1
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / I have a confession to make
« Last post by Brian Doyle on Today at 05:04:37 PM »Keep going and admit you have made a huge mistake backing the Warren Commission...
The estimates of the time frame varied widely which is an indication everyone who offered an opinion was guessing. A few of the guesses seem to have been close and some were off by quite a bit. The Z-film gives us a very good measurement of the time frame for the two shots that hit JFK because there are clear visual clues for when those occurred. At or about Z222 and definitely at Z313. That's 91 frames or 4.97 seconds. There is nothing in the Z-film that tells us positively when the first bullet was fired but I will gladly argue it was at or about Z147. The headshot would have been fired in the Z310-311 timeframe. That would be about 163 frames or 8.9 seconds. Of course since many people seem to have not recognized that first shot for what it was, there estimate would be based on the second and third shots only which take us back the 4.97 time frame.
Yes, depending on how you define “accurate”. Most people can tell the difference between 5 seconds and
ten seconds. In fact, when drug recognition experts using the standard Romberg test assess whether someone is impaired by alcohol or a drug, one of the indicia used is the 30 second estimate. If the person under-estimates by 10 seconds or more, or over estimates by 15 seconds or more that is considered as a sign of impairment. When people listen to music they can tell the difference between Andante and Allegro a difference of 80 beats per minute and 120 bpm
LOL! What a total clown show. Looks like you still have not bothered to read the transcript of Dr. Young's third 2001 interview or any of the article links I provide in the OP.
FYI, Dr. Young hand-wrote his 21-page "What Price A Rose?" recollection on 11/23/63, the day after the autopsy (see page 46 in the third-interview transcript). He sometimes referred to this document as his "notes." You'd know this if you had bothered to read the transcript or the articles linked in the OP.
Whaaat?! LOL! Really?! You would?! Are you sure?! Well, okay, go read the links that I provide in the OP. Or, go watch the segment on Dr. Young's account in episode 3 of the 2021 documentary JFK: Destiny Betrayed.
This is just hilarious!
Oh, wow! So Chief Mills and Dr. Young just made up their accounts about Dr. Young sending Chief Mills and Chief Martinell to search the limo for skull fragments and finding the limo bullet?! And Chief Mills lied through his teeth to Navy historian Jan Herman when he confirmed the finding of the limo bullet and confirmed later receiving a call from Dr. Young?! And Dr. Young was just putting on an elaborate act of pretending to be trying to find out what happened to a non-existent limo bullet when he wrote to President Ford and spoke with Arlen Specter?! That's your argument?!
The two Navy senior NCOs were sent by Dr. Young, who was the assistant to Admiral Burkley, JFK's personal physician, so, uh, yeah, of course the Secret Service let them search the limo.
Did the authorities make any attempt to investigate it?...
Who was that un-named "manager" the cops spoke to on the stairs at the Theater?...
Quote from: Michael T. Griffith on Yesterday at 01:10:23 PM
HUH? Just HUH? Dr. Young said he saw the bullet. He even gave a detailed description of it. That is "first-hand knowledge" by any definition.
Any record of Young saying that before 2001?
Quote from: Michael T. Griffith on Yesterday at 01:10:23 PM
Chief Mills confirmed to Navy historian Jan Herman that he and Martinell found a bullet in the rear of the limo and that Dr. Young later called him to verify his account. Confirmation from one of the two guys who found the bullet is "first-hand knowledge" by any definition.
I'd like to see the documentation for this claim.
The Secret Service conducted the search of the limo for physical evidence. Do you really think they would have let two Navy non-coms to just show up and search the limo. The story makes no sense, but CTs never seem to care if the myths they choose to believe make any sense.
So you think people could give accurate estimates of the time span of the shots?Yes, depending on how you define “accurate”. Most people can tell the difference between 5 seconds and