Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Tippit Myth
« Last post by Tom Graves on Today at 08:14:13 AM »
Quote from: Martin Weidmann on Today at 07:08:28 AM
And with this comment he actually confirms that the evidence the WC ignored or misrepresented does indeed lead to a possible conspiracy conclusion.  Thumb1:

Knock yourself out, Weidmann.
2
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Education Forum Moderated by Anti-Semitic Crackpot---John Simkin is Aware
« Last post by Mark Ulrik on Today at 08:09:22 AM »
Quote from: Dr. William Niederhut on Yesterday at 08:35:27 PM

Thanks, Mark.

I appreciate your posting of the Copilot second opinion.

We have had some interesting analyses of AI history posts on the Education Forum.

The consensus is that some of these AI programs have a lot to learn-- especially about military and intelligence black ops.

AI is good at "augmenting" human analysis, but it will be interesting to see what else it might be able to bring to the table regarding the JFKA.

Btw and Fwiw, my little Copilot friend is a better man than most of us who post here. It finds it counterproductive to call other people "crackpots" and prefers to say that they tend to gravitate toward unconventional claims and become more committed when those claims are questioned.
3
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Tippit Myth
« Last post by Martin Weidmann on Today at 07:08:28 AM »
Quote from: Tom Graves on Today at 01:38:13 AM
No, not at all!

You can incorporate all of the fringe anti-WC stuff you want!

But unfortunately, you'll end up with a tinfoil-hat CT that requires oodles and gobs of evil, evil "Deep State" bad guys.

And with this comment he actually confirms that the evidence the WC ignored or misrepresented does indeed lead to a possible conspiracy conclusion.  Thumb1:

4
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Tippit Myth
« Last post by Martin Weidmann on Today at 07:00:20 AM »
Quote from: Tom Graves on Yesterday at 11:05:56 PM
So, are you denying that the vast majority of JFK-influenced tinfoil-hat JFKA conspiracy theorists believe Oswald was "patsied" Mr. Rhetorical?

So, you don't really want to have a conversation and are merely trolling.

I'm not wasting my time on your nonsense. Bye!
5
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Tippit Myth
« Last post by Tom Graves on Today at 01:38:13 AM »
Quote from: Louis Earl on Today at 01:23:44 AM
So . . . we have to disregard all testimony and witnesses whose evidence conflicts with the WC and accept all the testimony from other wideness who were also looking at "spring loaded clocks"? 

Well!  That was easy! 

Next!

No, not at all!

You can incorporate all of the fringe anti-WC stuff you want!

But unfortunately, you'll end up with a tinfoil-hat CT that requires oodles and gobs of evil, evil "Deep State" bad guys.
6
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Tippit Myth
« Last post by Louis Earl on Today at 01:23:44 AM »
So . . . we have to disregard all testimony and witnesses whose evidence conflicts with the WC and accept all the testimony from other wideness who were also looking at "spring loaded clocks"? 

Well!  That was easy! 

Next!
7
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Tippit Myth
« Last post by Tom Graves on Yesterday at 11:05:56 PM »
Quote from: Martin Weidmann on Yesterday at 10:32:45 PM
The vast majority of KGB-influenced tinfoil-hat JFKA conspiracy theorists are adamant that Oswald was "patsied."

Are they? So, you just figured you could generalize it?

So, are you denying that the vast majority of JFK-influenced tinfoil-hat JFKA conspiracy theorists believe Oswald was "patsied" Mr. Rhetorical?
8
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Tippit Myth
« Last post by Martin Weidmann on Yesterday at 10:32:45 PM »
Quote from: Tom Graves on Yesterday at 10:10:42 PM
Dear Marty,

The vast majority of KGB-influenced tinfoil-hat JFKA conspiracy theorists are adamant that Oswald was "patsied," that there was more than one shooter, that evidence was planted, that photos, films and X-rays were altered, and that the "coverup" is continuing!

Aren't you?

-- Tom

The vast majority of KGB-influenced tinfoil-hat JFKA conspiracy theorists are adamant that Oswald was "patsied,"

Are they?

So, you just figured you could generalize it?

Are you one of those silly people who actually believes that if somebody doesn't instantly and superficially accepts the BS you believe in, must be a "conspiracy theorist" (whatever that means)?

If you want to have a conversation with me, why don't you simply answer my questions and we'll take it from there.
9
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: The Umbrella Man At The House Select Committee Questioning Interview 1978
« Last post by Tom Graves on Yesterday at 10:28:11 PM »
Quote from: Paul J Cummings on Yesterday at 10:19:52 PM
Correct me if I'm wrong. The umbrella he had after 15 years (yeah right) was not the same one that pictures show in DP.

He'd probably given his fléchette-shooting one back to the evil, evil CIA.
10
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: The Umbrella Man At The House Select Committee Questioning Interview 1978
« Last post by Paul J Cummings on Yesterday at 10:19:52 PM »
Correct me if I'm wrong. The umbrella he had after 15 years (yeah right) was not the same one that pictures show in DP.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10