Recent Posts
Why not base your analysis on the evidence? Do you really know that JFK is not already reacting in z224?:
The first hint of a physical sign of JFK reacting to being shot can be seen in z225.
How soon before this had the bullet passed through his body?
JBC is reacting to the shot that JFK is reacting to. But according to the evidence that is the first shot and he is reacting to hearing it and recognizing it as a rifle shot and realizing that JFK was the likely target. So he is reacting to it by turning around to look at JFK. That is not a theory. That is just going by the evidence. The “theory” is that the evidence is all wrong.
In my opinion it shows JBC having an extreme reaction, most likely to being shot:
I can only say I'm flummoxed by anyone who can look at this clip and honestly say there is no radical reaction in the frames immediately following z222/z223.
Use your own eyes.
There's no need to get lost in JBC's faulty recollection of the massively traumatising, life-threatening injury that threw his whole body into shock. There is copious amounts written about the distorting effects trauma can have on memory. This must be taken into account.
I really don't give a shit what you focus on. I just find it silly.
Problems. What problems would that be? Are you denying the shells recovered at the scene could only have been fired by the revolver had in his possession when he tried to shoot the arresting officer?
Are you denying Oswald had the same two makes of bullets that were recovered from Tippit's body? Are you denying Oswald's jacket was found on his escape route? Are you denying Oswald tried to shoot the arresting officer? Are you denying that numerous witnesses IDed Oswald? Just which of the items that I listed do you have problems with?
OK, you go ahead and investigate it and report back to us what you find.
When somebody tells me I have to focus on particular pieces of evidence, it only tells me that they don't want me beyond what they want me to believe.
None of the 5 items you have listed, we actually know. There are all sorts of problems which you are unwilling to see or discuss.
Knowing all this, do we really need to focus on wallets to figure out who shot JDT?
Yes, when two police officers tell a different story about a crucial piece of evidence, it needs to be investigated. The fact that it wasn't is telling a story by itself.
AI-version:
Investigative journalist and assassination expert Gus Russo maintains that elements of the Cuban intelligence service (known as the G-2, or DGI) likely encouraged Lee Harvey Oswald to assassinate President Kennedy in retaliation for continuous U.S. plots to overthrow or assassinate Fidel Castro.
Russo, along with other researchers, argues that Oswald—a fervent Castro supporter—traveled to Mexico City in September 1963 and made contact with Cuban diplomats and intelligence operatives. According to Russo's investigations (detailed in his book Live by the Sword), members of the Cuban regime were made aware of U.S. attempts to assassinate Castro, and they may have in turn accepted or encouraged Oswald’s offer to eliminate Kennedy.[/quote}
I guess the Cubans and Oswalds were just hoping that one day Oswald would have a job at a building overlooking a presidential motorcade route.Quote
Russo's research builds on declassified documents and interviews with Cuban defectors. For instance, a controversial 2006 documentary co-authored by Russo (Rendezvous with Death) further alleged that Cuban intelligence contracted Oswald to carry out the assassination.
---30---
I have watched the Rendevous With Death documentary, and it is pretty good.
---30---
Due the cadence or sequence of bullet strikes on JBC-JFK, the LNT-SBT JFKA theory does not hold water.
As Trump said to his Energy Secretary yesterday when he started speaking incoherently, "Nobody cares".
Most JFKA researchers, being lefties, then fabricate elaborate tales of a Deep State JFKA.
Some righties, such as James Woolsey, blame Moscow.
Seems to me a low-level plot involving LHO and some G-2'ers, or Alpha 66'ers (who may have been G2 double agents), is more probable.
---30---
Remember:
Connally: I was knocked over, just doubled over by the force of the bullet. It went in my back and came out my chest about 2 inches below and the left of my right nipple. The force of the bullet drove my body over almost double and when I looked, immediately I could see I was just drenched with blood. (1 HSCA 42)
Explain to me when this happens, in what frames of the Z-film?
This focus on wallets is another fine example of CTs focusing on all the wrong things. The right thing to focus on are these.
1. When arrested, Oswald had in his possession the only revolver in the world which could have fired the shells that the shooter emptied from his revolver as he fled the scene.
2. Oswald had the same two makes of bullets, Remingtons and Winchesters, that were removed from Tippit's body.
3. Oswald's jacket was found on the route the shooter had fled after shooting Tippit.
4. When he was arrested, Oswald tried to shoot the arresting officer.
5. Numerous witnesses IDed Oswald either as the shooter or the man they saw fleeing the scene with a gun in his hand. I don't normally place much faith in UNCORROBORATED witness accounts. These witnesses are corroborated by the fact the person they IDed had the murder weapon in his possession when arrested.
Knowing all this, do we really need to focus on wallets to figure out who shot JDT?
JC--
The whereabouts of LHO in MC are largely unknown, after his visits to the Russian and Cuban facilities. It is known he met with G-2'ers, who encouraged him to assassinate JFK.
No one knew LHO would have a perch in the TSBD6 at that time.
I have stated many times, LHO and his confederates simply got lucky on the motorcade route, and took advantage of the situation.
LHO did prospect other locations along the parade route.
If, in a counterfactual, the motorcade had chosen a different route, LHO and confederates likely would have altered their plans.
LN's don't need an explanation as to how Walker and Bentley both said they had Oswald's wallet: Walker didn't claim he had the wallet, just the Hidell ID., indeed!
Here's his testimony to the WC:
https://www.jfk-assassination.net/russ/testimony/walker_c.htm
and here's his report to Curry regarding his activity that day:
https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth339196/?q=report%20walker
