JFK Assassination Forum
Off Topic => News - Off Topic - Weird & Wacky => Topic started by: Thomas Graves on April 12, 2019, 12:04:12 AM
-
Nah, on second thought they'll just take Assange's arrest by the Brits today as even more evidence of an all-powerful "Deep State".
LOL
-- MWT ;)
-
Check this out, Assange has only been charged so far with password hacking, 5 year sentence max.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/chapman/ct-perspec-chapman-assange-wikileaks-indicted-20190411-story.html
Okay, not my expertise but if someone "hacks" a bank account, takes out $500 or $5000, they ought to be busted for that.
UK wants to extradite him, at least, 70 MPs, to Sweden for charges he faces there that at the moment, appear much more serious. I always though, questioned the credibility of those rape charges and I believe the charges are for 2 different rapes.
-
...the many inquisitive "guests" (52 at the moment) who invariably show up on this thread whenever I've been posting on it for several minutes.
-- MWT ;)
And....
To all of my faithful followers --
...........
-- MWT ;)
Lol! @130 days later and this apparently less interesting thread has, wait for it................... 283........... views!
-
And....
Lol! @130 days later and this apparently less interesting thread has, wait for it................... 283........... views!
How about (YOUR? -- sarcasm) "Monster Plot" thread here, Mikey?
-- MWT ;)
PS How many views have you had so far on your thought-provoking "Monster Plot" tread at the so-called Education Forum?
Does James "Jumbo Duh" DiEugenio like it? (Silly question -- He loves everything that's pro KGB/FSB-SVR/GRU.)
-
How about (YOUR? -- sarcasm) "Monster Plot" thread here, Mikey?
-- MWT ;)
PS How many views have you had so far on your "Monster Plot" tread (sic) at the so-called Education Forum?
........
Thomas, I guess that the lack of interest would indicate, well, a lack of interest in the whole Bagely matter, about which you have been rambling, ad-infinitum, for years. The point is this: “The Monster Plot” was a fantasy that destroyed agencies, lives and careers; and Bagely was, as much, if not more-so than Angleton, responsible for the whole debacle.
-
Thomas, I guess that the lack of interest would indicate, well, a lack of interest in the whole Bagely matter, about which you have been rambling, ad-infinitum, for years. The point is this: “The Monster Plot” was a fantasy that destroyed agencies, lives and careers; and Bagely was, as much, if not more-so than Angleton, responsible for the whole debacle.
Michael,
Honest question: Do you work for ...
Aw, never mind.
-- MWT ;)
-
.....
PS How many views have you had so far on your thought-provoking "Monster Plot" tread at the so-called Education Forum?
....
This one?: http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/25944-the-monster-plot/
I just checked, 312 views in 13 days, with an approval and a thanks. That blows away, by far, your record on the 4 threads of yours that I just highlighted.
-
This one?: http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/25944-the-monster-plot/
I just checked, 312 views in 13 days, with an approval and a thanks. That blows away, by far, your record on the 4 threads of yours that I just highlighted.
Michael,
"You must be very proud of yourself."
Regardless, when I addressed "My Faithful Followers," I did so on my "Monster Plot" thread, and that's the thread I was, by definition, referring to.
Regarding your posting of HSCA perjurer and virtual traitor John L. Hart's pro-KGB propaganda piece at the EF, you're lucky that it didn't start out in some kind of "Off Topic" subsection, because if it had, it would have only about four "views" by now. LOL
Btw, how may times have you "bumped" it to the front, now?
Got anyone to argue about it, yet, you know ... to stimulate interest?
Maybe you can pay a "shill" to help you out in that regard!
-- MWT
-
Michael,
....
.... when I addressed "My Faithful Followers," I did so on my "Monster Plot" thread, and that's the thread I was, by definition, referring to.
......
-- MWT
Thomas,
Don’t your “Faithful Followers” follow you wherever you go? Don’t they follow you wherever you are posting?
No? ... That strange. It’s like they are, maybe, following the thread, and, maybe, not following you?, at all?
You know, there only two of us posting on that thread. It just might be that they aren’t following you, or the thread.
-
Thomas,
Don’t your “Faithful Followers” follow you wherever you go? Don’t they follow you wherever you are posting?
No? ... That strange. It’s like they are, maybe, following the thread, and, maybe, not following you?, at all?
You know, there only two of us posting on that thread. It just might be that they aren’t following you, or the thread.
Michael,
I'll rephrase it for you:
Palpable is the way your envy and trollish-ness appear to most members and guests, especially here in the "Off Topic" section.
I do get emails, you know.
I guess they found my address at the top of my JFKAD-EF "bio"...
Which is easy enough to find over there if you just go to the "Biographical Details" page, and in the upper right corner click "sort" for "most viewed" ...
-- MWT ;)
-
This is what a pro-Trump CTer extraordinaire, "Robert Wheeler," posted today at the wonky EF.
Thoughts?
.....
Here's the story that puts the pieces together. HUGE! Suspected ‘Whistleblower’ Ciaramella May Be CIA Spy Planted in Trump White House Identified as “Charlie” in Strzok and Page Texts!
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/11/huge-suspected-whistleblower-ciaramella-may-be-cia-spy-planted-in-trump-white-house-identified-as-charlie-in-strzok-and-page-texts/
It is interesting but it is still not necessarily the real story. Ciaramella is more than likely the "throw" to keep eyes off the Vindman brothers. (ie. Ciaramella is red meat for the pro-Trump blogosphere looking for someone to hang; they are literally looking.)
.
Ciaramella's the "Patsy". This thread started out as a discussion about Mark Zaid, Ciarmella and Vindman's lawyer. It should not be much of a surprise that he is "representing" Ciaramella to run cover for the larger franchise that the Vindman's are closer too.
.
That Ciaramella is now the patsy is more of an ad hoc effort compared to some historical incidents where a patsy was used. Since it is "ad hoc", there was not much planning and practice involved. It is failing already.
-- MWT ;)
-
Wheeler is suddenly a researcher? Lure him over here with this bait (Ms. T. Gabbard would suffice "on the hook," too) and Tommy can give him a piece of his mind, keyboard to keyboard....
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/26193-godfrey-rockefeller-bell-helicopter-and-the-world-wildlife-fund/
Godfrey Rockefeller, Bell Helicopter and the World Wildlife Fund
By Robert Wheeler, Monday at 09:36 AM in JFK Assassination Debate
.....
The "turds" intrepid Wheeler seeks/needs to attempt to "reinvent the wheel," are under his nose. Let's see if he ever glances down.... searches the forum he is posting on.
Raised Godfrey helicopter guy's first wife, Constance Hamilton, the one he took with him to Dallas,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_M._Vauclain#Personal_life
&
Raised Dr. Werner von Braun
(http://jfkforum.com/images/BellONeillDornberger061659.jpg)
&
John Train - JFK Assassination Debate - The Education Forum
educationforum.ipbhost.com › ... › JFK Assassination Debate
Jul 28, 2009 - 15 posts - 2 authors
The office Is occupied by John Train and Francis H. Cabot, financiers. .... Inc., and George D. O'Neill vice presi-[ dent of the Equity Corporation,
heymann's ''BOBBY AND JACKIE A LOVE STORY'' - History and ...
educationforum.ipbhost.com › topic › 14920-heymanns-bobby-and-jackie...
Oct 23, 2009 - 5 posts - 2 authors
Godfrey's first marriage to Constance Hamilton Wallace ended in divorce. He was then married to Margaret "Margo" Kuhn Rockefeller for fifty ...
JFk & Jackie : Were They Who Their Friends Were? Which Friends ...
educationforum.ipbhost.com › ... › JFK Assassination Debate
Aug 26, 2012 - 9 posts - 4 authors
(Replying to: http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php? ... Godfrey's first marriage to Constance Hamilton Wallace ended in divorce. He was ...
Cord Meyer and the Assassination of JFK - Page 2 - JFK ...
educationforum.ipbhost.com › ... › JFK Assassination Debate
Mar 9, 2006 - 15 posts - 6 authors
Godfrey's first marriage to Constance Hamilton Wallace ended in divorce. He was then married to Margaret "Margo" Kuhn Rockefeller for fifty ...
“Mary's Mosaic”: A litmus test of JFK research integrity - JFK ...
educationforum.ipbhost.com › ... › JFK Assassination Debate
Aug 3, 2012 - 11 posts - 1 author
Godfrey's first marriage to Constance Hamilton Wallace ended in divorce. He was then married to Margaret "Margo" Kuhn Rockefeller for fifty ...
Images for educationforum.ipbhost.c
-
Wheeler is suddenly a researcher? Lure him over here with this bait (Ms. T. Gabbard would suffice "on the hook," too) and Tommy can give him a piece of his mind, keyboard to keyboard....
The "turds" intrepid Wheeler seeks/needs to attempt to "reinvent the wheel," are under his nose. Let's see if he ever glances down.... searches the forum he is posting on.
Raised Godfrey helicopter guy's first wife, Constance Hamilton, the one he took with him to Dallas,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_M._Vauclain#Personal_life
&
Raised Dr. Werner von Braun
(http://jfkforum.com/images/BellONeillDornberger061659.jpg)
&
Tom,
Point being?
In 5,000 words or less, if possible.
-- MWT ;)
--
-
Tom,
Point being?
In 5,000 words or less, if possible.
-- MWT ;)
--
Considering how you've blanketed this area of this forum, are you the optimum advocate for "brevity"?
Wheeler is suddenly a researcher? Lure him over here with this bait (Ms. T. Gabbard would suffice "on the hook," too) and Tommy can give him a piece of his mind, keyboard to keyboard....
It is finally dawning on me, you are Trejo's mentor.... "Hoover directed a cover-up because he wanted to avoid "civil war," "WWIII" with the Russkies," whatever.
This was the beginning of "the end" for me, and I knew it when I read it....(Were you "off" during that period, or were you piloting this "plane crash". Or....are you T.....? LOL...)
Guest Tom Scully
Posted December 9, 2012
John, you've admitted Terri to your forum and now she's placed her OT accusations in a prominent spot on the internet, and just beloe your name. It is easy to see how Terri benefits, if getting an opportunity to pitch what she has linked to here is actually in her best interests to do, but how do you or the forum membership benefit?
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/19783-jfk-and-the-ku-klux-klan/?tab=comments#comment-263964
John Simkin Posted December 10, 2012
It might seem strange to you but I do not ask the question: "How do I benefit?" when I admit people to the Forum.
....as he sanctimoniously defended introduction of an obvious "spombleprofglidnoctobuns stain" of his own making....
-
Considering how you've blanketed this area of this forum, are you the optimum advocate for "brevity"?
It is finally dawning on me, you are Trejo's mentor.... "Hoover directed a cover-up because he wanted to avoid "civil war," "WWIII" with the Russkies," whatever.
This was the beginning of "the end" for me, and I knew it when I read it....(Were you "off" during that period, or were you piloting this "plane crash". Or....are you T.....? LOL...)
....as he sanctimoniously defended introduction of an obvious "spombleprofglidnoctobuns stain" of his own making....
Tom,
I'm afraid you're confusing volume with density.
Regarding Trejo, your thought-associative "beautiful mind" is revving way too high, once again.
Iirc, the only thing Word Twister and I had in common back when I, too, was a deluded conspiracy theorist was that David Sanchez Morales was caught on film scratching the back of his neck while Oswald and the three anti-Castro Cubans were being busted for disturbing the peace in New Orleans, or some-such thing.
I don't think he ever did agree with me that Duran's and Azcue's "Blond Oswald in Mexico City" was short, skinny, blond, very thin-faced KGB Colonel Nikolai Leonov.
As I recall, it didn't jibe with his Howard and Hernandez (or was it Seymour?) Escorted Oswald to Mexico City Theory, or with the God-like pronouncements of Bill Simpich, or ... gasp ... some-such thing.
I take my presumed status of "mentor" (to anybody) as a compliment, however, especially on such an arcane subject as The JFK Assassination.
-- MWT ;)
PS In my mind there's a big difference between Civil War and Nuclear war with the Ruskies.
I believe CIA and the FBI were worried about the latter, whereasTrejo apparently built his theory around Hoover's alleged fear of the former.
Your conflating the two (and your ascribing guilt to me by associating me with Trejo) in your attempt to put me down or "win" something is, in my humble opinion, reminiscent of the what Fox News and the Saint Petersburg Trolls are notorious for.
PPS Am I imagining this, or did you, a few years ago, accuse me of having conspired with Trejo to get you kicked out of the EF?
Wouldn't be surprised if I did, though.
Why?
Because I find you analagous to a "strange attractor" in a "chaos theory" kind of way, and to my way of thinking you exemplify Tinfoil Hat Conspiracy Theory practitioners ... well ... To The Max.
As Winston Churchill allegedly said regarding British journalist and probable KGB spy, Tom Driberg:
"He gives sodomy a bad name."
Sorry, Old Chap.