Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
It doesn't seem to matter to the CTs who killed JFK. They make no effort to find out. Their whole game is denying to was Oswald.
Which Oswald? Harvey or Lee? The Bolton Ford Oswald, or the Lincoln Mercury Oswald? The Oswald who was with Marita Lorenz on a Caravan to Dallas, or the Oswald who worked with Judyth Baker to kill Castro with cancer? The Oswald Thornley knew, or the Oswald Titovets knew? Or the Oswald who took Russia-lessons given to him in Minsk by the late head of state of Belarus Stanislav Stanislavovich Shushkevich? Choose.  ;)
2
Marguerite Oswald who was with Marina at the Paines on the evening of 22.11.1963 could't stand, that Ruth Pain was lying to the press about her son and took Marina to the Adolphus with the help of TIME LIFE reporters.

3
That's all you need to know about Morley: In an April 8, 2025, reply on X   (Morley wrote)  "I think Oswald did kill Tippit." --- As far as I know Morley never asked John Armstrong if it was Harvey or Lee. :-)

4
The CTs never bother to consider how dumb it would be to place a shooter in front of the limo. Whether on the bridge or on the ground, he would be in full view of the spectators. The shooter would have to fire through an angled windshield which raises the possibility of deflection. The shot would have be threaded between the four occupants seated in front of JFK. Last but not least, what sense would it make to shoot JFK from the front if the plan was to pin the shooting on a lone gunman firing from behind.

CTs don't care if their arguments make sense. They just want to argue Oswald wasn't the assassin.
5
If you read the whole post you can see that it has been tested. And the results showed that the sound continued for several seconds as noticed by witnesses.   
It is called reverberation.

0.8 seconds is not several seconds.
6
It doesn't seem to matter to the CTs who killed JFK. They make no effort to find out. Their whole game is denying to was Oswald.
7
TG--

I think it is possible the KGB had a tangential role in the JFKA, and directly liquidated who knows how many people globally, and successor alphabet agencies are doing the same work.

Putin is the worst Russian leader since Stalin.

There, I said bad things about the KGB and Putin.

Now you can go back to "Iran! Iran! Iran! Iran!"
8
TG--

I think it is possible the KGB had a tangential role in the JFKA, and directly liquidated who knows how many people globally, and successor alphabet agencies are doing the same work.

Putin is the worst Russian leader since Stalin.

There, I said bad things about the KGB and Putin.

9
You ask a fascinating and timely question, not just about the JFKA, but so many public-political events.

Yes, like the KGB's, the GRU's, and the Saint Petersburg Professional Trolls', et als', installing pro-Putin Donald Trump as our "president" on 20 January 2017 with help from people like Roger Stone, Paul Manafort, and Julian Assange.

I find it interesting that you rarely say anything negative about the KGB (today's SVR and FSB).

Why is that?
10
TG--

You ask a fascinating and timely question, not just about the JFKA, but so many public-political events.

The ideology writes the agenda, and the agenda writes the narrative.

There is little doubt that Western leftists, and later leftist-Islamists, seized on the JFKA platform to advance their narratives, sometimes funded and boosted by Moscow or the IRGC, and who knows what NGOs or other intermediaries.

Lately, every large public event follows this pattern.

Odd historical fact: It was President LBJ himself who perped a snuff job on an investigation into LHO links to Havana and Moscow.



Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10