JFK Assassination Forum

Dear Sonderführer Storing,

Read it and weep.

https://www.acsr.org/post/estimating-occult-timing-of-surprise-gunshot-sounds-in-silent-film-via-observed-start-of-human-vol

-- Tom

Thanks very much James. That’s helpful. I think that we are interpreting what we see in the Wiegman film frame differently. I see two different cars in the gap between fedora man and purse lady. In the following image I have drawn yellow arrows, one pointing at the right taillight of the Pontiac and another one pointing at the front right wheel of the Pontiac. Please notice that my interpretation of the Weigman frame has the taillight lined up with the western edge of the opening for the large gates and the front right wheel to the camera right of the post. While your interpretation (image) has the taillight lined up with a point on that surface a few feet further west and the front right wheel to the camera left of the post.



Charles, from the nose of the car to that shadow area is about right for a VW bug's tail end. That 17.5' car must be well west of that area. There is no evidence for a background car parked in front of the gates. I want to work this out with you. Tomorrow I will make an overhead graphic that might be of use.

  The Wiegman Film does Not show a 17.5 Foot Long car that stands 5 Feet High. This is an extremely huge rectangle of space. That's Reality. The Lego Car stuff is pure conjecture. "Gumby" cartoonish. I continue to confidently issue the challenge, "PROVE ME WRONG".

I haven't been a regular contributor on any online forum regarding the JFK assassination in about five years. I don't know why but I just recently decided to revisit the subject. I've browsed this forum and others and one thing I have definitely noticed is the volume of posts is way down from what I saw when I was a regular contributor. I regularly participated in two Google Groups forums, alt.assassination.jfk (moderated by John McAdams) and alt.conspiracy.jfk(unmoderated). Both forums would see quite a few new topics started each day and it would not be unusual to see some topics get dozens of posts each day. As of 4:30 ET today, I see only 6 topics that have had any activity at all today and those that have only have one or two posts. I've looked at a few of the other online discussion groups and they seem to have even less activity than this one.

I began discussing the JFK assassination and conspiracy theories online shortly after Oliver Stone's movie came out. I participated on and off in various forums for about 30 years and had walked away from them about five years ago. I can say without hesitation that I've never seen such a low level of interest in the subject of JFK's assassination. It is not surprising given that it has been over 62 years since it happened. That is the same time span as the one between JFK's assassination and McKinley's assassination. IOW, both are ancient history to anyone under 70 years old. I was in 7th grade when JFK died and am now 74. Why would anyone from younger generations have much interest in the subject. Why would anyone who doesn't remember JFK when he was alive bother to argue about how he died.

History books and online sources mostly identify Oswald as the assassin while recognizing that there is a significant percentage of the American people who don't believe he acted alone. The fact that many doubt this doesn't mean they are obsessed about it. Most of them go about their daily lives without ever giving the question a thought. I've had periods where I was among those people but for reasons I can't explain, I keep coming back. The fact that there doesn't seem to be any discussion groups with significant activity probably means my own interest won't last for long.