Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1


What you are seeing there is the top ejecta that possessed the Occipital plug and shot out over the top of the seat back followed by the heavier brain matter that slopped down in to the back seat and was seen oozing out by the medical witnesses...

ALL IN THE DIRECTION OF A REAR-EXITING OCCIPITAL WOUND AS SEEN AT PARKLAND...

This wound was clearly described by Clint Hill as he looked down in to it in the back of JFK's head...Hill was then forced to lie and his story progressed towards what Carrico also changed his story to...
2

    When the woman's dress neckline appeared a couple of years ago John Cotter and some other members posted that it vindicated "The much maligned Brian Doyle"...

So you were correct about an irrelevant triviality. Congratulations. You must be so proud.
3

If you had any idea of what you were talking about you would see your own image shows that the splatter from the Occipital wound was laid down first (according to gunshot spatter science) and therefore proves what you are saying is wrong since it is still visible in your own image...

Sorry, you can't make that go away - which is why blood spatter forensics are so damning...

So tell us where and when you received your training in blood splatter science.
4
it is common practice for nutters to explain these discrepancies away with lame excuses.
 Thumb1: they just pile up. every one. every time.

What you call excuses is nothing more than applying critical thinking. Rather than assume every discrepancy is evidence of a conspiracy we ask ourselves whether there is a more mundane, less sinister explanation available. Invariably, there is one and it is the far more likely choice than the sinister one.
5
Yeah?  And here's the interesting fact, Mr. Doyle.

Any blood, brain or skull tissue on that portion of the backseat would have been completely wiped off and onto the dress that Mrs. Kennedy was wearing, as her skirt and lower portion of her top would have wiped from the seat onto her clothing.  All one has to do is look at her position as she rises from the seat and begins to crawl out of the seat.   Brian Doyle doesn't accept this as a fact, even with photographic proof that her upper body rubbed against that portion of the seat.

 

JFK BACK SEAT" border="0


If you had any idea of what you were talking about you would see your own image shows that the splatter from the Occipital wound was laid down first (according to gunshot spatter science) and therefore proves what you are saying is wrong since it is still visible in your own image...

Sorry, you can't make that go away - which is why blood spatter forensics are so damning...
6
It is a common practice by the CT community when they come across an anomaly or discrepancy to automatically assume it is evidence of a conspiracy instead asking themselves if there is a non-sinister explanation available. In just about every case there is as this incident reveals but the CTs thrive on assuming the most sinister explanation is the correct one.

it is common practice for nutters to explain these discrepancies away with lame excuses.
 Thumb1: they just pile up. every one. every time.
7
It is a common practice by the CT community when they come across an anomaly or discrepancy to automatically assume it is evidence of a conspiracy instead asking themselves if there is a non-sinister explanation available. In just about every case there is as this incident reveals but the CTs thrive on assuming the most sinister explanation is the correct one.
8

but your posting style brings out the worst in people, they might start accusing you of ‘puffery’.  ever heard that word, bird?  dang, this is turning into one of your block paragraphs so I better stop.  waiting for da ali g movie for I to see.


Perhaps I should copy your exemplary academic posting style...Meanwhile the posting style of the Prayer Man trolls goes uncriticized, which involves some of the worst organized corruption and dishonesty in internet history...Kamp then gets the endorsement of podcast idiots who are just looking to self-promote themselves with popular theories and researchers - evidence be damned (Ciphered Past, Robbie Robertson, Rob Clark, Len Osanic)...

Prayer Man is holding her purse up in front of her face and is looking down in to it...Her grand daughter Wanda sent me a photo of herself holding the purse as a child...

The internet allows dominating personalities to manipulate moderator favoritism and place friendships and clique over good evidence...They keep Mark Knight around to make sure they get away with it...Once disproven they keep their bad bans and don't apologize...It is much easier to just ban the people who out-argue you instead of admitting your were wrong...

9
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: The First Shot
« Last post by John Corbett on Today at 05:41:52 PM »
If you mean the shot that passed through JBC - the second shot - the bullet could have deflected off the back of his radius and fragmented. This impact could have deflected fragments up striking the windshield and frame and at least one of the fragments may have gone over the windshield striking the road near Tague.  Greer said he heard an impact sound on the second shot. Tague believed he was struck on the second shot because he heard one shot after he felt the strike on his cheek.

Let's add one more piece of ballistic gymnastics to your already goofy theory. JBC's was struck while holding his hat in his lap. For a bullet or even a fragment of a bullet to bounce off his wrist bone and fly over the front seat would be remarkable on its own. Then to have it fly over the windshield and strike the curb near Tague would take us into the realm of the bizarre.
10
……and I admitted my error thinking it was a dude taking pictures with a camera.  She’s holding something up to her face and it looked like a camera to me, but you and Duncan turned me around.  Imagine that?  takes a lot to change my shrinking brain.
but your posting style brings out the worst in people, they might start accusing you of ‘puffery’.  ever heard that word, bird?  dang, this is turning into one of your block paragraphs so I better stop.  waiting for da ali g movie for I to see.

and as for not posting anything of substance, all i can do for you there is quote the
Moody Blues, to wit:

“all the words you can say have been said
 it’s for you my tears I shed”
            ———————————“What Am I Doing Here?”
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10