sides of the car. Oswald was firing from a position to the right rear of the limo. He would have no angle to shoot JBC anywhere in his back, even if we give you the benefit of the doubt on all estimates of JBC's shoulder turn. Oswald would have seen the front of JBC's torso. Not the back. You can't make this work, no matter how hard you try.
2
The FRONT of JBC's torso. That is what is exposed to Oswald. He could have hit the outside of JBC's right arm with a grazing shot. No way to enter anywhere on JBC's back. Why do you keep lying to yourself by telling yourself that could have happened.
Here is a rough 3D Sketchup drawing of the position of the two men from the front and the side showing the location of the TSBD:



Here is the model built on the Trask map of DP:



You will have to explain why you think JBC's front is facing the SN.


3
You do realized that at z271 JBC's right side is "facing" toward the TSBD/Oswald.

Yes it is which makes a shot into his back impossible at that frame.
Quote
I hope you realize that the right armpit is on the right side and that with his right arm up and in front of his chest the right armpit is exposed to a shot from the direction of the TSBD/Oswald.
The front of his right armpit is exposed to Oswald. That's not where the bullet entered. The bullet entered at the rear near his right armpit. That is turned away from Oswald.
Quote
 
The right scapula is not "facing" the TSBD/Oswald although the right edge of it is exposed to a shot from that direction. It is "facing" the grassy area between Elm and Main.  In any event, he was not hit in the scapula.
When's the last time you had your eyes checked?
Quote

The back of his armpit is turned toward the grassy area between Elm and Main.
I am not sure what you mean by the direction the back of his armpit is facing.  The back of his armpit is a particular location.

So now you want to quibble about semantics. OK. I can play that game. The back of his right armpit is EXPOSED to the grassy area between Elm and Main. It is not even close to being exposed to Oswald's gun. At Z271 JFK was leaning hard left from the position he was in at the time he was shot. That would mean any shot by Oswald directed at JBC would come over JFK's right shoulder. There's no way a bullet on that trajectory is going to enter his back near his armpit.
Quote
 
It doesn't face anywhere. What matters is whether the back of his armpit was exposed to a shot from Oswald's rifle.
It doesn't. Not even close. JBC's torso would have to rotate at least 90 degrees counter clockwise to make an entry in his back near his armpit possible.
Quote
 
Not only was the back of his armpit exposed = the entire armpit was exposed.
Both sides of that equation are ludicrous.
Quote
 
If you think it wasn't, what on earth could have blocked it?
The FRONT of JBC's torso. That is what is exposed to Oswald. He could have hit the outside of JBC's right arm with a grazing shot. No way to enter anywhere on JBC's back. Why do you keep lying to yourself by telling yourself that could have happened.
Quote
I have given you the diagram showing the exit location. 
The exit location has never been in dispute. It is how an entrance wound in the BACK of JBC's could have been made by a shot from the sniper's next at Z271. That is the impossibility.
Quote
What more do you need?  It shows the bullet coming from the TSBD/Oswald direction. It shows the direction of the shoulders. It shows the location of the entrance and exit wounds. It shows the location of the forearm in relation to the exit wound.
I don't know which diagram you are referring to. The one that looks like an abstract art painting or the earlier one in which you have JBC rotated 90 degrees counter clockwise from his actual position at Z271 and even then you needed a magical deflection of the shot to have it come out the right side of JBC's chest.

4
First you claim Hoover was clueless about the details of the assassination.
Have you listened to his taped conversations with LBJ? Hoover was clueless.
Quote

Then came the excuse "they" had enough evidence gathered by 11/25.
"They" were the DPD. They did turn over the investigation to the FBI but that doesn't mean it made it up the ladder to Hoover. His conversations with LBJ indicated he didn't have a grasp of some of the most basic facts.
Quote

You went on to claim the memo is often quoted out of context by CTs (whatever that means) - then YOU quote the memo out of context.  It is Hoover to Johnson, if you can't realize that, you're either naive or simply choose to be ignorant. You're a smart guy, so I would suggest the latter.  Nobody said anything about marching orders to a WC that doesn't exist yet.
The memo was from Katzenbach to Moyers. What the hell does that have to do with the conversations between Hoover and LBJ?
Quote

 Thumb1: ...omt, statements off the top of your head, followed up with such lame excuses to cover, are not a good litmus test for your credibility.
Neither are your opinions.
5
You tell me I have an odd concept of human anatomy and then make a statement as ridiculous as that. Here is Z271.
https://assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z271.jpg
You do realize that at z271 JBC's right side is "facing" toward the TSBD/Oswald.  I hope you realize that the right armpit is on the right side and that with his right arm up and in front of his chest the right armpit is exposed to a shot from the direction of the TSBD/Oswald.  The right scapula is not "facing" the TSBD/Oswald although the right edge of it is exposed to a shot from that direction. It is "facing" the grassy area between Elm and Main.  In any event, he was not hit in the scapula.
Quote
The back of his armpit is turned toward the grassy area between Elm and Main.
I am not sure what you mean by the direction the back of his armpit is facing.  The back of his armpit is a particular location.  It doesn't face anywhere. What matters is whether the back of his armpit was exposed to a shot from Oswald's rifle.  Not only was the back of his armpit exposed = the entire armpit was exposed.  If you think it wasn't, what on earth could have blocked it?

Quote
It would require the most magical of all magic bullets for a shot fired from the sniper's nest to enter the back of his right armpit and exit under his right nipple. Your continued refusal to even attempt to diagram such a shot is tacit admission of that fact.You're bonkers.
I have given you the diagram showing the exit location.  What more do you need?  It shows the bullet coming from the TSBD/Oswald direction. It shows the direction of the shoulders. It shows the location of the entrance and exit wounds. It shows the location of the forearm in relation to the exit wound.
6
He was getting most of his information directly from Hoover and it is clear from their recorded conversations that Hoover was completely clueless about the details of the assassination.

First you claim Hoover was clueless about the details of the assassination.

The Katzenbach memo is usually quoted out of context. If one reads the entire memo, he is not asking the WC to engage in a cover up. By the time he wrote that, there was already enough evidence gathered that there was no doubt Oswald was the assassin and the WC would come to that conclusion.

Then came the excuse "they" had enough evidence gathered by 11/25.

Maybe he should have written something like:
"It is important that all of the facts surrounding President Kennedy’s Assassination be made public in a way which will satisfy people in the United States and abroad that all the facts have been told and that a statement to this effect be made now."

Oh, wait. He did.

Also, the memo was not made to the WC. It was sent to Bill Moyers. The memo was not the WC's marching orders as many CTs would have us believe.Your reservations are not a litmus test for the credibility of the WC's findings.

You went on to claim the memo is often quoted out of context by CTs (whatever that means) - then YOU quote the memo out of context.  It is Hoover to Johnson, if you can't realize that, you're either naive or simply choose to be ignorant. You're a smart guy, so I would suggest the latter.  Nobody said anything about marching orders to a WC that doesn't exist yet.

 Thumb1: ...omt, statements off the top of your head, followed up with such lame excuses to cover, are not a good litmus test for your credibility.
7
I have reasonable doubts [...]

Fixed it for you.
8
You seem to have an odd concept of human anatomy.

The direction his face was facing is not material. What matters is that the back of the right armpit was "facing" Oswald at z271.
You tell me I have an odd concept of human anatomy and then make a statement as ridiculous as that. Here is Z271.
https://assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z271.jpg
The back of his armpit is turned toward the grassy area between Elm and Main. It would require the most magical of all magic bullets for a shot fired from the sniper's nest to enter the back of his right armpit and exit under his right nipple. Your continued refusal to even attempt to diagram such a shot is tacit admission of that fact.
Quote

His back was twisted.  The lowest part was "facing" the back seat and shoulders were aligned with the car direction and "facing" sideways.  The parts in between were in between those directions.
You're bonkers.
9

That means he was shot in the back. He got shot when his back was turned toward the exit wound in JFK's throat.Which wouldn't have been possible if he was facing JFK and Oswald as he was in Z271. I'm not surprised you have resisted illustrating that since it is not possible.
JBC said it felt like someone had punched him IN THE BACK with a doubled up fist. We know how much you rely on witnesses.

You seem to have an odd concept of human anatomy.

The direction his face was facing is not material. What matters is that the back of the right armpit was "facing" Oswald at z271.

His back was twisted.  The lowest part was "facing" the back seat and shoulders were aligned with the car direction and "facing" sideways.  The parts in between were in between those directions.
10
Nobody cares about your doubts.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10