Garbage.  There was no Ukraine/Russia war under Obama.

Are you for real?  Having TDS is bad enough.  Selectively deleting from history events that you do not like are another level of delusion.  Russia invaded and occupied Crimea (an important part of Ukraine) in 2014 when Obama was president.  There was no extended conflict only because Obama refused to provide Ukraine with any meaningful assistance for fear of becoming involved in a war with Russia.  In contrast, Trump has provided Ukraine with extensive weapons systems that have allowed them to extend the current conflict.  Obama completely capitulated to the Russians in 2014:

"Obama later defended the administration's approach, noting that the situation in 2014 involved a heavily Russian-speaking region where Moscow had historical and cultural sympathizers. The administration sought to avoid escalating the conflict into a broader proxy war while maintaining cooperation on other geopolitical issues."

TG-

I think most people have a JFKA narrative in mind, and work backwards from that.

Given the preponderance of JFKA witnesses who described the 'bang...bang-bang" cadence, I am inclined to lean towards that. I concede "most witnesses" could be wrong.

However, three audible shots does not rule out inaudible shots, or simultaneous shots.

My layman's interpretation of the Z-film lines up with the "bang...bang-bang" cadence.

Why doesn't forum member Gary "Two Head Shots" Aguilar ever participate here?

(AKA "Mr. Rudeness Personified")

Is he here just to spy for the KGB?

(LOL)

Ten reasons to believe that Michael T. Griffith and his CT ilk are nuttycakes:

1) [fill in the blank]

2) [fill in the blank]

3) [fill in the blank]

4) [fill in the blank]

5) [fill in the blank]

6) [fill in the blank]

7) [fill in the blank]

8 ) [fill in the blank]

9) [fill in the blank]

10) [fill in the blank]

And one for good measure:

11) [fill in the blank]

TG-

In these various posts of yours, you say this or that JFKA witness was correct in recollections or observations that agree with your narrative, but then the very same witnesses flop terribly when their observations conflict with your narrative.

In fact, there are many conflicting witness statements regarding the JFKA, as your own posts amplify.

Most witnesses heard a "bang...bang-bang" cadence of audible shots, including Dallas Sheriff Seymour Weitzman, who said the second two JFKA shots were nearly simultaneous.

Should we believe Weitzman, a man deeply familiar with firearms?

How did LHO, armed with a single-shot-per-bolt-action rifle, fire nearly simultaneous shots?

OK, so we don't believe Weitzman, but we do believe other witnesses?

Most witnesses don't get everything wrong, and neither did Mary Woodward, imho.

What I think she got right:

1) There were three shots.

2) The first shot sounded like a "backfire." (Some witnesses said it sounded like a "firecracker")

3) The first shot missed everything.

4) JFK and Jackie turned their heads in response to the sounds of the first shot. (JFK turned his head quickly to his left in Z-143; Jackie, who was already looking to her left, started turning her head farther to her left in an accelerating manner in Z-144)

5) JFK waved directly to Woodward and her colleagues shortly before the shot that caused him to "slump," i.e., the second shot at approximately Z-222.

6) Subject to enlargement if I think of anything else.


What I think she got wrong:

1) The limo slowed to a near-halt after the first shot. (We know that it didn't do that until after the second shot.)

2) JFK waved to her and her colleagues before the first shot (We know that he started waving to them after the first shot, i.e., at Z-180 -- in which frame we can also see that JBC, having recognized Woodward's "backfire" as a shot from a high-powered rifle, has turned far to his right in an apparent attempt to "catch a glimpse of JFK over his right shoulder.")

3) Subject to enlargement if I think of anything else.


Question:

What do you think she got right?

Everything?

What do you think she got wrong?

Nothing?

If neither of the above, which parts do you think she got right, and which parts do you think she got wrong?


Hmm?