Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
  Thanks for posting that still frame from the Darnell snippet. When an officer makes a call from his motorcycle, that specific motorcycle has a number that is then automatically attached to the transcript of that radio transmission. That number is not the result of a possible "verbal" number being given. During his WC testimony, Officer Haygood verified both his number and his having made the 12:35 radio transmission.
   With this same Darnell snippet showing the Elm St Ext to be jammed with people, means we are seeing this "No Glove Cop" at around 12:38. This is well after Officer Haygood made his documented 12:35 police radio transmission from his motorcycle parked at the Elm St curb near the Triple Underpass. The "No Glove Cop" we see on the Darnell Film is NOT Officer Haygood.   
RS: When an officer makes a call from his motorcycle, that specific motorcycle has a number that is then automatically attached to the transcript of that radio transmission. That number is not the result of a possible "verbal" number being given

This is simply not true. None of it. Harkness was unit 260 that day, but the Martin film shows that he was riding three-wheeler 99. Tippit was unit 78, but with driving car 10. In the DPD radio recordings, it's obvious that the transmitting officer's mouth is the generating the unit number, which is then repeated  by the (human) transcriptionist.  In 1963, the technology didn't exist to to automatically stamp the vehicle number on the transmission or the recording in any practical way.

2
     You are another that is short on detailed foundational knowledge. You need to bone up on Euins WC Testimony and the structures which stretch down the Elm St. Extension. In Euins WC Testimony, he indicated on a map where he 1st came into contact with Officer Harkness. This point of contact was where the buildings running down the Elm St Extension end and a FENCE then begins. Inside this FENCE is ANOTHER LOADING DOCK. This additional dock also connects to the TSBD. If you continued walking directly out into the railroad yard from the end of this chain link fence, you would come to the Check Point that Harkness set up out there in order to secure the back of the TSBD. This would be where we see Harkness and the "No Glove Cop" within feet of each other on the Darnell Film.  Belin asked Harkness - "BEHIND the builiding?" And Harkness replied, "NO sir, this area right here".
     I don't mind helping you out, but please do your necessary JFK Assassination research beforehand. Thanks
I'm assuming that by "FENCE" you're talking about the v-shaped chain link fence between the first RR yard spur and the TSBD parking are west of the annex covered parking. He could also be referring to the GK picket fence; he doesn't specify. I'm going to bend cardinal directions a bit so they match the main downtown Dallas street grid. The chain link fence meets the Elm St extension west of the TSBD and well clear of any part of the Depository.

In the Darnell film, it is easily apparent that Darnell's position is in line with the south curb of the Elm St extension, and that Harkness is about 25-30' north of Darnell's position. Which would put Harkness more or less in line with the north side of the Elm St extension. In turn, this puts him directly west any position he would have taken next to the fence. And not by that far. So, if Harkness is not behind the TSBD when he's on the ESX near the fence, he's also not behind the TSBD when he's at his position in the Darnell film.

That being said, it's worth repeating that "behind" is the opposite of 'in front of." In front of the TSBD is to the south of it. That would put "behind" to the north of the building. The Darnell film shows Harkness to the west of the SW corner of the building. Anyone with the sense of a mule can figure this out. 

 
3
  Thanks for posting that still frame from the Darnell snippet. When an officer makes a call from his motorcycle, that specific motorcycle has a number that is then automatically attached to the transcript of that radio transmission. That number is not the result of a possible "verbal" number being given. During his WC testimony, Officer Haygood verified both his number and his having made the 12:35 radio transmission.
   With this same Darnell snippet showing the Elm St Ext to be jammed with people, means we are seeing this "No Glove Cop" at around 12:38. This is well after Officer Haygood made his documented 12:35 police radio transmission from his motorcycle parked at the Elm St curb near the Triple Underpass. The "No Glove Cop" we see on the Darnell Film is NOT Officer Haygood.   

 ' "When an officer makes a call from his motorcycle, that specific motorcycle has a number that is then automatically attached to the transcript of that radio transmission. That number is not the result of a possible "verbal" number being given." ' 

 Can you clarify this for me?

 My question is:  How does a number from an officer's transmission over the radio become a "transcript", unless someone transcribes the recording-like Bowles did for the WC?  This doesn't have anything to do with the radio he is using.  Officers have a call# they use, and they give that number to the dispatcher.  So what number are you referring to?    My point is, is that Haygood is walking towards the parked 3 wheeler seen in the Darnell film ( I know you don't believe it's Haygood, but I do), and he could have easily used the 3 wheeler's radio to make his 12:35 transmission to dispatch. 
4
August 17, 1961

5

 I circled a three wheel motorcycle on the right side of a frame from the Darnell film, and the officer with one glove off is walking toward it.  Could it be that Haygood made the transmission he made at 12:35 from the circled 3-wheel motorcycle which he's walking towards? 



  Thanks for posting that still frame from the Darnell snippet. When an officer makes a call from his motorcycle, that specific motorcycle has a number that is then automatically attached to the transcript of that radio transmission. That number is not the result of a possible "verbal" number being given. During his WC testimony, Officer Haygood verified both his number and his having made the 12:35 radio transmission.
   With this same Darnell snippet showing the Elm St Ext to be jammed with people, means we are seeing this "No Glove Cop" at around 12:38. This is well after Officer Haygood made his documented 12:35 police radio transmission from his motorcycle parked at the Elm St curb near the Triple Underpass. The "No Glove Cop" we see on the Darnell Film is NOT Officer Haygood.     
6
   The Cabluck Photo shows Officer Haygood standing on a section of concrete below the wooden fencing. Use the "Photo Gallery" posted here to look at it.
   Officer Haygood gave Warren Commission testimony that after entering the railroad yard, he saw a man he "presumed" to be a railroad detective. Haygood said nothing about talking with the cop posted on the North East of the overpass.
    The Motorcycle Cop we see inside the railroad yard on the Darnell/Martin Films is NOT OFFICER HAYGOOD. The timelines of Officer Haygood and Officer Harkness make it impossible for the 2 of them to be filmed back there before 12:35. 12:35 is when Officer Haygood made a documented police radio transmission from his motorcycle parked at the Elm St Curb.


 I circled a three wheel motorcycle on the right side of a frame from the Darnell film, and the officer with one glove off is walking toward it.  Could it be that Haygood made the transmission he made at 12:35 from the circled 3-wheel motorcycle which he's walking towards? 

7

"BC" wrote: There is a possibility DeMohrenschildt was an Iron Curtain asset, or double agent. All the more reason for Solie to have Moore contact DeM. and have him surveil LHO?

My reply:

1) Contrary to what Freddy said earlier, Solie and Moore worked in different parts of the CIA.

2) Although we know that Moore approached DeMohrenschildt in 1957 for info on Yugoslavia, he was later warned off him due to GdM's shady connections.

3) We have only probable KGB agent DeMohrenschildt's word that he discussed LHO with Moore.

4) Moore denied it under oath and said the that last time he'd spoken with GdM was in the fall of 1961.

5) How ya like dem apples, "BC"?

Edited and bumped for "BC"
8
I did a separate video on the Umbrella man.

9
Finally, the truth about what happened in Dealey Plaza, from a trusted CIA disinformation expert.


  Who let Groden's brother off of his leash?
10
 Thumb1: Nice work as always Fred
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10