Recent Posts
1
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: How Did Bart Kamp Create The Lovelady Image?
« Last post by Royell Storing on Today at 05:36:48 PM »Below are two cropped images designed to emphasise that the Sprague image, from which Kemp got his incredibly detailed Lovelady image, has been tampered with.
The top image is a crop from the Sprague image (note the light square around the two figures on the Elm Street extension. This alone should have alarm bells ringing).
The bottom image is a crop of a screen grab from "4 Days in November".
It is beyond question that the 4 Days image is far superior in quality and the amount of information it contains than the Sprague image. Look at the lattice pattern on the TSBD building wall. It is not visible in the Sprague image. There is a car parked next to the building which is barely visible it's so washed out in the Sprague image but is clearly visible in the 4 Days image.
Yet it is from the washed out Sprague image that the super-fine detail of 'Lovelady's' shirt emerges when none of this detail is present in the far superior 4 Days image.
This is proof the Sprague image has been faked.
Have you examined the Gerda Dunckel Gifs over on You Tube? I prefer the "Gerda Dunckel Gif 2".
I believe her Gifs show both figures are Not Lovelady and Shelley. The images provide better defined views of both guys hairlines and (L) ears. These gifs do not directly address the Lovelady shirt issue, but if that is Not Lovelady, that is Not his plaid shirt.
2
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / LHO and Cuban Intelligence
« Last post by Brian Doyle on Today at 04:38:32 PM »The first source I go to on a CIA assassination is CIA and their obvious mainstream propaganda...
And I don't mind that CIA Baer is skipping most of the incriminating evidence...
3
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: The First Shot
« Last post by Jack Nessan on Today at 04:27:19 PM »It could have been done before Givens returned to the 6th floor to retrieve his jacket and cigarettes
That was put in there especially for you. As you do, you completely missed the important details of Givens testimony. The fact you never quite pick up on the details and how there is always other testimony to be considered is laughable, but not in the way that you think.
4
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: LHO and Cuban Intelligence
« Last post by Steve M. Galbraith on Today at 03:58:58 PM »There is nothing that I see in Baer's theory where he says Oswald had links, direct or indirect, to Cuban intelligence. His theory is that Oswald (for some reason) told Alpha 66 that he was going to shoot JFK (when and where did this happen?). And Cuban agents who had infiltrated Alpha 66 then reported Oswald's threat/promise back to Havana.
Here is Baer as to why Cuba didn't tell the US about this threat: "It’s risky if there are actual Cuban agents shooting the President, that’s Armageddon, nuclear war. But if you simply hear rumors of this, you don’t do anything. I’ve seen that happen in the CIA, where we heard stuff and didn’t pass the details to another government because it was a hostile government."
So Oswald's supposed threats become "rumors" that Havana heard? That's why they didn't tell the US? Did Oswald make the threat or was it just a rumor?
This really sounds like he's throwing things against the wall and hoping something sticks.
Here is Baer as to why Cuba didn't tell the US about this threat: "It’s risky if there are actual Cuban agents shooting the President, that’s Armageddon, nuclear war. But if you simply hear rumors of this, you don’t do anything. I’ve seen that happen in the CIA, where we heard stuff and didn’t pass the details to another government because it was a hostile government."
So Oswald's supposed threats become "rumors" that Havana heard? That's why they didn't tell the US? Did Oswald make the threat or was it just a rumor?
This really sounds like he's throwing things against the wall and hoping something sticks.
5
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / How Did Bart Kamp Create The Lovelady Image?
« Last post by Brian Doyle on Today at 03:49:08 PM »The Sprague enhancement is better for bringing out Lovelady's plaid pattern and Shelley's white shirt collar...(And Lovelady's bald spot)...None of these have been doctored and they will appear exactly the same on the original film...
I'm sure this issue would be more solved than it already has been if the original celluloid were gotten and scanned...
The Prayer Man people are cheaters because they hold back and don't participate in further examining the evidence...Instead they ban and censor in order to protect their dirty clique...The Education Forum is all a group of sycophants and friends so when they cheat and with-hold evidence they get encouraged and rewarded on the forum...Being internet hacks, they make it a personal school yard contest that they take a little too much pleasure in but that doesn't stop them from selling themselves as serious researchers...Somehow Larsen managed to enhance Lovelady's plaid bars better than Kamp did and their irregular pattern matched perfectly beyond a doubt ending the issue...When I managed to get a message past the censorship filters the clique sets up for people who disprove them and told Larsen he had just proven the time Frazier was staring in shock at Sarah Stanton instead of admitting this evidence he went back and deleted his photo analysis of the plaid bars...
The two men are obviously Shelley & Lovelady...
6
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Determining a Timestamp for Darnell
« Last post by Steve Barber on Today at 03:31:42 PM »7
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Determining a Timestamp for Darnell
« Last post by Dan O'meara on Today at 03:12:57 PM »Excellent work, John, as always!
I think the next step would be to find someone here in the forum who lives in Dallas or very near, to go to Dealey Plaza and take their cell phone, and mimic Dave Wiegman filming from the steps, lying in the same position he is in in the Bell film, and also in the position Royell claims he's in?
Maybe Royell could do it
8
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: How Did Bart Kamp Create The Lovelady Image?
« Last post by Dan O'meara on Today at 03:10:48 PM »Below are two cropped images designed to emphasise that the Sprague image, from which Kemp got his incredibly detailed Lovelady image, has been tampered with.
The top image is a crop from the Sprague image (note the light square around the two figures on the Elm Street extension. This alone should have alarm bells ringing).
The bottom image is a crop of a screen grab from "4 Days in November".
It is beyond question that the 4 Days image is far superior in quality and the amount of information it contains than the Sprague image. Look at the lattice pattern on the TSBD building wall. It is not visible in the Sprague image. There is a car parked next to the building which is barely visible it's so washed out in the Sprague image but is clearly visible in the 4 Days image.
Yet it is from the washed out Sprague image that the super-fine detail of 'Lovelady's' shirt emerges when none of this detail is present in the far superior 4 Days image.
This is proof the Sprague image has been faked.
The top image is a crop from the Sprague image (note the light square around the two figures on the Elm Street extension. This alone should have alarm bells ringing).
The bottom image is a crop of a screen grab from "4 Days in November".
It is beyond question that the 4 Days image is far superior in quality and the amount of information it contains than the Sprague image. Look at the lattice pattern on the TSBD building wall. It is not visible in the Sprague image. There is a car parked next to the building which is barely visible it's so washed out in the Sprague image but is clearly visible in the 4 Days image.
Yet it is from the washed out Sprague image that the super-fine detail of 'Lovelady's' shirt emerges when none of this detail is present in the far superior 4 Days image.
This is proof the Sprague image has been faked.
9
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: New Look Forum
« Last post by Steve Barber on Today at 03:06:13 PM »How about this new modern and cleaner look for the Forum? YES? NO?
The pages also adjusts to appear like an app for most Cell Phones / Mobile Phones
I still need to do some more work on a few things, but everyone let me know if you approve it or not. I can change back to ther previous look at any time.
Definitely YES! It's GREAT, Duncan! Thanks a million!
10
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Determining a Timestamp for Darnell
« Last post by Steve Barber on Today at 03:03:47 PM »To settle this nonsense once and for all, I made a small GIF from Wiegman's perspective.
Wiegman sees an opportunity for some dramatic footage and runs to the steps, the camera POV passes over the steps
The camera goes from shaking wildly to being incredibly steady for a few seconds, which means he isn't stumbling, but is resting his elbow on the the top step which is obvious in Steve's Bell still, in Bell's stabilized footage and the height of the camera in Wiegman's footage.
Bell's stabilized footage of Wiegman.
A clear frame of Wiegman on the steps.
JohnM
Excellent work, John, as always!
I think the next step would be to find someone here in the forum who lives in Dallas or very near, to go to Dealey Plaza and take their cell phone, and mimic Dave Wiegman filming from the steps, lying in the same position he is in in the Bell film, and also in the position Royell claims he's in?