JFK Assassination Forum

General Discussion & Debate => General Discussion & Debate => Topic started by: Bill Chapman on September 13, 2018, 08:12:02 AM

Title: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
Post by: Bill Chapman on September 13, 2018, 08:12:02 AM
Not one person in this photo looks at Ruby as he approaches Oswald.
Everyone is focussed on the 'basketball', so-to-speak.

Ruby is indeed the 'invisible gorilla'

(https://s33.postimg.cc/r61zluqhr/ruby_approoch_oswald.png)

Title: Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
Post by: Colin Crow on September 13, 2018, 10:18:10 AM
Exactly Tony, again you prove the gorilla theory, Fritz didn't see Ruby but that doesn't mean that Ruby wasn't there.

JohnM

He probably did after the shot.
Title: Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
Post by: Howard Gee on September 13, 2018, 11:01:25 AM
He probably did after the shot.

Fritz didn't see Ruby before the shot because Studebaker and Day hadn't created him yet.

Don't ask me how Fritz's prints got on Ruby.
Title: Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
Post by: Colin Crow on September 13, 2018, 12:11:29 PM
Fritz didn't see Ruby before the shot because Studebaker and Day hadn't created him yet.

Don't ask me how Fritz's prints got on Ruby.

Not sure how to break this to you Howard but itís biologically impossible for two males to create another human. Also wouldnít it be Oswald's prints on Ruby in this analogy?
Title: Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
Post by: Colin Crow on September 13, 2018, 12:17:48 PM

But you are right about one thing, psychologists would have a field day going through the truly insane conspiracy posts that are regularly seen on this forum. Hehehe!

JohnM

Speaking of conspiracy......when do you think that Williams, Jarman and Norman conspired to lie to the authorities about Williams movements in the 15 minutes before the shots?
Title: Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
Post by: Howard Gee on September 13, 2018, 01:18:20 PM
Not sure how to break this to you Howard but itís biologically impossible for two males to create another human. Also wouldnít it be Oswald's prints on Ruby in this analogy?

Minor objections, my friend.

Can you prove two males can't create another human ?

How do you know Studebaker and Day didn't use their time machine to travel into the future and bring back advanced cloning techology to create Ruby ?

I don't know whose prints should be where, but that doesn't matter either because the prints were either read incorrectly and/or planted. Besides, isn't it obvious that Oswald might have pressed his palm into Ruby sometime during interrogation ?

Also can you explain why there isn't a single photograph of Ruby in the basement before he charges towards Saint Oz and ventilates him ?

Why no in situ photo of Ruby in the basement before he rushes Oz ?

C'mon man, it's obvious Studebaker and Day created Ruby.  8)
Title: Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
Post by: Colin Crow on September 13, 2018, 01:51:08 PM
Minor objections, my friend.

Can you prove two males can't create another human ?

How do you know Studebaker and Day didn't use their time machine to travel into the future and bring back advanced cloning techology to create Ruby ?

I don't know whose prints should be where, but that doesn't matter either because the prints were either read incorrectly and/or planted. Besides, isn't it obvious that Oswald might have pressed his palm into Ruby sometime during interrogation ?

Also can you explain why there isn't a single photograph of Ruby in the basement before he charges towards Saint Oz and ventilates him ?

Why no in situ photo of Ruby in the basement before he rushes Oz ?

C'mon man, it's obvious Studebaker and Day created Ruby.  8)

While we wait for JohnM......why not give us your best guess on the conspiracy between Williams, Jarman and Norman? When did they decide to lie?
Title: Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
Post by: Howard Gee on September 13, 2018, 03:30:59 PM
While we wait for JohnM......why not give us your best guess on the conspiracy between Williams, Jarman and Norman? When did they decide to lie?

Williams, Jarman and Norman conspired and decided to lie immediately after the assassination.

They did so because they felt guilty about causing the assassination.

How did they cause the assassination, you ask ?

Here's how...

Williams, Jarman and Norman accidently discovered the 3+ foot cheese sandwich that Saint Patsy had smuggled into the depository. Without any consideration for Saint Oz, each of them ate a foot of the sandwich and left nothing but a few crumbs for Oz.

Naturally, Oz was livid when he discovered his gigantic cheese sandwich had been stolen and devoured.

Oz was so ticked off that he decided to shoot all 3 of the cheese sandwich thieves.

But at the last minute he changed his mind and decided to shoot JFK instead.

The whole BRW story about eating a bone-in chicken sandwich is an obvious fabrication designed to cover up the fact that he was part of the cheese sandwich theft which ultimately resulted in JFK getting his melon blown off.

If they had only known how attached Oz was to his cheese sandwich and how grumpy he got when he was hungry, the entire assassination could have been avoided.

That's why they conspired and lied.
Title: Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
Post by: Bill Chapman on September 13, 2018, 05:50:39 PM
He probably did after the shot.

Careful you don't crash into someone (driving, riding a bike, walking etc) while looking at a pretty girl.
Title: Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
Post by: Bill Chapman on September 13, 2018, 06:49:39 PM
While we wait for JohnM......why not give us your best guess on the conspiracy between Williams, Jarman and Norman? When did they decide to lie?

What's that got to do with the OP?

Hijacker, GTF off my thread
Title: Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
Post by: John Iacoletti on September 13, 2018, 08:07:00 PM
Fritz didn't see Ruby before the shot because Studebaker and Day hadn't created him yet.

Don't ask me how Fritz's prints got on Ruby.

...and he has the gall to call other people trolls.
Title: Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
Post by: Howard Gee on September 13, 2018, 09:26:31 PM
...and he has the gall to call other people trolls.

It's called satire, Johnboi.

Get a life.
Title: Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
Post by: John Iacoletti on September 13, 2018, 09:36:33 PM
It's called satire, Johnboi.

Get a life.

It's called pre-adolescent posturing.  Anything to avoid discussing the actual evidence.

Get a life, indeed.
Title: Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
Post by: Howard Gee on September 13, 2018, 09:56:39 PM
It's called pre-adolescent posturing.  Anything to avoid discussing the actual evidence.

Get a life, indeed.

No, it's called satire.

Didn't realize Duncan appointed you as moderator.

And of course interjecting yourself into this thread to call me a pre-adolescent posturing troll is productive conversation and discussion of the actual evidence.
Title: Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
Post by: John Iacoletti on September 13, 2018, 10:18:25 PM
No, it's called satire.

Didn't realize Duncan appointed you as moderator.

Who's moderating?

Quote
And of course interjecting yourself into this thread to call me a pre-adolescent posturing troll is productive conversation and discussion of the actual evidence.

That's because you injected yourself into the thread with pre-adolescent posturing trolling...er I mean "satire".  But valid point,  you're better off just ignored.

(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTXjv_UvxQpp6bZaVsHhVhYm0Toxi9-wgiadllgOHjdkA1qbxApiw)
Title: Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
Post by: Howard Gee on September 13, 2018, 10:25:31 PM
Who's moderating?

That's because you injected yourself into the thread with pre-adolescent posturing trolling...er I mean "satire".  But valid point,  you're better off just ignored.

(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTXjv_UvxQpp6bZaVsHhVhYm0Toxi9-wgiadllgOHjdkA1qbxApiw)

Then just ignore me and get off my nuts.

Why is that so difficult ?
Title: Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
Post by: Colin Crow on September 13, 2018, 10:38:56 PM
It's called satire, Johnboi.

Get a life.

Howard, I know satire, Iíve worked with satirists, Iíve studied satire. Howard, youíre no satirist.
Title: Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
Post by: Colin Crow on September 13, 2018, 10:51:31 PM
What's that got to do with the OP?

Hijacker, GTF off my thread

As much as Howard's attempts at humour and your suggestion that the shooting of Oswald by Ruby relates to the gorilla experiment.
Title: Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
Post by: Bill Chapman on September 14, 2018, 08:21:52 AM
your suggestion that the shooting of Oswald by Ruby relates to the gorilla experiment.

Exactly. Going by the tasks given to IG testers, Oswald was the 'basketball' in the room. The 'invisible* Ruby' competes the relationship here.

*during his approach
Title: Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
Post by: Colin Crow on September 14, 2018, 08:35:53 AM
Exactly. Going by the tasks given to IG testers, Oswald was the 'basketball' in the room. The 'invisible* Ruby' competes the relationship here.

*during his approach

Selective quote with the effect to reverse the true intent......intellectual dishonesty duly noted.
Title: Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
Post by: Bill Chapman on September 14, 2018, 08:47:28 AM
Williams, Jarman and Norman conspired and decided to lie immediately after the assassination.

They did so because they felt guilty about causing the assassination.

How did they cause the assassination, you ask ?

Here's how...

Williams, Jarman and Norman accidently discovered the 3+ foot cheese sandwich that Saint Patsy had smuggled into the depository. Without any consideration for Saint Oz, each of them ate a foot of the sandwich and left nothing but a few crumbs for Oz.

Naturally, Oz was livid when he discovered his gigantic cheese sandwich had been stolen and devoured.

Oz was so ticked off that he decided to shoot all 3 of the cheese sandwich thieves.

But at the last minute he changed his mind and decided to shoot JFK instead.

The whole BRW story about eating a bone-in chicken sandwich is an obvious fabrication designed to cover up the fact that he was part of the cheese sandwich theft which ultimately resulted in JFK getting his melon blown off.

If they had only known how attached Oz was to his cheese sandwich and how grumpy he got when he was hungry, the entire assassination could have been avoided.

That's why they conspired and lied.

Wait a minute. I'm certain that Ozzie ate the top off the 36" sandwich in order to fit it into a 34. 8" size, so as to disguise it in case people might mistake it for a rifle.
Title: Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
Post by: Bill Chapman on September 14, 2018, 08:58:52 AM
Selective quote with the effect to reverse the true intent......intellectual dishonesty duly noted.

'As much as Howard's attempts at humour'
>>> BFD

Stop squirming. Howard's humour was not what I was addressing

Your ignoring the relationship between the IG concept of inattentional blindness, abundantly demonstrated in the Ruby approach, is duly noted.
Title: Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
Post by: Colin Crow on September 14, 2018, 09:06:53 AM
I can only assume you are unable to comprehend. I would ask you to remove the out of context quote before report to moderator.
Title: Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
Post by: Colin Crow on September 14, 2018, 10:32:48 AM
'As much as Howard's attempts at humour'
>>> BFD

Stop squirming. Howard's humour was not what I was addressing

Your ignoring the relationship between the IG concept of inattentional blindness, abundantly demonstrated in the Ruby approach, is duly noted.

Are you not able to discern the difference between Ruby shooting Oswald and the gorilla experiment? Letís count the ways.....for one Ruby is dressed like everyone else......so if you like it would mean everyone in the gorilla experiment were dressed in the same costume.....thatís a start. I can continue if you wish.
Title: Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
Post by: Bill Chapman on September 14, 2018, 03:00:31 PM
Are you not able to discern the difference between Ruby shooting Oswald and the gorilla experiment? Letís count the ways.....for one Ruby is dressed like everyone else......so if you like it would mean everyone in the gorilla experiment were dressed in the same costume.....thatís a start. I can continue if you wish.

LOL

THe whole point of the IG experiment again sails right over your head. That Ruby- Oswald scene demonstrates the concept perfectly.
Title: Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
Post by: Bill Chapman on September 14, 2018, 03:03:17 PM
I can only assume you are unable to comprehend. I would ask you to remove the out of context quote before report to moderator.

Go ahead, snitch...
Title: Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
Post by: Colin Crow on September 15, 2018, 01:21:56 AM
Williams, Jarman and Norman conspired and decided to lie immediately after the assassination.

Agree
Title: Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
Post by: Steve Howsley on September 17, 2018, 12:08:07 PM
Williams, Jarman and Norman conspired and decided to lie immediately after the assassination.

They did so because they felt guilty about causing the assassination.

How did they cause the assassination, you ask ?

Here's how...

Williams, Jarman and Norman accidently discovered the 3+ foot cheese sandwich that Saint Patsy had smuggled into the depository. Without any consideration for Saint Oz, each of them ate a foot of the sandwich and left nothing but a few crumbs for Oz.

Naturally, Oz was livid when he discovered his gigantic cheese sandwich had been stolen and devoured.

Oz was so ticked off that he decided to shoot all 3 of the cheese sandwich thieves.

But at the last minute he changed his mind and decided to shoot JFK instead.

The whole BRW story about eating a bone-in chicken sandwich is an obvious fabrication designed to cover up the fact that he was part of the cheese sandwich theft which ultimately resulted in JFK getting his melon blown off.

If they had only known how attached Oz was to his cheese sandwich and how grumpy he got when he was hungry, the entire assassination could have been avoided.

That's why they conspired and lied.

LOL

I began reading that in a serious frame of mind then burst out laughing.
Champagne comedy.