JFK Assassination Forum

RS: As usual, you leave out that which You Missed right out of the gate. Officer Harkness's #99 3 Wheel Motorcycle is sitting right there next to Inspector Sawyer's car.

I already addressed that, but I guess it hasn't sunk in with you yet. Here's a refresher.  Note that Harkness' cycle is facing to the west in the Nat Geo clip. However, when Harkness is carrying Euins to the front of the TSBD, they're headed east. If the Nat Geo clip was taken before Harkness went to the seal off the north side of the TSBD, then it would have been facing east. But it's facing the opposite direction. However, if the clip was taken after Harkness returned to the front of the TSBD after he was relieved on  the north side, we'd expect it to be facing west (i.e. Harkness drove the trike southwards down Houston, then a right on to Elm and the space next to Sawyer's car.)


And you're now stuck trying to Mickey Mouse the Harkness Timeline. His documented 12:36 radio transmission and his WC Testimony as to the order he did what he did, gives him a very firm timeline

My timeline for Harnkess doesn't contradict the 12:36 transmission in any way. You just aren't thinking.


It is physically impossible for Officer Harkness and Officer Haygood to be filmed together prior to Officer Haygood making his own documented 12:35 radio transmission.

You can't argue for your own points, nor against mine. All you can do is mindlessly repeat the same unsupported assertions.

   The above is hilarious. YOU have no evidence as to what Harkness did with his 3 Wheel Motorcycle. Zippo. The 12:36 Harkness radio transmission and his WC Testimony telling us he then helped load Euins into Inspector Sawyer's car are FACTS.  The stuff your peddling is pure speculation thrown out there AFTER my proving it is physically impossible for Haygood and Harkness to be filmed together at 12:34. That Troika image is 12:38. This puts Officer Haygood back at his motorcycle and gives Walthers time to get to the Elm St manhole cover for his 12:39 photo. These are FACTS. That DPD Motorcycle Cop is a fraud. 

   As usual, you leave out that which You Missed right out of the gate. Officer Harkness's #99 3 Wheel Motorcycle is sitting right there next to Inspector Sawyer's car. I had to inform you as to the Harkness 3 Wheeler being in that Nat Geo snippet. And you're now stuck trying to Mickey Mouse the Harkness Timeline. His documented 12:36 radio transmission and his WC Testimony as to the order he did what he did, gives him a very firm timeline. It is physically impossible for Officer Harkness and Officer Haygood to be filmed together prior to Officer Haygood making his own documented 12:35 radio transmission. "That Ain't Haygood"!

RS: As usual, you leave out that which You Missed right out of the gate. Officer Harkness's #99 3 Wheel Motorcycle is sitting right there next to Inspector Sawyer's car.

I already addressed that, but I guess it hasn't sunk in with you yet. Here's a refresher.  Note that Harkness' cycle is facing to the west in the Nat Geo clip. However, when Harkness is carrying Euins to the front of the TSBD, they're headed east. If the Nat Geo clip was taken before Harkness went to the seal off the north side of the TSBD, then it would have been facing east. But it's facing the opposite direction. However, if the clip was taken after Harkness returned to the front of the TSBD after he was relieved on  the north side, we'd expect it to be facing west (i.e. Harkness drove the trike southwards down Houston, then a right on to Elm and the space next to Sawyer's car.)


And you're now stuck trying to Mickey Mouse the Harkness Timeline. His documented 12:36 radio transmission and his WC Testimony as to the order he did what he did, gives him a very firm timeline

My timeline for Harnkess doesn't contradict the 12:36 transmission in any way. You just aren't thinking.


It is physically impossible for Officer Harkness and Officer Haygood to be filmed together prior to Officer Haygood making his own documented 12:35 radio transmission.

You can't argue for your own points, nor against mine. All you can do is mindlessly repeat the same unsupported assertions.

And that alone makes you the last person in the world anybody should try to have a normal conversation with.

What a pathetic little man you really are. I truly feel sorry for you.

I don't know whether to kill myself or go bowling.

For once you are right. I do have a big ego. And with good reason.

And that alone makes you the last person in the world anybody should try to have a normal conversation with.

What a pathetic little man you really are. I truly feel sorry for you.

I've been debating the JFKA online for about 35 years on various forums. The conspiracy hobbyists' game hasn't changed much over the years. They act like a defense lawyer who knows his client is guilty as hell and his only hope is to try to confuse the jury by bringing up red herring objections to the evidence against his client.

This reminds me of one of two criminal trials on which I served as a juror. It was a simple check forgery case. The cops had gotten a confession from the defendant by offering him a diversion program which would have kept him out of jail. Then they looked at his priors and told him he wasn't eligible for the program at which time he recanted his confession. He never actually signed the confession. In the meantime he had given the cops several handwriting samples. One of them was what was called a London Letter. The idea being that even if a suspect tries to disguise his handwriting, he will eventually lapse back into his own. The other thing he did was write out the same names that were on the forged checks.

The irony is if the defendant had just clammed up and asked for a lawyer from the start, there would have been no case against him. The defense attorney hinted at that in his opening statement. The prosecution had the cops testify about the oral but recanted confession. A handwriting expert testified the forged checks were written in the defendant's handwriting. They put into evidence the forged checks and the handwriting sample. The defense attorney presented no witnesses. His whole defense was to pooh-pooh the prosecution's case. He scoffed at the cops claim of an oral confession and the handwriting experts testimony. Then he said "What evidence do they have? A piece of paper?" as he picked up one of the checks and tossed it back down dismissively.

Then we got back into the jury room and looked at the handwriting samples and compared them to the forged checks. You didn't need to be a handwriting expert to know they were written by the same hand. The signatures looked like carbon copies. We reached a guilty verdict in about a half hour and didn't even have to consider the cops claim of a confession or the expert testimony.

The WC presented far more evidence of Oswald's guilt in both homicides than was presented by the prosecution in the forgery case. Like the defense attorney in that case who was dealt a losing hand, all the conspiracy hobbyists can do is pooh-pooh the evidence against Oswald. Their problems is that there is just so damn much of it that it becomes ridiculous to argue for Oswald's innocence. The forensic evidence alone removes any and all doubt that Oswald murdered two men that day, but that doesn't stop the conspiracy hobbyists from coming up with one excuse after another for why we shouldn't believe what the evidence is screaming at us. OSWALD DID IT!!!