Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Enough to swing the election to a broken-down demented man named Biden.

Oodles and gobs?
2
[...]

Dear Comrade Griffith,

Are you a KGB agent?

You sound like a KGB agent.

-- Tom
3
The replies from WC defenders amount to this position:

"Never mind that no bullet fired from the sixth-floor window could have hit JFK's back at an upward angle and then passed through his neck at an upward angle. Never mind that this means no bullet from the sixth-floor window could have exited JFK's throat at a downward angle, much less at a 25-degree downward angle. Never mind that we therefore cannot get a bullet from JFK's throat to Connally's back in the first place, unless we're willing to rule out the sixth-floor window as the source of the shot. Just never mind these facts.

"We will continue to excuse ourselves from credibly dealing with these facts until you provide us with a non-SBT trajectory through Connally -- and the trajectory has to be one that we are willing to accept, but of course we will never accept any such trajectory because that would raise further doubt about the SBT.

"Moreover, we will continue to refuse to acknowledge the self-evident implications of the hard physical evidence of JFK's clothing, specifically, the fact that JFK's tie, including the tie knot, had no bullet hole through it, and that the nick on the tie knot was not on the edge of the knot but was visibly inward from the edge, because acknowledging the import of these facts would mean admitting that no bullet exited the throat. In the case of the SBT, we judge fact by theory, not the other way around."


We should keep in mind that the HSCA FPP's SBT does not merely require that JFK's head was tilted substantially forward but that his upper torso was tilted substantially forward as well, as Dr. Baden was nice enough to demonstrate.

As many here know, I am by no means the first researcher to note that the HSCA FPP's SBT is actually fatal to the SBT because no photo or footage shows JFK leaning so far forward during the SBT's timeframe. By acknowledging that the WC placed the back wound at least 2.5 inches too high and that the bullet hit and tunneled at an upward angle, the FPP actually destroyed the SBT. Dr. Wecht repeatedly made this point in his presentations on the SBT.

As I documented in a previous reply, both the NOVA and the Dale Myers SBT trajectory animations have JFK's upper torso virtually upright and have his head either upright (NOVA) or tilted only slightly forward (Myers), and they have the bullet traveling a downward path from the back wound to the throat wound.

And, of course, Lattimer's bogus SBT diagrams, which continue to be used by many WC apologists to this very day, show JFK sitting upright with his head upright, place the back wound visibly above the throat wound, show the bullet traveling downward through the neck, and show the bullet exiting the neck at a downward angle of at least 20 degrees.

No WC apologist has yet produced an SBT trajectory illustration that takes into account the forensic facts pointed out by the HSCA FPP regarding the back wound's upward trajectory, the upward trajectory through the neck, and the pronounced forward lean required to make that trajectory align with the sixth-floor window.

Indeed, even the NASA expert whom the HSCA hired to do their headshot and SBT trajectory analyses, Dr. Thomas Canning, simply ignored the HSCA FPP's diagram showing JFK's forward lean (7 HSCA 100, Figure 12) and instead showed JFK sitting virtually upright with his head virtually upright as well (2 HSCA 177, JFK Exhibit F-142). Incredibly, Canning also impossibly showed the back wound above the throat wound and showed the bullet exiting at a point visibly below JFK's throat wound.
4
Trump is not giving money to anyone.  I support his policies but he often thinks out loud with all sorts of ideas that never come to fruition.  Some of which are terrible.  I think it's entirely possible, however, that AI will create such efficiency and wealth that few may have to work in the near term future.  Not sure what the implications are from that but government policies that promote such efficiencies could result in rewarding citizens with such payments and services.  Maybe providing incentives to be good citizens including reducing crime and promoting art and education.  We are not forever limited to the capitalist vs socialist choices.  The opposition to data centers is futile.  There are legitimate concerns, but it is still coming for good or ill.  China and others are not going to hold back.  The US has no real choice.  Trump knows that.  It would not surprise me if the anti-data center campaign is even being funded by the Chinese.

I suspect that MAGATS who were dismissive of the dangers of Covid are equally naive about the threat that the development of "superintelligent AI" poses mankind.   
5
Israeli newspaper?  Would this mean Ruby was…………… the ‘M’ word ?

Oh Albert, do be careful with your findings, we don’t want to find you wandering aimlessly down Route 66 babbling something about Junior Jarman, do we ?  Zei gezunt.
6
I don't understand the government handing out money. If the government could make people richer by handing out money, why stop at $5000. Why not give everybody a million dollars? Yes, people will have more dollars to spend but the dollars they have will be worth a lot less. We should have learned that from the Covid stimulus checks. That triggered the sky high inflation during the Biden years. The same thing will happen if Trump goes through with this. I can almost understand the first round of stimulus checks because the economy needed a jump start but the next two rounds were overkill. I didn't get excited about the Covid stimulus checks because I knew they wouldn't increase my buying power. Neither will this if they go through with it. Government handouts are just a way of making people feel better without doing a thing to improve their lives. The only way handing out $5000 to everyone makes sense would be if they offset it by cutting government spending in other areas and we know they aren't going to do that, no matter which party is in power.

Trump is not giving money to anyone.  I support his policies but he often thinks out loud with all sorts of ideas that never come to fruition.  Some of which are terrible.  I think it's entirely possible, however, that AI will create such efficiency and wealth that few may have to work in the near term future.  Not sure what the implications are from that but government policies that promote such efficiencies could result in rewarding citizens with such payments and services.  Maybe providing incentives to be good citizens including reducing crime and promoting art and education.  We are not forever limited to the capitalist vs socialist choices.  The opposition to data centers is futile.  There are legitimate concerns, but it is still coming for good or ill.  China and others are not going to hold back.  The US has no real choice.  Trump knows that.  It would not surprise me if the anti-data center campaign is even being funded by the Chinese.   
7
The demoncrats were hot and heavy on illegal aliens for the same reason. Give them the right to vote and no Republican could win the electoral college. Now the demoncrats are trying to recruit Muslims into their fold.

I'm not exactly sure what the Dem calculation is on supporting open borders and trans issues.  Both are wildly unpopular and may have cost them the 2024 election.   The support of Gaza and Palestine including by anti-Semitic elements is also inexplicable.  Imagine some virtual signaling liberal explaining their woke cultural positions to Hamas and others such types.  I guess they don't understand that women and gays have no rights in that society.  They hate Trump more than terrorists, however.
8
Here's the actual first frame from the Darnell film, taken from my lossless Youtube download and not a lazy Youtube screenshot



and NO the Bell Film does NOT SHOW WIEGMAN RUNNING, it shows a walking camera man at the bottom but not him running.
This is taken from a high quality 1080p version without the watermark.



   DAN - The Newman Family was on the ground to the (L) of the above light pole. Wiegman filmed the Newman Family while also standing on the (L) of this same light pole. How do you believe the Hatted figure/Wiegman? in the Bell still frame above, got to be on the (L) side of the light pole? He had to of moved (L) across the knoll. And, bear in mind that the Couch Film shows a figure/Wiegman? running STRAIGHT DOWN the knoll.
9


I would have been glad to escort Wanda Daniel to the Luna Hearing and have her tell of her grand mother Sarah Stanton meeting Oswald on the staircase landing outside of the 2nd Floor Lunch Room and hearing Oswald say he wasn't going down to the Front Steps to watch the motorcade but was going back in to the "Break Room" (2nd Floor Lunch Room) to eat his lunch instead...
10


January 7 rioter Ashli Babbit was shot in the front of the neck by a Capitol Building guard...She fell back in to the hallway on her back and, if you look closely at the footage, her arms and hands were raised towards her throat in the Thorburn Position EXACTLY the same way as Kennedy...

Babbit was shot from the front...
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10