JFK Assassination Forum

The JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate => JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate => Topic started by: Michael T. Griffith on June 03, 2026, 02:08:10 PM

Title: Passing of Former HSCA Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey
Post by: Michael T. Griffith on June 03, 2026, 02:08:10 PM
A few weeks ago, G. Robert Blakey, the former chief counsel of the HSCA, passed away. For years, the majority of WC skeptics condemned Blakey as "a sellout," "a CIA whitewasher," "a cover-up operative," etc. That began to change when Blakey realized and admitted in 2014 how severely he had been misled by the CIA during the HSCA investigation, and when Blakey then released a statement titled “The HSCA and the CIA: The View from the Top,” which Blakey presented at the 2014 Assassination Archives and Research Center conference.

I have long been a Blakey defender, arguing that, for all his faults, Blakey did an enormous amount of good to advance our knowledge of the assassination and to reframe the debate. It was a very big deal, a historic moment, when the HSCA formally concluded that JFK was killed by a conspiracy, that there were two gunmen and four shots, that there was a grassy knoll shot, that the first hit on JFK came at around Z190 (when the sixth-floor gunman's view of JFK would have been obstructed by the oak tree), that Ruby lied about how and why he shot Oswald, that there was movement in the sixth-floor window within two minutes after the shooting at a time when Oswald could not have been in the window, that Ruby's numerous phone calls to Mafia contacts in the weeks before the assassination could not all be explained as labor-related calls, that Silvio Odio's account was credible, that Ruby had significant Mafia ties, that JFK's back wound was nearly 2 inches lower than where the autopsy doctors placed it and that the wound was tunneled upward, that the WC failed to follow-up on leads that indicated conspiracy, etc., etc. 

Jefferson Morley wrote the following about Blakey's passing in a recent blog post:

Bob Blakey was a central, sometimes controversial, figure in the second official investigation of JFK’s murder, the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA).

Jim DiEugenio’s sensitive obituary in Kennedys and King traces the learning curve of the organized crime prosecutor who served as HSCA chief counsel in 1978 and wrote the Committee’s final report. That report found that Kennedy “in all likelihood” was killed by conspirators who could not be identified.

The Washington Post obituary illuminates how and why the deception of CIA officer George Joannides caused Blakey to change his mind about who was responsible for the assassination.

The New York Times obituary is misleading because it is outdated. It omits the Joannides story and its influence on Blakey, despite the fact that Times reporter Scott Shane reported on the CIA’s “cagey” Oswald story back in 2009.


James DiEugenio, a longtime Blakey critic who softened his attitude toward Blakey after Blakey changed his mind about the CIA's potential role in the JFK's death, wrote a largely favorable article to mark Blakey's passing:

https://www.kennedysandking.com/john-f-kennedy-articles/g-robert-blakey-1936-2026

Here is Blakey's 2014 statement:

https://share.google/LYbp2pCKzILMLxv0C

Most of the historic ARRB disclosures from HSCA sealed records would never have happened had it not been for G. Robert Blakey. It was Blakey who authorized the collection of those records and who ensured they were preserved for future release.


Title: Re: Passing of Former HSCA Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey
Post by: Benjamin Cole on June 03, 2026, 02:22:27 PM
MTG--

Thanks for a thoughtful review of Robert Blakey, with whom I traded a few e-mails, and for who I wrote one op-ed (regarding opening the JFK Records). 

Blakey was gentlemanly, intelligent, and skeptical--in all directions.

Within the JFKA research community, there is often a stance that anyone who is not 100% a full-blown CT'er, or a 100% LNT'er, is wrong and braindead (as both sides will affirm endlessly).

I suspect a very small JFKAC. But I recognize it is only a suspicion, not a fact.

Blakey was reserved, conservative, and would not leap to conclusions. He disappointed some CT'ers and LNT'ers.

As you point out, Blakey was appalled at the use of the CIA's use of Joannides to put the kibosh on the HSCA look-see into MC, NO and other matters.

That use of Joannides might also have obscured LHO connections to G-2.
Title: Re: Passing of Former HSCA Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey
Post by: Lance Payette on June 03, 2026, 02:22:57 PM
Right - the Mafia (my leading CT candidate) left no fingerprints at all except erratic loon Jack Ruby and his "Mafia ties," "Mafia phone calls," yada yada. Ya know, I DON'T THINK SO. I love whoever it was at a hearing who was asked "What would you say if I told you Jack Ruby was working for the Mafia?" and replied "I'd say the Mafia needs a new personnel director." Yeah. The Mafia at the level of Trafficante and Marcello did not deal with characters like Jack Ruby. Can we get a little respect for the Mafia, please?
Title: Re: Passing of Former HSCA Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey
Post by: Fred Litwin on June 03, 2026, 02:45:26 PM
Here is my obit for Blakey that includes two private emails he sent me:

(https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/FredBlakey.jpg)
Title: Re: Passing of Former HSCA Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey
Post by: Michael T. Griffith on June 03, 2026, 04:02:09 PM
Right - the Mafia (my leading CT candidate) left no fingerprints at all except erratic loon Jack Ruby and his "Mafia ties," "Mafia phone calls," yada yada. Ya know, I DON'T THINK SO. I love whoever it was at a hearing who was asked "What would you say if I told you Jack Ruby was working for the Mafia?" and replied "I'd say the Mafia needs a new personnel director." Yeah. The Mafia at the level of Trafficante and Marcello did not deal with characters like Jack Ruby. Can we get a little respect for the Mafia, please?

This nonsense is further proof that you have no business discussing the JFK case. Using your logic, one could certainly call David Ferrie an "erratic loon," yet we know that David Ferrie worked for Carlos Marcello--indeed, he was one of Marcello's personal pilots, among other things--but he was not a formal Mafia member.

The Mafia sometimes used disreputable people who had Mafia connections but who were not Mafia members, precisely to establish technically plausible denial.

The HSCA polygraph experts found indications in Ruby's polygraph results that he was lying when he denied being involved in a JFK assassination conspiracy.








Title: Re: Passing of Former HSCA Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey
Post by: Jarrett Smith on June 03, 2026, 05:13:35 PM
This nonsense is further proof that you have no business discussing the JFK case. Using your logic, one could certainly call David Ferrie an "erratic loon," yet we know that David Ferrie worked for Carlos Marcello--indeed, he was one of Marcello's personal pilots, among other things--but he was not a formal Mafia member.

The Mafia sometimes used disreputable people who had Mafia connections but who were not Mafia members, precisely to establish technically plausible denial.

The HSCA polygraph experts found indications in Ruby's polygraph results that he was lying when he denied being involved in a JFK assassination conspiracy.

Ruby flat out lied about being at Parkland talking to Seth Kantor, and he lied about walking down the ramp to kill Oswald.
Title: Re: Passing of Former HSCA Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey
Post by: Lance Payette on June 03, 2026, 05:32:00 PM
This nonsense is further proof that you have no business discussing the JFK case.

When MTG tells you your posts are "nonsense," you need to have that framed and put on the wall. It's sort of a Rationality Merit Badge.

Quote
Using your logic, one could certainly call David Ferrie an "erratic loon," yet we know that David Ferrie worked for Carlos Marcello--indeed, he was one of Marcello's personal pilots, among other things--but he was not a formal Mafia member.

The Mafia sometimes used disreputable people who had Mafia connections but who were not Mafia members, precisely to establish technically plausible denial.

The HSCA polygraph experts found indications in Ruby's polygraph results that he was lying when he denied being involved in a JFK assassination conspiracy.

Not just by my logic but by any logic one could call Ferrie an erratic loon. Unlike Ruby, however, Ferrie - who did indeed serve as Marcello's pilot - has no demonstrable connection to the JFKA. Because you live in Conspiracy Ozone, the equation is simply "Ferrie knew Marcello = Ferrie had a role in a JFKA conspiracy."

To establish technically plausible denial, one would not start with an erratic loon with underworld connections who made suspicious underworld-type calls in the immediate lead-up to the JFKA and then assign said erratic loon the absolutely critical role of silencing Mr. Patsy - a role that said erratic loon failed to accomplish before Mr. Patsy had been interrogated up one side and down the other. Makes no sense at all except in Conspiracy Ozone.

If the Mafia wanted Oswald dead, he would have been dead within 15 minutes - tops - of the JFKA. If he was a patsy for the purpose of pointing the finger at Castro, the only patsy role that makes sense, he would have been more useful to the Mafia alive than dead so long as he had no clue the Mafia was pulling the strings. If the Mafia wanted Oswald dead, the task would have been assigned to a pro who would have done the deed and vanished like mist, and that's all there is to it.

Because you live in Conspiracy Ozone where everything has to be as complicated as it can be made, regardless of rationality or plausibility, you simply cannot stand the thought that "obvious" characters like Ferrie and Ruby were not involved. Their obviousness - especially in the case of Ruby - is precisely why they weren't involved. You can't stand the thought that the murder of Oswald does not have to be, and almost surely wasn't, for the purpose of "silencing the patsy" (after he had already been interrogated up one side and down the other).

Simply MAKES NO SENSE ... except in Conspiracy Ozone. Having grown up in what was then a relatively small town controlled by Joe Bananas, I have a little more regard for the Mafia than to think they would allow Ferrie or Ruby to have any meaningful role in a Presidential assassination. This wasn't Louie the Knife and the Detroit Goon Squad - this was Carlos Marcello and Santo Trafficante.
Title: Re: Passing of Former HSCA Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey
Post by: Michael T. Griffith on June 03, 2026, 06:47:06 PM
This nonsense is further proof that you have no business discussing the JFK case. Using your logic, one could certainly call David Ferrie an "erratic loon," yet we know that David Ferrie worked for Carlos Marcello--indeed, he was one of Marcello's personal pilots, among other things--but he was not a formal Mafia member.

The Mafia sometimes used disreputable people who had Mafia connections but who were not Mafia members, precisely to establish technically plausible denial.

The HSCA polygraph experts found indications in Ruby's polygraph results that he was lying when he denied being involved in a JFK assassination conspiracy.

Just to follow up on this, two of the documents that Blakey's staff preserved for future disclosure were released in 2017 and reveal that Ruby had advance knowledge of the assassination and was in Dealey Plaza during the shooting. I discuss this in my book A Comforting Lie, from which I quote:

Two documents released in 2017 reveal that Ruby had advance knowledge of the assassination and that he was in Dealey Plaza during the shooting. The documents reveal that shortly before the shooting, Ruby invited a man named Bob Vanderslice to watch JFK’s motorcade with him and to “watch the fireworks.” Ruby met Vanderslice at the Postal Annex Building in Dealey Plaza before JFK’s motorcade entered the plaza. The two men then watched the shooting (10).

Ruby did not know that Bob Vanderslice was an informant for the Intelligence Division of the Dallas office of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). When Vanderslice saw news reports in early 1977 that the HSCA was going to reinvestigate the JFK assassination, he decided he should tell his IRS contact about the incident, and he did so in February.

The following month, March 1977, the chief of the Dallas IRS Intelligence Division sent a memo about Vanderslice’s account to the Dallas FBI office because he thought the information “might be helpful in the investigation of the Kennedy assassination.” An FBI agent from the Dallas FBI office interviewed the IRS agent who had spoken with Vanderslice. The Dallas FBI office then sent a detailed report on the matter to FBI HQ. Here is part of the Dallas FBI report on the incident:

Vanderslice told him [Vanderslice’s Intelligence Division contact] that on the morning of the assassination, Jack Ruby called him on the telephone and asked him if he would like to go to the Presidential Parade with him, and if he would like to “watch the fireworks.” Vanderslice said that he was with Jack Ruby and standing at the corner of the Postal Annex Building facing the Texas School Book Depository building at the time of the shooting. Immediately after the shooting, Ruby left and headed toward the area of the Dallas Morning News building, without saying anything to him. (10:5)

The Dallas FBI report noted that the IRS agent said Vanderslice was a reliable informant. The report also noted that Vanderslice’s undercover work involved gathering information on the “criminal element” in Dallas, and that he had known one of Jack Ruby’s nightclub strippers. (A Comforting Lie: The Myth That a Lone Gunman Killed President Kennedy, KDP, 2023, pp. 28-29)
Title: Re: Passing of Former HSCA Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey
Post by: Jarrett Smith on June 03, 2026, 07:02:11 PM
When MTG tells you your posts are "nonsense," you need to have that framed and put on the wall. It's sort of a Rationality Merit Badge.

Not just by my logic but by any logic one could call Ferrie an erratic loon. Unlike Ruby, however, Ferrie - who did indeed serve as Marcello's pilot - has no demonstrable connection to the JFKA. Because you live in Conspiracy Ozone, the equation is simply "Ferrie knew Marcello = Ferrie had a role in a JFKA conspiracy."

To establish technically plausible denial, one would not start with an erratic loon with underworld connections who made suspicious underworld-type calls in the immediate lead-up to the JFKA and then assign said erratic loon the absolutely critical role of silencing Mr. Patsy - a role that said erratic loon failed to accomplish before Mr. Patsy had been interrogated up one side and down the other. Makes no sense at all except in Conspiracy Ozone.

If the Mafia wanted Oswald dead, he would have been dead within 15 minutes - tops - of the JFKA. If he was a patsy for the purpose of pointing the finger at Castro, the only patsy role that makes sense, he would have been more useful to the Mafia alive than dead so long as he had no clue the Mafia was pulling the strings. If the Mafia wanted Oswald dead, the task would have been assigned to a pro who would have done the deed and vanished like mist, and that's all there is to it.

Because you live in Conspiracy Ozone where everything has to be as complicated as it can be made, regardless of rationality or plausibility, you simply cannot stand the thought that "obvious" characters like Ferrie and Ruby were not involved. Their obviousness - especially in the case of Ruby - is precisely why they weren't involved. You can't stand the thought that the murder of Oswald does not have to be, and almost surely wasn't, for the purpose of "silencing the patsy" (after he had already been interrogated up one side and down the other).

Simply MAKES NO SENSE ... except in Conspiracy Ozone. Having grown up in what was then a relatively small town controlled by Joe Bananas, I have a little more regard for the Mafia than to think they would allow Ferrie or Ruby to have any meaningful role in a Presidential assassination. This wasn't Louie the Knife and the Detroit Goon Squad - this was Carlos Marcello and Santo Trafficante.

Nobody knows for sure if they wanted Oswald dead, but once arrested he was a dead man. Ruby was bound by the Omerta no way he was going to rat anybody out. He stalked his target until the right time. Ruby and Ferrie were both intelligent men, not stooges as you suggest.
Title: Re: Passing of Former HSCA Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey
Post by: Lance Payette on June 03, 2026, 08:07:41 PM
Nobody knows for sure if they wanted Oswald dead, but once arrested he was a dead man. Ruby was bound by the Omerta no way he was going to rat anybody out. He stalked his target until the right time. Ruby and Ferrie were both intelligent men, not stooges as you suggest.
Ferrie was highly intelligent, Ruby not so much. Does omerta apply to Jews (Ruby) and guys from Cleveland (Ferrie), I wonder? Ruby was (1) an erratic little clown whom bad guys far less sophisticated than the Mafia would not have entrusted with anything resembling an assignment, and (2) in his small-time way, too much of a "Mafia red flag" to send to whack Oswald - on national TV in a garage crawling with police, no less. Sorry - I know it's almost irresistable, but it just doesn't work.
Title: Re: Passing of Former HSCA Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey
Post by: Lance Payette on June 03, 2026, 08:18:17 PM
Just to follow up on this, two of the documents that Blakey's staff preserved for future disclosure were released in 2017 and reveal that Ruby had advance knowledge of the assassination and was in Dealey Plaza during the shooting. I discuss this in my book A Comforting Lie, from which I quote:

Two documents released in 2017 reveal that Ruby had advance knowledge of the assassination and that he was in Dealey Plaza during the shooting. The documents reveal that shortly before the shooting, Ruby invited a man named Bob Vanderslice to watch JFK’s motorcade with him and to “watch the fireworks.” Ruby met Vanderslice at the Postal Annex Building in Dealey Plaza before JFK’s motorcade entered the plaza. The two men then watched the shooting (10).

Ruby did not know that Bob Vanderslice was an informant for the Intelligence Division of the Dallas office of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). When Vanderslice saw news reports in early 1977 that the HSCA was going to reinvestigate the JFK assassination, he decided he should tell his IRS contact about the incident, and he did so in February.

The following month, March 1977, the chief of the Dallas IRS Intelligence Division sent a memo about Vanderslice’s account to the Dallas FBI office because he thought the information “might be helpful in the investigation of the Kennedy assassination.” An FBI agent from the Dallas FBI office interviewed the IRS agent who had spoken with Vanderslice. The Dallas FBI office then sent a detailed report on the matter to FBI HQ. Here is part of the Dallas FBI report on the incident:

Vanderslice told him [Vanderslice’s Intelligence Division contact] that on the morning of the assassination, Jack Ruby called him on the telephone and asked him if he would like to go to the Presidential Parade with him, and if he would like to “watch the fireworks.” Vanderslice said that he was with Jack Ruby and standing at the corner of the Postal Annex Building facing the Texas School Book Depository building at the time of the shooting. Immediately after the shooting, Ruby left and headed toward the area of the Dallas Morning News building, without saying anything to him. (10:5)

The Dallas FBI report noted that the IRS agent said Vanderslice was a reliable informant. The report also noted that Vanderslice’s undercover work involved gathering information on the “criminal element” in Dallas, and that he had known one of Jack Ruby’s nightclub strippers. (A Comforting Lie: The Myth That a Lone Gunman Killed President Kennedy, KDP, 2023, pp. 28-29)

Quoting myself - the sincerest form of flattery - re the Vanderslice nonsense:

Let’s examine this “Ruby foreknowledge” CT bombshell:

1. Our hero was Robert Murray Vanderslice, born in 1926 and died (in Dallas) in 1979.

2. He was an IRS tax informant, focusing on bookies, from 7/23/76 to 2/18/77 (six months). He was paid $135 for his services and $2.89 for expenses.

3. His last contact with the IRS was on 1/24/77. The IRS special agent to whom he was assigned, Lawrence Sandri, said he had never mentioned Ruby or anything about the JFKA.

4. At a restaurant lunch with the IRS local Intelligence Division Manager, Arlen Fuhlendorf, early in 1977 (some 14 years after the JFKA), he started talking about stripper Candy Barr (who did have a non-romantic, non-employment relationship with Jack Ruby a decade before the JFKA).

5. This somehow led to a discussion of Ruby. Vanderslice told Fuhlendorf that on the morning of the JFKA, Ruby had contacted him to watch the motorcade and had asked if he’d like to “watch the fireworks.” In CT world, this remark can have no meaning other than Ruby’s foreknowledge of the JFKA.

6. They watched the motorcade together from a corner near the Postal Annex. Following the JFKA, Ruby left, without comment, for the Dallas Morning News.

7. At the same lunch, Vanderslice divulged that he had been arrested and incarcerated at the Dallas County Jail at the same time Ruby was there. As a jail trustee, he said, he got to know Ruby better – but he said nothing further about the supposed foreknowledge or motorcade incident.

8.  Fuhlendorf told the FBI that “as far as he knew” Vanderslice had been a reliable tax informant, but he did not know if he was truthful about Ruby. He initially reported the lunch conversation in a memorandum to the IRS national office for transmission to the HSCA, but the IRS returned the memo and told him to contact the Dallas office of the FBI. (The memorandum never surfaced.)

9. Vanderslice went to astounding lengths to avoid repeated efforts by both the FBI and IRS to contact him about his Ruby tale. Fuhlendorf thought he might have “been untruthful” or perhaps had “second thoughts” and had gotten “cold feet” after being told he might have to testify before the HSCA.

10. Because Vanderslice’s tale was inconsistent with Ruby’s WC testimony and that of a Dallas Morning News advertising department employee concerning Ruby’s activities on 11-22-63, and because Vanderslice was clearly avoiding both the FBI and IRS, the FBI abandoned further efforts to contact him.

11. On the last attempted contact, his wife said he was in Wichita Falls, “trying to make a buck here and there.”

Ho-hum, such is the stuff of which conspiratorial bombshells are made in MTG’s goofy end of the CT spectrum.

“Foreknowledge of the assassination.” BWAHAHA.  :D :D :D :D

Not exactly a major exercise in factoid-busting, I’ll concede, but an interesting 30 minutes of mental exercise for your intrepid Factoid Buster.

Minor addendum: When the Vanderslice tale surfaced with the 2017 document release, it was of course of considerable news interest. THE VAST MAJORITY of news outlets, including major MSM, described Vanderslice - in headlines, no less - as an "FBI informant." Sexier than "small-time IRS tax informant," I guess. More like "FBI non-informant," as it turned out.

Amusing as he is, it is ironic that Conspiracy Ozone characters like MTG are oblivious to how much damage they do to rational, intelligent discussion of the JFKA.
Title: Re: Passing of Former HSCA Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey
Post by: Benjamin Cole on June 04, 2026, 01:20:51 AM
LP--

Actually, I am not in the "Mafia did it" camp, preferring my narrative that the JFKA was a small conspiracy of LHO with two disaffected G-2'ers or Alpha-66'ers.

But, accepting the premise the Mafia did it (a view held by Blakey, no slouch), then having Ruby snuff LHO is plausible.

In this narrative, the Mafia somehow convinced LHO to participate in the JFKA, planning to wax LHO post-JFKA.

But LHO went AWOL post-JFKA.

OK, now what?

The Mafia had resources, but not infinite resources, and not enough to compromise the DPD i this matter. And limited time. How long until LHO spilled the beans? 

So, who could enter the DPD building and not arouse suspicion, and who was willing to wax LHO?

The number of candidates might have been very limited. Pretty much Jack Ruby.

Ruby had living relatives in Dallas, so...he had to be careful post-LHO waxing. 

Title: Re: Passing of Former HSCA Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey
Post by: Lance Payette on June 04, 2026, 01:11:27 PM
My threshold question is always, "Does that make any real-world sense?"

Hearkening back to the UFO video I watched yesterday, which was full of "crash retrievals," I have to ask about Roswell and all the rest: Does it make any real-world sense that exotic craft travel here from Zeta Reticuli or another dimension or the future and then crash like Piper Cubs in New Mexico thunderstorms and Norwegian fjords and whatnot?"

No, it does not.

With Ruby:

1. First, we have to believe the Mafia would have wanted Oswald dead. They would not, unless he had some inkling of what he was involved in. If he thought he was involved in a pro-Castro operation, anything he said could only be helpful in pointing away from the Mafia.

2. Next, we would have to believe that the Mafia - the Mafia - completely dropped the ball. They failed to whack him right there in the TSBD. Big Louie, who was supposed to give him the proverbial ride to nowhere, had car trouble and failed in his mission. They completely lost track of him between the TSBD and the Texas Theater. Or, alternatively, they wanted him dead but had no plan whatsoever - the Mafia?

3. Or their plan was Ruby from the get-go, which would be supported by the calls Ruby supposedly made before the JFKA. Everyone who knew Ruby said he was an erratic, impulsive little character. His only conceivable positive would be that he was known to the police. If being known to the police was his big positive, that would suggest he wasn't recruited until Oswald was in custody. I simply can't think of any plausible reason the Mafia - the Mafia - would recruit a loose cannon like Ruby unless they were in a state of absolute desperation because Oswald was in custody and knew something he might reveal.

4. But wait, Ruby didn't get the job done until Oswald had been in custody and under intense interrogation for hours and hours. If Ruby had shot Oswald on Friday night, when he had an opportunity, we might at least have something to talk about. But he didn't.

5. No, he didn't, and now we have to bring the DPD into the conspiracy to account for the fantastically unlikely split-second timing of the supposed hit on Oswald. If the Mafia had someone on the inside of the DPD, they didn't need Ruby to whack Oswald. Just the DPD guy to say, "He tried to grab my gun and I shot him. Sorry." Anyway, Ruby does absolutely nothing until minutes before the shooting that looks anything like a guy planning to shoot Oswald. Nevertheless, with split-second timing he is allowed into the garage, which is crawling with police and reporters, and semi-miraculously manages to get off one shot. At least while he remains in his right mind, he never says anything suggesting he was on a mission.The entire scenario is just fantastically unlikely and un-Mafia like - indeed un-any-conspiracy-like.

Even if there was a conspiracy, I think Ruby was an outlier who did what he said he did and what the LN narrative said he did.

Because he was kind of a Mafia wannabe, and because he actually did manage to whack Oswald, everyone is entranced by those two bookends and determined to fit him into their conspiracy. But it just doesn't work out here in the real world. It ... just ... makes ... no ... sense. IMO, Ruby is a red herring and just a distraction. He's the "crash retrieval" of the JFKA!  :D
Title: Re: Passing of Former HSCA Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey
Post by: Michael T. Griffith on June 04, 2026, 02:52:27 PM
For those who may be new to the JFK case and know little or nothing about G. Robert Blakey, I would recommend that you listen to his extensive 1980 interview with Milt Rosenberg:

(part 1)
(part 2)

In this interview, you'll hear Blakey roundly, strongly reject the single-assassin scenario.

I also recommend that you watch Blakey's 1981 debate with former WC attorney David Belin and his 2018 debate with former WC attorney Howard Willens:

Debate with Belin

Debate with Willens
Title: Re: Passing of Former HSCA Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey
Post by: Michael T. Griffith on June 05, 2026, 02:25:07 PM
As you listen to Blakey's interview with Rosenberg, you will hear how passionate he was about the case for conspiracy. He was certain that JFK was killed by a conspiracy, that there was a grassy knoll gunman, that Ruby shot Oswald on orders from the Mafia, and that the lone-gunman theory was untenable. However, you would never know this to read the scathing, draconian attacks on Blakey made by ultra-liberal conspiracy theorists, such as Joan Mellen and Len Osanic.

In his interview with Rosenberg, Blakey said that it was "a possibility" that some CIA-trained anti-Castro Cubans and some of their CIA handlers were involved in the assassination and that there were some "deeply suspicious circumstances" involving those individuals. But, Blakey did not believe the evidence established this scenario beyond the point of suspicion.

Blakey believed that the only scenario that was established beyond the point of suspicion was the Mafia scenario, and for this he was excoriated by both ultra-liberal conspiracy theorists and Warren Commission apologists.

Thankfully, there have been and still are plenty of pro-conspiracy JFKA researchers who are not ultra-liberal and/or who do not buy into the 9/11 Truther craziness and who do not rely on L. Fletcher Prouty's crackpot claims. These researchers include Jeff Sundberg, David Scheim, Anthony Summers, David Mantik, Harold Weisberg, Greg Doudna, Mark Shaw, Richard Mahoney, John H. Davis, Seth Kantor, Gary Cornwell, Stewart Galanor, Gaeton Fonzi, and Lamar Waldron, to name a few.

Once again, here are the links to Blakey's two-part interview with Rosenberg:

(part 1)
(part 2)
Title: Re: Passing of Former HSCA Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey
Post by: John Corbett on June 05, 2026, 02:33:00 PM
As you listen to Blakey's interview with Rosenberg, you will hear how passionate he was about the case for conspiracy.


Passion does not equate to correctness. There are people who are passionately wrong about many things. I see examples of that every day on this forum.

What I don't ever see from these passionate CTs is credible evidence to support their beliefs.
Title: Re: Passing of Former HSCA Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey
Post by: Michael T. Griffith on June 19, 2026, 04:31:35 PM
Another thing that Blakey's pro-conspiracy critics overlook is that Blakey could only go as far as the committee would let him go. The committee members were the ones who had the final say on the conduct of the investigation, on the wording of the final report, and on which documents were sealed and which were not.

For example, the Final Draft Report, which Blakey approved, then underwent revision, including by the CIA. The final published version watered down many valid statements in the Final Draft Report. For instance, the Final Draft Report said the following about the evidence of Mafia involvement:

There is solid evidence that Hoffa, Marcello, and Trafficante — three of the most important targets for criminal prosecution by the Kennedy administration — had discussions with their subordinates about murdering President Kennedy. Associates of Hoffa, Trafficante, and Marcello were in direct contact with Jack Ruby, the Dallas nightclub owner who killed the "lone assassin" of the president. (Final Draft Report, HSCA, p. 274)

This was a perfectly valid, factual statement, as many scholars have proved (e.g., Dr. Richard Mahoney, Dr. David Kaiser, Dr. David Scheim, and Lamar Waldron). But, this blunt statement did not make it into the published report.

Because the committee members could not stomach a fifth shot and a third gunman, Blakey insisted that the apparent gunshot impulse pattern at 140.3 on the dictabelt be ruled a false alarm, even though it passed the echo-delay matching test, and even though 8 of its 10 impulses matched the impulses of one of the Dealey Plaza test shots.

The problem was that this impulse pattern occurs 1.05 seconds after the 139.27 impulse pattern, and the alleged murder weapon simply could not have been fired that quickly. Thus, this shot would have had to be fired by another gunman shooting from behind (possibly from the nearby Dal-Tex Building or from another window on the sixth floor, keeping in mind that several witnesses reported seeing two men on the sixth floor shortly before the shooting).




Title: Re: Passing of Former HSCA Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey
Post by: Kevin Balch on June 20, 2026, 05:39:24 PM
Another thing that Blakey's pro-conspiracy critics overlook is that Blakey could only go as far as the committee would let him go. The committee members were the ones who had the final say on the conduct of the investigation, on the wording of the final report, and on which documents were sealed and which were not.

For example, the Final Draft Report, which Blakey approved, then underwent revision, including by the CIA. The final published version watered down many valid statements in the Final Draft Report. For instance, the Final Draft Report said the following about the evidence of Mafia involvement:

There is solid evidence that Hoffa, Marcello, and Trafficante — three of the most important targets for criminal prosecution by the Kennedy administration — had discussions with their subordinates about murdering President Kennedy. Associates of Hoffa, Trafficante, and Marcello were in direct contact with Jack Ruby, the Dallas nightclub owner who killed the "lone assassin" of the president. (Final Draft Report, HSCA, p. 274)

This was a perfectly valid, factual statement, as many scholars have proved (e.g., Dr. Richard Mahoney, Dr. David Kaiser, Dr. David Scheim, and Lamar Waldron). But, this blunt statement did not make it into the published report.

Because the committee members could not stomach a fifth shot and a third gunman, Blakey insisted that the apparent gunshot impulse pattern at 140.3 on the dictabelt be ruled a false alarm, even though it passed the echo-delay matching test, and even though 8 of its 10 impulses matched the impulses of one of the Dealey Plaza test shots.

The problem was that this impulse pattern occurs 1.05 seconds after the 139.27 impulse pattern, and the alleged murder weapon simply could not have been fired that quickly. Thus, this shot would have had to be fired by another gunman shooting from behind (possibly from the nearby Dal-Tex Building or from another window on the sixth floor, keeping in mind that several witnesses reported seeing two men on the sixth floor shortly before the shooting).

If the motorcycle with the stuck open mike was not at the required location at the time required, the timing of impulses or cross talk is irrelevant. The photographic evidence shows no motorcycle as required by the acoustics evidence. And if you go on to claim the photographic evidence was altered,  then acoustic evidence is still meaningless because the impulses were matched to the Zapruder film.
Title: Re: Passing of Former HSCA Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey
Post by: Michael T. Griffith on June 21, 2026, 01:07:05 AM
If the motorcycle with the stuck open mike was not at the required location at the time required, the timing of impulses or cross talk is irrelevant. The photographic evidence shows no motorcycle as required by the acoustics evidence.

Not true. I would refer you to Dr. Donald Thomas's extensive research on this issue. The photographic evidence is not a complete, second-by-second record of the events in Dealey Plaza, but Dr. Thomas makes a strong case that McClain was in the right position to have been in position to record the sounds on the dictabelt.

The Dealey Plaza site test done by the BBN scientists proved that the dictabelt was recorded during the assassination. Even the NRC/NAS panel concluded there was a 93% chance that the timing-movement correlations identified by the BBN scientists between the dictabelt impulses and the test-firing impulses occurred because the dictabelt was recorded during the assassination.

Have you read the HSCA materials on the acoustical evidence? How about Dr. Josiah Thompson's extensive discussion on the new developments from new research into the acoustical evidence done at BBN in 2019-2020 in his 2021 book Last Second in Dallas? His two chapters and appendices on the acoustical evidence total 114 pages. Dr. Thompson also spends considerable time on the issue of which patrol bike's mic recorded the impulse patterns on the dictabelt--he, too, makes a strong case that McClain's mic recorded those sounds.

And if you go on to claim the photographic evidence was altered, then acoustic evidence is still meaningless because the impulses were matched to the Zapruder film.

This is an overstatement and an oversimplification. There was disagreement among the HSCA experts about matching the gunshot impulses with events in the Zapruder film. Furthermore, as I have explained in other threads, the dictabelt did not necessarily record all of the shots fired in Dealey Plaza for two possible reasons: shots could have been fired several feet away from a window and/or a silencer could have been used. The acoustical scientists noted that if a gunman fired 6-8 feet back from a window, the dictabelt probably would not have recorded the sound.

Also, we need to keep in mind that because of restrictions imposed by the committee, the BBN test firing in Dealey Plaza was limited to the sixth-floor window and the grassy knoll. If shots had been fired from one or two of the lower floors of the Dal-Tex Building or the County Records Building, more dictabelt impulse patterns may have been matched with test-firing impulse patterns.

If anyone is interested in an extensive introduction to the acoustical evidence, here's the link to my article "The HSCA's Acoustical Evidence: Proof of a Second Gunman":

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KvdvH8gTqFgMn-2vTI5ppg_egWxRKg9U/view.

Title: Re: Passing of Former HSCA Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey
Post by: Benjamin Cole on June 21, 2026, 01:22:45 AM
MTG--

But what are the links between LHO and the Mob?

Senator Schweiker was correct when he said "the fingerprints of intelligence" are all around LHO.

LHO in Atsugi, then considered an asset by the KGB chief in Minsk, then meeting with KGB'ers in MC, possibly with G-2'ers in MC, and in N.O. In N.O., LHO appeared to be under CIA surveillance.

On the Mob side, Lee Harvey Oswald’s uncle in New Orleans was Charles "Dutz" Murret. But there is no indication LHO became "mobbed up."

There is no history of LHO running Mob errands, smuggling for the Mob, etc.

Blakey was a smart guy, but he was also a lifelong mob-hunter, the author of the RICO act.

Do you think that biased Blakey?




Title: Re: Passing of Former HSCA Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey
Post by: Michael T. Griffith on June 21, 2026, 02:00:07 AM
MTG--

But what are the links between LHO and the Mob?

David Ferrie was a Marcello operative. Oswald had relatives who were in the Mafia. There is decent evidence Oswald and Ruby knew each other, and Ruby had all kinds of Mafia ties. However, I don't think the Mafia was controlling Oswald. I think the Mafia's main role was killing Oswald and aiding in the cover-up in Dallas, New Orleans, and Miami.

Senator Schweiker was correct when he said "the fingerprints of intelligence" are all around LHO.

LHO in Atsugi, then considered an asset by the KGB chief in Minsk, then meeting with KGB'ers in MC, possibly with G-2'ers in MC, and in N.O. In N.O., LHO appeared to be under CIA surveillance.

Oswald was an intelligence operative, at the very least. He was definitely working in intelligence in the Marine Corps. I think it's obvious he was a false defector. 

On the Mob side, Lee Harvey Oswald’s uncle in New Orleans was Charles "Dutz" Murret. But there is no indication LHO became "mobbed up." There is no history of LHO running Mob errands, smuggling for the Mob, etc.

Murret, plus Ferrie and Ruby. But, yes, I agree that he was not a Mafia asset.

Blakey was a smart guy, but he was also a lifelong mob-hunter, the author of the RICO act. Do you think that biased Blakey?

But remember that Blakey completely changed his mind about possible CIA involvement in 2014, after he learned how badly the CIA had misled the HSCA. See his 2014 statement “The HSCA and the CIA: The View from the Top."

Quote
Quote from: Lance Payette:
But wait, Ruby didn't get the job done until Oswald had been in custody and under intense interrogation for hours and hours. If Ruby had shot Oswald on Friday night, when he had an opportunity, we might at least have something to talk about. But he didn't.

This is what happens when you deign to try to engage on the evidence.

Ruby started stalking Oswald on Friday night. Gee, why do you suppose he did that? He was supposed to shoot Oswald on Friday night when Oswald was talking with reporters. He was in the room and had a gun on him, but he backed out. Later, he tried to warn the DPD that Oswald would be killed, but they ignored him. The HSCA concluded that Ruby lied about his whereabouts that weekend, lied about how he entered the basement, and lied about why he killed Oswald. The HSCA's polygraph experts found indications that Ruby was lying on his polygraph when he denied aiding Oswald in the assassination:

In fact, the reactions to the preceding question--(Did you assist Oswald in the assassination?)--showed the largest valid GSR [galvanic skin response] reaction in test series No. 1. In addition, there is a constant suppression of breathing and a rise in blood pressure at the time of this crucial relevant question. From this test, it appeared to the panel that Ruby was possibly lying when answering "no" to the question, "Did you assist Oswald in the assassination?" This is contrary to Herndon's opinion that Ruby was truthful when answering that question. (8 HSCA 217-218)

Ruby was a nervous wreck before he heard that Oswald had died. He was visibly relieved when he heard the news of Oswald's death. Clearly, Ruby was worried about the consequences if Oswald lived.

Two documents released in 2017 reveal that Ruby knew about the assassination in advance and that he was in Dealey Plaza during the shooting. The documents reveal that shortly before the shooting, Ruby invited a man named Bob Vanderslice to watch JFK’s motorcade with him and to “watch the fireworks.” Ruby did not know that Vanderslice was an informant for the Intelligence Division of the Dallas office of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). When Vanderslice saw news reports in early 1977 that the HSCA was going to reinvestigate the JFK assassination, he decided he should tell his IRS contact about the incident, and he did so in February.

The following month, March 1977, the chief of the Dallas IRS Intelligence Division sent a memo about Vanderslice’s account to the Dallas FBI office. An FBI agent from the Dallas FBI office interviewed the IRS agent who had spoken with Vanderslice. The Dallas FBI office then sent a detailed report on the matter to FBI HQ. Here is part of the Dallas FBI report on the incident:

Vanderslice told him [Vanderslice’s Intelligence Division contact] that on the morning of the assassination, Jack Ruby called him on the telephone and asked him if he would like to go to the Presidential Parade with him, and if he would like to “watch the fireworks.” Vanderslice said that he was with Jack Ruby and standing at the corner of the Postal Annex Building facing the Texas School Book Depository building at the time of the shooting. Immediately after the shooting, Ruby left and headed toward the area of the Dallas Morning News building, without saying anything to him.

The Dallas FBI report noted that the IRS agent said Vanderslice was a reliable informant. The report also noted that Vanderslice’s undercover work involved gathering info on the “criminal element” in Dallas, and that he had known one of Jack Ruby’s nightclub strippers.




Title: Re: Passing of Former HSCA Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey
Post by: Benjamin Cole on June 22, 2026, 01:22:28 AM
MTG--

You make good points.

True, LHO attended the air-school run by Ferrie. But after that, no firm evidence they knew each other.

I have to concede, Ruby was a low-level mob guy, who had run guns to Cuba.

Ruby waxing LHO remains a fishy event.
Title: Re: Passing of Former HSCA Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey
Post by: Michael T. Griffith on June 22, 2026, 06:17:18 PM
MTG--

You make good points.

True, LHO attended the air-school run by Ferrie. But after that, no firm evidence they knew each other.

Actually, we have good evidence that they associated with each other long after they met in the Civil Air Patrol. See the research of the HSCA, Dr. David Kaiser, Anthony Summers, Dr. David Scheim, Lamar Waldron, etc. etc.

I have to concede, Ruby was a low-level mob guy, who had run guns to Cuba.

He did a lot more than just run guns to Cuba, although that was no small thing.

Ruby waxing LHO remains a fishy event.

It was clearly a Mob hit to silence a major loose end.
Title: Re: Passing of Former HSCA Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey
Post by: Lance Payette on June 22, 2026, 08:11:01 PM
It was clearly a Mob hit to silence a major loose end.

Sigh.

This makes no sense from any angle. Let’s put on our rational-thinking beanies:

1. Team A – think “Mission Impossible” – manages to alter JFK’s body, the Z film, the autopsy photos and X-rays and God knows what else the very night of the JFKA. Wow, these folks were pros!

2. Team B – think Carlos, Curly, Larry and Moe – cannot manage its little task of whacking the patsy at any time between 12:31 PM on November 22 and 11:20 AM on November 24. Even then, the best Team B can do is have him whacked on national TV, while surrounded by police and reporters, using a “hit man” with an erratic and volatile personality and more red flags than the Kremlin, so even your cousin Fudsy the potato farmer is screaming “Dat hadda be a Mafia hit, dood!” On top of which, Team B can’t even arrange for its “hit man” to be silenced then and there by a police revolver, which pretty much defeats the purpose of silencing the patsy since the “hit man” is nuttier and less reliable than the patsy.

Geniuses at steps 1-3-5-7-9, bumbling fools at steps 2-4-6-8-10. Mission Impossible and the Three Stooges.

Only in the lunatic fringe of Conspiracy World occupied by MTG and his ilk does this MAKE ANY SENSE. MTG just wants conspiracy factoids – they can be completely irreconcilable (as they are) and collectively make no sense whatsoever (as they don’t).

Plausibility, people, plausibility. Let this be your motto.

Mr. Niederwacky at the Ed Forum seemed to suggest in a recent post that MTG might be one of them there cognitive infiltrators. Far be it from me to endorse this view since Niederwacky fits the profile equally well, but I wonder how many folks know the sad tale of Paul Bennewitz? He observed strange lights and whatnot over the Defense Department's Sandia Labs as well as Kirtland Air Force Base and began aggressively monitoring radio communications. He ACTUALLY WAS the target of a disinformation campaign by the Air Force Office of Special Investigations and the intelligence community. Did that disinformation campaign try to convince him it was nothing out of the ordinary (i.e., "the LN narrative" in JFKA terms)? Hell, no! They fed him so much wild "alien" crap ("body alteration stuff" in JFKA terms) that he went off the deep end and was finally committed for psychiatric treatment. Really! If there are such things as cognitive infiltrators in the JFKA, they probably aren't the LN zealots you suspect. I'm just sayin' ...
Title: Re: Passing of Former HSCA Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey
Post by: Michael T. Griffith on June 23, 2026, 01:07:14 PM
Not true. I would refer you to Dr. Donald Thomas's extensive research on this issue. The photographic evidence is not a complete, second-by-second record of the events in Dealey Plaza, but Dr. Thomas makes a strong case that McClain was in the right position to have been in position to record the sounds on the dictabelt.

The Dealey Plaza site test done by the BBN scientists proved that the dictabelt was recorded during the assassination. Even the NRC/NAS panel concluded there was a 93% chance that the timing-movement correlations identified by the BBN scientists between the dictabelt impulses and the test-firing impulses occurred because the dictabelt was recorded during the assassination.

Have you read the HSCA materials on the acoustical evidence? How about Dr. Josiah Thompson's extensive discussion on the new developments from new research into the acoustical evidence done at BBN in 2019-2020 in his 2021 book Last Second in Dallas? His two chapters and appendices on the acoustical evidence total 114 pages. Dr. Thompson also spends considerable time on the issue of which patrol bike's mic recorded the impulse patterns on the dictabelt--he, too, makes a strong case that McClain's mic recorded those sounds.

This is an overstatement and an oversimplification. There was disagreement among the HSCA experts about matching the gunshot impulses with events in the Zapruder film. Furthermore, as I have explained in other threads, the dictabelt did not necessarily record all of the shots fired in Dealey Plaza for two possible reasons: shots could have been fired several feet away from a window and/or a silencer could have been used. The acoustical scientists noted that if a gunman fired 6-8 feet back from a window, the dictabelt probably would not have recorded the sound.

Also, we need to keep in mind that because of restrictions imposed by the committee, the BBN test firing in Dealey Plaza was limited to the sixth-floor window and the grassy knoll. If shots had been fired from one or two of the lower floors of the Dal-Tex Building or the County Records Building, more dictabelt impulse patterns may have been matched with test-firing impulse patterns.

If anyone is interested in an extensive introduction to the acoustical evidence, here's the link to my article "The HSCA's Acoustical Evidence: Proof of a Second Gunman":

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KvdvH8gTqFgMn-2vTI5ppg_egWxRKg9U/view.

Furthermore, regarding the matching of the dictabelt's gunshot impulses with the Zapruder film, not only did the HSCA's experts disagree about this, but the matching that was published in the final report (1) excluded the 140.3 impulse pattern, even though it passed the echo-delay matching test, and even though 8 of its 10 impulses matched the impulses of one of the Dealey Plaza test shots, and (2) excluded two shot reactions in the Zapruder film.

Most WC defenders don't know that new research done by BBN acoustical scientists in 2019-2020 produced new information that supports the HSCA's acoustical evidence. Among other things, the BBN scientists proved that Decker's  “hold everything” transmission is not time synchronous, that it was recorded at a different speed than the valid crosstalk transmissions, and that it is almost certainly an overdub that occurred in the copying process. In addition, they proved that the Fisher "I'll check" transmission is genuine crosstalk, which proves the impulse patterns were recorded in Dealey Plaza during the assassination.

These important developments are discussed at great length in Dr. Josiah Thompson's 2021 book Last Second in Dallas