The old JFK conspiracy nut loses big time.
https://www.duluthnewstribune.com/news/crime-and-courts/2720695-Judge-rules-against-former-UMD-professor-in-Sandy-Hook-case
The old JFK conspiracy nut loses big time.
https://www.duluthnewstribune.com/news/crime-and-courts/2720695-Judge-rules-against-former-UMD-professor-in-Sandy-Hook-case
https://www.duluthnewstribune.com/news/crime-and-courts/2720695-Judge-rules-against-former-UMD-professor-in-Sandy-Hook-case
Crime and Courts
Judge rules against former UMD professor in Sandy Hook case
Written By: Chris Rickert, Wisconsin State Journal | Jun 19th 2019 -
…….
During a four-hour hearing before Circuit Judge Frank Remington, Pozner’s attorney Jacob Zimmerman offered evidence to counter Fetzer’s contention that a death certificate for Noah Pozner, an image of which was reprinted in Fetzer’s book, is a fake.
Among other things, Zimmerman pointed to separate state and local processes for issuing death certificates to explain why a state file number didn’t appear on the document. And he explained the process for listing a time of death on the document, which Fetzer claimed doesn’t match the time of the shooting.Quotehttps://www.vox.com/2019/3/13/18263811/trump-fake-melania-tweet-explained
"I have a birth certificate from Slovenia!.....We feel it is different from a birth certificate..."
Fetzer's done more to discredit JFK conspiracy theorists than any LN ever could. Addressed to CTs; Does Fetzer have any credibility left with you guys?
Off topic, but years ago I came across an exchange online between Fetzer and another paranoid which had him freaking out about his computer 'spying' on him. What had happened was that his computer had frozen, and all he had was a spinning ball onscreen. Well, that was a Mac simply slowed down probably trying to catch up due possibly to an overloaded hard drive. Kinda like the Windows 'blue screen of death' We MacHeads call the spinning multicoloured ball the 'beachball of death'
But what a poor excuse for a human being is this Fetzer
That's a coincidence, Jack White accused someone of exactly the same thing on the ED forum years back, he was another nutcase.
True story; When I first joined the ED, many, many years ago, I'll admit to being more than a little overawed when I saw Jack White was also a member, he was a bit of a star back then and I was a young and very naive CT. I sent Jack a PM saying how honoured I was to be a member of the same forum etc (God, I must have been a brown nose back then, lol) Jack posted back a very nice and polite PM but he included a list of about 20 other members whom he said I should avoid because they were really CIA plants! I was a bit taken aback, to say the least. That was the beginning of a very slippery downward slope between Jack and me, we eventually ended up bitter enemies. Like I said, a compleat nutcase.
http://quixoticjoust.blogspot.com/2012/05/
Saturday, May 12, 2012
Colossal Failure to Research Ekdahl
Who Was Edwin Albert Ekdahl, Stepfather of Lee Harvey Oswald?
The only father figure Lee Oswald ever had was the man pictured below, who appeared on the scene in New Orleans in either late 1942 or the first half of 1943, and disappeared from the Oswalds' life in mid-1948. Yet, Ekdahl has been almost totally ignored as a target of research before now.
Ekdahl's Overlooked Fort Worth Connections
The facts of his marriage to Marguerite Oswald were set out in a divorce petition filed by Edwin A. Ekdahl, signed personally by Fred Korth, whose office was at 812 Neil P. Anderson Building, situated at 411 West Seventh Street in Fort Worth.* Exploring that building's location really gives one a sense of who Ekdahl was during the years Lee Oswald lived in the same house with him. The best way to sense that connection is through Jack White's historic photos.
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-yC2GCnNecOU/T60FgQlPruI/AAAAAAAABOk/myErel7CRlc/s1600/electricbldg1930_Neil+P+Anderson.jpg)
Ekdahl's office, left; Korth's office, right
Ekdahl's office was nearby in the Texas Electric Service Company (TESCO) Building at 408 West Seventh--the same building which had housed FDR's Works Progress Administration during the depression years leading up to World War II. TESCO used the advertising agency, Witherspoon and Associates, where photographer Jack White was a vice president. White, intriguingly, served as a consultant to the HSCA concerning photo analysis and enhancement and has been an unabashed defender of the work of John Armstrong, author of the book Harvey and Lee, inspired by White's prior photographic work on Oswald. According to Dave Perry, White and Armstrong had in fact worked together "scrutinizing" Marguerite's files. White, at least, should have known, if he did not in fact know, that Oswald's stepfather, Edwin Ekdahl, had worked for one of Witherspoon's most important clients, the Texas Electric Service Company, located across the street for Fred Korth's office when Korth represented Ekdahl in his divorce from Marguerite.....
Jack and I used to exchange messages regularly back in the day, and on very friendly terms.
We used to message back and forth via email, until one day, he disagreed with an analysis I had completed on a section of a photograph taken in Dealey plaza.
He went all moody on me, saying that I shouldn't be analysing photographs of Dealey Plaza, as I had never been to Dealey Plaza.
I replied by asking him when he was going back to the Moon.
He never spoke to me again. :D
I notice many comments about Jack White in this thread. Jack truly did embarrass himself before the HSCA. His lack of knowledge about the photographic sciences was astounding. And yet, until Jack’s death, Fetzer referred to White as a “leading photographic expert” on the JFK event. Not unlike Groden who was undressed at the OJ civil trial.
| (https://www.jfkassassinationgallery.com/albums/userpics/10001/normal_digitalcollections11.jpg) | (https://sites.google.com/site/shotonelmclassicsiteview/_/rsrc/1535998814223/dealeyplaza/king-dealey-plaza-01.jpg) |
One claim that Jack White actually investigated was the Moorman-on-the-grass claim for the 2000 book "Murder in Dealey Plaza".
(http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/moorman/4Moorman_20in_20grass_20fina_2390243.jpg)
His claim was that Moorman would have to be on the street (she is "off the curb in Bronson" per White) to account for the line-of-sight in her photo. White essentially claimed a corner of the Zapruder pedestal would have to align with the corner of a window in the background. The only place White could get the alignment was when he duplicated Moorman's lens height as if she were standing in the street. But others ( Link to two-part article (http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/moorman1.htm) ) found the window corner alignment was not in the Moorman photo to begin with, and that standing on the grass as she is in Zapruder matches the line-of-sight in her photograph.Moorman's feet are not seen on the grass in Bronson because of the curvature of the lawn towards the curb. Probably sloped for rain drainage.
(https://www.jfkassassinationgallery.com/albums/userpics/10001/normal_digitalcollections11.jpg) (https://sites.google.com/site/shotonelmclassicsiteview/_/rsrc/1535998814223/dealeyplaza/king-dealey-plaza-01.jpg)
If Moorman had been standing in the street, she would have looked a lot shorter than the woman standing on the grass.
D'oh
-- MWT ;)
Reminds me of when the critics would defend what Garrison did to Shaw, or justify Robert Groden selling an autopsy photo of the President to be published on the front of a national tabloid.