[...]
How dumb would the conspirators have to be to put a shooter on the overpass. That's even dumber than putting a shooter on the grassy knoll.
You don't think all those other spectators would see a shooter on the overpass or hear his gunshot?
Do conspiracy hobbyists ever think through their theories?
(https://i.ibb.co/7x56drQ2/Screenshot-2026-04-26-at-12-15-35-PM.png)
Why does anybody engage with this guy? He and Royell Storing have single handedly made the JFK research world look dumber than any pairing since James Fetzer and Jack White !!(https://i.ibb.co/My0WzZqr/ezgif-com-resize-91.gif)
Why does anybody engage with this guy? He and Royell Storing have single handedly made the JFK research world look dumber than any pairing since James Fetzer and Jack White !!
Why does anybody engage with this guy? He and Royell Storing have single handedly made the JFK research world look dumber than any pairing since James Fetzer and Jack White !!
Jack White was the partner of Gary Mack. Why have you NOT Included the name of Gary Mack above? Gary was a good guy, but he committed more Boners than MLB's Fred Merkle. You definitely need to expand the membership of the club you started above.
(https://i.ibb.co/My0WzZqr/ezgif-com-resize-91.gif)
Exactly WHAT is this "arrow" aimed at? It looks like the path of that arrow goes Behind the Light Pole, and somewhere up on the Grassy Knoll.
It is an odd direction for sure... but the profile of someone "taking aim" is what begs for explanation...
I see this guy placing his forearms on the concrete rail in front of him. I do Not see him "taking aim" at anything.
(https://i.ibb.co/My0WzZqr/ezgif-com-resize-91.gif)
(https://i.ibb.co/xqv2Dqsq/ezgif-com-resize-90.gif)
You all just refuse to think as far out of the box as Jake obviously does. It could be that the ENTIRE group of people there on the bridge are conspirators.😵💫
Yes, I think you are correct… It takes a little bit of investigative curiosity even to look for these things…
Why do Jake's Guy and the guy next to him look like they are both wearing hoodies? I don't recall anyone wearing hoodies in 1963. Are they time travelers, in which case they perhaps would have been invisible to the others on the bridge (but not to the camera, which is not fooled even by time travelers)? I congratulate Jake for finding an image where, yes, I can actually see a guy, and yes, he actually does seem to be holding something. It looks like the way a press photographer would be holding a large format camera, but why would time travelers be using large format cameras - unless, perhaps, they are time travelers from the past?
Edit: As it turns out, hoodies date to WAY before 1963. So much for the time traveler theory. The two guys do look spooky and vaguely demonic, but I'll let it go. I have no idea what the device is, but isn't a scope on a rifle. It appears to be attached to the front of whatever he's holding, like a telephoto lens on a camera.
I wonder, Jake, if you fully understand the damage you do.
::) Oh, the irony. ::)
The irony of you posting this is truly Meta.
Tinfoil Nutters such as yourself are just as damaging but at least Jake isn't aware of the damage he does.
At least he doesn't mean it.
What kind of loser spends his time upholding the ridiculous lies of the Warren Commission?
What kind of loser defends the Warren Commission 63 years after the fact?
Get a life.
Those who defend the WC are defending the truth. The one and only truth. You are entitled to believe any ridiculous scenario you want but there is only one truth. If you reject that one, you aren't entitled to a different one of your liking.
The irony of you posting this is truly Meta.
Tinfoil Nutters such as yourself are just as damaging but at least Jake isn't aware of the damage he does.
At least he doesn't mean it.
What kind of loser spends his time upholding the ridiculous lies of the Warren Commission?
What kind of loser defends the Warren Commission 63 years after the fact?
Get a life.
I just LOVE IT when pompous blowhards wet their pants in public! :D :D :D
Jake, God love him, is fun. You're just tedious - except when you wet your pants in public, and then you're fun too! :D :D :D
:D :D :D
You are the biggest loser that has ever posted on this forum.
I urge everyone to look through Lance's recent posts.
What a tiny cock!
Those who defend the obvious lies of the Warren Commission Report need some kind of mental inspection.
It is very possible that you are some kind of extreme lunatic with whom any kind of rational debate is impossible.
Has that ever occurred to you?
Remember - you are like a little child who has had their opinions provided for them. You haven't thought for yourself. You've just swallowed down what you've been told to swallow down.
I've worked for my knowledge and insights.
It's possible that you are just a gigantic loser.
The final shot likely came from the bridge...
Cancellare caught this fellow sitting on the other side of the bridge...
Either a police officer... or dressed up to look like one...
I believe Unger colorized the second pic...
The last pic is a rendition to help viewer orientation...
By "bridge" you mean the triple underpass. I don't think the spot you've identified on the triple underpass is a plausible shooting location.
However, I will point out that the first thing that DPD Chief Jesse Curry and Sheriff Bill Decker did after the shots rang out was to order their men to go to the area of the triple underpass and the railroad yard behind the grassy knoll to see what had happened, clearly indicating they believed shots had come from somewhere in that area.
And of course we know from the photographic evidence that large numbers of people in the plaza, including some police officers, rushed toward the grassy knoll after the shots were fired. We also know that J. C. Price saw a man running away from the grassy knoll fence and into the railroad yard right after the shooting. A number of witnesses said they smelled the pungent odor of gun powder on or near the knoll right after the shooting. And, the Wiegman film shows a small cloud of smoke hanging in front of the trees on the knoll, which confirms the eyewitness accounts of seeing gun smoke emitted from a point just behind the fence on the knoll during the shooting.
You guys scoff at the SBT as requiring a magic bullet, then try and tell us there was a magic shooter who disappeared into thin air after firing the kill shot from behind the wooden fence.
No one ran to the underpass until DPD police officer Clyde Haygood ran there, following a radio transmission from Chief Curry to "Get men on top of that over-underpass, see what happened up there! Go up to that overpass!" Haygood can be seen parking his motorcycle at the north west curb in the Robert Hughes film. The knoll is completely void of spectators, except for he and he alone running there, and climbing up onto the concrete abutment of the underpass where he began scanning the area.
Furthermore, a photograph taken by Wilma Bond reveals Haygood as he reaches the underpass. It wasn't until after he reached the underpass that people saw him running to that location and began to follow him up the knoll. Haygood led the chase up the knoll following Chief Curry's transmission to go there.
As if any place other than the sixth floor sniper's nest is viable, given the forensic evidence available.
Which indicates they had no special powers of audio perception and could be fooled as to where the gunshots originated from.
All those people rushed to the GK and not one of them saw a gunman.
Nor did Lee Bowers who was watching from an elevated position from behind the GK.
As for the smell of gunpowder, the people who reported that were on Elm St. when they smelled it. Unless you want to argue the shooter fired from Elm St., that indicates the smell originated from a location some distance from Elm St. You would have us believe the gunpowder residue they smelled could travel to Elm St. from behind the wooden fence but not from the sniper's nest. A really illogical take on those reports.
You know this claim is erroneous, but you just keep repeating it anyway.
I've refuted this claim in several replies to you,
and each time you've either summarily dismissed or offered lame explanations for the mountain of forensic evidence that points away from Oswald
(the fact that the ammo that hit JFK's head behaved nothing like the kind of ammo that Oswald supposedly used, the fact that the head damage indicates the bullet was traveling at a high velocity [as even the Clark Panel noted, whereas the alleged murder weapon was a low-velocity rifle], the angles of the rear head shot and of the back-wound shot, the front-to-back fragmentation pattern seen on the skull x-rays, the small back-of-head fragments that could only be ricochet fragments, the evidence of a frontal entry wound on the skull x-rays, the fact that the back wound had no exit point, the evidence that the throat wound was an entry wound, etc.).
Oh, of course. But, let me guess: The people who thought shots came from the TSBD, well, they had "special powers of audio perception," while the dozens of people who heard shots from the knoll were all "mistaken," right?
And, as you know (because I've pointed it out to you),
a number of witnesses saw gun smoke coming from a spot behind the fence on the knoll during the shooting, and a small cloud of smoke can be seen hanging over a spot near the fence on the knoll in the Wiegman film.
Wrong. Why do you keep repeating claims that you know are false?
And what about J.C. Price, who watched the motorcade from the Terminal Annex Building in Dealey Plaza and who saw a man running from the fence into the railroad yard right after the shooting?
Because, as Bowers explained, his attention was diverted to the bank of the knoll when a patrolman left the motorcade and roared up the knoll.
Speaking of Bowers, before the shooting, he observed two unfamiliar men standing on top of the knoll at the edge of the parking lot, within 10 or 15 feet of each other: "one man, middle-aged or slightly older, fairly heavy-set, in a white shirt, fairly dark trousers. Another younger man, about mid-twenties, in either a plaid shirt or a plaid coat or jacket." Impressively, the HSCA's acoustical scientists determined from the police dictabelt that a shot was fired from a location just a few feet from the area that Bowers described.
Bowers also observed three cars conduct what clearly appeared to be a recon of the area behind the knoll, one at a time, in the 35 minutes leading up to the assassination. One of the drivers appeared to be talking into a microphone. No federal or local police drove in the parking lot before the shooting.
During the shooting, Bowers said something unusual occurred where the two men were located: "there was some unusual occurrence -- a flash of light or smoke or something which caused me to feel like something out of the ordinary had occurred there."
I've answered this nonsense several times now, as have others,
but you just keep repeating it.
The only "really illogical take" is yours. It is vacuous to argue that the scent of gunpowder "originated some distance from Elm St."
That's not how it works. The exact opposite is true: the pungent odor of gunpowder must have originated on the knoll in order to be detected by witnesses who were on or near the knoll during or right after the shooting, especially given the fact that several witnesses saw apparent gun smoke on the knoll and that a small cloud of smoke is visible above the fence on the Wiegman film.
Do you just not care that some people are bound to notice that you constantly repeat arguments that have been answered several times in previous replies? You seem to be hoping that readers won't read any of those previous replies and thus won't realize that you've been corrected on those arguments and are repeating them anyway.
I would be interested in knowing what Chief Curry observed to suggest that something "happened up there!"
Perhaps the images below tell much of the story...
(https://i.ibb.co/kVT9cgPt/cancellareunger-small.jpg)
(https://i.ibb.co/dJQ32wfM/cancellarecrop-small.jpg)
(https://i.ibb.co/zWpFmbcf/Screenshot-2026-04-25-at-4-42-17-PM.png)
I’d say the only way a shooter here would not be detected is if he used a short barrel suppressed rifle firing subsonic hollowpoint bullet and it was just one shot, the Z313 shot. The hollow point round caused the reverse explosion forwards and initial sight downward tilt of JFKs head at Z212 . The hollow point left a trail of smaller particles on the skull. Not for certain if that trail of smaller particles particles seem in the skull X ray line up with this bridge location.
Perhaps someone with access to more resources can determine if a trail of particles lines up...
If a sniper had a choice, however, this is likely the preferred location...
The bridge over the underpass was probably the dumbest place to shoot JFK from. Even dumber than the GK. Not only would he have been out in the open among numerous bystanders, he would have had to shoot through the windshield and had two intervening bodies between him and his target. When people dream this kind of nonsense up, do they ever give any serious thought to their theories? This question almost answers itself.
No... you are wrong here.
This is the perfect place for a sniper dressed in a police uniform and part of a larger conspiracy...
There is a straight line from this position to the president... no interference from the windshield...