JFK Assassination Forum
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate => JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate => Topic started by: Tom Scully on September 23, 2018, 02:47:34 AM
-
Hello Mr. William Wayne Whaley, why do you want this job?
Mr. Whaley, do you consider yourself an honest person?
Mr. Whaley, what is your date of birth?
Mr. Whaley, there is a claim your first born child and namesake, William Wayne Whaley, Jr. was abducted.
Why did you have no further contact with your son William after your wife, his mother Sylvia Patterson died in 1934?
Why does your son William claim a different couple are his parents?
Mr. Whaley, why did DMN newspaper reporter Hugh Aynesworth and others describe you as earning the Navy Cross
combat award for your actions in combat during the invasion of Iwo Jima by U.S. forces?
Questions above are prompted by contradictions presented in the post at this link.:
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,180.msg31732.html#msg31732
Virginia Davis, do you consider yourself an honest person, what is your date of birth?
w/f 16 (white female, age 16 on November, 22, 1963)
(http://jfk.ci.dallas.tx.us/01/0126-001.gif)
http://jfkassassination.net/russ/testimony/davis_vc.htm
TESTIMONY OF MRS. CHARLIE VIRGINIA DAVIS
The testimony of Mrs. Charlie Virginia Davis was taken at 9 a.m., on April 2, 1964, in the office of the U.S. attorney, 301 Post Office Building. Bryan and Ervay Streets, Dallas, Tex. by Mr. David W. Belin, assistant counsel of the President's Commission.
454
Mr. BELIN. Mrs. Davis, would you stand and raise your right hand and be sworn, please? Do you solemnly swear that the' testimony you give will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God?
Mrs. DAVIS. I do.
Mr. BELIN. Would you please state your name for the court reporter?
Mrs. DAVIS. Mrs. Charlie Virginia Davis.
Mr. BELIN. You are known as Mrs. Charles Davis?
Mrs. DAVIS. Yes, sir.
Mr. BELIN. Your first name is Virginia?
Mrs. DAVIS. Yes, sir.
Mr. BELIN. Where do you live, Mrs. Davis?
Mrs. DAVIS. Athens.
Mr. BELIN. In Texas?
Mrs. DAVIS. Yes, sir.
Mr. BELIN. How old are you?
Mrs. DAVIS. Sixteen. ....
Is there any record of either of the above JFK/Tippit assassination witnesses reliably answering the questions above?
Is there any record of either of the above JFK/Tippit assassination witnesses unreliably or ambiguously answering the questions above?
If you were an employer or responsible for hiring for your employer, how could you justify hiring Whaley or Davis,
in any capacity?
Seven months after she told DPD her age was 16 and two months after she testified under oath to the WC that her age
was 16, Virginia Ruth Wilbanks Davis celebrated her 16th birthday, June 24, 1964!
(http://jfkforum.com/images/VirginaWilbanksDavis1948.jpg)
-
Is there something here of relevance to the JFK assassination?
-
Only if you are relying on the testimony of known liars to be accurate.
-
Yes, those sinister teenage girls couldn't keep their story straight. By indicating that she was 16 when she was almost 16, she is obviously a "known liar" whose testimony in the JFK case should be suspect. This is particularly rich coming from Dishonest John who has been caught in numerous lies.
-
Yes, those sinister teenage girls couldn't keep their story straight. By indicating that she was 16 when she was almost 16, she is obviously a "known liar" whose testimony in the JFK case should be suspect. This is particularly rich coming from Dishonest John who has been caught in numerous lies.
...and yet you still haven't named a single one. Go figure...
-
Only if you are relying on the testimony of known liars to be accurate.
That would mean we can?t take the testimony of anyone. I don?t think Diogenes ever found a single person who matched his search criteria.
Most everyone has something they will lie about. Lying about one?s age is natural, if one was married at an age many would consider too young.
It is impossible to name a single JFK witness who has never told a lie without telling a lie.
-
That would mean we can?t take the testimony of anyone. I don?t think Diogenes ever found a single person who matched his search criteria.
Most everyone has something they will lie about. Lying about one?s age is natural, if one was married at an age many would consider too young.
It is impossible to name a single JFK witness who has never told a lie without telling a lie.
And when two witnesses repeatedly tell exactly the same provable lie what does that suggest to you Joe?
-
Only if you are relying on the testimony of known liars to be accurate.
Unbelievable what alternate universe do you live in?
By your standard there is no testimony anywhere that can ever be deemed to be accurate because like it or not after Jesus every single one of us has lied and you more than most.
JohnM
-
That would mean we can?t take the testimony of anyone. I don?t think Diogenes ever found a single person who matched his search criteria.
Most everyone has something they will lie about. Lying about one?s age is natural, if one was married at an age many would consider too young.
It is impossible to name a single JFK witness who has never told a lie without telling a lie.
Thumb1:
Exactly, it's like these CT's have never lived in the real World. And show me a women who doesn't lie about her age, when they're young they want to be old and when they're old they want to be young.
JohnM
-
Unbelievable what alternate universe do you live in?
By your standard there is no testimony anywhere that can ever be deemed to be accurate because like it or not after Jesus every single one of us has lied and you more than most.
JohnM
Yes, the notion that Dishonest John, the single biggest liar on this forum, would call out a teenage girl for indicating that she was 16 instead of 15 and a few months old is rich irony. And imagine some war veteran exaggerating his war record. I bet that has never happened in history. Obviously he can't be trusted to confirm that Oswald took a ride in his cab. All sinister lies but no one is suggesting a strawman conspiracy that would require some proof or at least an explanation. Just random citizens lying for no reason.
-
What ? So you don't believe Whaley and Davis were part of the conspiracy to frame poor Saint Patsy ? What's wrong with you ?
:D :D :D
-
Yes, the notion that Dishonest John, the single biggest liar on this forum, would call out a teenage girl for indicating that she was 16 instead of 15 and a few months old is rich irony. And imagine some war veteran exaggerating his war record. I bet that has never happened in history. Obviously he can't be trusted to confirm that Oswald took a ride in his cab. All sinister lies but no one is suggesting a strawman conspiracy that would require some proof or at least an explanation. Just random citizens lying for no reason.
Obviously he can't be trusted to confirm that Oswald took a ride in his cab.
This is another pointless exercise they accuse Whaley of lying or whatever, yet according to at least two of Oswald's interrogators, Oswald openly admitted that he caught a cab and Whaley's manifest says he went to the same street that Oswald lived on at about the same time that his housekeeper saw Oswald.
JohnM
-
That would mean we can?t take the testimony of anyone. I don?t think Diogenes ever found a single person who matched his search criteria.
Most everyone has something they will lie about. Lying about one?s age is natural, if one was married at an age many would consider too young.
It is impossible to name a single JFK witness who has never told a lie without telling a lie.
That puts you in quite a bind given that your case relies on witness testimony, in most cases uncorroborated witness testimony.
-
Yes, the notion that Dishonest John, the single biggest liar on this forum,
You still haven't cited a single lie. Nor will you ever.
would call out a teenage girl for indicating that she was 16 instead of 15 and a few months old is rich irony. And imagine some war veteran exaggerating his war record. I bet that has never happened in history.
So basically you know when people's testimony is accurate and reliable and when it isn't, because.....reasons. How utterly self-serving.
-
This is another pointless exercise they accuse Whaley of lying or whatever, yet according to at least two of Oswald's interrogators, Oswald openly admitted that he caught a cab and Whaley's manifest says he went to the same street that Oswald lived on at about the same time that his housekeeper saw Oswald.
"about the same time". LOL.
-
"about the same time". LOL.
Whaley said his time schedule wasn't exact and Roberts said about 1PM so yeah about the same time. Anyway it's all immaterial anyway because Oswald admitted catching a bus and a cab, this can go no further, it ceases to be.
JohnM