The Nutter narrative is that from 12:00 noon until Bonnie Ray left the 6th floor (around 12:25pm), Oswald was hidden in the SN, quiet as a mouse, just a few yards away from Bonnie Ray as he ate his lunch sat on an incredibly uncomfortable trolley while he looked out on Dealey Plaza through a closed, dirty window.
For almost half an hour Oswald hid in silence.
And he must have been really, amazingly silent because there was no work going on in the TSBD building. Most employees were outside waiting for the parade.
Silence.
For almost half an hour.
Can't assemble a rifle in silence.
Can't move Rolling Reader boxes around in silence.

So let's not accept the lies of the Warren Commission Sham.
Once we accept that the accounts of Williams, Givens, Lovelady, Arce and Piper, it turns out Oswald never had enough time to even get into the SN before Bonnie Ray was in position, let alone organise the SN or assemble a rifle.
And what's with Arnold Rowland's sighting of a white male, fitting the description of the shooter as seen by others, with a scoped rifle at the southwest end of the 6th floor 15 minutes before the arrival of the motorcade in Dealey Plaza.
And what to make of Arnold's observation of a black male in the SN at the same time, who disappeared around 5 minutes before the motorcade arrived?
And what to make of the statements of every single one of the first responders, at least 6 of them, who put the remains of Bonnie Rays lunch in the SN before Fritz arrived on the scene?

What, exactly, was the Warren Commission Sham trying to cover up?

The scenario to explain Oswald at the SW window at 12:15 requires one to accept that Oswald would not have checked out the whole  6th floor first before  carrying a rifle ( even if covered by a bag ) to the SW window.

Oswald Not checking the floor first is like Oswald  carrying  the Hidell fake ID in his billfold while shooting JFK and Tippit and ordering a rifle sent to his own real name Oswald P.O.Box. Seems rather inconsistent with the  Oswald who was supposed to be this methodical planner as per his photographing General Walkers house and his car and making a map to plot how he supposedly took a poorly aimed shot at Walker.

I firmly believe that you suffer with mental illness, MTG.
 
You're an egomaniacal narcissist.

That's one of his endearing qualities.

       Do you know anybody that STANDS like this? And, we are seeing Wiegman physically on the grass.

You appear to have some kind of mental health issue.
Weigman is not standing in this picture as I've been telling you all along.
I identified this man as Weigman at the very beginning of then thread.
He is lying across the couple of steps leading to the concrete walkway, as I've been telling you all along.
I've been telling you from the very beginning of this thread that the guy is Weigman and that he is lying across the steps as he films the Hesters.
I've been telling you this all along.

You are a complete waste of time.
You can barely grasp reality.
Weigman stays in this position for the couple of seconds we see him there in the Bell footage.
It appears that he is about to get up but he doesn't move anywhere.
Your insistence that he is running or stood up is disturbing. You are seeing things that just aren't there.

It was me who told you this was Weigman.
Me who has been synchronising this moment to the Z-film.
You have done nothing only waste my time with your lies and 

That is not true.
This figure is not moving across the grass.
He appears for less than two seconds and does not move from that spot.
There is a suggestion this figure is starting to get up from a prone position, that's all.
I can't understand how you are seeing him moving across the grass when it doesn't happen.
Below are three stills from the Bell film showing this figure when we first see him, half way though and the last moment we see him. The duration of his appearance is less than 2 seconds. In that time he does not move from that spot.
On top of that, he is not stood up, he is lying across the steps and about to get up:

       Do you know anybody that STANDS like this? And, we are seeing Wiegman physically on the grass.

      Again, if you want to have Wiegman standing stock still and filming nothing, you are expanding his timeline. Not to mention after filming the Hester's, why would he just stand stock still? And exactly who other than Groucho Marx "stands" like we see Wiegman doing on the Bell Film?

In the Bell footage we do not see Weigman running or moving anywhere.
You are a liar to keep insisting he does.
Post an image of Weigman running in the Bell film.
You won't be able to.
Your constant lying has really diminished my view of you.

And state the REPLY in this thread where you told me who the Weigman figure was.
You can't.
You're just a liar.