JFK Assassination Forum
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate => JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate => Topic started by: Denis Morissette on April 04, 2019, 10:17:17 PM
-
As far as I know, this is the first time it is available online, incredibly. I've received it today under the recommendation of Reuel Smith. I uploaded it on my website.
Of special interest:
Q "Can you say where the bullet entered his head, Mac??
Mr Kilduff "It is my understanding it entered in the temple, the right temple."
http://jfkassassinationfiles.com/Parkland_Press_1327BTranscript.pdf
-
Thank You for posting this Denis.
Also:
Q. Where did the shots come from?
MR. KILDUFF: They came from the right side.
-
Thank You for posting this Denis.
Also:
Q. Where did the shots come from?
MR. KILDUFF: They came from the right side.
Yes ....Thank you Denis.... There's no need to comment on this transcript, it speaks for itself......JFK was struck in the right temple and the shots came from the right front ..... and Mr Kilduff's account is substantiated by Clint Hill who said that he saw a bullet hole in JFK's right temple just forward of the right ear in the hairline.
-
As far as I know, this is the first time it is available online, incredibly. I've received it today under the recommendation of Reuel Smith. I uploaded it on my website.
Of special interest:
Q "Can you say where the bullet entered his head, Mac??
Mr Kilduff "It is my understanding it entered in the temple, the right temple."
http://jfkassassinationfiles.com/Parkland_Press_1327BTranscript.pdf
His 'understanding' huh
It was also his understanding that Kennedy was shot only once, and the guv in the side
-
His 'understanding' huh
It was also his understanding that Kennedy was shot only once, and the guv in the side
There is the LN standard again; If you say something that does not match the official fairytale, you must always be 100% correct about every detail. If you're not, you are automatically wrong about everything (*).
He was there, Chapman. You were not... you're the one second-guessing.
(*) Does not apply to DPD, FBI, Secret Service and WC.... they can be wrong about anything they like.
-
There is the LN standard again; If you say something that does not match the official fairytale, you must always be 100% correct about every detail. If you're not, you are automatically wrong about everything (*).
He was there, Chapman. You were not... you're the one second-guessing.
(*) Does not apply to DPD, FBI, Secret Service and WC.... they can be wrong about anything they like.
So Kennedy was shot only once, and the guv in the side. Got it.
-
Yes ....Thank you Denis.... There's no need to comment on this transcript, it speaks for itself......JFK was struck in the right temple and the shots came from the right front ..... and Mr Kilduff's account is substantiated by Clint Hill who said that he saw a bullet hole in JFK's right temple just forward of the right ear in the hairline.
Did the Parkland Doctors ever say there was an entrance wound in the right temple?
Did Kilduff ever say who told him that JFK was struck in the right temple or that the shots came from behind?
-
Did the Parkland Doctors ever say there was an entrance wound in the right temple?
Did Kilduff ever said who told him that JFK was struck in the right temple or that the shots came from behind?
Yes, more CTer nonsense. Here is my favorite:
Mr. RANKIN. Did you ever check to see whether the rifle was in the blanket?
Mrs. OSWALD. I never checked to see that. There was only once that 1 was interested in finding out what was in that blanket, and I saw that it was a rifle.
Mr. RANKIN. When was that?
Mrs. OSWALD. About a week after I came from New Orleans.
Mr. RANKIN. And then you found that the rifle was in the blanket, did you?
Mrs. OSWALD. Yes, 1 saw the wooden part of it, the wooden stock.
CTer translation: Marina saw some undefined object made of wood.
-
Did the Parkland Doctors ever say there was an entrance wound in the right temple?
Did Kilduff ever say who told him that JFK was struck in the right temple or that the shots came from behind?
Did the Parkland Doctors ever say there was an entrance wound in the right temple?
If they did, you would simply say they were mistaken, right?
It's not like you believe them when they described the wound at the back of the head, right?
-
Did the Parkland Doctors ever say there was an entrance wound in the right temple?
Did Kilduff ever say who told him that JFK was struck in the right temple or that the shots came from behind?
Can't you read??.... If Kilduff didn't have the information he readily told the reporters that he didn't know....But He DID tell the reporters that JFK was struck in the right temple.... So He must have gotten that info from a reliable source....
-
Did the Parkland Doctors ever say there was an entrance wound in the right temple?
If they did, you would simply say they were mistaken, right?
It's not like you believe them when the described the wound at the back of the head, right?
Did they?
Some of them described a wound to the back of the head and some did not. In this case as far as I know ( which is why I am asking ) none of them said there was a entrance wound in the right temple. These are the doctors that you and your ilk act like are infallible when they say something that you like.
So again did any doctors report that there was an entrance wound to the right temple? I would think ( could be wrong and will admit it ) that this actually works against the CK's and they can't see it which is not surprising.
It seems like someone told Kilduff that there was a wound in the right side of the head. That is basically all we can get out of this. I would not expect Kilduff or anyone else at the scene to understand entrance or exit wounds so what they say on that is meaningless. Zapruder also thought the shots came from the right because he saw the right side wound. . All we can take out of it is someone said there was a right side bullet wound.
You are welcome Martin. I was happy to read through the lines and let you know the best way to look at this. Anything else I can help you with?
-
Did the Parkland Doctors ever say there was an entrance wound in the right temple?
If they did, you would simply say they were mistaken, right?
It's not like you believe them when the described the wound at the back of the head, right?
You mean you don't know if they said it or not?
I thought you were interested in examining the evidence..
-
You mean you don't know if they said it or not?
I thought you were interested in examining the evidence..
Stop thinking. It'll only give you a problem trying to process the information and us a headache.
Btw, am I supposed to know before I examine the evidence? Wouldn't that make me just like you?.... Oh, only the thought of it.
-
Did they?
Some of them described a wound to the back of the head and some did not. In this case as far as I know ( which is why I am asking ) none of them said there was a entrance wound in the right temple. These are the doctors that you and your ilk act like are infallible when they say something that you like.
So again did any doctors report that there was an entrance wound to the right temple? I would think ( could be wrong and will admit it ) that this actually works against the CK's and they can't see it which is not surprising.
It seems like someone told Kilduff that there was a wound in the right side of the head. That is basically all we can get out of this. I would not expect Kilduff or anyone else at the scene to understand entrance or exit wounds so what they say on that is meaningless. Zapruder also thought the shots came from the right because he saw the right side wound. . All we can take out of it is someone said there was a right side bullet wound.
You are welcome Martin. I was happy to read through the lines and let you know the best way to look at this. Anything else I can help you with?
Right temple blow-out from a frangible bullet. Pretty hard to miss. So how did Oswald manage that?
(http://www.readclip.com/JFK/JFK_temple_blowout.jpg)
-
He was there, Chapman. You were not... you're the one second-guessing.
A result of constantly being up to his eyeballs in straw.... (http://www.russianwomendiscussion.com/Smileys/default2/deadhorsebeat_2.gif)
-
Did the Parkland Doctors ever say there was an entrance wound in the right temple?
If they did, you would simply say they were mistaken, right? It's not like you believe them when they described the wound at the back of the head, right?
There was also a hole in the back of the head. He was shot twice in the head. Where is the evidence?...It was repressed --the brain went missing, am I correct?
-
Right temple blow-out from a frangible bullet. Pretty hard to miss. So how did Oswald manage that?
(http://www.readclip.com/JFK/JFK_temple_blowout.jpg)
Hill said it was a small bullet hole....NOT a "right temple blow out".... And that's what Killduff said also.....A bullet in the right temple.
-
A result of constantly being up to his eyeballs in straw.... (http://www.russianwomendiscussion.com/Smileys/default2/deadhorsebeat_2.gif)
::)
You lot continue to desperately grasp at straws, as usual.
Kilduff was the one to claim that Kennedy was shot only once, not me.
-
Stop thinking. It'll only give you a problem trying to process the information and us a headache.
Btw, am I supposed to know before I examine the evidence? Wouldn't that make me just like you?.... Oh, only the thought of it.
It seems I'm a big headache to you lot, alright.
;)
-
Yes, more CTer nonsense. Here is my favorite:
Mr. RANKIN. Did you ever check to see whether the rifle was in the blanket?
Mrs. OSWALD. I never checked to see that. There was only once that 1 was interested in finding out what was in that blanket, and I saw that it was a rifle.
Mr. RANKIN. When was that?
Mrs. OSWALD. About a week after I came from New Orleans.
Mr. RANKIN. And then you found that the rifle was in the blanket, did you?
Mrs. OSWALD. Yes, 1 saw the wooden part of it, the wooden stock.
CTer translation: Marina saw some undefined object made of wood.
True to form, "Richard" cherry-picks what he likes and ignores the rest.
Mrs. PAINE - And she indicated to me that she had peered into this roll and saw a portion of what she took to be a gun she knew her husband to have, a rifle. And I then translated this to the officers that she knew that her husband had a gun that he had stored in here.
. . .
Mr. RANKIN. In Russia did you have a rifle or a shotgun?
Mrs. OSWALD. I don't know the difference. One and the other shoots. You men. That is your business.
LNer translation: Marina positively identified the C2766 Mannlicher-Carcano rifle in the Paine garage.
-
Btw, am I supposed to know before I examine the evidence? Wouldn't that make me just like you?.... Oh, only the thought of it.
If you were like him, you would just mutter "Dirty Harvey" over and over again to nobody in particular.
-
It seems I'm a big headache to you lot....
We lot? [or us lot]? Probably a pain in the backside to somebody along the way (http://www.russianwomendiscussion.com/Smileys/default2/popcorn_eating.gif)
-
?..
Getting rid of the lying narcissist was the best thing that ever happened to that group.
If he promises to explore and embrace treatment options, can we promise to wait for him to return, transformed?
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/insight-is-2020/201601/the-price-loving-someone-borderline-or-narcissistic
The Price of Loving Someone Borderline or Narcissistic
...and why it can take so long to recover.
Posted Jan 07, 2016.....
"That group" sure are lucky stiffs. The only upside from repeatedly taking it on the chin from an entrenched borderline personality
is that the chin feels so good when it stops, or at least when the tide is turned.
-
Denis , This Parkland Press Conference Transcript-Kilduff-1327-B is a diamond in the rough that would have gone a long way throughout the years of trying to get information on what happened to JFK . I'm surprised that this transcript has come to light . You can read this transcript and take from it , what it says . It is good when it can be talked about what happened to JFK and how it happened with the information that is brought forth .
-
-
Denis , This Parkland Press Conference Transcript-Kilduff-1327-B is a diamond in the rough that would have gone a long way throughout the years of trying to get information on what happened to JFK . I'm surprised that this transcript has come to light . You can read this transcript and take from it , what it says . It is good when it can be talked about what happened to JFK and how it happened with the information that is brought forth .
Thanks! The transcript was mentioned in Best Evidence.
-
Moricet kept two trolls in Alan and Iacoletti and banned the guy who cracked the Prayer Man issue...He's a fool...And he used hard core Lone Nutter Jim Hess to do it as a co-moderator...He's lying if he said he didn't because it's right there in the record I now can't see...
Sounds like a self-fulfilling prophecy.
-
A simple matter of a "Bullet Right Through the Brain".
(http://i959.photobucket.com/albums/ae75/garcra/kilduff.jpg)
(http://i959.photobucket.com/albums/ae75/garcra/jfktemple.jpg)
(https://oi959.photobucket.com/albums/ae75/garcra/groden.jpg)
-
A simple matter of a "Bullet Right Through the Brain".
(http://i959.photobucket.com/albums/ae75/garcra/kilduff.jpg)
(http://i959.photobucket.com/albums/ae75/garcra/jfktemple.jpg)
Thanks for posting Mac Killduff pointing to his right temple and saying " a bullet right through his brain".....
When he was interviewed decades later Killduff couldn't bring himself to be as honest as he was at Parkland on 11/22/63..... During the interview he tried lead the listener to believe the shots had come from high up in the TSBD ....but he also described the shots as being widely spaced....NOT closely grouped.
IN short....What Kilduff said during the interview is BS and it is not to be believed ..... ( His pension may rest on him keeping his mouth shut....)
-
Thanks! The transcript was mentioned in Best Evidence.
I've presented 1327-c in numerous forum debates.
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/pdf/md41.pdf
MD-41
B. Does that maa external, Doctor, closed? DR. CLARK: Yes. ... Page 4 - #1327- C .... Kilduff. Qc2d you, too. Q. Which roo3. ~2s this? What 5s't>e room Like? DR.
1327-c was "hiding in the LBJ library.:
http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/Weisberg%20Subject%20Index%20Files/A%20Disk/Autopsy%20JFK%20Parkland%20Hospital%20Press%20Conference/Item%2001.pdf
http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/Weisberg%20Subject%20Index%20Files/W%20Disk/White%20House/Item%2001.pdf
(http://jfkforum.com/images/Weisberg1976LetterWhiteHouse_1327c.jpg)
-
I've presented 1327-c in numerous forum debates.
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/pdf/md41.pdf
MD-41
B. Does that maa external, Doctor, closed? DR. CLARK: Yes. ... Page 4 - #1327- C .... Kilduff. Qc2d you, too. Q. Which roo3. ~2s this? What 5s't>e room Like? DR.
1327-c was "hiding in the LBJ library.:
http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/Weisberg%20Subject%20Index%20Files/A%20Disk/Autopsy%20JFK%20Parkland%20Hospital%20Press%20Conference/Item%2001.pdf
http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/Weisberg%20Subject%20Index%20Files/W%20Disk/White%20House/Item%2001.pdf
(http://jfkforum.com/images/Weisberg1976LetterWhiteHouse_1327c.jpg)
See 'Peter Noyes'