JFK Assassination Forum

JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate => JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate => Topic started by: Louis Earl on December 10, 2018, 10:15:43 PM

Title: The wounds
Post by: Louis Earl on December 10, 2018, 10:15:43 PM
I continue to be bothered about the descriptions of the president?s wounds.  The Zapruder film saw them; people standing on Elm saw them; Hill and Jackie saw them; the Parkland doctors and nurses saw them; Oneal?s employees saw them; the Bethesda techs, photographer and doctors saw them; Gawlers? employees saw them.  And yet there is so much disagreement among them as to what they saw.  What is the believable explanation for that?
Title: Re: The wounds
Post by: Oscar Navarro on December 11, 2018, 12:35:33 AM
Can't trust eyewitness testimony alone. It's better to corroborate it with photographic, X-Ray, and careful, extended examination by qualified persons. Even then questions remain.
Title: Re: The wounds
Post by: Rob Caprio on December 11, 2018, 04:55:40 AM
Can't trust eyewitness testimony alone. It's better to corroborate it with photographic, X-Ray, and careful, extended examination by qualified persons. Even then questions remain.

And yet, the WC didn't do this as they failed to view the autopsy photographs and X-rays. Why?
Title: Re: The wounds
Post by: Ray Mitcham on December 11, 2018, 10:57:16 AM
Can't trust eyewitness testimony alone. It's better to corroborate it with AUTHENTIC PROVEN TO BE ORIGINAL photographic, X-Ray, and careful, extended examination by qualified persons. Even then questions remain.

There, corrected it for you Oscar.
Title: Re: The wounds
Post by: Louis Earl on December 11, 2018, 06:20:33 PM
That's the rub.  I can understand that Hill's and Jackie's recollections might not be trustworthy, but the rest of the people who saw the wounds were quite accustomed to seeing wounds, on both the living and the dead.
Title: Re: The wounds
Post by: Bill Chapman on December 11, 2018, 06:54:26 PM
There, corrected it for you Oscar.

Are you the Thought Police? Are you Big Brother?

I suggest you keep your misrepresentations of what other posters wish to emphasize to the confines of your own reply.

PS: JohnI does 'correct' others people's post, but keeps these 'fixes' of his within the confines of his own reply.
Title: Re: The wounds
Post by: Ray Mitcham on December 11, 2018, 07:12:46 PM
Are you the Thought Police? Are you Big Brother?
No.
Quote
I suggest you keep your misrepresentations of what other posters wish to emphasize to the confines of your own reply.


Suggest away, Chapman. I couldn't give a rat's ass.
Title: Re: The wounds
Post by: Bill Chapman on December 11, 2018, 07:36:32 PM
No.

Suggest away, Chapman. I couldn't give a rat's ass.

Misrepresenation is the lifeblood of you trolls. But lets see where your arse lands if you ever try that on me.

Go ahead, make my day.
Title: Re: The wounds
Post by: Royell Storing on December 11, 2018, 09:40:25 PM

   HSCA sealed the Testimony of Robert L. Knudsen, and sealed the interview they did with Corpsman James C. Jenkins who handled the Body/Brain of JFK at Bethesda. Who knows what else has been Sealed that we are unaware of? They wanted the Images THEY provided to stand as the official record until ALL the  eyewitnesses that saw otherwise were 6 feet under.
Title: Re: The wounds
Post by: Louis Earl on December 13, 2018, 07:29:51 PM
I never thought much of the Best Evidence theory of body switching, primarily because I never thought Lifton solved the problem of when.

But . . . when I think of the tales of Robert Kennedy keeping JFK's brain I wonder if RFK knew the brain was proof of a shot from the front and he thought that keeping the brain was a trump card?
Title: Re: The wounds
Post by: Don Echols on December 17, 2018, 08:37:24 PM
Here is a question,people do not ask,why was a tracheostomy done on the horizontal instead of the veritcal,which is the way it's done.