JFK Assassination Forum
The JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate => JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate => Topic started by: John Corbett on June 11, 2026, 04:38:18 PM
-
The discussion about whether JBC could have continued to hold his hat after being shot in the wrist, triggered a strange thought in my head. What if JFK had chosen to wear the Stetson they gave him that morning at the Ft. Worth breakfast. Would that have confused Oswald? He would have seen two guys wearing cowboy hats in the limo. Would he have figured out which one was JFK. Could it have caused him to hesitate? All theoretical of course. One of a number of unanswerable questions regarding the JFKA.
JFK was very self-conscious about wearing hats, hence his reluctance to don it at the Ft. Worth breakfast. He was rarely photographed wearing one. He and Ike wore top hats to his inaugural. There's a small number of photos of him wearing a Fedora. I think most if not all of those were taken before he became POTUS.
-
He was wearing a fedora when he had to skedaddle back to DC to deal with the Cuban crisis. Usually, he would hold one in his hands (while deplaning) instead of actually wearing it.
(https://img2.pixhost.to/images/8576/737777917_cmc_apstory.jpg)
-
Not a great look. Like me, JFK probably eschewed hats because he had excellent hair and knew his groupies didn't want to see it mussed (no, I don't have groupies, but all the women in the family do assure me that I have quite amazing hair; in fact, the head shot mostly likely would've just bounced off my hair).
(https://lisawallerrogers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/jfk-rice-festival-1959-hat.jpg)
-
He was wearing a fedora when he had to skedaddle back to DC to deal with the Cuban crisis. Usually, he would hold one in his hands (while deplaning) instead of actually wearing it.
(https://img2.pixhost.to/images/8576/737777917_cmc_apstory.jpg)
Now that you mention it, I do remember seeing footage of that. He donned a trench coat too. I believe he did that to bolster the cover story that he was heading back to Washington because he had a cold. They were still trying to keep the CMC under wraps until they decided how they were going to respond, although a number of reporters were onto the story.
JFK had another quirk besides carrying his fedora. He would often deplane with a hand in his coat pocket. The real reason for this is he had a cigar that he had not finished smoking. When the pilot of AF1 was preparing for landing, he would instruct the passengers to extinguish all smoking materials, an instruction JFK would simply ignore.
"It's good to be the king".
-
Not a great look. Like me, JFK probably eschewed hats because he had excellent hair and knew his groupies didn't want to see it mussed (no, I don't have groupies, but all the women in the family do assure me that I have quite amazing hair; in fact, the head shot mostly likely would've just bounced off my hair).
(https://lisawallerrogers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/jfk-rice-festival-1959-hat.jpg)
That is one really bad hat. No wonder he quite wearing them.
-
That is one really bad hat. No wonder he quite wearing them.
Could be worse
(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/6Yzqoutb7BE/maxresdefault.jpg)
-
JFK wanted to appear forward-looking, the new frontier and so on.
Fedoras, nearly required in the 1950s, suddenly dropped out of fashion in the 1960s.
To wear a fedora in 1963 would have signaled fuddi-duddiness.
JFK declined, even for a moment, to wear a Stetson, while in Dallas.
Having lived in Texas for a couple of years, I think a photo of JFK in a Stetson would have been a smart PR move.
I don't know why JFK did not doff the Stetson, at least for a photo shoot, in deference to Texas customs. JFK usually knew instinctively what was good PR. But perhaps Texas was terra incognita to JFK.
-
"What if".....
Benjamin Cole and Thomas Graves were real JFK assassination researchers who didn't flood the forum with topics of super uber inanities and unknowns that don't amount to a pinch of puppyshit in the final analysis, and super uber inanities that only their idle, navel gazing minds could dream up and actually be interested in, because it's clearly evident that no one else is.
Wow. Just finished more reading. Pure trash. You two need to up your game. I was responsible for getting you tossed out of The Ed Forum on your ear as well Graves.
If it's any consolation to you Graves, between you and Benjamin Cole, you write the much better stuff, but not better by much mind you.
"What if".....
Benjamin Cole and Thomas Graves were real JFK assassination researchers.
No worries. I can't imagine it either.
Two Ed Forum skeletons in my collection.
Graves and Cole.
Dear "Veronica Jayne Wheeler,"
In my case, how much did Vladimir Putin and/or Jim DiEugenio pay you?
-- Tom
-
"What if".....
Benjamin Cole and Thomas Graves were real JFK assassination researchers who didn't flood the forum with topics of super uber inanities and unknowns that don't amount to a pinch of puppyshit in the final analysis, and super uber inanities that only their idle, navel gazing minds could dream up and actually be interested in, because it's clearly evident that no one else is.
Wow. Just finished more reading. Pure trash. You two need to up your game. I was responsible for getting you tossed out of The Ed Forum on your ear as well Graves.
If it's any consolation to you Graves, between you and Benjamin Cole, you write the much better stuff, but not better by much mind you.
"What if".....
Benjamin Cole and Thomas Graves were real JFK assassination researchers.
No worries. I can't imagine it either.
Two Ed Forum skeletons in my collection.
Graves and Cole.
he he he
:D Thumb1:
If all the inanities were removed from this forum, there would be very little content. Most conspiracy theories are inane. They are composed by people who choose to ignore the evidence because they feel a need to invent an alternate reality to the one dictated by the evidence. The truth of the JFKA is not a multiple choice exercise. There is only one truth. Just because you don't like the truth doesn't mean you are entitled to a different one. The CTs have been at this for 62 years and they still haven't come up with a plausible scenario other than the one presented by the WC.
-
One wonders why Veronica doesn't post some of her "real" research and show us what it looks like? I don't know if someone named Veronica can have a hard-on (these days, quite possibly I suppose), but Veronica certainly seems to have a hard-on for certain folks. I would scarcely put Ben and He Who Shall Not Be Named Because He's On Ignore in the same boat. Besides, if "real" research were the criterion at any forum, let alone this one, the internet would go dark. Veronica appears not to grasp that internet forums, and especially JFKA forums, are Monty Python Skits.